圆弧倒角型隔板贯通节点试验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
方钢管混凝土框架结构体系中,隔板贯通式连接已经被我国规程列为梁柱连接的推荐形式。但由于国内有关隔板贯通节点的研究资料较少,规程和规程中也未给出节点的计算理论与设计方法,在一定程度上制约了其在工程中的应用。
     为配合方钢管混凝土结构的推广和相关设计规程的推出,本文在介绍了方钢管混凝土柱与H型钢梁的刚接节点形式和研究现状的基础上,对圆弧倒角型隔板贯通节点的力学性能进行了试验研究。
     基于日本规程提出的隔板贯通节点静力拉伸承载力理论,对十一个节点模型试件的静力拉伸试验,研究了方钢管混凝土柱与钢梁翼缘连接的结构性能。介绍了各试件的破坏过程及特征,分析了节点域的应力传递机制,并对节点承载力实测值和理论计算值进行了比较分析。研究结果表明,圆弧倒角型隔板贯通式节点梁翼缘受拉模型具有较高的承载力和良好的延性,在钢管中填充混凝土有利于提高节点的屈服承载力和刚度,理论计算公式对于填充混凝土的试件偏于保守,但却高估了空钢管试件的承载力。
     为研究隔板贯通节点的抗震性能,本文对四个十字型足尺试件进行了拟静力试验,介绍了各试件的破坏过程及特征,然后根据实测的滞回曲线,对节点的承载力、延性、耗能能力、刚度退化等抗震性能指标进行了详细的比较分析。研究结果表明,隔板贯通节点具有较好的延性和较强的耗能能力;钢梁翼缘与隔板的连接构造对节点的延性、耗能能力、刚度退化影响较大,圆弧倒角型节点比侧板加强型节点具有更好的抗震性能。
In frame structures with concrete-filled square steel tubular members, diaphragm-through joint has been regard as recommended type in technical specification of our country. However, because studies on diaphragm-through joints are very limited, calculating theory and design method are not well developed in the corresponding codes and regulations, which restrict its practice in the project.
     To coordinate the promotion of concrete-filled square steel tubular column structure and the implementation of new design code, this paper summarizes joint types of moment resisting connections between concrete-filled square steel tubular column and steel beam, and simply introduces the present research of rigid joints. On the basis of above investigation, experimental study on cicrcular fillet diaphragm-through joints is carried out to understand its mechanical property.
     Based on the tensile load-bearing capability theory of diaphragm-through joint presented in specification of Japan, eleven specimens of the joint model are studied by static tensile test to investigate the structure behavior of the connection between concrete-filled square steel tubular column and steel beam flange. The failure process and feature of each specimen are described and the stress transfer mechanism in the connection zone is analyzed. Then comparing analysis is executed on the measured value and the calculated value of bearing capacity of this joint. Research results suggest that cicrcular fillet diaphragm-through joint model has high capacity and good ductility and that the yield capacity and stiffness can be increased by the concrete filled in the tube. Load-bearing capability calculated from the theoretical formula is conservative for the specimens with the tube filled in concrete, but overly estimates the strength of the specimens without concrete.
     In order to study the seismic performance of diaphragm-through joint, four full-scale cruciform specimens are studied under quasi-static test. The failure process and feature of each specimen are described. Based on the measured hysteresis loops, this paper makes a thorough comparing analysis on the index of seismic behavior such as load-carrying capacity of the joint, ductility, energy dissipation, and rigidity degeneration. The analysis results show specimens of diaphragm-through joint have good ductility and enough energy dissipation capacity. Details of the steel beam flange with the diaphragm have obvious effect on the ductility, energy dissipation and rigidity degeneration, and the seismic performance of joint of circular fillet type are better than those reinforced by taper plate welded to the beam flanges and diaphragm.
引文
[1]钟善桐,钢管混凝土结构,北京:清华大学出版社,2003.
    [2]蔡绍怀.现代钢管混凝土结构.北京:人民交通出版社,2003.
    [3]韩林海.钢管混凝土结构.北京:科学出版社,2000.
    [4]Gerstle K. H. Effect of Connections on Frames [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,10, 1988, 241-267.
    [5]王国周,钢结构原理与设计[M],北京:清华大学出版社,1993.
    [6]向黎明,吕西林,高层钢管混凝土结构节点介绍[J],结构工程师,2000, (4):1~5.
    [7] Silva L.A.P. et al.Rotational stiffness of rectangular hollow section composite joints[J], Journal of structural engineering 2003, 129(4), 487~494.
    [8] Matsui, C.“Strength and Behavior of Frames with Concrete Filled Square Steel Tubular Columns Under Earthquake Loading,”The International Specialty Conference on Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Structure, Harbin, China, August, 1985
    [9]陈绍蕃.钢结构设计原理[M],北京:科学出版社,2003.6.
    [10]陈志华,姜忻良,陈敖宜等,方钢管混凝土节点连接承载力试验研究[R].天津:天津大学,2002.
    [11]苗纪奎,陈志华.方钢管混凝土柱-钢梁节点形式探讨[J].山东建筑工程学院学报,2005,20(3):64-68.
    [12]天津市工程建设标准,DB29-57-2003,天津市钢结构住宅设计规程[S].
    [13]中国工程建设标准化协会标准,CECS 159:2004,矩形钢管混凝土结构技术规程[S].
    [14]陈以一,李刚,庄磊. H形钢梁与钢管柱隔板贯通式连接节点抗震性能试验[J].建筑钢结构进展,2006,8(1):23-30.
    [15]庄磊.方钢柱-H型钢梁隔板贯通节点抗震性能研究[D].上海:同济大学硕士毕业论文,2005.
    [16]Kanatani, H., Tabuchi, M., Kamba, T., Hsiaolien, J., et al. A Study on Concrete Filled RHS Column to H-beam Connections Fabricated With HT Bolts in Rigid Frames[C]. Proceedings of the First Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete Conference, Engineering Foundation, Henniker, New Hampshire.1987,614-635。
    [17]Fujimoto et al.Behavior of beam-to-column connection of CFT column system under seismic force[C] Proceedings of 6th ASCCS international Conference on steel-concrete composite structure, los Angeles,2000.
    [18]Nishiyama I, Morino S, Sakino K,et al Summary of research on concrete-filled structural steel tube column system carried out under the US-Japan cooperative research program on composite and hybrid structures.BRI Research Paper No.147,Building Research Institute,Japan,2002.
    [19]] Nishiyama I., Fujimoto T., Fukumoto T., et al. Inelastic Force-Deformation Response of Joint Shear Panels in Beam-Column Moment Connections to Concrete-Filled Tubes[J].Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(2):244~252. (一次文献)
    [20]建筑抗震设计规范(GB50011-2001)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
    [21]余勇,吕西林,田中清等.方钢管混凝土柱与钢梁连接的拉伸试验研究[J].结构工程师1999,23~28.
    [22]吕西林,李学平,余勇.方钢管混凝土柱与钢梁连接的设计方法[J].同济大学学报,2002,30(1):1~5.
    [23]赵莉华,方钢管混凝土柱在钢结构住宅中的应用研究[D],天津:天津大学硕士毕业论文,2002.
    [24]陈志华,苗纪奎,赵莉华等.方钢管混凝土柱-H钢梁节点研究[J].建筑结构,2007,37(1):50-56.
    [25]陈志华,苗纪奎.方钢管混凝土柱-H型钢梁外肋环板节点研究[J].工业建筑,2005,35(10):61-63.
    [26]苗纪奎,方钢管混凝土柱与H钢梁的外肋环板节点研究[D],天津:天津大学硕士毕业论文,2005.
    [27]苗纪奎,陈志华.方钢管混凝土柱与钢梁的外肋环板节点抗震性能试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2007,27(2):85-90.
    [28]李黎明,方矩管混凝土柱计算理论分析及隔板贯通式节点研究[D],天津:天津大学硕士毕业论文,2005.
    [29]李黎明,陈志华,李宁.隔板贯通式梁柱节点抗震性能试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2007,27(1):46-53.
    [30]王来,王铁成,邓芄.方钢管混凝土框架内隔板节点抗震性能的试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动, 2005, 25(1): 76~80.
    [31]周天华.方钢管混凝土柱-钢梁框架节点的抗震性能及承载力研究[D],西安:西安建筑科技大学博士毕业论文,2004.
    [32]周天华,何保康,陈国津等.方钢管混凝土柱与钢梁框架节点的抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2004,25(1):9~16.
    [33]于旭.新型方钢管混凝土柱-钢粱节点的试验研究[D],南京:南京工业大学硕士毕业论文,2003.
    [34]周学军,曲慧.方钢管混凝土框架粱柱节点的抗震性能研究[J].钢结构,2005,20(1):26~28.
    [35]周学军,曲慧.方钢管混凝土框架梁柱节点在低周往复荷载作用下的抗震性能研究[J].土木工程学报,2006,39(1):38~42.
    [36]杜国锋,江楚雄.方钢管混凝土柱-钢梁框架节点优化设计[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版) ,2006, 28(6): 99~109.
    [37]肖万松,周湘,夏蕊芳等.矩形钢管混凝土节点域受剪承载力计算[J].华中科技大学学报,2007, 24(2): 56~59.
    [38]刘占科.钢结构侧板加强式刚性梁柱连接试验研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学硕士毕业论文,2006.
    [39]蔡益燕,张锡云,北岭地震和阪神地震后美日钢框架节点设计的改进[J],结构工程师,2000(增):200~210.
    [40]中华人民共和国行业标准,JGJ101-96,建筑抗震试验方法规程[S],北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
    [41]中国建筑科学研究院,GB/T50081-2002,普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准[S],北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
    [42]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,GB/T228-2002,金属材料室温拉伸试验方法[S],北京:中国标准出版社,2002.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700