高新技术业代工合作中知识转移运行机制与效率研究
|
摘要
代工是后进国家企业参与国际分工的一种重要途径。从价值链在全球分离的状况来看,先进企业逐渐将生产制造等低附加价值的环节剥离,而专注于研发、管理、财务、营销等具有相对竞争优势的核心业务,这一过程为后进企业从一些低附加价值环节入手而嵌入全球价值链、获取新的知识提供了有利的机会。高新技术行业代工模式发展比较成熟,且较之于纺织、服装等传统行业,知识更新频繁,知识外溢和知识转移也更易于发生:拥有知识优势的先进企业出于改进生产灵活性、缩短开发周期、获取专业化外部能力、开辟新的战略市场等方面的考虑,在权衡代工合作收益与可能的知识外溢风险的基础上,有动力进行一定程度的知识转移;而由于代工进入门槛低,合作双方容易形成密切的联系,承接代工的企业也可以在与先进企业的紧密合作中有效获取有关制造、设计等方面的知识,考察韩国、台湾等国家及地区电子信息产业中代工企业的成长历程,可以了解后进企业通过代工模式获取知识转移的可能性和有效性。而对于国内高新技术行业众多承接代工的企业而言,这些来自邻邦的成功经验能否复制?是否能够通过代工有效获取知识?代工合作中知识转移的运行机制是什么?什么因素会影响到高新技术业代工合作中知识转移的效率?各因素的影响力如何?更进一步,考虑到国内高新技术业企业参与代工的实际,应该从什么方面着手加强知识管理,更好的获取知识转移?这是国内高新技术行业的企业通过承接代工以促进自身知识积累的关键问题,也是本研究致力解决的基本问题。
本研究基于知识管理理论、战略管理理论,采取理论与实践相结合、定性与定量相结合的方法,对于高新技术业代工合作中知识转移的动因、知识转移运行机制、知识转移效率等问题进行了深入研究,本研究的主要内容包括:
1、围绕高新技术业代工合作中是.否.存.在.知.识.转.移.的问题,展开知识转移动因的研究;
首先从知识移出方的角度进行分析,指出代工合作是高新技术业先进企业全球战略的一部分,在权衡代工合作中知识转移的合作收益与关键知识被模仿和替代风险的基础上,先进企业有动力进行一定程度的知识转移;
其次从知识接收方的角度进行分析,在考察韩国、台湾高新技术业代工企业知识获取及能力提升的基础上,分析了后进企业通过代工获取知识转移的可能性;在与合资、对外直接投资等模式相比较的基础上,分析了后进企业通过代工获取知识转移的有效性。
另外通过建立三阶段博弈模型,确定了在何种条件下代工合作双方存在转移知识的动力。
2、围绕高新技术业代工合作中知.识.如.何.转.移.的问题,展开知识转移运行机制的研究;
首先进行了知识转移运行机制的界定,重点考察知识转移过程中各因素之间相互联系、相互作用的关系及对于知识转移过程所产生的效应;
知识转移运行机制作为一种动态的系统,其整体功能的发挥主要是通过机制各构成要素的内在联系和作用方式在运行过程中表现出来,其构成要素包括运作环境、运作主体、运作客体、运作目的、运作手段(渠道)等方面;对于高新技术业代工合作中知识转移运行机制的研究,主要从两个层面来进行:一是研究知识转移运行系统与环境作用的一般机制,二是研究知识转移运行系统内部要素之间的作用机制。
3、围绕高新技术业代工合作中知.识.转.移.情.况.如.何.的问题,展开知识转移效率的理论及实证研究;
确定知识特性、知识来源方特性、知识接收方特性、转移渠道、情境因素为影响知识转移效率影响因素的基本因素,并就各种因素对于知识转移效率的影响展开了具体分析;
确定了知识转移效率的测量方式,在回顾既有测量方式的基础上,提出从知识转移结果方面以及从知识转移的过程方面来综合衡量知识转移效率,其中知识转移结果方面考察知识接收方对于转移而来的知识的拥有程度、运用程度及满意程度,知识转移过程方面考察知识转移过程的顺畅程度。
将结构方程分析方法引入到高新技术业代工合作中知识转移效率的研究中,建立了包含160个变量的总体结构模型,结合实证调研数据,展开知识转移效率的实证研究。研究发现知识接收方特性是影响知识转移效率的最为关键的因素,这一结论对于国内高新技术业参与代工的企业而言具有非常重要的启示:明确学习意图、完善知识基础、增强吸收能力方是促进自己更好的获取转移知识的关键。
本研究最终得出以下主要结论:
1、有效获取先进企业的知识转移是高新技术业承接代工的企业从价值链低端升级的基本机制,先进企业在权衡代工合作收益与风险的基础上,有动力进行知识转移,而后进企业通过参与代工导入知识是一种可能、有效的途径;
2、知识转移运行机制作为一种动态系统,其整体功能的发挥主要是通过机制各构成要素的内在联系和作用方式在运行过程中表现出来;对于高新技术业代工合作中知识转移运行机制的研究,可以分两个层面进行:一是研究知识转移运行系统与环境作用的一般机制,二是研究知识转移运行系统内部要素之间的作用机制。
3、知识特性、知识来源方特性、知识接收方特性、转移渠道、情境因素是影响高新技术业代工合作中知识转移效率影响因素的基本因素;知识转移效率的测量可以综合知识转移结果以及知识转移过程两个方面来进行;
4、对于高新技术业代工合作中知识转移效率的实证研究可以引入结构方程分析方法,以综合考虑各种影响因素之间的相互作用。实证研究结果显示:知识接收方特性是影响知识转移效率最为关键的因素;知识转移渠道的直接影响作用较弱,但其所发挥的中介作用却得到了数据的部分支持;情境因素对于知识特性、知识来源方特性以及知识接收方特性作用的发挥起着显著的支持作用。
5、理论及实证研究结论对于国内众多参与代工的企业存在许多有价值的启示:要充分利用全球生产网络的形成所带来的机遇,积极通过代工合作获取可能的知识转移,但同时也要认识到先进企业的知识移出是建立在收益风险权衡基础上的理性决策,唯有明确学习意图、完善自身知识基础、增强吸收能力方是促进自己更好的获取知识转移的关键所在。
本研究的创新主要体现在以下三个方面:
1、系统分析了高新技术业代工合作中知识转移的动因,建立三阶段博弈模型,确定了代工合作双方在何种条件下存在转移知识的动力;
2、界定了知识转移运行机制的内涵,从知识转移运行系统与环境作用的一般机制以及知识转移运行系统内部要素之间的作用机制两个层面展开了高新技术业代工合作中知识转移运行机制的研究,以深入了解高新技术业代工合作知识转移过程中各因素之间相互联系、相互作用的关系以及所产生的效应;
3、将结构方程分析方法引入到高新技术业代工合作中知识转移效率的研究中,建立了包含160个变量的总体结构模型,结合实证调研数据,确定了影响知识转移效率的关键因素,检验了相关理论假设的数据支持情况,并得出了对于国内代工企业有效开展知识管理有价值的启示。
Subcontracting is an important approach for enterprises in developing countries to participate in global division. From the condition of value chain globally separation, advanced enterprises have the trend to delaminate low value added parts such as producing and manufacturing, and concentrate on core businesses such as R&D, management, financial, marketing which can bring comparative advantage for them. This process provides new opportunity and condition for advancing enterprises to gain new knowledge by embedding in global value chain starting from the low value added parts. Subcontracting mode has developed quite mature in high technology industry, and comparing to textile and clothing industry, the knowledge renew is more frequent, knowledge outflow and knowledge transfer is more easier in high technology industry. On the base of weighing subcontracting cooperation benefits and knowledge outflow risks Advancing enterprises enjoyed knowledge advantages have motivation to make a certain degree of knowledge transfer on considering improving manufacturing flexibility, shortening exploration cycle, gaining specialized capability and exploring new strategic market. The subcontracting enterprises can efficiently gain manufacturing and designing knowledge in the process of tightly cooperation with advanced enterprises. On investigating subcontracting enterprise’s growth in Korea and Taiwan, we can acknowledge the possibility and efficiency of advancing enterprises to gain knowledge transfer under subcontracting cooperation. As to domestic subcontracting enterprises in high and technology industry, whether these successful experiences can be copied? Whether they can gain efficient knowledge transfer? What is the operating mechanism of knowledge transfer in subcontracting cooperation? Which factors can have influence on knowledge transfer efficiency? How is the degree of these influences? And further, on considering the practical conditions of domestic subcontracting enterprises in high technology industry, from which aspects do they can strengthen knowledge management to gain knowledge transfer better? Those are key problems for domestic subcontracting enterprises in high and technology industry to promote knowledge accumulation, and also are the basic problems that this thesis engaged to tackle with.
Based on theory of knowledge management and strategic management, and combing theoretical and practical research method, qualifying and quantifying method, this thesis makes deep research on knowledge transfer motivation, knowledge transfer operating mechanism, knowledge transfer efficiency in subcontracting cooperation。The contents of this thesis mainly include:
Firstly, this thesis researches on the motivation of knowledge transfer around the problem whether there is knowledge transfer in high technology industry subcontracting cooperation. At first, this thesis point out that subcontracting cooperation is a part of advanced enterprises global strategy from the aspect of knowledge sourcing. Advanced enterprises have motivation to make knowledge transfer on the basis of weighing subcontracting cooperation benefits and risks. Then this thesis analysis the possibility and efficiency for advancing enterprises to gain knowledge transfer, on the basis of investigating into the subcontracting enterprises’ capability advancement in Korea and Taiwan, and on comparing with other knowledge transfer mode such as joint venture and FDI. At last, this thesis build three stages game model to analyze on what conditions they would have the motivation to make knowledge transfer.
Secondly, this thesis researches on knowledge transfer operating mechanism around the problem how knowledge has been transferred in high technology industry subcontracting cooperation. At first, this thesis clarify the meaning of knowledge transfer operating mechanism, pay attention to the relationship and affects among different factors during the process of knowledge transfer. As a mobile system, the function of knowledge transfer operating mechanism mainly reflect from the inner relationship and affects, it includes operating environment, operating objects, operating aim, operating channel etc. As to the knowledge transfer operating mechanism of high technology industry, this thesis researches from two aspects: one is to research the common mechanism between operating system and environment, the other is to research the affecting mechanism among inner factors of knowledge transfer operating system.
Thirdly, this thesis researches on the knowledge transfer efficiency theoretically and practically around the problem of how the knowledge is transferred. This thesis firstly establishes knowledge characteristics, knowledge sourcing characteristics, knowledge recipient characteristics, knowledge transfer channel and context are basic factors influencing knowledge transfer efficiency, then make concrete analysis toward the affects of different factors. Then this thesis establishes the method to measure knowledge transfer efficiency from the aspects of knowledge transfer outcome and process, the outcome of knowledge transfer manifests on the aspects of recipients’owned and usage of knowledge, the degree of satisfaction toward knowledge transfer, the process of knowledge transfer manifests on the aspect of the degree of smooth transferring.
On the basis of the above research, this thesis draws structural equation analysis method into the empirical research of knowledge transfer efficiency. Combining with the date of questionnaire, this thesis establishes structural equation model including 160 variables. This thesis concludes that among which knowledge recipient characteristics has the most remarkable influence, this conclusion has very important enlightenment for domestic subcontracting enterprises, the key factors for subcontracting enterprises to gain better knowledge transfer lie on definitude learning intention, improving knowledge basis and strengthening absorptive capability. This thesis ultimately draws the following conclusions:
Firstly, gaining advanced enterprises’knowledge transfer efficiently is the basic mechanism for domestic subcontracting enterprises in high technology industry to advance from lower stage in global value chain, advanced enterprises have motivation to make knowledge transfer on weighing the subcontracting cooperation benefits and risks, while advancing enterprises gaining knowledge transfer through subcontracting is an possible and efficient approach.
Secondly, knowledge transfer operating mechanism is a mobile system, the function of knowledge transfer operating mechanism mainly reflects from the inner relationship and affects. As to the knowledge transfer operating mechanism of high technology industry, this thesis researches from two aspects: one is to research the common mechanism between operating system and environment, the other is to research the affecting mechanism among inner factors of knowledge transfer operating system.
Thirdly, knowledge characteristics, knowledge sourcing characteristics, knowledge recipient characteristics, knowledge transfer channel and context are basic factors influencing knowledge transfer efficiency, the measurement of knowledge transfer efficiency can synthesizing knowledge transfer outcome and process. Fourthly, structural equation analysis method can be used in the empirical research of knowledge transfer efficiency on considering the mutual relationship among different factors. The outcome of empirical research manifests that knowledge recipient characteristics has the most remarkable influence, the direct influence of knowledge transfer channel is relatively weak, while the channel influence towards them receive the empirical supporting partly. Context has significant supporting faction toward knowledge characteristics, knowledge sourcing characteristics and knowledge recipient characteristics.
Lastly, the conclusion of theoretical and empirical research has very important enlightenment for domestic subcontracting enterprises, they should grasp the opportunity of global production networks and gaining knowledge from subcontracting cooperation as much as possible, but at the same time, they should realize that as to advanced enterprises, knowledge transfer is a rationale strategy comparing cooperation benefits and risks, the key factors for subcontracting enterprises to gain better knowledge transfer lie on definitude learning intention, improving knowledge basis and strengthening absorptive capability.
The innovation of this thesis reflects on the following aspects:
Firstly, this thesis analyzes the motivation of knowledge transfer systematically, and established three stages game model to analyze the condition of knowledge transfer during subcontracting cooperation;
Secondly, this thesis clarifies the meaning of knowledge transfer operating mechanism, and makes research from two aspects: one is the common mechanism between knowledge transfer operating mechanism and environment, the other is the mutual influencing mechanism among the inner factors of knowledge transfer operating system, to acknowledge the mutual relationship and influences and the corresponding affects;
Thirdly, this thesis draws structural equation analysis method into the empirical research of knowledge transfer efficiency in high technology industry, and establishes the whole structural model including 160 variables. Combing with the empirical investigation, this thesis establishes the crucial factors as to knowledge transfer efficiency, and testing the date supporting conditions of relevant theoretical hypothesis, then draws instructive conclusions for domestic subcontracting enterprises to make efficient knowledge management.
本研究基于知识管理理论、战略管理理论,采取理论与实践相结合、定性与定量相结合的方法,对于高新技术业代工合作中知识转移的动因、知识转移运行机制、知识转移效率等问题进行了深入研究,本研究的主要内容包括:
1、围绕高新技术业代工合作中是.否.存.在.知.识.转.移.的问题,展开知识转移动因的研究;
首先从知识移出方的角度进行分析,指出代工合作是高新技术业先进企业全球战略的一部分,在权衡代工合作中知识转移的合作收益与关键知识被模仿和替代风险的基础上,先进企业有动力进行一定程度的知识转移;
其次从知识接收方的角度进行分析,在考察韩国、台湾高新技术业代工企业知识获取及能力提升的基础上,分析了后进企业通过代工获取知识转移的可能性;在与合资、对外直接投资等模式相比较的基础上,分析了后进企业通过代工获取知识转移的有效性。
另外通过建立三阶段博弈模型,确定了在何种条件下代工合作双方存在转移知识的动力。
2、围绕高新技术业代工合作中知.识.如.何.转.移.的问题,展开知识转移运行机制的研究;
首先进行了知识转移运行机制的界定,重点考察知识转移过程中各因素之间相互联系、相互作用的关系及对于知识转移过程所产生的效应;
知识转移运行机制作为一种动态的系统,其整体功能的发挥主要是通过机制各构成要素的内在联系和作用方式在运行过程中表现出来,其构成要素包括运作环境、运作主体、运作客体、运作目的、运作手段(渠道)等方面;对于高新技术业代工合作中知识转移运行机制的研究,主要从两个层面来进行:一是研究知识转移运行系统与环境作用的一般机制,二是研究知识转移运行系统内部要素之间的作用机制。
3、围绕高新技术业代工合作中知.识.转.移.情.况.如.何.的问题,展开知识转移效率的理论及实证研究;
确定知识特性、知识来源方特性、知识接收方特性、转移渠道、情境因素为影响知识转移效率影响因素的基本因素,并就各种因素对于知识转移效率的影响展开了具体分析;
确定了知识转移效率的测量方式,在回顾既有测量方式的基础上,提出从知识转移结果方面以及从知识转移的过程方面来综合衡量知识转移效率,其中知识转移结果方面考察知识接收方对于转移而来的知识的拥有程度、运用程度及满意程度,知识转移过程方面考察知识转移过程的顺畅程度。
将结构方程分析方法引入到高新技术业代工合作中知识转移效率的研究中,建立了包含160个变量的总体结构模型,结合实证调研数据,展开知识转移效率的实证研究。研究发现知识接收方特性是影响知识转移效率的最为关键的因素,这一结论对于国内高新技术业参与代工的企业而言具有非常重要的启示:明确学习意图、完善知识基础、增强吸收能力方是促进自己更好的获取转移知识的关键。
本研究最终得出以下主要结论:
1、有效获取先进企业的知识转移是高新技术业承接代工的企业从价值链低端升级的基本机制,先进企业在权衡代工合作收益与风险的基础上,有动力进行知识转移,而后进企业通过参与代工导入知识是一种可能、有效的途径;
2、知识转移运行机制作为一种动态系统,其整体功能的发挥主要是通过机制各构成要素的内在联系和作用方式在运行过程中表现出来;对于高新技术业代工合作中知识转移运行机制的研究,可以分两个层面进行:一是研究知识转移运行系统与环境作用的一般机制,二是研究知识转移运行系统内部要素之间的作用机制。
3、知识特性、知识来源方特性、知识接收方特性、转移渠道、情境因素是影响高新技术业代工合作中知识转移效率影响因素的基本因素;知识转移效率的测量可以综合知识转移结果以及知识转移过程两个方面来进行;
4、对于高新技术业代工合作中知识转移效率的实证研究可以引入结构方程分析方法,以综合考虑各种影响因素之间的相互作用。实证研究结果显示:知识接收方特性是影响知识转移效率最为关键的因素;知识转移渠道的直接影响作用较弱,但其所发挥的中介作用却得到了数据的部分支持;情境因素对于知识特性、知识来源方特性以及知识接收方特性作用的发挥起着显著的支持作用。
5、理论及实证研究结论对于国内众多参与代工的企业存在许多有价值的启示:要充分利用全球生产网络的形成所带来的机遇,积极通过代工合作获取可能的知识转移,但同时也要认识到先进企业的知识移出是建立在收益风险权衡基础上的理性决策,唯有明确学习意图、完善自身知识基础、增强吸收能力方是促进自己更好的获取知识转移的关键所在。
本研究的创新主要体现在以下三个方面:
1、系统分析了高新技术业代工合作中知识转移的动因,建立三阶段博弈模型,确定了代工合作双方在何种条件下存在转移知识的动力;
2、界定了知识转移运行机制的内涵,从知识转移运行系统与环境作用的一般机制以及知识转移运行系统内部要素之间的作用机制两个层面展开了高新技术业代工合作中知识转移运行机制的研究,以深入了解高新技术业代工合作知识转移过程中各因素之间相互联系、相互作用的关系以及所产生的效应;
3、将结构方程分析方法引入到高新技术业代工合作中知识转移效率的研究中,建立了包含160个变量的总体结构模型,结合实证调研数据,确定了影响知识转移效率的关键因素,检验了相关理论假设的数据支持情况,并得出了对于国内代工企业有效开展知识管理有价值的启示。
Subcontracting is an important approach for enterprises in developing countries to participate in global division. From the condition of value chain globally separation, advanced enterprises have the trend to delaminate low value added parts such as producing and manufacturing, and concentrate on core businesses such as R&D, management, financial, marketing which can bring comparative advantage for them. This process provides new opportunity and condition for advancing enterprises to gain new knowledge by embedding in global value chain starting from the low value added parts. Subcontracting mode has developed quite mature in high technology industry, and comparing to textile and clothing industry, the knowledge renew is more frequent, knowledge outflow and knowledge transfer is more easier in high technology industry. On the base of weighing subcontracting cooperation benefits and knowledge outflow risks Advancing enterprises enjoyed knowledge advantages have motivation to make a certain degree of knowledge transfer on considering improving manufacturing flexibility, shortening exploration cycle, gaining specialized capability and exploring new strategic market. The subcontracting enterprises can efficiently gain manufacturing and designing knowledge in the process of tightly cooperation with advanced enterprises. On investigating subcontracting enterprise’s growth in Korea and Taiwan, we can acknowledge the possibility and efficiency of advancing enterprises to gain knowledge transfer under subcontracting cooperation. As to domestic subcontracting enterprises in high and technology industry, whether these successful experiences can be copied? Whether they can gain efficient knowledge transfer? What is the operating mechanism of knowledge transfer in subcontracting cooperation? Which factors can have influence on knowledge transfer efficiency? How is the degree of these influences? And further, on considering the practical conditions of domestic subcontracting enterprises in high technology industry, from which aspects do they can strengthen knowledge management to gain knowledge transfer better? Those are key problems for domestic subcontracting enterprises in high and technology industry to promote knowledge accumulation, and also are the basic problems that this thesis engaged to tackle with.
Based on theory of knowledge management and strategic management, and combing theoretical and practical research method, qualifying and quantifying method, this thesis makes deep research on knowledge transfer motivation, knowledge transfer operating mechanism, knowledge transfer efficiency in subcontracting cooperation。The contents of this thesis mainly include:
Firstly, this thesis researches on the motivation of knowledge transfer around the problem whether there is knowledge transfer in high technology industry subcontracting cooperation. At first, this thesis point out that subcontracting cooperation is a part of advanced enterprises global strategy from the aspect of knowledge sourcing. Advanced enterprises have motivation to make knowledge transfer on the basis of weighing subcontracting cooperation benefits and risks. Then this thesis analysis the possibility and efficiency for advancing enterprises to gain knowledge transfer, on the basis of investigating into the subcontracting enterprises’ capability advancement in Korea and Taiwan, and on comparing with other knowledge transfer mode such as joint venture and FDI. At last, this thesis build three stages game model to analyze on what conditions they would have the motivation to make knowledge transfer.
Secondly, this thesis researches on knowledge transfer operating mechanism around the problem how knowledge has been transferred in high technology industry subcontracting cooperation. At first, this thesis clarify the meaning of knowledge transfer operating mechanism, pay attention to the relationship and affects among different factors during the process of knowledge transfer. As a mobile system, the function of knowledge transfer operating mechanism mainly reflect from the inner relationship and affects, it includes operating environment, operating objects, operating aim, operating channel etc. As to the knowledge transfer operating mechanism of high technology industry, this thesis researches from two aspects: one is to research the common mechanism between operating system and environment, the other is to research the affecting mechanism among inner factors of knowledge transfer operating system.
Thirdly, this thesis researches on the knowledge transfer efficiency theoretically and practically around the problem of how the knowledge is transferred. This thesis firstly establishes knowledge characteristics, knowledge sourcing characteristics, knowledge recipient characteristics, knowledge transfer channel and context are basic factors influencing knowledge transfer efficiency, then make concrete analysis toward the affects of different factors. Then this thesis establishes the method to measure knowledge transfer efficiency from the aspects of knowledge transfer outcome and process, the outcome of knowledge transfer manifests on the aspects of recipients’owned and usage of knowledge, the degree of satisfaction toward knowledge transfer, the process of knowledge transfer manifests on the aspect of the degree of smooth transferring.
On the basis of the above research, this thesis draws structural equation analysis method into the empirical research of knowledge transfer efficiency. Combining with the date of questionnaire, this thesis establishes structural equation model including 160 variables. This thesis concludes that among which knowledge recipient characteristics has the most remarkable influence, this conclusion has very important enlightenment for domestic subcontracting enterprises, the key factors for subcontracting enterprises to gain better knowledge transfer lie on definitude learning intention, improving knowledge basis and strengthening absorptive capability. This thesis ultimately draws the following conclusions:
Firstly, gaining advanced enterprises’knowledge transfer efficiently is the basic mechanism for domestic subcontracting enterprises in high technology industry to advance from lower stage in global value chain, advanced enterprises have motivation to make knowledge transfer on weighing the subcontracting cooperation benefits and risks, while advancing enterprises gaining knowledge transfer through subcontracting is an possible and efficient approach.
Secondly, knowledge transfer operating mechanism is a mobile system, the function of knowledge transfer operating mechanism mainly reflects from the inner relationship and affects. As to the knowledge transfer operating mechanism of high technology industry, this thesis researches from two aspects: one is to research the common mechanism between operating system and environment, the other is to research the affecting mechanism among inner factors of knowledge transfer operating system.
Thirdly, knowledge characteristics, knowledge sourcing characteristics, knowledge recipient characteristics, knowledge transfer channel and context are basic factors influencing knowledge transfer efficiency, the measurement of knowledge transfer efficiency can synthesizing knowledge transfer outcome and process. Fourthly, structural equation analysis method can be used in the empirical research of knowledge transfer efficiency on considering the mutual relationship among different factors. The outcome of empirical research manifests that knowledge recipient characteristics has the most remarkable influence, the direct influence of knowledge transfer channel is relatively weak, while the channel influence towards them receive the empirical supporting partly. Context has significant supporting faction toward knowledge characteristics, knowledge sourcing characteristics and knowledge recipient characteristics.
Lastly, the conclusion of theoretical and empirical research has very important enlightenment for domestic subcontracting enterprises, they should grasp the opportunity of global production networks and gaining knowledge from subcontracting cooperation as much as possible, but at the same time, they should realize that as to advanced enterprises, knowledge transfer is a rationale strategy comparing cooperation benefits and risks, the key factors for subcontracting enterprises to gain better knowledge transfer lie on definitude learning intention, improving knowledge basis and strengthening absorptive capability.
The innovation of this thesis reflects on the following aspects:
Firstly, this thesis analyzes the motivation of knowledge transfer systematically, and established three stages game model to analyze the condition of knowledge transfer during subcontracting cooperation;
Secondly, this thesis clarifies the meaning of knowledge transfer operating mechanism, and makes research from two aspects: one is the common mechanism between knowledge transfer operating mechanism and environment, the other is the mutual influencing mechanism among the inner factors of knowledge transfer operating system, to acknowledge the mutual relationship and influences and the corresponding affects;
Thirdly, this thesis draws structural equation analysis method into the empirical research of knowledge transfer efficiency in high technology industry, and establishes the whole structural model including 160 variables. Combing with the empirical investigation, this thesis establishes the crucial factors as to knowledge transfer efficiency, and testing the date supporting conditions of relevant theoretical hypothesis, then draws instructive conclusions for domestic subcontracting enterprises to make efficient knowledge management.
引文
1、 卜国琴,张耀辉.全球生产网络视角下的侨资加工贸易技术模仿创新特征研究-以台湾宝成集团制鞋业代工为例[J].特区经济,2005(10)
2、 蔡声霞.技术知识、组织学习与发展中国家的技术转移对策 [J].环渤海经济瞭望,2003(12)
3、 陈颖.我国纺织服装企业国际化经营中的贴牌战略[J].上海纺织科技,2003(3)
4、 陈振祥.ODM 策略之理论架构与实证 [D].台湾:国立台湾大学,民 85.
5、 葛京.企业国际化过程中的知识转移与组织学习[J].中国软科学,2002(1)
6、 龚毅、谢恩.中外企业战略联盟知识转移效率的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2005(4)
7、 关涛.跨国公司内部知识转移过程与影响因素的实证研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2005
8、 韩宇.知识转移及其分析方法研究 [D].天津:天津大学,2004
9、 韩中和.从贴牌生产到创建国际品牌[J].国际商务研究,2003(2)
10、 何俊.中国企业国际化的战略选择及模式研究[J].前沿,2006(4)
11、 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟著,结构方程模型及其应用,北京:教育科学出版社,2004
12、 黄燕,冯禹丁.代工企业的品牌冲动[J].互联网周刊,2003(30)
13、 江霈、王述英. 外包生产模式及其对市场结构影响的分析[J].中国工业经济,2005(6)
14、 李伟.隐性知识转移机制的研究[J].情报杂志,2005(4)
15、 李逸宁.自有品牌与代工品牌之竞合关系[D].台湾:东海大学,民 94
16、 卢锋 . 产品内分工:一个分析框架 [Z]. 北大中国经济研究中心中文讨论稿,No.C2004005。
17、 林莉.基于 U/I 知识联盟的知识转移研究 [D].辽宁:大连理工大学,2004
18、 刘丽萍.知识转移过程的运行机制与隐性知识转移机理研究[J].哲学动态,2004(9)
19、 刘亮亮,王正斌.代工企业在跨国生产外包中的决策模型及风险因素分析[J].西安邮电学院学报,2005(2)
20、 刘志彪.中国沿海地区制造业发展:国际代工合作模式与创新[J].南开经济研究,2005(5)
21、 马超.诠释 OEM、ODM 和 OBM[J].电子质量,2003(2)
22、 迈克尔·波特.竞争战略[M].华夏出版社,2005
23、 裴珍珍,全球制造网络中知识转移影响因素研究,浙江大学,2006 年 4 月 硕士论文
24、 彭佳.虚拟企业的知识转移问题研究[D].辽宁:东北大学,2005
25、 秦仪,罗霄.论企业跨国经营中的知识管理[J].中国软科学,2002(6)
26、 任辉.基于网络视角的跨国公司知识转移机制研究[J].技术经济,2005(8)
27、 任荣.企业知识转移效果的评价[J].科技情报开发与经济,2005(4)
28、 施振荣.再造宏碁:开创、成长与挑战.[Z].中信出版社,2005 年第一版。
29、 孙扬澄.跨国公司生产外包战略及其管理研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2003
30、 王开明.试论知识的转移与扩散[J].外国经济与管理,2000(10)
31、 王来武.试论知识产品国际转移的动因及其经济效应[J].外向经济,1999(Z1)
32、 汪应洛.知识的转移特性研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002(10)
33、 王伟、黄瑞华.知识转移的效率:知识特性和内部知识市场的影响[J].科学学与科技技术管理,2006(3)
34、 肖小勇.基于企业网络的组织间知识转移研究[D].中南大学,2005,博士
35、 肖学芳.企业跨国经营中的贴牌战略[J]. 中外管理导报,2002(2)
36、 许强.基于知识转移的母子公司关系管理研究 [D].浙江:浙江大学,2003
37、 徐婉萍.自有品牌开发对客户权益的影响分析-以电脑代工业为例[D].台湾:东吴大学,民 93
38、 杨洋.企业代工动机、种类、强度与企业绩效的关系研究 [D].浙江:浙江大学,2005。
39、 于鹏、曲明军.跨国公司内部知识转移机制研究[J].山东社会科学,2006(3)
40、 张殿文.虎与狐——台湾首富郭台铭经营之道揭密[M].汕头大学出版社,2005
41、 张莉.知识转移的影响因素及转移过程研究[J].情报科学,2005(11)
42、 张凯程.供应链下 OEM、ODM 契约之研究[D].台湾:世新大学,民 95
43、 赵文丁.新型国际分工格局下中国制造业的比较优势[J]. 中国工业经济,2003(8)
44、 赵雪锋.IT 项目中隐性知识转移方法的选择及转移绩效的衡量[J].经济论坛,2005(18)
45、 郑文胜.代工之路还可以走多元?[J].引进与决策,2005(5)
46、 钟国节. 做自有品牌还是做专业代工——GDS 业务模式选择的分析与思考 [D].上海:复旦大学,2003
47、 周晓东.企业知识内部转移:模式、影响因素与机制分析[J].南开管理评论,2003(5)
48、 朱方伟.技术转移中隐性知识转化的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(11)
49、 卓秋季.代工合作模式与创新关联之研究 [D].台湾:国立政治大学,民 86.
50、 Ai-Ting Goh and Henry Y. Wan, Jr. Fragmentation, Engel’s Law and Learning[J].Review of International Economics, 13(3), 518-528, 2005.
51、 Almedia, P. and Grant, L. International corporations and Cross-border knowledge transfer in the Semiconductor industry. Available: http://cbi.gaa.cmu.dee/newwebl/1998/working pgent/Almedia.btml.
52、 A.K.Yeung, D.O.Ulrich, S.W.Nason, M.A.Von Glinow. Organizational Learning Capacity: Generating Ideas with Impact. Oxford University Press, 1999.117-159
53、 Appleyard. How does knowledge flow? Inter-firm patterns in the semiconductor industry, Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(Winter special issue):137-154.
54、 Argote,L.,Ingram,P. Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2000,82(1):150- 169
55、 Atamturk, Alper; Hochbaum, Dorit S. Capacity Acquisition, Subcontracting, and Lot Sizing. Management Science, Aug2001, Vol. 47 Issue 8, p1081.
56、 Barney J., 1991, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal Of Management, (17):99 -120.
57、 Bartle, M Christopher A.; Ghoshal, Sumantra. Managing across Border: New Strategic Requirement. Sloan Management Review, VoC28, Issue 4, Summer 1987.
58、 Baughn, Denekamp, Stevens, & Osborn. Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances. Journal of World Business, 1997, Vol.32, pp.103–117
59、 Beckman, T.J. The current state of knowledge manangement.In Leibowtiz, J. (ed.), Knowledge Management Handbook. Boca: CRC Press, 1999, 1-22.
60、 Bernard L Simonin. An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, Volume
35, Number 5, September 2004, pp. 407-427(21).
61、 Berry, T.W. 1983. Acculturation: A comparative analysis of alternative forms. In R.J. Samuda & S.L. Woods, editors, Perspectives in immigrant and minority education. Lanham: University Press of America.
62、 Bertrand, J.W.M.; Sridharan, V.A study of simple rules for subcontracting in make-to-order manufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 02/01/2001, Vol. 128 Issue 3, p509-531
63、 B.L. Jr. Badaracco. Alliances speed knowledge transfer. Planning Review, 1991 (19):10-16.
64、 B.L.Simonin, Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999(9): 595-623.
65、 B.Kogut, U.Zander. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 1993(4): 625-643.
66、 Boomsma A.Nonconvergence, improper solutions and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 1982, 50: 229-242.
67、 Bresman, Henrik; Birkinshaw, Julian; Nobel, Robert. Knowledge Transfer in International Acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 1999 3rd Quarter, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p439-462.
68、 Br?chner, Jan; Rosander, Sara; Waara, Fredrik. Cross-border post-acquisition knowledge transfer among construction consultants. Construction Management and Economics , 22 (4) pp. 421-427
69、 Brodsky, Subcontracting Made Easy. Norm. Inc., Feb2005, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p47-48
70、 Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr., A Paradigam for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, Feb, 1979, 16:64-73.
71、 Clayton & Wellington. Use of formal and informal control mechanisms in international joint venture: Australian and Indian joint venture partnerships. 2002, Competitive paper for IMP conference Dijon.
72、 Coase Ronald. The nature ofthe firm. 1937, Economica 4, 386-405.
73、 Coe, David, Alexander Hoffmaister, and Elhanan Helpman. North-South R&D Spillovers. Economic Journal, 1997, 107, 440: 134-149.
74、 Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L.Working Knowledge: How Organizations to manage what they know [M]. Harvard Business School Press. 1998.
75、 David Y.F.L., Joo E.Lee-Partridge, Exploring Knowledge Management Perceptions among Information Systems Managers-Emprical Sense-Making through Focus Group Research, Australian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 2001: 42-55.
76、 Davidson, W.H. 1983. Structure and performance in international technology transfer. Journal of Management Studies, 20(4): 453-466.
77、 Deardorff, Alan; Djankov, Simeon. Knowledge Transfer under Subcontracting: Evidence from Czech Firms. World Development, Oct2000, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p1837
78、 Devapriya, K.A.K.; Ganesan, S. Technology transfer subcontracting in developing countries through. Building Research & Information, May2002, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p171-182.
79、 Dinur & Inkpen et al, Knowledge transfer in the multinational corporations. Paperpresented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of International business, Vienna, Austria, 1998.
80、 Dixon N.M.Common knowledge: how companies thrive by sharing what they know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2000
81、 Dretske F. Knowledge and Flow of Information, Cambridge (Mass.): 1981, MIT Press.
82、 Drucker, P. The coming of the new organisation Harvard Business Review, 1988, 66(1), 45-53
83、 Dulbecco, Philippe; Vagneron, Isabelle. Competition, Co-Operation and Subcontracting: Lessons from the Clothing Industry in Thailand. European Journal of Development Research, Dec2001, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p58.
84、 Eric .S. Rebentisch & Marco Ferretti. A knowledge asset-based view of technology transfer in international joint ventures. Journal of engineering and technology management, 1995, 12, 1-25.
85、 Ernst, D. The economics of electronics industry: competitive dynamics and industrial organization. In. Warner, M., Lazonick, W. (Eds)., The International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, International Thomson Business Press, London, In Press. 2002a
86、 Ernst, D.Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation of the economics of innovation and new technologies, 2002b, 12, 1-27.
87、 Ernst D., Linsu Kim. Global production networks, knowledge diffusion and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31, 2002, 1417-1429.
88、 Erol Taymaz-Yilmaz Kilcaslan. Determinants of subcontracting and regional development: an empirical study on Turkish textile and engineering industries. 2nd Revision, July 16, 2004.
89、 Feenstra,Robert C. Integration of trade and disintegration of Production in the Global Economy ,Journal of Economic Perspective ,Vol.12,no.4,1998 Fall,pp.31-50.
90、 Gereffi G.,Humphrey J.,Sturgeon T. The governance ofglobal value chains ,Review of International Political Economy,2005,Vol.12,Issue1,pp.78-104
91、 Ghoshal. S and Nohria.N, Internal differentiation within multinational corporations, Strategic management journal, 1989, Issue 10.
92、 Gonzalez-Diaz, Manuel; Arrunada, Benito. Causes of subcontracting: Evidence from panel data on construction firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Jun2000, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p167.
93、 Gunnarson, Sven, and Levitt, Raymond, E. Is a building a hierarchy or a market?, Proceedings of the 7th Internet Congress, Copenhagen, 1982
94、 Hakanson, Lars 1995. Learning through acquisitions: Management and integration of foreign R&D laboratories. International Studies of Management and Organization, 25 (1-2): 121-158.
95、 Hamel.Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. SMJ, 1991, Vol.12, 83-103
96、 Hamel, G.; Prahalad, C.H. Corporate imagination and expeditionary marketing. Harvard Business Review, J ul/Aug1991, Vol 69.
97、 Hasegawa Harukiyo and Glenn D.Hook Edited.Japanese Business Management: Restructuring for low growth and globalization,Journal of Financial Economics,55,March 2000
98、 Haspeslagh, P. and Jemison, D.B.1991; Managing acquisitions, New York: Free Press
99、 Hayashi, Mitsuhiro. The role of subcontracting in SME development in Indonesia: Micro-level evidence from the metalworking and machinery industry. Journal of Asian Economics, Jan/Feb2002, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1.
100、 Heshmati, A. Productivity Growth, Efficiency and Outsourcing in Manufacturing and Services. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2003, 17(1), 79-112.
101、 Hewitt-Dundas, Nola; Bernadette Andréosso-O'Callaghan; Crone, Mike; Roper, Stephen. Knowledge Transfers from Multinational Plants in Ireland. European Urban & Regional Studies, Jan2005, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p23-43.
102、 Holmes. The organization and localization of production subcontracting i Scott, A. J. & Storper, M. J. (eds.): Production, work, territory. The geographical anatomy of industrial capitalism. 1986,Allen & Unwin, Boston
103、 Hou, C.M. and S. Gee.National systems supporting technical advance in industry: the case of Taiwan. In Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A comparative analysis, New York: Oxford University Press, P 384-413.
104、 Hummels ,D.,Jun Ishii ,Kei-Mu Yi ,2001.The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Journal of International Economics ,54,pp.75-96.
105、 Hymer. S, The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Investment. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press, 1960.
106、 Inkpen. Learning and knowledge acquisition throgh international strategic alliances. Academy of management Executive, 1998, Vol. 12, No.4, PP 69-71
107、 Inkpen, A.C. Creating knowledge through collaboration, California Management Review, 1996, 39(1):123-140.
108、 Inkpen, Andrew. Learning and collaboration: An examination of North American - Japanese Joint Ventures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, 1992.
109、 Jaehwa Lee. Role of Foreign Direct Investment in Knowledge Spillovers: Firm-Level Evidence from Korean Firms’ Patent and Patent Citations, The Journal of the Korean Economy, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Spring 2004), 47-67
110、 J Bontis, N., Crossan, M. and Fulland, J. Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows of knowledge. Journal of Management Studies,20 01.38(forthcoming)
111、 Jensen, Robert; Szulanski, Gabriel. Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies, Nov2004, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p508-523.
112、 Johannessen, Olsen & Olaisen.Aspects of innovation theory based on knowledge-management. International Journal of Information Management, 1999, Vol. 19, pp. 121-139.
113、 Johnstone, B. Taiwan holds its lead, local makers move into new systems, Far Eastern Economic Review, 1989, 31 August, P 50-51.
114、 Joreskog K.G., Sorbom D. Lisrel 7: A guide to the program and application (2nd ed.). Chicago: SPSS, 1988.
115、 Kane, Aimée A.; Argote, Linda; Levine, Job M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, Jan2005, Vol. 96 Issue 1, p56-71.
116、 Karlsen, Jan Terje,Gottschalk, Petter,Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer in IT Projects,Engineering Management Journal; Mar2004, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p3-10, 8p
117、 Kogut, B., Shan, W. & Walker, G. Knowledge in the network and the network as knowledge: the structuring of new industries. G. Grabher (. The Embedded Firm. London: Routledge. 1988, 67-94
118、 Kojima and Ozawa, Towards a theory of industrial restructuring and dynamic comparative advantage, Hitotsubashi journal of economics, 1985, December, volume26, Issue2.
119、 Kojima, K, Direct foreign investment: A Japanese model of multinational business operations. London: Croom Helm, 1978.
120、 Kotabe, Masaaki,Martin, Xavier,Domoto, Hiroshi. Gaining from vertical partnerships: knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries,Strategic managment journal, 2003, Vol24, Issue4, P293-316.
121、 Kwan, M. Millie; Cheung, Pak-Keung. The Knowledge Transfer Process: From Field Studies to Technology Development. Journal of Database Management, Jan-Mar2006, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p16-32.
122、 Law, Y.F.D. and Lee-Partridge, J.E. “Sense-Making of Empirical Knowledge Management Perceptions Through Frames of Reference,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS’2001), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, December 16-19, 2001, 5 pages.
123、 Lihui Lin; Xianjun Geng; Whinston, Andrew B. A Sender receiver Framework for Knowledge Transfer. MIS Quarterly, Jun2005, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p197-219.
124、 Lindgren, U. 1982. Foreign acquisitions: Management of the integration process. Stockholm: Institute of International Business.
125、 Lippman S, Rumelt R.Uncertain imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition.Bell Journal Economics, 1982, 13:418-438.
126、 Mansfield, E. 1985. How rapidly does new industrial technology leakout. Journal of Industrial Economics, 34: 217-223.
127、 Masson, R. M. Strategic information systems: Use of information technology in a learning organization,Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 93.CA: IEEE Press, 1993,P :840 -849.
128、 McDonald R.P, Ho M.R. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psycholgical Methods, 2002, 7:64-82.
129、 M. Hobday. Innovation in East Asia: Diversity and Development. Technovation Volume: 15, Issue: 2, March, 1995, pp. 55-63.
130、 Minbaeva, Dana B.; Michailova, Snejina. Knowledge transfer and expatriation in multinational corporations: The role of disseminative capacity. Employee Relations, 2004, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p663-679.
131、 Miwa, Yoshiro; Ramseyer, J. Mark. Rethinking Relationship-specific Investments: Subcontracting in the Japanese Automobile Industry. Michigan Law Review, Aug2000, Vol. 98 Issue 8, p2636.
132、 M.L.Qunjian, E.B.Came, A study of the factors which affect technology transfer in a multilocation multibusiness unit corporation [J]. IEEE Transactions on EngineeringManagement, 1987(34): 194-201.
133、 Montgomery, David B.; Isobe, Takehiko; Makino, Shige. Cross-Border Knowledge Transfer and Performance in Emerging Economic Regions: the Case of Japanese International Joint Ventures in China. Working Papers (Faculty) -- Stanford Graduate School of Business, 1998, preceding p1-45.
134、 Mowery, David C.; Oxley, Joanne E.; Silverman, Brian S. Strategic Alliances and Inter-firm Knowledge Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, Winter96 Special Issue, Vol. 17, p77-91.
135、 Moore, K.J., A strategy for subsidiaries: centers of excellences to build subsidiary specific advantages. Management International Revie, 2001, 41(3):p275-290.
136、 Muthusamy, Senthil K.; White, Margaret A. Learning and Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances: A Social Exchange View. Organization Studies (Sage Publications Inc.), 2005, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p415-441,
137、 Nelson, R. y Winter, S. 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge (MA), Belknap-. Harvard University Press.
138、 Nevis, E.C.; DiBella, A.J.; and Gould, J.M. "Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems. Sloan Management Review. Vol (36), Winter, 1995, P: 73 -85.
139、 Nonaka. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 1994,Vol.5(1), pp.14-37
140、 Nonaka & Takeuchi. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies create the Dynmics of Innovation. 1995, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
141、 Penrose E.T. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley, 1959.
142、 Peter Biegelbauer, Erich Grie?ler, Margit Leuthold. The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Knowledge Base of Central and Eastern European Countries. Reihe Politikwissenschaft.
143、 Pien Wang; Kulwant Singh; Chun Peng Koh; Wenfeng Tong.Determinants and Outcomes of Knowledge Transfer: A Study of MNCs in China. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2001, pK1, 6p.
144、 Reed & DeFillippi. 1990, “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage.” Academy of Management Review, 15(1), pp.88-102.
145、 Reve, T. and Levitt, R.E. Organisation and governance in construction, Project management, 1984, 2, 17-25.
146、 Rhee, Y., Ross-Larson, B. and Pursell, G.Korea’s competitive edge: managing entry into world markets (1984, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press).
147、 Riusala, Kimmo; Suutari, Vesa. International Knowledge Transfers through Expatriates. Thunderbird International Business Review, Nov/Dec2004, Vol. 46 Issue 6, p743-770.
148、 Rodrik, Dani. 1994. “Industrial Organization and Product Quality: Evidence from South Korean and Taiwanese Exports,” In Paul Krugman and Alisdair Smith, Eds., Empirical Studies of Strategic Trade Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago Press, pp. 195-210.
149、 Se-Hwa Wu & Frederick B.Hsu. Towards a knowledge-based view of OEM relationship building: sharing of industrial experiences in Taiwan. International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.22, No.5, 2001.
150、 Senge, P .M. The leader new work: Building learning organization. Sloan Management Review, 1990(11), P 7-23.
151、 Shrivastava, P. Postmerger integration. Journal of Business Strategy, 1986, 7(1): 65-77.
152、 Simonin, B.L. Transfer of marketing know-how in international strategic alliances: An empirical investigation of the role and antecedents of knowledge ambiguity. Journal of International Business Studies, 1999, 30(3): 463-490.
153、 Stinchombe, A. L. Bureaucratic and Craft Administration of Production: "A Comparative Study. Administrative Science Quarterly 4 (September): 1959, 168-87
154、 Subramanian, A. and Nilakanta, S. Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Journal of International Management, 1996, 24(6):631-647.
155、 S.Zahra, G. George. Absorptive capacity:A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review,2002,Vo1.27,No.2,185～203.
156、 Szulanski. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, Vol.17, winter special, pp.27-43.
157、 Szulanski, Gabriel; Cappetta, Rossella; Jensen, Robert J. When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, Sep/Oct2004, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p600-613.
158、 Taymaz, Erol; Kili?aslan, Yilmaz. Determinants of Subcontracting and Regional Development: An Empirical Study on Turkish Textile and Engineering Industries. Regional Studies, Jul2005, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p633-645.
159、 Teece D.Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982.
160、 Teece. Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1996, 31(2): pp.193-224.
161、 T Hansen, M.T. "The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing know ledge across organizational subunits. Administrative science quarterly, 1999, 44.
162、 Van der Spek R., Spijkervert A., Knowledge Management: Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge, in Liebo
163、 Vernon. R, International investment and international trade in the product cycle, Quartly Journal of Economics, 1966.
164、 Vito Albino, Claudio Garavelli A. Giovanni Schiuma. Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts: The role of the leader firm. Technovation, 1999, 19:53-63.
165、 Walker, A. Project management in construction, 3rd Edn, Blackwell, 1996, Oxford.
166、 Walker, A. and Chau, K.W. The relationship between construction project management theory and transaction cost economies. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 1999, 6, 166-176.
167、 Westney, D. Eleanor. 1988. Domestic and foreign learning curves in managing international cooperative strategies. In F. Contractor & P. Lorange, editors, Cooperative strategies in international business. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
168、 Williamson,O.E., Markets and Hierarchies :Analysis and AntitrustImplications,New York,1975,The Free Press
169、 Williamson,O.E., Transaction cost economics: the governance of contractural relations, Journal of Law and Economics, 1979,22, 233-261.
170、 Winter. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, 1987, pp.59-84.
171、 Witz J. Wilcox L. Knowledge Management and Its Integrative Elements. CRC Press, 1997.
172、 Yi Ming Tseng. International Strategies and Knowledge Transfer Experiences of MNCs' Taiwanese Subsidiaries. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Mar2006, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p120-125.
173、 Yossef Spiegel. Horizontal Subcontracting. RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, 1993, vol. 24(4), pages 570-590, Winter.
174、 Yong Suhk Pak; Young-ryeol Park. A Framework of Knowledge Transfer in Cross-border Joint Ventures: An Empirical Test of the Korean Context. Management International Review (MIR), 2004 4th Quarter, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p417-434.
175、 Yue Wang; Nicholas, Stephen. Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Replication, and Learning in Non-equity Alliances: Operating Contractual Joint Ventures in China. Management International Review (MIR), 2005 1st Quarter, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p99-118.
176、 Zander, Udo. 1991. Exploiting a technological edge: Voluntary and involuntary dissemination of technology. Stockholm: Institute of International Business.
2、 蔡声霞.技术知识、组织学习与发展中国家的技术转移对策 [J].环渤海经济瞭望,2003(12)
3、 陈颖.我国纺织服装企业国际化经营中的贴牌战略[J].上海纺织科技,2003(3)
4、 陈振祥.ODM 策略之理论架构与实证 [D].台湾:国立台湾大学,民 85.
5、 葛京.企业国际化过程中的知识转移与组织学习[J].中国软科学,2002(1)
6、 龚毅、谢恩.中外企业战略联盟知识转移效率的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2005(4)
7、 关涛.跨国公司内部知识转移过程与影响因素的实证研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2005
8、 韩宇.知识转移及其分析方法研究 [D].天津:天津大学,2004
9、 韩中和.从贴牌生产到创建国际品牌[J].国际商务研究,2003(2)
10、 何俊.中国企业国际化的战略选择及模式研究[J].前沿,2006(4)
11、 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟著,结构方程模型及其应用,北京:教育科学出版社,2004
12、 黄燕,冯禹丁.代工企业的品牌冲动[J].互联网周刊,2003(30)
13、 江霈、王述英. 外包生产模式及其对市场结构影响的分析[J].中国工业经济,2005(6)
14、 李伟.隐性知识转移机制的研究[J].情报杂志,2005(4)
15、 李逸宁.自有品牌与代工品牌之竞合关系[D].台湾:东海大学,民 94
16、 卢锋 . 产品内分工:一个分析框架 [Z]. 北大中国经济研究中心中文讨论稿,No.C2004005。
17、 林莉.基于 U/I 知识联盟的知识转移研究 [D].辽宁:大连理工大学,2004
18、 刘丽萍.知识转移过程的运行机制与隐性知识转移机理研究[J].哲学动态,2004(9)
19、 刘亮亮,王正斌.代工企业在跨国生产外包中的决策模型及风险因素分析[J].西安邮电学院学报,2005(2)
20、 刘志彪.中国沿海地区制造业发展:国际代工合作模式与创新[J].南开经济研究,2005(5)
21、 马超.诠释 OEM、ODM 和 OBM[J].电子质量,2003(2)
22、 迈克尔·波特.竞争战略[M].华夏出版社,2005
23、 裴珍珍,全球制造网络中知识转移影响因素研究,浙江大学,2006 年 4 月 硕士论文
24、 彭佳.虚拟企业的知识转移问题研究[D].辽宁:东北大学,2005
25、 秦仪,罗霄.论企业跨国经营中的知识管理[J].中国软科学,2002(6)
26、 任辉.基于网络视角的跨国公司知识转移机制研究[J].技术经济,2005(8)
27、 任荣.企业知识转移效果的评价[J].科技情报开发与经济,2005(4)
28、 施振荣.再造宏碁:开创、成长与挑战.[Z].中信出版社,2005 年第一版。
29、 孙扬澄.跨国公司生产外包战略及其管理研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2003
30、 王开明.试论知识的转移与扩散[J].外国经济与管理,2000(10)
31、 王来武.试论知识产品国际转移的动因及其经济效应[J].外向经济,1999(Z1)
32、 汪应洛.知识的转移特性研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002(10)
33、 王伟、黄瑞华.知识转移的效率:知识特性和内部知识市场的影响[J].科学学与科技技术管理,2006(3)
34、 肖小勇.基于企业网络的组织间知识转移研究[D].中南大学,2005,博士
35、 肖学芳.企业跨国经营中的贴牌战略[J]. 中外管理导报,2002(2)
36、 许强.基于知识转移的母子公司关系管理研究 [D].浙江:浙江大学,2003
37、 徐婉萍.自有品牌开发对客户权益的影响分析-以电脑代工业为例[D].台湾:东吴大学,民 93
38、 杨洋.企业代工动机、种类、强度与企业绩效的关系研究 [D].浙江:浙江大学,2005。
39、 于鹏、曲明军.跨国公司内部知识转移机制研究[J].山东社会科学,2006(3)
40、 张殿文.虎与狐——台湾首富郭台铭经营之道揭密[M].汕头大学出版社,2005
41、 张莉.知识转移的影响因素及转移过程研究[J].情报科学,2005(11)
42、 张凯程.供应链下 OEM、ODM 契约之研究[D].台湾:世新大学,民 95
43、 赵文丁.新型国际分工格局下中国制造业的比较优势[J]. 中国工业经济,2003(8)
44、 赵雪锋.IT 项目中隐性知识转移方法的选择及转移绩效的衡量[J].经济论坛,2005(18)
45、 郑文胜.代工之路还可以走多元?[J].引进与决策,2005(5)
46、 钟国节. 做自有品牌还是做专业代工——GDS 业务模式选择的分析与思考 [D].上海:复旦大学,2003
47、 周晓东.企业知识内部转移:模式、影响因素与机制分析[J].南开管理评论,2003(5)
48、 朱方伟.技术转移中隐性知识转化的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(11)
49、 卓秋季.代工合作模式与创新关联之研究 [D].台湾:国立政治大学,民 86.
50、 Ai-Ting Goh and Henry Y. Wan, Jr. Fragmentation, Engel’s Law and Learning[J].Review of International Economics, 13(3), 518-528, 2005.
51、 Almedia, P. and Grant, L. International corporations and Cross-border knowledge transfer in the Semiconductor industry. Available: http://cbi.gaa.cmu.dee/newwebl/1998/working pgent/Almedia.btml.
52、 A.K.Yeung, D.O.Ulrich, S.W.Nason, M.A.Von Glinow. Organizational Learning Capacity: Generating Ideas with Impact. Oxford University Press, 1999.117-159
53、 Appleyard. How does knowledge flow? Inter-firm patterns in the semiconductor industry, Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(Winter special issue):137-154.
54、 Argote,L.,Ingram,P. Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2000,82(1):150- 169
55、 Atamturk, Alper; Hochbaum, Dorit S. Capacity Acquisition, Subcontracting, and Lot Sizing. Management Science, Aug2001, Vol. 47 Issue 8, p1081.
56、 Barney J., 1991, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal Of Management, (17):99 -120.
57、 Bartle, M Christopher A.; Ghoshal, Sumantra. Managing across Border: New Strategic Requirement. Sloan Management Review, VoC28, Issue 4, Summer 1987.
58、 Baughn, Denekamp, Stevens, & Osborn. Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances. Journal of World Business, 1997, Vol.32, pp.103–117
59、 Beckman, T.J. The current state of knowledge manangement.In Leibowtiz, J. (ed.), Knowledge Management Handbook. Boca: CRC Press, 1999, 1-22.
60、 Bernard L Simonin. An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, Volume
35, Number 5, September 2004, pp. 407-427(21).
61、 Berry, T.W. 1983. Acculturation: A comparative analysis of alternative forms. In R.J. Samuda & S.L. Woods, editors, Perspectives in immigrant and minority education. Lanham: University Press of America.
62、 Bertrand, J.W.M.; Sridharan, V.A study of simple rules for subcontracting in make-to-order manufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 02/01/2001, Vol. 128 Issue 3, p509-531
63、 B.L. Jr. Badaracco. Alliances speed knowledge transfer. Planning Review, 1991 (19):10-16.
64、 B.L.Simonin, Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999(9): 595-623.
65、 B.Kogut, U.Zander. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 1993(4): 625-643.
66、 Boomsma A.Nonconvergence, improper solutions and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 1982, 50: 229-242.
67、 Bresman, Henrik; Birkinshaw, Julian; Nobel, Robert. Knowledge Transfer in International Acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 1999 3rd Quarter, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p439-462.
68、 Br?chner, Jan; Rosander, Sara; Waara, Fredrik. Cross-border post-acquisition knowledge transfer among construction consultants. Construction Management and Economics , 22 (4) pp. 421-427
69、 Brodsky, Subcontracting Made Easy. Norm. Inc., Feb2005, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p47-48
70、 Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr., A Paradigam for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, Feb, 1979, 16:64-73.
71、 Clayton & Wellington. Use of formal and informal control mechanisms in international joint venture: Australian and Indian joint venture partnerships. 2002, Competitive paper for IMP conference Dijon.
72、 Coase Ronald. The nature ofthe firm. 1937, Economica 4, 386-405.
73、 Coe, David, Alexander Hoffmaister, and Elhanan Helpman. North-South R&D Spillovers. Economic Journal, 1997, 107, 440: 134-149.
74、 Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L.Working Knowledge: How Organizations to manage what they know [M]. Harvard Business School Press. 1998.
75、 David Y.F.L., Joo E.Lee-Partridge, Exploring Knowledge Management Perceptions among Information Systems Managers-Emprical Sense-Making through Focus Group Research, Australian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 2001: 42-55.
76、 Davidson, W.H. 1983. Structure and performance in international technology transfer. Journal of Management Studies, 20(4): 453-466.
77、 Deardorff, Alan; Djankov, Simeon. Knowledge Transfer under Subcontracting: Evidence from Czech Firms. World Development, Oct2000, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p1837
78、 Devapriya, K.A.K.; Ganesan, S. Technology transfer subcontracting in developing countries through. Building Research & Information, May2002, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p171-182.
79、 Dinur & Inkpen et al, Knowledge transfer in the multinational corporations. Paperpresented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of International business, Vienna, Austria, 1998.
80、 Dixon N.M.Common knowledge: how companies thrive by sharing what they know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2000
81、 Dretske F. Knowledge and Flow of Information, Cambridge (Mass.): 1981, MIT Press.
82、 Drucker, P. The coming of the new organisation Harvard Business Review, 1988, 66(1), 45-53
83、 Dulbecco, Philippe; Vagneron, Isabelle. Competition, Co-Operation and Subcontracting: Lessons from the Clothing Industry in Thailand. European Journal of Development Research, Dec2001, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p58.
84、 Eric .S. Rebentisch & Marco Ferretti. A knowledge asset-based view of technology transfer in international joint ventures. Journal of engineering and technology management, 1995, 12, 1-25.
85、 Ernst, D. The economics of electronics industry: competitive dynamics and industrial organization. In. Warner, M., Lazonick, W. (Eds)., The International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, International Thomson Business Press, London, In Press. 2002a
86、 Ernst, D.Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation of the economics of innovation and new technologies, 2002b, 12, 1-27.
87、 Ernst D., Linsu Kim. Global production networks, knowledge diffusion and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31, 2002, 1417-1429.
88、 Erol Taymaz-Yilmaz Kilcaslan. Determinants of subcontracting and regional development: an empirical study on Turkish textile and engineering industries. 2nd Revision, July 16, 2004.
89、 Feenstra,Robert C. Integration of trade and disintegration of Production in the Global Economy ,Journal of Economic Perspective ,Vol.12,no.4,1998 Fall,pp.31-50.
90、 Gereffi G.,Humphrey J.,Sturgeon T. The governance ofglobal value chains ,Review of International Political Economy,2005,Vol.12,Issue1,pp.78-104
91、 Ghoshal. S and Nohria.N, Internal differentiation within multinational corporations, Strategic management journal, 1989, Issue 10.
92、 Gonzalez-Diaz, Manuel; Arrunada, Benito. Causes of subcontracting: Evidence from panel data on construction firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Jun2000, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p167.
93、 Gunnarson, Sven, and Levitt, Raymond, E. Is a building a hierarchy or a market?, Proceedings of the 7th Internet Congress, Copenhagen, 1982
94、 Hakanson, Lars 1995. Learning through acquisitions: Management and integration of foreign R&D laboratories. International Studies of Management and Organization, 25 (1-2): 121-158.
95、 Hamel.Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. SMJ, 1991, Vol.12, 83-103
96、 Hamel, G.; Prahalad, C.H. Corporate imagination and expeditionary marketing. Harvard Business Review, J ul/Aug1991, Vol 69.
97、 Hasegawa Harukiyo and Glenn D.Hook Edited.Japanese Business Management: Restructuring for low growth and globalization,Journal of Financial Economics,55,March 2000
98、 Haspeslagh, P. and Jemison, D.B.1991; Managing acquisitions, New York: Free Press
99、 Hayashi, Mitsuhiro. The role of subcontracting in SME development in Indonesia: Micro-level evidence from the metalworking and machinery industry. Journal of Asian Economics, Jan/Feb2002, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1.
100、 Heshmati, A. Productivity Growth, Efficiency and Outsourcing in Manufacturing and Services. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2003, 17(1), 79-112.
101、 Hewitt-Dundas, Nola; Bernadette Andréosso-O'Callaghan; Crone, Mike; Roper, Stephen. Knowledge Transfers from Multinational Plants in Ireland. European Urban & Regional Studies, Jan2005, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p23-43.
102、 Holmes. The organization and localization of production subcontracting i Scott, A. J. & Storper, M. J. (eds.): Production, work, territory. The geographical anatomy of industrial capitalism. 1986,Allen & Unwin, Boston
103、 Hou, C.M. and S. Gee.National systems supporting technical advance in industry: the case of Taiwan. In Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A comparative analysis, New York: Oxford University Press, P 384-413.
104、 Hummels ,D.,Jun Ishii ,Kei-Mu Yi ,2001.The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Journal of International Economics ,54,pp.75-96.
105、 Hymer. S, The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Investment. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press, 1960.
106、 Inkpen. Learning and knowledge acquisition throgh international strategic alliances. Academy of management Executive, 1998, Vol. 12, No.4, PP 69-71
107、 Inkpen, A.C. Creating knowledge through collaboration, California Management Review, 1996, 39(1):123-140.
108、 Inkpen, Andrew. Learning and collaboration: An examination of North American - Japanese Joint Ventures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, 1992.
109、 Jaehwa Lee. Role of Foreign Direct Investment in Knowledge Spillovers: Firm-Level Evidence from Korean Firms’ Patent and Patent Citations, The Journal of the Korean Economy, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Spring 2004), 47-67
110、 J Bontis, N., Crossan, M. and Fulland, J. Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows of knowledge. Journal of Management Studies,20 01.38(forthcoming)
111、 Jensen, Robert; Szulanski, Gabriel. Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies, Nov2004, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p508-523.
112、 Johannessen, Olsen & Olaisen.Aspects of innovation theory based on knowledge-management. International Journal of Information Management, 1999, Vol. 19, pp. 121-139.
113、 Johnstone, B. Taiwan holds its lead, local makers move into new systems, Far Eastern Economic Review, 1989, 31 August, P 50-51.
114、 Joreskog K.G., Sorbom D. Lisrel 7: A guide to the program and application (2nd ed.). Chicago: SPSS, 1988.
115、 Kane, Aimée A.; Argote, Linda; Levine, Job M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, Jan2005, Vol. 96 Issue 1, p56-71.
116、 Karlsen, Jan Terje,Gottschalk, Petter,Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer in IT Projects,Engineering Management Journal; Mar2004, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p3-10, 8p
117、 Kogut, B., Shan, W. & Walker, G. Knowledge in the network and the network as knowledge: the structuring of new industries. G. Grabher (. The Embedded Firm. London: Routledge. 1988, 67-94
118、 Kojima and Ozawa, Towards a theory of industrial restructuring and dynamic comparative advantage, Hitotsubashi journal of economics, 1985, December, volume26, Issue2.
119、 Kojima, K, Direct foreign investment: A Japanese model of multinational business operations. London: Croom Helm, 1978.
120、 Kotabe, Masaaki,Martin, Xavier,Domoto, Hiroshi. Gaining from vertical partnerships: knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries,Strategic managment journal, 2003, Vol24, Issue4, P293-316.
121、 Kwan, M. Millie; Cheung, Pak-Keung. The Knowledge Transfer Process: From Field Studies to Technology Development. Journal of Database Management, Jan-Mar2006, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p16-32.
122、 Law, Y.F.D. and Lee-Partridge, J.E. “Sense-Making of Empirical Knowledge Management Perceptions Through Frames of Reference,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS’2001), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, December 16-19, 2001, 5 pages.
123、 Lihui Lin; Xianjun Geng; Whinston, Andrew B. A Sender receiver Framework for Knowledge Transfer. MIS Quarterly, Jun2005, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p197-219.
124、 Lindgren, U. 1982. Foreign acquisitions: Management of the integration process. Stockholm: Institute of International Business.
125、 Lippman S, Rumelt R.Uncertain imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition.Bell Journal Economics, 1982, 13:418-438.
126、 Mansfield, E. 1985. How rapidly does new industrial technology leakout. Journal of Industrial Economics, 34: 217-223.
127、 Masson, R. M. Strategic information systems: Use of information technology in a learning organization,Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 93.CA: IEEE Press, 1993,P :840 -849.
128、 McDonald R.P, Ho M.R. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psycholgical Methods, 2002, 7:64-82.
129、 M. Hobday. Innovation in East Asia: Diversity and Development. Technovation Volume: 15, Issue: 2, March, 1995, pp. 55-63.
130、 Minbaeva, Dana B.; Michailova, Snejina. Knowledge transfer and expatriation in multinational corporations: The role of disseminative capacity. Employee Relations, 2004, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p663-679.
131、 Miwa, Yoshiro; Ramseyer, J. Mark. Rethinking Relationship-specific Investments: Subcontracting in the Japanese Automobile Industry. Michigan Law Review, Aug2000, Vol. 98 Issue 8, p2636.
132、 M.L.Qunjian, E.B.Came, A study of the factors which affect technology transfer in a multilocation multibusiness unit corporation [J]. IEEE Transactions on EngineeringManagement, 1987(34): 194-201.
133、 Montgomery, David B.; Isobe, Takehiko; Makino, Shige. Cross-Border Knowledge Transfer and Performance in Emerging Economic Regions: the Case of Japanese International Joint Ventures in China. Working Papers (Faculty) -- Stanford Graduate School of Business, 1998, preceding p1-45.
134、 Mowery, David C.; Oxley, Joanne E.; Silverman, Brian S. Strategic Alliances and Inter-firm Knowledge Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, Winter96 Special Issue, Vol. 17, p77-91.
135、 Moore, K.J., A strategy for subsidiaries: centers of excellences to build subsidiary specific advantages. Management International Revie, 2001, 41(3):p275-290.
136、 Muthusamy, Senthil K.; White, Margaret A. Learning and Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances: A Social Exchange View. Organization Studies (Sage Publications Inc.), 2005, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p415-441,
137、 Nelson, R. y Winter, S. 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge (MA), Belknap-. Harvard University Press.
138、 Nevis, E.C.; DiBella, A.J.; and Gould, J.M. "Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems. Sloan Management Review. Vol (36), Winter, 1995, P: 73 -85.
139、 Nonaka. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 1994,Vol.5(1), pp.14-37
140、 Nonaka & Takeuchi. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies create the Dynmics of Innovation. 1995, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
141、 Penrose E.T. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley, 1959.
142、 Peter Biegelbauer, Erich Grie?ler, Margit Leuthold. The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Knowledge Base of Central and Eastern European Countries. Reihe Politikwissenschaft.
143、 Pien Wang; Kulwant Singh; Chun Peng Koh; Wenfeng Tong.Determinants and Outcomes of Knowledge Transfer: A Study of MNCs in China. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2001, pK1, 6p.
144、 Reed & DeFillippi. 1990, “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage.” Academy of Management Review, 15(1), pp.88-102.
145、 Reve, T. and Levitt, R.E. Organisation and governance in construction, Project management, 1984, 2, 17-25.
146、 Rhee, Y., Ross-Larson, B. and Pursell, G.Korea’s competitive edge: managing entry into world markets (1984, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press).
147、 Riusala, Kimmo; Suutari, Vesa. International Knowledge Transfers through Expatriates. Thunderbird International Business Review, Nov/Dec2004, Vol. 46 Issue 6, p743-770.
148、 Rodrik, Dani. 1994. “Industrial Organization and Product Quality: Evidence from South Korean and Taiwanese Exports,” In Paul Krugman and Alisdair Smith, Eds., Empirical Studies of Strategic Trade Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago Press, pp. 195-210.
149、 Se-Hwa Wu & Frederick B.Hsu. Towards a knowledge-based view of OEM relationship building: sharing of industrial experiences in Taiwan. International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.22, No.5, 2001.
150、 Senge, P .M. The leader new work: Building learning organization. Sloan Management Review, 1990(11), P 7-23.
151、 Shrivastava, P. Postmerger integration. Journal of Business Strategy, 1986, 7(1): 65-77.
152、 Simonin, B.L. Transfer of marketing know-how in international strategic alliances: An empirical investigation of the role and antecedents of knowledge ambiguity. Journal of International Business Studies, 1999, 30(3): 463-490.
153、 Stinchombe, A. L. Bureaucratic and Craft Administration of Production: "A Comparative Study. Administrative Science Quarterly 4 (September): 1959, 168-87
154、 Subramanian, A. and Nilakanta, S. Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Journal of International Management, 1996, 24(6):631-647.
155、 S.Zahra, G. George. Absorptive capacity:A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review,2002,Vo1.27,No.2,185～203.
156、 Szulanski. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, Vol.17, winter special, pp.27-43.
157、 Szulanski, Gabriel; Cappetta, Rossella; Jensen, Robert J. When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, Sep/Oct2004, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p600-613.
158、 Taymaz, Erol; Kili?aslan, Yilmaz. Determinants of Subcontracting and Regional Development: An Empirical Study on Turkish Textile and Engineering Industries. Regional Studies, Jul2005, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p633-645.
159、 Teece D.Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982.
160、 Teece. Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1996, 31(2): pp.193-224.
161、 T Hansen, M.T. "The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing know ledge across organizational subunits. Administrative science quarterly, 1999, 44.
162、 Van der Spek R., Spijkervert A., Knowledge Management: Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge, in Liebo
163、 Vernon. R, International investment and international trade in the product cycle, Quartly Journal of Economics, 1966.
164、 Vito Albino, Claudio Garavelli A. Giovanni Schiuma. Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts: The role of the leader firm. Technovation, 1999, 19:53-63.
165、 Walker, A. Project management in construction, 3rd Edn, Blackwell, 1996, Oxford.
166、 Walker, A. and Chau, K.W. The relationship between construction project management theory and transaction cost economies. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 1999, 6, 166-176.
167、 Westney, D. Eleanor. 1988. Domestic and foreign learning curves in managing international cooperative strategies. In F. Contractor & P. Lorange, editors, Cooperative strategies in international business. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
168、 Williamson,O.E., Markets and Hierarchies :Analysis and AntitrustImplications,New York,1975,The Free Press
169、 Williamson,O.E., Transaction cost economics: the governance of contractural relations, Journal of Law and Economics, 1979,22, 233-261.
170、 Winter. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, 1987, pp.59-84.
171、 Witz J. Wilcox L. Knowledge Management and Its Integrative Elements. CRC Press, 1997.
172、 Yi Ming Tseng. International Strategies and Knowledge Transfer Experiences of MNCs' Taiwanese Subsidiaries. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Mar2006, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p120-125.
173、 Yossef Spiegel. Horizontal Subcontracting. RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, 1993, vol. 24(4), pages 570-590, Winter.
174、 Yong Suhk Pak; Young-ryeol Park. A Framework of Knowledge Transfer in Cross-border Joint Ventures: An Empirical Test of the Korean Context. Management International Review (MIR), 2004 4th Quarter, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p417-434.
175、 Yue Wang; Nicholas, Stephen. Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Replication, and Learning in Non-equity Alliances: Operating Contractual Joint Ventures in China. Management International Review (MIR), 2005 1st Quarter, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p99-118.
176、 Zander, Udo. 1991. Exploiting a technological edge: Voluntary and involuntary dissemination of technology. Stockholm: Institute of International Business.