化学催熟技术在油菜上的应用研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着农业产业结构的调整,油菜种植面积逐步扩大,同时油菜收获机械化探索也应运而生,但由于油菜固有的特性而使油菜机械收获作业效率较低。油菜为十字花科,芸苔属,总状无限花序,着生于主茎或分枝顶端。具有无限开花结角的习性,因此油菜主茎及各分枝的角果成熟时间相差较大。本试验是通过在油菜正常成熟前8~10d喷施化学催熟剂,促使油菜角果一致成熟,为油菜规模种植奠定较好的基础。本试验在催熟剂对油菜催熟效果、产量、品质及生理方面的影响进行了研究。
     本试验设置对照(CK:清水)及4个药剂处理(A1:0.5%CEPA+0.3%敌草快,A2:0.3%敌草快,A3:0.15%ABA+0.5%农达,A4:0.5%农达),与4月26日喷施,进行催熟研究,并得到了如下结果和初步结论:
     1化学催熟剂的选用及其催熟效果
     1.1 0.5%CEPA+0.3%敌草快:与对照相比,经0.5%CEPA+0.3%敌草快处理的油菜在千粒重上有所降低,差异达极显著水平;在含油量上有所降低,达极显著水平;产量有所降低,达显著水平,但此处理对抑制油菜光合作用、催枯脱水的效果较好,喷药后第2~3d植株即全部脱叶变黄。
     1.2 0.3%敌草快:此处理与对照相比,在千粒重上有所降低,差异达极显著水平;在含油量上有所降低,达极显著水平;产量有所降低,达极显著水平,但此处理对抑制油菜光合作用、催枯脱水的效果最好,喷药后第2d植株即全部变黄。
     1.3 0.15%ABA+0.5%农达:经0.15%ABA+0.5%农达处理的油菜千粒重上有所降低,但未达显著水平;在产量有所降低,达显著水平;但在含油量上有所增加,达显著水平;此处理催熟催枯效果较慢,喷药后6~7d植株变黄脱叶。但对油菜产量和品质等方面的影响较小。
     1.4 0.5%农达:此处理与对照相比,在千粒重上有所增加,未达显著水平;但在产量有所降低,达显著水平;在含油量上有所增加,达显著水平;油酸及亚油酸含量上都有所降低,但未达显著水平;在亚麻酸含量上有所增加,但未达显著水平,此处理对油菜产量和品质上的影响较小,催熟脱叶效果与含敌草快的两个处理相比较慢。
     1.5 0.5%CEPA+0.3%敌草快对油菜的催熟效果比单一的敌草快差,0.15%ABA+0.5%农达对油菜的催熟效果比单一的农达效果好。这说明催熟剂与植物生长调节剂之间具有协同和拮抗作用。
     1.6对油菜进行催熟处理后,其抗氧化酶的活性均比对照高。这说明可能是因为喷施的催熟剂对油菜有一定的逆境胁迫作用,破坏了油菜自身生物膜系统。油菜自身启动保护酶系统,提高抗氧化酶活性,表现出一定的抗逆性。
     2化学催熟剂使用时间的确定
     本研究是在油菜正常成熟前8-10d喷施药剂,敌草快催枯效果显著,但对油菜产量的影响较大,因此,建议在油菜正常成熟前5~6d使用。农达药效反应较慢,因此建议在油菜正常成熟前10d使用。
     3生产中建议使用的催熟剂
     在本试验中,含敌草快的2个处理,对油菜产量影响较大。含农达的2个处理对油菜产量和含油量影响较小。而且农达对环境安全,在土壤中无残效作用,不影响下茬作物生长。根据本试验结果可以得出,在生产上可采用0.5%农达+0.15%ABA处理,或者低浓度的敌草快+0.5%CEPA,在油菜成熟期进行喷施,实施机械化收获的效果较好。
With the adjustment of agricultural structure, the area of rape growing is gradually expanded, at the same time the mechanization harvest of rape emerged, but because of inherent properties of rape, the efficiency of mechanical harvesting of rape is lower. Rape is Cruciferae, Brassica, and inflorescence-like unlimited total, the flower born on top of the stem or branch. Unlimited flowering pod habit, so the maturing time of the pod on main stem and the branches was quite different. In this experiment, spray chemical ripening agents before 8~10d on rape of the normal maturation. To promote the same mature of rape. This experiment settles a good foundation for scale cultivation of rape. This experiment examined the effects of ripening agent on the rape, yield, quality and physiological implications.
     The test set up control (CK: clear water) and four pharmaceutical treatment (A1: 0.5% CEPA +0.3% Diquat, A2: 0.3% Diquat, A3: 0.15% ABA +0.5% Roundup, A4: 0.5 % Roundup), and spraying in the April 26, for ripening studies, and received the following findings and preliminary conclusions:
     1 Selection of Chemical Ripening Agent and Ripening effect
     1.1 0.5% CEPA +0.3% Diquat: Compared with the CK, the grain weight decreased by 0.5% CEPA +0.3% Diquat treatment of rape, the difference was extremely significant level; the oil content is somewhat lower, and reaches a extremely significant level; the yield decrease, and reaches significant level, but this treatment has a good effect on the inhibition of photosynthesis of rape, and urging dry dehydration, 2~3 days after spraying, all the plants that turn yellow and the leaf removal.
     1.2 0.3%Diquat: Compared with the CK, the grain weight decreased, the difference was extremely significant level; the oil content is somewhat lower, and reaches a extremely significant level; the yield decreased, and reached a significant level, 2 days after spraying all the plants that turn yellow, so this treatment has the best effect on the inhibition of photosynthesis of rape and reminder dry dehydration.
     1.3 0.15% ABA +0.5% Roundup: This deal compare with the CK, the grain weight somewhat increased , but not significantly; the yield decreased, and reached a significant level; oil content increased and reached a significant level; 5~6 days after spraying the plants turn yellow and the leaf removal, so the effect of this treatment is slow. But the influence of yield and quality is less.
     1.4 0.5% Roundup: Compared with the CK, the grain weight increased, but not reach significant level; but the yield decreased, reaching a significant level; the oil content increase, and reached significant level; oleic acid and linoleic acid content decreased, but not significantly; the content of linolenic acid increased, but not significant. The effect of this treatment is slower than treats A1 and A2. But this treatment has a smaller impact on yield and quality.
     1.5 0.5% CEPA +0.3% Diquat has a poorer ripening effect than a single Diquat on the rape, 0.15% ABA +0.5% Roundup has up a better ripening effect than a single Roundup on the rape. This shows that there are synergy and antagonism effects between the ripening agents and plant growth regulators.
     1.6 The activity of antioxidant enzymes was higher than CK after ripening treatments. This shows that the spraying may be due to the ripening agent on rape, which has some role in environmental stress, undermining the rape itself biofilm system. Rapes start their own protective enzyme system to enhance the activities of antioxidant enzymes, and it shows some resistance.
     2 The use of determine time on chemical ripening agents Spraying agent on rape 8~10 days before the normal mature, the effect of Diquat is significant on reminder withered, but impact on yield is greater, therefore, we recommended that use the chemical ripening agents 5~6 days before normal mature. Roundup efficacy slower response, it is suggested to use 10 days before the normal mature.
     3 Ripening agent of recommend on the production In this trial, the two treatments of Diquat that has a greater impact on the yield of rapeseed. Other two treatments of Roundup has a little affect on yield and oil content. And Roundup is safe to environmental, and has no residual effect in soil function, so it does not affect the next crop. According to the results of this study, it can be getting a conclusion. It can be used 0.5% Roundup+0.15% ABA in agricultural production, or a low concentration of Diquat +0.5% CEPA, the implementation of mechanized harvest is better when sprayed chemical ripening agents in mature of rape.
引文
[1]田晓莉,于运华,段留生,何钟佩,李丕明.作物化学控制技术的增产潜力[J].作物杂志,1997,(04):7-9.
    [2]郑之宽.发展优质油菜产业化的几个问题[J].安徽农学通报,1999,(02):1-4.
    [3]李建国.提高油菜生产机械化水平迫在眉睫[J].农机科技推广,2004,(01):27-28.
    [4]杨瑞新,陈淑敏,吴利影,等.化控技术在淮北地区小麦生产上应用前景[J].安徽农业技术师范学院学报,1995,9(4):65-69.
    [5]李建国.江苏油菜联合收获机的开发与运用[J].农机科技推广,2006,(7):29.
    [6]冯革良,倪旭照,朱晓康.油菜催枯剂应用与机械收获技术研究[J].江苏农机化,2002,(5):16.
    [7]顾万荣,葛自强,陈源,陈德华,吴云康.中国作物化控栽培工程技术研究进展及展望[J].中国农学通报,2005,(07):400-405.
    [8]王熹,陶龙兴.大田作物化控技术研究进展与应用前景[J].中国农业科技导报, 2000,(02):55-57.
    [9]梁长梅,姚满生,郭平毅.试论我国农作物化控技术的研究进展[J].山西农业科学, 2002,(01):84-88 .
    [10]王永山,王凤良,沈田辉,等.百草枯和乙烯利混配对棉花催熟效果好[J].农药,1996,第35卷(10):45-46.
    [11]闫向辉,刘向新.棉花化学脱叶催熟技术[J].新疆农机化,2004,(4):48.
    [12]上海植物生理研究所激素室乙烯组.乙烯利促进棉铃吐絮试验[J].植物学报,1977,19(1):20-24.
    [13]刘新林,孙柯,姜山,丁兆禄,郭景文.立收谷水稻试验效果[J].吉林农业, 2003,(04):12.
    [14]孙柯,刘新林,丁兆禄,姜山,李志强,陈荣发.水稻应用立收谷脱水效果试验[J].现代化农业,2003,(06):8-9.
    [15]施保国,邢华.直播稻穗期应用复方乙烯利催熟增产效应试验[J].现代农业科技, 2009,(01):186-190 .
    [16]赵玉庭,罗晞.小麦化控技术研究[J].耕作与栽培,1995,(06):27-29.
    [17]潘建春,袁志福,葛林.麦田应用百草枯催枯催熟技术[J].植保技术与推广, 2003,(02) :28-29.
    [18]刘京涛,刘炳强,吴振美,常慧红,巴秀成.立收谷水剂催熟对小麦机械收割效果的影响[J].作物杂志,2006,(03):53.
    [19]叶振帮,沈锦辉.化学药剂对甘蔗催熟效果的试验[J].广东农业科学,1985(6):23-24.
    [20]文颖.几种催熟剂对甘蔗生长和糖分积累的影响[J].四川甘蔗科技,1985(3):20-26.
    [21]吴三桂.几种甘蔗催熟剂试验初报[J].甘蔗糖业,1983(4):29-30.
    [22]卜云彤.香蕉催熟[J].农产品市场周刊,2007,(07):18 .
    [23]吴建辉,陈清香,任顺祥.40%乙烯利催熟香蕉的田间药效试验[J].广东农业科学,2008(08):56-57.
    [23] R.R.Kohli,叶能勋.用乙烯利催熟香蕉[J].世界热带农业信息, 1986,(05):49-50.
    [24]刘文燕,李振国,罗文华,金成忠.乙烯利对香蕉、柑桔、柿子果实的催熟作用[J].植物生理学通讯,1980,(04):38-42.
    [25]王桂盛,田中午,陈发,等.机采棉化学脱叶催熟技术的应用研究[J].中国棉花,1997,24(10):25-26.
    [26]金宗亭,赵永红,王惠滨,等.棉花催熟剂的使用技术[J].中国棉花,2006(2):28.
    [27]孔令杰.用乙烯利催熟棉花应注意的几个问题[J].农村百事通,2006(16):39-40.
    [28]张舒,许凌风,朱秋珍,何银香,陈其志. 40%乙烯利EC对棉花的催熟效应[J].湖北农业科学,2006,45(05):602-603.
    [29]袁秋梅,,何永香,张为民.飞机喷施哈威达棉花专用催熟脱叶剂的应用效果[J].农村科技,2007(10):27-28.
    [30]高善兵,王玉国.克无踪对棉花的催熟效果和应用技术[J].江西棉花,1999,21(05):22-23.
    [31]高艾兰,宋贤利. 50%噻苯隆可湿性粉剂对棉花脱叶及防止烂铃的药效试验[J].农药,2003,(01):53.
    [32]王永山,王风良,沈田辉,茅永琴.百草枯和乙烯利混配对棉花催熟效果好[J].农药, 1996,(10):45-46.
    [33]雷长春,姜国正,吴文俊,张文江.脱落宝加乙烯利低剂量棉花大面积脱叶催熟人工快采简介[J].新疆农垦科技,2004(05):9-10.
    [34]王熹.水稻的化学催熟[J].中国稻米,1995(3):36-37.
    [35]王熹,施一平.乙烯利对水稻的催熟效应[J].植物学报,1975,17(4):284-290.
    [36]吴小蓉,高安忠,贾庆利.20%敌草快在水稻上的催枯技术及试验效果初探[J].上海农业科技,2007(06):124.
    [37]刘京涛,刘俊展等.立收谷水剂对小麦催熟、脱水试验[J].植保技术与推广,2002,22(4):36-37.
    [38]黄义德,姚维传.作物栽培学[J].中国农业大学出版社,2001,188-192
    [39]刘翠红,展旭东,倪松尧,等.稻套油菜角果催熟试验研究[J].上海农业科技,2004,(6):56-57.
    [40]周可金,官春云,肖文娜,等.催熟剂对油菜角果光合特性、品质及产量的影响[J ].作物学报,2009,35(7):1-6.
    [41]田晓莉,李召虎,段留生,等.作物化学控制研究进展及前景[J].中国农业科技导报,2004,6(5):11-15.
    [42]刘生荣,刘党培.不同熟性棉花乙烯利催熟效应研究[J].耕作与栽培,2004(5):31
    [43]郝驼兰.乙烯利[J].山西农业科学,1980,(Z1):8.
    [44]许恩光.农达(草甘膦)使用技术简介[J].林业科技通讯,2000,(3):39-40.
    [45]苏少泉,耿贺利.百草枯特性与使用[J].农药,2008,47 (4):244-247.
    [46]张朝贤,钱益新,付仲文,等.百草枯生产工艺改进及其应用前景[J].植物保护,1999,(5):41-43.
    [47]陈江,沈德隆,章海燕.除草剂敌草快的合成[J].浙江化工,2004,(3):34-35.
    [48]彭娟莹,杨仁斌,郭正元.敌草快在甘蔗及土壤中的残留动态[J].生态与农村环境学报,2007,23(4):76-77,82.
    [49] Snipes CE,Cathey GW.Evaluation of defoliant mixtures in cotton.Field Crops Res[J],1992,28:327-334.
    [50] Logan J,Gwathmey CO.Effects of weather on cotton responses to Harvest-Aid chemicals[J].J Cotton Sci,2202,6:1-12.
    [51]徐新洲,聂新富,张学辉,等.北疆机采棉化学脱叶试验初探[J].新疆农机化,200l,(2):26-27.
    [52] Hake SJ,Hake KD,Kerby TA.Preharvest/harvest decisions.In:Hake SJ,Kerby TA,Hake KD(eds).Cotton production Manual.Publ 3352.Oakland:Univ of California Div of Agriculture Natural Resources,1996.73-81.
    [53]陈冠文,李新裕,王光强,等.南疆机采棉田化学脱叶技术试验[J].新疆农垦科技,2000(6):9-11.
    [54] Stewart AM,Edmisten KL,Wells R.Boll openers in cotton:effectiveness and environmental influences. Field Crops Res, 2000, 67:83-90.
    [55] Cathy GW.Physiology of defoliation in cotton production.In:Mauney JR ,StewartJM(eds).Cotton Physiology.Memphis,TN:The Cotton Foundation,1986.143-154.
    [56] Roberts BA,Curley RG,Kerby TA et al.Defoliation,harvest and ginning.IN:Hake SJ,Kerby TA.Hake KD(eds).Cotton Production Manual.Publ,3352.Oakland:Univ of California Div of Agriculture Natural Resources,1996:305-323.
    [57]李新裕,陈玉娟,闫志顺.棉花脱叶技术研究[J].中国棉花,2000,27(7):l4-16.
    [58] Brown LC,Hyer AH.A preliminary report on the influence varying periods of darkness on the defoliability of several varieties of cotton.In:Proceedings of the BeltwideCotton Defoliation Conference[R],USA,1954.44.
    [59]李新裕,陈玉娟,等.脱叶剂对棉花产量及纤维品质的影响[J].中国棉花,2001,28(2):11-13.
    [60]许建,丁志毅,等.棉花化学脱叶催熟效果及其对棉子质量影响初报[J].新疆农业科学,2003,40(2):116-118.
    [61]张智勇,茆敦俊,周嘉槐,温敬贤,郑相穆.乙烯利对两系杂交水稻催熟和谷粒充实的效应[J]安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1978-Z1-011 1978年Z1期:76-82.
    [62]王贵春,杨光圣.油菜高含油量育种研究进展[J].安徽农业科学, 2007年18期:2007,35(18):5373-5375.
    [63]张秀英,皇甫海燕,陈菁菁,等.高油酸油菜的研究进展及前景[J].作物研究,2007,21(5):654-658.
    [64]张振乾,肖钢,谈太龙,官春云.高油酸油菜研究进展及其前景展望[J].作物杂志,2009,(5):1-6.
    [65]官梅,李询.高油酸油菜品系农艺性状研究[J].中国油料作物学报,2008,30(1):25-28.
    [66]傅寿仲.油菜高亚油酸、低亚麻酸育种的进展[J].世界农业,1990,04(008):21-23.
    [67]李德谋,杨光伟,罗小英,加藤正弘,柿原文香.高亚油酸低亚麻酸甘蓝型油菜育种材料的选育(英文)[J].西南农业大学学报, 2001,(02):126-129.
    [68]李延莉,杨立勇,王伟荣等.甘蓝型双低油菜籽成熟过程中的品质变化分析[J].上海农业学报,2009,25(4):104-106.
    [69] Ohnnoto M, Uesugi R, Kakihara F.and Kato MVariation 0f fatty acid composition in amphidiploids strains preserved by self or sib-cross pollination form F, bybrids(AABC) between Brassica juncea (AABB) and Brassica napus L. (AACC) [J]. The 7th Int.Congress of SABRAO and Int. Symposiumm WSAA.1994:301-312.
    [70] Labana K.S, Banga S.S and Banga S.K.1993,monographe on Theoretical and Applied Genetics[J] 19:Breeding Oilseed Brassica.1993:76-93.
    [71]官春云,谭太龙,陈社员,等.油菜化学催熟研究初报[J].作物研究,2008,22(3):154-156.
    [72]张宏军,刘学,张佳,等.草胺膦的作用机理及其应用[J].农药科学与管理,2004,5(4):23-27.
    [73]叶贵标.除草剂作用机理分类法及其应用[J ].农药科学与管理,1999,20 (1) : 32- 35.
    [74]胡美君,王义芹,张亮.不同基因型小麦及其优选杂交后代的光合作用特性[J].作物学报,2007,33(11):1879-1883.
    [75]周可金,肖文娜,官春云.不同油菜品种角果光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数的差异[J].中国油料作物学报,2009,31(3):316-321.
    [76]隋娜,李萌,田纪春,等.超高产小麦品种(系)生育后期光和特性的研究[J].作物学报,2005,31(6):808-814.
    [77]刘后利.实用油菜栽培学[M].上海科学技术出版社,1987.268-288.
    [78]董树亭.高产冬小麦群体光合能力与产量关系的研究[J].作物学报,1991,17 (6): 461-468.
    [79] Isebrands JG, Ceulemans R, Wiard B. Genetic variation in photosynthetic traits among Populus clones in relation to yield [J]. Plant Physiol Bio-chem, 1998, 26: 427-437.
    [80] Zelitch I. The close relationship between net photosynthesis and crop yield[J]. Bioscience, 1982,32: 796-802.
    [81]冯佰利,赵琳,高小丽,等.干旱条件下冷型小麦的生理特性分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 33(3):38-42.
    [82]胡立勇,单文燕,王维金.油菜结实特性与源库关系的研究.中国油料作物学报, 2002, 24 (2) : 37-42.
    [83]刘可慧,于方明,李明顺,周振明,谌斌,蓝殿,孙双玉.镉胁迫对小白菜(Brassica campestris L.)抗氧化机理的影响[J].生态环境, 2008,17(04): 1466-1470
    [84]王兴明,涂俊芳,李晶,王立龙,刘登义.镉处理对油菜生长和抗氧化酶系统的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2006,17(01):102~106
    [85]李妍.铅镉胁迫对小麦幼苗抗氧化酶活性及丙二醛含量的影响[J].麦类作物学报, 2009,29(03):514-517.
    [86]金美芳,连阳梅,林炎鸿. NaCl胁迫对油菜幼苗膜脂过氧化和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].福建师大福清分校学报, 2009(02):16-20
    [87]张永志,赵首萍,徐明飞,王岗军,郑纪慈. Pb胁迫对番茄幼苗抗氧化酶系统的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2009(03):452-456
    [88]蔡顺香.芘胁迫对菠菜生长、叶片叶绿素和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].湖北农业学报,2009,24(2):157-161
    [89]白海波,毛桂莲,李晓慧,郑国琦,等.脱硫废弃物对盐碱地水稻幼苗抗氧化酶活性和膜脂过氧化作用的影响[J].西北农业学报,2009,18(3):122-126
    [90]王伟英,林江波,邹辉,吴良茄,等.水杨酸处理对水仙株型及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(4):157-160.
    [91]周可金,官春云,肖文娜.化学催熟剂对油菜角果叶绿素含量及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(12):3015-3019.
    [92]王聪,朱月林,杨立飞,刘正鲁,等. NaCl胁迫对菜用大豆种子膨大_抗氧化酶活性和活性氧代谢的影响[J].西南农业学报,2009,22(2):295-299.
    [93]萧浪涛,王三根.植物生理学实验技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2005:110-114.
    [94]冷锁虎,唐瑶,李秋兰,等.油菜的源库关系研究Ⅰ.角果大小对油菜后期源库的调节[J].中国油料作物学报,2005, 27(3) : 37-40.
    [95]官春云.油菜品质改良及分析方法[M]. 1985,湖南科技出版社.
    [96]杨文钰,屠乃美.作物栽培学各论[M].2003,中国农业出版社.
    [97]胡会庆,刘安国,王维金.油菜光合速率日变化的初步研究.华中农业大学学报, 1998,17 (5) : 430– 434.
    [98] Major D J, Bole J B, Charnetski W A. Distribution of photosynthate after 14CO2 assimilation by stems, leaves, and pods of rape plants. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1978, 58: 783– 787.
    [99]彭娟莹,杨仁斌.联吡啶类除草剂的作用机制及环境行为[J].农业环境科学学报, 2006, (S1): 435- 437.
    [100]王宏伟,梁业红,史振声,等.作物抗草甘膦转基因研究概况[J].作物杂志, 2007,(4):9-12.
    [101]陈虎保,苗以农.草甘膦的作用机理及部位[J].林业科技通讯,1997(1) :23-25.
    [102]崔莹.农达(草甘膦)使用技术简析[J].林业勘查设计,2007,(2):39-40.
    [103] Daives WJ, Sall Y Wikinson,Brianr Loveys. Stomatal control by chemical signaling and the exploitation of this mechanism to increase water use efficiecy in agriculture [J]. New Phytologist, 2002, 153:449-460.
    [104]魏安智,杨途熙,张睿,等. ABA对仁用杏花期抗寒力及相关生理指标的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2008,36(4):79-84.
    [105]董明辉,刘晓斌,陆春泉,等.外源ABA和GA对水稻不同粒位主要米质性状的影响[J].作物学报,2009,35(35):899-906.
    [106]刘登义,王友保,张徐祥,司琴.污灌对小麦幼苗生长及活性氧代谢的影响[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(10)1319-1322.
    [107]杨剑平,潘金豹,王文平,范洪琳等.水杨酸对水分胁迫下玉米根系膜脂过氧化的影响[J].北京农学院学报,2002,17(1):8-12.
    [108]朱云集,王晨阳,马元喜,夏国军,等.砷胁迫对小麦根系生长及活性氧代谢的影响[J].生态学报,2000,20(4):707-710.
    [1]肖文娜,周可金.不同化学催熟剂对油菜光合生理及产量与品质的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(03):107-112.
    [2]周可金,官春云,肖文娜,谭太龙.催熟剂对油菜角果光合特性、品质及产量的影响[J].作物学报,2009,35(07):1369-1373.
    [3]周可金,肖文娜,官春云.不同油菜品种角果光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数的差异[J].中国油料作物学报,2009,31(03):316-321.
    [4]周可金,官春云,肖文娜.化学催熟剂对油菜角果叶绿素含量及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(12):3015-3019.
    [5]周可金,许承保,肖文娜,王儒敬.优质油菜栽培与养分管理智能决策系统的设计与实现[J].湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版),2008,26(04):426-430.
    [6]周可金,雷红灵,肖文娜,章力干.供硫水平对花生叶片硫素含量与形态的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,14(06):1154-1159.《作物化学催熟技术的研究与应用进展》《湖北农业科学》录用待刊第一作者

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700