认知视角下创业意向影响机制
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着我国产业结构调整及社会就业问题的日益突出,国家及各地方政府都在积极营造创业氛围,并纷纷出台区域创业政策及相关鼓励措施,旨在通过创业活动来帮助解决经济发展过程中遇到的诸多问题。同时,基于以往创业个体研究发现,创业活动很难被诸如创业环境或者个体特质等变量所解释并预测,并缺乏稳定统一的研究框架;而认知视角则能够将创业者及创业活动结合起来并提供成熟而稳定的理论研究基础。因此基于认知视角并结合创业活动来深入分析个体创业意向的影响机制,具有非常重要的现实及理论研究意义。
     本研究首先通过梳理以往创业认知研究成果,将个体创业认知研究从认知内容和认知模式两个方面进行阐述。为了更好地结合创业活动来分析个人创业认知对创业意向的影响,本研究借鉴原型理论提出了“创业机会原型”来使创业认知内容研究具体化和深入化;同时基于以往研究提出两种典型的创业认知偏差,即创业效能感和控制错觉,来表示个体创业认知模式。以往研究表明,创业意向是可以有效解释并预测个体创业行为的研究变量,因此本研究旨在结合创业活动关键环节——机会识别来分析个体创业机会原型、创业效能感和控制错觉对于其创业意向的影响机制,并进一步考察区域创业政策对此影响机制的调节作用。
     通过对以往研究理论回顾、案例访谈及对比分析和问卷调查及统计分析,本研究得出三个重要研究结论:创业机会原型作为个体识别机会关键特征的重要认知框架,能够显著促进个体发现潜在机会并提高其创业意向;创业效能感和控制错觉能够帮助创业者以特定范式来简化对潜在机会信息的加工和决策过程,并通过显著提高对潜在机会的识别水平来进一步影响个体创业意向;而良好的区域创业政策能够显著提高人们对机会的识别水平和创业意向,并且在创业效能感与机会识别之间发挥调节作用。
As industrial structure and unemployment problems have become increasingly severe, state and local governments are proactive to introduce series of encouraging policies and incentive measures, aimed to stimulate entrepreneurial activities to add new engine for the development of national economy. At the same time, according to previous study on entrepreneurs, we can find that there is no one stable and unified research framework to explain and predict entrepreneurial activity. However, Cognitive perspective can provide us with a basic and consistent research theory to analyze the mechanism between individual's cognitive factors and their entrepreneurial behaviors. Therefore, the in-depth research based on cognition perspective is of important practical and theoretical significance.
     Firstly, this study has reviewed the previous study works on entrepreneurs' traits and relevant entrepreneurial cognition research; and decided to divide entrepreneurs' cognition into two aspects: cognitive content and cognitive style. In order to explore the influence of cognitive factors on individual's entrepreneurial intention, this study has proposed an innovative construct, Entrepreneurial opportunity prototype, which reflects the individuals' cognitive framework relevant to key features of potential opportunity. And this notion can make the research in-depth through combining opportunity recognition, which is a basic and critical step of entrepreneurial activities. Secondly, this study has introduced two kinds of distinct cognitive bias, Entrepreneurial efficacy and Illusion of Control, as the cognitive style of entrepreneurs. Thirdly, this study has selected Entrepreneurial Intention as the indicator to explain and predict entrepreneurial behaviors. And the main research task is to explore the relationship between Entrepreneurial opportunity prototype, Entrepreneurial efficacy and Illusion of Control and Entrepreneurial Intention through Opportunity recognition. What's more, this study will further to explore the role of entrepreneurial policy in above mechanism.
     Through study review, case analysis and empirical study, this study obtained major findings: entrepreneurial opportunity prototype, entrepreneurial efficacy and Illusion of control can significantly promote the individual to identify potential opportunities and improve their entrepreneurial intention; Positive regional entrepreneurship policy can significantly improve opportunity recognition and entrepreneurial intentions, and moderate the relationship between entrepreneurial efficacy and opportunity identification.
引文
[1]. Ajzen, I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl, J., Bachmann, J. Action-control: From Cognition to Behavior. Springer, Heidelberg, 1985,11-39.
    [2]. Ajzen, I. Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991,50:179-221.
    [3]. Ajzen, I. Nature and operation of attitude. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001, 52: 27-58.
    [4]. Anderson, J. R. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. San Francisco: Freeman, 1980.
    [5]. Ardichvili, A. & Cardozo, R. A model of the entrepreneurial opportunity recognition process. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 2000, 8(2): 103-119.
    [6]. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R. & Ray, S. A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of business venturing, 2003, 18(1): 105-123.
    [7]. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977, 84: 91-215.
    [8]. Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1986.
    [9]. Barbosa, S. D. & Gerhardt, M.G., Kickul, J. R. The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2007, 13 (4): 86-104.
    [10]. Baron, R.A. Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 1998, 13:275-294.
    [11]. Baron, R. A. Counterfactual thinking and venture formation: The potential effects of thinking about "what might have been". Journal of Business Venturing, 1999, 15: 79-91.
    [12]. Baron, R. A. & Markman, G. D. Person-entrepreneurship fit: the role of individual difference factors in new venture formation. Journal of Business Venturing, 2003, 18(1): 41-60.
    [13]. Baron, R. A. & Ward, T. B. Expanding entrepreneurial cognition's toolbox: Potential contributions from the field of cognitive science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2004, 28 (6): 553-575.
    [14]. Baron, R. A. The cognitive perspective: a valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic "why" questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 2004, 19(2): 221-239.
    [15]. Baron, R. A. Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs "connect the dots" to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspective, 2006,2: 104-119.
    [16]. Baron, R. A. Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: evidence from comparison of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 2006, 52(9): 1331-1344.
    [17]. Baron, R. A. Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: entrepreneurs as the active element in the new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2007,1: 167-182.
    [18]. Bartholomew, S. National system of Biotechnology innovation: Complex independence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies, 1997, 241-266.
    [19]. Bird, B., Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention. Academic Management Review, 1988, 13:442-453.
    [20]. Bird, B., The operation of intentions in time: the emergence of the new venture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1992,17:11-20.
    [21]. Boyd, N. G, Vozikis, G S., The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 1994, 18: 63-77.
    [22]. Brockhaus, R.H. Risk-Taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23 (3): 509-520.
    [23]. Bygrave, W. D. The entrepreneurship paradigm: A Philosophical look at its research methodologies. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 1989.14(1), 7-26.
    [24]. Busenitz, L. W. Research on Entrepreneurial Alertness: Sampling, Measurement, and Theoretical Issues. Journal of Small Business Management, 1996, 34 (4): 35 - 44.
    [25]. Busenitz, L. W. & Lau, C. A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1996, 20(4), 25-39.
    [26]. Busenitz, L. W. & Barney, J. B. Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making: Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations. Journal of Business Venturing, 1997.12: 9-30.
    [27]. Busenitz, L. W., Gomez Carolina & Spencer J.W. Country institutional profiles: unlocking entrepreneurial phenomenon. Academy of management Journal, Oct 2000, 43(5): 994-1003.
    [28]. Busenitz, L. W. & West, et al. Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management. 2003.
    [29]. Campbell, C.A., A decision theory model for entrepreneurial acts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1992.17(1): 21-27.
    [30]. Carsrud, A.L. Opportunity recognition and revenue generation in electronic commerce perspectives of regulators and trade negotiators. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College [DB/OL]. http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers99/X/X_P1 /X_P1%20 Text.htm.
    [31]. Casson, M. Enterprise and Competitiveness. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
    [32]. Chandler, G N., Davidsson, P. & Dahlqvist, J. Opportunity recognition processes: Taxonomy and outcome implications. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College [DBIOL]. http://www.babson.edu/entrep/ferBABSON2002/1I/II P1/II Pl.htm.
    [33]. Chen, C. C, Greene, P.G, Crick, A. Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 1998.13:295-316.
    [34]. Choi, Y. R. & Shepherd, D. A. Entrepreneurs' decision to exploit opportunity. Journal of Management, 2004, 30(3): 377-395.
    [35]. Choi, Y. R., Levesque, M., Shepherd, D. A. When should entrepreneurs expedite or delay opportunity exploitation?. Journal of Business Venture, 2008, 23(3): 333-355.
    [36]. Collins & Moore. The Enterprising Man. East Lansing: Michigan State University, 1964.
    [37]. Collins, Jock. Cultural diversity and entrepreneurship: policy responses to immigrant entrepreneurs in Australia. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2003, 15: 142.
    [38]. Corner P. D., Kinicki A J., Keats B W. Integrating Organizational and Individual Information Processing Perspectives on Choice. Organization Science, 1994. 5: 294-307.
    [39]. Cooper, A. C, Woo, C. Y. & Dunkelberg, W. C. Entrepreneurs' perceived chance of success. Journal of Business Venturing, 1988, 3 (1): 97 - 108.
    [40]. Crant, J. M. The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management. 1996, 34:42-49.
    [41]. Degadt, J. For a More Effective Entrepreneurship Policy: Perception and Feedback as Preconditions, Research Center for Entrepreneurship, Rencontres de Saint-Gall, 2004: 8-10.
    [42]. De Noble, A., Jung D. & Ehrlich, S. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: The development of a measure and its relationship to Entrepreneurial action. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Waltham, MA: P & R Publication Inc., 1999:73-78.
    [43]. Duhaime, I. M., Schwenk, C. R. Conjectures on Cognitive Simplification in Acquisition and Divestment Decision Making. Academy of Management Review, 1985,10 (2): 287-295.
    [44]. Dutton, J. The making of organizational opportunity: interpretive pathway to organizational change. In Staw, B. & Cummings, L. (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior, Greebwich: JAL, 1993, 195-226.
    [45]. Forbes, D. P. The effects of strategic decision making on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2005, 29 (5): 599 - 626.
    [46]. Gaglio, C. M., Katz J. A. The Psychological Basis of Opportunity Identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness. Small Business Economics, 2001, 16 (2): 95 - 111.
    [47]. Gaglio, C. M. The role of mental simulations and counterfactual thinking in the opportunity identification process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2004, 28(6): 533-552.
    [48]. Gartner, W. B. A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation. Academy of Management Review, 1985,10(4): 696-706.
    [49]. Gartner, W. B. Who is entrepreneur? Is the wrong question? American Journal of Small Business, 1988, 12(4). 11-31.
    [50]. Habel, S., Reichel. A. The cumulative nature of the entrepreneurial Process: The contribution of human capital, planning and environment resources to small venture performance. Journal of Business venturing, 2007,119:145.
    [51]. Hart, D. M., The mergence of entrepreneurship policy: Governance, Start-ups, and Growth in the US Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    [52]. Higgins, E. T. Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 2000, 55(11):1217-1230.
    [53]. Hills, G E., Lumpkin, G T. & Singly R. P. Opportunity recognition: perception and behaviors of entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College [DB/OL]. http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers97/hills/hilll.htm.
    [54]. Hisrich, R. R. & Peters, M. P. Entrepreneurship: Starting, Developing and Managing a New Enterprise. Boston, Mass: Irwin, 1992.
    [55]. Hisrich, R. D. & Brush, C. G. The Woman Entrepreneur: Starting, Managing, and Financing a Successful New Business. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1986.
    [56]. Jenkins, M., Johnson, G Entrepreneurial intentions and outcomes: a comparative causal mapping study. Journal of Management Study, 1997.34: 895-920.
    [57]. Kaish, S., Gilad, B. Characteristics of Opportunities Search of Entrepreneurs versus Executives: Resources, Interest, and General Alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 1991, 6(1): 45-61.
    [58]. Katz, J., Gartner, W. Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review. 1988, 13:29-441.
    [59]. Katz, J. A. A psychosocial cognitive model of employment. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1992,17(1): 29-38.
    [60]. Kayne, Jay. State Entrepreneurship Policies and Programs. Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leader at the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, 1999.
    [61]. Keh, H. T., Foo, M. D. &Lim, B. C., Opportunity Evaluation under risk condition: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2002, 26 (4): 125-148.
    [62]. Keil, M., Depledge, G, Rai, A. Escalation: The role of problem recognition and cognitive bias. Decision Sciences, 2007, 38(3), 391-421.
    [63]. Kirzner, I. Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
    [64]. Kirzner, I. Perception, Opportunity, and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1979.
    [65]. Kirzner, I. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. The Journal of International Literature, 1997, 35: 60-85.
    [66]. Kostova, T. Country institutional profile: Concept and Measurement. Academy of Management best paper proceedings, 1997, 180-189.
    [67]. Krueger, N., The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1993.18, 5-21.
    [68]. Krueger, N.F & Carsrud, A. L., Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1993.5:315-330.
    [69]. Krueger, N. J. & Dickson, P. R. How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 1994. 385-400.
    [70]. Krueger, N.F & Carsrud, A. L., Competing models of entrepreneurship intentions. Journal of BusinessVenturing.2000. 15, 411-432.
    [71]. Krueger, N. F., Brazeal, D.V. Entrepreneurship potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1994, 18 (3): 91-104.
    [72]. Langer, E.J. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32(2):311-328.
    [73]. Langer, E, J., J. Roth. Heads I win, tails its chance: the elusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32: 951-955.
    [74]. Larsen, A. & Bundesen, C. A. Template-matching pandemonium recognizes unconstrained handwritten characters with high accuracy. Memory and Cognition, 1996,24(2): 136-143.
    [75]. Lowell W Busenitz, Carolina Gomez, Jennifer W Spencer. Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal; Oct 2000.
    [76]. Luthje, C., & Franke, N. The making of an entrepreneur: testing a model of entrepreneurial intention among engineering students at MIT. R & D Management, 2003, 33(2), 135-147.
    [77]. Marcin, E. R., Cockrum, D. L. A psychological comparison of entrepreneurs and small business managers in the United States, West Germany and Mexico in respect to achievement, power, affiliation motivation as well as locus of control. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Small Business Conference, 1984.
    [78]. Macro van Gelderen, Maryse, B., et al. Research working paper series. Department of Management and International business, 2006, (2): 1176-2611.
    [79]. Markman, G. D., Balkin, D. B. & Baron, R. A. Inventors' cognitive mechanisms as predictors of new venture formation. Paper presented at the meetings of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC. 2001.
    [80]. Markman G. D., Baron R.A. Person-Entrepreneurship fit: why some people are more successful as entrepreneurs than others. Human Resource Management Review, 2003, 13:281-301.
    [81]. Matlin, M.W. Cognition, 5th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers; Matlin, M.W., Foley, H. J. Sensation and perception. 1997. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. 2002.
    
    [82]. Matlin, M. W. Cognition, 6th ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2005.
    [83]. McClelland, D. C. Need achievement an entrepreneurship: longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 389-392.
    [84]. McClelland, D.C. The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand. 1961.
    [85]. Morris M. H., Lewis, P., and Sexton, D. L., Re-conceptualizing Entrepreneurship: An Input-Output Perspective. Advanced Management Journal 1994: 5-30.
    [86]. Mitchell, R. K., & Busentiz, L. W. Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 2002. 27, 93-104.
    [87]. Mitchell, R. K., and Mitchell, J. R., Smith J. B. Inside opportunity formation: enterprise failure, cognition and the creation of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2008, 2: 225-242.
    [88]. Morris, M. H. Re-conceptualizing entrepreneurship: An input-output perspective. Advanced Management Journal; winter 1994; 59(1): 21-31.
    [89]. OECD, Entrepreneurship and Local Economic Development: Program and Policy Recommendations, 2003.
    [90]. Olm K..W. & Wddy G G Entrepreneurship and Venture Management: Text and Cases. Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company, 1987.
    [91]. Oviatt, B. M. and P. P. McDougall. Toward a Theory of International New Venture. Journal of International Business Studies, 1994, 45-64.
    [92]. Phan, P. H., Wong, P. K. & Wang, C. K. Antecedents to entrepreneurship among university students in Singapore: believes, attitudes and background. Journal of enterprising Culture, 2002, 10(2): 151-174.
    [93]. Rotter, J. B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1966, 80(1):609-623.
    [94]. Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., Venkataraman, S. Three Views of Entrepreneurial Opportunity. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, 2003, 141-160.
    [95]. Scherer, R. F., Adams, J. S, Carley, S. S, Wiebe F. A. Role Model Performance Effects on Development of Entrepreneurial Career Preference. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1989, 13 (3): 53-72.
    [96]. Schumpeter, J. A. The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.
    [97]. Shane, S., Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 2000. 25: 217 - 226.
    [98]. Shane, S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 2000, 11: 448-469.
    [99]. Shane, S. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship. The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. 2003.
    [100]. Shane, S. A. & Eckhardt, J. T. Opportunities and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 2003,29(3): 336-349.
    [101]. Shane, S., Locke, A. E. & Collins, J. C. Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 2003,13:257-279.
    [102]. Shapero, A. Social dimensions of Entrepreneurship. In C. Kent, D. Sexton and K. Vesper (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1982:72-90.
    [103]. Shaver, K., Scott, L. Person. Process and Choice: The psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1992, 16: 23-45.
    [104]. Shepherd, D. A. & DeTienne, D. R. Prior Knowledge, potential financial reward, and opportunity identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2005, 29(1): 91-112.
    [105]. Simon, H.A. Information processing models of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology. 1979, 30: 363-396.
    [106]. Simon, H. A. Making management decisions: the role of intuition and emotion, In: Kelly, J., Prince, J.B., Asfort, B. (Eds.), Organizational Behavior, 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, New-Jersey, 1991,14-324.
    [107]. Simon, M., Houghton, S.M., Aquino, K. Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 2000. 14(5), 113-134.
    [108]. Smith, K.G, Gannon, M.J., Grimm, C, Mitchell, T.R. Decision-making behavior in smaller entrepreneurial and larger professionally managed firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 1988,3:223-232.
    [109]. Stajkovic, A. D. & Luthans, F. Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, 124: 240-261.
    [110]. Stevenson, H., Jarillo J. C. A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 1990, 11:17-27.
    [111]. Stevenson, Lois, Lundstrom, A. Entrepreneurship Policy for the Future. Swedish Foundation for Small Business Research, 2001, (1): 45.
    [112]. Stevenson, Lois and Lundstrom, Anders, Patterns and Trends in Entrepreneurship /SME Policy and Practice in Ten Economies, Entrepreneurship Policy for the Future. Foundation for Small BusinessResearch. 2001, (3): 28.
    
    [113]. Storey, D. L. Understanding the small business sector. Lundon: Routledge, 1994.
    [114]. Teece, D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 1986, 15: 285-306.
    [115]. Timmons, J. A. New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century, The McGraw-Hill,1999.
    [116].Ucbasaran,D.,Westhead,P.,Wright,M.The Focus of Entrepreneurial Research:Contextual and Process Issues.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2001,26(2):57-80.
    [117].Venkataraman,S.The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research,Advances in Entrepreneurship Research.Firm emergence and growth,1997,3:119-138.
    [118].Westhead,P.,Ucbasaran,D.& Wright,M.Decisions,actions,and performance:Do novice,serial,and portfolio Entrepreneurs Differ? Journal of Small Business Management,2005,43(4):393-417.
    [119].Westhead,P.,M.Wright.Novice,portfolio and serial founders:Are they different?.Journal of Business Venturing,1998,Vol.13,No.3,173-204.
    [120].Wilken,P.H.Entreprenurship:A comparative and historical study.Norwood,NJ:Ablex.1979.
    [121].陈海涛、蔡莉.创业机会特征维度划分的实证研究.工业技术经济,2008,27:82-86.
    [122].德鲁克·彼得,萧富峰、李田树(译).创新与创业精神.台北:麦田出版,1995.
    [123].高建,盖罗它.国外创业政策的理论研究综述.国外社会科学,2007(1):70-74.
    [124].高建等主编,中国城市创业观察报告.北京:清华大学出版社,2007.9.
    [125].何斌,王重鸣.创业策略、创业认知与创业绩效关系研究.硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2004.
    [126].侯杰泰,温忠麟等.结构方程模型及其应用,第1版.北京:教育科学出版社,2004:5-178.
    [127].黄芳铭.结构方程模式理论与应用.北京:中国税务出版社,2005:248-269
    [128].蒋永福,刘敬茹.认知图式与信息接受.图书馆建设,1999,(3):2-3.
    [129].姜红玲、王重鸣、倪宁.基于因子分析的创业特质探索研究.心理科学,2006,29(4):919-921.
    [130].乐安国.图式理论对社会心理学研究的影响.江西师范大学学报,2004,37:19-25.
    [131].林嵩、姜彦福、张帏.创业机会识别:概念、过程、影响因素及分析框架.科学学与科学技术管理,2005,6:128-132.
    [132].林嵩、姜彦福.基于创业机会特征的新创企业竞争性行为研究.科研管理,2008,1(29):48-52.
    [133].刘振华.创业者特质对新创企业绩效的影响研究.硕士学位论文,吉林大学,2004.
    [134].马庆国.管理统计[M].科学出版社,2005:261-327.
    [135].苗青,基于认知观的创业过程研究.心理科学,2005,28(5):1274-1276.
    [136].苗青,基于规则聚焦的公司创业机会识别与决策机制研究.博士学位论文.浙江大学,2006.
    [137].马昆姝,胡培,覃蓉芳.创业效能感研究综述.外国经济与管理,2008,12(30):59-54.
    [138].约翰·马林斯著,石建峰(译).创业测试-企业家及经理人在制定商业计划前应该做些什么.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
    [139].钱永红,王重鸣.女企业家创业意向缓冲因素探究.技术经济,2007,26:5-10.
    [140].任旭林,王重鸣.基于认知观的创业机会评价研究.科研管理,2007,28(2):15-18.
    [141].唐靖,张炜,高建.不同创业环境下的机会认知和创业决策研究.科学学研究,2007,25(2):328-333.
    [142].郁义鸿,李志能(译),Robert D.Hishrich.创业学,复旦大学出版社,2000.
    [143].王重鸣,心理学研究方法.北京:人民教育出版社,1990.
    [144].王重鸣,管理心理学.浙江:浙江教育出版社,2000.
    [145].温忠麟,侯杰泰和张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用.心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274.
    [146].吴金希,于永达.浅议管理研究中的案例研究方法--特点、方法设计与有效性讨论.科学学研究,2004(22):105-111.
    [147].吴京生.我国高薪技术创业政策与结构研究.科技进步与对策,2007,24(9):5-10.
    [148].颜士梅,王重鸣.创业的机会观点:存在、结构和构造思路.软科学,2008,22:1-3.
    [149].张文彤著.SPSS11统计分析教程.北京:北京希望电子出版社,2002.
    [150].张钢,牛志江.基于生命周期视角的区域政策关键因素探究.科学学与科学技术管理,2009(5):68-72.
    [151].郑海航.新创企业改革中的新创企业家队伍建设研究.硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2004.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700