产业集群共享性资源动态演化机制研究
|
摘要
近二十年来，产业集群以其在推动区域经济增长方面的重要作用，日益受到国内外学者的广泛关注。然而，大量有关产业集群的研究工作，极少有致力于运用新近的基于资源观及其理论，以对产业集群成长的内在机理进行深入剖析和阐述的相关研究。
本文运用企业的基于资源观及其理论、产业集群理论和组织学习理论的相关研究成果，通过理论演绎、案例研究、实证研究等方法，力求在以下具有内在关联性的三个方面的问题上有所突破：
第一，产业集群共享性资源，作为企业的基于资源观及其理论在产业集群层面上拓展研究的重要成果之一，其来源和构成如何明确，概念如何界定，并且具有什么样的特点?
第二，产业集群共享性资源的内涵十分丰富，如何提出既有理论意义、又符合现实情况的维度划分方法，在此基础上，如何对产业集群共享性资源动态演化概念进行界定，并且如何通过合理的理论演绎，明晰其动态演化的过程和机制?
第三，产业集群共享性资源动态演化的动力是什么，影响因素又是什么，动态演化的过程如何实现，动态演化模型如何表达，如何建构用于实证的结构方程模型，而其动态演化机制，在集群企业异质性和产业集群成长等方面的促进上，又发挥着什么样的作用?
围绕以上三个方面的问题，本文在企业的基于资源观及其理论的文献述评基础上，从企业作为资源综合体的本质分析入手，通过影响企业竞争优势的资源三分法，探讨企业的外部资源获得、消化吸收与内部化、最终转化为企业共享性知识的这一跨越企业边界的资源演化过程。然后，在产业集群文献述评的基础上，探讨集群企业的外部资源获得、消化吸收与内部化、最终转化为产业集群共享性资源的这一跨越企业边界和产业集群边界的资源演化过程。通过对某一产业集群背景下的若干案例的探索性研究，得出产业集群共享性资源的来源和划分维度；通过产业集群及其共享性资源交互演化的历程分析，得出本文所述的产业集群共享性资源的概念，以及产业集群共享性资源动态演化的机制。同时，运用案例研究的结果，论证了集群企业具有的相对同质基础上的相对异质性这一符合基于资源观及其理论的假设前提，为后续开展的产业集群共享性资源动态演化模型的得出和结构方程模型的实证等各项研究工作，奠定相应的理论基础。
随后，本文按照基于资源观及其理论中的“资源选择”理论和“能力构建”理论的有关研究成果，明晰了产业集群共享性资源的构成要素。同时，在繁杂的组织学习和集体学习的文献综述基础上，提出并剖析了产业集群集体学习的概念，对相应的测度方法进行了探讨。以此为基础，按照基于资源观及其理论所依据的有关资源动态演化与环境变化相匹配的观点，完善了前述案例的探索性研究所提出的产业集群共享性资源动态演化模型，借以明晰产业集群共享性资源动态演化的作用路径及其运行机制。最后，通过结构方程模型法的检验，修正并确立最终模型，完成实证过程，得出具有一些启发性的结论，并据此模型以及理论演绎结论，对现行的以提升产业集群竞争力为目标的各项理论研究和实践探索进行新的审视与思考。本文研究的不足及未来值得进一步深入研究的方向，得到清晰而明确的阐述。
按照本文提出需要突破的问题和全文逻辑思想的安排，全文分七个章节展开论述。其中，第1章至第3章是文献述评和全文主要概念的界定部分，为全文的基础；第4章至第5章为探索性研究部分，在理论演绎、案例研究和实证研究的基础上，提出产业集群共享性资源动态演化机制及其初步的理论模型；第6章为验证性研究部分，运用结构方程模型法，来证实和支持本文前述的模型，并对实证结果进行分析和讨论；第7章为总结部分，对本文的研究成果进行评价，指出不足，提出未来研究的方向。具体的章节安排如下：
第1章，绪论。本章交待了文章的研究背景、研究目的和意义、研究方法和技术路线、全文结构及内容安排，为本文研究的展开奠定基础。
第2章，企业的基于资源观及其理论述评。本章围绕企业的基于资源观及其理论展开述评，提炼出运用基于资源观进行理论研究的原则和方法，为企业的基于资源观及其理论在产业集群层面的拓展研究奠定基础。同时，对组织学习和组织经济学展开文献综述。
第3章，产业集群共享性资源及其动态演化的机制。本章展开对产业集群的本质意义挖掘，对产业集群的相关文献展开述评。以此为基础，对产业集群共享性资源展开文献述评，指出相关研究中的不足和缺陷，进而明晰产业集群共享性资源的概念、来源和划分维度，并对其动态演化的概念与机制进行了理论演绎和界定。同时，对集体学习展开文献综述。
第4章，产业集群共享性资源动态演化的案例研究。本章通过对某一产业集群背景下的四个案例的探索性研究，印证了第3章提出的产业集群共享性资源概念、来源、构成要素和划分维度的合理性，提出了产业集群共享性资源动态演化的分析框架和理论表征方法。进而通过实证研究，得出集群企业具有在相对同质基础上的相对异质性这一符合基于资源观及其理论的假设前提，完成对产业集群共享性资源动态演化过程的逻辑框架的探索，为其模型的得出和相关实证工作的展开奠定基础。
第5章，产业集群共享性资源动态演化模型。本章建构起“产业集群共享性资源—产业集群集体学习—集群企业技术创新”的产业集群共享性资源动态演化模型，围绕各构成要素之间的作用路径和作用机制，展开进一步的讨论。
第6章，产业集群共享性资源动态演化模型的实证研究。本章采用结构方程模型法，对前述通过案例研究和理论演绎得到的模型，进行估计、检验、修正与调整，确立最终模型。以此为基础，对模型中的作用路径和实证结果进行分析和讨论，指出本研究结果对于产业集群发展的理论研究和实践探索所具有的指导意义和若干启示。
第7章，结论与展望。本章对全文进行总结，指出本文研究的理论创新、实践意义和存在的不足，点明未来有待继续深入研究的方向。
基于上述研究工作，本文得出如下主要结论：
(1)产业集群共享性资源的动态演化，具有“产业集群共享性资源—产业集群集体学习—集群企业技术创新”的内在机制，反映了基于资源观及其理论所要求的资源与环境相匹配的观点。产业集群共享性资源中的集体声誉要素，对集群企业的相对吸收能力发生直接显著的正向影响；当地机构的参与要素，除了直接显著地正向影响集群企业技术创新外，同时对组织学习、资源的交换与组合发生直接显著的正向影响；补充性资源的异质性要素，仅对集群企业技术创新发生显著直接的正向影响；紧密的竞合互动氛围要素，对集群企业的组织学习和相对吸收能力发生显著直接的正向影响。
(2)产业集群集体学习在产业集群共享性资源动态演化过程中发挥着重要的中介作用，推动产业集群共享性资源具备有价值、稀缺、难以模仿和难以替代的特性，并且具有李嘉图租金的获取潜力。产业集群集体学习中的组织学习要素，是产业集群共享性资源动态演化过程能够实现的基础；集群企业的相对吸收能力要素，反映了产业集群共享性资源动态演化的方向；资源的交换与组合要素，则是产业集群共享性资源动态演化能够实现的关键。
(3)产业集群共享性资源和产业集群集体学习的构成要素之间的作用路径和路径载荷具有差异性，反映了产业集群中复杂多样的内外部网络关系，促进了集群企业异质性的形成，因而成为产业集群共享性资源进一步动态演化的基础。产业集群共享性资源动态演化机制，符合基于资源观及其理论的一般要求。
同时，本文在以下三个方面取得一定的理论创新成果：
(1)提出了具有理论和实践意义的产业集群共享性资源的概念和来源。
其他学者提出的不为集群企业所有或独占、也不排除被其共享、而产业集群外的企业(或非集群企业)不能够获得的产业集群共享性资源概念，依据于集群企业相对同质性的假设前提，隐含着产业集群具有促使集群企业相对于集群外企业的竞争优势的预设条件，忽视了产业集群共享性资源的来源分析，割裂了产业集群共享性资源与集群企业资源之间的互生互动关系，并且在产业集群共享性资源具有的李嘉图租金获取潜力的论证上，缺乏基于资源观及其理论的有效支撑。
本文提出的产业集群共享性资源的概念是，来自于集群成员及其影响其竞争优势的各类资源的共同贡献，被集群成员不均衡共享，基于集群成员之间、集群成员与影响其竞争优势的产业集群内外部社会网络的成员及其各类资源的互动基础上的产业集群资源。首先，集群成员及其影响其竞争优势的各类资源是产业集群共享性资源的来源，因而将产业集群共享性资源与集群成员资源进行了联结。其次，集群成员对产业集群共享性资源的共享程度，受到交易成本、社会网络等因素的影响，因而表现为不均衡的状态。再次，本文提出的概念，隐含着集群企业具有相对异质性的理论假设前提和产业集群共享性资源的动态演化状态。
(2)提出了具有理论和实践意义的划分产业集群共享性资源的两个维度，并以共享性资源在两个维度上的变化，来清晰地勾勒出产业集群共享性资源的动态演化过程，并对其概念进行了界定和明晰。
集群成员及其影响其竞争优势的各类资源，能够成为产业集群共享性资源的来源，以及产业集群共享性资源所能够发生的动态演化，具有理论意义的诠释工具和划分维度，是资源的根植性维度和异质性维度。根植性维度，反映了产业集群共享性资源嵌入产业集群内部社会网络的稳定状态。异质性维度，反映了产业集群共享性资源嵌入产业集群内部社会网络的可能程度。因此，产业集群共享性资源动态演化，是其在根植性和异质性两个维度上的演变历程。
(3)提出了产业集群共享性资源的动态演化机制，包括作用路径、影响因素及其与产业集群成长的关系。
产业集群共享性资源动态演化，可以概括为产业集群共享性资源，通过产业集群集体学习的中介作用，在其根植性和异质性两个维度上的动态演变过程。实证结果表明，集群企业的技术创新，能够合理地表征集群企业的价值产生以及集群企业的异质性特征，因而可以作为产业集群共享性资源动态演化完成状态的表征指标。产业集群共享性资源的动态演化，反映了产业集群的存在状态和成长方式。其理论研究成果，是基于资源观在产业集群成长理论研究中的拓展应用，因而在针对产业集群现象的众多研究领域，具有较好的诠释力。
本文同时提出了未来值得进一步深入研究的方向：
(1)在本文有关产业集群共享性资源动态演化机制及其模型的研究成果基础上，选择国内外不同类型的产业集群案例，通过结构方程模型的方法来进行验证，可以得到不同产业集群在产业集群共享性资源、产业集群集体学习与集群企业技术创新各构成要素之间的不同作用路径和关系，从而在揭示不同产业集群的内在特点和成长轨迹等方面，相信能够得出更为丰富和完善的结论。
(2)在此基础上，进而开展对国内外产业集群的比较研究，相信所得结论，能够为我国产业集群发展的战略研究和政策设计等方面，提供更多更好的指导。
For almost two decades, industrial clusters have received more and more attentions from scholars both at home and abroad, because of their increasingly significant effects on regionally economical growth. In spite of the great number of researches on them, little has been devoted to extend recent firm strategy theories to the application of industrial clusters, in order to deeply parse their internal development mechanism.
In virtue of theory analysis, case study, and demonstration research as well, this paper manages to resolve three interrelated questions as follows, depending on the outcomes of researches on resource-based view and its theories of firms.
1. How to define the concept of shared resources of industrial clusters, as one of the most important outcomes of studies of resource-based view and its theories on industrial clusters, and how to discover their sources and contents?
2. As for abundant content of shared resources of industrial clusters, how to theoretically propose the dimensions to divide them, and based on which, how to define the concept of dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources?
3. How can the dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources be realized? What are the factors to influence the dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources? And how do they influence the growth of industrial clusters?
Based on these three questions described above, depending on literature review on resource-based view and its theories, the paper starts with analyzing the firms as resources complex and investigating the evolving process of firm's resources from acquisition, assimilation, internalization to transformation to shared knowledge inside firm, which spans firms' boundaries. And then, the evolving process of clustered firms' resources from acquisition, assimilation, internalization to transformation to industrial clusters' shared resources, which spans the boundaries of both industrial clusters and their clustered firms, has been explored. In virtue of case study on individual industrial cluster in Zhejiang, the sources of industrial clusters' shared resources, and the dividing dimensions employed to describe their factors' common characteristics, will be abstracted. Meanwhile, with the analyses on the mutual processes of dynamic evolution of both industrial clusters and their shared resources, the concept of industrial clusters' shared resources, the theoretical method to describe their dynamic evolution, and the related theory model have been achieved. Demonstration research also helps discover clustered firms' nature of relative heterogeneity based on relative homogeneity, which consists with resource-based view and its theories and therefore becomes the precondition of research on industrial clusters' shared resources.
And then, the theoretical construction of industrial clusters' shared resources has been abstracted in virtue of both 'resource picking' theory and 'capability building' theory. Based on literature review on organizational learning and collective learning, the concept of industrial clusters' collective learning is put forward and deeply parsed, the method for measuring collective learning is also discussed. After all these studies have been done, the dynamic evolution model of industrial clusters' shared resources further modified is confirmed, which describes the paths and relationships among factors of industrial clusters' shared resources, factors of industrial clusters' collective learning, and technological innovation of clustered firms as well. In the end of the paper, SEM is applied, the model is tested, several policy implications are achieved, and further research issues are put forward, which help rethink the theoretical research and empirical exploration on the competitiveness of industrial clusters.
In order to accomplish the research work, the paper will divide all contexts into seven chapters. Literature review and definitions of main concepts are proposed from chapter 1 to chapter 3, which become the bases of the paper. The model of dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources will be put forward in chapter 4 and 5, based on theory analysis, case study, and demonstration research as well. SEM is applied in chapter 6 to testify the model above. In chapter 7, some conclusions and discussion will be achieved. The structure of this paper will be given as follows.
Chapter 1 establishes the foundation of the whole work through describing the background, objective value, research methods, structure and innovativeness of this study.
Chapter 2 comments on the resource-based view and its theories, and settles a theoretical ground for the following work. Literature review on organizational learning is applied.
Chapter 3 comments on the researches on industrial clusters and shared resources. Literature review on collective learning is accomplished.
Chapter 4 discusses the concept, sources, dividing dimensions, and dynamic evolving process of industrial clusters' shared resources in terms of case study. And then the exploration on the logic of dynamic evolution of industrial cluster is accomplished also in this chapter by statistics analysis.
Chapter 5 constructs a conceptual model, which represents the relationship among shared resources, collective learning and technological innovation of clustered firms. Related relationships among them are deeply discussed.
Chapter 6 applies SEM to estimate, verify, modify, and modulate repeatedly the conceptual model, and then analyze and discuss the conclusions drawn from the above research. Some suggests aim at the practice of enhancing shared resources to improve the technological innovation and competitiveness of industrial clusters are put forward.
Chapter 7 takes a brief summary of the whole research, which indicates the limitations of the study and provides some ideas for further researches.
Based on prior research, some conclusions can be achieved as follows.
1. The dynamic evolving process of shared resources possesses such mechanism as 'shared resources - collective learning - technological innovation of clustered firms', which consists with the viewpoint of resource-based view and its theories about matching between resources and environment. The factor of shared resources, collective reputation, plays positive direct influence on relative absorptive capability of clustered firms. The factor, participation of the local institutions, plays positive direct influence on organizational learning, exchange and combination of resources, and technological innovation of clustered firms as well. The factor, differentiations of complementary resources, plays positive direct influence only on technological innovation of clustered firms. The factor, interactive atmosphere of both competition and cooperation among clustered firms, plays positive direct influence on both organizational learning and relative absorptive capability.
2. Collective learning plays important intermediary functions on dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources. The factor, organizational learning, is the decisive power for dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources. The factor, relative absorptive capability of clustered firms, reflects the direction of dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources. And the factor, exchange and combination of resources, becomes the key element for realization of dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources.
3. Both internal and external innovation networks of industrial clusters can be expressed by diversity of paths and their loaded coefficients among factors of both shared resources and collective learning of industrial clusters. The heterogeneity among clustered firms can be therefore formed, which becomes the forces to propel dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources, and consists with the general precondition for the application of resource-based view on industrial clusters.
Based on the construction and analyses of dynamic evolution model of industrial clusters' shared resources, theoretical innovations of the paper will be as follows.
1. The theoretical concept of industrial clusters' shared resources and their sources have been proposed. Several scholars argue that, shared resources refer to those intangible resources and capabilities shared by industrial district firms, which are neither exclusive to nor the property of the individual firm and not made available to outside firms. However, the concept in this paper refers to those resources, which are collective contribution of clustered members and their resources influencing their competitive advantage, shared unevenly by all the clustered members, and supported by both the interaction among clustered members and the interaction between clustered members and those resources influencing their competitive advantage.
2. The dimensions, which helps understand the dynamic evolving process of industrial clusters' shared resources, can be drawn. That is, the dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources can be expressed as the transformation of both embeddedness and heterogeneity of shared resources. Embeddedness reflects the state of shared resources in the internal network of industrial cluster. Heterogeneity reflects the possibility of shared resources embedded in the internal network of industrial cluster.
3. The dynamic evolving process of shared resources can be recapitulated as the dynamic evolution of both embeddenness and heterogeneity of industrial clusters' shared resources, regulated by industrial clusters' collective learning. Technological innovation of clustered firms can be used to express value creation of clustered firms, the heterogeneity of clustered firms, and the accomplishment of dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources as well.
Of course, some further research issues have also been proposed as follows.
1. More cases studies of industrial clusters both at home and abroad can be implemented for deeply understanding of relationships among factors of industrial clusters' shared resources and collective learning.
2. Comparative researches among various industrial clusters both at home and abroad can help us comprehend the differences, which will provide better instructions about the strategic design for further development of industrial clusters.
本文运用企业的基于资源观及其理论、产业集群理论和组织学习理论的相关研究成果，通过理论演绎、案例研究、实证研究等方法，力求在以下具有内在关联性的三个方面的问题上有所突破：
第一，产业集群共享性资源，作为企业的基于资源观及其理论在产业集群层面上拓展研究的重要成果之一，其来源和构成如何明确，概念如何界定，并且具有什么样的特点?
第二，产业集群共享性资源的内涵十分丰富，如何提出既有理论意义、又符合现实情况的维度划分方法，在此基础上，如何对产业集群共享性资源动态演化概念进行界定，并且如何通过合理的理论演绎，明晰其动态演化的过程和机制?
第三，产业集群共享性资源动态演化的动力是什么，影响因素又是什么，动态演化的过程如何实现，动态演化模型如何表达，如何建构用于实证的结构方程模型，而其动态演化机制，在集群企业异质性和产业集群成长等方面的促进上，又发挥着什么样的作用?
围绕以上三个方面的问题，本文在企业的基于资源观及其理论的文献述评基础上，从企业作为资源综合体的本质分析入手，通过影响企业竞争优势的资源三分法，探讨企业的外部资源获得、消化吸收与内部化、最终转化为企业共享性知识的这一跨越企业边界的资源演化过程。然后，在产业集群文献述评的基础上，探讨集群企业的外部资源获得、消化吸收与内部化、最终转化为产业集群共享性资源的这一跨越企业边界和产业集群边界的资源演化过程。通过对某一产业集群背景下的若干案例的探索性研究，得出产业集群共享性资源的来源和划分维度；通过产业集群及其共享性资源交互演化的历程分析，得出本文所述的产业集群共享性资源的概念，以及产业集群共享性资源动态演化的机制。同时，运用案例研究的结果，论证了集群企业具有的相对同质基础上的相对异质性这一符合基于资源观及其理论的假设前提，为后续开展的产业集群共享性资源动态演化模型的得出和结构方程模型的实证等各项研究工作，奠定相应的理论基础。
随后，本文按照基于资源观及其理论中的“资源选择”理论和“能力构建”理论的有关研究成果，明晰了产业集群共享性资源的构成要素。同时，在繁杂的组织学习和集体学习的文献综述基础上，提出并剖析了产业集群集体学习的概念，对相应的测度方法进行了探讨。以此为基础，按照基于资源观及其理论所依据的有关资源动态演化与环境变化相匹配的观点，完善了前述案例的探索性研究所提出的产业集群共享性资源动态演化模型，借以明晰产业集群共享性资源动态演化的作用路径及其运行机制。最后，通过结构方程模型法的检验，修正并确立最终模型，完成实证过程，得出具有一些启发性的结论，并据此模型以及理论演绎结论，对现行的以提升产业集群竞争力为目标的各项理论研究和实践探索进行新的审视与思考。本文研究的不足及未来值得进一步深入研究的方向，得到清晰而明确的阐述。
按照本文提出需要突破的问题和全文逻辑思想的安排，全文分七个章节展开论述。其中，第1章至第3章是文献述评和全文主要概念的界定部分，为全文的基础；第4章至第5章为探索性研究部分，在理论演绎、案例研究和实证研究的基础上，提出产业集群共享性资源动态演化机制及其初步的理论模型；第6章为验证性研究部分，运用结构方程模型法，来证实和支持本文前述的模型，并对实证结果进行分析和讨论；第7章为总结部分，对本文的研究成果进行评价，指出不足，提出未来研究的方向。具体的章节安排如下：
第1章，绪论。本章交待了文章的研究背景、研究目的和意义、研究方法和技术路线、全文结构及内容安排，为本文研究的展开奠定基础。
第2章，企业的基于资源观及其理论述评。本章围绕企业的基于资源观及其理论展开述评，提炼出运用基于资源观进行理论研究的原则和方法，为企业的基于资源观及其理论在产业集群层面的拓展研究奠定基础。同时，对组织学习和组织经济学展开文献综述。
第3章，产业集群共享性资源及其动态演化的机制。本章展开对产业集群的本质意义挖掘，对产业集群的相关文献展开述评。以此为基础，对产业集群共享性资源展开文献述评，指出相关研究中的不足和缺陷，进而明晰产业集群共享性资源的概念、来源和划分维度，并对其动态演化的概念与机制进行了理论演绎和界定。同时，对集体学习展开文献综述。
第4章，产业集群共享性资源动态演化的案例研究。本章通过对某一产业集群背景下的四个案例的探索性研究，印证了第3章提出的产业集群共享性资源概念、来源、构成要素和划分维度的合理性，提出了产业集群共享性资源动态演化的分析框架和理论表征方法。进而通过实证研究，得出集群企业具有在相对同质基础上的相对异质性这一符合基于资源观及其理论的假设前提，完成对产业集群共享性资源动态演化过程的逻辑框架的探索，为其模型的得出和相关实证工作的展开奠定基础。
第5章，产业集群共享性资源动态演化模型。本章建构起“产业集群共享性资源—产业集群集体学习—集群企业技术创新”的产业集群共享性资源动态演化模型，围绕各构成要素之间的作用路径和作用机制，展开进一步的讨论。
第6章，产业集群共享性资源动态演化模型的实证研究。本章采用结构方程模型法，对前述通过案例研究和理论演绎得到的模型，进行估计、检验、修正与调整，确立最终模型。以此为基础，对模型中的作用路径和实证结果进行分析和讨论，指出本研究结果对于产业集群发展的理论研究和实践探索所具有的指导意义和若干启示。
第7章，结论与展望。本章对全文进行总结，指出本文研究的理论创新、实践意义和存在的不足，点明未来有待继续深入研究的方向。
基于上述研究工作，本文得出如下主要结论：
(1)产业集群共享性资源的动态演化，具有“产业集群共享性资源—产业集群集体学习—集群企业技术创新”的内在机制，反映了基于资源观及其理论所要求的资源与环境相匹配的观点。产业集群共享性资源中的集体声誉要素，对集群企业的相对吸收能力发生直接显著的正向影响；当地机构的参与要素，除了直接显著地正向影响集群企业技术创新外，同时对组织学习、资源的交换与组合发生直接显著的正向影响；补充性资源的异质性要素，仅对集群企业技术创新发生显著直接的正向影响；紧密的竞合互动氛围要素，对集群企业的组织学习和相对吸收能力发生显著直接的正向影响。
(2)产业集群集体学习在产业集群共享性资源动态演化过程中发挥着重要的中介作用，推动产业集群共享性资源具备有价值、稀缺、难以模仿和难以替代的特性，并且具有李嘉图租金的获取潜力。产业集群集体学习中的组织学习要素，是产业集群共享性资源动态演化过程能够实现的基础；集群企业的相对吸收能力要素，反映了产业集群共享性资源动态演化的方向；资源的交换与组合要素，则是产业集群共享性资源动态演化能够实现的关键。
(3)产业集群共享性资源和产业集群集体学习的构成要素之间的作用路径和路径载荷具有差异性，反映了产业集群中复杂多样的内外部网络关系，促进了集群企业异质性的形成，因而成为产业集群共享性资源进一步动态演化的基础。产业集群共享性资源动态演化机制，符合基于资源观及其理论的一般要求。
同时，本文在以下三个方面取得一定的理论创新成果：
(1)提出了具有理论和实践意义的产业集群共享性资源的概念和来源。
其他学者提出的不为集群企业所有或独占、也不排除被其共享、而产业集群外的企业(或非集群企业)不能够获得的产业集群共享性资源概念，依据于集群企业相对同质性的假设前提，隐含着产业集群具有促使集群企业相对于集群外企业的竞争优势的预设条件，忽视了产业集群共享性资源的来源分析，割裂了产业集群共享性资源与集群企业资源之间的互生互动关系，并且在产业集群共享性资源具有的李嘉图租金获取潜力的论证上，缺乏基于资源观及其理论的有效支撑。
本文提出的产业集群共享性资源的概念是，来自于集群成员及其影响其竞争优势的各类资源的共同贡献，被集群成员不均衡共享，基于集群成员之间、集群成员与影响其竞争优势的产业集群内外部社会网络的成员及其各类资源的互动基础上的产业集群资源。首先，集群成员及其影响其竞争优势的各类资源是产业集群共享性资源的来源，因而将产业集群共享性资源与集群成员资源进行了联结。其次，集群成员对产业集群共享性资源的共享程度，受到交易成本、社会网络等因素的影响，因而表现为不均衡的状态。再次，本文提出的概念，隐含着集群企业具有相对异质性的理论假设前提和产业集群共享性资源的动态演化状态。
(2)提出了具有理论和实践意义的划分产业集群共享性资源的两个维度，并以共享性资源在两个维度上的变化，来清晰地勾勒出产业集群共享性资源的动态演化过程，并对其概念进行了界定和明晰。
集群成员及其影响其竞争优势的各类资源，能够成为产业集群共享性资源的来源，以及产业集群共享性资源所能够发生的动态演化，具有理论意义的诠释工具和划分维度，是资源的根植性维度和异质性维度。根植性维度，反映了产业集群共享性资源嵌入产业集群内部社会网络的稳定状态。异质性维度，反映了产业集群共享性资源嵌入产业集群内部社会网络的可能程度。因此，产业集群共享性资源动态演化，是其在根植性和异质性两个维度上的演变历程。
(3)提出了产业集群共享性资源的动态演化机制，包括作用路径、影响因素及其与产业集群成长的关系。
产业集群共享性资源动态演化，可以概括为产业集群共享性资源，通过产业集群集体学习的中介作用，在其根植性和异质性两个维度上的动态演变过程。实证结果表明，集群企业的技术创新，能够合理地表征集群企业的价值产生以及集群企业的异质性特征，因而可以作为产业集群共享性资源动态演化完成状态的表征指标。产业集群共享性资源的动态演化，反映了产业集群的存在状态和成长方式。其理论研究成果，是基于资源观在产业集群成长理论研究中的拓展应用，因而在针对产业集群现象的众多研究领域，具有较好的诠释力。
本文同时提出了未来值得进一步深入研究的方向：
(1)在本文有关产业集群共享性资源动态演化机制及其模型的研究成果基础上，选择国内外不同类型的产业集群案例，通过结构方程模型的方法来进行验证，可以得到不同产业集群在产业集群共享性资源、产业集群集体学习与集群企业技术创新各构成要素之间的不同作用路径和关系，从而在揭示不同产业集群的内在特点和成长轨迹等方面，相信能够得出更为丰富和完善的结论。
(2)在此基础上，进而开展对国内外产业集群的比较研究，相信所得结论，能够为我国产业集群发展的战略研究和政策设计等方面，提供更多更好的指导。
For almost two decades, industrial clusters have received more and more attentions from scholars both at home and abroad, because of their increasingly significant effects on regionally economical growth. In spite of the great number of researches on them, little has been devoted to extend recent firm strategy theories to the application of industrial clusters, in order to deeply parse their internal development mechanism.
In virtue of theory analysis, case study, and demonstration research as well, this paper manages to resolve three interrelated questions as follows, depending on the outcomes of researches on resource-based view and its theories of firms.
1. How to define the concept of shared resources of industrial clusters, as one of the most important outcomes of studies of resource-based view and its theories on industrial clusters, and how to discover their sources and contents?
2. As for abundant content of shared resources of industrial clusters, how to theoretically propose the dimensions to divide them, and based on which, how to define the concept of dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources?
3. How can the dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources be realized? What are the factors to influence the dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources? And how do they influence the growth of industrial clusters?
Based on these three questions described above, depending on literature review on resource-based view and its theories, the paper starts with analyzing the firms as resources complex and investigating the evolving process of firm's resources from acquisition, assimilation, internalization to transformation to shared knowledge inside firm, which spans firms' boundaries. And then, the evolving process of clustered firms' resources from acquisition, assimilation, internalization to transformation to industrial clusters' shared resources, which spans the boundaries of both industrial clusters and their clustered firms, has been explored. In virtue of case study on individual industrial cluster in Zhejiang, the sources of industrial clusters' shared resources, and the dividing dimensions employed to describe their factors' common characteristics, will be abstracted. Meanwhile, with the analyses on the mutual processes of dynamic evolution of both industrial clusters and their shared resources, the concept of industrial clusters' shared resources, the theoretical method to describe their dynamic evolution, and the related theory model have been achieved. Demonstration research also helps discover clustered firms' nature of relative heterogeneity based on relative homogeneity, which consists with resource-based view and its theories and therefore becomes the precondition of research on industrial clusters' shared resources.
And then, the theoretical construction of industrial clusters' shared resources has been abstracted in virtue of both 'resource picking' theory and 'capability building' theory. Based on literature review on organizational learning and collective learning, the concept of industrial clusters' collective learning is put forward and deeply parsed, the method for measuring collective learning is also discussed. After all these studies have been done, the dynamic evolution model of industrial clusters' shared resources further modified is confirmed, which describes the paths and relationships among factors of industrial clusters' shared resources, factors of industrial clusters' collective learning, and technological innovation of clustered firms as well. In the end of the paper, SEM is applied, the model is tested, several policy implications are achieved, and further research issues are put forward, which help rethink the theoretical research and empirical exploration on the competitiveness of industrial clusters.
In order to accomplish the research work, the paper will divide all contexts into seven chapters. Literature review and definitions of main concepts are proposed from chapter 1 to chapter 3, which become the bases of the paper. The model of dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources will be put forward in chapter 4 and 5, based on theory analysis, case study, and demonstration research as well. SEM is applied in chapter 6 to testify the model above. In chapter 7, some conclusions and discussion will be achieved. The structure of this paper will be given as follows.
Chapter 1 establishes the foundation of the whole work through describing the background, objective value, research methods, structure and innovativeness of this study.
Chapter 2 comments on the resource-based view and its theories, and settles a theoretical ground for the following work. Literature review on organizational learning is applied.
Chapter 3 comments on the researches on industrial clusters and shared resources. Literature review on collective learning is accomplished.
Chapter 4 discusses the concept, sources, dividing dimensions, and dynamic evolving process of industrial clusters' shared resources in terms of case study. And then the exploration on the logic of dynamic evolution of industrial cluster is accomplished also in this chapter by statistics analysis.
Chapter 5 constructs a conceptual model, which represents the relationship among shared resources, collective learning and technological innovation of clustered firms. Related relationships among them are deeply discussed.
Chapter 6 applies SEM to estimate, verify, modify, and modulate repeatedly the conceptual model, and then analyze and discuss the conclusions drawn from the above research. Some suggests aim at the practice of enhancing shared resources to improve the technological innovation and competitiveness of industrial clusters are put forward.
Chapter 7 takes a brief summary of the whole research, which indicates the limitations of the study and provides some ideas for further researches.
Based on prior research, some conclusions can be achieved as follows.
1. The dynamic evolving process of shared resources possesses such mechanism as 'shared resources - collective learning - technological innovation of clustered firms', which consists with the viewpoint of resource-based view and its theories about matching between resources and environment. The factor of shared resources, collective reputation, plays positive direct influence on relative absorptive capability of clustered firms. The factor, participation of the local institutions, plays positive direct influence on organizational learning, exchange and combination of resources, and technological innovation of clustered firms as well. The factor, differentiations of complementary resources, plays positive direct influence only on technological innovation of clustered firms. The factor, interactive atmosphere of both competition and cooperation among clustered firms, plays positive direct influence on both organizational learning and relative absorptive capability.
2. Collective learning plays important intermediary functions on dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources. The factor, organizational learning, is the decisive power for dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources. The factor, relative absorptive capability of clustered firms, reflects the direction of dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources. And the factor, exchange and combination of resources, becomes the key element for realization of dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources.
3. Both internal and external innovation networks of industrial clusters can be expressed by diversity of paths and their loaded coefficients among factors of both shared resources and collective learning of industrial clusters. The heterogeneity among clustered firms can be therefore formed, which becomes the forces to propel dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources, and consists with the general precondition for the application of resource-based view on industrial clusters.
Based on the construction and analyses of dynamic evolution model of industrial clusters' shared resources, theoretical innovations of the paper will be as follows.
1. The theoretical concept of industrial clusters' shared resources and their sources have been proposed. Several scholars argue that, shared resources refer to those intangible resources and capabilities shared by industrial district firms, which are neither exclusive to nor the property of the individual firm and not made available to outside firms. However, the concept in this paper refers to those resources, which are collective contribution of clustered members and their resources influencing their competitive advantage, shared unevenly by all the clustered members, and supported by both the interaction among clustered members and the interaction between clustered members and those resources influencing their competitive advantage.
2. The dimensions, which helps understand the dynamic evolving process of industrial clusters' shared resources, can be drawn. That is, the dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources can be expressed as the transformation of both embeddedness and heterogeneity of shared resources. Embeddedness reflects the state of shared resources in the internal network of industrial cluster. Heterogeneity reflects the possibility of shared resources embedded in the internal network of industrial cluster.
3. The dynamic evolving process of shared resources can be recapitulated as the dynamic evolution of both embeddenness and heterogeneity of industrial clusters' shared resources, regulated by industrial clusters' collective learning. Technological innovation of clustered firms can be used to express value creation of clustered firms, the heterogeneity of clustered firms, and the accomplishment of dynamic evolution of industrial clusters' shared resources as well.
Of course, some further research issues have also been proposed as follows.
1. More cases studies of industrial clusters both at home and abroad can be implemented for deeply understanding of relationships among factors of industrial clusters' shared resources and collective learning.
2. Comparative researches among various industrial clusters both at home and abroad can help us comprehend the differences, which will provide better instructions about the strategic design for further development of industrial clusters.
引文
[1] Adams, M. E., Day, G. S. & Dougherty, D. Enhancing new product development performance: an organizational learning perspective [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Manage, 1998(15): 403-422
[2] Ahrne, G. Social organizations. Interaction inside, outside and between organizations [M]. London: Sage Publishings, 1994
[3] Almeida, P & Kogut, B. The exploration of technological diversity and geographic localization in innovation: start-up firms in the semi-conductor industry [J]. Small Business Economics, 1997, 9(1): 21-31
[4] Altenburg, T. & Meyer-Stamer, J. How to promote clusters: policy experiences from Latin American [J]. World Development, 1999(27): 1693-1713
[5] Alvarez, S. & Busenitz, L. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory [J]. Journal of Management, 2001 (6): 755-775
[6] Amin, A. The globalization of the economy. An erosion of regional networks [A]? Grabher, G. The embedded firm. On the socioeconomics of industrial networks [C]. London: Routledge, 1993:278-295
[7] Amit, R. & Schoemaker, E Strategic assets and organizational rent [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993(15): 5-9
[8] Anderson, E. & Coughlan, A. Y. International market entry and expansion via independent or integrated channels of distribution [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1987(51): 71-82
[9] Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. & Holm, U. The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002(23): 979-996
[10] Andrews, K. R. The concept of corporate strategy [M]. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1971
[11] Ansoff, H. I. Corprorate strategy [M]. New York: McGraw Hill, 1965
[12] Argyres, N. Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(2): 129-150
[13] Argyris, C. & Schon, D. Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective [J]. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978
[14] Asheim, P. Industrial districts as 'learning regions' [J]. European Planning Studies, 1996(4): 379-400
[15] Audretsch, D. B. & Feldman, M. P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production [J]. American Economic Review, 1996, 86 (3): 630-652
[16] Aydalot, P. Milieux innovateurs en Europe [M]. GREMI, Paris, 1986
[17] Aydalot, P. & Keeble, D. High technology industry and innovative environments in Europe [A]. Aydalot, P. & Keeble, D. High technology industry and innovative environments: the European perspective [C]. London: Routledge, 1988:1-21
[18] Balconi, M., Breschi, S. & Lissoni, F. Networks of inventors and the location of academic research: an exploration of Italian patent data [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(1): 127-145
[19]Baptista, R. Clusters, innovation and growth: A survey of the literature [A]. Swann, P., Prevenzer, M. & Stout, D. The Dynamics of Industrial Clusters: International Comparisons in Computing and Biotechnology [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998: 13-51
[20]Baptista, R. & Swann, P. Do firms in clusters innovate more [J]? Research Policy, 1998, 27(5): 525-540
[21]Barkema, H. G, Bell J. H. J. & Pennings, J. M. Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(2): 151-166
[22]Barnett, W. P., Greve, H. R. & Park, D. Y. An evolutionary model of organizational performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994(15): 11-28
[23]Barney, J. B. Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy [J]. Management Science, 1986(32): 1231-1241
[24]Barney, J. B. Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis [J]. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 1988(9): 71-78
[25]Barney, J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1): 99-120
[26]Barney, J. B. Looking inside for competitive advantage [J]. Academy of Management Executive, 1995, 9(4): 48-61
[27]Barney, J. B. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage [M]. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1997
[28]Barney, J. B. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten year retrospective on the resource-based view [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(27): 643-650
[29]Barney, J. B. & Ouchi, W. G Organizational Economics: Toward a New Paradigm for Understanding and Studying Organizations [M]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1986
[30] Barney, J., Wright, W. & Ketchen, D. J. Jr. The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991 [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(27): 625-641
[31]Becanttini, G. Sectors and/or districts: some remarks on the conceptual foundations of industrial economics [A]. Goodman, E., Bamford, J. & Saynor, P. Small firms and industrial districts in Italy [C]. London: Routledge, 1989: 123-135
[32]Becattini, G. The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion [A]. Pyke, F., Becattini, G & Sengenberger, W. Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration [C]. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990:37-51
[33]Becattini, G distretto industriale marshalliano come concetto socio-economico [A]. Pyke, F., Becattino, G. & Sengenberger, W. Distretti industrialize cooperazione tra imprese in Italia [C]. di Studi e Informazione della Banca Toscana, 1991:34-35
[34]Bell, G. G Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005(26): 287-295
[35]Benner, M. & Tushman, M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003(28): 238-256
[36]Bergh, D. D. Size and relatedness of units sold: An agency theory and resource-based perspective [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995,16(3): 221-240
[37]Berson, Y., Nemanich, L. A., Waldman, D. A., et al. Leadership and organizational learning: a multiple levels perspective [J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2006(17): 577-594
[38]Beyer, J. M. Ideologies, values and decision making in organization [A]. Nystrom, P. C. & Starbuck, W. H. Handbook of organization design [C]. NY: Oxford University Press, 1981(2): 166-202
[39]Bianchi, P. & Bellini, N. Public policies for local networks of innovators [J]. Research Policy, 1991,20: 487-497
[40]Blankenburg, D. & Johanson, J. Managing network connections in international business [J]. Scandinavian International Business Review, 1992(1): 5-19
[41]Blaug, M. Economic theory in retrospect [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985
[42]Bortagaray, I. & Tiffin, S. Innovation clusters in Latin America [A]. In Fourth International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, Curitiba, Brazil, 2000:28-31
[43]Borys, B. & Jemison, D. B. Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14:234-249
[44]Boschma, R.A. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment [J]. Regional Studies, 2005(39): 61-74
[45]Bourdieu, P. La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement [M]. Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1979
[46]Bower, G H. & Hilgard, E. R. Theories of learning [M]. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981
[47]Braczyk, H., Cooke, P. & Heidenreich, M. Regional Innovation Systems [M]. London: UCL Press, 1998
[48]Bradach, J. L. Using the plural form in management of restaurant chains [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997(42): 276-303
[49]Breschi, S. & Lissoni, F. Localized knowledge spillovers versus innovative milieux: knowledge 'tacitness' reconsidered [J]. Regional Science, 2001a(80): 255-273
[50]Breschi, S. & Lissoni, F. Knowledge spillovers and local innovation system: a critical survey [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2001b(10): 975-1005
[51]Brusco, S. The idea of the industrial district: its genesis. In Industrial Districts and Inter- firm Co-operation in Italy [A]. Pyke, F., Becattini, G. & Sengenbeger, W. International Institute for Labour Studies: Geneva, 1990: 10-19
[52]Brusco, S. Rules of the game in industrial districts [A]. Grandori, A. Interfirm networks: Organization and industrial Competitiveness [C]. London, UK: Routledg, 1999: 17-40
[53]Buck, N., Crookston, M., Gordon, I. et al. A socio-economic assessment of London: A report by Llewelyn Davies and Partners [M]. London: Association for London Government, 1997
[54]Burgalman, R. A. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983(28): 223-224
[55]Burt, R. S. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1987, 92(May): 1287-1335
[56]Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T. & Zhao, Y. S. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2002(31): 515-524
[57]Camagni, R. Innovation networks: spatial perspectives [M]. London: Bellhaven Press, 1991
[58]Caniels, M. C. J. & Romijn H. A. What drives innovativeness in industrial clusters? Transcending the debate [A]. Presented at the Regional Studies Association International Conference, Pisa, Italy, 2003
[59]Cantner, U. & Graf, H. Cooperation and specialization in German technology regions [J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2004,14(5): 543-562
[60]Capello, R. Spatial and sectorial characteristics of relational capital in innovation activity [J]. European Planning Studies, 2002(10): 177-200
[61]Carrie, A. S. From extended enterprises to regional clusters - the changing basis of competition [A]. Coopers. Manufacturing leadership: Through the extended enterprise [C]. London UK: Technology Publishing Ltd, 2000: 127-130
[62] Carrol, G & Teo, A. Creative destruction among organizations: an empirical study of technical innovation and organizational failure in the American automobile industry, 1885-1981 [J]. Industry & Corporation Change, 1996, 5(2): 619-644
[63]Castanias, R. & Helfat, C. Managerial resources and rents [J]. Journal of Management, 1991(17): 155-171
[64]Chakravarthy, B. S. Measuring strategic performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1986(7): 437-458
[65] Chandler, A. D. Strategy and structure. Cambridge [M]. MA: MIT Press, 1962
[66]Chatterjee, S. & Wernerfelt, B. The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12(1): 33-48
[67]Chesbrough, H. W. The Era of Open Innovation [J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003, Spring
[68] Chi, T. Trading in strategic resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(4): 271-290
[69] Cho, H. D. & Lee, J. K. The development path of networking capability of catch-up players in Korea's semiconductor industry [J]. R&D Management, 2003, 4:411-423
[70] Christensen, P. Forsstrom, B. Lindmark, L. et al. Firms in network, spatial impacts and policy implications [A]. Illeris, S. & Jacobsen, L. Networks and regional development [C]. Kopenhamn: Akademisk Forlag, 1990: 11-58
[71] Cohen, W. M & Levinthal, D. A. Innovation and learning: two faces of R&D [J]. Economic Journal, 1989(99): 569-596
[72] Cohen, W. M & Levinthal, D. A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990(35): 128-152
[73]Cohendet, P., Llerena, P. & Marengo, L. Theory of the firm in an evolutionary perspective: A critical assessment [A]. Presented at the 2nd Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, Paris, 1998
[74] Combs, J. G & Ketchen, Jr., D. J. Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economies [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(9): 867-888
[75] Conner, K. R. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization theory: Do we have a new theory of the firm [J]. Journal of Management, 1991(17): 121-155
[76] Conner, K. R & Prahalad, C. K. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism [J]. Organization Science, 1996(7): 477-501
[77] Cook, K. S. & Emerson, R. M. Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks [J]. American Sociological Review, 1978(43): 721-739
[78]Cooke, P. M., Uranga, G. & Etxebarria, G Regional innovation systems: institutional and organizational dimensions [J]. Research Policy, 1997(26): 475-491
[79]Cooke, P. M. Knowledge economies. Clusters, learning and cooperative advantage [M]. London: Routledge, 2002
[80]Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. & Braczyk, H.-J. Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, 2nd ed [M]. Routledge, London, New York, 2004
[81]Cooke, P. M. & Memedovic, O. Strategies for Regional Innovation Systems: Learning Transfer and Applications. Policy Papers, UNIDO, Vienna, 2003
[82]Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999(24): 522-537
[83]Cyert, R.M. & March, J.G A behavioral theory of the firm [M]. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963
[84]Czamanski, S. & Ablas, L. A. Identification of industrial clusters and complexes: a comparison of methods and findings [J]. Urban Studies, 1979,16(1): 61-80
[85] Daft, R. L. & Weick, K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984(9): 284-295
[86]Damanpour, F. Organizational innovation: a metaanalysis of effects of determinants and moderators [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(3): 555-590
[87] Darby, M. R. & Zucker, L. G. Growing by leaps and inches: Creative destruction, real cost reduction, and inching up [J]. Economic Inquiry, 2003(41): 1-18
[88]David, H. & Wersching, K. On technological specialization in industrial clusters: an agent-based analysis [EB/01]. http:// www. wiwi. uni-bielefeld. de/ -dawid/ papers/ WP- Specialization.pdf, 2005
[89]Day, G. S. The capabilities of market-driven organizations [J]. Journal of Market, 1994(58): 37-52
[90]Debresson, C. & Amesse, F. Networks of innovators: a review and an introduction to the issue [J]. Research Policy, 1991, 20(5): 363-380
[91]Dicken, P. Global shift: the internationalization of economic activity (2nd ed) [M]. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 1992
[92]Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage [J]. Management Science, 1989(35): 1504-1514
[93]Dore, R. Taking Japan seriously [M]. Palo Alto, CA: Standford University Press, 1987.
[94]Dosi, G Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1988, 26(September): 1120-1171
[95]Dosi, G, Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000
[96]Duncan, R. B. Modifications in decision structures in adapting to the environment: some implications for organizational learning [J]. Decision Science, 1974: 705-725
[97]Dutton, J. & Duncan, R. Sense-making and organizational adaptation. Working Paper, Northwestern University, J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, 1982(March)
[98] Dyer, J. H. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(4): 271-292
[99]Easton, G & Lundgren, A. Changes in industrial networks as flow through nodes [A]. Axelsson, B. & Easton, G Industrial networks - A new view of reality [C]. London: Routledge, 1992: 24, 88-104
[100] Edquist, C. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations [M]. London: Pinter Publishers, 1997
[101]Eisenhardt, K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989(14): 57-74
[102] Ellis, H. C. The transfer of learning [M]. New York: Macmillan, 1965
[103] Enright, M. J. Regional clusters and firm strategy [A]. Chandler, A. D. et al. The dynamic firm: the role of technology, strategy, organization, and regions [C]. Oxford: 1999:315-342
[104] Erramilli, M. K. & Rao, C. P. Choice of foreign market entry modes by service firms: Role of market knowledge [J]. Management International Review, 1990, 30(2): 135-150
[105]Estes, W. K. Learning theory and mental development [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1970
[106] Evans, P. A. L. Dosing the glue: applying human resource technology to build the global organization [A]. Shaw, B. & Kirkbride, P. Research in personnel and human resources management: Volume 3 [C]. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1993: 21-54
[ 107] Feldman, M. P. The geography of innovation [M]. London, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994
[108] Ferguson, T. D., Deephouse, D. L. & Ferguson, W. L. Do strategic groups differ in reputation [J]? Strategic Management Journal, 2000(21): 1195-1214
[109] Feser, E. J. & Bergman, E. M. National industry cluster templates: a framework for applied regional cluster analysis [J]. Regional Studies, 2000, 34(1): 1-19
[110] Feser, E. J. Old and new theories of industry clusters [A]. Steiner, E. M. Clusters and regional specialisation on geography technology and networks [C], 1998: 18-39
[111]Fiol, C. M. Management culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991(17): 191-211
[112] Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. A. Organizational learning [J]. Academy of Management, 1985,10(4): 803-813
[113] Fisher, M.M. The innovation process and network activity of manufacturing firms [A]. Fisher, M.M., Suarez-Vilia, L. & Steiner, M. Innovation, networks and localities [C]. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1999: 11-27
[114] Florida, R. Regional creative destruction: production organization, globalization and the economic transformation of the Midwest [J]. Economic Geography, 1996, 72(3): 314-334
[115] Foss, K. & Foss, N. J. Learning in firms: knowledge-based and property rights perspectives [J]. European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 2000, 14(2): 119-141
[116] Foss, N. J. Higher-order industrial capabilities and competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Industry Studies, 1996(3): 1-20
[117] Foster, G Financial statement analysis [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pentice-Hall, 1986
[118] Freeman, C. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan [M]. London: Frances Pinter, 1987
[119] Freeman, C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues [J]. Research Policy, 1991(20): 499-514
[120] Freeman, C. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan [M]. London: Frances Pinter, 1992
[121]Fritsch, M. R&D co-operation and the efficiency of regional innovation activities [J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2004, 28 (6): 829-846
[122] Gadde, L.-E. & Mattsson, L.-G. Stability and change in network relationships [J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1987(4): 29-41
[123]Geroski, P. Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability [A]. Stoneman, P. Handbook of the Economies of Innovation and Technological Change [C]. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, 1995: 90-131
[124] Gibson, C. B. & Birkinshaw, J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004(47): 209-226
[125]Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A. et al. Growth in cities [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 100(6): 1126-1152
[126]Glynn, M. A. Innovation genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligence to innovation [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(4): 1081-1111
[127] Gordon, L. R. & McCann, R Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks [J]? Urban Studies, 2000, 37(3): 513-532
[128] Grabher, G Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations [A]. Grabher, G The embeddedness firm. On the socioeconomics of industrial networks [C]. London: Routledge, 1993: 1-32
[129] Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973(78): 1360-1380
[130] Granovetter, M. S. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1985(91): 481-510
[131] Granovetter, M. S. The social construction of economic institutions [A]. Etzoni, A. & Lawrence, R. Socio-economics: towards a new synthesis [C]. New York: Armonk, 1991:75-81
[132] Granovetter, M. S. Problems of explanation in economic sociology [A]. Nohria, N. & Eccles, R. Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action [C]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1992: 25-56
[133] Grant, R. The resource based theory of competitive advantage, implications for strategy formulation [J]. California Management Review, 1991 (Spring): 114-135
[134] Grant, R. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996(17): 109-122
[135] Gray, B. & Wood, D. J. Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory [J]. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1991, 27(1): 3-22
[136]Gregersen, B. & Johnson, B. Learning economics, innovation systems and Europesn integration [J]. Regional Studies, 1997, 31(5): 479-490
[137]GuIyani, S. Effects of poor transportation on lean production and industrial clustering: evidence from the Indian Auto Industry [J]. World Development, 2001,29(7): 1157-1177
[138] Hair, J. F, Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R.L. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. [M]. Prentice Hall College Div, 1998
[139] Hakansson, H. Industrial technological development. A network approach [M]. London: Croom Helm, 1987
[140] Hakansson, H. Corporate technological behavior: cooperation and networks [M]. London: Routledge, 1989
[141] Hakansson, H. & Johanson, J. A model of industrial networks [J]. Working Paper, Department of Business Administration, University of Uppsala, 1985
[142] Hakansson, H. & Senhota, I. Developing relationships in business networks [M]. London: Routledge, 1995
[143]Halinen, A. & Tornroos, J.-A. The role of embeddedness in the evolution of business networks [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1998, 14(3): 187-205
[144] Hall, R. The strategic analysis of intangible resources [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992(13): 135-144
[145]Hambrick, D. C. Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1983(26): 5-26
[146]Hamel, G. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 1991(12): 83-103
[147]Hamel, G & Prahalad, C. K. Competing for the Future [M]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994
[148] Harrison, B. Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles [J]? Regional Studies, 1991(26): 469-483
[149] Harrison, B. Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1994
[150] Harrison, B., Kelley, M. R. & Gant, J. Innovative firm behavior and local milieu: exploring the intersection of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change [J]. Economic Geography, 1996, 72(3): 233-258
[151] Harrison, J. S. & Freeman, R. E. Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical evidence [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(5): 479-485
[152]Hedberg, B. How organization learn and unlearn [A]? Nystrom, P. C. & Starbuck, W. H. Handbook of organizational design [C]. London: Oxford University Press, 1981: 8-27
[153] Henderson, R. & Clark, K. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms [J]. Administration Science Quarterly, 1990(35): 9-30
[154] Henderson, R. & Cockburn, I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994(15): 63-84
[155]Hendry, C. Understanding and creating whole organizational change through learning theory [J]. Hum Relat, 1996, 49(5): 621-641
[156]Hesterly, W. S., Liebeskind, J. & Zenger, T. R. Organizational economics: An impending revolution in organization theory [J]? Academy of Management Review, 1990(15): 402-420
[157] Hill, C. W. L., Hitt, M. A. & Hoskisson, R. E. Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms [J]. Organization Science, 1992(3): 501-521
[158] Hitt, M. A & Irenland, R. D. Relationships among corporate-level distinctive competencies, diversification strategy, corporate structure and performance [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1986(23): 401-416
[159] Hitt, M. A. & Irenland, R. D. Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1985(6): 273-293
[160] Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E. & Kim, H. International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firm [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1997(40): 767-798
[161]Hofer, C. W. ROVA: A new measure for assessing organizational performance [A]. Lmab, R. B. Advances in strategies management [C]. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983(2): 43-55
[162] Hoover, E. M. Location theory and the shoe and leather industries [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937
[163] Hoover, E. M. The location of economic activity [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948
[164]Hrebiniak, L. G & Joyce, W. F. Implementing strategy [M]. New York: Macmillan, 1984
[165]Huber, G P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature [J]. Organization Science, 1991(2): 88-115
[166] Ingham, H. & Thompson, S. Wholly-owned versus collaborative ventures for diversifying financial services [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(4): 325-334
[167]Isard, W. & Kuenne, R. E. The impact of steel upon the Greater New York-Philadelphia industrial region [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1953(35): 289-301
[168] Isard, W. & Vietorisz, T. Industrial complex analysis and regional development with particular reference to Puerto Rico [J]. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 1955(1): 229-247
[169]Itami, H & Roehl, T. W. Mobilizing invisible assets [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987
[170] Jacobs, D. & De Man, A. P.. Clusters, industrial policy and firm strategy: A menu approach [J]. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1996(8): 425-437
[171]Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3): 577-598
[172] Javidan, M. Core competence: What does it mean in practice [J]? Long Range Planning, 1998, 31(1): 60-71
[173] Jerez-Gomez, P., Cespedes, J. & Valle-Cabrera, R. Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2005(58): 715-725
[174] Johanson, J. & Mattsson, L.-G International marketing and internationalization process - a network approach [A]. Turnbull, P. W. & Paliwoda, S. J. Research in international marketing [C]. London: Croom Helm, 1986: 234-265
[175] Johanson, J. & Mattsson, L.-G Network positions and strategic action - an analytic framework [A]. Axelsson, B. & Easton, G Industrial networks - a new view of reality [C]. London: Routledge, 1992: 205-217
[176] Kaldor, N. Interregional trade and cumulative causation [A]. Economics without equilibrium [C]. New York: Sharpe, 1985: 57-79
[177] Kaplan, R. S. Yesterday's accounting undermines production [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1984(62): 95-101
[178]Karim, S. & Mitchell, W. Path-dependent and path-breaking change: reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978-1995 [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10): 1061-1081
[179]Keeble, D., Lawson, C, Moore, B. et al. Collective learning processes, networking and institutional thickness in the Cambridge region [J]. Regional Studies, 1999, 33(4): 319-331
[180]Ketels, C. The development of the cluster concept - present experiences and further developments [A]. Paper prepared for the NRW Conference on Clusters, Duisburg, Germany, 5 Dec 2003
[181] King, D. R., Covin, J. G & Hegarty, W. H. Complementary resources and the exploitation of technological innovation [J]. Journal of Management, 2003, 29(4): 589-606
[182]Knott, A. M. Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003(24): 687-705
[183] Krugman, P. Geography and trade [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991
[184]Krugman, P. Increasing returns and economic geography [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1991(99): 483-499
[185]Laat, M. F. de. Collectief leren in organisaties met behulp van ICT [J]. Opleiding en Ontwikkeling, 2001,14(3): 21-24
[186] Lane, P. J. & Lubatkin, M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998(19): 461-477
[187] Lawrence, P. R. & Dyer, D. Renewing American industry [M]. New York: Free Press, 1983.
[188] Lawson, C. & Lorenz, E. Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity [J]. Regional Studies, 1999, 33 (4): 305-317
[189] Lawson, C. Towards a competence theory of the region [J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1999(23): 151-166
[190]Lazaric, N. & Lorenz, E. Trust and organizational learning during inter-firm cooperation [A]. Lazaric, N. & Lorenz, E. The economics of trust and learning [C]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997
[191]Lazerson, M. Subcontracting in the Modena knitwear district [A]. Pyke, F., Becattini, G, & Sengenberger, W. Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy [C]. Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990
[192] Lazerson, M. & Lorenzoni, G The firms that feed industrial districts: a return to the Italian source [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1999, 8(2): 235-266
[193] Learned, E. P., Christensen, C. R. & Andrews, K. R. et al. Business policy [M]. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1969
[194]Lechner, C. & Dowling, M. Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms [J]. Enterpreneurship & Regional Development, 2003(15): 1-26
[195] Leonard, D. & Swap, W. Gurus in the garage [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2000, 78(6): 71-78
[196] Leonard-Barton, D. Core Capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development [J]. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 1992(13): 111-125
[ 197] Levinthal, D. & Myatt, J. Co-evolution of capabilities and industry: the evolution of mutual fund processing [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994(15): 45-62
[198] Levitt, B. & March, J. Organizational learning [A]. Cohen, M. D. & Sproull, L. S. Organizational learning [C]. CA: Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1996: 516-541
[199] Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P. & Carroll, T. The co-evolution of new organizational forms [J]. Organization Science, 1999(10): 535-550
[200] Lippman, S. & Rumelt, R. Uncertain limitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition [J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1982(13): 418-438
[201]Lockett, A. & Thompson, S. The resource-based view and economics [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(6): 723-754
[202] Lundvall, B. User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalization [A]. Lundvall, B. National systems of innovation: towards atheory of innovation and interactive learning [C]. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992: 45-67
[203] Lundvall, B. National systems of innovation: toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning [M]. London: Frances Pinter, 1992
[204]Mabey, C. & Salaman, G. Strategic human resource management [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995
[205] Mahoney, J. & Pandian, R. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992(13): 363-380
[206] Mahoney, J. T. & Pandian, J. R. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992,13(5): 363-380
[207] Maillat, D. The innovation process and the role of the Milieu [A]. Bergman, E., Mailer, G & Todtling, F. Regions reconsidered: economic networks, innovation and local development in industrialized countries [C]. London: Routledge, 1991: 103-117
[208] Maillat, D. Territorial dynamic, innovative milieus and regional policy [J]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1995(7): 157-165
[209] Makadok, R. Interfirm differences in scale economies and the evolution of market shares [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(10): 935-952
[210]Malecki, E. Soft variables in regional science [J]. Review of Regional Studies, 2000(30): 61-69
[211] Malerba, F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production [J]. Research Policy, 2002,31 (2): 247-264
[212]Malmberg, A. & Maskell, P. The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering [J]. Environment and Planning, 2002(34): 429-449
[213] March, J. G Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning [J]. Organization Science, 1991(2): 71-87
[214] March, J. G. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen [M]. Free Press: New York, 1994
[215]Marengo, L. Coordination and organization learning in the firm [J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economy, 1992(2): 313-326
[216] Markides, C. C. & Williamson, P. J. Corporate diversification and organization structure: A resource-based view [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39: 340-367
[217] Marshall, A. Principles of economics, 8th ed. [M]. London: Macmillan, 1925
[218] Martin, J. Stories and scripts in organizational settings [A]. Hastorf, A. & Isen, A. Cognitive social psychology [C]. New York: Elsevier-North Holland, 1982: 225-305
[219] Martin, R. E & Sunley, P. Paul Krugman's geographical economics and its implications for regional development theory: A critical assessment [J]. Economic Geography, 1996,72(3): 259-292
[220] Martin, R. E. & Justis, R. T. Franchising, liquidity constraints and entry [J]. Applied Economics, 1993,25: 1269-1277
[221] Mattsson, L.-G An application of a network approach to marketing - defining and changing market positions [A]. Dholakia, N. & Arndt, J. Changing the course of marketing. Alternative paradigms for widening marketing theory [C]. Greenwish: JAI Press, CT, 1985: 263-288
[222] Mattsson, L.-G Indirect relations in industrial networks - a conceptual analysis of their strategic significance [A]. Presented at the 3rd IMP Conference, Lyon, 1986
[223] McCann, P. Rethinking the economics of location and agglomeration [J]. Urban Studies, 1995(32): 563-577
[224] McCann, P. The economics of industrial location: a logistics-costs approach [M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 1998
[225] McEvily, B. & Zaheer, A. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999(20): 1133-1156
[226] McGrath, R. G Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001(44): 118-131
[227]McKee, D. An organizational learning approach to product innovation [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1992(9): 234
[228]Melin, L. The field-of-force metaphor [A]. Covusgil, T. S. Advances in international marketing [C]. Greenwish: JAI Press, CT, 1989, 3: 161-179
[229] Meyer-Stamer, J. Path dependence in regional development: persistence and change in three industrial clusters in Santa Catarina, Brazil [J]. World Development, 1998, 26(8): 1495 - 1511
[230] Meyer-Stamer, J. Regional and locational policy what can we learn from the ceramics and textiles/ clothing clusters of Santa Catarina, Brazil [A]. In Building a modern and effective business development services industry in Latin America and the Caribbean. Duisberg [C]. Germany/Joinville Brazil: Institute for Development and Peace/Fundac_(?)ao Empreender, 1999
[231] Miller, D. & Shamsie, J. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: the Hollywood film studio from 1936 to 1965 [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(3): 519-543
[232] Molina-Morales, F. X. European industrial districts: influence of geographic concentration on performance of the firm [J]. Journal of International Management, 2001(7): 277-294
[233] Molina-Morales, F. X. Industrial districts and innovation: the case of the Spanish ceramic tiles industry [J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2002(14): 317-335
[234] Molina-Morales, F. X. & Mart'inez-Fernandez, M. T. The impact of industrial district affiliation on firm value creation [J]. European Planning Studies, 2003(11): 156-169
[235] Molina-Morales, F. X. & Mart'inez-Fernandez, M. T. How much difference is there between industrial district firms? A net value creation approach [J]. Research Policy, 2004(33): 473-486
[236] Monteverde, K. & Teece, D. J. Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry [J]. RAND, Journal of Economics, 1982(13): 206-213
[237] Montgomery, C, A. & Wemerfelt, B. Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q [J]. Rand Journal, 1988: 623-632
[238] Montgomery, C. A. & Hariharan, S. Diversified expansion by large established firms [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior, 1991: 71-89
[239] Morgan, K. The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal [J]. Research Policy, 1997, 31(5): 491-503
[240] Morosini, P. Managing cultural differences [M]. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1998
[241] Morosini, P. Competing on social capabilities: a defining strategic challenge of the new millennium [C]. IMD Working Paper 2002-1, IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002
[242] Morosini, P. Industrial clusters, knowledge integration and performance [J]. World Development, 2004, 32(2): 305-326
[243] Nagarajan, A. & Mitchell, W. Evolutionary diffusion: internal and external methods used to acquire encompassing, complementary, and incrementary technological changes in the Lithotripsy industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998(19): 1063-1077
[244] Nelson, R. R & Winter, S. G An evolutionary theory of economic change [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university Press, 1982
[245] Nelson, R. R. Why of firms differ and how does it matter [J]? Strategic Management Journal, 1991(12): 61-74
[246] Nelson, R. R. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993
[247] Nicholls-Nixon, C. Absorptive capacity and technological sourcing: implications for the responsiveness of established firms [D]. Ph. D. Dissertation, Purdue University, 1993
[248] Nohria, N. & Gulati, R. Is slack good or bad for innovation [J]? Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39(5): 1245-1264
[249]Nonaka, I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation [J]. Organization Science, 1994(5): 14-37
[250] North, D. C. Structure and Change in Economic History [M]. New York: W. W. Norton& Company, 1981
[251] Oerlemans, L., Meeus, M. & Boekema, F. Innovation and proximity: theoretical perspectives [A]. Green, M. & McNoughton, R. Industrial networks and proximity [C]. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000: 17-46
[252] Oerlemans, L., Meeus, M. & Boekema, F. On the spatial embeddedness of innovation networks: an exploration of the proximity effect [J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2001, 92(1): 60-75
[253] Ormrod, R. K. Local context and innovation diffusion in a well-connected world [J]. Economic Geography, 1990, 66(2): 109-122
[254] Paniccia, I. One, a hundred, thousands industrial districts. Organizational variety of local networks of small and medium-sized enterprises [J]. Organization Studies, 1998(4): 667-699
[255] Patrucco, P. P. Institutional variety, networking, and knowledge exchange: Communication and innovation in the case of the Brianza technological district [J]. Regional Science, 2003(37): 159-172
[256] Pegels, C. C, Song, Y. I. & Yang, B. Management heterogeneity, competitive interaction groups, and firm performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000(21): 911-923
[257] Peng, M. The resource-based view and international business [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(6): 803-829
[258] Pennings, J. M. & Harianto, F. The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992a, 13(1): 29-46
[259] Pennings, J. M. & Harianto, F. Technological networking and innovation implementation [J]. Organization Science, 1992b(3): 356-382
[260] Penrose, E. T. The theory of the growth of the firm [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1959
[261] Peteraf, M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993(14): 179-191
[262] Pettigrew, M.A. Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice [J]. Organization Science, 1990(1): 267-292
[263] Piore M. & Sabel, C. The second industrial divide: possibilities for properity [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1984
[264] Pitelis, C. Market and non-market hierarchies: Theory of institutional failure [M]. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993
[265] Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S. & Paine, J. et al. Organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research [J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(3): 513-563
[266] Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension [M]. New York: anchor Day, 1966
[267] Porter, M. E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations [M]. London: Macmillan, 1990
[268] Porter, M. E. Clusters and the new economics of competition [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1998, 76(6): 77-90
[269] Pouder, R & St. John, C. H. Hot spots and blind spots: geographical clusters of firms and innovation [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(4): 1192-1225
[270] Powell, W. W. Getting Into Print: The Decision-Making Process in Scholarly Publishing [M]. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, 1985
[271] Powell, W. W & Smith-Doerr, L. Networks and economic life [A]. Smelser, N. J & Swedberg, R. The Handbook of Economic Sociology [C]. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1994: 368-402
[272] Prahalad, C. K & Bettis, R. The dominant logic: Anew linkage between diversity and performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1986(7): 485-501
[273] Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G The core competence of the corporation [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990, May-June: 79-91
[274] Pratt, A. The emerging shape and form of innovation networks and institutions [A]. Simmie, J. Innovation, networks and learning region [C]? London: Jessica Kingsley, 1997
[275]Pyke, F, Becattini, G & Sengenberger, W. Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy [M]. Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990
[276] Rabellotti, R., Is there an "industrial district model"? Footwear districts in Italy and Mexico compared [J]. World Development, 1993(23): 29-41
[277] Rabellotti, R. Is there an industrial district flow? Footwear districts in Italy and Mexico compared [J]. World Development, 1995, 23(1): 29 - 41
[278] Rabellotti, R. Recovery of a Mexican cluster: devaluation bonanza or collective efficiency [J]. World Development, 1999,27(9): 1571 - 1585
[279] Rabellotti, R. & Schmitz, H. The internal heterogeneity of industrial districts in Italy, Brazil and Mexico [J]. Regional Studies, 1999(33): 97-108.
[280]Radner, R. The internal economy of large firms [J]. Economic Journal (Supplement), 1986(96): 1-22
[281]Ricardo, D. The principle of political economy and taxation [M]. Reprinted, London: J. M. Dent & Son, 1965, Original 1817
[282] Richardson, G. The organization of industry [J]. Economy Journal, 1972(82): 883-896
[283] Robert, P. W. & Dowling, G R. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002(23): 1077-1093
[284] Robins, J. & Wiersema, M. F. A resourcebased approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16(4): 277-300
[285] Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations (4th edn) [M]. Free Press: New York, 1995
[286]Rond'e, P. & Hussler, C. Innovation in regions: what does really matter [J]? Research Policy, 2005(34): 1150-1172
[287] Rosenberg, D. Cloning Silicon Valley: the next generation high-tech hotspots [M]. London, UK: Reuters/ Pearson Education, 2002
[288] Rosenfeld, S. A. Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development [J]. European Planning Studies, 1997(5): 3-23
[289] Rothaermel, F. T. Research note in cumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001(22): 687-699
[290] Rouse M. J. & Fouts, P. A. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997,40(3): 534-559
[291]Rumelt, R. P. Towards a strategic theory of the firm [A]. Larnb, R. B. Competitive Strategic Management [C]. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984:556-570
[292]Rumelt, R. P. Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship [A]. Teece, D. The competitive chanllenge. Cambridge [C]. MA: Ballinger, 1987: 137-158
[293] Sabel, C. Flexible specialization and the re-emergence of regional economies [A]. Hirst, P. & Zettlin, J. Reversing industrial decline? Industrial structure and policy in Britain and her competitors [C]. Oxford: Berg: 1989
[294] Salomon, I. & Schofer, J. Transportation and telecommunications costs: some implications for small countries [A]. Dietz, F., Heijman, W. & Shefer, D. Location and labour considerations for regional development [C]. Aldershot: Avebury, 1990:49-63
[295] Saxenian, A. L. Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994
[296] Saxenian, A. L., & Hsu, J. Y. The Silicon Valley - Hsinchu connection: technical communities and Industrial upgrading [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2001, 10(4): 893-920
[297] Scandura, T. Dysfunctional mentoring relationships and outcomes [J]. Journal of Management, 1998, 24(3): 449-467
[298] Schmitz, H. & Nadvi, K. Industrial clusters in less developed countries: Review of experiences and research agendas [M]. Brighton: IDS, 1994
[299] Schmitz, H. From ascribed to earned trust in exploring clusters [J]. Journal of International Economics, 1999(48): 139-150
[300] Schmitz, H. Does local co-operation matter? Evidence from industrial clusters in South Asia and Latin America [J]. Oxford Development Studies, 2000, 28(3): 323-336
[301] Schulze, W. Two schools of thought in resource-based theory [A]. Shrivastiva, P. et al. Advances in strategic management [C]. New York: JAI Press, 1994: 127-151
[302] Scott, A. J. & Storper, M. Industrialization and regional development [A]. Storper, M. & Scott, A. Pathways to industrialization and regional development [C]. London: Routledge, 1992b: 3-17
[303] Scott, A. J. & Storper, M. Regional development reconsidered [A]. Ernste, H. & Meier, V. Regional development and contemporary industrial response: Extending flexible specialization [C]. London: Belhaven, 1992: 1-24
[304] Scott, J. Social network analysis - a handbook [M]. London: Sage publishing, 1991
[305] Selznick, P. Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation [M]. New York: Harper & Row, 1957
[306] Sengenberger, W. & Loveman, M. Smaller units of employment: a synthesis report of industrial reorganization in industrial countries [A]. Sengenberger, W. & Loveman, M. New Industrial organization programme [C]. Geneva: ILO, 1987
[307] Shane, S. A. Hybrid organizational arrangements and their implications for firm growth and survival: A study of new franchisors [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39:216-234
[308] Shrivastava, P. Strategic decision-making process: The influence of organizational learning and experience [D]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, 1981
[309]Simmie, J. Innovation, networks and learning regions [M]? London: Jessica Kingsley, 1997
[310]Simmie, J. & Sennett, J. Innovative clusters: global or local linkages [J]? National Institute Economic Review, 1999,170: 70 - 81
[311] Simon, H. A. On the behavioural and rational foundations of economic dynamics [A]. Day, R. M. & Eliasson, G. The Dynamics of Market Economics [C]. North Holland: Amsterdam, 1986: 21-44
[312] Simpson, W. Urban structure and the labour market: worker mobility, commuting and underemployment in cities [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992
[313] Slater, S. F. & Narver, J. G Does competitive environment moderate the market oritation - performance relationship [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1994(58): 46-55
[314] Smith, P. C. & Laage-Hellman, J. Small group analysis in industrial networks [A]. Axelsson, B. & Easton, G Industrial networks - a new view of reality [C]. London: Routledge, 1992: 37-61
[315] Spender, J. C. Industry recipes: An enquiry into the nature and sources of managerial judgement [J]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989
[316] Spender, J. C. Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? Unpacking the concept and its strategic implications [A]. Moingeon, B. & Edmondson, A. Organizational learning and competitive advantage [C]. CA: Sage, Newburg Park, 1996
[317] Spender, J. C. & Grant, R. M. Knowledge and the firm: Overview [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996(17): 5-9
[318] Sproull, L. S. & Cohen, M. D. Organizational learning [M]. London: Sage: 1996
[319] Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L. & Christensen, K. The resource-based view and marketing: the role of market-based assets and gaining competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(6): 777-802
[320] St. John, A. H. & Pouder, R. Technology clusters versus industry clusters: resources, networks, and regional advantages [J]. Growth and Change, 2006, 37(2): 141-171
[321] Stata, R. Organizational learning - the key to management innovation [J]. Sloan Management Review, 1989, Spring: 63-74
[322] Steinter, E. M. The discreet charm of clusters: An introduction [A]. Steinter, E. M. Clusters and regional specialisation on geography technology and networks [C], 1998: 1-17
[323] Stewart, F. & Ghani, E. How significant are externalities for development [J]? World Development, 1991, 19 (6): 569-594
[324] Storper, M. The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies [J]. Journal of European Urban and Regional Studies, 1995(2): 191-221
[325] Storper, M. The regional world: territorial development in a global economy [M]. London: Guilford Press, 1997
[326] Suchman, M. C. On advice of counsel: law firms and venture capital funds as information intermediaries in the structuration of silicon valley [D]. Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, 1994
[327] Swann, P. & Prevezer, M. A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology [J]. Research Policy, 1996(25): 1139-1157
[328] Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., et al. Knowledge clusters and competitive advantage in global industries. Paper presented at the 19th Annual International Conference of the Strategic Management Society, Berlin, 1999, September
[329] Teece, D. J. Economic of scope and the scope of the enterprise [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1980(1): 223-247
[330] Teece, D. J. Toward an economic theory of the multiproduct firm [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982(3): 39-63
[331] Teece, D. J. Firm boundaries , technological innovation, and strategic management [A]. Thomas, L. G. The economics of strategic plannings, III [C]. Lexington, MA: Lexington, 1986a: 187-199
[332] Teece, D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy [J]. Research Policy, 1986b(15): 285-305
[333] Teece, D. J, Pisano, G & Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997(18): 509-533
[334] Thompson, A. A. & Strickland, A. J. Strategic management: concepts and cases [M]. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1990
[335] Thorelli, H. B. Networks: between markets and hierarchies [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1986(7): 37-51
[336] Tripas, M. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: evidence from the typesetter industry [J]. Industry & Corporation Change, 1997, 6(2): 342-378
[337] Tripsas, M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997(18): 119-142
[338] Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41(4): 464-478
[339] Tushman, M. L. & O'Reilly III, C. A. Winning through innovation: a practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal [M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2002
[340] van der Panne, G. Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs [J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2004,14(5): 593-604
[341] Van de Ven, A. H. Central problems in the management of innovation [J]. Management Science, 1986, 32(5): 590-607
[342] Venkatraman N. & Ramanujam, V. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1986(11): 801-814
[343] Von Hippel, E. Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading [J]. Research Policy, 1987(16): 291-302
[344] Von Hippel, E. The Sources of Innovation [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988
[345] Von Hippel, E. "Sticky information" and the locus of problem solving [J]. Management Science, 1994(4): 429-439
[346] Weiner, N. & Mahoney, T. A model of corporate performance as a function of environmental, organizational, and leadership influences [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1981(24): 453-470
[347] Wernerfelt, B. A resource-based view of the firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(2): 171-180
[348] Wernerfelt, B. From critical resources to corporate strategy [J]. Journal of General Management, 1989, 14(3): 4-12
[349] Wernerfelt, B. Resource-based strategy in a stochastic model [A]. Montgomery, C. A. Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm [C]. Boston: Kluwer, 1995
[350] Williams, J. Strategy and the search for rents: the evolution of diversity among firms [J]. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, 1992
[351 ] Williamson, O. E. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications [M]. New York: Free Press, 1975
[352] Williamson, O. E. Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange [J]. American Economic Review, 1983(83): 519-540
[353] Williamson, O. E. The economic institutions of capitalism [M]. New York: Free Press, 1985
[354] Williamson, O. E. Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization [A]. Rumelt, R. P., Schendel, D. E. & Teece, D. J. Fundamental Issues in Strategy [C]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994: 361-402
[355] Wright, P., Dunford, B. & Snell, S. Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(6): 701-721
[356] Yin, R. Case study research [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1984
[357] Young, A. Increasing Returns and Economic Progress [J]. Economic Journal, 1928(38): 537-540
[358] Zander, U. & Kogut, B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test [J]. Organizational Science, 1995(6): 76-92
[359] Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. & Brewer, M. B. Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises [J]. American Economic Review, 1998, 88 (1): 290-306
[360] 安虎森．空间接近与不确定性的降低fJ]．南开经济研究，2001(3)：51-56
[361] 蔡宁，吴结兵．企业集群的竞争优势：资源的结构性整合．中国工业经济，2002(7)：45-50
[362] 耿帅．基于共享性资源观的集群企业竞争优势研究[D]．博士学位论文，浙江大学，2004：43-63
[363] 《海宁市志》编纂委员会．海宁市志[M]．上海：汉语大词典出版社，1995：191-194
[364] 金祥荣，柯荣住．对专业市场的一种交易费用经济学解释[J]．经济研究，1997(4)：74-79
[365] 李怀祖．管理研究方法论[M]．西安：西安交通大学出版社，2004：89-101
[366] 迈克尔·波特．国家竞争优势[M]．北京：华夏出版社，2002：116-132
[367] 仇保兴．小企业集群研究[M]．上海：复旦大学出版社，1999：26-33
[368] 王缉慈，童昕．简论我国地方企业集群的研究意义[J]．经济地理，2001(5)：550-553
[369] 韦伯．工业区位论(1929年版)[M]．北京：商务印书馆，1997：25-36
[370] 魏后凯．对产业集群与竞争力的考察[J]．经济管理，2003(6)：4-11
[371] 魏江．产业集群—创新系统与技术学习[M]．北京：科学出版社，2003：15-21
[372] 吴晓波，耿帅，徐松屹．基于共享性资源的集群企业竞争优势分析[J]．研究与发展管理，2004(4)：1-7
[373] 吴晓波，耿帅．区域集群自稔性风险成因分析[J]．经济地理，2003(6)：726-730
[374] 谢洪明，刘常勇，陈春辉．市场导向与组织绩效的关系：组织学习与创新的影响[J]．管理世界，2006(2)：80-94
[375] 叶康涛．案例研究：从个案分析到理论创建[J]．管理世界，2006(2)：139-143
[376] 约瑟夫·熊彼特．经济发展理论[M]．北京：商务印书馆，1990：1-15
[2] Ahrne, G. Social organizations. Interaction inside, outside and between organizations [M]. London: Sage Publishings, 1994
[3] Almeida, P & Kogut, B. The exploration of technological diversity and geographic localization in innovation: start-up firms in the semi-conductor industry [J]. Small Business Economics, 1997, 9(1): 21-31
[4] Altenburg, T. & Meyer-Stamer, J. How to promote clusters: policy experiences from Latin American [J]. World Development, 1999(27): 1693-1713
[5] Alvarez, S. & Busenitz, L. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory [J]. Journal of Management, 2001 (6): 755-775
[6] Amin, A. The globalization of the economy. An erosion of regional networks [A]? Grabher, G. The embedded firm. On the socioeconomics of industrial networks [C]. London: Routledge, 1993:278-295
[7] Amit, R. & Schoemaker, E Strategic assets and organizational rent [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993(15): 5-9
[8] Anderson, E. & Coughlan, A. Y. International market entry and expansion via independent or integrated channels of distribution [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1987(51): 71-82
[9] Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. & Holm, U. The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002(23): 979-996
[10] Andrews, K. R. The concept of corporate strategy [M]. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1971
[11] Ansoff, H. I. Corprorate strategy [M]. New York: McGraw Hill, 1965
[12] Argyres, N. Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(2): 129-150
[13] Argyris, C. & Schon, D. Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective [J]. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978
[14] Asheim, P. Industrial districts as 'learning regions' [J]. European Planning Studies, 1996(4): 379-400
[15] Audretsch, D. B. & Feldman, M. P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production [J]. American Economic Review, 1996, 86 (3): 630-652
[16] Aydalot, P. Milieux innovateurs en Europe [M]. GREMI, Paris, 1986
[17] Aydalot, P. & Keeble, D. High technology industry and innovative environments in Europe [A]. Aydalot, P. & Keeble, D. High technology industry and innovative environments: the European perspective [C]. London: Routledge, 1988:1-21
[18] Balconi, M., Breschi, S. & Lissoni, F. Networks of inventors and the location of academic research: an exploration of Italian patent data [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(1): 127-145
[19]Baptista, R. Clusters, innovation and growth: A survey of the literature [A]. Swann, P., Prevenzer, M. & Stout, D. The Dynamics of Industrial Clusters: International Comparisons in Computing and Biotechnology [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998: 13-51
[20]Baptista, R. & Swann, P. Do firms in clusters innovate more [J]? Research Policy, 1998, 27(5): 525-540
[21]Barkema, H. G, Bell J. H. J. & Pennings, J. M. Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(2): 151-166
[22]Barnett, W. P., Greve, H. R. & Park, D. Y. An evolutionary model of organizational performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994(15): 11-28
[23]Barney, J. B. Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy [J]. Management Science, 1986(32): 1231-1241
[24]Barney, J. B. Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis [J]. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 1988(9): 71-78
[25]Barney, J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1): 99-120
[26]Barney, J. B. Looking inside for competitive advantage [J]. Academy of Management Executive, 1995, 9(4): 48-61
[27]Barney, J. B. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage [M]. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1997
[28]Barney, J. B. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten year retrospective on the resource-based view [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(27): 643-650
[29]Barney, J. B. & Ouchi, W. G Organizational Economics: Toward a New Paradigm for Understanding and Studying Organizations [M]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1986
[30] Barney, J., Wright, W. & Ketchen, D. J. Jr. The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991 [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(27): 625-641
[31]Becanttini, G. Sectors and/or districts: some remarks on the conceptual foundations of industrial economics [A]. Goodman, E., Bamford, J. & Saynor, P. Small firms and industrial districts in Italy [C]. London: Routledge, 1989: 123-135
[32]Becattini, G. The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion [A]. Pyke, F., Becattini, G & Sengenberger, W. Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration [C]. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990:37-51
[33]Becattini, G distretto industriale marshalliano come concetto socio-economico [A]. Pyke, F., Becattino, G. & Sengenberger, W. Distretti industrialize cooperazione tra imprese in Italia [C]. di Studi e Informazione della Banca Toscana, 1991:34-35
[34]Bell, G. G Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005(26): 287-295
[35]Benner, M. & Tushman, M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003(28): 238-256
[36]Bergh, D. D. Size and relatedness of units sold: An agency theory and resource-based perspective [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995,16(3): 221-240
[37]Berson, Y., Nemanich, L. A., Waldman, D. A., et al. Leadership and organizational learning: a multiple levels perspective [J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2006(17): 577-594
[38]Beyer, J. M. Ideologies, values and decision making in organization [A]. Nystrom, P. C. & Starbuck, W. H. Handbook of organization design [C]. NY: Oxford University Press, 1981(2): 166-202
[39]Bianchi, P. & Bellini, N. Public policies for local networks of innovators [J]. Research Policy, 1991,20: 487-497
[40]Blankenburg, D. & Johanson, J. Managing network connections in international business [J]. Scandinavian International Business Review, 1992(1): 5-19
[41]Blaug, M. Economic theory in retrospect [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985
[42]Bortagaray, I. & Tiffin, S. Innovation clusters in Latin America [A]. In Fourth International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, Curitiba, Brazil, 2000:28-31
[43]Borys, B. & Jemison, D. B. Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14:234-249
[44]Boschma, R.A. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment [J]. Regional Studies, 2005(39): 61-74
[45]Bourdieu, P. La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement [M]. Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1979
[46]Bower, G H. & Hilgard, E. R. Theories of learning [M]. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981
[47]Braczyk, H., Cooke, P. & Heidenreich, M. Regional Innovation Systems [M]. London: UCL Press, 1998
[48]Bradach, J. L. Using the plural form in management of restaurant chains [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997(42): 276-303
[49]Breschi, S. & Lissoni, F. Localized knowledge spillovers versus innovative milieux: knowledge 'tacitness' reconsidered [J]. Regional Science, 2001a(80): 255-273
[50]Breschi, S. & Lissoni, F. Knowledge spillovers and local innovation system: a critical survey [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2001b(10): 975-1005
[51]Brusco, S. The idea of the industrial district: its genesis. In Industrial Districts and Inter- firm Co-operation in Italy [A]. Pyke, F., Becattini, G. & Sengenbeger, W. International Institute for Labour Studies: Geneva, 1990: 10-19
[52]Brusco, S. Rules of the game in industrial districts [A]. Grandori, A. Interfirm networks: Organization and industrial Competitiveness [C]. London, UK: Routledg, 1999: 17-40
[53]Buck, N., Crookston, M., Gordon, I. et al. A socio-economic assessment of London: A report by Llewelyn Davies and Partners [M]. London: Association for London Government, 1997
[54]Burgalman, R. A. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983(28): 223-224
[55]Burt, R. S. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1987, 92(May): 1287-1335
[56]Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T. & Zhao, Y. S. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2002(31): 515-524
[57]Camagni, R. Innovation networks: spatial perspectives [M]. London: Bellhaven Press, 1991
[58]Caniels, M. C. J. & Romijn H. A. What drives innovativeness in industrial clusters? Transcending the debate [A]. Presented at the Regional Studies Association International Conference, Pisa, Italy, 2003
[59]Cantner, U. & Graf, H. Cooperation and specialization in German technology regions [J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2004,14(5): 543-562
[60]Capello, R. Spatial and sectorial characteristics of relational capital in innovation activity [J]. European Planning Studies, 2002(10): 177-200
[61]Carrie, A. S. From extended enterprises to regional clusters - the changing basis of competition [A]. Coopers. Manufacturing leadership: Through the extended enterprise [C]. London UK: Technology Publishing Ltd, 2000: 127-130
[62] Carrol, G & Teo, A. Creative destruction among organizations: an empirical study of technical innovation and organizational failure in the American automobile industry, 1885-1981 [J]. Industry & Corporation Change, 1996, 5(2): 619-644
[63]Castanias, R. & Helfat, C. Managerial resources and rents [J]. Journal of Management, 1991(17): 155-171
[64]Chakravarthy, B. S. Measuring strategic performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1986(7): 437-458
[65] Chandler, A. D. Strategy and structure. Cambridge [M]. MA: MIT Press, 1962
[66]Chatterjee, S. & Wernerfelt, B. The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12(1): 33-48
[67]Chesbrough, H. W. The Era of Open Innovation [J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003, Spring
[68] Chi, T. Trading in strategic resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(4): 271-290
[69] Cho, H. D. & Lee, J. K. The development path of networking capability of catch-up players in Korea's semiconductor industry [J]. R&D Management, 2003, 4:411-423
[70] Christensen, P. Forsstrom, B. Lindmark, L. et al. Firms in network, spatial impacts and policy implications [A]. Illeris, S. & Jacobsen, L. Networks and regional development [C]. Kopenhamn: Akademisk Forlag, 1990: 11-58
[71] Cohen, W. M & Levinthal, D. A. Innovation and learning: two faces of R&D [J]. Economic Journal, 1989(99): 569-596
[72] Cohen, W. M & Levinthal, D. A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990(35): 128-152
[73]Cohendet, P., Llerena, P. & Marengo, L. Theory of the firm in an evolutionary perspective: A critical assessment [A]. Presented at the 2nd Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, Paris, 1998
[74] Combs, J. G & Ketchen, Jr., D. J. Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economies [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(9): 867-888
[75] Conner, K. R. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization theory: Do we have a new theory of the firm [J]. Journal of Management, 1991(17): 121-155
[76] Conner, K. R & Prahalad, C. K. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism [J]. Organization Science, 1996(7): 477-501
[77] Cook, K. S. & Emerson, R. M. Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks [J]. American Sociological Review, 1978(43): 721-739
[78]Cooke, P. M., Uranga, G. & Etxebarria, G Regional innovation systems: institutional and organizational dimensions [J]. Research Policy, 1997(26): 475-491
[79]Cooke, P. M. Knowledge economies. Clusters, learning and cooperative advantage [M]. London: Routledge, 2002
[80]Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. & Braczyk, H.-J. Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, 2nd ed [M]. Routledge, London, New York, 2004
[81]Cooke, P. M. & Memedovic, O. Strategies for Regional Innovation Systems: Learning Transfer and Applications. Policy Papers, UNIDO, Vienna, 2003
[82]Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999(24): 522-537
[83]Cyert, R.M. & March, J.G A behavioral theory of the firm [M]. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963
[84]Czamanski, S. & Ablas, L. A. Identification of industrial clusters and complexes: a comparison of methods and findings [J]. Urban Studies, 1979,16(1): 61-80
[85] Daft, R. L. & Weick, K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984(9): 284-295
[86]Damanpour, F. Organizational innovation: a metaanalysis of effects of determinants and moderators [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(3): 555-590
[87] Darby, M. R. & Zucker, L. G. Growing by leaps and inches: Creative destruction, real cost reduction, and inching up [J]. Economic Inquiry, 2003(41): 1-18
[88]David, H. & Wersching, K. On technological specialization in industrial clusters: an agent-based analysis [EB/01]. http:// www. wiwi. uni-bielefeld. de/ -dawid/ papers/ WP- Specialization.pdf, 2005
[89]Day, G. S. The capabilities of market-driven organizations [J]. Journal of Market, 1994(58): 37-52
[90]Debresson, C. & Amesse, F. Networks of innovators: a review and an introduction to the issue [J]. Research Policy, 1991, 20(5): 363-380
[91]Dicken, P. Global shift: the internationalization of economic activity (2nd ed) [M]. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 1992
[92]Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage [J]. Management Science, 1989(35): 1504-1514
[93]Dore, R. Taking Japan seriously [M]. Palo Alto, CA: Standford University Press, 1987.
[94]Dosi, G Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1988, 26(September): 1120-1171
[95]Dosi, G, Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000
[96]Duncan, R. B. Modifications in decision structures in adapting to the environment: some implications for organizational learning [J]. Decision Science, 1974: 705-725
[97]Dutton, J. & Duncan, R. Sense-making and organizational adaptation. Working Paper, Northwestern University, J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, 1982(March)
[98] Dyer, J. H. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(4): 271-292
[99]Easton, G & Lundgren, A. Changes in industrial networks as flow through nodes [A]. Axelsson, B. & Easton, G Industrial networks - A new view of reality [C]. London: Routledge, 1992: 24, 88-104
[100] Edquist, C. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations [M]. London: Pinter Publishers, 1997
[101]Eisenhardt, K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989(14): 57-74
[102] Ellis, H. C. The transfer of learning [M]. New York: Macmillan, 1965
[103] Enright, M. J. Regional clusters and firm strategy [A]. Chandler, A. D. et al. The dynamic firm: the role of technology, strategy, organization, and regions [C]. Oxford: 1999:315-342
[104] Erramilli, M. K. & Rao, C. P. Choice of foreign market entry modes by service firms: Role of market knowledge [J]. Management International Review, 1990, 30(2): 135-150
[105]Estes, W. K. Learning theory and mental development [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1970
[106] Evans, P. A. L. Dosing the glue: applying human resource technology to build the global organization [A]. Shaw, B. & Kirkbride, P. Research in personnel and human resources management: Volume 3 [C]. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1993: 21-54
[ 107] Feldman, M. P. The geography of innovation [M]. London, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994
[108] Ferguson, T. D., Deephouse, D. L. & Ferguson, W. L. Do strategic groups differ in reputation [J]? Strategic Management Journal, 2000(21): 1195-1214
[109] Feser, E. J. & Bergman, E. M. National industry cluster templates: a framework for applied regional cluster analysis [J]. Regional Studies, 2000, 34(1): 1-19
[110] Feser, E. J. Old and new theories of industry clusters [A]. Steiner, E. M. Clusters and regional specialisation on geography technology and networks [C], 1998: 18-39
[111]Fiol, C. M. Management culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991(17): 191-211
[112] Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. A. Organizational learning [J]. Academy of Management, 1985,10(4): 803-813
[113] Fisher, M.M. The innovation process and network activity of manufacturing firms [A]. Fisher, M.M., Suarez-Vilia, L. & Steiner, M. Innovation, networks and localities [C]. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1999: 11-27
[114] Florida, R. Regional creative destruction: production organization, globalization and the economic transformation of the Midwest [J]. Economic Geography, 1996, 72(3): 314-334
[115] Foss, K. & Foss, N. J. Learning in firms: knowledge-based and property rights perspectives [J]. European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 2000, 14(2): 119-141
[116] Foss, N. J. Higher-order industrial capabilities and competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Industry Studies, 1996(3): 1-20
[117] Foster, G Financial statement analysis [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pentice-Hall, 1986
[118] Freeman, C. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan [M]. London: Frances Pinter, 1987
[119] Freeman, C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues [J]. Research Policy, 1991(20): 499-514
[120] Freeman, C. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan [M]. London: Frances Pinter, 1992
[121]Fritsch, M. R&D co-operation and the efficiency of regional innovation activities [J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2004, 28 (6): 829-846
[122] Gadde, L.-E. & Mattsson, L.-G. Stability and change in network relationships [J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1987(4): 29-41
[123]Geroski, P. Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability [A]. Stoneman, P. Handbook of the Economies of Innovation and Technological Change [C]. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, 1995: 90-131
[124] Gibson, C. B. & Birkinshaw, J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004(47): 209-226
[125]Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A. et al. Growth in cities [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 100(6): 1126-1152
[126]Glynn, M. A. Innovation genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligence to innovation [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(4): 1081-1111
[127] Gordon, L. R. & McCann, R Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks [J]? Urban Studies, 2000, 37(3): 513-532
[128] Grabher, G Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations [A]. Grabher, G The embeddedness firm. On the socioeconomics of industrial networks [C]. London: Routledge, 1993: 1-32
[129] Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973(78): 1360-1380
[130] Granovetter, M. S. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1985(91): 481-510
[131] Granovetter, M. S. The social construction of economic institutions [A]. Etzoni, A. & Lawrence, R. Socio-economics: towards a new synthesis [C]. New York: Armonk, 1991:75-81
[132] Granovetter, M. S. Problems of explanation in economic sociology [A]. Nohria, N. & Eccles, R. Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action [C]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1992: 25-56
[133] Grant, R. The resource based theory of competitive advantage, implications for strategy formulation [J]. California Management Review, 1991 (Spring): 114-135
[134] Grant, R. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996(17): 109-122
[135] Gray, B. & Wood, D. J. Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory [J]. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1991, 27(1): 3-22
[136]Gregersen, B. & Johnson, B. Learning economics, innovation systems and Europesn integration [J]. Regional Studies, 1997, 31(5): 479-490
[137]GuIyani, S. Effects of poor transportation on lean production and industrial clustering: evidence from the Indian Auto Industry [J]. World Development, 2001,29(7): 1157-1177
[138] Hair, J. F, Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R.L. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. [M]. Prentice Hall College Div, 1998
[139] Hakansson, H. Industrial technological development. A network approach [M]. London: Croom Helm, 1987
[140] Hakansson, H. Corporate technological behavior: cooperation and networks [M]. London: Routledge, 1989
[141] Hakansson, H. & Johanson, J. A model of industrial networks [J]. Working Paper, Department of Business Administration, University of Uppsala, 1985
[142] Hakansson, H. & Senhota, I. Developing relationships in business networks [M]. London: Routledge, 1995
[143]Halinen, A. & Tornroos, J.-A. The role of embeddedness in the evolution of business networks [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1998, 14(3): 187-205
[144] Hall, R. The strategic analysis of intangible resources [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992(13): 135-144
[145]Hambrick, D. C. Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1983(26): 5-26
[146]Hamel, G. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 1991(12): 83-103
[147]Hamel, G & Prahalad, C. K. Competing for the Future [M]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994
[148] Harrison, B. Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles [J]? Regional Studies, 1991(26): 469-483
[149] Harrison, B. Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1994
[150] Harrison, B., Kelley, M. R. & Gant, J. Innovative firm behavior and local milieu: exploring the intersection of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change [J]. Economic Geography, 1996, 72(3): 233-258
[151] Harrison, J. S. & Freeman, R. E. Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical evidence [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(5): 479-485
[152]Hedberg, B. How organization learn and unlearn [A]? Nystrom, P. C. & Starbuck, W. H. Handbook of organizational design [C]. London: Oxford University Press, 1981: 8-27
[153] Henderson, R. & Clark, K. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms [J]. Administration Science Quarterly, 1990(35): 9-30
[154] Henderson, R. & Cockburn, I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994(15): 63-84
[155]Hendry, C. Understanding and creating whole organizational change through learning theory [J]. Hum Relat, 1996, 49(5): 621-641
[156]Hesterly, W. S., Liebeskind, J. & Zenger, T. R. Organizational economics: An impending revolution in organization theory [J]? Academy of Management Review, 1990(15): 402-420
[157] Hill, C. W. L., Hitt, M. A. & Hoskisson, R. E. Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms [J]. Organization Science, 1992(3): 501-521
[158] Hitt, M. A & Irenland, R. D. Relationships among corporate-level distinctive competencies, diversification strategy, corporate structure and performance [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1986(23): 401-416
[159] Hitt, M. A. & Irenland, R. D. Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1985(6): 273-293
[160] Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E. & Kim, H. International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firm [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1997(40): 767-798
[161]Hofer, C. W. ROVA: A new measure for assessing organizational performance [A]. Lmab, R. B. Advances in strategies management [C]. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983(2): 43-55
[162] Hoover, E. M. Location theory and the shoe and leather industries [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937
[163] Hoover, E. M. The location of economic activity [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948
[164]Hrebiniak, L. G & Joyce, W. F. Implementing strategy [M]. New York: Macmillan, 1984
[165]Huber, G P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature [J]. Organization Science, 1991(2): 88-115
[166] Ingham, H. & Thompson, S. Wholly-owned versus collaborative ventures for diversifying financial services [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(4): 325-334
[167]Isard, W. & Kuenne, R. E. The impact of steel upon the Greater New York-Philadelphia industrial region [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1953(35): 289-301
[168] Isard, W. & Vietorisz, T. Industrial complex analysis and regional development with particular reference to Puerto Rico [J]. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 1955(1): 229-247
[169]Itami, H & Roehl, T. W. Mobilizing invisible assets [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987
[170] Jacobs, D. & De Man, A. P.. Clusters, industrial policy and firm strategy: A menu approach [J]. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1996(8): 425-437
[171]Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3): 577-598
[172] Javidan, M. Core competence: What does it mean in practice [J]? Long Range Planning, 1998, 31(1): 60-71
[173] Jerez-Gomez, P., Cespedes, J. & Valle-Cabrera, R. Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2005(58): 715-725
[174] Johanson, J. & Mattsson, L.-G International marketing and internationalization process - a network approach [A]. Turnbull, P. W. & Paliwoda, S. J. Research in international marketing [C]. London: Croom Helm, 1986: 234-265
[175] Johanson, J. & Mattsson, L.-G Network positions and strategic action - an analytic framework [A]. Axelsson, B. & Easton, G Industrial networks - a new view of reality [C]. London: Routledge, 1992: 205-217
[176] Kaldor, N. Interregional trade and cumulative causation [A]. Economics without equilibrium [C]. New York: Sharpe, 1985: 57-79
[177] Kaplan, R. S. Yesterday's accounting undermines production [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1984(62): 95-101
[178]Karim, S. & Mitchell, W. Path-dependent and path-breaking change: reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978-1995 [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10): 1061-1081
[179]Keeble, D., Lawson, C, Moore, B. et al. Collective learning processes, networking and institutional thickness in the Cambridge region [J]. Regional Studies, 1999, 33(4): 319-331
[180]Ketels, C. The development of the cluster concept - present experiences and further developments [A]. Paper prepared for the NRW Conference on Clusters, Duisburg, Germany, 5 Dec 2003
[181] King, D. R., Covin, J. G & Hegarty, W. H. Complementary resources and the exploitation of technological innovation [J]. Journal of Management, 2003, 29(4): 589-606
[182]Knott, A. M. Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003(24): 687-705
[183] Krugman, P. Geography and trade [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991
[184]Krugman, P. Increasing returns and economic geography [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1991(99): 483-499
[185]Laat, M. F. de. Collectief leren in organisaties met behulp van ICT [J]. Opleiding en Ontwikkeling, 2001,14(3): 21-24
[186] Lane, P. J. & Lubatkin, M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998(19): 461-477
[187] Lawrence, P. R. & Dyer, D. Renewing American industry [M]. New York: Free Press, 1983.
[188] Lawson, C. & Lorenz, E. Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity [J]. Regional Studies, 1999, 33 (4): 305-317
[189] Lawson, C. Towards a competence theory of the region [J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1999(23): 151-166
[190]Lazaric, N. & Lorenz, E. Trust and organizational learning during inter-firm cooperation [A]. Lazaric, N. & Lorenz, E. The economics of trust and learning [C]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997
[191]Lazerson, M. Subcontracting in the Modena knitwear district [A]. Pyke, F., Becattini, G, & Sengenberger, W. Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy [C]. Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990
[192] Lazerson, M. & Lorenzoni, G The firms that feed industrial districts: a return to the Italian source [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1999, 8(2): 235-266
[193] Learned, E. P., Christensen, C. R. & Andrews, K. R. et al. Business policy [M]. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1969
[194]Lechner, C. & Dowling, M. Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms [J]. Enterpreneurship & Regional Development, 2003(15): 1-26
[195] Leonard, D. & Swap, W. Gurus in the garage [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2000, 78(6): 71-78
[196] Leonard-Barton, D. Core Capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development [J]. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 1992(13): 111-125
[ 197] Levinthal, D. & Myatt, J. Co-evolution of capabilities and industry: the evolution of mutual fund processing [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994(15): 45-62
[198] Levitt, B. & March, J. Organizational learning [A]. Cohen, M. D. & Sproull, L. S. Organizational learning [C]. CA: Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1996: 516-541
[199] Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P. & Carroll, T. The co-evolution of new organizational forms [J]. Organization Science, 1999(10): 535-550
[200] Lippman, S. & Rumelt, R. Uncertain limitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition [J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1982(13): 418-438
[201]Lockett, A. & Thompson, S. The resource-based view and economics [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(6): 723-754
[202] Lundvall, B. User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalization [A]. Lundvall, B. National systems of innovation: towards atheory of innovation and interactive learning [C]. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992: 45-67
[203] Lundvall, B. National systems of innovation: toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning [M]. London: Frances Pinter, 1992
[204]Mabey, C. & Salaman, G. Strategic human resource management [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995
[205] Mahoney, J. & Pandian, R. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992(13): 363-380
[206] Mahoney, J. T. & Pandian, J. R. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992,13(5): 363-380
[207] Maillat, D. The innovation process and the role of the Milieu [A]. Bergman, E., Mailer, G & Todtling, F. Regions reconsidered: economic networks, innovation and local development in industrialized countries [C]. London: Routledge, 1991: 103-117
[208] Maillat, D. Territorial dynamic, innovative milieus and regional policy [J]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1995(7): 157-165
[209] Makadok, R. Interfirm differences in scale economies and the evolution of market shares [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(10): 935-952
[210]Malecki, E. Soft variables in regional science [J]. Review of Regional Studies, 2000(30): 61-69
[211] Malerba, F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production [J]. Research Policy, 2002,31 (2): 247-264
[212]Malmberg, A. & Maskell, P. The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering [J]. Environment and Planning, 2002(34): 429-449
[213] March, J. G Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning [J]. Organization Science, 1991(2): 71-87
[214] March, J. G. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen [M]. Free Press: New York, 1994
[215]Marengo, L. Coordination and organization learning in the firm [J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economy, 1992(2): 313-326
[216] Markides, C. C. & Williamson, P. J. Corporate diversification and organization structure: A resource-based view [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39: 340-367
[217] Marshall, A. Principles of economics, 8th ed. [M]. London: Macmillan, 1925
[218] Martin, J. Stories and scripts in organizational settings [A]. Hastorf, A. & Isen, A. Cognitive social psychology [C]. New York: Elsevier-North Holland, 1982: 225-305
[219] Martin, R. E & Sunley, P. Paul Krugman's geographical economics and its implications for regional development theory: A critical assessment [J]. Economic Geography, 1996,72(3): 259-292
[220] Martin, R. E. & Justis, R. T. Franchising, liquidity constraints and entry [J]. Applied Economics, 1993,25: 1269-1277
[221] Mattsson, L.-G An application of a network approach to marketing - defining and changing market positions [A]. Dholakia, N. & Arndt, J. Changing the course of marketing. Alternative paradigms for widening marketing theory [C]. Greenwish: JAI Press, CT, 1985: 263-288
[222] Mattsson, L.-G Indirect relations in industrial networks - a conceptual analysis of their strategic significance [A]. Presented at the 3rd IMP Conference, Lyon, 1986
[223] McCann, P. Rethinking the economics of location and agglomeration [J]. Urban Studies, 1995(32): 563-577
[224] McCann, P. The economics of industrial location: a logistics-costs approach [M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 1998
[225] McEvily, B. & Zaheer, A. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999(20): 1133-1156
[226] McGrath, R. G Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001(44): 118-131
[227]McKee, D. An organizational learning approach to product innovation [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1992(9): 234
[228]Melin, L. The field-of-force metaphor [A]. Covusgil, T. S. Advances in international marketing [C]. Greenwish: JAI Press, CT, 1989, 3: 161-179
[229] Meyer-Stamer, J. Path dependence in regional development: persistence and change in three industrial clusters in Santa Catarina, Brazil [J]. World Development, 1998, 26(8): 1495 - 1511
[230] Meyer-Stamer, J. Regional and locational policy what can we learn from the ceramics and textiles/ clothing clusters of Santa Catarina, Brazil [A]. In Building a modern and effective business development services industry in Latin America and the Caribbean. Duisberg [C]. Germany/Joinville Brazil: Institute for Development and Peace/Fundac_(?)ao Empreender, 1999
[231] Miller, D. & Shamsie, J. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: the Hollywood film studio from 1936 to 1965 [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(3): 519-543
[232] Molina-Morales, F. X. European industrial districts: influence of geographic concentration on performance of the firm [J]. Journal of International Management, 2001(7): 277-294
[233] Molina-Morales, F. X. Industrial districts and innovation: the case of the Spanish ceramic tiles industry [J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2002(14): 317-335
[234] Molina-Morales, F. X. & Mart'inez-Fernandez, M. T. The impact of industrial district affiliation on firm value creation [J]. European Planning Studies, 2003(11): 156-169
[235] Molina-Morales, F. X. & Mart'inez-Fernandez, M. T. How much difference is there between industrial district firms? A net value creation approach [J]. Research Policy, 2004(33): 473-486
[236] Monteverde, K. & Teece, D. J. Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry [J]. RAND, Journal of Economics, 1982(13): 206-213
[237] Montgomery, C, A. & Wemerfelt, B. Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q [J]. Rand Journal, 1988: 623-632
[238] Montgomery, C. A. & Hariharan, S. Diversified expansion by large established firms [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior, 1991: 71-89
[239] Morgan, K. The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal [J]. Research Policy, 1997, 31(5): 491-503
[240] Morosini, P. Managing cultural differences [M]. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1998
[241] Morosini, P. Competing on social capabilities: a defining strategic challenge of the new millennium [C]. IMD Working Paper 2002-1, IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002
[242] Morosini, P. Industrial clusters, knowledge integration and performance [J]. World Development, 2004, 32(2): 305-326
[243] Nagarajan, A. & Mitchell, W. Evolutionary diffusion: internal and external methods used to acquire encompassing, complementary, and incrementary technological changes in the Lithotripsy industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998(19): 1063-1077
[244] Nelson, R. R & Winter, S. G An evolutionary theory of economic change [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university Press, 1982
[245] Nelson, R. R. Why of firms differ and how does it matter [J]? Strategic Management Journal, 1991(12): 61-74
[246] Nelson, R. R. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993
[247] Nicholls-Nixon, C. Absorptive capacity and technological sourcing: implications for the responsiveness of established firms [D]. Ph. D. Dissertation, Purdue University, 1993
[248] Nohria, N. & Gulati, R. Is slack good or bad for innovation [J]? Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39(5): 1245-1264
[249]Nonaka, I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation [J]. Organization Science, 1994(5): 14-37
[250] North, D. C. Structure and Change in Economic History [M]. New York: W. W. Norton& Company, 1981
[251] Oerlemans, L., Meeus, M. & Boekema, F. Innovation and proximity: theoretical perspectives [A]. Green, M. & McNoughton, R. Industrial networks and proximity [C]. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000: 17-46
[252] Oerlemans, L., Meeus, M. & Boekema, F. On the spatial embeddedness of innovation networks: an exploration of the proximity effect [J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2001, 92(1): 60-75
[253] Ormrod, R. K. Local context and innovation diffusion in a well-connected world [J]. Economic Geography, 1990, 66(2): 109-122
[254] Paniccia, I. One, a hundred, thousands industrial districts. Organizational variety of local networks of small and medium-sized enterprises [J]. Organization Studies, 1998(4): 667-699
[255] Patrucco, P. P. Institutional variety, networking, and knowledge exchange: Communication and innovation in the case of the Brianza technological district [J]. Regional Science, 2003(37): 159-172
[256] Pegels, C. C, Song, Y. I. & Yang, B. Management heterogeneity, competitive interaction groups, and firm performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000(21): 911-923
[257] Peng, M. The resource-based view and international business [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(6): 803-829
[258] Pennings, J. M. & Harianto, F. The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992a, 13(1): 29-46
[259] Pennings, J. M. & Harianto, F. Technological networking and innovation implementation [J]. Organization Science, 1992b(3): 356-382
[260] Penrose, E. T. The theory of the growth of the firm [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1959
[261] Peteraf, M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993(14): 179-191
[262] Pettigrew, M.A. Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice [J]. Organization Science, 1990(1): 267-292
[263] Piore M. & Sabel, C. The second industrial divide: possibilities for properity [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1984
[264] Pitelis, C. Market and non-market hierarchies: Theory of institutional failure [M]. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993
[265] Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S. & Paine, J. et al. Organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research [J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(3): 513-563
[266] Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension [M]. New York: anchor Day, 1966
[267] Porter, M. E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations [M]. London: Macmillan, 1990
[268] Porter, M. E. Clusters and the new economics of competition [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1998, 76(6): 77-90
[269] Pouder, R & St. John, C. H. Hot spots and blind spots: geographical clusters of firms and innovation [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(4): 1192-1225
[270] Powell, W. W. Getting Into Print: The Decision-Making Process in Scholarly Publishing [M]. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, 1985
[271] Powell, W. W & Smith-Doerr, L. Networks and economic life [A]. Smelser, N. J & Swedberg, R. The Handbook of Economic Sociology [C]. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1994: 368-402
[272] Prahalad, C. K & Bettis, R. The dominant logic: Anew linkage between diversity and performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1986(7): 485-501
[273] Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G The core competence of the corporation [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990, May-June: 79-91
[274] Pratt, A. The emerging shape and form of innovation networks and institutions [A]. Simmie, J. Innovation, networks and learning region [C]? London: Jessica Kingsley, 1997
[275]Pyke, F, Becattini, G & Sengenberger, W. Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy [M]. Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990
[276] Rabellotti, R., Is there an "industrial district model"? Footwear districts in Italy and Mexico compared [J]. World Development, 1993(23): 29-41
[277] Rabellotti, R. Is there an industrial district flow? Footwear districts in Italy and Mexico compared [J]. World Development, 1995, 23(1): 29 - 41
[278] Rabellotti, R. Recovery of a Mexican cluster: devaluation bonanza or collective efficiency [J]. World Development, 1999,27(9): 1571 - 1585
[279] Rabellotti, R. & Schmitz, H. The internal heterogeneity of industrial districts in Italy, Brazil and Mexico [J]. Regional Studies, 1999(33): 97-108.
[280]Radner, R. The internal economy of large firms [J]. Economic Journal (Supplement), 1986(96): 1-22
[281]Ricardo, D. The principle of political economy and taxation [M]. Reprinted, London: J. M. Dent & Son, 1965, Original 1817
[282] Richardson, G. The organization of industry [J]. Economy Journal, 1972(82): 883-896
[283] Robert, P. W. & Dowling, G R. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002(23): 1077-1093
[284] Robins, J. & Wiersema, M. F. A resourcebased approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16(4): 277-300
[285] Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations (4th edn) [M]. Free Press: New York, 1995
[286]Rond'e, P. & Hussler, C. Innovation in regions: what does really matter [J]? Research Policy, 2005(34): 1150-1172
[287] Rosenberg, D. Cloning Silicon Valley: the next generation high-tech hotspots [M]. London, UK: Reuters/ Pearson Education, 2002
[288] Rosenfeld, S. A. Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development [J]. European Planning Studies, 1997(5): 3-23
[289] Rothaermel, F. T. Research note in cumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001(22): 687-699
[290] Rouse M. J. & Fouts, P. A. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997,40(3): 534-559
[291]Rumelt, R. P. Towards a strategic theory of the firm [A]. Larnb, R. B. Competitive Strategic Management [C]. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984:556-570
[292]Rumelt, R. P. Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship [A]. Teece, D. The competitive chanllenge. Cambridge [C]. MA: Ballinger, 1987: 137-158
[293] Sabel, C. Flexible specialization and the re-emergence of regional economies [A]. Hirst, P. & Zettlin, J. Reversing industrial decline? Industrial structure and policy in Britain and her competitors [C]. Oxford: Berg: 1989
[294] Salomon, I. & Schofer, J. Transportation and telecommunications costs: some implications for small countries [A]. Dietz, F., Heijman, W. & Shefer, D. Location and labour considerations for regional development [C]. Aldershot: Avebury, 1990:49-63
[295] Saxenian, A. L. Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994
[296] Saxenian, A. L., & Hsu, J. Y. The Silicon Valley - Hsinchu connection: technical communities and Industrial upgrading [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2001, 10(4): 893-920
[297] Scandura, T. Dysfunctional mentoring relationships and outcomes [J]. Journal of Management, 1998, 24(3): 449-467
[298] Schmitz, H. & Nadvi, K. Industrial clusters in less developed countries: Review of experiences and research agendas [M]. Brighton: IDS, 1994
[299] Schmitz, H. From ascribed to earned trust in exploring clusters [J]. Journal of International Economics, 1999(48): 139-150
[300] Schmitz, H. Does local co-operation matter? Evidence from industrial clusters in South Asia and Latin America [J]. Oxford Development Studies, 2000, 28(3): 323-336
[301] Schulze, W. Two schools of thought in resource-based theory [A]. Shrivastiva, P. et al. Advances in strategic management [C]. New York: JAI Press, 1994: 127-151
[302] Scott, A. J. & Storper, M. Industrialization and regional development [A]. Storper, M. & Scott, A. Pathways to industrialization and regional development [C]. London: Routledge, 1992b: 3-17
[303] Scott, A. J. & Storper, M. Regional development reconsidered [A]. Ernste, H. & Meier, V. Regional development and contemporary industrial response: Extending flexible specialization [C]. London: Belhaven, 1992: 1-24
[304] Scott, J. Social network analysis - a handbook [M]. London: Sage publishing, 1991
[305] Selznick, P. Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation [M]. New York: Harper & Row, 1957
[306] Sengenberger, W. & Loveman, M. Smaller units of employment: a synthesis report of industrial reorganization in industrial countries [A]. Sengenberger, W. & Loveman, M. New Industrial organization programme [C]. Geneva: ILO, 1987
[307] Shane, S. A. Hybrid organizational arrangements and their implications for firm growth and survival: A study of new franchisors [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39:216-234
[308] Shrivastava, P. Strategic decision-making process: The influence of organizational learning and experience [D]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, 1981
[309]Simmie, J. Innovation, networks and learning regions [M]? London: Jessica Kingsley, 1997
[310]Simmie, J. & Sennett, J. Innovative clusters: global or local linkages [J]? National Institute Economic Review, 1999,170: 70 - 81
[311] Simon, H. A. On the behavioural and rational foundations of economic dynamics [A]. Day, R. M. & Eliasson, G. The Dynamics of Market Economics [C]. North Holland: Amsterdam, 1986: 21-44
[312] Simpson, W. Urban structure and the labour market: worker mobility, commuting and underemployment in cities [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992
[313] Slater, S. F. & Narver, J. G Does competitive environment moderate the market oritation - performance relationship [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1994(58): 46-55
[314] Smith, P. C. & Laage-Hellman, J. Small group analysis in industrial networks [A]. Axelsson, B. & Easton, G Industrial networks - a new view of reality [C]. London: Routledge, 1992: 37-61
[315] Spender, J. C. Industry recipes: An enquiry into the nature and sources of managerial judgement [J]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989
[316] Spender, J. C. Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? Unpacking the concept and its strategic implications [A]. Moingeon, B. & Edmondson, A. Organizational learning and competitive advantage [C]. CA: Sage, Newburg Park, 1996
[317] Spender, J. C. & Grant, R. M. Knowledge and the firm: Overview [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996(17): 5-9
[318] Sproull, L. S. & Cohen, M. D. Organizational learning [M]. London: Sage: 1996
[319] Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L. & Christensen, K. The resource-based view and marketing: the role of market-based assets and gaining competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(6): 777-802
[320] St. John, A. H. & Pouder, R. Technology clusters versus industry clusters: resources, networks, and regional advantages [J]. Growth and Change, 2006, 37(2): 141-171
[321] Stata, R. Organizational learning - the key to management innovation [J]. Sloan Management Review, 1989, Spring: 63-74
[322] Steinter, E. M. The discreet charm of clusters: An introduction [A]. Steinter, E. M. Clusters and regional specialisation on geography technology and networks [C], 1998: 1-17
[323] Stewart, F. & Ghani, E. How significant are externalities for development [J]? World Development, 1991, 19 (6): 569-594
[324] Storper, M. The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies [J]. Journal of European Urban and Regional Studies, 1995(2): 191-221
[325] Storper, M. The regional world: territorial development in a global economy [M]. London: Guilford Press, 1997
[326] Suchman, M. C. On advice of counsel: law firms and venture capital funds as information intermediaries in the structuration of silicon valley [D]. Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, 1994
[327] Swann, P. & Prevezer, M. A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology [J]. Research Policy, 1996(25): 1139-1157
[328] Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., et al. Knowledge clusters and competitive advantage in global industries. Paper presented at the 19th Annual International Conference of the Strategic Management Society, Berlin, 1999, September
[329] Teece, D. J. Economic of scope and the scope of the enterprise [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1980(1): 223-247
[330] Teece, D. J. Toward an economic theory of the multiproduct firm [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982(3): 39-63
[331] Teece, D. J. Firm boundaries , technological innovation, and strategic management [A]. Thomas, L. G. The economics of strategic plannings, III [C]. Lexington, MA: Lexington, 1986a: 187-199
[332] Teece, D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy [J]. Research Policy, 1986b(15): 285-305
[333] Teece, D. J, Pisano, G & Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997(18): 509-533
[334] Thompson, A. A. & Strickland, A. J. Strategic management: concepts and cases [M]. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1990
[335] Thorelli, H. B. Networks: between markets and hierarchies [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1986(7): 37-51
[336] Tripas, M. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: evidence from the typesetter industry [J]. Industry & Corporation Change, 1997, 6(2): 342-378
[337] Tripsas, M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997(18): 119-142
[338] Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41(4): 464-478
[339] Tushman, M. L. & O'Reilly III, C. A. Winning through innovation: a practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal [M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2002
[340] van der Panne, G. Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs [J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2004,14(5): 593-604
[341] Van de Ven, A. H. Central problems in the management of innovation [J]. Management Science, 1986, 32(5): 590-607
[342] Venkatraman N. & Ramanujam, V. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1986(11): 801-814
[343] Von Hippel, E. Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading [J]. Research Policy, 1987(16): 291-302
[344] Von Hippel, E. The Sources of Innovation [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988
[345] Von Hippel, E. "Sticky information" and the locus of problem solving [J]. Management Science, 1994(4): 429-439
[346] Weiner, N. & Mahoney, T. A model of corporate performance as a function of environmental, organizational, and leadership influences [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1981(24): 453-470
[347] Wernerfelt, B. A resource-based view of the firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(2): 171-180
[348] Wernerfelt, B. From critical resources to corporate strategy [J]. Journal of General Management, 1989, 14(3): 4-12
[349] Wernerfelt, B. Resource-based strategy in a stochastic model [A]. Montgomery, C. A. Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm [C]. Boston: Kluwer, 1995
[350] Williams, J. Strategy and the search for rents: the evolution of diversity among firms [J]. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, 1992
[351 ] Williamson, O. E. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications [M]. New York: Free Press, 1975
[352] Williamson, O. E. Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange [J]. American Economic Review, 1983(83): 519-540
[353] Williamson, O. E. The economic institutions of capitalism [M]. New York: Free Press, 1985
[354] Williamson, O. E. Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization [A]. Rumelt, R. P., Schendel, D. E. & Teece, D. J. Fundamental Issues in Strategy [C]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994: 361-402
[355] Wright, P., Dunford, B. & Snell, S. Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm [J]. Journal of Management, 2001(6): 701-721
[356] Yin, R. Case study research [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1984
[357] Young, A. Increasing Returns and Economic Progress [J]. Economic Journal, 1928(38): 537-540
[358] Zander, U. & Kogut, B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test [J]. Organizational Science, 1995(6): 76-92
[359] Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. & Brewer, M. B. Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises [J]. American Economic Review, 1998, 88 (1): 290-306
[360] 安虎森．空间接近与不确定性的降低fJ]．南开经济研究，2001(3)：51-56
[361] 蔡宁，吴结兵．企业集群的竞争优势：资源的结构性整合．中国工业经济，2002(7)：45-50
[362] 耿帅．基于共享性资源观的集群企业竞争优势研究[D]．博士学位论文，浙江大学，2004：43-63
[363] 《海宁市志》编纂委员会．海宁市志[M]．上海：汉语大词典出版社，1995：191-194
[364] 金祥荣，柯荣住．对专业市场的一种交易费用经济学解释[J]．经济研究，1997(4)：74-79
[365] 李怀祖．管理研究方法论[M]．西安：西安交通大学出版社，2004：89-101
[366] 迈克尔·波特．国家竞争优势[M]．北京：华夏出版社，2002：116-132
[367] 仇保兴．小企业集群研究[M]．上海：复旦大学出版社，1999：26-33
[368] 王缉慈，童昕．简论我国地方企业集群的研究意义[J]．经济地理，2001(5)：550-553
[369] 韦伯．工业区位论(1929年版)[M]．北京：商务印书馆，1997：25-36
[370] 魏后凯．对产业集群与竞争力的考察[J]．经济管理，2003(6)：4-11
[371] 魏江．产业集群—创新系统与技术学习[M]．北京：科学出版社，2003：15-21
[372] 吴晓波，耿帅，徐松屹．基于共享性资源的集群企业竞争优势分析[J]．研究与发展管理，2004(4)：1-7
[373] 吴晓波，耿帅．区域集群自稔性风险成因分析[J]．经济地理，2003(6)：726-730
[374] 谢洪明，刘常勇，陈春辉．市场导向与组织绩效的关系：组织学习与创新的影响[J]．管理世界，2006(2)：80-94
[375] 叶康涛．案例研究：从个案分析到理论创建[J]．管理世界，2006(2)：139-143
[376] 约瑟夫·熊彼特．经济发展理论[M]．北京：商务印书馆，1990：1-15