两类模糊判断矩阵的一致性及其应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
层次分析法(The Analytic Hierarchy Process,简称AHP)作为一种定性和定量相结合的有效决策方法,其在社会、经济、管理、及工程等领域有着广泛的应用。随着AHP理论的发展和实际应用的需要,人们考虑在模糊环境下的层次分析法,提出了模糊层次分析法(FAHP)。近年来,有关FAHP的理论研究是人们关注的一个重要方向。
     本文对FAHP中两类模糊判断矩阵的一致性及其应用等方面进行研究和探讨,主要研究内容和成果如下:
     第一章介绍了有关决策的基本概念,阐述了AHP的基本原理,分析了FAHP的产生背景及FAHP中两类模糊判断矩阵的一致性存在的主要问题,并提出本文所要研究的内容。
     第二章在已有的两类模糊数判断矩阵的一致性定义及分析它们存在的问题的基础上,提出了两类模糊判断矩阵新的一致性定义,进一步丰富和完善FAHP理论。
     第三章根据两类模糊判断矩阵新的一致性定义,对两类一致性模糊判断矩阵之间的转换关系进行研究。
     第四章,综述了AHP主要思想及基于两类判断矩阵确定方案优先权重方法,并针对用层次分析法对方案排序存在的问题,通过确定具有一致性实正互反判断矩阵元素与优先权重及参数的新逻辑关系,以及确定具有一致性实互补判断矩阵元素与权重及参数的新逻辑关系,提出层次分析法中确定方案优先权重的新参数方法,
     第五章,针对决策者给出的区间数互反判断矩阵、区间数互补判断矩阵、三角模糊数互补判断矩阵分别给出了它们的不确定性属性层次模型。
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is an effective decision method which combines with qualitative and quantitative analysis. It has been widely applied to society, economy, management and engineering. With the development of AHP theory and the actual requirement of applications, people consider AHP with fuzzy environment and develop a new theory method - Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP). The research of FAHP is an important direction for discussion in recently years.
     This paper studies the theory and application of the consistency of two kinds of fuzzy judgment matrices in FAHP. The main content and achievement of this paper are as follows:
     Chapter 1 introduces some basic concepts on decision making. The basic theory of AHP is briefly reviewed. It analyzes the forming background of AHP and the main existent problems of the consistency of two kinds of fuzzy judgment matrices in FAHP. The main research contents in this paper are also presented.
     In chapter 2, based on the existing definitions of two kinds of fuzzy judgment matrices and the main existent problems of these definitions, the new definitions of two kinds of fuzzy judgment matrices are proposed, which are supplements and enrichment of FAHP.
     In chapter 3, according to the new consistency definitions, the text studies the new transformation relations of two kinds of consistent fuzzy judgment matrices.
     In chapter 4, the main ideas of AHP and the existent method to determine priorities based on two kinds of fuzzy judgment matrices are reviewed. Aiming at the existent problem of AHP for ranking alternatives, a new parameter approach to determine priorities in AHP is proposed, which through determine the logical relation of elements of consistent reciprocal judgment matrix with priority and the parameterand the logical relation of elements of consistent complementary judgment matrix with priority and the parameter.
     In chapter 5, with regard to interval reciprocal judgment matrix, interval complementary judgment matrix and triangle fuzzy number judgment matrix given by decision maker, uncertain attribute hierarchical models are proposed respectively.
引文
[1]彭勇行.管理决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
    [2]杨自厚,李宝泽.多指标决策理论与方法[M].沈阳:东北工学院出版社,1989.
    [3]冯尚友.多目标决策理论方法与应用[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1990.
    [4]胡毓达.实用多目标最优化[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990.
    [5]李荣均.模糊多准则决策理论与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.
    [6]Fandel G,Gal T.Multiple criteria decision making:theory and applications[M].New York:Spring-Verlag,1980.
    [7]Hwang C L,Masud A S M.Multiobjective decision making-methods and application,a stste-of-the-art survey[M].New York:Spring-Vergas,1978.
    [8]Hwang C L,Yoon K S.Multiple attribute decision making[M].Berlin:Spring-Verlag,1981.
    [9]夏绍玮等.系统工程概论[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1994.
    [10]T.L.Saaty.Modeling Unstructured Decision Problems-the Theory of Analytical Hierarchies[J].Math.Compute.Simulation,1978,20,147-158.
    [11]肖四汉,樊治平,王梦光.Fuzzy判断矩阵的一致性研究[J].系统工程学报,2001,16(2):142-145.
    [12]徐泽水.AHP中两类标度的关系研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997.19(7):97-101.
    [13]张吉军.模糊层次分析法(FAHP)[J].模糊系统与数学,2000,14(2):80-88.
    [14]徐泽水.判断矩阵一致性修正的新方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2000,(4):86-89.
    [15]徐泽水.互补判断矩阵的两种排序方法—权的最小平方法及特征向量法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,(7):71-75.
    [16]Z P Fan,J Ma,Q Zhang.An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003,131:101-106.
    [17] J C Leyva-Lopez,E F_andez-Gonzalez. A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2003,148: 14-27.
    [18] Miroslaw Kwiesielewicz, Ewa van Uden. Inconsistent and contradictory judgments in pairwise comparison method in the AHP [J].Computers & Operations Research, 2004, 31: 713-719.
    [19] Q Zhang, Jason C. H. Chen, P. Pete Chong. Decision consolidation: criteria weight determination using multiple preference formats[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2004, 38: 247-258.
    [20] Z P Fan, G F Hu, Si-Han Xiao. A method for multiple attribute decision-making with fuzzy preference relation on alternatives[J].Computers &Industrial Engineering, 2004,46:321 -327.
    [21] Z P Fan, ,Si-Han Xiao, G F Hu. An optimization method for integrating two kinds of preference information in group decision-making[J].Computers &Industrial Engineering, 2004,46:359-335.
    [22] E Fernadez, J C Leyva. A method based on multiobjective optimization for deriving a ranking from a fuzzy preference relation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004,154: 110-124.
    [23] E Fernadez,R Olmedo. An agent model based on ideas of concordance and discordance for group randing problems[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2005, 39: 429-443.
    [24] Y M Wang, C Parkan. Multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives: Ranking and weighting[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2005,153:331-346.
    [25] Y M Wang, Z P Fan, Zhongsheng Hua. A chi-square method for obtaining a priority vector from multiplication and fuzzy preference relations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, doi:10.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.020.
    [26] P. Ya. Ekelt, M. R. Silva,F. Schuffner Neto. Fuzzy preference modeling and its application to multiobjective decision making[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Application, 2006, 52: 179-196.
    [27] Z P Fan, J Ma, Y P Jiang, Yong-Hong Sun, A goal programming approach to group decision making based on multiplicative preference relations and fuzzy preference relation [J] .European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174:311-321.
    [28] Qzerk Gogus, Thomas O. Boucher. Strong transitivity, rationality and weak monotonicity in fuzzy pairwise comparisons [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1998(94): 133-144.
    [29] Sengupta A, Pal T K. On comparing interval numbers [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2000,127:28-43.
    [30] K. Sugihara, H. Ishii, H. Tanaka. Interval evaluations to inconsistent judgments in analytic hierarchy process, in Proceedings of the 3rd Czech-Japan Seminar on Data Analysis and Decision Making under Uncertainty, Osaka, October 2000, pp. 97-103.
    [31] H. Tanaka, K. Sugihara,Y. Maeda. Non-additive measures by interval probability functions, Proceedings of International Workshop on Rough Set Theory and Granular Computing, 2001, pp. 63-67.
    [32] Kazutomi Sugihara, Hiroaki Ishii, Hideo Tanaka. Interval priorities in AHP by interval regression analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004, 158:745-754.
    
    [33] Ying-Ming Wang, Jian-Bo Yang, Dong-Ling Xu. A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2005(152):475-498.
    [34] Ying-Ming Wang, Jian-Bo Yang, Dong-Ling Xu. Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation,2005,167 :252-273.
    [35] Wan Yucheng, Ma Baoguo, S 俄 lued judgments[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics , 2006,17 (1), 115-120.
    [36] R. Csutora, J. J. Buckley. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lamda-Max method[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2001(129):48-64.
    [37]S Bodjanova.Median value and median interval of a fuzzy number[J].Information Science,2005(172):73-89.
    [38]X W Liu.On the maximum entropy parameterized interval approximation of fuzzy numbers[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006(157):869-878.
    [39]R R.Yagera,Z S Xu.The continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and its application to decision making[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006(157):1393-1402.
    [40]徐泽水,达庆利.一种基于可能度的区间数判断矩阵排序法[J].中国管理科学,2003,11(1):63-65.
    [41]刘清君,邹小梅.区间数层次分析法及其应用[J]系统工程,2005,23(5):120-123.
    [42]翟晓燕,张新政.群决策中区间数判断矩阵的集结及权重的计算[J].系统工程,2005,23(9):103-107.
    [43]周宏安,刘三阳,李炳杰.基于目标规划和相对优势度的区间数互反判断矩阵排序法[J].数学的实践与认识,2006,36(6):63-67.
    [44]J.Bondia,J.Pic\'{'o}.Analysis.of linear systems with fuzzy parametric uncertainty[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2003(135):81-121.
    [45]Mikhailov L.Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises[J].Omega,2002,30(5):393-401.
    [46]Mikhailov L.Deriving priorities from.fuzzy pair wise comparison judgments [J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2003,134(3):365-385.
    [47]马晓燕.带概率判断和模糊区间判断的一种排序算法[J].模糊系统与数学,2002,16(3):69-73.
    [48]吴江.群决策中4种偏好信息的转换方法研究[J].武汉理工大学学报·信息与管理工程版,2004.26(3):64-67.
    [49]周宏安,刘三阳.区间数互补判断矩阵排序的一种新方法[J].西安电子科技大学学报(自然科学板),2006,33(2):292-295.
    [50]徐泽水.区间数互补判断矩阵排序的一种实用方法[J].运筹与管理,2001,10(1):16-19.
    [51]徐泽水.给予可能度和误差分析的区间数互补判断矩阵排序法[J].解放军理工大学学报(自然科学板),2003,4(2):96-98.
    [52]徐泽水,张学仁.区间数混合判断矩阵及其排序方法[J].模糊系统与数学,2006,22(2):93-96.
    [53]Z S Xu,J Chen.Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations[J].European Journal of Operational Research,doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.011.
    [54]徐泽水,顾红芳.混合判断矩阵的两种排序方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2002,24(5):1-3.
    [55]肖四汉,樊治平,王梦光.群决策中两类偏好信息—AHP判断矩阵和模糊偏好关系矩阵的一致化方法[J].系统工程学报,2002,17(1):82-86.
    [56]Orlovski S A.Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1978,1:155-167.
    [57]TaninoT.Fuzzy preference Orderings in Group Decision Making[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1984,12:117-131.
    [58]Kacprzyk.J.Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1986,12:105-118.
    [59]Chiclana F,Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma.Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1998(97):33-48.
    [60]樊治平,姜艳萍,肖四汉.基于OWA算子的不同形式偏好信息的群决策方法[J].控制与决策,2001,19(5):12-18.
    [61]徐泽水.多属性决策中四类偏好信息的一种集成途径[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,22(1):117-120.
    [62]程乾生.属性层次模型AHM—一种新的无结构决策方法[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1998,34(1):10-14.
    [63]杜栋,基于0.1-0.9标度的AHP再研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2001,23(5):36-38.
    [64]Leung L C,Cao D.On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP [J].European Journal of Operational Research,2000,124(1):102-113.
    [65]Byeong S.The analytic hierarchy process in an uncertain environment:A simulation approach by Hauser and Tadikamalla(1996)[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2000,124(1):217-218.
    [66]Xuzhu Wang,Etienne E.Kerre.Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities(Ⅰ)、(Ⅱ)[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2001,118:375-405.
    [67]Bryson N,Joseph A.Generating consensus priority interval vectors for group decision-making in the AHP[J].Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,2000,9(4):127-137.
    [68]Sugihara Kazutomi,Hideo Tanaka.Interval Evaluation in the Analytic Hierarchy Process by Possibility Analysis[J].Computational Intelligence,2001,17(3):567-579.
    [69]魏毅强,刘进生,王绪柱.不确定型AHP中判断矩阵的一致性概念及权重[J].系统工程与理论实践,1994,7(4):16-22.
    [70]周礼刚,陈华友.两类区间数判断矩阵的一致性研究[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(4):47-51.
    [71]姚敏.一种实用的模糊层次分析法[J].软科学,1990,(1):46-49.
    [72]姚敏,张森.模糊一致矩阵及其在软科学中的应用[J].系统工程,1997,15(2):54-57.
    [73]姚敏,张森.模糊一致矩阵及其在决策分析中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998,18(5):78-81.
    [74]姚敏,黄燕君.模糊决策方法研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1999,19(11):61-64.
    [75]樊治平,李洪燕,胡国奋.一类Fuzzy判断矩阵及方案排序的目标规划法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2000,21(1):60-62.
    [76]朱建军,刘士新,王梦光.一种新的求解区间数判断矩阵权重的方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,(4):29-34.
    [77]徐泽水.三角模糊数互补判断矩阵排序方法研究[J].系统工程学报,2004,19(1):85-88.
    [78]周珍,吴祈宗,刘福祥.三角模糊数互补判断矩阵的一种排序方法及其在项 目投资决策中的应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2005,35(11):74-77.
    [79]周王玮,张玉芝.模糊AHP的权重向量求解方法研究[J].控制与决策 2006,21(2):184-188.
    [80]樊治平,姜艳萍.基于OWG算子的不同形式偏好信息的群决策方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(1):32-36.
    [81]徐泽水.一种基于互反判断矩阵的多属性决策信息集成方法[J].系统工程,2002,20(2):93-96.
    [82]Congxin Wu,Deli Zhang.Fuzzy integrals of functions with respect to fuzzy measure[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1998,98:355-360.
    [83]Zhiping Qiu,Isaac Elishakoff.Antioptimization structures with large uncertain-but-nonrandom parameters via interval analysis[J].Computer method in applied mechanics and engineering,1998,152:361-372.
    [84]韦兰用,韦振中.区间数判断矩阵中区间数的运算[J].数学的实践与认识,2003,33(9):75-79.
    [85]Van Laarhoven PJM,PedryczW.A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory [J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1983,11:229-241.
    [86]P.T.Harker and G.L.Vargas.The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation:Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process.Management Science,1987,33,1383-1403.
    [87]舒康,梁镇韩.AHP中的指数标度法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1990,10(1):6-8.
    [88]汪浩,马达.层次分析标度评价与新标度方法[J].系统工程,1993,13(5):24-26.
    [89]左军.层次分析法中判断矩阵的间接给出法[J].系统工程,1988,9(6):55-63.
    [90]姚敏,张森.模糊性的度量及其运用[J].系统工程与电子技术,1998,20(1):41-46.
    [91]杜栋.论AHP的标度评价[J].运筹与管理,2000,9(2):42-45.
    [92]T.L.Saaty.The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M].NewYork:McGraw-Hill,1980
    [93]陆明生.多目标决策中的权系数[J].系统工程理论与实践,1986,6(4) 77-78.
    [94]镇常青.多目标决策的权重调查确定方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1987,7(4)23-26.
    [95]王鹏,宋保维,曹廷旭.基于互补判断矩阵权最小平方法的层次分析法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(5):608-609.
    [96]陶菊春,吴建春.综合加权评分法的综合权重确定新探[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001,8:43-48.
    [97]徐泽水.多属性决策的组合赋权方法研究权重[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(2):84-87.
    [98]孙在东,徐泽水,达庆利.基于方案贴近度的不确定型多属性决策模型[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(1):58-62.
    [99]D.V.Budescu.Scaling binary comparison matrices:A Narasim han's proposed and other methods[J].Fuzzy sets and systems,1984.14:187-192.
    [100]王莲芬.梯度特征向量排序法的推导与改进[J].系统工程理论与实践,1989,(3)17-21.
    [101]L.Mikhailov.A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process[J].Journal of Operational Research Society,2000.51,341-349.
    [102]Beynon,Malcolm.DS/AHP method:A mathematical analysis,including an.understanding of uncertainty[J].European Journal of Operational Research Volume:140,Issue:1,July 1,2002,148-164.
    [103]徐泽水.模糊互补判断矩阵的排序方法研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2002,24(11):73-75.
    [104]徐泽水.模糊互补判断矩阵排序的一种算法[J].系统工程学报,2001,8(4):311-314.
    [105]徐泽水.模糊互补判断矩阵排序的最小方差法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001,21(10):93-96.
    [106]樊治平,胡国奋.模糊判断矩阵的一致性逼近及排序方法[J].运筹与管理,2000,9(3):21-25.
    [107]兰继斌,徐扬,霍良安.模糊层次分析法研究[J].系统工程与理论实践,2006,(9):107-112.
    [108]徐泽水.三角模糊数互补判断矩阵排序的一种方法[J].系统工程学报,2002,16(1):47-50.
    [109]姜艳萍,樊治平.三角模糊数互补判断矩阵排序的一种实用方法[J].系统工程,2002,20(2):89-92.
    [110]樊治平,姜艳萍.一种三角模糊数互补判断矩阵的排序方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2002,24(7):34-36.
    [111]肖钰、李华.基于三角模糊数的判断矩阵的改进及其应用[J].模糊系统与数学,2003,17(2):56-64.
    [112]Wan Yucheng,Ma Baoguo,Shag Zhaohan.Ranking method for the reciprocal judgment matrix based on the unascertained three-valued judgments [J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Eletronics,2006,17(1):115-120.
    [113]林军,苏英.一类模糊属性值的多属性决策问题的排序方法[J].四川师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,29(4):450-454.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700