轴根型苜蓿幼龄根系构型初探及抗旱性分析
|
摘要
根系是植物与土壤相互作用的界面,其主要功能是吸收土壤中的水分和养分,而根系的构型对根系吸收水分和养分效率有重要影响。本研究针对根的多样性,初步探讨了幼龄苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)在黄土高原半干旱区根系形态特征、农艺性状、根系构型划分及命名,并利用抗旱性指标分析不同根系构型的抗旱性。结果表明:
1.品种间根系的主根长度和直径、一级侧根长度和直径、侧根数、根体积、根干重差异显著。在相同旱作条件下,苜蓿品种间侧根发生能力主要决定于品种的生物学特性,具有可遗传特性。
2.根系形态指标间相关性分析表明,根干重分别与主根直径、侧根长度、侧根直径呈极显著正相关;侧根直径与侧根长度二者也呈极显著正相关。
3.运用灰色系统关联度理论和模糊数学方法中的权重决策法对幼龄苜蓿根系形态与农艺性状指标分析。计算求得各个指标的权重系数为侧根长度>侧根数>生长高度>根夹角>主根直径>主根长度>侧根直径>根体积>生长速度>茎叶比。
4.本研究通过探讨根系构型的划分及命名,确定根径比和根夹角为划分根系构型的典型指标,将轴根型苜蓿幼龄根系分为四类,即构型Ⅰ:细径小锐角型;构型Ⅱ:细径大锐角型;构型Ⅲ:粗径小锐角型;构型Ⅳ:粗径大锐角根型。
5.通过抗旱性指标分析表明,可以将四类根系构型的抗旱性划分为强、弱两个抗旱能力类群。抗旱性强的根系构型为类型Ⅰ和类型Ⅲ,主要特点是含水量较大,膜透性较小,脯氨酸含量较大;抗旱性弱的根系构型为类型Ⅱ和类型Ⅳ,主要特点是含水量较小,膜透性较大,脯氨酸含量较小。
6.根据根系构型的抗旱性强弱,可对属于不同根系构型的苜蓿品种的抗旱性作出推测。
Root system is the medium between plant and soil,capturing water and nutrient from soil is the main function of the root,but root architectural features has important effects on the root's ability to capture water and nutrient.Based on root,the text focus young alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) on root morphology structure, agronomic traits, grouping and naming of root architectur, and using the indexes of drought resistance to analysis the capacity of drought resisitance of different root architectur in the arid and sim-arid regions of the Loess Plateau.The results show:
1. There are distinctly difference among alfalfa cultivars in length and diameter of the main root, length and diameter of the max-secondary root, the number of the Lat.root, volume of root system and dry weight of root. Under same condition of dry farming, development ability of the max-secondary root mainly depend on plant of alfalfa cultivars, bearing a trait of inheritance.
2.Based on correlation coefficient of root morphology indexes, dry weight of root is positively correlative with diameter of the main root,length and diameter of the max-secondary root, And length of the max-secondary is positively correlative with diameter of the max-secondary root.
3. The root morphology and agronomic traits were evaluated using grey relevancy and decision making method of with information of Fuzzy Mathematics. The results showed that indexes of root morphology had the highest weight than of agronomic traits.
4.Passing discussion partition and naming of root architectur, confirmation of root architectura must represent root morphplogy character and space character so that root indexes must be selected strictly. Lastly, root is confirmed as representative indexes for dividing root architectural, which will divide young Alfalfa root system to four groups,namly ArchitecturⅠ: thin diameter and small acute angle; ArchitecturⅡ: thin diameter and big acute angle; ArchitecturⅢ; thick diameter and small acute angle; ArchitecturⅣ: thick diameter and big acute angle.
5. Using drought resistant indexes to analysis shows that the drought resistant capacity of root architectur will be divided two different drought resistant groups with strongness and feebleness. ArchitecturⅠand ArchitecturⅢare belong to the strong drought resistant group with the more containing water, the smaller relative permeability of cell memberance and the more content of free praline; ArchitecturⅡand ArchitecturⅣare belong to the feeble drought resistant group with the more containing water, the bigger relative permeability of cell memberance and the littler content of free praline.
6. Based on different drought resistant capacity of root architectur, different drought resistant capacity of tested alfalfa cultivars belonged to different root Architectur will be conferred.
1.品种间根系的主根长度和直径、一级侧根长度和直径、侧根数、根体积、根干重差异显著。在相同旱作条件下,苜蓿品种间侧根发生能力主要决定于品种的生物学特性,具有可遗传特性。
2.根系形态指标间相关性分析表明,根干重分别与主根直径、侧根长度、侧根直径呈极显著正相关;侧根直径与侧根长度二者也呈极显著正相关。
3.运用灰色系统关联度理论和模糊数学方法中的权重决策法对幼龄苜蓿根系形态与农艺性状指标分析。计算求得各个指标的权重系数为侧根长度>侧根数>生长高度>根夹角>主根直径>主根长度>侧根直径>根体积>生长速度>茎叶比。
4.本研究通过探讨根系构型的划分及命名,确定根径比和根夹角为划分根系构型的典型指标,将轴根型苜蓿幼龄根系分为四类,即构型Ⅰ:细径小锐角型;构型Ⅱ:细径大锐角型;构型Ⅲ:粗径小锐角型;构型Ⅳ:粗径大锐角根型。
5.通过抗旱性指标分析表明,可以将四类根系构型的抗旱性划分为强、弱两个抗旱能力类群。抗旱性强的根系构型为类型Ⅰ和类型Ⅲ,主要特点是含水量较大,膜透性较小,脯氨酸含量较大;抗旱性弱的根系构型为类型Ⅱ和类型Ⅳ,主要特点是含水量较小,膜透性较大,脯氨酸含量较小。
6.根据根系构型的抗旱性强弱,可对属于不同根系构型的苜蓿品种的抗旱性作出推测。
Root system is the medium between plant and soil,capturing water and nutrient from soil is the main function of the root,but root architectural features has important effects on the root's ability to capture water and nutrient.Based on root,the text focus young alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) on root morphology structure, agronomic traits, grouping and naming of root architectur, and using the indexes of drought resistance to analysis the capacity of drought resisitance of different root architectur in the arid and sim-arid regions of the Loess Plateau.The results show:
1. There are distinctly difference among alfalfa cultivars in length and diameter of the main root, length and diameter of the max-secondary root, the number of the Lat.root, volume of root system and dry weight of root. Under same condition of dry farming, development ability of the max-secondary root mainly depend on plant of alfalfa cultivars, bearing a trait of inheritance.
2.Based on correlation coefficient of root morphology indexes, dry weight of root is positively correlative with diameter of the main root,length and diameter of the max-secondary root, And length of the max-secondary is positively correlative with diameter of the max-secondary root.
3. The root morphology and agronomic traits were evaluated using grey relevancy and decision making method of with information of Fuzzy Mathematics. The results showed that indexes of root morphology had the highest weight than of agronomic traits.
4.Passing discussion partition and naming of root architectur, confirmation of root architectura must represent root morphplogy character and space character so that root indexes must be selected strictly. Lastly, root is confirmed as representative indexes for dividing root architectural, which will divide young Alfalfa root system to four groups,namly ArchitecturⅠ: thin diameter and small acute angle; ArchitecturⅡ: thin diameter and big acute angle; ArchitecturⅢ; thick diameter and small acute angle; ArchitecturⅣ: thick diameter and big acute angle.
5. Using drought resistant indexes to analysis shows that the drought resistant capacity of root architectur will be divided two different drought resistant groups with strongness and feebleness. ArchitecturⅠand ArchitecturⅢare belong to the strong drought resistant group with the more containing water, the smaller relative permeability of cell memberance and the more content of free praline; ArchitecturⅡand ArchitecturⅣare belong to the feeble drought resistant group with the more containing water, the bigger relative permeability of cell memberance and the littler content of free praline.
6. Based on different drought resistant capacity of root architectur, different drought resistant capacity of tested alfalfa cultivars belonged to different root Architectur will be conferred.
引文
[1]贺金生,王政全,方精云.全球变化下的地下生态学问题与展望[J].科学通讯,2004,13(49):1226~1232.
[2]S.S.Ray.小麦根重分布模式的定量研究[J].国外农学-麦类作物,1994,(1):25~26.
[3]Schlesinger W H. Carbon sequestration in soils.Science,1999, 284: 20~95.
[4]Copley J. Ecology goes underground. Nature, 2000, 406: 452-454.
[5]Caldwell M M, Pearcy R W. Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants: Ecophysiological Processes Above and Below Ground. San Diego: Academic Press. 1994.
[6]Chapin F SⅢ, Ruess R W. The roots of the matter. Nature, 2001,4(11): 749~752.
[7]Weaver, J.E. Root development of field crops[M].McGraw-Hill,New York,1926.
[8]Schlesinger W H. Biogeochemistry: an Analysis of Global Change.San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press, 1997.
[9] Pregitzer K S, DeForest J L, Burton A J, et al. Fine root architecture of nine north American trees. Ecol Monogr, 2002, 72:293~309.
[10]Fitter AH. Characteristics and Function of root systems. In Y Waisel, A Eshel, Y Kafkafi, eds, Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. Marcel Dekker, NewYork,1995,3~25.
[11]罗远培,李韵珠等.根土系统与作物水氮资源利用效率.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1996
[12]Van Noordwij M, Vande Geijn S C. Root, shoot and parameters required for process-oriented models of crop growth limited by water or nutrients. Plant and Soil, 1996, 183:1~25
[13]Doussan C, Pages L, Vercamdre G. Modeling of the hydraulic architecture of root systems: Anintegrated approach to water absorption Model description. Annals of Botany,1998,81:213~223
[14]Lynch J.Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol, 1995,109: 7~13.
[15]Hacket C,Rose D A.Model of the extension and branching of aseminal root of ba rley,and its use in studying relations between root di mensions.I.The Model. Aust.J.BoilSci,1972,2 5:669~679.
[16]Hackket C, Bartlete B O.A study of the root system of barley.3.Branching pattenr.New Phytol, 1971, 70:409~413.
[17]Hackket C. A study of the root system of barley.Effects of nutrition on two varieties.New Phytol,1968,67: 287~-300.
[18]Fitter A H. The topology and geometry of plant root system influence of watering rate onroot systemt opology in Trifoliump ratense.Annals of Botany, 1986, 58: 91~101.
[19]苗玉新.大田作物根系研究法概述[J].黑龙江农业科学,2005 (3):50~52.
[20]管建慧,刘克礼,郭新宇.玉米根系构型的研究进展[J].玉米科学, 2006,14(6):162~166.
[21]Diggle A J.Rootmap Amodel in three-dimensional coordinates of the growth and structure of fibrous root system[J].Plant and Soil,1998,105:169~178.
[22]刘殿英,黄炳茹.土壤水分对冬小麦根系的影响[J].山东农业大学学报,1991,22(2): 103~110.
[23]郭正刚,张自和,侯扶江等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区不同紫花苜蓿品种间根系发育能力的研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8): 1007~1012.
[24]万素梅,胡守林,黄勤慧,王龙昌,赵书珍,胡建宏.不同紫花苜蓿品种根系发育能力的研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(11):2048~2052
[25]Paul W U,Thomas C K. Soil compaction and root growth[J].A Review,Agronomy Joumal,1994,86:759~766.
[26]孙启忠,韩建国,桂荣等.科尔沁沙地苜蓿根系和根颈特性[J].草地学报,2001,9(4):270~273
[27] Materechera S A. Penetration of very strong soil by seeding roots of different species[J].Plant and Soil,1991,135:31~41.
[28]Fitter A H.The characteristics and functions of root systems[A].In Plant Roots:The Hidden Half[M].Eds.Y Waisel,U Kafkafi,A Eshel.New York:Marcel Dekker Inc,1991.3~25
[29]刘凤芹,吴伟,刘秀萍等.林木根系结构动态模型压就[J].水土保持研究,2006,13:265~267
[30]Fitter A H, Stickland T R. Architectural analysis of plant root systemsⅡ. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species. New Phytol,1991,118:383~389.
[31]张富川.苜蓿对水分的需要量及原理研究[J].四川草原,1994, 2:17~21.
[32]曹仪植,宋占午.植物生理学[M]兰州大学出版社,1998.
[33]刘祖祺,张石城主编.植物抗旱生理学[M].中国农业出版社,1994.
[34]Marble V L. Fodders for the Near East: Alfalfa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,1989,47.
[35] Sinskaya E N. Flora of cultivated plants of the U.S.S.R.ⅧPerennial Legumes Plants. Part I. Medic, sweet clover, fenugreek. Translated by Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem,1950.
[36]Bolton J L, Goplenand B P, Baenziger H. Alfalfa. Sciand Technology, America SocietyAgronomy Wisconsin, 1972, 1~34.
[37]Lowe, Marble V L, Rumbaugh M D. Adapatation, varieties, and usuage.Monograph No, 15,Chapter,18. In alfalfa Science and Technology, 1972,391~413.
[38] AbdulJabbar A S, Sammis T W, Lugg D G. Effect of moisture level on the root pattern alfalfa. lirrigation Science,1982,3:197~207.
[39]. Waldron L R. North Dakota agricultural. Experiment Station Bull,1991,95: 391~424.
[40]李造哲.10种苜蓿品种幼苗抗早性研的究[J].中国草地,1991,3:1~3.
[41]程伟燕,张卫国,哈斯其木格等.紫花苜蓿的形态解剖学观察[J].内蒙古民族大学学报,2003,6:251-254.
[42]李崇巍,贾志宽,林玲等.几种苜蓿新品种抗旱性的初步研究[J].干旱地区农业研究2002,20(4): 21~25.
[43]汤章程.逆境条件下植物脯氨酸的积累及其的意义[J].植物生理学通讯,1984,(1):15~21.
[44]Neumann P M.The role of cell wall adjustment in plant resistance to water deficit.Crop Science,1995,35:(5): 1258~1266.
[45]彭立新,李德全,束怀瑞.园艺植物干旱胁迫生理及耐旱机制研究进展[J].西北植物学报,2002,22(5): 1275~1281.
[46]Papadakis A K, Roubelakis-angelakis K A. Oxidative stress could be responsible for the recalcitrance of plant protoplasts. Plant physiology and Biochemistry,2002,40(68):549~559.
[47]谭云,叶庆生,李玲.植物抗旱过程中ABA生理作用的研究进展[J].植物学通报,2001,18(2): 197~201.
[48]Kidambi S P. Matches A G, Bolger T P. Mineral concentrations in alfalfa and sainfoin as influenced by soil moisture level. Agronomy Journal, 1990, 82:229~236.
[49]Deetz D A, Jung H G, Buxton D R. Water deficit effect on cell wall composition and in vitro degradability of structural polysaccharides. Crop Science,1996,36:383~388.
[50]Duru, M, Langlet, A. Effects de la competition pour la lumiere et dudeficit eneau sur levolution du rapport feuille/tige de la luzerne. Fourrages, 1993,134:199~204.
[51]韩清芳.不同苜蓿品种抗逆性、生产性能及品质特性研究.西北农林科技大学博士论文. 2003,P45,90~100.
[52]黎裕.作物抗旱鉴定方法与指标[J].干旱地区农业研究,1993,11(1): 91~99.
[53]陶玲.1998.甘肃省紫花苜蓿地方类型抗旱性综合评判[J].草业学报,7(2): 57~61.
[54]徐云碧,朱立煌著.分子数量遗传学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994,1~9.
[55]Nobel PS. Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physioligy. Academic Press San Diego,1991.
[56]Doussan C, Pages L, Vercamdre G.Modeling of the hydraulic architecture of root systems: Anintegrated approach to water absorption -Model description.Annals of Botany,1998,81: 213~223.
[57]St. Aubin G, Canny MJ, McCully ME. Living vessel elements in the late metaxylemof sheathed maize roots. Ann Bot, 1986,58: 577~588.
[58]Wenzel C L, McCully M E, Canny M J. Development of water conducting capacity in the root systems of young plants of corn and some other C4 grasses. Plant Physiol, 1989,89: 1049~1101.
[59]McCully M E. Accumulation of high levels of potassium in the developing xylemelements in roots soybean and some other dicotyledons. Protoplasma,1994,183:116~125.
[60]Wang X L, McCully M E, Canny M J.The water status of the roots of soil-grown maize in relation to the maturity of their xylem. Plant Physiol, 1991,82:157~162.
[61]Varney G T, Canny M J. Rates of water uptake into the mature root system of maize plants. New Phytologist, 1993, 123: 775~786.
[62]Sinskaya E N. Flora of cultivated plants of the U.S.S.R.ⅧPerennial Legumes Plants. Part I. Medic, sweet clover, fenugreek.Translated by Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1950,1961: 661.
[63]Cole, D F, et al, Wright. Water requirement and its association with growth component and protein content of alfalfa. Crop Science,,1970,10: 237~240.
[64]Yan X, Lynch JP, Beebe SE. Phosphorus efficiency in common bean genotypes in contrasting soil types. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 1086~1099
[65]Nielsen KL, Lynch JP, Jablokow AG, Curtis PS. Carbon cost of root systems: an architectural approach. Plant Soil,1994,165: 161~169.
[66]郭彦军,徐恢仲,张家驊.紫花苜蓿根系形态学研究[J].西南农业大学学,2002,5(6): 484~486.
[67]Durand J L, Lemaire G, Gosse G, etal. Analyse deal conversion de Ienergie solaire enmatiere seche par un peuplement de Lucerne (Medicago sativa) soumisa undeficit hydrique. Agronomie,1989,9: 599~607.
[68]Bai W M, Li L H. Effect of irrigation methods and quota root water uptake and biomass of alfalfa in theWulanbuhe sandy region of China.Agricultural Water Management, 2003,62(2): 39~148.
[69]白文明,左强,黄元仿等乌兰布和沙区紫花苜蓿生长及吸水规律的研究[J],植物生态学报,2001, (1): 35~41.
[70]徐炳成,山仑.苜蓿和沙打旺苗期需水及其根冠比[J].草地学报,2003,11(1):78~82.
[71]Clausnitzer V, Hopmans J W. Simultaneous modeling of transient three-dimensional root growth and soil water flow. Plant Soil, 1994,164: 299~314.
[72]O'Toole J C, Bland W L.Genotypic variationin crop plant systems. Adv Agron, 1987,41: 91~145.
[73]罗志成.北方旱地农业研究的进展与思考[J ].干旱地区农业研究, 1994 ,12 (1): 4~13.
[74]Wang F,Li R,Wen Z Z.Survey of factors affecting eco-environmental benefits of cropland conversion[J]. Pratac Sci,2002,22(3):1~4
[75]Liu W H. An economic character of Longdong lucerne and its perspective of development. Pratac Sci, 1992,9(3): 71~73
[76]陈文,李琪,张小虎影响庆阳黄土高原苜蓿生产的现存因素及其解决途径,黄土高原农业系统国际学术会议论文集[C].兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社,1992,203-208.
[77]Wu R R,Zhang Z X,Cao Z Z.The Alfalfa germplasm resources and their outlook of breeding and selection on loess plateau of China. In:Ren J Z .Proceedings International Conference on Farming System on the Loess Plateau of China.Lanzhou:Gansu Science and Technology Press.1992,203-208.
[78]Frosheiser Fl,Barnes D K.Field and greenhouse selection for PRR resistance in Alfalfa.Crop Sci,1973,13:735-738.
[79]Nan Z B.Fungal diseases of cultivated grasses and forage legumes in loess plateau of eastern Gansu province. Pratac Sci, 1990,7(4): 30~34.
[80]Nan Z B, Li Q, Liu Z H.Evaluation of rust resistance in alfalfa germplasm under field condition. Pratac Sci,1991,8(2): 19~22.
[81]Sun J H,Chen J H.A study of vigour testing methods for alfalfa seed.Pratac Sci,1990,7(4): 55~57.
[82]Wu R R, Zhang Z X.The review and prospect of alfalfa scientific work on scientific work on loess plateau. Pratac Sci, 1988,5(2): 1~6.
[83]Zhang J X, Li S.A study on rational manure of the N and P for alfalfa, Pratac Sci,1990,7(4): 70~72.
[84]景蕊莲.作物抗旱研究的现状与思考[J].干旱地区农业研究,1996,17(2): 81~85.
[85]彭立新,李德全,束怀瑞.园艺植物干旱胁迫生理及耐旱机制研究进展[J].西北植物学报, 2002,221275~1281.
[86]韩德梁,王彦荣.紫花苜蓿对干旱胁迫适应性的研究进展[J].草业学报.2005, 14(6):7~13.
[87]张玉发,王庆锁,苏加楷.试论中国首蓓产业化[J].北京农业,2000,增刊: 5~10.
[88]韩瑞宏,卢欣石,高桂娟,杨秀娟.紫花苜蓿抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析[J].草地学报,2006,14(2):142~146.
[89]吴新卫,韩清芳,贾志宽.不同苜蓿品种根颈和根系形态学特性比较及根系发育能力[J].西北农业学报,2007,16(2):80~86.
[90]陈宝书.牧草栽培学[M].中国农业出版社,207~222.
[91]洪绂曾,吴义顺,于康富.根蘖型苜蓿引种研究[J].中国草业科学,1987,4(1): 1~4.
[92]刘文辉.陇东苜蓿的经济特性及其发展[J].草业科学,1992,9(3): 71~73.
[93]马其东,高振生,洪绂曾.不同苜蓿地方品种根系发育能力的评价与筛选[J].草业学报,1999,8(1):42~49.
[94]曹致中,贾笃敬,汪玺等,1990.根蘖型苜蓿的引种和育种.中国草地,(4):25~30
[95]高振生,谢雪菊,洪绂曾等,1996.苜蓿根蘖性状遗传规律的研究,草业学报,5(4):41~47
[96]Sprent J and L’T Mannetje 1996 The role of legumes in sustainable farming systems : past, present and future In : Younie D (ed) Legumes in Sustainable Farming Systems Occasional Symposium NO 30,British Grassland Society.
[97]储国良,王金洪等.丘陵地区发展苜蓿生产的前景与效益[J].江苏农业科学, 1998, (6): 58-60
[98]卢欣石.中国苜蓿产业化前景分析[M].北京:农业出版社2001,36~40.
[99]Depuit,E dward J; J G Coenenberg.Complementary grazing of reclaimed mined and native rangeland pastures in Montana In: Walker, D G;Powter,C B; Pole,M W, compilers Reclamation,a global perspective : Proceedings of the conference; 1989 August 27~31.
[100]杨吉华,张光灿.紫花苜蓿保持水土效益的研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1997,2(3):91~96.
[101]景蕊莲.作物抗旱研究的现状与思考[J].干旱地区农业研究,1996,17(2):81~85.
[102]彭立新,李德全,束怀瑞.园艺植物干旱胁迫生理及耐旱机制研究进展[J].西北植物学报, 2002,22(5): 1275~1281.
[103]韩德梁,王彦荣.紫花苜蓿对干旱胁迫适应性的研究进展[J].草业学报.2005,14(6):7~13.
[104]李世雄,王彦荣,孙建华.中国苜蓿品种种子产量性状的遗传多样性[J].草业学报,2003,12 (1): 23~29.
[105]中国科学院南京土壤研究所编.土壤理化分析[M].上海科学技术出版社,1978.
[106]王韶唐,荆家海,丁钟荣等.植物生理学实验指导[M].陕西科技出版社,1986.
[107]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[Ml.高等教育出版社,2000.
[108]Fridovich1. Superoxide dismutase, Annual Review Biochemistry, 44:147~159.
[109]杨国伟,张秀清,苏东海等.2004.水分胁迫下几种冷季型草坪草抗旱性研究[J].河南农业科学,1975,2:38~42
[110]Blum A, Ebercon A. Genotypic responses in sorghum to drought stress. 3free praline a ccumulation and drought resistance.CropScience, 1976, 16:428~431.
[111]王绑锡,黄久常,王辉.水分胁迫条件下不同植物体内脯氨酸积累与抗旱性的关系[J].植物生理学报,1989,15(1):46~51.
[112]韩建国,王云文,高洪文.紫花首稽的种子生产[J].首届中国苜蓿发展大会[C]北京:中国草学会北京市农村工作委员会,2001,21~25
[113]张慧如,王丽娟,郑蕊等.宁夏5种抗旱性牧草与脯氨酸含量的相关研究[J].宁夏农学院学报, 2001,22(6):12~14.
[114]李波,贾秀峰,白庆武等.干旱胁迫对脯氨酸积累的影响[J].植物研究, 2003,23(2 ):22~25.
[115]马宗仁,陈宝书.甘肃省地方苜蓿品种地理性分布与抗旱性的研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报, 1993,10(6):6~8
[116]周瑞莲,张承烈,金巨和.干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿叶片含水量、质膜透性SOD、CAT活性变化与抗旱性关系研究[J].中国草地, 1991,2:20~25
[117]李崇巍,贾志宽,林玲等.几种苜蓿新品种抗旱性的初步研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(2):21~25.
[118]井春喜,张怀刚,师生波等.土壤水分胁迫对不同耐旱性春小麦品种叶片色素含量的影响[J].西北植物学报, 2003,23(5):811~814.
[2]S.S.Ray.小麦根重分布模式的定量研究[J].国外农学-麦类作物,1994,(1):25~26.
[3]Schlesinger W H. Carbon sequestration in soils.Science,1999, 284: 20~95.
[4]Copley J. Ecology goes underground. Nature, 2000, 406: 452-454.
[5]Caldwell M M, Pearcy R W. Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants: Ecophysiological Processes Above and Below Ground. San Diego: Academic Press. 1994.
[6]Chapin F SⅢ, Ruess R W. The roots of the matter. Nature, 2001,4(11): 749~752.
[7]Weaver, J.E. Root development of field crops[M].McGraw-Hill,New York,1926.
[8]Schlesinger W H. Biogeochemistry: an Analysis of Global Change.San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press, 1997.
[9] Pregitzer K S, DeForest J L, Burton A J, et al. Fine root architecture of nine north American trees. Ecol Monogr, 2002, 72:293~309.
[10]Fitter AH. Characteristics and Function of root systems. In Y Waisel, A Eshel, Y Kafkafi, eds, Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. Marcel Dekker, NewYork,1995,3~25.
[11]罗远培,李韵珠等.根土系统与作物水氮资源利用效率.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1996
[12]Van Noordwij M, Vande Geijn S C. Root, shoot and parameters required for process-oriented models of crop growth limited by water or nutrients. Plant and Soil, 1996, 183:1~25
[13]Doussan C, Pages L, Vercamdre G. Modeling of the hydraulic architecture of root systems: Anintegrated approach to water absorption Model description. Annals of Botany,1998,81:213~223
[14]Lynch J.Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol, 1995,109: 7~13.
[15]Hacket C,Rose D A.Model of the extension and branching of aseminal root of ba rley,and its use in studying relations between root di mensions.I.The Model. Aust.J.BoilSci,1972,2 5:669~679.
[16]Hackket C, Bartlete B O.A study of the root system of barley.3.Branching pattenr.New Phytol, 1971, 70:409~413.
[17]Hackket C. A study of the root system of barley.Effects of nutrition on two varieties.New Phytol,1968,67: 287~-300.
[18]Fitter A H. The topology and geometry of plant root system influence of watering rate onroot systemt opology in Trifoliump ratense.Annals of Botany, 1986, 58: 91~101.
[19]苗玉新.大田作物根系研究法概述[J].黑龙江农业科学,2005 (3):50~52.
[20]管建慧,刘克礼,郭新宇.玉米根系构型的研究进展[J].玉米科学, 2006,14(6):162~166.
[21]Diggle A J.Rootmap Amodel in three-dimensional coordinates of the growth and structure of fibrous root system[J].Plant and Soil,1998,105:169~178.
[22]刘殿英,黄炳茹.土壤水分对冬小麦根系的影响[J].山东农业大学学报,1991,22(2): 103~110.
[23]郭正刚,张自和,侯扶江等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区不同紫花苜蓿品种间根系发育能力的研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8): 1007~1012.
[24]万素梅,胡守林,黄勤慧,王龙昌,赵书珍,胡建宏.不同紫花苜蓿品种根系发育能力的研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(11):2048~2052
[25]Paul W U,Thomas C K. Soil compaction and root growth[J].A Review,Agronomy Joumal,1994,86:759~766.
[26]孙启忠,韩建国,桂荣等.科尔沁沙地苜蓿根系和根颈特性[J].草地学报,2001,9(4):270~273
[27] Materechera S A. Penetration of very strong soil by seeding roots of different species[J].Plant and Soil,1991,135:31~41.
[28]Fitter A H.The characteristics and functions of root systems[A].In Plant Roots:The Hidden Half[M].Eds.Y Waisel,U Kafkafi,A Eshel.New York:Marcel Dekker Inc,1991.3~25
[29]刘凤芹,吴伟,刘秀萍等.林木根系结构动态模型压就[J].水土保持研究,2006,13:265~267
[30]Fitter A H, Stickland T R. Architectural analysis of plant root systemsⅡ. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species. New Phytol,1991,118:383~389.
[31]张富川.苜蓿对水分的需要量及原理研究[J].四川草原,1994, 2:17~21.
[32]曹仪植,宋占午.植物生理学[M]兰州大学出版社,1998.
[33]刘祖祺,张石城主编.植物抗旱生理学[M].中国农业出版社,1994.
[34]Marble V L. Fodders for the Near East: Alfalfa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,1989,47.
[35] Sinskaya E N. Flora of cultivated plants of the U.S.S.R.ⅧPerennial Legumes Plants. Part I. Medic, sweet clover, fenugreek. Translated by Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem,1950.
[36]Bolton J L, Goplenand B P, Baenziger H. Alfalfa. Sciand Technology, America SocietyAgronomy Wisconsin, 1972, 1~34.
[37]Lowe, Marble V L, Rumbaugh M D. Adapatation, varieties, and usuage.Monograph No, 15,Chapter,18. In alfalfa Science and Technology, 1972,391~413.
[38] AbdulJabbar A S, Sammis T W, Lugg D G. Effect of moisture level on the root pattern alfalfa. lirrigation Science,1982,3:197~207.
[39]. Waldron L R. North Dakota agricultural. Experiment Station Bull,1991,95: 391~424.
[40]李造哲.10种苜蓿品种幼苗抗早性研的究[J].中国草地,1991,3:1~3.
[41]程伟燕,张卫国,哈斯其木格等.紫花苜蓿的形态解剖学观察[J].内蒙古民族大学学报,2003,6:251-254.
[42]李崇巍,贾志宽,林玲等.几种苜蓿新品种抗旱性的初步研究[J].干旱地区农业研究2002,20(4): 21~25.
[43]汤章程.逆境条件下植物脯氨酸的积累及其的意义[J].植物生理学通讯,1984,(1):15~21.
[44]Neumann P M.The role of cell wall adjustment in plant resistance to water deficit.Crop Science,1995,35:(5): 1258~1266.
[45]彭立新,李德全,束怀瑞.园艺植物干旱胁迫生理及耐旱机制研究进展[J].西北植物学报,2002,22(5): 1275~1281.
[46]Papadakis A K, Roubelakis-angelakis K A. Oxidative stress could be responsible for the recalcitrance of plant protoplasts. Plant physiology and Biochemistry,2002,40(68):549~559.
[47]谭云,叶庆生,李玲.植物抗旱过程中ABA生理作用的研究进展[J].植物学通报,2001,18(2): 197~201.
[48]Kidambi S P. Matches A G, Bolger T P. Mineral concentrations in alfalfa and sainfoin as influenced by soil moisture level. Agronomy Journal, 1990, 82:229~236.
[49]Deetz D A, Jung H G, Buxton D R. Water deficit effect on cell wall composition and in vitro degradability of structural polysaccharides. Crop Science,1996,36:383~388.
[50]Duru, M, Langlet, A. Effects de la competition pour la lumiere et dudeficit eneau sur levolution du rapport feuille/tige de la luzerne. Fourrages, 1993,134:199~204.
[51]韩清芳.不同苜蓿品种抗逆性、生产性能及品质特性研究.西北农林科技大学博士论文. 2003,P45,90~100.
[52]黎裕.作物抗旱鉴定方法与指标[J].干旱地区农业研究,1993,11(1): 91~99.
[53]陶玲.1998.甘肃省紫花苜蓿地方类型抗旱性综合评判[J].草业学报,7(2): 57~61.
[54]徐云碧,朱立煌著.分子数量遗传学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994,1~9.
[55]Nobel PS. Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physioligy. Academic Press San Diego,1991.
[56]Doussan C, Pages L, Vercamdre G.Modeling of the hydraulic architecture of root systems: Anintegrated approach to water absorption -Model description.Annals of Botany,1998,81: 213~223.
[57]St. Aubin G, Canny MJ, McCully ME. Living vessel elements in the late metaxylemof sheathed maize roots. Ann Bot, 1986,58: 577~588.
[58]Wenzel C L, McCully M E, Canny M J. Development of water conducting capacity in the root systems of young plants of corn and some other C4 grasses. Plant Physiol, 1989,89: 1049~1101.
[59]McCully M E. Accumulation of high levels of potassium in the developing xylemelements in roots soybean and some other dicotyledons. Protoplasma,1994,183:116~125.
[60]Wang X L, McCully M E, Canny M J.The water status of the roots of soil-grown maize in relation to the maturity of their xylem. Plant Physiol, 1991,82:157~162.
[61]Varney G T, Canny M J. Rates of water uptake into the mature root system of maize plants. New Phytologist, 1993, 123: 775~786.
[62]Sinskaya E N. Flora of cultivated plants of the U.S.S.R.ⅧPerennial Legumes Plants. Part I. Medic, sweet clover, fenugreek.Translated by Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1950,1961: 661.
[63]Cole, D F, et al, Wright. Water requirement and its association with growth component and protein content of alfalfa. Crop Science,,1970,10: 237~240.
[64]Yan X, Lynch JP, Beebe SE. Phosphorus efficiency in common bean genotypes in contrasting soil types. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 1086~1099
[65]Nielsen KL, Lynch JP, Jablokow AG, Curtis PS. Carbon cost of root systems: an architectural approach. Plant Soil,1994,165: 161~169.
[66]郭彦军,徐恢仲,张家驊.紫花苜蓿根系形态学研究[J].西南农业大学学,2002,5(6): 484~486.
[67]Durand J L, Lemaire G, Gosse G, etal. Analyse deal conversion de Ienergie solaire enmatiere seche par un peuplement de Lucerne (Medicago sativa) soumisa undeficit hydrique. Agronomie,1989,9: 599~607.
[68]Bai W M, Li L H. Effect of irrigation methods and quota root water uptake and biomass of alfalfa in theWulanbuhe sandy region of China.Agricultural Water Management, 2003,62(2): 39~148.
[69]白文明,左强,黄元仿等乌兰布和沙区紫花苜蓿生长及吸水规律的研究[J],植物生态学报,2001, (1): 35~41.
[70]徐炳成,山仑.苜蓿和沙打旺苗期需水及其根冠比[J].草地学报,2003,11(1):78~82.
[71]Clausnitzer V, Hopmans J W. Simultaneous modeling of transient three-dimensional root growth and soil water flow. Plant Soil, 1994,164: 299~314.
[72]O'Toole J C, Bland W L.Genotypic variationin crop plant systems. Adv Agron, 1987,41: 91~145.
[73]罗志成.北方旱地农业研究的进展与思考[J ].干旱地区农业研究, 1994 ,12 (1): 4~13.
[74]Wang F,Li R,Wen Z Z.Survey of factors affecting eco-environmental benefits of cropland conversion[J]. Pratac Sci,2002,22(3):1~4
[75]Liu W H. An economic character of Longdong lucerne and its perspective of development. Pratac Sci, 1992,9(3): 71~73
[76]陈文,李琪,张小虎影响庆阳黄土高原苜蓿生产的现存因素及其解决途径,黄土高原农业系统国际学术会议论文集[C].兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社,1992,203-208.
[77]Wu R R,Zhang Z X,Cao Z Z.The Alfalfa germplasm resources and their outlook of breeding and selection on loess plateau of China. In:Ren J Z .Proceedings International Conference on Farming System on the Loess Plateau of China.Lanzhou:Gansu Science and Technology Press.1992,203-208.
[78]Frosheiser Fl,Barnes D K.Field and greenhouse selection for PRR resistance in Alfalfa.Crop Sci,1973,13:735-738.
[79]Nan Z B.Fungal diseases of cultivated grasses and forage legumes in loess plateau of eastern Gansu province. Pratac Sci, 1990,7(4): 30~34.
[80]Nan Z B, Li Q, Liu Z H.Evaluation of rust resistance in alfalfa germplasm under field condition. Pratac Sci,1991,8(2): 19~22.
[81]Sun J H,Chen J H.A study of vigour testing methods for alfalfa seed.Pratac Sci,1990,7(4): 55~57.
[82]Wu R R, Zhang Z X.The review and prospect of alfalfa scientific work on scientific work on loess plateau. Pratac Sci, 1988,5(2): 1~6.
[83]Zhang J X, Li S.A study on rational manure of the N and P for alfalfa, Pratac Sci,1990,7(4): 70~72.
[84]景蕊莲.作物抗旱研究的现状与思考[J].干旱地区农业研究,1996,17(2): 81~85.
[85]彭立新,李德全,束怀瑞.园艺植物干旱胁迫生理及耐旱机制研究进展[J].西北植物学报, 2002,221275~1281.
[86]韩德梁,王彦荣.紫花苜蓿对干旱胁迫适应性的研究进展[J].草业学报.2005, 14(6):7~13.
[87]张玉发,王庆锁,苏加楷.试论中国首蓓产业化[J].北京农业,2000,增刊: 5~10.
[88]韩瑞宏,卢欣石,高桂娟,杨秀娟.紫花苜蓿抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析[J].草地学报,2006,14(2):142~146.
[89]吴新卫,韩清芳,贾志宽.不同苜蓿品种根颈和根系形态学特性比较及根系发育能力[J].西北农业学报,2007,16(2):80~86.
[90]陈宝书.牧草栽培学[M].中国农业出版社,207~222.
[91]洪绂曾,吴义顺,于康富.根蘖型苜蓿引种研究[J].中国草业科学,1987,4(1): 1~4.
[92]刘文辉.陇东苜蓿的经济特性及其发展[J].草业科学,1992,9(3): 71~73.
[93]马其东,高振生,洪绂曾.不同苜蓿地方品种根系发育能力的评价与筛选[J].草业学报,1999,8(1):42~49.
[94]曹致中,贾笃敬,汪玺等,1990.根蘖型苜蓿的引种和育种.中国草地,(4):25~30
[95]高振生,谢雪菊,洪绂曾等,1996.苜蓿根蘖性状遗传规律的研究,草业学报,5(4):41~47
[96]Sprent J and L’T Mannetje 1996 The role of legumes in sustainable farming systems : past, present and future In : Younie D (ed) Legumes in Sustainable Farming Systems Occasional Symposium NO 30,British Grassland Society.
[97]储国良,王金洪等.丘陵地区发展苜蓿生产的前景与效益[J].江苏农业科学, 1998, (6): 58-60
[98]卢欣石.中国苜蓿产业化前景分析[M].北京:农业出版社2001,36~40.
[99]Depuit,E dward J; J G Coenenberg.Complementary grazing of reclaimed mined and native rangeland pastures in Montana In: Walker, D G;Powter,C B; Pole,M W, compilers Reclamation,a global perspective : Proceedings of the conference; 1989 August 27~31.
[100]杨吉华,张光灿.紫花苜蓿保持水土效益的研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1997,2(3):91~96.
[101]景蕊莲.作物抗旱研究的现状与思考[J].干旱地区农业研究,1996,17(2):81~85.
[102]彭立新,李德全,束怀瑞.园艺植物干旱胁迫生理及耐旱机制研究进展[J].西北植物学报, 2002,22(5): 1275~1281.
[103]韩德梁,王彦荣.紫花苜蓿对干旱胁迫适应性的研究进展[J].草业学报.2005,14(6):7~13.
[104]李世雄,王彦荣,孙建华.中国苜蓿品种种子产量性状的遗传多样性[J].草业学报,2003,12 (1): 23~29.
[105]中国科学院南京土壤研究所编.土壤理化分析[M].上海科学技术出版社,1978.
[106]王韶唐,荆家海,丁钟荣等.植物生理学实验指导[M].陕西科技出版社,1986.
[107]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[Ml.高等教育出版社,2000.
[108]Fridovich1. Superoxide dismutase, Annual Review Biochemistry, 44:147~159.
[109]杨国伟,张秀清,苏东海等.2004.水分胁迫下几种冷季型草坪草抗旱性研究[J].河南农业科学,1975,2:38~42
[110]Blum A, Ebercon A. Genotypic responses in sorghum to drought stress. 3free praline a ccumulation and drought resistance.CropScience, 1976, 16:428~431.
[111]王绑锡,黄久常,王辉.水分胁迫条件下不同植物体内脯氨酸积累与抗旱性的关系[J].植物生理学报,1989,15(1):46~51.
[112]韩建国,王云文,高洪文.紫花首稽的种子生产[J].首届中国苜蓿发展大会[C]北京:中国草学会北京市农村工作委员会,2001,21~25
[113]张慧如,王丽娟,郑蕊等.宁夏5种抗旱性牧草与脯氨酸含量的相关研究[J].宁夏农学院学报, 2001,22(6):12~14.
[114]李波,贾秀峰,白庆武等.干旱胁迫对脯氨酸积累的影响[J].植物研究, 2003,23(2 ):22~25.
[115]马宗仁,陈宝书.甘肃省地方苜蓿品种地理性分布与抗旱性的研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报, 1993,10(6):6~8
[116]周瑞莲,张承烈,金巨和.干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿叶片含水量、质膜透性SOD、CAT活性变化与抗旱性关系研究[J].中国草地, 1991,2:20~25
[117]李崇巍,贾志宽,林玲等.几种苜蓿新品种抗旱性的初步研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(2):21~25.
[118]井春喜,张怀刚,师生波等.土壤水分胁迫对不同耐旱性春小麦品种叶片色素含量的影响[J].西北植物学报, 2003,23(5):811~814.