黔南—桂中地区石炭纪层序岩相古地理特征及演化
|
摘要
近年我国的海相油气勘探在四川、塔里木等取得了一些重要突破和发现。黔南桂中地区石炭系为中国南方海相地层发育最好的地区之一,为了弄清研究区到底有不有勘探潜力以及勘探方向,因此本论文通过对黔南桂中地区石炭系地层系统、沉积体系特征、层序地层、层序岩相古地理特征及演化和层序格架中的储层特征的研究,为勘探提供依据,取得了以下几点认识:
根据最新的岩石地层和区域地质志,按不同坳陷和不同沉积区厘定了研究区石炭系地层,并进行了对比。
在沉积学和岩相古地理工作方法的理论的指导下,通过基干剖面的实测、辅助剖面的观测和钻井资料的研究,根据岩石类型、岩性组合、剖面结构和沉积构造,在研究石炭系共识别出了4种沉积体系,分别是海岸沉积体系、碳酸盐台地沉积体系、台盆沉积体系和陆棚沉积体系,同时划分了相应的沉积相、亚相和微相。总的来看,研究区表现出由北到南为古陆→滨岸→陆棚→碳酸盐台地→台盆与台地相互交错的沉积相带变化趋势,并建立了沉积模式。
对黔南桂中地区石炭的层序界面特征及成因类型进行了详细研究,共识别出古风化壳、大气淡水作用面、岩性岩相转换面、最大海泛面等层序界面。在层序界面识别的基础上将石炭系划分出2个超层序,11个三级层序,详细讨论各超层序及三级层序的体系域特征及层序特征,并对研究区的三级层序进行了对比,三级层序在研究区皆可以对比。
在层序划分和对比的基础上,以超层序体系域为编图单元,采用体系域压缩法编制了5张黔南桂中地区石炭纪构造—层序岩相古地理图,揭示了黔南桂中地区石炭纪岩相古地理特征。SS1低位期,紫云运动造成研究区大部分地区暴露,黔南主要发育陆棚和局限台地,桂中地区为台盆和台地相间的沉积格局;SS1海侵期,海平面快速上升,黔南发育滨岸沉积,桂中地区台盆范围扩大;SS1高位期古地理格局变化不大,由于海水下降,台地扩大,台盆缩小;SS2构造运动减弱,古地理格局发生明显变化,海侵期仍以台地和台盆沉积为主,台盆被充填萎缩,变得狭窄,台地范围变大,SS2高位期由于石炭世末的黔桂运动造成黔北和黔中地区隆起成陆,海水向南退缩,台盆范围继续变小,呈现台包盆格局。
基于储层孔隙类型和物性分析,研究区储层为上石炭统大埔组和黄龙组台地相的白云岩和生物碎屑灰岩,均属于低孔低渗储层,其中大埔组的物性好于黄龙组。储层主要发育于高位体系域中,高位期海平面下降,引起台地相中的白云岩、生物礁灰岩的暴露和溶蚀形成大量的溶蚀孔洞。
Recent years China’s marine hydrocarbon exploration has achieved some significant breakthrough and discoveries in Sichuan Basin and Tarim Basin. Carboniferous of South Guizhou and Middle Guangxi is one of best developed areas for marine stratum, to figure out whether there is exploration potential or not and the exploration direction, so this thesis focuses on Carboniferous stratum system, depositional system characteristic, sequence stratigraphy, characteristic and evolution of sequence lithofacies paleogeographic and reservoir characteristic within sequence framework in South Guizhou and Middle Guangxi, which can provide some exploration proofs. Several achievements have gained as follow.
According to the latest rock stratigraphic and regional geology, the Carboniferous stratum has been regularized in different sedimentary area of different depression, and they has been contrasted.
Guided by the theories of sedimentology and the work methods of lithofacies paleogeographic, and based on measurement of main field geological sections, observation of supplementary field geological sections and data of drilling, according to types of rock, combination of rock, section character and sedimentary structure, four depositional systems are distinguished in Carboniferous of study area, they are coastal depositional system, carbonate platform depositional system, platform basin depositional system and shelf depositional system, meanwhile the depositional facies, subfacies and microfacies were divided. Taking one with another, the depositional facies belts was kind of old land-shore-shelf-carbonate platform-platform basin interleaved with platform. The depositional models have also been established.
After detailedly study on Carboniferous sequence boundary characteristic and genesis types in South Guizhou and Middle Guangxi, the sequence boundaries, paleocrust of weathering, atmospheric water effect surface, lithology and lithofacies transitional surface and maximum flooding surface, were identified. Based on the sequence boundary identification, Carboniferous can be divided into 2 super sequence and 11 third-order sequence, the system tracts and sequence characteristic of each super sequence and third-order sequence were carefully discussed, and the third-order sequence was contrasted in study area, which are comparable in study area.
Based on sequence division and contrasting, taking system tracts of super sequence as compilation unit and using system tracts compression method, five Carboniferous tectonic-sequence lithofacies paleogeographic in South Guizhou and Middle Guangxi were drew, which can show the Carboniferous paleogeographic character of study area. During SS1 lowstand period, Ziyun movement caused the exposure of most parts of study area, shelf and restricted platform developed in south Guizhou, and it showed the sedimentary pattern of platform basin interleaved with platform in Middle Guangxi, then to transgression period, sea level rose quickly, shore developed in South Guizhou, platform basin expanded in Middle Guangxi, during highstand period, the paleogeographic pattern changed little, platform expanded, platform basin shrunk. Then in SS2 stage tectonic movement became weaken, the depositional facies pattern changed a lot. During transgression period, the sedimentary facies mainly were platform and platform basin, platform basin was filling and shrunk continuously, and platform range continued to expand. Finally during SS2 highstand period, due to the Qiangui movement in late of Carboniferous, north and middle Guizhou rose to be land, sea retreated forward south, platform basin shrunk continued, it showed the depositional pattern of basin surrounding by platform.
By analysis of pore type and physical property of reservoir, the main reservoir of study area is dolomite and biodetritus limestone in platform of Dabu Formation and Huanglong Formation, which all are reservoir of low porosity and low permeability, the physical property of Dabu Formation is better than the one of Huanglong Formation. Reservoir mainly developed in highstand system tracts, as the fall of sea level, the exposure and erosion of dolomite and biodetritus limestone in platform formed a large number of solution cave.
根据最新的岩石地层和区域地质志,按不同坳陷和不同沉积区厘定了研究区石炭系地层,并进行了对比。
在沉积学和岩相古地理工作方法的理论的指导下,通过基干剖面的实测、辅助剖面的观测和钻井资料的研究,根据岩石类型、岩性组合、剖面结构和沉积构造,在研究石炭系共识别出了4种沉积体系,分别是海岸沉积体系、碳酸盐台地沉积体系、台盆沉积体系和陆棚沉积体系,同时划分了相应的沉积相、亚相和微相。总的来看,研究区表现出由北到南为古陆→滨岸→陆棚→碳酸盐台地→台盆与台地相互交错的沉积相带变化趋势,并建立了沉积模式。
对黔南桂中地区石炭的层序界面特征及成因类型进行了详细研究,共识别出古风化壳、大气淡水作用面、岩性岩相转换面、最大海泛面等层序界面。在层序界面识别的基础上将石炭系划分出2个超层序,11个三级层序,详细讨论各超层序及三级层序的体系域特征及层序特征,并对研究区的三级层序进行了对比,三级层序在研究区皆可以对比。
在层序划分和对比的基础上,以超层序体系域为编图单元,采用体系域压缩法编制了5张黔南桂中地区石炭纪构造—层序岩相古地理图,揭示了黔南桂中地区石炭纪岩相古地理特征。SS1低位期,紫云运动造成研究区大部分地区暴露,黔南主要发育陆棚和局限台地,桂中地区为台盆和台地相间的沉积格局;SS1海侵期,海平面快速上升,黔南发育滨岸沉积,桂中地区台盆范围扩大;SS1高位期古地理格局变化不大,由于海水下降,台地扩大,台盆缩小;SS2构造运动减弱,古地理格局发生明显变化,海侵期仍以台地和台盆沉积为主,台盆被充填萎缩,变得狭窄,台地范围变大,SS2高位期由于石炭世末的黔桂运动造成黔北和黔中地区隆起成陆,海水向南退缩,台盆范围继续变小,呈现台包盆格局。
基于储层孔隙类型和物性分析,研究区储层为上石炭统大埔组和黄龙组台地相的白云岩和生物碎屑灰岩,均属于低孔低渗储层,其中大埔组的物性好于黄龙组。储层主要发育于高位体系域中,高位期海平面下降,引起台地相中的白云岩、生物礁灰岩的暴露和溶蚀形成大量的溶蚀孔洞。
Recent years China’s marine hydrocarbon exploration has achieved some significant breakthrough and discoveries in Sichuan Basin and Tarim Basin. Carboniferous of South Guizhou and Middle Guangxi is one of best developed areas for marine stratum, to figure out whether there is exploration potential or not and the exploration direction, so this thesis focuses on Carboniferous stratum system, depositional system characteristic, sequence stratigraphy, characteristic and evolution of sequence lithofacies paleogeographic and reservoir characteristic within sequence framework in South Guizhou and Middle Guangxi, which can provide some exploration proofs. Several achievements have gained as follow.
According to the latest rock stratigraphic and regional geology, the Carboniferous stratum has been regularized in different sedimentary area of different depression, and they has been contrasted.
Guided by the theories of sedimentology and the work methods of lithofacies paleogeographic, and based on measurement of main field geological sections, observation of supplementary field geological sections and data of drilling, according to types of rock, combination of rock, section character and sedimentary structure, four depositional systems are distinguished in Carboniferous of study area, they are coastal depositional system, carbonate platform depositional system, platform basin depositional system and shelf depositional system, meanwhile the depositional facies, subfacies and microfacies were divided. Taking one with another, the depositional facies belts was kind of old land-shore-shelf-carbonate platform-platform basin interleaved with platform. The depositional models have also been established.
After detailedly study on Carboniferous sequence boundary characteristic and genesis types in South Guizhou and Middle Guangxi, the sequence boundaries, paleocrust of weathering, atmospheric water effect surface, lithology and lithofacies transitional surface and maximum flooding surface, were identified. Based on the sequence boundary identification, Carboniferous can be divided into 2 super sequence and 11 third-order sequence, the system tracts and sequence characteristic of each super sequence and third-order sequence were carefully discussed, and the third-order sequence was contrasted in study area, which are comparable in study area.
Based on sequence division and contrasting, taking system tracts of super sequence as compilation unit and using system tracts compression method, five Carboniferous tectonic-sequence lithofacies paleogeographic in South Guizhou and Middle Guangxi were drew, which can show the Carboniferous paleogeographic character of study area. During SS1 lowstand period, Ziyun movement caused the exposure of most parts of study area, shelf and restricted platform developed in south Guizhou, and it showed the sedimentary pattern of platform basin interleaved with platform in Middle Guangxi, then to transgression period, sea level rose quickly, shore developed in South Guizhou, platform basin expanded in Middle Guangxi, during highstand period, the paleogeographic pattern changed little, platform expanded, platform basin shrunk. Then in SS2 stage tectonic movement became weaken, the depositional facies pattern changed a lot. During transgression period, the sedimentary facies mainly were platform and platform basin, platform basin was filling and shrunk continuously, and platform range continued to expand. Finally during SS2 highstand period, due to the Qiangui movement in late of Carboniferous, north and middle Guizhou rose to be land, sea retreated forward south, platform basin shrunk continued, it showed the depositional pattern of basin surrounding by platform.
By analysis of pore type and physical property of reservoir, the main reservoir of study area is dolomite and biodetritus limestone in platform of Dabu Formation and Huanglong Formation, which all are reservoir of low porosity and low permeability, the physical property of Dabu Formation is better than the one of Huanglong Formation. Reservoir mainly developed in highstand system tracts, as the fall of sea level, the exposure and erosion of dolomite and biodetritus limestone in platform formed a large number of solution cave.
引文
Vail P R. Seismic stratigrahpy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy. Part 1: seismic stratigrahpy interpretation procedure[J]. American Association of Petroleum Geologist ,Studies in Geology ,1987,27(1):1-10
C. J. R. Braithwaite. Cement sequence stratigraphy in carbonates[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research; March 1993; v. 63; no. 2; p. 295-303
Peters K E. A new geochmical-sequence stratigraphic model for the Mahakam Delta and Makassar Slope, Kalimantan, Indonesia[J]. AAPG Bulletin; January 2000; v. 84; no. 1; p. 12-44
Bohacs K M. Lake-basin type, source potential, and hydrocarbon character: an integrated sequence- stratigraphic-geochemical framework[J].AAPG Studies in Geology 46, pp. 3–33
Galloway. W. E. Genetic stratigraphy sequence in basin analysisⅠ: Architecture and genesis o f flooding suface bounded depositional units[J] AAPG Bulletin ,1989,73:125-142
Johnson. J. H, Klaper G. North American midcontinent Devonian T-R cycles[J] Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 1992,145:127-135
P. Courville , P.Y. Collin. Taphonomic sequences—A new tool for sequence stratigraphy [J]. GEOLOGY, June 2002:511-514
Daniel J. Lehrmann, Jiayong Wei, Paul Enos. Controls on facies architecture of a large triassic carbonate platform: the great bank of guizhou,nanpanjiang basin, south China [j]. Journal of sedimentary research, vol. 68, no. 2, march, 1998, p. 311–326
Jonathan l. Payne,Daniel J. Lehrmann,Shannon Christensen. Environmental and biological controls on the initiation and growth of a middle triassic (anisian) reef complex on the great bank of Guizhou,Guizhou province, China[j]. . Palaios, 2006, v. 21, p. 325–343
M. Menning, A.S. Alekseev, B.I. Chuvashov,etc. Global time scale and regional stratigraphic reference scales of Central and West Europe,East Europe,Tethys,South China, and North America as used in the Devonian–Carboniferous–Permian Correlation Chart 2003 (DCP 2003) [J]. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology 240 (2006) 318–372
Stephen G. Peters,Huang Jiazhan,Li Zhiping, etc. Sedimentary rock-hosted Au deposits of the Dian–Qian–Gui area,Guizhou,and Yunnan Provinces,and GuangxiDistrict,China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews 31 (2007) 170–204
Brian P. Coffey, J. Fred Read. Mixed carbonate–siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy of a Paleogene transition zone continental shelf, southeastern USA[J]. Sedimentary Geology 166 (2004) 21–57
Catuneanu, V. Abreu, J.P. Bhattacharya ,etc. Towards the standardization of sequence stratigraphy [J]. Earth-Science Reviews,92 (2009): 1–33
J.L.威尔逊著,冯增昭等译地质历史中的碳酸盐相[M].北京:地质出版社,1981.3
陈宏明,吴祥和,张瑛,李耀西,文琼英等著.中国南方石炭纪岩相古地理与成矿作用[M].北京:地质出版社,1994,13-33
陈洪德,侯明才,刘文均,等.海西—印支期中国南方的盆地演化与层序格架[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(6):629-635
陈洪德,刘文均,郑荣才,等.层序地层学理论和研究方法[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1994.
陈洪德,倪新锋,田景春,等.华南海相下组合层序地层格架与油气勘探[J].石油与天然气地质,2006(03):370-377.
陈洪德,彭军,田景春,等.上扬子克拉通南缘中泥盆统—石炭系高频层序及复合海平面变化[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):181-189
陈洪德,彭军,田景春等.上扬子克拉通南缘中泥盆统-石炭系高频层序及复合海平面变化[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):181-189
陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春等.右江盆地层序格架中的生储盖组合特征及勘探意义[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):215-220.
陈洪德,田景春,刘文均,等.中国南方海相震旦系一中三叠统层序划分与对比[J].成都理工大学学报,2002,29(4):354-379
陈洪德,张锦全,刘文均.泥盆纪—石炭纪右江盆地结构与岩相古地理演化[J].广西地质, 1994,7(2):15-23.
陈洪德.广西丹池晚古生代沉积盆地的演化及控矿作用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),1988,15(4):69-78
陈洪德,曾允孚,李孝全.丹池晚古生代盆地的沉积和构造演化[J].沉积学报,1989,7(4):85-96
池秋鄂,龚福华.层序地层学基础与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001
滇黔桂石油地质志编写组.滇黔桂油气区中国石油地质志卷十一[M].北京:石油工业出版社1992
方少仙,侯方浩,董兆雄,等.白云石化作用及黔桂地区泥盆系——石炭系层(块)状白云岩的成因[J].低渗透油气田,2007,12(3):1-10
方少仙,侯方浩,董兆雄.黔桂泥盆、石炭系白云岩的形成模式[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(1):34-38
冯增昭,杨玉卿,鲍志东.中国南方石炭纪岩相古地理[J].古地理学报,1999,1(1):75-85
付志方,王焕弟,邢卫新,等.层序地层学研究现状及进展[J].勘探地球物理进展,2005,28(5):321-328
顾家裕,张兴阳.油气沉积学发展回顾和应用现状[J].沉积学报,2003,21(1):137-141
广西壮族自治区地质矿产局.广西壮族自治区区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1985.
贵州省地质矿产局.贵州省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.
郭岭,王丽丹,郭峰,等.桂中坳陷中泥盆统纳标组层序地层与岩相古地理研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报) 2009,31(2):211-214
侯明才,陈洪德,田景春.层序充填动力学——层序地层研究的新方向[J].地层学杂志,2003,27(4):358-364
侯明才.右江盆地层序充填动力学[D].成都:成都理工大学沉积地质研究院,2003.
侯中健,陈洪德,田景春,等.层序岩相古地理编图在岩相古地理分析中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2001,28(4):377-382
侯中健,陈洪德,田景春,等.右江盆地海相泥盆系-中三叠统层序界面成因类型与盆地演化[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):205-209
黄启勋.广西若干重大基础地质特征[J].广西地质,2000,13(3):3-12
黄思静,麻建明,冷德勋.广西钦州石炭—二叠纪深海硅质岩的锶同位素组成及其地质意义[J].沉积学报:1999,17(4):542-546
贾承造,刘德来,赵文智.层序地层学研究新进展[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(5):1-4
姜建军.黔南早石炭世牙行石及泥盆-石炭系分界线[J].中国区域地质,1994,1:21-27
蒋维红,董春梅,闫家宁.岩相古地理学研究现状及发展趋势[J].断块油气田,2007,14(3):1-3
焦大庆,马永生,邓军,等.黔桂地区石炭纪层序地层格架及古地理演化[J].现代地质,2003,17(3):294-320
康建威.黔南-桂中地区泥盆系层序地层及其格架中的储集体特征研究[D].成都:成都理工大学沉积地质研究院,2008
李浩.滇黔桂地区加里东构造古地理变迁及油气勘探潜力分析[D].中国地质大学(北京),2005
林小兵,李国忠,田景春,等.黔南石炭系层序地层格架中碳酸盐岩成岩作用研究[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版):2007,34(3):267-272
刘宝珺,韩作振,杨仁超.当代沉积学研究进展、前瞻与思考[J].特种油气藏,2006,13(5):1-5
刘宝珺、余光明.岩相古地理学教程[M],成都:地质矿产部岩相古地理工作协作组,1990.
刘宝珺、曾允孚.岩相古地理基础和工作方法[M],北京:地质出版社,1985.
刘宝珺.沉积岩石学[M],北京:地质出版社,1986.
刘鸿允.中国古地理图[M].北京:科学出版社,1959.
刘文均.海西—印支期华南板块的沉积特点[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),1998,25(2):328-336
刘文均,曾允孚,张锦泉,陈洪德,郑荣才.右江盆地火山岩的地球化学特点及其构造环境[J].广西地质,1993,6(2):1-12
马永生,陈洪德,王国力等.中国南方层序地层与古地理[M].北京:科学出版社,2009
梅冥相,李仲远.滇黔桂地区晚古生代至三叠纪层序地层序列及沉积盆地演化[J].现代地质,2004,18(4):555-562
梅冥相,马永生,邓军,等.滇黔桂盆地及其邻区石炭纪至二叠纪层序地层格架及三级海平面变化的全球对比[J].中国地质,2005,32(1):13-24
梅冥相,马永生,邓军,等.加里东运动构造古地理及滇黔桂盆地的形成——兼论滇黔桂盆地深层油气勘探潜力[J].地学前缘,2005,12(3):227-235
梅冥相,马永生,高金汉,等.滇黔桂盆地及其邻区晚古生代层序地层格架及相对海平面变化[J].现代地质,2002,16(4):365-373
梅冥相,孟庆芬,定红,等.黔桂地区石炭系层序地层格架及海平面变化[J].地球学报,2004,24((1):39-46
梅冥相,曾萍,初汉明,等.滇黔桂盆地及邻区泥盆纪层序地层格架及其古地理背景[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(4):546-554
牟传龙,许效松,林明.层序地层与岩相古地理编图——以中国南方泥盆纪地层为例[J].岩相古地理,1992,(4):1-9
牛新生,徐立明,等.贵州紫云运动与泥盆纪末华南板块海退事件的因果关系研究[J].华南地质与矿产,2007,1:48-50
彭军,陈洪德,田景春,等.川滇黔桂地区石炭系层序地层研究[J].沉积学报,2006,18(2):192-197
彭军,陈景山,陈洪德,等.黔桂地区石炭纪I型层序界面沉积记录及成因分析[J].地球学报,2000,21(4):433-439
孙枢.中国沉积学的今后发展:若干思考与建议[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京;北京大学),2005,12(2):3-10
孙肇才,郭正吾.中国南方古-中生界海相油气勘探研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1993.
覃建雄,陈洪德,田景春等.右江盆地层序充填序列与古特提斯海再造[J].地球学报, 2000,21(1):62-70.
覃建雄.层序地层学发展的若干重要方向[J].岩相古地理,1997, 17(2):63-70
田景春,陈洪德,彭军,等.川滇黔桂地区下、中三叠统层序划分、对比及层序地层格架[J].沉积学报,2006,18(2):198-204
田景春,陈洪德,覃建雄,等.层序-岩相古地理图及其编制[J].地球科学与环境学报,2004,26(1):6-12
田景春,陈洪德,覃建雄,等.层序底界面的物质表现形式-以中国南方海相震旦系-中三叠统为例[J].沉积学报,2003,21(4):675-680
田景春,康建威,林小兵,等.台盆沉积体系及层序地层特征研究[J].西南石油大学学报,2007,29(6):39-42
王约.贵州独山石炭系露头层序地层学研究[J].贵州地质,2001,18(4):217-223
夏文臣,雷建喜,周杰,等.黔桂地区海西-印支阶段的构造古地理演化及沉积盆地的时空组合[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1991,16(5):477-488
夏文臣,周杰,雷建喜,等.滇黔桂晚海西—中印支伸展裂谷海盆地的演化[J].地质学报,1995,69(2):97-442
许中杰,刘万洙,白雪峰,等.黔南、黔北及南盘江坳陷古生代碳酸盐岩储层特征[J].世界地质,2007,26(2):224-228
杨国臣,于炳松.层序地层学的发展现状及其学科地位与研究前沿[J].石油地质与工程,2009,23(2):1-4
杨明慧.湘桂早海西期构造层序地层与板内构造运动[J].湖南地质,1998,17(1):14-18
殷保安.广西壮族自治区岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997.
殷科华,叶德书,沈大兴,等.息烽—遵义早石炭世大塘期岩相古地理特征[J].沉积学报,2009,27(4):606-613
于兴河,郑秀娟.沉积学的发展历程与未来展望[J].地球科学进展,2004,19(2):173-181
曾允孚,刘文均,陈洪德,等.华南右江盆地的沉积构造演化[J].地质学报,1995,69(2):113-123
曾允孚、夏文杰.沉积岩石学[M],地质出版社,1986,1-274.
张遴信,王志浩,周建平.中国上石炭统滑石板阶[J].地层学杂志,2002,28(1):18-26
张世红,王训练,朱鸿.碳酸盐岩磁化率与相对海平面变化的关系——黔南泥盆-石炭系例析[J].中国科学(D籍),1999,29(1):558-566
周明辉,麻建明,郑冰.滇黔桂海相油气成藏条件及勘探潜力分析[J].石油石油地质,2005,27(4):333-337
朱红涛,LIU Ke-yu,杜远生,等.层序地层学模拟研究进展及趋势[J].地质科技情报,2007,26(5):27-34
邹元荣,金晓辉,闫相宾.塔河油田三叠系层序地层与沉积相研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然学科版),2008,23(5):11-14
C. J. R. Braithwaite. Cement sequence stratigraphy in carbonates[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research; March 1993; v. 63; no. 2; p. 295-303
Peters K E. A new geochmical-sequence stratigraphic model for the Mahakam Delta and Makassar Slope, Kalimantan, Indonesia[J]. AAPG Bulletin; January 2000; v. 84; no. 1; p. 12-44
Bohacs K M. Lake-basin type, source potential, and hydrocarbon character: an integrated sequence- stratigraphic-geochemical framework[J].AAPG Studies in Geology 46, pp. 3–33
Galloway. W. E. Genetic stratigraphy sequence in basin analysisⅠ: Architecture and genesis o f flooding suface bounded depositional units[J] AAPG Bulletin ,1989,73:125-142
Johnson. J. H, Klaper G. North American midcontinent Devonian T-R cycles[J] Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 1992,145:127-135
P. Courville , P.Y. Collin. Taphonomic sequences—A new tool for sequence stratigraphy [J]. GEOLOGY, June 2002:511-514
Daniel J. Lehrmann, Jiayong Wei, Paul Enos. Controls on facies architecture of a large triassic carbonate platform: the great bank of guizhou,nanpanjiang basin, south China [j]. Journal of sedimentary research, vol. 68, no. 2, march, 1998, p. 311–326
Jonathan l. Payne,Daniel J. Lehrmann,Shannon Christensen. Environmental and biological controls on the initiation and growth of a middle triassic (anisian) reef complex on the great bank of Guizhou,Guizhou province, China[j]. . Palaios, 2006, v. 21, p. 325–343
M. Menning, A.S. Alekseev, B.I. Chuvashov,etc. Global time scale and regional stratigraphic reference scales of Central and West Europe,East Europe,Tethys,South China, and North America as used in the Devonian–Carboniferous–Permian Correlation Chart 2003 (DCP 2003) [J]. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology 240 (2006) 318–372
Stephen G. Peters,Huang Jiazhan,Li Zhiping, etc. Sedimentary rock-hosted Au deposits of the Dian–Qian–Gui area,Guizhou,and Yunnan Provinces,and GuangxiDistrict,China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews 31 (2007) 170–204
Brian P. Coffey, J. Fred Read. Mixed carbonate–siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy of a Paleogene transition zone continental shelf, southeastern USA[J]. Sedimentary Geology 166 (2004) 21–57
Catuneanu, V. Abreu, J.P. Bhattacharya ,etc. Towards the standardization of sequence stratigraphy [J]. Earth-Science Reviews,92 (2009): 1–33
J.L.威尔逊著,冯增昭等译地质历史中的碳酸盐相[M].北京:地质出版社,1981.3
陈宏明,吴祥和,张瑛,李耀西,文琼英等著.中国南方石炭纪岩相古地理与成矿作用[M].北京:地质出版社,1994,13-33
陈洪德,侯明才,刘文均,等.海西—印支期中国南方的盆地演化与层序格架[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(6):629-635
陈洪德,刘文均,郑荣才,等.层序地层学理论和研究方法[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1994.
陈洪德,倪新锋,田景春,等.华南海相下组合层序地层格架与油气勘探[J].石油与天然气地质,2006(03):370-377.
陈洪德,彭军,田景春,等.上扬子克拉通南缘中泥盆统—石炭系高频层序及复合海平面变化[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):181-189
陈洪德,彭军,田景春等.上扬子克拉通南缘中泥盆统-石炭系高频层序及复合海平面变化[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):181-189
陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春等.右江盆地层序格架中的生储盖组合特征及勘探意义[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):215-220.
陈洪德,田景春,刘文均,等.中国南方海相震旦系一中三叠统层序划分与对比[J].成都理工大学学报,2002,29(4):354-379
陈洪德,张锦全,刘文均.泥盆纪—石炭纪右江盆地结构与岩相古地理演化[J].广西地质, 1994,7(2):15-23.
陈洪德.广西丹池晚古生代沉积盆地的演化及控矿作用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),1988,15(4):69-78
陈洪德,曾允孚,李孝全.丹池晚古生代盆地的沉积和构造演化[J].沉积学报,1989,7(4):85-96
池秋鄂,龚福华.层序地层学基础与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001
滇黔桂石油地质志编写组.滇黔桂油气区中国石油地质志卷十一[M].北京:石油工业出版社1992
方少仙,侯方浩,董兆雄,等.白云石化作用及黔桂地区泥盆系——石炭系层(块)状白云岩的成因[J].低渗透油气田,2007,12(3):1-10
方少仙,侯方浩,董兆雄.黔桂泥盆、石炭系白云岩的形成模式[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(1):34-38
冯增昭,杨玉卿,鲍志东.中国南方石炭纪岩相古地理[J].古地理学报,1999,1(1):75-85
付志方,王焕弟,邢卫新,等.层序地层学研究现状及进展[J].勘探地球物理进展,2005,28(5):321-328
顾家裕,张兴阳.油气沉积学发展回顾和应用现状[J].沉积学报,2003,21(1):137-141
广西壮族自治区地质矿产局.广西壮族自治区区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1985.
贵州省地质矿产局.贵州省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.
郭岭,王丽丹,郭峰,等.桂中坳陷中泥盆统纳标组层序地层与岩相古地理研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报) 2009,31(2):211-214
侯明才,陈洪德,田景春.层序充填动力学——层序地层研究的新方向[J].地层学杂志,2003,27(4):358-364
侯明才.右江盆地层序充填动力学[D].成都:成都理工大学沉积地质研究院,2003.
侯中健,陈洪德,田景春,等.层序岩相古地理编图在岩相古地理分析中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2001,28(4):377-382
侯中健,陈洪德,田景春,等.右江盆地海相泥盆系-中三叠统层序界面成因类型与盆地演化[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):205-209
黄启勋.广西若干重大基础地质特征[J].广西地质,2000,13(3):3-12
黄思静,麻建明,冷德勋.广西钦州石炭—二叠纪深海硅质岩的锶同位素组成及其地质意义[J].沉积学报:1999,17(4):542-546
贾承造,刘德来,赵文智.层序地层学研究新进展[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(5):1-4
姜建军.黔南早石炭世牙行石及泥盆-石炭系分界线[J].中国区域地质,1994,1:21-27
蒋维红,董春梅,闫家宁.岩相古地理学研究现状及发展趋势[J].断块油气田,2007,14(3):1-3
焦大庆,马永生,邓军,等.黔桂地区石炭纪层序地层格架及古地理演化[J].现代地质,2003,17(3):294-320
康建威.黔南-桂中地区泥盆系层序地层及其格架中的储集体特征研究[D].成都:成都理工大学沉积地质研究院,2008
李浩.滇黔桂地区加里东构造古地理变迁及油气勘探潜力分析[D].中国地质大学(北京),2005
林小兵,李国忠,田景春,等.黔南石炭系层序地层格架中碳酸盐岩成岩作用研究[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版):2007,34(3):267-272
刘宝珺,韩作振,杨仁超.当代沉积学研究进展、前瞻与思考[J].特种油气藏,2006,13(5):1-5
刘宝珺、余光明.岩相古地理学教程[M],成都:地质矿产部岩相古地理工作协作组,1990.
刘宝珺、曾允孚.岩相古地理基础和工作方法[M],北京:地质出版社,1985.
刘宝珺.沉积岩石学[M],北京:地质出版社,1986.
刘鸿允.中国古地理图[M].北京:科学出版社,1959.
刘文均.海西—印支期华南板块的沉积特点[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),1998,25(2):328-336
刘文均,曾允孚,张锦泉,陈洪德,郑荣才.右江盆地火山岩的地球化学特点及其构造环境[J].广西地质,1993,6(2):1-12
马永生,陈洪德,王国力等.中国南方层序地层与古地理[M].北京:科学出版社,2009
梅冥相,李仲远.滇黔桂地区晚古生代至三叠纪层序地层序列及沉积盆地演化[J].现代地质,2004,18(4):555-562
梅冥相,马永生,邓军,等.滇黔桂盆地及其邻区石炭纪至二叠纪层序地层格架及三级海平面变化的全球对比[J].中国地质,2005,32(1):13-24
梅冥相,马永生,邓军,等.加里东运动构造古地理及滇黔桂盆地的形成——兼论滇黔桂盆地深层油气勘探潜力[J].地学前缘,2005,12(3):227-235
梅冥相,马永生,高金汉,等.滇黔桂盆地及其邻区晚古生代层序地层格架及相对海平面变化[J].现代地质,2002,16(4):365-373
梅冥相,孟庆芬,定红,等.黔桂地区石炭系层序地层格架及海平面变化[J].地球学报,2004,24((1):39-46
梅冥相,曾萍,初汉明,等.滇黔桂盆地及邻区泥盆纪层序地层格架及其古地理背景[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(4):546-554
牟传龙,许效松,林明.层序地层与岩相古地理编图——以中国南方泥盆纪地层为例[J].岩相古地理,1992,(4):1-9
牛新生,徐立明,等.贵州紫云运动与泥盆纪末华南板块海退事件的因果关系研究[J].华南地质与矿产,2007,1:48-50
彭军,陈洪德,田景春,等.川滇黔桂地区石炭系层序地层研究[J].沉积学报,2006,18(2):192-197
彭军,陈景山,陈洪德,等.黔桂地区石炭纪I型层序界面沉积记录及成因分析[J].地球学报,2000,21(4):433-439
孙枢.中国沉积学的今后发展:若干思考与建议[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京;北京大学),2005,12(2):3-10
孙肇才,郭正吾.中国南方古-中生界海相油气勘探研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1993.
覃建雄,陈洪德,田景春等.右江盆地层序充填序列与古特提斯海再造[J].地球学报, 2000,21(1):62-70.
覃建雄.层序地层学发展的若干重要方向[J].岩相古地理,1997, 17(2):63-70
田景春,陈洪德,彭军,等.川滇黔桂地区下、中三叠统层序划分、对比及层序地层格架[J].沉积学报,2006,18(2):198-204
田景春,陈洪德,覃建雄,等.层序-岩相古地理图及其编制[J].地球科学与环境学报,2004,26(1):6-12
田景春,陈洪德,覃建雄,等.层序底界面的物质表现形式-以中国南方海相震旦系-中三叠统为例[J].沉积学报,2003,21(4):675-680
田景春,康建威,林小兵,等.台盆沉积体系及层序地层特征研究[J].西南石油大学学报,2007,29(6):39-42
王约.贵州独山石炭系露头层序地层学研究[J].贵州地质,2001,18(4):217-223
夏文臣,雷建喜,周杰,等.黔桂地区海西-印支阶段的构造古地理演化及沉积盆地的时空组合[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1991,16(5):477-488
夏文臣,周杰,雷建喜,等.滇黔桂晚海西—中印支伸展裂谷海盆地的演化[J].地质学报,1995,69(2):97-442
许中杰,刘万洙,白雪峰,等.黔南、黔北及南盘江坳陷古生代碳酸盐岩储层特征[J].世界地质,2007,26(2):224-228
杨国臣,于炳松.层序地层学的发展现状及其学科地位与研究前沿[J].石油地质与工程,2009,23(2):1-4
杨明慧.湘桂早海西期构造层序地层与板内构造运动[J].湖南地质,1998,17(1):14-18
殷保安.广西壮族自治区岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997.
殷科华,叶德书,沈大兴,等.息烽—遵义早石炭世大塘期岩相古地理特征[J].沉积学报,2009,27(4):606-613
于兴河,郑秀娟.沉积学的发展历程与未来展望[J].地球科学进展,2004,19(2):173-181
曾允孚,刘文均,陈洪德,等.华南右江盆地的沉积构造演化[J].地质学报,1995,69(2):113-123
曾允孚、夏文杰.沉积岩石学[M],地质出版社,1986,1-274.
张遴信,王志浩,周建平.中国上石炭统滑石板阶[J].地层学杂志,2002,28(1):18-26
张世红,王训练,朱鸿.碳酸盐岩磁化率与相对海平面变化的关系——黔南泥盆-石炭系例析[J].中国科学(D籍),1999,29(1):558-566
周明辉,麻建明,郑冰.滇黔桂海相油气成藏条件及勘探潜力分析[J].石油石油地质,2005,27(4):333-337
朱红涛,LIU Ke-yu,杜远生,等.层序地层学模拟研究进展及趋势[J].地质科技情报,2007,26(5):27-34
邹元荣,金晓辉,闫相宾.塔河油田三叠系层序地层与沉积相研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然学科版),2008,23(5):11-14