植物生长调节剂对大豆根系建成的调控效应
|
摘要
试验于2008年在黑龙江省大庆市八一农垦大学试验基地进行,以K4(垦农4号大豆)和H25(合丰25号大豆)为实验材料,幼苗采用矿栽砂培方式培养,通过植物生长调节剂DTA-6和S3307在不同浓度条件下对两品种大豆的种子进行浸种处理,研究根系建成期大豆根系形态结构变化,探讨植物生长调节剂对根系生理生化的调控机制及解剖、超微结构的影响,筛选最佳浓度。主要研究结果如下:
1适宜浓度(25mg/L-50mg/L)条件下的DTA-6和S3307(0.1mg/L-0.4mg/L)对根建成期的大豆根系形态均不同程度的起到了正向调控作用。其中,D50(50mg/L的DTA-6)和S0.4(0.4mg/L的S3307)的处理效果最佳。D50处理对K4和H25品种的主根发育起到了正向调控作用。明显促进了K4的侧根长度,增加了侧根数,根体积和根干重。S0.4处理对K4的侧根长度,根体积,根干重的调节效果较好,对H25的根干重的调节效果达最佳。而DTA-6在100mg/L(D100)浓度条件下抑制了主根和侧根的生长发育。
2两品种经适宜浓度的DTA-6和S3307浸种后,显著的提高了根系活力,增加了根系中的可溶性蛋白,硝态氮和可溶性糖的含量。其中,D50和S0.4处理效果较好,均明显提高了K4根系和H25大豆根系可溶性蛋白含量,硝态氮含量和可溶性糖含量,且D50处理对K4根系活力的提高起正向调控作用。D100处理减少了大豆根系的可溶性蛋白,硝态氮和可溶性糖含量。
3 D25和S0.4处理更有利于根系酶活性的提高和MDA含量的降低,且效果达最佳。其中,D25处理显著的提高了K4根系INV活性、POD活性、SOD活性,降低了MDA的含量,对H25根系POD活性的提高,MDA含量的降低均起到了正向调控作用。而S0.4处理则提高了K4根系INV活性,降低了MDA含量,对H25根系INV活性、MDA含量的降低调控效果较好。
4 D50和S0.4处理效果较好。D50明显增加了K4大豆根系直径长度,根系导管数目,明显扩大了根系输水截面积和韧皮部截面积,增加了H25的根系导管数目,根系输水截面积和根系韧皮部截面积。S0.4处理显著增加了K4根系直径长度,中柱鞘直径长度,输水截面积以及根系韧皮部截面积。对H25根系中柱鞘直径长度和韧皮部截面积的增加效果最佳。
5经D50和S0.4处理后的液泡、线粒体及淀粉质体等结构明显而且清晰,线粒体、淀粉质体、质体数量丰富(图版7-1和7-2)。且均在不同时期出现高尔基体,并有少量内质网出现。D100和S0.2对大豆根细胞发育的抑制作用较明显。
The experiments were conducted in Daqing city, Hei Long jiang Province, in 2008. Kennong 4 and Hefeng 25 was selected as the experimental material, seedling was cultured by sand, soaking se- eds with two different PGRs(DTA-6 and S3307)in different thickness of soybean. Studied the changes of morphology and structure in the period of root building in soybean, researched the effect of PGRs on the physiology and biochemistry, anatomical structure, ultrastructure, selected the best thickness. the main results were:
1 Appropriate thickness of DTA-6(25mg/L ~ 50mg/L)and S3307 regulated the morphology of Soybean root forward. The treatments of D50 and S0.4 are the best. D50 regulated the main root length of K4 and H25 forward. Promoted the length and the number of the lateral root, volume and dry weight of root previously. Effects of S0.4 on the length of the lateral root, volume and dry weight of root are better, and on dry weight of root of H25 are the best. But D100 inhibited the main root and the lateral root length.
2 After the two varieties soaking seeds with appropriate thickness of DTA-6 and S3307, increased the root activity, the content of the soluble protein, nitrate nitrogen and soluble sugar. D50 and S3307 are the best, increased the the content of the soluble protein, nitrate nitrogen and soluble sugar of K4 and H25 previously, and D50 regulated the root activity forward. D100 reduced the content of the soluble protein, nitrate nitrogen and soluble sugar.
3 D25 and S0.4 can increased the activity of enzyme and reduce the content of MDA effectively, and are the best. D25 increased the activity of INV, POD, SOD, reduced the content of MDA of K4, regulated the activity of POD and the content of MDA of K4 forward. S0.4 increased the activity of INV, reduced the content of MDA of K4, regulated the activity of INV, the content of MDA.
4 D50 increased the length of the diameter, the number of catheter in soybean root, the sectional area of root xylem and phloem of K4 previously, and increased the the number of catheter, the sectio- nal area of root xylem and phloem of H25. S0.4 increased the length of the diameter and the pericycle, the sectional area of root xylem and phloem of K4 previously, effectively increased the length of the pericycle and sectional area of phloem.
5 After treated by PGRs of D50 and S0.4,the structure of vacuole, mitochondria and starch grain, etc are distinct, the number of mitochondria, starch grain and plastid are also rich in it(chart 7-1 and 7-2). Golgi apparatus and a spot of endoplasmic reticulum appeared in different period. D100 and S0.2 inhibited the development of cell effectively.
1适宜浓度(25mg/L-50mg/L)条件下的DTA-6和S3307(0.1mg/L-0.4mg/L)对根建成期的大豆根系形态均不同程度的起到了正向调控作用。其中,D50(50mg/L的DTA-6)和S0.4(0.4mg/L的S3307)的处理效果最佳。D50处理对K4和H25品种的主根发育起到了正向调控作用。明显促进了K4的侧根长度,增加了侧根数,根体积和根干重。S0.4处理对K4的侧根长度,根体积,根干重的调节效果较好,对H25的根干重的调节效果达最佳。而DTA-6在100mg/L(D100)浓度条件下抑制了主根和侧根的生长发育。
2两品种经适宜浓度的DTA-6和S3307浸种后,显著的提高了根系活力,增加了根系中的可溶性蛋白,硝态氮和可溶性糖的含量。其中,D50和S0.4处理效果较好,均明显提高了K4根系和H25大豆根系可溶性蛋白含量,硝态氮含量和可溶性糖含量,且D50处理对K4根系活力的提高起正向调控作用。D100处理减少了大豆根系的可溶性蛋白,硝态氮和可溶性糖含量。
3 D25和S0.4处理更有利于根系酶活性的提高和MDA含量的降低,且效果达最佳。其中,D25处理显著的提高了K4根系INV活性、POD活性、SOD活性,降低了MDA的含量,对H25根系POD活性的提高,MDA含量的降低均起到了正向调控作用。而S0.4处理则提高了K4根系INV活性,降低了MDA含量,对H25根系INV活性、MDA含量的降低调控效果较好。
4 D50和S0.4处理效果较好。D50明显增加了K4大豆根系直径长度,根系导管数目,明显扩大了根系输水截面积和韧皮部截面积,增加了H25的根系导管数目,根系输水截面积和根系韧皮部截面积。S0.4处理显著增加了K4根系直径长度,中柱鞘直径长度,输水截面积以及根系韧皮部截面积。对H25根系中柱鞘直径长度和韧皮部截面积的增加效果最佳。
5经D50和S0.4处理后的液泡、线粒体及淀粉质体等结构明显而且清晰,线粒体、淀粉质体、质体数量丰富(图版7-1和7-2)。且均在不同时期出现高尔基体,并有少量内质网出现。D100和S0.2对大豆根细胞发育的抑制作用较明显。
The experiments were conducted in Daqing city, Hei Long jiang Province, in 2008. Kennong 4 and Hefeng 25 was selected as the experimental material, seedling was cultured by sand, soaking se- eds with two different PGRs(DTA-6 and S3307)in different thickness of soybean. Studied the changes of morphology and structure in the period of root building in soybean, researched the effect of PGRs on the physiology and biochemistry, anatomical structure, ultrastructure, selected the best thickness. the main results were:
1 Appropriate thickness of DTA-6(25mg/L ~ 50mg/L)and S3307 regulated the morphology of Soybean root forward. The treatments of D50 and S0.4 are the best. D50 regulated the main root length of K4 and H25 forward. Promoted the length and the number of the lateral root, volume and dry weight of root previously. Effects of S0.4 on the length of the lateral root, volume and dry weight of root are better, and on dry weight of root of H25 are the best. But D100 inhibited the main root and the lateral root length.
2 After the two varieties soaking seeds with appropriate thickness of DTA-6 and S3307, increased the root activity, the content of the soluble protein, nitrate nitrogen and soluble sugar. D50 and S3307 are the best, increased the the content of the soluble protein, nitrate nitrogen and soluble sugar of K4 and H25 previously, and D50 regulated the root activity forward. D100 reduced the content of the soluble protein, nitrate nitrogen and soluble sugar.
3 D25 and S0.4 can increased the activity of enzyme and reduce the content of MDA effectively, and are the best. D25 increased the activity of INV, POD, SOD, reduced the content of MDA of K4, regulated the activity of POD and the content of MDA of K4 forward. S0.4 increased the activity of INV, reduced the content of MDA of K4, regulated the activity of INV, the content of MDA.
4 D50 increased the length of the diameter, the number of catheter in soybean root, the sectional area of root xylem and phloem of K4 previously, and increased the the number of catheter, the sectio- nal area of root xylem and phloem of H25. S0.4 increased the length of the diameter and the pericycle, the sectional area of root xylem and phloem of K4 previously, effectively increased the length of the pericycle and sectional area of phloem.
5 After treated by PGRs of D50 and S0.4,the structure of vacuole, mitochondria and starch grain, etc are distinct, the number of mitochondria, starch grain and plastid are also rich in it(chart 7-1 and 7-2). Golgi apparatus and a spot of endoplasmic reticulum appeared in different period. D100 and S0.2 inhibited the development of cell effectively.
引文
[1] J.Griffee, 1998, Industrial crops for food security Improvement of new and traditional industrial cropsby induced mutations and related biotechnology, Report of the Second Research Co-ordination Meeting of FAO/IAEA Coodination Research Project, held in Giessen, Germany June 30-July4, 1997, R- Eproduced by the IAEA Vienna, Austria, p,1-8
[2] Phillip L.aney.The trend of world soybean production and market[C], 2002.
[3]廖利民,韩碧文,何钟佩. S3307和PP333对大麦某些生理特性的影响[J].植物生理学通讯, 1990, 26(3):28-31.
[4]汪惠芬,陈润兴.烯效唑对油菜秧苗生长和产量的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,1997, 33(5):345-346.
[5] Stephen M, Poling W J H. Chemical induction of B-carotene biosynthesis[J]. Phytochemistry, 1977, 16: 551-555.
[6] Stephen M, Poling W J H. Synthetic bioregulators of poly-sis-carotenoid biosynthesis[J]. Phycheomi-Stry, 1982, 21(3): 601-604
[7]陈敏资.二烷氨基乙醇羧酸酯对紫罗兰生理活性的影响[J].园艺学报,1995, 22(2): 201-202.
[8]吕建洲,薛秀春,张爱莲. DA-6对圆柏生长及生理活性的调控[J].植物研究, 2000, 20(1): 73-74.
[9]张子龙,梁颖. DA-6对水稻种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].西南农业大学学报, 2001, 23(3):219-221.
[10]吕建洲,张琴.二烷氨基乙醇羧酸酯对瓜菊生长及生理活性的影响[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),1999, 22(2):153-157.
[11]梁广坚,李芸瑛.DA-6和BR+GA3对菠菜生长和光合速率的影响[J].园艺学报,1988,25:356-358.
[12]张子龙,梁颖.DTA-6对水稻种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].西南农业大学学报,2001,23(3):213-219.
[13]梁颖.DA-6对水稻幼苗抗冷性的影响[J].山地农业生物学报,2003,22(2) 95-98.
[14]吕建洲,薛秀春,张爱莲.DA-6对圆柏生长及生理活性的调控[J].植物研究,2000,20(1): 75-78
[15]梁广坚,李芸瑛,邵玲. DTA-6和BR+GA3对菠菜生长和光和速率的影响[J].园艺学报,1998,25(4):359-360.
[16]文言.二烷氨基乙醇羧酸脂对玉米种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),1999,22(1):69-71.
[17]周天,胡勇军,王萍,等.新型植物生长调节剂DA-6与TKE对羊草幼苗生长的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2004, 26(3): 242-244.
[18] Stephen M, Poling Wan-Jean Hsu, etal.Synthetic bioregulators of poly– ciscrotenoid biosynthesis Phytochemistry. 1982, 21(3):601-604.
[19]林永顺,陈睦传,沈明山等. DA-6对甜菊叶片糖甘含量和组分影响研究[J].中国糖料,1998, (3): 12-15.
[20]张明才,段留生,田晓莉等.DTA-6+Mo复配剂对甜豌豆产量品质的调控[J].华北农学报,2006, 21(增刊): 192-195.
[21] Yokoyama H, Hsu WJ, Poling S.Bioregulation of Pigment Biosynthese by Onium Compounts . ACS Symp. Ser . 1982, (181): 153-173.
[22]王熹著.作物化控研究[M].中国科技出版社,2000
[23]李丕明,奚慧达,何钟佩等.农作物化控栽培工程技术的发展与中国农业现代化前景[J].北京农业大学学报,1991, 17(增刊):1-5
[24]唐启源,周上游,邹应斌.作物栽培科学的新发展[J].中国农业科技导报,2002, 4(4):27-32
[25]韩萍,赵化春.作物化控栽培工程研究与应用概况[J].玉米科学,2001, 9(增刊):79-85
[26]梁长梅,姚满生,郭平毅.试论中国农作物化控技术的研究进展[J].山西农业科学,2002, 30( l ):84-88
[27]张石城,刘祖祺编著.植物化学调控原理与技术[M].北京,中国农业科技出版社,1999
[28]潘瑞炽,李玲.植物生长发育的化学控制(第二版)[M].广东高等教育出版社,1999
[29]李曙轩.植物生长调节剂与农业生产[M].科学出版社,1989
[30]胡贤良,李卫东.植物激素在农业中的应用技术[M].地震出版社,1994
[31]何钟佩主编.作物激素生理及化学控制[M].北京农业大学出版社,1997
[32]韩德元.植物生长调节剂—原理与应用.北京科学技术出版社.1997
[33]李曙轩.植物生长调节剂与蔬菜生产[M].上海科技出版社,1992, 8-11
[34]韩碧文,李丕明.植物生长调节剂在大田作物上的应用[J].北京农业大学学报, 1983, 9(1): 91-96
[35]周守祥.植物生长调节剂实用技术[M].中国文史出版社,1990, 7-13
[36]张丕方,赵庆华,李长荣.植物生长调节剂在农业上的应用[M].江西科技出版社, 1991, 18-21
[37]王兴才,赵宝璋,吴丁,等编著.农业化控应用技术[M].中原农民出版社,1988, 27-29
[38]李丕明,奚惠达,何钟佩,等.农作物化控栽培工程技术的发展与中国农业现代化的前景[J].北京农业大学学报,1991, 17(增): 1-5
[39]杨青华,等主编.作物化学调控原理与技术[M].中国农业科技出版社,2000,21-25
[40] Louis G. Nickell. Plant growth regulators (agricultural uses) [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1982
[41]邵莉楣,孟小雄编著.植物生长调节剂应用手册[M].北京,金盾出版社,2000
[42]王熹,俞美玉,陶龙兴等.作物化控原理[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1997
[43]李宗霆,周燮著.植物激素及其免疫检测技术[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1996
[44] Serek M, Sisler EC. Reid MS. Novel gaseous ethylene binding Inhibitor prevents ethylene effects in potted plants[J]. Journa of American Society for Horticultural Science, 1994 ,(119):1230-1233
[45] Suttle J C. Involvement of ethylene in the action of the cotton defoliant thidiazuron[J], PlantPhy-Siol, 1985(78): 272-276.
[46] Chae HS, Faure F, Kieber JJ. The eto1, eto2, and eto3 mutations and cytokine in treatment increase ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by increasing the stability of ACS protein [J]. Plant Cell, 2003, (15): 545-559
[47]徐绍颖编著.植物生长调节剂与果树生产[M].上海:上海科技出版社, 1987
[48]李明亮,韩一凡,李玲,等. ACC氧化酶cDNA克隆及其对杨树体内乙烯产生的反义抑制[J].林业科学研究,1999, 12(3): 223-229
[49] Oeller P W, Li M W, Taylor L P. Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense R NA[J]. Science , 1991, (254): 437-439
[50]王金祥,李玲,潘瑞炽.高等植物中赤霉素的生物合成及其调控[J].植物生理学通讯, 2002, 38(1): 1-8
[51]王伟,朱平,程克棣.植物赤霉素生物合成和信号传导的分子生物学[J].植物学通报,2002, 19(2): 137-149
[52] Thotas S G, Phillips A L, HeddenP. Molecular cloning and functional expression of gibberellin 2-oxidase, multifunctional enzymes involved in gibberellin deactivation [J]. Proc Natl A cad SciUSA, 1999, (96):4698-4703
[53] Coles J P,Phillips A L, Crocker S J, etal Modification of Gibberellin production and plant development in Arabidopsis by sense and antisense expression of gibberellin 20-oxidas egenes [J]. The Plant Journal, 1999, (17): 547-556
[54]倪为民,陈晓亚,许智宏.生长素极性运输研究进展[J].植物学报,2000, 42(3): 221-228
[55]倪迪安,许智宏.生长素的生物合成、代谢、受体和极性运输[J].植物生理学通讯,2001, 37(4): 346-352
[56] Hardy RWF.Plant regulation and word agriculture, New York:Scott TK(ed)[M] Plenum Press, 1979
[57]刘桃菊,戚昌瀚,唐建军.水稻根系建成与产量及其构成关系的研究[J].中国农业学,2002, 35(11): 1416-1419.
[58]尹田夫.大豆模拟株型的研究[J].作物学报,1983, (3): 205-209.
[59]苗果园,张云亭,尹钧,等.黄土高原旱地冬小麦根系生长规律的研究[J].作物学报,1989, 15(2) :104-115.
[60]杨秀红,张国栋.大豆根系的研究[J].东北农业大学学报, 2002, 33(2) :203 - 208.
[61]董钻.大豆产量生理[M] .北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
[62]王志芬,陈学留,余美炎,等.冬小麦根系32 P吸收活力的变化及其与器官建成关系的研究[J].作物学报,1995, 21(4): 458 - 462.
[63]李永山,冯利平,郭美丽,等.棉花根系的生长特性其与栽培措施和产量关系的研究I棉花根系的生长和生理活性与地上部分的关系[J].棉花学报,1992, 4(1) B 49-56.
[64]张立桢,李亚兵,王桂平,等.留营养枝棉花根系发生发育与分布规律的研究[J].棉花学报,1998, 10(6): 322-328.
[65] Gregoly L, Mullins D W, Charles H, et al.InRow subsoiling and potassium placement effects on Root growth and potassium content of cotton[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1994, 86(1): 136-139.
[66] Bolger T P, Upchurch D R, Mcmichael B L.Temperature effects on cotton root hydraulic conductance[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany, 1992, 32(1): 49-54.
[67] Smith C W, Vairil J J. Double cropping cotton and wheat[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1982, 74 (5): 862-865.
[68]章迪.卅烷醇在大豆上的应用[J].大豆科学, 1985, 4(1): 75-81
[69]刘桂菊,江延朝,齐丽.大豆应用ABT新型植物生长调节剂效果分析[J].大豆通报, 1999, (6): 12
[70]张红辉,石伟勇,马国瑞.壳聚糖对种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].东海海洋,2001, 19(2):54-59
[71]谭迎华,岳桂华.钼磷酸钾处理大豆种子的生物学效应[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 23, (2): 194-196
[72]肖昌珍,吴明才,陈吾新.多效唑对大豆的生理效应[J].中国油料, 1990(4): 51-54
[73]王敏,姚维传,张从宇.植物生长调节剂对干旱胁迫下大豆幼苗生长的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005, 19(4): 190-193
[74] Zhang, Liusheng Duan, Zhixi Zhai ct al Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Water Deficit-InducedYield Loss in soybean Proceedings of the 4th Intemational Crop Science Congress Australia[J], 2004, 135.
[75]段素梅,黄义德,杨安中.钼酸铵拌种对大豆苗期生长及硝酸还原酶活性的影响[J].安徽农学通报,2005, 11(5): 22-23
[76]张明才,何钟佩,段留生等.北农化控6号对大豆根瘤和叶片蛋白质含量的影响[J].西北植物学报,1999, 20(6): 1225-1228
[77] Waisel Y, et al. Plant Root [M]. marcel Dekker, In, 1991, 265-258
[78] Sasse J M. Recent progress in brass inoster oids research[J]. Physiol Plant, 1997, 100:696-701.
[79] Fujioka S, Sakurai A. Biosynthesis and metabolism of brassinosteroids [J]. Physiol Plant, 1997, 100:710-715
[80] Braun P, Wild A. The influence of brassinosteroids on growth and Parameters of photosynthesis of wheat and must ard plants [J]. Plant Physiol, 1984, 116: 189-196
[81] Kalinch F N, Manadava N B, Todhunter J A. Relationship of nucleic Acid metabolism tobrassinolide induced responses in bean [J]. Plant Physio, 1985, 120: 207-214
[82] Sairam P K. Effect of homobrassinolide application on plant Metabolism and grain yield underirrigated and moisture stress conditions of two wheat varieties [J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 1994, 14: 173-181
[83] Vardhini V B, Rao SSR. Effect of brassinosteroids on growth, Metabolite content and yield of Arachis hypogaea [J]. Phytochemisty, 1998, 48: 927-930
[84] Vardhini V B, RaoSSR. Effect of brassinosteroids on nodulation and nitrogenase activity in Groundnut(Arachis hypogaea L.) [J].Plant Growth Regulation, 1999, 28: 165-167
[85] Darusslam M, Michael A C, John W P. Auxin control of photo2assimilate transport to and with in developing grains of wheat [J]. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1998, (25): 69-77
[86] Swain S M. Reid J B. Kamiya Y. Gibberellins are required for embryo growth and seed development in pea[J]. Plant J. 1997, (12):1329-1338.
[87]周天.复H型植物生长调节剂—绿兴对苹果叶片生长的生理效应[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1999 , (生物学专辑): 57-58
[89]谷军.水稻应用“绿兴”生长剂试验报告[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1998, (12): 177-179
[90]周天.复H型植物生长调节剂——“绿兴”促进苹果果实的生理效果[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1998, (3): 81-83
[91] Brenner ML et al. Ehhect of endogenous and exogenous plant growth substances on development and yield of soybean [M]. in Bopp ed. Plant Growth Substances, Springer-Veriag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986: 380
[92] Daie J. Carbohydrate metabolism and partitioning in crops[J]. Hort Reu, 1986, 7, 69
[93] Borkovec V, Prochazka S. Preanthesis interaction of cytokinins and ABA in the transport of 14C-sucrose to the ear of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [J]. Agr Crop Scil, 1992, 16(9):229-235
[94]周天,胡勇军等人.植物生长调节剂对大豆幼苗光合作用特性的影响[J]. 2003, 25(4):359～361
[95]周天,胡勇军等人.三十烷基磷酸酯钾对大豆的生理功能及产量的影响[J].东北师大学报自然科学版,2004.36(2): 63-68
[96]刘莹.不同年代冬小麦品种旗叶解剖结构及光H速率日变化的研究[J].华北农学报2002,17 (增刊): 66-70
[97]高强等.多效唑对榔榆盆景植物生长的调控[J].南京林业大学学报,1992,16 (2):51-56
[98]周坚,尤录祥,樊汝汶.新植物生长调节剂83008-1对马褂木叶结构的影响[J]. 1997, 21(1): 16-20
[99]杨兴洪,孙学振,陈翠容,等.生长调节剂DPC和营养物质KH2PO4协同作用对棉苗茎解剖结构的调控效应[J].西北植物学报,1997, 17(1): 56-60
[100]杨兴洪,王玮,孙学振.生长调节剂和营养物质协同作用对棉苗下胚轴形态和解剖结构的影响[J].华北农学报,1999, 14 (2): 1-5
[101]杨兴洪,孙学振等.缩节安和KH2PO4对麦套棉叶片持水力和输导组织解剖结构的影响[J].棉花学报,1999, 11 (5): 235-240
[102]姚浩然,朱光新,李学湛等.植物生长调节剂“784-1”对大豆叶肉细胞超微结构的影响[J].中国油料, 1991, 3: 37-39
[103]金剑,刘晓冰,王光华.大豆GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL根系研究进展.大豆科学,2002, 21(3): 223-227
[104]龚振平,沈昌蒲,赵福华.大豆肥田机制的研究-Ⅱ常规技术条件下大豆根系动态.大豆科学,2000, 04: 351-355
[105]张宪政.作物生理研究法.北京:农业出版社,1992, 10
[106]何钟佩.农作物化学控制实验指导.北京:北京农业大学出版社, 1993
[107]王灶安.植物显微技术.北京:农业出版社, 1992
[108] Whatley J.M. A suggested cycle of plastid developmental interrelationships[J]. NewPhytol, 1978, 80: 489-502.
[109] Thomson W W. Development of nongreen plastids[J]. Plant Physiol, 1980, 31: 375-394.
[110]罗玉英.玉竹花粉中造粉质体形成及增殖的超微结构研究[J].电子显微学报,1995, 14(3): 166-169.
[111] Deborah A.TesfayeM.Plant improvement for tolerance to aluminum in acid soils-a review[J]. plant cell, Tissue and organ Culture, 2003, 75: 189-207.
[112]年海,黄鹤,严小龙,等.大豆对酸铝土壤的适应. I大豆耐酸铝毒材料的鉴定研究[J].大豆科学, 1999, 16(3): 191-197.
[113]沈金雄,徐巧珍.大豆耐铝酸毒害研究概况[J].中国油料作物学报,1998, 20(2): 91-96.
[114] Startaion J B, Kamprath E J, Aluminum tolerance of soybean cultivars based on root elongation In solution culture compared with growth in acid soil[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1978, 70(1):17-20
[115] Delhaize E, peter R R. Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants [J]. Plant Physiology, 1995, 107: 315-312
[116] GarvinDF, CarverBF.Role of the genotype in tolerance to acidity and aluminum toxicity. In: Rengel Z.Handbook of soil Acidity[M]. New York:Marcel Dekker Inc. 2003, 387-407.
[117]周蓉,廖伯寿,陈小媚,等.铝胁迫对花生根系的影响[J].花生科技, 1998, (4):1-4.
[118]林咸永,章永松,罗安程.不同小麦基因型耐铝性的差异及筛选方法的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2001, 7(1): 64-70.
[119]彭嘉佳,陈成榕,卢和顶.铝胁迫对大豆遗传基因型形态和生理特性的影响[J].福建省农科院学报,1994, 9(2): 34-39.
[120]王月福,于振文,李尚霞.氮素营养水平对小麦旗叶衰老过程中蛋白质和核酸代谢的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003, 9 (2): 178-183
[121] Hisao T C. Physiologicai effects of plant in response to water stress [J]. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 1973, 24: 519-570
[122]王彦荣,华泽田,陈温福,等.粳稻根系与叶片早衰的关系及其对籽粒灌浆的影响[J].作物学报,2003, 29 (6): 892-898
[123]张福群,谢金水,李祖章,等.抗早衰剂不同浓度对杂交晚稻后期叶片和根系衰老的影响[J].江西农学报,2007, 19(9): 14-18
[124]华泽田,陈温福,王彦荣,等.萘乙酸和烯效唑对超级杂交粳稻辽优3225根系生理活性的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2004, 18(3): 229-233
[125]赵秀芬,房增国,高祖明.多效唑对稻麦苗期根系活力和叶片IAA氧化酶、过氧化物酶活性的影响[J].广西农业科学,2006, 37(4): 379-381
[126] Riesa S K, Giannopelitis C N. Superoxide dismutase occurreneein higher plants. Plant Physiol, 1997, 59: 309?314
[127] Estruch J J, Beltran J P, 1991. Changes in invertase activities precede ovary growth induced by gibberellic acid in pisum sativum. Physiol Plant, 81: 319-326
[128] Ricardo C P P, Aprees T, 1970. Invertase activity during the development of carrot roots. Phytochemistry, 9: 239-247
[129] Schaffer A A, 1986. Invertase in young and mature leaves of citrus sinensis. Phytochemistry, 25: 2275-2277
[130] Xu D P, Sung S J S, Black C C, 1989. Sucrose metabolism in lima bean seeds. Plant physiol, 89: 1106～1116
[131]尹田夫等.不同抗旱性大豆绒毛适旱变态与茎形态解剖的比较研究,《大豆科学》5(3)1936, 223-225
[132] Bosabalidis A, Tsekos I. Ultrastructural studies on the secretory cavities of Citrus deliciosa Ten. I. Early stages of the gland cells differentiation. Protoplusnca, 1982, 112: 55-62
[133]韩善华,聂秀苑油菜叶片及其脱分化和再分化中质体的电镜观察实验生物学报,1986, 19(4): 287-293
[2] Phillip L.aney.The trend of world soybean production and market[C], 2002.
[3]廖利民,韩碧文,何钟佩. S3307和PP333对大麦某些生理特性的影响[J].植物生理学通讯, 1990, 26(3):28-31.
[4]汪惠芬,陈润兴.烯效唑对油菜秧苗生长和产量的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,1997, 33(5):345-346.
[5] Stephen M, Poling W J H. Chemical induction of B-carotene biosynthesis[J]. Phytochemistry, 1977, 16: 551-555.
[6] Stephen M, Poling W J H. Synthetic bioregulators of poly-sis-carotenoid biosynthesis[J]. Phycheomi-Stry, 1982, 21(3): 601-604
[7]陈敏资.二烷氨基乙醇羧酸酯对紫罗兰生理活性的影响[J].园艺学报,1995, 22(2): 201-202.
[8]吕建洲,薛秀春,张爱莲. DA-6对圆柏生长及生理活性的调控[J].植物研究, 2000, 20(1): 73-74.
[9]张子龙,梁颖. DA-6对水稻种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].西南农业大学学报, 2001, 23(3):219-221.
[10]吕建洲,张琴.二烷氨基乙醇羧酸酯对瓜菊生长及生理活性的影响[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),1999, 22(2):153-157.
[11]梁广坚,李芸瑛.DA-6和BR+GA3对菠菜生长和光合速率的影响[J].园艺学报,1988,25:356-358.
[12]张子龙,梁颖.DTA-6对水稻种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].西南农业大学学报,2001,23(3):213-219.
[13]梁颖.DA-6对水稻幼苗抗冷性的影响[J].山地农业生物学报,2003,22(2) 95-98.
[14]吕建洲,薛秀春,张爱莲.DA-6对圆柏生长及生理活性的调控[J].植物研究,2000,20(1): 75-78
[15]梁广坚,李芸瑛,邵玲. DTA-6和BR+GA3对菠菜生长和光和速率的影响[J].园艺学报,1998,25(4):359-360.
[16]文言.二烷氨基乙醇羧酸脂对玉米种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),1999,22(1):69-71.
[17]周天,胡勇军,王萍,等.新型植物生长调节剂DA-6与TKE对羊草幼苗生长的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2004, 26(3): 242-244.
[18] Stephen M, Poling Wan-Jean Hsu, etal.Synthetic bioregulators of poly– ciscrotenoid biosynthesis Phytochemistry. 1982, 21(3):601-604.
[19]林永顺,陈睦传,沈明山等. DA-6对甜菊叶片糖甘含量和组分影响研究[J].中国糖料,1998, (3): 12-15.
[20]张明才,段留生,田晓莉等.DTA-6+Mo复配剂对甜豌豆产量品质的调控[J].华北农学报,2006, 21(增刊): 192-195.
[21] Yokoyama H, Hsu WJ, Poling S.Bioregulation of Pigment Biosynthese by Onium Compounts . ACS Symp. Ser . 1982, (181): 153-173.
[22]王熹著.作物化控研究[M].中国科技出版社,2000
[23]李丕明,奚慧达,何钟佩等.农作物化控栽培工程技术的发展与中国农业现代化前景[J].北京农业大学学报,1991, 17(增刊):1-5
[24]唐启源,周上游,邹应斌.作物栽培科学的新发展[J].中国农业科技导报,2002, 4(4):27-32
[25]韩萍,赵化春.作物化控栽培工程研究与应用概况[J].玉米科学,2001, 9(增刊):79-85
[26]梁长梅,姚满生,郭平毅.试论中国农作物化控技术的研究进展[J].山西农业科学,2002, 30( l ):84-88
[27]张石城,刘祖祺编著.植物化学调控原理与技术[M].北京,中国农业科技出版社,1999
[28]潘瑞炽,李玲.植物生长发育的化学控制(第二版)[M].广东高等教育出版社,1999
[29]李曙轩.植物生长调节剂与农业生产[M].科学出版社,1989
[30]胡贤良,李卫东.植物激素在农业中的应用技术[M].地震出版社,1994
[31]何钟佩主编.作物激素生理及化学控制[M].北京农业大学出版社,1997
[32]韩德元.植物生长调节剂—原理与应用.北京科学技术出版社.1997
[33]李曙轩.植物生长调节剂与蔬菜生产[M].上海科技出版社,1992, 8-11
[34]韩碧文,李丕明.植物生长调节剂在大田作物上的应用[J].北京农业大学学报, 1983, 9(1): 91-96
[35]周守祥.植物生长调节剂实用技术[M].中国文史出版社,1990, 7-13
[36]张丕方,赵庆华,李长荣.植物生长调节剂在农业上的应用[M].江西科技出版社, 1991, 18-21
[37]王兴才,赵宝璋,吴丁,等编著.农业化控应用技术[M].中原农民出版社,1988, 27-29
[38]李丕明,奚惠达,何钟佩,等.农作物化控栽培工程技术的发展与中国农业现代化的前景[J].北京农业大学学报,1991, 17(增): 1-5
[39]杨青华,等主编.作物化学调控原理与技术[M].中国农业科技出版社,2000,21-25
[40] Louis G. Nickell. Plant growth regulators (agricultural uses) [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1982
[41]邵莉楣,孟小雄编著.植物生长调节剂应用手册[M].北京,金盾出版社,2000
[42]王熹,俞美玉,陶龙兴等.作物化控原理[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1997
[43]李宗霆,周燮著.植物激素及其免疫检测技术[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1996
[44] Serek M, Sisler EC. Reid MS. Novel gaseous ethylene binding Inhibitor prevents ethylene effects in potted plants[J]. Journa of American Society for Horticultural Science, 1994 ,(119):1230-1233
[45] Suttle J C. Involvement of ethylene in the action of the cotton defoliant thidiazuron[J], PlantPhy-Siol, 1985(78): 272-276.
[46] Chae HS, Faure F, Kieber JJ. The eto1, eto2, and eto3 mutations and cytokine in treatment increase ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by increasing the stability of ACS protein [J]. Plant Cell, 2003, (15): 545-559
[47]徐绍颖编著.植物生长调节剂与果树生产[M].上海:上海科技出版社, 1987
[48]李明亮,韩一凡,李玲,等. ACC氧化酶cDNA克隆及其对杨树体内乙烯产生的反义抑制[J].林业科学研究,1999, 12(3): 223-229
[49] Oeller P W, Li M W, Taylor L P. Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense R NA[J]. Science , 1991, (254): 437-439
[50]王金祥,李玲,潘瑞炽.高等植物中赤霉素的生物合成及其调控[J].植物生理学通讯, 2002, 38(1): 1-8
[51]王伟,朱平,程克棣.植物赤霉素生物合成和信号传导的分子生物学[J].植物学通报,2002, 19(2): 137-149
[52] Thotas S G, Phillips A L, HeddenP. Molecular cloning and functional expression of gibberellin 2-oxidase, multifunctional enzymes involved in gibberellin deactivation [J]. Proc Natl A cad SciUSA, 1999, (96):4698-4703
[53] Coles J P,Phillips A L, Crocker S J, etal Modification of Gibberellin production and plant development in Arabidopsis by sense and antisense expression of gibberellin 20-oxidas egenes [J]. The Plant Journal, 1999, (17): 547-556
[54]倪为民,陈晓亚,许智宏.生长素极性运输研究进展[J].植物学报,2000, 42(3): 221-228
[55]倪迪安,许智宏.生长素的生物合成、代谢、受体和极性运输[J].植物生理学通讯,2001, 37(4): 346-352
[56] Hardy RWF.Plant regulation and word agriculture, New York:Scott TK(ed)[M] Plenum Press, 1979
[57]刘桃菊,戚昌瀚,唐建军.水稻根系建成与产量及其构成关系的研究[J].中国农业学,2002, 35(11): 1416-1419.
[58]尹田夫.大豆模拟株型的研究[J].作物学报,1983, (3): 205-209.
[59]苗果园,张云亭,尹钧,等.黄土高原旱地冬小麦根系生长规律的研究[J].作物学报,1989, 15(2) :104-115.
[60]杨秀红,张国栋.大豆根系的研究[J].东北农业大学学报, 2002, 33(2) :203 - 208.
[61]董钻.大豆产量生理[M] .北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
[62]王志芬,陈学留,余美炎,等.冬小麦根系32 P吸收活力的变化及其与器官建成关系的研究[J].作物学报,1995, 21(4): 458 - 462.
[63]李永山,冯利平,郭美丽,等.棉花根系的生长特性其与栽培措施和产量关系的研究I棉花根系的生长和生理活性与地上部分的关系[J].棉花学报,1992, 4(1) B 49-56.
[64]张立桢,李亚兵,王桂平,等.留营养枝棉花根系发生发育与分布规律的研究[J].棉花学报,1998, 10(6): 322-328.
[65] Gregoly L, Mullins D W, Charles H, et al.InRow subsoiling and potassium placement effects on Root growth and potassium content of cotton[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1994, 86(1): 136-139.
[66] Bolger T P, Upchurch D R, Mcmichael B L.Temperature effects on cotton root hydraulic conductance[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany, 1992, 32(1): 49-54.
[67] Smith C W, Vairil J J. Double cropping cotton and wheat[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1982, 74 (5): 862-865.
[68]章迪.卅烷醇在大豆上的应用[J].大豆科学, 1985, 4(1): 75-81
[69]刘桂菊,江延朝,齐丽.大豆应用ABT新型植物生长调节剂效果分析[J].大豆通报, 1999, (6): 12
[70]张红辉,石伟勇,马国瑞.壳聚糖对种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].东海海洋,2001, 19(2):54-59
[71]谭迎华,岳桂华.钼磷酸钾处理大豆种子的生物学效应[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 23, (2): 194-196
[72]肖昌珍,吴明才,陈吾新.多效唑对大豆的生理效应[J].中国油料, 1990(4): 51-54
[73]王敏,姚维传,张从宇.植物生长调节剂对干旱胁迫下大豆幼苗生长的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005, 19(4): 190-193
[74] Zhang, Liusheng Duan, Zhixi Zhai ct al Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Water Deficit-InducedYield Loss in soybean Proceedings of the 4th Intemational Crop Science Congress Australia[J], 2004, 135.
[75]段素梅,黄义德,杨安中.钼酸铵拌种对大豆苗期生长及硝酸还原酶活性的影响[J].安徽农学通报,2005, 11(5): 22-23
[76]张明才,何钟佩,段留生等.北农化控6号对大豆根瘤和叶片蛋白质含量的影响[J].西北植物学报,1999, 20(6): 1225-1228
[77] Waisel Y, et al. Plant Root [M]. marcel Dekker, In, 1991, 265-258
[78] Sasse J M. Recent progress in brass inoster oids research[J]. Physiol Plant, 1997, 100:696-701.
[79] Fujioka S, Sakurai A. Biosynthesis and metabolism of brassinosteroids [J]. Physiol Plant, 1997, 100:710-715
[80] Braun P, Wild A. The influence of brassinosteroids on growth and Parameters of photosynthesis of wheat and must ard plants [J]. Plant Physiol, 1984, 116: 189-196
[81] Kalinch F N, Manadava N B, Todhunter J A. Relationship of nucleic Acid metabolism tobrassinolide induced responses in bean [J]. Plant Physio, 1985, 120: 207-214
[82] Sairam P K. Effect of homobrassinolide application on plant Metabolism and grain yield underirrigated and moisture stress conditions of two wheat varieties [J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 1994, 14: 173-181
[83] Vardhini V B, Rao SSR. Effect of brassinosteroids on growth, Metabolite content and yield of Arachis hypogaea [J]. Phytochemisty, 1998, 48: 927-930
[84] Vardhini V B, RaoSSR. Effect of brassinosteroids on nodulation and nitrogenase activity in Groundnut(Arachis hypogaea L.) [J].Plant Growth Regulation, 1999, 28: 165-167
[85] Darusslam M, Michael A C, John W P. Auxin control of photo2assimilate transport to and with in developing grains of wheat [J]. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1998, (25): 69-77
[86] Swain S M. Reid J B. Kamiya Y. Gibberellins are required for embryo growth and seed development in pea[J]. Plant J. 1997, (12):1329-1338.
[87]周天.复H型植物生长调节剂—绿兴对苹果叶片生长的生理效应[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1999 , (生物学专辑): 57-58
[89]谷军.水稻应用“绿兴”生长剂试验报告[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1998, (12): 177-179
[90]周天.复H型植物生长调节剂——“绿兴”促进苹果果实的生理效果[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1998, (3): 81-83
[91] Brenner ML et al. Ehhect of endogenous and exogenous plant growth substances on development and yield of soybean [M]. in Bopp ed. Plant Growth Substances, Springer-Veriag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986: 380
[92] Daie J. Carbohydrate metabolism and partitioning in crops[J]. Hort Reu, 1986, 7, 69
[93] Borkovec V, Prochazka S. Preanthesis interaction of cytokinins and ABA in the transport of 14C-sucrose to the ear of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [J]. Agr Crop Scil, 1992, 16(9):229-235
[94]周天,胡勇军等人.植物生长调节剂对大豆幼苗光合作用特性的影响[J]. 2003, 25(4):359～361
[95]周天,胡勇军等人.三十烷基磷酸酯钾对大豆的生理功能及产量的影响[J].东北师大学报自然科学版,2004.36(2): 63-68
[96]刘莹.不同年代冬小麦品种旗叶解剖结构及光H速率日变化的研究[J].华北农学报2002,17 (增刊): 66-70
[97]高强等.多效唑对榔榆盆景植物生长的调控[J].南京林业大学学报,1992,16 (2):51-56
[98]周坚,尤录祥,樊汝汶.新植物生长调节剂83008-1对马褂木叶结构的影响[J]. 1997, 21(1): 16-20
[99]杨兴洪,孙学振,陈翠容,等.生长调节剂DPC和营养物质KH2PO4协同作用对棉苗茎解剖结构的调控效应[J].西北植物学报,1997, 17(1): 56-60
[100]杨兴洪,王玮,孙学振.生长调节剂和营养物质协同作用对棉苗下胚轴形态和解剖结构的影响[J].华北农学报,1999, 14 (2): 1-5
[101]杨兴洪,孙学振等.缩节安和KH2PO4对麦套棉叶片持水力和输导组织解剖结构的影响[J].棉花学报,1999, 11 (5): 235-240
[102]姚浩然,朱光新,李学湛等.植物生长调节剂“784-1”对大豆叶肉细胞超微结构的影响[J].中国油料, 1991, 3: 37-39
[103]金剑,刘晓冰,王光华.大豆GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL根系研究进展.大豆科学,2002, 21(3): 223-227
[104]龚振平,沈昌蒲,赵福华.大豆肥田机制的研究-Ⅱ常规技术条件下大豆根系动态.大豆科学,2000, 04: 351-355
[105]张宪政.作物生理研究法.北京:农业出版社,1992, 10
[106]何钟佩.农作物化学控制实验指导.北京:北京农业大学出版社, 1993
[107]王灶安.植物显微技术.北京:农业出版社, 1992
[108] Whatley J.M. A suggested cycle of plastid developmental interrelationships[J]. NewPhytol, 1978, 80: 489-502.
[109] Thomson W W. Development of nongreen plastids[J]. Plant Physiol, 1980, 31: 375-394.
[110]罗玉英.玉竹花粉中造粉质体形成及增殖的超微结构研究[J].电子显微学报,1995, 14(3): 166-169.
[111] Deborah A.TesfayeM.Plant improvement for tolerance to aluminum in acid soils-a review[J]. plant cell, Tissue and organ Culture, 2003, 75: 189-207.
[112]年海,黄鹤,严小龙,等.大豆对酸铝土壤的适应. I大豆耐酸铝毒材料的鉴定研究[J].大豆科学, 1999, 16(3): 191-197.
[113]沈金雄,徐巧珍.大豆耐铝酸毒害研究概况[J].中国油料作物学报,1998, 20(2): 91-96.
[114] Startaion J B, Kamprath E J, Aluminum tolerance of soybean cultivars based on root elongation In solution culture compared with growth in acid soil[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1978, 70(1):17-20
[115] Delhaize E, peter R R. Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants [J]. Plant Physiology, 1995, 107: 315-312
[116] GarvinDF, CarverBF.Role of the genotype in tolerance to acidity and aluminum toxicity. In: Rengel Z.Handbook of soil Acidity[M]. New York:Marcel Dekker Inc. 2003, 387-407.
[117]周蓉,廖伯寿,陈小媚,等.铝胁迫对花生根系的影响[J].花生科技, 1998, (4):1-4.
[118]林咸永,章永松,罗安程.不同小麦基因型耐铝性的差异及筛选方法的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2001, 7(1): 64-70.
[119]彭嘉佳,陈成榕,卢和顶.铝胁迫对大豆遗传基因型形态和生理特性的影响[J].福建省农科院学报,1994, 9(2): 34-39.
[120]王月福,于振文,李尚霞.氮素营养水平对小麦旗叶衰老过程中蛋白质和核酸代谢的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003, 9 (2): 178-183
[121] Hisao T C. Physiologicai effects of plant in response to water stress [J]. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 1973, 24: 519-570
[122]王彦荣,华泽田,陈温福,等.粳稻根系与叶片早衰的关系及其对籽粒灌浆的影响[J].作物学报,2003, 29 (6): 892-898
[123]张福群,谢金水,李祖章,等.抗早衰剂不同浓度对杂交晚稻后期叶片和根系衰老的影响[J].江西农学报,2007, 19(9): 14-18
[124]华泽田,陈温福,王彦荣,等.萘乙酸和烯效唑对超级杂交粳稻辽优3225根系生理活性的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2004, 18(3): 229-233
[125]赵秀芬,房增国,高祖明.多效唑对稻麦苗期根系活力和叶片IAA氧化酶、过氧化物酶活性的影响[J].广西农业科学,2006, 37(4): 379-381
[126] Riesa S K, Giannopelitis C N. Superoxide dismutase occurreneein higher plants. Plant Physiol, 1997, 59: 309?314
[127] Estruch J J, Beltran J P, 1991. Changes in invertase activities precede ovary growth induced by gibberellic acid in pisum sativum. Physiol Plant, 81: 319-326
[128] Ricardo C P P, Aprees T, 1970. Invertase activity during the development of carrot roots. Phytochemistry, 9: 239-247
[129] Schaffer A A, 1986. Invertase in young and mature leaves of citrus sinensis. Phytochemistry, 25: 2275-2277
[130] Xu D P, Sung S J S, Black C C, 1989. Sucrose metabolism in lima bean seeds. Plant physiol, 89: 1106～1116
[131]尹田夫等.不同抗旱性大豆绒毛适旱变态与茎形态解剖的比较研究,《大豆科学》5(3)1936, 223-225
[132] Bosabalidis A, Tsekos I. Ultrastructural studies on the secretory cavities of Citrus deliciosa Ten. I. Early stages of the gland cells differentiation. Protoplusnca, 1982, 112: 55-62
[133]韩善华,聂秀苑油菜叶片及其脱分化和再分化中质体的电镜观察实验生物学报,1986, 19(4): 287-293