欺骗任务训练对学前儿童心理理论的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
选取郑州市高新区科学幼儿园中班和大班共203名儿童作为被试,用两个经典的错误信念任务(意外地点任务和意外内容任务)进行前测,筛选出能通过语言和控制问题但在两个经典任务上均没有获得满分的儿童共111名,随机分到四个组:家长训练组、教师训练组、实验人员训练组和对照组。家长训练组由家长在家里对孩子进行干预,教师训练组由教师在教室里对孩子进行干预,实验人员训练组由实验人员即心理学研究生在幼儿园活动室进行训练。三个训练组训练材料相同,都是欺骗游戏任务。前测一周后进行为期两周的“一对一”训练,每周包括两个训练环节,每次进行15分钟左右,训练结束一周后进行后测。对照组和训练组同时进行前测和后测,但不对其进行干预训练。最终得到95名有效被试的数据。本研究条件下得到的结果如下:
     (1)在心理理论任务总成绩上,训练组前后测的比较、训练组和对照组后测的比较,以及训练组对照组前后测差值的比较得到,以欺骗任务作为干预材料能促进儿童心理理论的发展,学前儿童心理理论可以经过训练显著提高;
     (2)在后测心理理论任务总成绩上,三个训练组间不存在显著差异,但都显著高于对照组;在后测意外地点任务成绩上,教师组显著高于对照组,其他两两组间差异不显著;在后测意外内容任务成绩上,除了三个训练组都显著高于对照组外,还得到家长组显著高于实验人员组;
     (3)组别和年级间存在交互作用,家长训练组的大班儿童被试与中班儿童被试在后测心理理论总任务上不存在显著差异,教师训练组、实验人员训练组和对照组的大班儿童的后测心理理论总成绩都显著高于中班儿童。
203pre-school children (the middle and top class) from high-tech district of Zhengzhou were selected as the subject, among which111children who passed the language control problem and didn't get full marks in the pretest tasks (unexpected location task and unexpected contents task) were screened out. The111children were allocated randomly into4groups, namely, parent-training group, teacher-training group, experimenter-training group and control group.
     The children in parents-training group were intervened by their parents at home, the children in teacher-training group by their teacher in the classroom, and the children in experimenter-training group by graduate students majoring in psychology in kindergarten activity room. The training materials of the three training groups were games of deception task. And the training was conducted1week later after the pretest with the way of one-to-one,15minutes each time, and twice each week, which lasted2weeks. The posttest was carried out a week later. Without intervention, the control group children took the pre-test and post-test at the same time with the trained group. At last, there were95effective subjects in the case of our study, and the results were as follows:
     (1)In the total theory of mind, comparison of training groups at pretest and posttest, comparison of training groups and control group at posttest, comparison of training groups and control group at difference of pretest and posttest, these comparisons can obtained that The intervention materials of deception task can promote the development of children's theory of mind, which can be improved significantly by training;
     (2)There are no significant differences among the3training groups in the total theory of mind, but all of them are higher than controlled group significantly; the teacher-training group is significantly higher than controlled group, and no significant differences exist between the other groups on unexpected location task. The3training groups are significantly higher than the controlled group, and the parents-training group is significantly higher than the experimenter-training group on the task of unexpected contents;
     (3)There is an interaction between training groups and grades. There are no significant differences on total task of the theory of mind between parents-training group in the top class and the middle class. Besides, the total score of theory of mind of the top class children on teacher-training group, experimenter-training group and the controlled group in the post-test is significantly higher than the middle class children.
引文
[1]Wellman, H. m. Cross, D. & Watson, J. Meta-analysis of theory of mind development:The truth about false belief [J]. Child Development,2001, (72):655-684
    [2]Astington J, Gopnik A. Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance reality distinction [J]. Child Development,1988,59:26-37
    [3]Happe F G, Winner E. The getting wisdom:Theory of mind in old age[J]. Child Development,1998,34:358-362
    [4]Flavell J H. Cognitive development:Children's knowledge about the mind[J]. AnnualReview Psychology,1999,50:21-45
    [5]Premack D, Woodruff G. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? [J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1978,1:515-526
    [6]Flavell JH. Cognitive development:children's knowledge about the mind[J]. Annual Review of Psychology,1999,50:21-45
    [7]Wellman H M, Gelman S A.. Cognitive development:Foundational theories of coredomains [J]. Annual of Review Psychology,1992,43:337-375
    [8]Holmes H A, Black C, Miller S A. A cross-talk comparison of false belief understanding in a head start population [J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1996,63:263-285
    [9]Wimmer H, Perner J.. Beliefs about beliefs:representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception [J]. Cognition,1983,13: 103-128
    [10]Hogre G J, Wimmer H, Perner J. Ignorance versus false belief:a developmental lag in attribution of epistemic states [J]. Child Development,1986,57:567-582
    [11]Flavell J, Green F, Flavell E. The development of knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction [J]. Monographs of the Society for Research In Child Development,1986, 51:1-68
    [12]Flavell J.H. The development of children's knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction [J]. American Psychologist,1986,41:418-425
    [13]Call J, Tomasello M. A nonverbal false belief task:The performance of children and great apes [J]. Child Development,1999,70 (2):381-395
    [14]Bloom, P., & German, T. P. Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind [J]. Cognition,2000,77 (1),25-31
    [15]李艳玲,陈英和.3-5岁儿童错误信念理解能力的发展趋势[J].心理发展与教育,2009,(2):1-7
    [16]王益文,林崇德,张文新.外表真实区别、表征变化和错误信念的任务分析[J].心理科学,2003,26(3):390-392
    [17]邓赐平,桑标.不同任务情境对幼儿心理理论表现的影响[J].心理科学,2003(2):272-275
    [18]王益文,林崇德.“心理理论”的实验任务与研究趋向[J].心理学探新,2004,23(3):30-34
    [19]Wellman, H. The child's Theory of Mind[M]. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press,1990:133
    [20]Chris M. Theories of mind in infancy British Journal of Developments [J]. Psychology. 1996,14:19-40
    [21]Leslie, A. M. Pretending and believing:Issues in the theory of ToMM[J]. Cognition,1994, 50:211-238
    [22]Harris, P. L. Children and Imagination[M]. Malden, Mass.:Blackwell,2000:238
    [23]王益文,张文新.3-6岁儿童“心理理论”的发展[J].心理发展与教育,2002,1:11-15
    [24]陈英和,姚端伟,郭向和.儿童心理理论的发展及其影响因素的研究进展[J].心理发展与教育,2001,(3):56-59
    [25]刘明,邓赐平,桑标.幼儿心理理论与社会行为发展关系的初步研究[J].心理发展与教育,2002,2:39-42
    [26]杨伶,兰继军.假装游戏与心理理论关系新探:3种对象假装的证据[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2011,19(7):826-828
    [27]莫书亮,陶莉莉,贾蒙蒙,等.3-5岁儿童的攻击—破坏行为与心理理论、气质的关系[J].心理研究,2012,5(1):28-32
    [28]Wellman H M, Lane J D, LaBounty J, et al. Observant, nonaggressive temperament predicts theory of mind development [J]. Developmental Science,2011,14(2):319-326
    [29]苏彦捷,刘艳春.亲子交流与儿童心理理论的获得和发展:文化的视角[J].心理科学进展,2012,20(3):317-327
    [30]苏彦捷,覃婷立.亲子谈话和儿童心理理论获得与发展的关系[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2010,36(3):1-6
    [31]商冲晨,莫书亮.家庭微系统对幼儿心理理论的影响_因素_过程和机制[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(6):914-925
    [32]张长英,桑标,马伟娜.对话环境与心理理论发展[J].心理发展与教育,2008(4):125-128
    [33]马娥.回族幼儿心理理论发展的实验研究[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版),2011,24(8):56-59
    [34]张玉萍,苏彦捷.混龄编班对四岁儿童心理理论发展的影响[J].心理科学,2007,30(6):1397-1401
    [35]刘文,魏玉枝.混龄教育中幼儿心理理论与创造性人格的关系[J].学前教育研究,2010(8):33-38
    [36]王斯,苏彦捷.儿童面对不同对象的公平性选择:心理理论的作用[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2011,37(4):26-32
    [37]Moore C. Fairness in Children's Resource Allocation Depends on the Recipient [J]. Psychological Science,2009,20(8):944-948
    [38]Takagishi H, Kameshima S, Schug J, Koizumi M, Yamagishi T. Theory of Mind Enhances Preference for Fairness [J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,2010,105 (1-2): 130-137
    [39]徐伟,王惠萍.儿童解释性心理理论研究述评[J].鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,28(3):93-96
    [40]徐伟,韩仁生.5-7岁儿童解释性心理理论的发展[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(2):207-210
    [41]王彦,苏彦捷.5-8岁儿童心理理论各成分的发展及其关系[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2008,44(4):639-646
    [42]Lalonde CE, Chandler MJ. Children's understanding of interpretation [J]. New Ideas in Psychology,2002,20 (2-3):163-198
    [43]陈友庆.儿童心理理论[M].安徽人民出版社,2008,155-156
    [44]Flavell J, Everett BA, Corft K,Flavell E. Young children's knowledge about visual perception:further evidence for the level 1-level 2 distinction [J]. Developmental Psychology,1981,17:99-103
    [45]Flavell J. Green F, Flavell E. The development of knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction [J]. Monographs of the Society for Research In Child Development,1986, 51:1-68
    [46]Taylor M, Hort B. Can children be trained in making the distinction between appearance and reality? [J]. Cognitive Development,1990,5:89-99
    [47]Meredith K, Tony C. Teaching false belief and visual perspective taking skills in young children:can a theory of mind be trained? [J]. Child Study Journal,2000,30(4):273-302
    [48]Slaughter V, Gopnik A. Conceptual coherence in the child's theory of mind:training children to understand belief [J]. Child Development,1996,67:2967-2988
    [49]Gopnik A, Slaughter V, MettzoffA. Changing your views:how understanding visual perception can load to a new theory of mind [J]. In Lewis C and Miechell P (Eds), children's early understanding of mind. Hill lsdale, NJ:Erlbaum,1994,157-181
    [50]Appleton M, Reddy V. Teaching three year olds to pass false belief tests:a conversational approach[J]. Social Development,1996,5:275-291
    [51]Aughter V. Children's understanding of pictorial and mental representations [J]. Child Development,1998,69:321-332
    [52]Guajardo N R, Watson A C. Narrative discourse and theory of minddevelopment[J]. Journal of Genetic Psychology,2002,1633:305-326
    [53]Peskin J, Astington J W. The effects of adding metacognitive language to story texts [J]. Cognitive Development,2004,19:253-273
    [54]Santiesteban, L, White, S., Cook, J., Gilbert, S. J., Heyes, C.,... Bird, GTraining social cognition:from imitation to Theory of Mind[J]. Cognition,2012,122 (2),228-235
    [55]杨伶,兰继军.学前儿童心理理论发展的干预策略[J].学前教育研究,2011,(8):45-49
    [56]王赞,杨宁.假装游戏对幼儿心理理论发展的影响[J].学前教育研究,2010(2):46-51
    [57]杨娟,周世杰,唐志红.孤独症儿童心理理论训练的个案研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2008,16(4):436-439
    [58]Baron-Cohen S. Leslie A, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a"theory of mind"? [J]. Cognition,1985,21:37-46
    [59]Jessica Paynter, C. C. P. Further evidence of benefits of thought-bubble training for theory of mind development in children with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders,2013,7:344-348
    [60]Goldstein, Thalia R.,Winner,Ellen. Enhancing Empathy and Theory of Mind.[J]. Journal of Cognition and Development,2012,13(1):19-37
    [61]Amsterlaw, J., & Wellman, H. M. Theories of mind in transition:A microgenetic study of the development of false beliefunderstanding. J ournat of Cognition and Development, 2006,7,139-172
    [62]邓赐平,刘明.从假装到心理表征理论:假装认识训练的影响[J].心理发展与教育,2008,8(3):1-8
    [63]Chandler, Michael, Fritz, A. S., & Hala, S. Small scale deceit:Deception as a marker of Theories of Mind[J]. Child Development,1989,60 (6),1263-1277
    [64]刘秀丽.车文博.西方关于欺骗研究的新进展[J].心理科学,2005,1
    [65]Hala, S., Chandler, M. & Fritz, A. S. Fledgling theories of mind:Deception as a marker of 3-year-olds'understanding of false belief [J]. Child Development,1991,61:83~97
    [66]Lewis, C. & Osborne, A. Three-year-olds'problem with false beliefs:Conceptual deficit or linguistic artifact?[J]. Child Development,1990,61:1514-1519
    [67]Wilson, A.E., Smith, M.D. & Ross, H.S. The nature and effects of young children's lies[J]. Social Development,2003,12(1):21-45
    [68]Ritblatt, S. N. Children's level of participation in a false belief task, age, and theory of mind [J]. The Journal of Genetic Psychology,2000,161(1):53-64
    [69]Perner, J., Leekam, S. R. & Wimmer, H. Three-year-olds'difficulty with false belief:The case for a conceptual deficit[J]. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1987, 5:125-137
    [70]Ruffinan T., Olson, D. R., Ash, T. & Keenan, T. The ABCs of deception:do young children understand deception the same way as adults?[J]. Developmental Psychology,1993, 29:74-87
    [71]刘秀丽,车文博.学前儿童欺骗及欺骗策略发展的研究[J].心理发展与教育,2006(4):1-7
    [72]Polak A., Harris,P.L. Deception by young children following noncompliance [J]. Developmental Psychology,1999,35:561-568
    [73]邱小艳,曹中平.欺骗对中国儿童误信念理解的影响[J].湖南科技学院学报,2008(8):197-199
    [74]Sullivan K, Winner E. Children's Understanding of False Belief In Trick Condition[J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1991,56:135-148
    [75]史冰,苏彦捷.儿童欺骗的情境依赖[J].心理科学,2005,28(4):816-819
    [76]史冰,苏彦捷.儿童面对不同对象的欺骗表现及其相关的社会性特点[J].心理学报,2007,39(1):111-117
    [77]陈静欣,苏彦捷.欺骗对象对4-6岁儿童欺骗意图理解的影响[C].第十届全国心理学学术大会,中国上海,2005
    [78]刘秀丽,车文博.学前儿童欺骗的阶段性发展的实验研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(6):1340-1345
    [79]刘秀丽.学前儿童心理理论及欺骗发展的关系研究[J].心理发展与教育,2005,(4):13-18
    [80]李艳艳,桑标.亲子互动中游戏参与方式_情感交流和儿童心理理论的关系[J].心理发展与教育,2006,12(1):7-12
    [81]张丽锦,吴南,郑砚.不同形式的语言介入对汉语儿童心理理论发展的干预[J].心理学报,2008,40(7):819-827
    [82]郭力平,冯君萍.早期儿童的游戏与心理理论的发展[J].心理科学,2003,26(5):804-807
    [83]Amsterlaw J & Wellman H.M. Theories of mind in transition:A micro-genetic study of the development of false belief understanding [J]. Journal of Cognition and Development. 2006, (7):139-172
    [84]邓赐平.幼儿心理理论的发展及其表征机制的研究[D].博士学位论文,上海:华东师范大学,2001
    [85]王丽.训练对3-4岁儿童心理理论发展影响的实验研究[D].硕士学位论文.昆明:云南师范大学,2006
    [86]赵晓玲.不同训练对学前儿童心理理论的影响[D].河北师范大学,2008

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700