权力·死亡·荒诞
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
根据黑色幽默小说评论家马科斯·舒尔茨的论断,黑色幽默小说发端并发展于二十世纪六十年代的美国。这一论断强调了黑色幽默小说产生所植根的独特社会背景,从而使它超越了普通幽默的范畴。作为黑色幽默小说的代表作家,约瑟夫·海勒当之无愧为杰出的幽默大师之一。正如舒尔茨所断言,海勒幽默的独特性也在于其特殊的黑色内涵,本论文即着眼于阐释海勒小说的黑色内涵以及它的幽默媒介。
     海勒小说的黑色内涵极其丰富,它不仅呈现了文学创作从现代主义到后现代主义过渡时期所独有的特色,彰显了当世流行的存在主义思潮的影响,同时也反映了作者所处时代特殊的社会背景和他与众不同的生活经历。从本质上讲,它是在存在主义思潮和荒诞背景下现代人的一种生存逻辑。在这个内涵丰富的黑色网络中,起枢纽作用的分别是“权力等级”、“死亡”和“荒诞”。本论文使用跨学科研究方法,借助于米歇尔·福柯的“权力理论”,厄内斯特·贝克尔有关肉体死亡和精神永生关系的精彩论断,以及“存在”和“本质”分离的形而上关系,从社会学、心理学以及哲学三个视角,对海勒小说黑色内涵展开论述。
     在对海勒小说中的黑色内涵进行论述的同时,本论文有两个关注点。其一,本论文关注的是如何阐释海勒小说中黑色内涵的三方面内容以及这些内涵之间的相互关系。尽管先前已有诸多针对海勒作品“黑色本质”的研究,但它们均没有勾勒出这个黑色网络的整体框架。实际上,三个内涵是由表及里、逐步深入的:“权力”论题是开启海勒小说世界大门的钥匙,解读“死亡”是跨越小说世界门槛的关键,而开门后扑面而来、弥漫四周的则是在小说世界里起着根基作用、同时也是理解其黑色内涵关键所在的“荒诞”。其二,本论文的另一个关注点是“黑色”得以表达的媒介。随着对黑色幽默小说研究的逐步深入,一个现象逐渐突显,即“幽默”只是其表达的媒介体,而“黑色”才是“黑色幽默”的词核。这也解释了海勒为什么一再声明他不会采用任何没有黑色内涵的幽默。对海勒来说,幽默仅仅是一种能够而且应该将“黑色”的理念传达给读者的媒介而已。但与此同时,幽默在海勒的黑色幽默小说中的作用也是不可轻视的。一方面,由于幽默产生的重要前提是“制造惊喜”,而这个前提预设了黑色幽默的内核即荒诞的存在,因此“黑色”和“幽默”之间有互为铺垫、相辅相成的关系。另一方面,由于这种“制造惊喜”的前提与当时社会历史条件的限制之间存在矛盾,从而使得“黑色”和“幽默”之间存在着一种危险的张力,当这种张力达到一定界限时,黑色幽默的矛盾就会暴露出来。这正解释了为什么海勒后期的作品不能在艺术成就上超越他的第一部小说《第二十二条军规》,同时也自黑色幽默小说诞生之日起就预示了它的最终落幕。
     除了序言和结论,论文主体共由四章构成。序言部分,对国内外的海勒研究进行了文献综述,并结合影响海勒艺术特色的同时代社会、文学背景及其生活经历,总结出了海勒黑色幽默小说中“黑色”主要的三层内涵:等级权力、死亡和荒诞,这也是论文前三章要分别探讨的主题。第一章集中阐释“权力”主题,第二章讨论的是死亡带给海勒小说世界的影响,第三章着力探讨的是“存在”和“本质”的分离,即荒诞,而最后一章则聚焦于黑色得以表达的媒介一幽默。
     第一章结合福柯的“权力理论”对海勒小说中的权力体系从四个角度进行解读,即“圆形监狱”和“第二十二条军规”的相似性,性,权力话语和父子关系。海勒小说中的权力体系结构复杂,在像“圆形监狱”一样运作的“第二十二条军规”的统摄下,小说中的人物通过各种手段寻求着自我身份的认证。福柯认为,“圆形监狱”正因其特殊的结构布局,其才被认为是最强有力的现代化监狱。在“圆形监狱”里,囚禁犯人的监狱单面分布于一个圆形的建筑物内侧,圆形建筑物中央,矗立着监视塔。这样的建筑结构,既极大地降低了人力和物力的投入,又充分发挥了其监控犯人的功能。“第二十二条军规”的运作方式正与之相同,虽然它是无形的,却可以极其有效地用荒诞世界的逻辑操控士兵。在这些士兵中,唯一个无视军规、蔑视荒诞的正是故事的主角尤索林。
     无处不在的荒诞强烈冲击着海勒小说人物的自我意识,因此他们尽其所能地寻求一种生存的安全感,而缺失了情感的性、对权力话语的追寻以及父亲杀死儿子的倾向都是他们这种努力的集中表现。其一,性是新生命产生的前提和生命延续的象征,这也是海勒的小说人物都不同程度地沉溺于性爱之中的原因。而对于像《出事了》中的斯洛克姆以及《上帝知道》里的大卫王一样的人物角色,坦白自己的性动机和性行为,则是他们重新确立自我身份的重要途径之一。其二,对话语权的掌控也是小说人物获取生存优越感的重要途径之一。脱离了“本质”束缚而放纵的语言增加了小说的荒诞感,而对话语权的掌控也增强了小说人物对自我身份进行确立的信心。因此,尤索林才会在审查士官的信件时兴致盎然地发动了一场针对单词的大规模战争;而斯洛克姆则抓住每一个机会用言语战胜别人,并可以仅仅通过语言时态的转变而使自己轻而易举地摆脱生活中的困境。最后,折磨甚至杀死自己的儿子,则成为海勒小说人物获得生存安全感的另一种残忍手段。当俄狄浦斯长大之后,他将会篡夺王位并杀死拉伊俄斯。既然“俄狄浦斯情结”预设了存在于儿子身上的潜在威胁,拉伊俄斯想要先行杀死自己的儿子也是意料之中的事情。因此,当斯洛克姆亲手杀死自己最爱的儿子时,实际上他是在为未来的生活铲除潜在的威胁。
     第二章关注的是海勒小说中的死亡主题。权力的获得有助于海勒小说人物确立自我身份,而让他们最为恐惧的则是死亡。厄内斯特.贝克尔在《反抗死亡》一书中提到,“移情”是消减死亡恐惧的重要途径之一,而“移情”的对象越是抽象,这种消减作用则会更加明显。因此,透过小说主人公们对死亡怀有极大恐惧的表象,海勒真正想要呈献给读者的,其实是通过生理的消亡而达到精神上的永生。尽管《第二十二条军规》中的尤索林坚守着自己的生存哲学,从来不放过任何无须执行飞行任务的机会,而《画画这个》里的苏格拉底蔑视各种形式的生存哲学,并为自己的肉体消亡做好了一切准备,虽然二者的表现形式截然不同,但实际上,他们拥有一个共同信念,即他们即将得到精神上的永生。剖析这种理想主义的永生,其主要产生了以下两个方面的重要影响。
     一方面,由于对死亡的极其恐惧,海勒的小说人物在时间的“嘀嗒”声中产生了时空的错位感。既然“嘀”意味着开始而“嗒”意味着结束,所以后者的到来总会引起他们的巨大恐慌。因此,像邓巴一样的人物会运用各种荒诞的手段去延长“嘀”的进行而推迟“嗒”的到来。这也解释了《第二十二条军规》看似破碎的小说结构以及《出事了》中斯洛克姆在时间上对“现在”和“过去”困惑的原因。另一方面,由于死神桑纳托斯总是与爱神厄洛斯形影不离,想要逃避死亡就得远离爱情。这正是海勒小说的主人公逃避爱情的原因。例如,在《第二十二条军规》中勇于投身爱情的纳特利就成为了最先死去的士兵之一,主人公尤索林成功地明哲保身的原因也在于他沉溺于性爱而远离爱情,这也是理解《出事了》中的主人公斯洛克姆心里最阴暗处残忍地期盼自己所爱的女人一个个死去的关键因素。与此同时,因为同性恋意味着对弱势群体的归属,海勒的小说人物们都像《第二十二条军规》中的梅杰少校和《上帝知道》里的大卫王一样,不遗余力地撇清自己和这一弱势的他者群体的任何联系。由于情感的缺失,海勒的小说世界实际上是一片爱的荒原。海勒的小说世界里到处都弥漫着死亡的气息,但由于其在故事背景里安排了许多若隐若现的“嘀”声,因此读者仍然可以通过它们而感受到精神永生主题的存在。例如,海勒在《第二十二条军规》里设计了许多象征“再生”的人物形象,如代表着埃及再生女神的“白色士兵”和象征着玛雅文化中谷神的一级准尉哈尔福特等。另外,死亡也会带来小说主人公象征性的再生。例如,《像戈尔德一样好》中西德的死亡促进了小说主人公戈尔德犹太意识的复苏,而《出事了》中儿子的死亡使精神世界即将崩溃的斯洛克姆最终回归到正常的生活轨道。
     第三章阐释的是“黑色”的第三层含义——荒诞。在海勒的小说世界里,无论是等级权力体系还是令人窒息的死亡阴影,它们都有一个共同的本质,即“存在”和“本质”的分离。简.布洛克在《有关荒诞的形而上》一书中指出,荒诞存在的根源正是在于“存在”和“本质”的分离。这种“存在”和“本质”的分离深深植根于海勒的荒诞小说世界中,并引发了小说人物以及读者对于其“所指”和“能指”内涵的困惑。海勒主要运用了两种方式以更好地阐释“存在”从所谓的“本质”之中的脱离,即挑战权威和戏弄“能指”。首先,海勒明确了其对所谓的“权威”和“传统”的否定态度,正因如此,连西方文化里的终极权威——上帝,在其作品《上帝知道》中也变成了一个插科打诨的小丑。其次,海勒运用了悖论、幻觉记忆和非常规的否定等特殊的写作技巧,从而更好地突显了“能指”和“所指”之间的错位。
     在这个荒诞的世界里,只有那些能够操纵脱离了存在的“本质”和没有本质的“存在”的人物才能成为当权者,而大多数人则只能悲剧性地沦为荒诞的牺牲品。在这两类人中间,还夹杂着另一不同群体,他们神似克尔凯郭尔所描述的荒诞骑士。克尔凯郭尔的荒诞骑士又有“无限隐忍骑士”和“信仰骑士”之分。虽然有些人物意识到了世界的荒诞性,如《第二十二条军规》中的邓巴,由于他们没有像尤索林一样通过信仰超越荒诞而成为“信仰骑士”,因此只能被称为“无限隐忍骑士”。而是否以及如何成为“信仰骑士”,就成为海勒小说主人公们最主要的担忧和最痛苦的磨炼。作为海勒第一部小说的主人公,尤索林在某种意义上是幸运的,因为在小说结尾处海勒轻易地的安排了尤索林的“一跃”,正是这“一跃”使尤索林顺利地蜕变为一位“信仰骑士”。但是,海勒其他的主人公则注定在信仰与否的边缘做着惨烈的挣扎。因此,海勒笔下的主人公们都感受到了来自信仰的孤独感以及由于“存在”和“本质”脱离、不道德被赋予道德内涵而产生的“道德错乱”
     最后一章关注的是黑色内涵得以表达的媒介一幽默。在海勒的作品中,幽默存在的意义不仅在于产生即时的令人忍俊不禁的效果,其更重要的意义在于之后所引发的读者对幽默表象下所要传达的黑色内涵的反思。正是由于黑色内涵的存在,海勒式的幽默超越了普通幽默在一个社会里的矫正功能而具有了更深层次的作用。一方面,幽默可以帮助小说人物及读者克服由“黑色”带来的恐惧,促进小说情节以及读者阅读的逐步深入。另一方面,幽默使读者在阅读过程中产生一种阅读期盼,即通过幽默宣泄“黑色”所带来的压力,从而巧妙地使“黑色”主题得以加深。海勒的幽默机制主要包含了四个部分,即对读者情感的操控、使小说基调在精神层面和物质层面之间的突然转换、使幽默从智力层突进到情感层,以及频繁使用具有反讽效果的引经据典。由于海勒的小说人物对理想的道德传统表现出一种“怀乡情感”,因此海勒式幽默作品作为一种讽刺文学,更多地体现出了“建构”而非“解构”的理念。由于时代发展不断赋予文学作品以新的主题,所以这种“建构”理念预示着作品有可能会陷入因循守旧、甚至陈词滥调的怪圈。此外,由于幽默存在的一个重要前提是“制造惊喜”,所以海勒小说中“黑色”和“幽默”之间就存在着一种危险的张力。随着反讽意味的减弱,幽默的效果和荒诞的氛围也会消减直至消失。因此,“黑色”和“幽默”两者难免会最终会彼此抵消。
     本论文的结论主要归结为两点。其一,从本质上讲,海勒黑色幽默小说中的“黑色”彰显的是以存在主义思潮和荒诞为背景的现代人的一种生存逻辑。“黑色”的内涵主要包含等级权力、死亡及荒诞三个方面的内容。其中,“荒诞”处于核心位置,因为它预置了“存在”和“本质”的分离,并且使三层内涵有序地统一起来。通过对“所指”和“能指”的恣意操纵,所谓的权威阶层才能实现自己的独裁统治。而由于死亡意义的缺失,海勒的主人公才会对其产生极度的畏惧心理。所以,作为海勒小说世界的内核部分,荒诞毋庸置疑地成为了黑色内涵产生和存在的决定因素。其次,黑色内涵和幽默媒介之间的潜在张力,预示着发端并发展于上个世纪六十年代美国的黑色幽默小说帷幕将会最终落下。幽默效果的产生总有一个前提,即这种幽默可以制造惊喜。而正因为海勒的黑色幽默小说表现出“建构”式反讽的特质,它的黑色内涵也就注定会难以一直满足读者的阅读期待。当海勒的读者已经熟识甚至厌倦了小说的黑色内涵后,幽默便因丧失了制造惊喜的能力变得枯燥无味,从而无法继续吸引读者的注意力。与此同时,它也不再能够激发读者对黑色内涵的深刻反思。这不仅是海勒小说创作的困境,也是其他黑色幽默小说家无法摆脱的创作困境。然而,在将“黑色”和“幽默”结合的过程中,海勒创造了一套独特的文学思维方式和写作技巧,而这些是不会因为黑色幽默小说的落幕而退出文学历史舞台的。正因如此,我们才可以看到海勒的影子仍然不时地闪现在许多当代作家、尤其是当代黑色幽默作家的作品中。
When Max. F. Schultz, a renowned Black Humor fiction critic, claims that Black Humor fiction is specific to the 1960s in America, he is actually stressing that the significance of Black Humor fiction lies in its idiosyncratic social backgrounds, and consequently, Black Humor fiction goes beyond, or even above, the mere domain of humor. As a representative of Black Humor fiction authors, Joseph Heller is heralded as one of the most remarkable masters of humor. Just as Schultz claims, the idiosyncrasy of Joseph Heller's humor also lies in the blackness in his fiction. The current dissertation focuses on this blackness and its medium—humor.
     Positioning itself in the literary transitional period from modernism to post-modernism, Heller's fiction conveys a rather complex set of black implications, which not only includes influences from the existentialism prevailing in his age, but also reflects the particular social backgrounds as well as his personal experiences. The black implications essentially concern the survival logic of modern people against an existential and absurd living background. The dissertation argues that hierarchy, mortality and absurdity are the key issues in the black implications in Heller's Black Humor fiction and attempts to present a well-illustrated network of the blackness through explicating the three key issues from perspectives of sociology, psychology and philosophy. The interdisciplinary framework combines the power theories of Michel Foucault, the argument of Ernest Becker on the struggles between physical mortality and spiritual immortality, and the metaphysics on the separation between existence and essence.
     The dissertation highlights two concerns in illustrating the blackness in Joseph Heller's fiction. Firstly, it makes a point of interpreting the three black implications and their interrelationship. Although there are not a few essays focusing their attentions on the black nature of Heller's fiction, few of them have tried to illustrate the general network of these implications. Actually, the three implications are upgraded one after another:power is the key to open the door to Heller's fictional world, death serves as the threshold to it, and absurdity, the essential issue to understand the blackness, creates the pervasive and fundamental atmosphere inside Heller's fictional world. Secondly, it focuses on the medium through which the blackness gets to be interpreted. With critics'deeper inquiry into Black Humor fiction, it has become clear that "humor" just functions as the medium while "black" is the nuclear in the term "Black Humor". And this is the reason why Heller claims that he does not employ humor without a black implication in his novels. To Heller, humor is only a medium that could and should convey the blackness to the readers. However, humor also plays an indispensible role in Heller's Black Humor fiction. On the one hand, humor and blackness are complementary to each other, because the prerequisite of humor, to "make surprise", presupposes the existence of absurdity, which is the essential component in Black Humor. On the other hand, there is always a tension between blackness and humor caused by the contradiction between this prerequisite and the restrictions of social reality, which would eventually lead to the dilemma of Black Humor fiction. This accounts for why Heller's first novel Catch-22 could never be artistically surmounted by his later works, and predicts the end of Black Humor fiction ever since the very day it came into being.
     This dissertation is organized into four chapters besides the Introduction and the Conclusion. In the Introduction, it reviews the existing study on Heller's fiction both abroad and at home, introduces the social, literary and personal influences contributing to Heller's artistic features, and then generalizes the three main black implications in his fiction:hierarchical power, mortality and absurdity. The following three chapters discuss the three black implications respectively. Chapter One focuses on the implication of power, Chapter Two analyzes the impact of mortality on Heller's fictional world, and Chapter Three concerns the separation between existence and essence, namely, absurdity. The last chapter examines the medium humor, through which the blackness is interpreted.
     Chapter One explores the power implication with Foucault's power theories in four perspectives, that is, the similarity between Panopticon and "Catch-22", sexuality, power discourse and the father-son relationship. The hierarchical system in Heller's fictional world is rather complicated—With the Panopticon-like "Catch-22" overseeing on top, Heller's characters are engrossed in their struggles for self-identities. According to Foucault, it is due to the unique layout that Panopticon is considered to be an extremely powerful modern prison—a tower stands in the center circled by a ring-shaped building with all the cells facing the tower. The layout makes sure that the prisoners are under best control with the least investment. And this is exactly the way that "Catch-22" functions. Even though it is intangible, the military rule can manipulate soldiers to behave according to the logic of an absurd world. The only soldier who scorns the existence of the Panopticon-like "Catch-22" and its concomitant absurdity is Yossarian, the protagonist in Catch-22.
     Heller's characters are lost in their self-identities under the pressure of the omnipresent absurdity, so they make every effort to obtain a sense of safety. Sexuality without love, the pursuit of discourse power and the tendency of a father to kill his own son are all manifested in their efforts to obtain the sense of safety. First of all, sexuality is a way of reproduction and a symbol for the continuity of life, and that is why all Heller's protagonists are indulged in sexual activities. What's more, to confess their sexual motivations and behaviors is a way to reestablish their self-identities for such Heller heroes as Slocum in Something Happened and King David in God Knows. Secondly, the manipulation of discourse power also contributes to the characters'sense of superiority. While language at large adds to the sense of absurdity, discourse power sets up the characters'confidence in the establishment of their self-identities. Therefore, Yossarian is more than happy with the word play when censoring the officials'letters, while Slocum jumps at any chance to outspeak others and manages to resolve life dilemmas just by shifting tenses in discourse. Thirdly, torturing or even murdering their own son is another cruel way of Heller's characters to obtain their sense of safety. Now that the Oedipus Complex presupposes the potential threat of the son—after he grows up, Oedipus will usurp the throne and kill the father Laius, so it is comprehensible that Laius kills the son first. Henceforth, when Slocum murders his beloved son, he actually eliminates the potential threat for his future life.
     Chapter Two focuses on the theme of mortality in Heller's fiction. Actually, while power is essential to establish their identities, death is what Heller's characters are most afraid of. In The Denial of Death, Ernest Becker argues that "transference" is one of the crucial processes to eliminate the fear of death, and the more abstract a transference object tends to be, the less afraid a person is of his physical termination. Therefore, Heller's ultimate concern is the spiritual immortality instead of its physical counterpart, even though all Heller's protagonists are in dread of their physical termination. Even though Yossarian in Catch-22 believes in his survival philosophy and never gives up any chance to be grounded, while Socrates in Picture This scorns any survival philosophy and is always prepared for his physical execution, they essentially share the same belief to achieve the spiritual immortality. This idealistic immortality gives rise to two major consequences.
     For one consequence, the extreme fear of mortality brings about the characters' confusion about the time gap between the "tick" sound and the "tock" sound, or to put it simply, the constant time warps. Since "tick" means a beginning and "tock" brings about the ending, the "tock" sound naturally causes the characters'panic. Therefore, characters like Dunbar try every absurd method to prolong the starting "tick" sound and postpone the ending "tock" sound, which also sheds light on the seemingly fragmented structure of Catch-22 and the confusion of the past and the present of Slocum in Something Happened. For the other consequence, since the death god Thanatos never leaves the love god Eros alone, the only way to keep Thanatos away is to become immune to love. This is the reason why Heller's protagonists make every effort to stay away from love. For example, in Catch-22 Nately is courageous to love but he is also killed first, Yossarian indulges in sex but never falls in deep love, and Slocum in Something Happened secretly and cruelly embraces a death wish towards the women that he loves. Besides, since homosexuality means the belonging to a minority, characters like Major Major in Catch-22 and King David in God Knows spare no effort to exclude themselves from the powerless the-other group. Because the characters try not to show affection towards others, Heller's fictional world is practically a wasteland of love. Even though death is pervasive in the fictional world, Heller skillfully insinuates a rebirth theme as a "tick" sound to compensate for the motif of spiritual immortality. For example, there are a great many rebirth images in Catch-22, such as the soldier in white symbolizing an Egypt rebirth goddess and Chief White Halfoat symbolizing the Mayan corn god. Sometimes, a death gives rise to a symbolic rebirth of a protagonist. For example, in Good as Gold the death of Sid leads to the awakening of Gold's Jewish consciousness and in Something Happened the death of the son brings Slocum back to the normal life from the edge of spiritual collapse.
     Chapter Three explicates absurdity, the third black implication. In Heller's fictional world, the hierarchical system and the pressing mortality share the same essential meaning—the separation between existence and essence. In The Metaphysics of Absurdity, H. Gene Blocker argues that the origin of absurdity lies in the separation between existence and essence. This separation is imbedded in Heller's fictional world and confuses Heller's protagonists as well as his readers about the moon and the finger pointing towards the moon. Heller mainly employs two ways to illustrate this disruption of existence from its supposed essence, namely, to challenge the authority and to make fun of the signifiers. Accordingly, Heller shows such a negative attitude towards the so-called authority and tradition that even God, the extreme authority in Western culture, turns into a clown in God Knows. And Heller also resorts to unusual writing skills such as paradoxes, deja vu and unusual negation to stress the ambiguous relationship between the signifier and the signified.
     In the absurd world, only those who can manipulate the epistemological disruption could gain the upper hand, while most of those who cannot tragically fall victim to absurdity. Besides, there is also another group of Heller's characters who resemble Kierkegaard's absurd knights. Kierkegaard separates his knights into two kinds:the knights of faith and the knights of infinite resignation. While knights of infinite resignation like Dunbar in Catch-22 realize the absurdity of the world, they can never possibly "jump" above the absurdity as knights of faith like Yossarian could do. To become a knight of faith is the main concern and the most miserable torture for Heller's characters. In a sense, Yossarian as the Heller's first protagonist is lucky, because Heller easily arranges him to be a knight of faith who "jumps" at the end of the novel, while Heller's other protagonists are doomed to struggle tragically on the verge of being a knight of faith. No matter whether a knight of faith or a knight of resignation that Heller's protagonists prove to be, all of them are inevitably exposed to two consequences, loneliness and moral insanity. Loneliness is unavoidable on their way to be a knight of faith, and the disruption between existence and essence endows the immoral with moral implications, which causes the "moral insanity".
     The last chapter examines humor, the medium of blackness. Actually, the significance of humor lies in the retrospection that it causes rather than the humorous effect on the spot. Since the application of humor is to interpret the black implications, the humor in Heller's Black Humor fiction has more functions besides the usual social corrective function of the traditional humor. For one thing, it helps the characters and the readers get over the horror caused by the blackness. For another, Heller gets to intensify tactfully the blackness with the manipulation of the readers'expectation of the humor release from the pressure caused by the blackness. The mechanism of Heller's humor mainly contains four ingredients:the manipulation of the readers'emotions, the unexpected tonal shift between physical and spiritual, the capricious focus changing from the intellectual effect to the effective one and the constant ironic literary references. Because Heller's protagonists show their nostalgia towards an ideal Orthodox morality, the humor in Heller's fiction often appears with more generative rather than degenerative satirical edges. With the development of society and the corresponding refreshment of literary themes, to be generative predicts a work to be conservative and eventually fall into literary cliche. However, humor constantly demands a degenerative satire to "make surprise". Hence, there always lies a potential danger for the integration of blackness and humor in Heller's fiction. With the satirical strength being reduced, the humorous effect and the absurd aura could be diminished till they are totally eliminated. Therefore, blackness and humor will inevitably cancel each other out.
     The conclusion of the dissertation is condensed into two points. Firstly, Heller's blackness essentially concerns the modern people's survival logic against an existential and absurd background. Power, mortality and absurdity are the three key issues in the blackness, which are integrated by the metaphysical separation between existence and essence. It is the willful manipulation of the moon and the finger pointing towards it that the hierarchically dominating class always employs to realize their tyranny; and it is the lack of an essential meaning of mortality that the very mention of death could curdle the protagonists'blood. In this way, lying at the kernel of Heller's fictional world, absurdity virtually accounts for the occurrence and existence of the blackness. Secondly, the tension between blackness and humor practically predicts the dying away of Black Humor fiction in the 1960s in America. The primary condition for a humor to achieve its effect is to "make surprise". Since Heller's Black Humor fiction tends to be more generatively satirical, its black implications are doomed to wear the readers'expectations out. When the readers are used to or even tired of the black implications, humor will lose its surprising appeal and the blackness will cease to sustain the readers'attention. Consequently, the humor in Heller's Black Humor fiction will lose its humorous effect and cannot provoke the readers'retrospection. This is a creative dilemma not only for Joseph Heller but also for other Black Humor novelists. Nevertheless, it can never be denied that Heller's integration of blackness and humor as well as his original rhetorical devices to achieve this integration is still inspiring contemporary authors, especially those of black humor.
引文
1 For those different division methods, see Jan Solomon, "The Structure of Joseph Heller's Catch-22." A Catch-22 Casebook, eds. Frederick Kiley and Walter McDonald,122-31; Robert Merrill, Joseph Heller.33-49; Clinton S. Burhans Jr., "Spindrift and the Sea:Structural Patterns and Unifying Elements in Catch-22." Joseph Heller's Catch-22. ed. Harold
    Bloom,47-58 (also see James Nagel, ed. Critical Essays on Joseph Heller.40-50); Howard J. Stark, "The Anatomy of Catch-22'," A Catch-22 Casebook, eds. Frederick Kiley and Walter McDonald,145-158; Stephen W. Potts, Catch-22: Antiheroic Antinovel,30-32.
    2 See Judith Ruderman, Joseph Heller,30-48. and Gary W. Davis, "Catch-22, the Language of Discontinuity," Joseph Heller's Catch-22, ed. Harold Bloom,87-100, and Carol Pearson, "Catch-22 and the Debasement of Language," CEA Critic 1976:30-35.
    3 See Robert Merrill, Joseph Heller,39-49; Judith Ruderman, Joseph Heller,33-35; James L. McDonald, "1 See Evcrthing Twice! The Structure of Joseph Heller's Catch-22," A Catch-22 Casebook, eds. Frederick Kiley and Walter McDonald,102-08; James M. Mellard, "Catch-22:Deja vu and the Labyrinth of Memory," A Catch-22 Casebook, eds. Frederick Kiley and Walter McDonald,109-21.
    1 For Heller's "debt" towards Hemingway, also see James Nagel, "Two Brief Manuscript Sketches:Heller's Catch-22." Modem Fiction Studies.20 (1974):221-24.
    2 See Victor J. Milne, "Heller's Bologna:A Theological Perspective on Catch-22." Critique,12.2 (1970):50-69, and W. K. Thomas, "The Mythic Dimension of Catch-22." Texas Studies in Literature and Language.15 (1973):189-98.
    1 See Marcus K. Billson III, "The Un-Miderbinding of Yossarian:Genesis Inverted in Catch-22." Joseph Heller's Catch-22. ed. Harold Bloom,121-31. And David M. Craig, Tilting at Mortality:Narrative Strategies in Joseph Heller's Fiction, 50-60.
    2 Both James Nagel and Robert Merrill believe that Something Happened is experiencing a rising popularity. (James Nagel, Critical Essays on Joseph Heller,14, and Robert Merrill, Joseph Heller.73.)
    3 About Slocum's motivation to kill his son, see Susan Strehle, "Slocum's Parenthetical Tic:Style as Metaphor in Something Happened," Notes on Contemporary Literature,7(1977):9-10; George Sebouhian, "From Abraham and Isaac to Bob Slocum and My Boy:Why Fathers Kill Their Sons," Twentieth Century Literature,17 (1981):43-52; Richard Hauer Costa, "Notes from a Dark Heller:Bob Slocum and the Underground Man," Texas Studies in Literature and Language,23.2 (1981):159-82; and also Jan Delfattore, "The Dark Stranger in Heller's Something Happened." Critical Essays on Joseph Heller, ed. James Nagel,127-38.
    'Also see Lindsay Tucker, "Entropy and Information Theory in Heller's Something Happened." Contemporary Literature,25.3 (1984):323-40; Patricia Merivale, "'One Endless Round':Something Happened and the Purgatorial Novel," English Studies in Canada,6.4 (1985):438-49; and also James M. Mellard, "Something Happened:The Imaginary, the Symbolic, and the Discourse of the Family." Critical Essays on Joseph Heller, ed. James Nagel,138-55.
    See Robert Merrill. Joseph Heller,98-122; and Judith Ruderman, Joseph Heller,135-66.
    1 See Gene Lyons, "Contradictory Judaism," The Nation,228 (1979):727-28; Leon Wieseltier. "Shlock of Recognition," The New Republic.29 Oct.1984:31-33. and Sanford Pinsker, "How "Jewish" is Joseph Heller?" Jewish News,10 Sept 1998:50.
    2 See Walter Goodman. "Heller Contemplating Rembrandt," New York Times,1 Sept.1988:C23; and Robert Adams. "History Is a Bust." New York Times Book Review.11 Sept.,1988:9.
    3 See Laura Elena Savu. "This Book of Ours':The Crisis of Authorship and Joseph Heller's Portrait of an Artist, as an Old Man." Intertexts,7.1 (2003):71-90.
    1 Heller often claimed himself to be an apolitical person in interviews. For example, in the interview with Sam Merrill in 1975, he said that he had not voted for more than ten years except once and decided never to vote again.
    2 There was a notorious Hollywood blacklist, and the interrogations and hearings were conducted by Joseph McCarthy himself. "Hollywood Blacklist." Wikipedia,17 Oct,2010
    1 Litton and Olson argue that, "Death anxiety becomes overwhelming when one has to confront it in isolation. Societies and social institutions when people believe in them—are able to aid in mastering death anxiety by generating shared images of continuity beyond the life of each single person" (Litton and Olson,72).
    1 CA is an empirical approach to discourse analysis, with the representative of Harvey Sacks and the basis on the ethno-methodological approach to sociology of Harold Garfinkel.
    Catachresis, a special figurative language, refers to "the use of terms borrowed from another realm to name what has no literal language of its own" (Miller, The Ethics 73).
    1 The character of Ralph was based on Ron Ziegler, Nixon's Press Secretary, who had been put "on record primarily for his verbal agility" (Seed 144).
    1 Catch-22 was published in 1961, and Picture This came out in 1988. So there is a twenty-seven years' gap between the two novels.
    1 Actually, Dunbar was such an important character that Heller at one time conceived a novel with Dunbar being the protagonist, but this plan was given up at last somehow. In an interview, Heller even suggested that he could have started the novel with Dunbar the protagonist with the sentence, "Dunbar woke up with his name on the door and a Bigelow on the floor and wondered how he had got there" (Whiteman Prenshaw 162).
    2 Kermode's argument is that the modern fiction has already transferred its attention to and focused its attention on the tick-tock interval. (Kermode 55)
    1 David M. Craig has an excellent argument about Gold's loss of the past, "His mother was a part of a Jewish and American past which he no longer shares and which even returning to the grave he cannot recover. The distances widen between life and death, mother and son, Jewish and Jewish present. The unread Hebrew symbolizes a communal heritage and family connections that are no longer shared" (Tilting at mortality 132).
    1 In 2009, the author visited Brandeis University in Massachusetts, where Heller donated all of his scripts of Catch-22 as well as other important materials, and got to read many first-hand resources, among which was a script about the details and significances of the three missions. See Appendixl.
    See more details about the division on page 49 in Robert Merrill's Joseph Heller.
    1 Kermode expounds the Principle of Complementarity in The Sense of Ending and endows its conception with more connotative meanings. According to his point of view, the process of Complementarity is a fiction, "which not only uses the past as a special case but is designed to relate events that appear to be discrete and humanly inexplicable to an acceptable human pattern" (59).
    See Section Two in this chapter.
    1 See Section Two, this chapter, for the division of Catch-22 into three parts.
    2 See Woodson's A Study of Joseph Heller's "Catch-22". especially Chapter One, for a detailed analysis of Clevinger's image.
    3 There are several maize gods according to various mythologies, and the maize god in Maya culture is a representative one.
    1 See Page 155 in Herbert Fingarette's Death:Philosophical Soundings, where the author quotes and translates Freud's 1915 essay "The Transitory"
    2 Many critics criticize that Heller's fiction often ends too abruptly. For example, Vance Ramsey, in his well-known essay "From Here to Absurdity:Heller's Catch-22", contends that "the last part of the novel is unconvincing" (A Cateh-22 Casebook 18.234).
    1 Susan Braudy says in an article about Heller that, "from 1950 to 1952, he [Heller] taught English at Penn State and didn't like it" (Sorkin 38).
    1 In Catch-22:Antiheroic Antinovel, Stephen W. Potts defines "Kafkaesque" as a term "applied to any situation in which the individual is up against overwhelming complexities and absurdities, usually institutional/bureaucratic", and later he takes Clevinger in Catch-22 as one example of a victim of a "Katkaesque" institution (Potts 59,65).
    Heller makes his presence in GG more than once. For example. Heller once appears in the context in a different way, "I. C. M.'s clients include Barbra Streisand, Steve McQueen, Isaac Stern, Peter Benchley, Arthur Miller, Tennessee Williams, Harry Reasoner. Joseph Heller, and Sir Laurence Olivier" (360).
    1 Nick Perry claims, "In the analysis of Catch-22 which follows it is identified as a text in which the power of language is deployed against the language of power". (Nick Perry, "Catch, Class and Bureaucracy:The Meaning of Joseph Heller's Catch-22". Sociological Review.32 (1984):723.)
    2 About defamiliarization, Sartre has a similar argument, "to describe the object in terms other than its customary utilitarian, functional description....This device resembles poetic imagery in which we are invited to see familiar objects in unfamiliar ways. These alternative descriptions provide a sense of the object transcending its usual description, and thereby, an indirect sense of its existence transcending all description" (Block 76).
    3 In their essay "Joseph Heller and the'real'King David", John Friedman and Judith Ruderman believe that Rabbi Samuel has exonerated David of all his sins. According to Rabbi Samuel, there are three reasons why David's love affair is not sinful:first, according to the context of Holy Bible, the adultery could only possibly have happened in David's imagination; second, as a tradition, before departing for the war, Uriah must have left Bathsheba a divorce paper, in case of his death in the war, she could marry again; and then, since Uriah's retort to David's asking for him to go back home was rude, it was reasonable for David to send him to the front to be killed. (Judith Ruderman and John Friedman, "Joseph Heller and the'Real'King David," Judaism,36.1 (1987):291-301.)
    1 Blocker says that even Camus has realized that there are limitations to express absurd ideas in the traditional style, he still holds on to the traditional one. (Blocker 45)
    2 In "Shlock of Recognition", Leon Wieseltier examines the changes that have happened to Jewish Humor in America and gives a definition of "Shlock of Recognition", by which he means, "The Strange as the familiar, the extraordinary as the ordinary, the high as the low, the pure as the impure—it amounts to a genre, preposterously prominent in American-Jewish culture". And then he derogates GK as a typical "Shlock of Recognition". (Leon Wieseltire, "Shlock of Recognition," The New Republic. October 29, 1984:31-33.) up as a Jewish writer", and the Jewish elements in his novel are presented "[n]ot very, and certainly not importantly". Despite the arguments of such critics as Sanford Pinsker, it is still indubitable that Heller grows up in a Jewish community which guarantees his specific Jewish ways to view life paradoxically, Chet Flippo once appropriately describes Heller as a person "whose shyness is continually at odds with his fierce pride", and "a man of many principles, the first of which is flexibility" (Sorkin 224).
    See Section One in Chapter One for the detailed discussions about the paradoxical logics of "Cateh-22".
    The Playboy interview mentions that, "The book was called'Catch-18', a title that was later increased by four upon publication of Leon Uris' 'Mila 18—Heller's editors didn't think people would buy two novels with the same number" (Sorkin 144).
    To stress it is the information that is negated, Laura Hidalgo Downing proposes that the two terms, namely, the explicit denial and the implicit denial, should be replaced with "modification of information explicitly stated in the discourse" and "modification of intormation evoked or inferred from the discourse". (Laura Hidalgo Downing, "Negation as a Stylistic Feature in Joseph Heller's Catch-22:A Corpus Study", Style.37.3 (2003):13.)
    1 In the introduction to Critical Essays on Joseph Heller. James Nagel claims that "the reputation of the novel [SH] has gradually improved over the years" (Critical Essays on Joseph Heller 14). Another example is Robert Merrill's argument that "Since 1974…almost all critical studies of Something happened have been quite positive, even celebratory" (Joseph Heller 73).
    In "Seeing Heller's Yossarian as a Crypto—Jew:A Critic Considers the Place of Catch-22 in the Pantheon", Sanford Pinsker argues that the argument with God in Heller's fiction is only for a humorous effect, "Jewishness, seriously considered, is not part of the congenial turf of… Heller", while "[i]n the best of Yiddish humor, the quarrel is with God" (Forward, Dec.31,1999:13).
    1 Disgruntled with Heller's performance at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs in 1986, in the end of his essay "Looking Back at Catch-22", Norman Podhoretz claimed, "What 1 have come to question, however, is whether the literary achievement was worth the harm—the moral, spiritual, and intellectual harm—Catch-22 has also undoubtedly managed to do. and to the'consciousness'of, by now, more generations than one" (Platinum Periodicals,109.2:32-37).
    1 The readers could feel familiar when David with his army, in GK. fights for the Philistines against his own Jewish people—David is actually repeating what Milo has done in Catch-22.
    This is the reason why Heller believes that the crude and indifferent Milo in Mike Nichols's film version of Catch-22 is completely different from the original innocent fictional one. Heller says, "Milo Minderbinder portrayed in the movies was not at all similar, I feel, to the Milo Minderbinder portrayed in the novel....My Milo Minderbinder tended to be a very moral person, a very innocent person—innocent to the extent that he is either unaware or indifferent to the consequences of his activities" (Kathi A. Vosevich, "Conversations with Joseph Heller", WLA,11.2:96.).
    2 When discussing Aarfy's unusual behaviors, David H. Richter believes that Aarfy's odd behaviors lie in his "hilariously bourgeois attitudes toward sex" (Fable's End:Completeness and Closure in Rhetorical Fiction 145).
    3 For other examples, in a review on Catch-22, the novel is blasphemed to be "immoral in the way of so much contemporary fiction and drama in being inclusively, almost absent-mindedly, anti-institutional" (A Catch-22 Casebook 37). Also, Sanford Pinsker believes boredom in Catch-22 is a stronger enemy compared with the Nazis, so "social critics are not likely to agree either with Heller's assessment or with his moral judgment" (Joseph Heller's Catch-22144).
    1 Stephen L. Snidennan claims that Yossarian is actually the most culpable figure in Catch-22, who is, directly or indirectly, responsible for all the accidents. (Joseph Heller's Catch-22 39-46)
    2 For the medieval morality in Heller's Black Humor fiction, see Section Three in Chapter Four.
    3 In the interview with Kathi A. Vosevich, when defending Yossarian's morality, Heller says, "I would never think of him as amoral. It seems to me it would have been immoral to think any other way than they way he does then" ("Conversations with Joseph Heller," WLA, 11.2:95).
    1 In Anatomy of Criticism. Northrop Fryc explicitly points out the tragic implications in Dionysiac emotions and the comic characteristic in Apollonian illusion, "Tragic stories...may be called Dionysiac" and the "mythical comedy...is Apollonian" (Frye 35-36.43).
    (?)Wolfgan Bernard Fleischmann in Encyclopedia of World Literature in the 20th Century also seconds the opinion that Black Humor is an exclusive label to a group of American writers in the 1960s.
    1 In the interview with Elenore Lester in 1967, Heller requires, "[D]on't classify me as a writer of black comedy", and then two years later, when talking with Dale Gold, he confesses that, "1 don't like the term'black humor" (Sorkin 4tf, 56).
    2 Heller claims that, "I tried very hard in Catch-22 to take out anything that would only be of a humorous nature, that didn't contribute to the feeling of absurdity" (Sorkin 87). Heller even confesses that he does not realize that he has been writing humorously until "one day I heard this friend of mine in another room laughing out loud" (Sorkin 110).
    1 Frye argues that, "In fiction, we discovered two main tendencies, a'comic' tendency to integrate the hero with his society, and a'tragic'tendency to isolate him" (Anatomy of Criticism 54).
    2 In order to underline the importance of "tension" and "elasticity", Henri Bergson goes on to enumerate the symptoms of the deficiency, "If these two forces are lacking in the body to any considerable extent, we have sickness and infirmity and accidents of every kind. If they are lacking in the mind, we find every degree of mental deficiency, every variety of insanity. Finally, if they are lacking in the character, we have cases of the gravest inadaptability of social life, which are the sources of misery and at times the causes of crime" (Sypher 72).
    For the discussion about the realism in GG, see Section One, Chapter Three.
    The two elements, that is. Gold's rigidity and readers' indifference, accord to Bergson's two essential conditions for a comic situation, namely, "unsociability in the performer" and "insensibility in the spectator" (Sypher 154).
    In "Schlock of Recognition", Leon Wieseltier claims that Heller's humor, with the descending touch of the solemn Jewish tone, tends to stop just at the surface value (Leon Wieseltier, "Shlock of Recognition," The New Republic, October 29,1984:31-33.).
    1 While most critics of Black Humor fiction shun the topic of humor, those who do have dealt with the humor agree that humor is a tool to deal with horror. For example, Mathew Winston directly points out, "The comedy in black humor helps us overcome our fears" (Black Humor:Critical Essays 257); J. Jerme Zolten, in his essay "Joking in the Face of Tragedy" has a similar argument, "Laughing and crying are closely linked;'Laugh to keep from crying'" (Black Humor:Critical Essays 306); and Wylie Sypher believes, "To be able to laugh at evil and error means that we have surmounted them" (Comedy 246).
    1 For the death symbol of the soldier in white, see Section Four, Chapter Three.
    See Section Two "Absurdity and Meta-communication". in Chapter Three.
    1 Most critics believe that Black Humor fiction should end with a tragic scene, such as Max Schulz in Black Humor Fiction of the Sixties. Terry Heller also says that some Black Humorists like Lenny Bruce would tease the seriousness, but that kind of humor is more often than not "self-destructive" (Pratt 213).
    At the end of the essay, Terry goes further to clarify three ways that humor intensifies horror, namely, "the reversal from humor to horror", "the creation and violation of the expectation of humor", and "the creation of the desire for humorous release" (Pratt 212).
    1 Burhans believes that his division method is more reasonable, as the method can clarify all the necessary parts in a conventional novel in Cateh-22. "Within these general structural patterns of organization and tone. Catch-22's central conflict develops in a conventional plot and sub-plot structure. The resulting conflict develops in a generally classical pattern:exposition, initiation, complication, rising tension, crisis, and climax" (Bloom, Joseph Heller's Catch-22 51).
    2 Robert Merrill also divides the novel into three parts. For details, see Section Two, Chapter Two.
    1 In A Psychology of Humor. Norman Holland proposes a useful chart that explicitly puts forwards the stimulus, conditions, psychology, physiology and catharsis of a humor. In that table, Holland identifies the stimulus with incongruity. (Holland 108)
    2 Henri Bergson points out the two paradoxical conditions for laughter from the viewpoint of the readers'response. The first condition is that humor must be applied to the human world—"the comic does not exist outside the pale of what is strictly human", and the other is the absence of involvement of readers'emotions (Sypher,62-63) (sic).
    1 As to how to deflect life towards mechanical, Bergson says that to be comic a context must focus on gestures instead of actions, the latter being the former plus human emotions. As to the differences between gestures and actions, Henri Bergson says, "By gestures we here mean the attitudes, the movements and even the language by which a mental state expresses itself outwardly without any aim or profit, from no other cause than a kind of inner itching....Action is intential or, at any rate, conscious; gesture slips out unawares, it is automatic...action is exact proportion to the feeling that inspires it"(Sypher 153).
    2 See the first section in this chapter.
    1 For the discussion about the realism of Heller's fiction, see Section One, Chapter Three.
    2 In the Playboy interview. Heller is confronted with an embarrassing question, "Do you feel at all responsible for the guys in Vietnam—and apparently there were a lot of them—who went over the hill after reading Catch-22?" (Sorkin 152)
    For the morality issue of Yossarian, see Section Three in Chapter Three.
    2 In his first monograph on Joseph Heller's fiction and plays. Potts argues that Heller is essentially an ideal moralist and accordingly his protagonists are orthodox moralists at heart. (From Here to Absurdity. The Moral Battlefields of Joseph Heller 18.57,63)
    After knowing that Murray Kempton has referred to Catch-22 as an "orthodox book in terms of its morality". Heller confesses that Kempton is right. Actually, the medieval morality also runs through his other novels (Sorkin 6).
    1 Berys Gaut believes that the elarification of a target could intensify a humorous effect, because the readers could relish more in the humors that "hit their target precisely". Since morality presupposes the presence of an object to attack at, it could enhance the humor enormously (Berys Gaut, "Just Joking:The Ethics and Aesthetics of Humor," Philosophy and Literature.22.1:61.).
    Northrop Fryc believes that there are four explieit components to a romance:confliction, death, disappearance and the rebirth of the hero, which correspond to the four mythoi of comedy, romance, tragedy, and irony respectively. Therefore, it is possible for a romance to include the elements of the four mythoi. (Frye 192)
    For a detailed discussion of the dark stranger image in Slocum's dreams, see Joan DelFattore's essay "The Dark Stranger in Heller's Something Happened", where she argues that the dark stranger stands for such threats as the loss of his sexual strength and his power domination.
    Harold Bloom believes that Catch-22 is not a work for "all the time", but instead, it is "definitive of what is meant by a Period Piece" for the time from 1960s to 1970s (Bloom, Joseph Heller's Catch-221).
    1 In Contemporary American Novelists of the Absurd. Charles Harris contends that both the American Black Humor fiction and the French theatre of the absurd belong to the literature of absurdity. "An analogue to recent developments in the American novel may be found in the Theater of the Absurd in French...the absurdist novel of the sixties, like the French Theater of the Absurd, seeks new ways to integrate subject matter and form" (Harris 20).
    1 In her article "Jewish American Renaissance", Ruth R. Wisse has a detailed explanation of the "Jewish Renaissance"
    See the essay in John Barth's The Friday Book:Essavs and other Nonfiction.
    1 In another interview with Sam Merrill, Heller says, "1 deliberately seeded the book with anachronisms like loyalty oaths, helicopters, IBM machines and agricultural subsidies to create the feeling of American society from the McCarthy period on" (Sorkin 150).
    2 In the interview with George Mandel, Heller says that he has worked on Catch-22 for eight years, two of which is spent on laughing.
    1 New York Times Book Review hurt Joseph so much that even after thirty years Heller still remembered their denouncement that it "gasps for want of craft and sensibility" and "is repetitious and monotonous." What's worse, The New Yorker said Catch-22 "doesn't even seem to have been written; instead it gives the impression of having been shouted onto paper....Heller wallows in his own laughter and finally drowns in it" (qtd. in Heller, Now and Then 213). After knowing that Heller had taken out almost two hundreds words from the first draft and the title of every chapter was actually added afterwards, critics more easily tended to believe that there was no organized structure of Catch-22.
    2 See Appendix I.
    Adams, Robert. "History Is a Bust." New York Times Book Review.11 Sept.1988:9.
    Aldridge, John W. The American Novel and the Way We Live Now. New York:Oxford University Press,1983. . "The Deceits of Black Humor." Harper's.258.1546 (1979):115-18.
    ---. "The Loony Horror of It All—Catch-22 Turns 25." New York times Book Review.26 Sept.1986:3.
    Aldridge, John. "The Deceits of Black Humor." Harper's.258.1546 (1979):115-18.
    Alison, Ross. The Language of Humor. London & New York:Routeledge,1998.
    Alter, Robert. "The Apocalyptic Temper." Commentary. June.1966:61-66.
    Amis, Martin. "Joseph Heller in Conversation with Martin Amis." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993. 177-84.
    Apte, Mahadev L. "Ethnic Humor Versus'Sense of Humor'." American Behavioral Scientist.30.1 (1987):27-41.
    Armstrong, Tim. Modernism, Technology, and the Body. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1998.
    Attardo, Salvatore. Humorous Texts:A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin & New York:Mouton de Gruyter,2001.
    ---. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin & New York:Mouton de Gruyter,1994.
    Aubrey, James R. "Major-de Coverley's Name in Catch-22." Notes on Contemporary Literature.18.1 (1988):2-3.
    Aubrey, James R., and William E McCarron. "More Shakespearean Echoes in Catch-22." American Notes & Queries.3 (1990):25-27.
    Auden, W.H. "Notes on the Comic." Thought.27 (1952):68-69.
    Baldick, Chris. Concise Dictionary of Literary Terms. Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2003.
    Barnard, Ken. "Joseph Heller Tells How Catch-18 Became Catch-22 and Why He Was Afraid of Airplanes." Detroit News.13 Sept.1970:19,24,27-28,30,65.
    Barnes, Clive. "Theatre:Heller's We Bombed in New Haven Opens." New York Times.17 Oct.1968:51.
    Barth, John. The Friday Book:Essays and Other Nonfiction. Toronto:General Publishing Co. Limited,1984.
    Bayley, Nicholas. York Notes:Catch-22. London:Longman Group UK Limited,1987. Beijing:World Publishing Corporation,1992.
    Becker, Ernest. The Denial of Death. New York:A Division of Macmillan, Inc.,1973.
    Bell, Daniel. "Sensibility in the 60's." Commentary.51.6(1971):63-73.
    Bell, Pearl K. "Heller and Malamud, Then and Now." Commentary.67 (1979):71-75.
    Bergson, Henri. "Laughter." Comedy. Ed. Wylie Sypher, Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.61-190.
    Berryman, Charles. "Heller's Gold." Chicago Review.32.4 (1981):108-18.
    Bertonneau, Thomas. "The Mind Bound Round:Language and Reality in Heller's Catch-22." Studies in American Jewish Literature.15 (1996):29-42.
    Bier, Jesse. The Rise and Fall of American Humor. New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
    Bierman, A.K. "Socratic Humor:Understanding the Most Important Philosophical Argument." Apeiron.5.2 (1971):23-42.
    Billson, Marcus K. Ⅲ. "The Un-Miderbinding of Yossarian:Genesis Inverted in Catch-22." Joseph Heller's Catch-22. Ed. Harold Bloom. Philadelphia:Chelsea House Publishers.2001.121-31.
    Blair, Walter, and Hamlin Hill. America's Humor:from Poor Richard to Doonesbury Oxford:Oxford University Press,1978.
    Bleys, Rudi. The Geography of Perversion:Male-to-Male Sexual Behaviro Outiside the West and the Ethnographic Imagination,1750-1918. New York:New York University Press,1995.
    Blocker, H. Gene. The Metaphysics of Absurdity. Washington D. C.:University Press of America, Inc.,1979.
    Bloom, Harold, ed. Dark Humor. Troy:IBT Global, Inc.,2010. . Joseph Heller's Catch-22. Philadelphia:Chelsea House Publishers,2001.
    Blos, Peter. Son and Father:Before and Beyond the Oedipus Complex. New York and London:A division of Macmillan, Inc. & Collier Macmillan Publishers,1985.
    Blues, Thomas. "The Moral Structure of Catch-22." Studies in the Novel.3.1 (1971):64-79.
    Bodkin, Maud. Archetypal Patterns in Poetry. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1974.
    Boni, John. "Analogous Form:Black Comedy and Some Jacoben Plays." Western Humanities Review.28.3 (1974):201-15.
    Braham, Jeanne. "The Americas:The Fiction of Joseph Heller." Modern Fiction Studies. 36.2 (1990):246.
    Braudy, Susan. "A Few of the Jokes, maybe Yes, but Not the Whole Book." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi, 1994.33-45.
    Brecht, Berthold. Selected Poems. Trans. H. R. Hays. New York:Reynal & Hitchcock, 1947.
    Breton, Andre. Anthology of Black Humor. Trans. Mark Pollizzotti. San Francisco:City Lights Bookstore,1997.
    Brewer, Joseph E. "The Anti-Hero in Contemporary Literature." Iowa English Bulletin.12 (1967):55-60.
    Brifonski, Dedria. War in Joseph Heller's Catch-22. Michigan:Cengage Gale,2009.
    Broges, Luis Jorge. Labyrinths:Selected Stories & Other Writings. New York:New Directions Publishing Corporation,1964.
    Brown, Norman O. Life Against Death. New York:Vintage,1959.
    Brooks, Cleanth. "The Beliefs Embodied in the Work." Storm over the Waste Land. Ed. Robert E. Knoll. Chicago:University of Nebraska Press,1964.57-87.
    Brooks, Mel. "Mel Brooks Meets Joseph Heller." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993.201-9.
    Bruccoli, Matthew Joseph, and Park Bucker. Joseph Heller:A Descriptive Bibliography New Castle, Delaware:Oak Knoll Press,2002.
    Bryant, Jerry H. The Open Decision:The Contemporary American Novel and Its Intellectual Background. New York:Free Press,1970.
    Budge, E.A. Wallies, ed. The Book of the Dead. Seacaucus, N.J.:University Books,1960.
    Bullough, Vern L. "A Defense of the Absurd." Free Inquiry.18.4 (1998):27.
    Burhans, Clinton S. Jr. "Spindrift and Sea:Structural Patterns and Unifying Elements in Catch-22." Twentieth Century Literature.19.4 (1973):239-49. Reprinted in Nagel 1984 and Bloom 2001.
    Burgess, Anthony. "With a Lot of Help from His Friends." New York Times Book Review. 16 Feb.1986:8.
    Cacicedo, Alberto.'"You must remember this':Trauma and Memory in Catch-22 and Slaughterhouse-Five." Critique.46.4 (2005):357-68.
    Cain, E. William. The Crisis in Criticism:Theory, Literature, and Reform in English Studies. Baltimore and London:The Johns Hopkins University Press,1984.
    Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. Trans. Justin O'Brien. New York: Alfred A. Knop,1955.
    Caroline, Jeanne Richardson. "Flies in Their Eyes? A Note on Joseph Heller's Catch-22.' Southern Review.3 (1967):96-105.
    Carroll, Lewis. Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2004.
    Carroll, Lewis. Alice's Adventures in Wonderland:Through the Looking-Glass and The Hunting of the Snark. New York:The Modern Library,1929.
    Carton, Evan. "The Politics of Selfhood:Bob Slocum, T. S. Garp and Auto-American-Biography," Novel:A Forum on Fiction.20.1 (1986):41-61.
    Chapman, Antony, and Hugh Foot, eds. It's a Funny Thing, Humor. Oxford:Pergamon, 1977.
    Charles, Johnson W. Philosophy in Literature (2 vols). Lewiston, New York:The Edwin Mellen Press,1992.
    Cheuse, Alan. "Laughing on the Outside." Studies on the Left.3 (1963):81-87.
    Clark, John R. "Humor in the Nineteenth Century:Decline and Fuel." Mosaic.9.4 (1976): 219-26.
    Clemons, Jack. "Here's the Catch." Writer's Digest.86.5 (2006):80.
    Cohn-Sherbok, Dan. The Paradox of Anti-Semitism. Bodmin, Cornwall:MPG Books, 2006.
    Colletta, Lisa. Dark Humor and Social Satire in the Modern British Novel. New York: Palgrave Macmillan,2003.
    Conte, Joseph. Design and Debris:A Chaotic of Postmodern American Fiction. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press,2002.
    Costa, Richard Hauer. "Notes from a Dark Heller:Bob Slocum and the Underground Man." Texas Studies in Literature and Language.23.2 (1981):159-82.
    Craig, M. David. Tilting at Mortality:Narrative Strategies in Joseph Heller's Fiction. Detroit:Wayne State University Press,1997.
    Currie, Mark. Postmodern Narrative Theory. Houndmills:Macmillan Press, Ltd.,1998.
    Dannatt, Adrian. "Picture This by Joseph Heller (Book Review)." Spectator.261.8365 (1988):45.
    Danto, Arthur C. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1981.
    David, Norman. "Catch-22 and the Language of Discontinuity." Novel:A Forum on Fiction.12.1 (1978):66-77.
    Day, Douglass. "Catch-22:A Manifesto for Anarchists." Carolina Quarterly.15 (1963):86-92.
    Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus:Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis:University of Minneapolis Press,1983.
    Denniston, Constance. "The American Romance-Parody:A Study of Purdy's Malcolm and Heller's Catch-22." ESRS.14.2 (1965):42-59,63-64.
    Davis, Alan. "The Purest Wilderness:Feasting and Fasting in Fiction." Hudson Review. 48.2 (1995):325-32.
    Davis, Douglas M., ed. The World of Black Humor:An Introductory Anthology of Selections and Criticism. New York:E.P. Dutton,1967.
    Delfattore, Joan. "The Dark Stranger in Heller's Something Happened." Critical Essays on Joseph Heller. Ed. James Nagel. Encino, California:Dickenson,1984.127-38.
    Dickstein, Morris. "Something Didn't Happen." Saturday Review.31 Mar.1979:159-82.
    Dickstein, Morris. Gates of Eden:American Culture in the Sixties. New Zealand:Penguin Books,1989.
    Doloff, Steven J. "Heller's Catch-22." The Explicator.53:3 (2007):180-82.
    Doskow, Minna. "The Night Journey in Catch-22." Twentieth Century Literature.12 (1967):186-93.
    Doughterty, D. C. "Nemeses and Macguffins:Paranoia as Focal Metaphor in Stanley Elkin, Joseph Heller, and Thomas Pynchon." Review of Contemporary Fiction.15 (1995): 70-78.
    Downing, Laura Hidalgo. "Negation as a Stylistic Feature in Joseph Heller's Catch-22:A Corpus Study." Style.37.3 (2003):318-41.
    Drabble, Margaret, ed. The Oxford Companion to English Literature. Beijing:Oxford University Press and Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,1998.
    Dundas, Judith. "The Masks of Cupid and Death." Comparative Drama.29.1 (1995):38-60.
    Eisenberg, Lee. "Jewish Questions." Esquire.91 (1979):17-18.
    Eliot, T.S. Selected Essays. New York:Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.,1964. . The Waste Land. New York & London:W. W. Norton & Company,2001.
    Erickson, John D. "Surrealist Black Humor as Oppositional Discourse." Symposium:A Duarterly Journal in Modern Foreign Liteatures.42 (1988):103-4.
    Esslin, Martin. "The Absurdity of the Absurd." Kenyon Review.22.4 (1960):670-73. . The Theatre of the Absurd. New York:Doubleday & Company, Inc.,1961.
    Farber, Jerry. "Toward a Theoretical Framework for the Study of Humor in Literature and the Other Arts." Journal of Aesthetic Education.41.4 (2007):67.
    Farber, Stephen. "Catch-22." Film Reviews.39.4 (1970):218-19.
    Feinberg, Leonard. The Secret of Humor. Amsterdam:Rodopi,1978.
    Fetrow, Fred M. "Joseph Heller's Use of Names in Catch-22." Studies in Contemporary Satire.1.2 (1975):28-38.
    Fiedler, Leslie. Love and Death in the American Novel. New York:Delta,1966.
    Fingarette, Herbert. Death:Philosophical Soundings. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois:Open Court,1996.
    Fleischmann, Wolfgang Bernard, ed. Encyclopedia of World Literature in the 20th Century New York:F. Ungar Pub. Co.,1967.
    Flynn, Thomas R. Existentialism:A Very Short Introduction. Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2008.
    Forman, Seth. Blacks in the Jewish Mind:Crisis of Liberalism. New York:New York University Press,1998.
    Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish:The Birth of the Prison. London:Allen Lane, 1975.
    ---. The Care of the Self:the History of Sexuality Volume Three. London:Allen Lane/ Penguin Press,1988.
    ---. The History of Sexuality,Volume One:An Introduction. London:Allen Lane,1979. . The Use of Pleasure:The History of Sexuality Volume Two. London:Viking,1986.
    Foxhall, Lin. "Pandora Unbound:A Feminist Critique of Foucault's History of Sexuality." Rethinking Sexuality. Eds. H. David Larmour, Paul Allen Miller, and Charles Platter. New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1998.138-70.
    Frank, Mark. "Eros and Thanatos in Catch-22." Canadian Review of American Studies.7.1 (1976):77-87.
    Fremont-Smith, Eliot. "Kvetch-22." Village Voice.5 Mar.1979:74-75.
    Friedman, Bruce Jay. ed. Black Humor. New York:Bantam,1965. "Foreword, Black Humor." Black Humor:Critical Essays. Ed. Alan R. Pratt. New York & London:Garland Publishing Inc.,1993.19-24. "Some Observations:Bruce Jay Friedman Looks Black." Black Humor:Critical Essays. Ed. Alan R. Pratt. New York & London:Garland Publishing Inc.,1993.25-26.
    Friedman, John. "Joseph Heller and the'Real'King David." Judaism.36.3 (1987):296.
    Friedman, Melvin J. "The American Jewish Literary Scene,1979:A Review Essay." Studies in American Fiction.8 (1980):239-46.
    Fromm, Erich. "Selfishness and Self-love." Psychiatry:Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Process.3 (1939):507-23.
    Fry, William F. "Humor and Paradox." American Behavioral Scientist.30.1 (1987):42-73.
    Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism:Four Essays. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1971.
    Galloway, David D. "Clown and Saint:The Hero in Current American Fiction." Critique.7 (1965):46-65.
    Garrick, Jacqueline. "The Humor of Trauma Survivors:Its Application in a Therapeutic Milieu." Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma.12.1/2(2006):169-82.
    Gaukroger, Doug. "Time Structure in Catch-22." Critique.12.2 (1970):70-85.
    Gaut, Berys Nigel. "Just Joking:the Ethics and Aesthetics of Humor." Philosophy and Literature.22.1 (1998):51-68.
    Gay, Peter. Modernism:the Lure of Heresy. New York and London:W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.,2008.
    Gelb, Barbara. "Catching Joseph Heller." New York Times Magazine.4 Mar.1979:14-16.
    Gelber, Norman. "Catch-22 and Sentimentality:A Rebuttal." College English.38.4 (1976): 430-31.
    Glass, Peyton. "Heller's Catch-22." Explicator.36.2 (1978):25-26.
    Glicksberg, Charles I. "The Literature of Absurdity." Western Humanities Review.12 (1958):29-38.
    Gold, Dale. "Portrait of a Man Reading." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993.56-60.
    Goldstein, Jeffrey, and Paul McGhee, eds. The Psychology of Humor. New York: Academic Press,1972.
    Gonzales, Brother Alexis. "Notes on the Next Novel:An Interview with Joseph Heller.' Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1994.91-99.
    Goodman, Paul. Growing Up Absurd. New York:Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. and Random House, Inc.,1960.
    Goodman, Walter. "Heller Contemplating Rembrandt." New York Times.1 Sept.1988: C23.
    Gordon, Jeffrey. "Nagel or Camus on the Absurd." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.45.1 (1984):15-28.
    Graeme Ritchie. The Linguistic Analysis of Jokes. London & New York:Routlege,2004.
    Graves, Robert. The Greek Myths. Baltimore:Penguin Books,1955.
    Green, Daniel. "A World Worth Laughing at:Catch-22 and the Humor of Black Humor." Studies in the Novel.27.2 (1995):186-96.
    ---. "'Terribly Bookish':'Mulligan Stew'and the Comedy of Self-Reflexivity." Critique. 41.3 (2000):237-49.
    Green, Geoffrey. "Joseph Heller:From Your Mouth to God's Ear." Critique—Studies in Contemporary Fiction.51.2 (2010):121-25.
    Green, Robert. "Picturing Heller." Baltimore Jewish Times.21 Oct.1988:56-58.
    Greenfeld, Josh. "22 Was Funnier Than 14." New York Times Book Review.3 Mar.1968: 49-53.
    Greiner, Donald J. "Djuna Barnes'Nightwood and the American Origins of Black Humor." Critique.17.1 (1975):41-54.
    Gross, Beverly.'"Insanity is Contagious':The Mad World of'Catch-22'." The Centennial Review.26.1 (1982):86-113.
    Grossman, Edward. "Yossarian Lives." Commentary.5.8 (1974):78-84.
    Grozinger, Karl-Erich. Kafka and Kabbalah. New York:Continuum,1994.
    Guat, Berys Nigal. "Just Joking:The Ethics and Aesthetics of Humor." Philosophy and Literature.22.1 (1998):51-68.
    Gurewitch, Morton. Comedy:The Irrational Vision. Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1975.
    Gutting, Gary. Foucault:A Very Short Introduction. Oxford:Oxford University,2005.
    Guttmann, Allen. The Jewish Writer in America. New York:New York Oxford University Press,1971.
    Hammond, Norman. Ancient Maya Civilization. New Jersey:Rutgers University Press, 1982.
    Harris, Charles B. Contemporary American Novelists of the Absurd. New Haven:College & University Press,1971. 'John Barth and the Critics:An Overview." Mississippi Quarterly.32.2 (1979):269-83.
    Hart, James D. The Oxford Companion to American Literature. London:Oxford University Press,1998.
    Hauck, Richard. A Cheerful Nihilism:Confidence and "The Absurd" in American Humorous Fiction. Bloomington:Indiana University Press,1971.
    Heller, Joseph. Catch-22. New York:Dell Publishing co., Inc.,1982.
    ---. Catch-22:A Dramatization. New York:Delacorte press,1973.
    ---. Closing Time. New York:Simon & Schuster,1994.
    ---. "Coney Island:The Fun Is Over." Show. July.1962:50-54,103.
    ---. God Knows. New York:Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.,1984.
    ---. Good as Gold. New York:Pocket Books, a Simon & Schuster division of Gulf& Western Corporation,1980. "Humor and the Ability to Create Cannot Be Taught." U.S. News and World Report. 12 Nov.1984:71. "Joseph Heller on America' s 'Inhuman Callousness.'U.S. News and World Report.4 Sept.1979:73.
    ---. "Middle-Aged Innocence." Nation.20 Jan.1962:62-63. .Now and Then:From Coney Island to Here. New York:Alfred A. Knopf,1998. .Picture This. London:Pan Books in Association with Macmillan,1989.
    ---. Portrait of an Artist, as an Old Man. New York:Simon & Schuster,2000.
    ---. Something Happened. New York:Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.,1974. . We Bombed in New Haven. New York:Dell Publishing Co., Inc.,1967. , and Speed Vogel. No Laughing Matter. New York:G. P. Putnam's Sons,1986.
    Heller, Terry. "Notes on Technique in Black Humor." Thalia.2.3 (1978):15. Reprinted in Pratt 1993.
    Henry, G.B. Mck. "Significant Corn:Catch-22." Melbourne Critical Review.9 (1966):138.
    Hitchens, Christopher. "Joseph Heller." The Nation.270.1 (2000):16.
    Hochberg, Herbert. "Albert Camus and the Ethic of Absurdity." Ethics.75.2 (1965):87-102.
    Holland, N. Norman. Laughing:A Psychology of Humor. Cornell:Cornell University Press Ltd.,1982.
    Howard, Stephen. "Oedipus of Thebes:The Myth and Its Other Meanings." American Journal of Psychoanalysis.36.2 (1976):147-54.
    Hasley, Louis. "Black Humor and Gray." Black Humor:Critical Essays. Ed. Alan R. Pratt. New York & London:Garland Publishing Inc.,1993.107-22.
    Hassan, Ihab. "Laughter in the Dark:The New Voice in American Fiction." American Scholar.32 (1964):637.
    Huckabay, Keith. "Black Humor and Theatre of the Absurd:Ontological Insecurity Confronted." Black Humor:Critical Essays. Ed. Alan R. Pratt. New York & London: Garland Publishing Inc.,1993.323-40.
    Hutchinson, Ezzie. "Carcinogenesis:Catch-22." Nature Reviews Cancer.5.2 (2005):87.
    Janoff, Bruce. "Black Humor:Beyond Satire." The Ohio Review.14.1 (1972):5-20.
    Janus, Samuel S. "Humor, Sex and Power in American Society." American Journal of Psychoanalysis.41.2 (1981):161-67.
    Jensen, George H. "The Theatre and the Publishing House:Joseph Heller's We Bombed in New Haven." Proof.5 (1977):183-216.
    Jerome, Judson. "On Decoding Humor:Article." Antioch Review.20.4 (1960):479-93.
    Jones, W.T. Sartre:The Twentieth Century to Wittgenstein and Sartre. New York: Harcourt Brace Jonvanovich College Publishers,1969.
    Karl, Frederick R. "Joseph Heller's Catch-22:Only Fools Walk in Darkness." Contemporary American Novelists. Ed. Haary T. Moore. Carbondale:Southern Illinois University Press,1964.134-42.
    Karst, Roman. "The Reality of the Absurd and the Absurd of the Real:Kafka and Gogol.' Mosaic.9.1 (1975):67-81.
    Kam, Rose. Joseph Heller's Catch-22. Woodbury, N. Y.:Barron's Educational Series,1985.
    Kaplan, Kalman J. "Isaac and Oedipus:A Re-Examination of the Father-Son Relationship." Judaism.39.1 (1990):73-81.
    Kazin, Alfred. "The War Novel:From Mailer to Vonnegut." Saturday Review.6 Feb.1971: 13-15.
    Keegan, Brenda M. Joseph Heller:A Reference Guide. Boston:G. K. Hall,1978.
    Kennard, Jean E. "Joseph Heller:At War with Absurdity." Mosaic.4.3 (1971):75-88.
    Keown, Damien. Buddhism:A Very Short Introduction. New York:Oxford University Press Inc.,1996.
    Kerenyi, C. The Gods of the Greeks. Guildfor, Great Britain:Biddies Ltd.,1979.
    Kermode, Frank. The_Sense of an Ending:Studies in the Theory of Fiction. USA:Oxford University Press, Inc.,1977.
    Kerr, Walter. "Walter Kerr vs. Joseph Heller." New York Times.27 Oct.1968:5.
    Kierkegaard, Soren. Fear and Trembling/Repetition. Trans. Howard v. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1983.
    Kiley, Frederick, and Walter McDonald, eds. A Catch-22 Casebook. New York:Thomas Y. Cromwell,1973.
    Klemtner, Susan Strehle. "A Permanent Game of Excuses:Determinism in Heller's Something Happened." Modern Fiction Studies.24.4 (1978):550-56.
    Klinkowitz, Jerome. "A Final Word for Black Humor." Contemporary Literature-Contemporary Literature.8.2 (1974):217-22.
    Kramer, Michael P., and Hana Wirth-Nesher, eds. Jewish American Literature. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2005.
    Krassner Paul. "An Impolite Interview with Joseph Heller." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993.6-29.
    Kroll, Jack. "All My Sons." Newsweek.28 Oct.1968:135.
    Larmour, H. David, Paul Allen Miller, and Charles Platter, eds. Rethinking Sexuality. New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1998.
    LeClair, Thomas. "Death and Black Humor." Critique.17.1 (1975):5-40. "Joseph Heller, Something Happened, and the Art of Excess." Studies in American Fiction.9 (1981):245-60.
    Lehan, Richard and Jerry Patch. "Catch-22:The Making of a Novel." Minnesota Review.7 (1967):238-44.
    Lester, Elenore. "Playwright-in Anguish." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993.46-50.
    Levine, Paul. "The Politics of Alienation." Mosaic.2.1 (1968):3-17.
    Levin, Harry. Veins of Humor. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1972.
    Lifton, Jay Robert, and Olson Eric. Living and Dying. New York:Praeger Publisher,1974.
    Limon, John. "American Humor in History." American Literary History.21.2 (2009):306-15.
    Lindberg, Stanley W. "One Alternative to Black Humor:The Satire of Jack Matthews." Studies in Contemporary Satire.1 (1974):17-26.
    Lippman, Louis G. "Contextual Connections Within Puns:Effects on Perceived Humor and Memory." Journal of General Psychology.127.2 (2000):185-97.
    Lodge, David. The Modes of Modern Writing. Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1977.
    Lowin, Joseph. "The Jewish Art of Joseph Heller." Jewish Book Annual.43 (1985-1986): 141-53.
    Lyons, Gene. "Contradictory Judaism." The Nation.228 (1979):727-28.
    Mack, Maynard. "The Muse of Satire." New Yorker.41 (1951):85.
    Malin, Irving. "Tilting at Mortality:Narrative Strategies in Joseph Heller's Fiction." Journal of Modern Literature.22.3/4 (1999):513.
    Mandel, George. "Literary Dialogue with Joseph Heller." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993.61-77.
    Martin, Esslin. "The Theater of the Absurd." Theatre in the Twentieth Century. Ed. Robert W. Corrigan. New York:Grove Press,1956.229-44.
    Mandia, Patricia M. "Chimerical Realitties:Black Humor in the Mysterious Stranger." Studies in American Humor.5 (1986):106-17.
    Mann, Thomas. Death in Venice and Other Stories. New York:Bantam Books,1988.
    Martin, G. Neil. "The Effects of Audience Laughter on Men's and Women's Responses to Humor." Journal of Social Psychology.136.2 (1996):221-31.
    McDonald, James L. "I See Everything Twice!:The Structure of Joseph Heller's Catch-22." A Catch-22 Casebook. Eds. Frederick Kiley and Walter McDonald. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell,1973.102-8.
    McElroy, Davis D. Existentialism and Modern Literature. New York:Philosophical Library, Inc.,1963.
    McHale, Brian. Postmodernist Fiction. London and New York:Routledge,1996.
    McHoul, Alec, and Wendy Grace. A Foucault Primer:Discourse, Power and the Subject. Melbourne:Melbourne University Press,1993.
    McKillop, Heather. The Ancient Maya:New Perspectives. Santa Barbara:ABC-CLIO, Inc.,2004.
    McNamara, Eugene. "The Absurd Style in Contemporary American Literature." Humanities Association Bulletin.19 (1968):44.
    Meeker, Joseph W. "The Comedy of Survival." North American Review.257.2 (1972): 11-17.
    Meivale, Patricia.'"One Endless Round':Something Happened and the Purgatorial Novel." English Studies in Canada.6.4 (1985):438-49.
    Mellard, James M. "Catch-22:Deja vu and the Labyrinth of Memory." A Catch-22 Casebook. Eds. Frederick Kiley and Walter McDonald. New York:Thomas Y. Crowell,1973.109-21.
    Merrill, Robert. Joseph Heller. Boston:Twayne Publishers,1987.
    ---. "The Structure and Meaning of Catch-22." Studies in American Fiction.14.2 (1986): 139-52.
    Merrill, Sam. "Playboy Interview:Joseph Heller." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993.144-76.
    Mewshaw, Michael. "Joseph Heller & Louis Falstein." London Magazine.40.11/12 (2001): 65-70.
    Michaels, Leonard. "Bruce Gold's American Experience." New York times book Review. 11. Mar.1979:1,24-25.
    Miller, Arthur. "Why I Wrote The Crucible." The New Yorker.21 Oct.1996:159.
    Miller, J. Hillis. The Ethics of Reading. New York:Columbia University Press,1987.
    Miller, Joseph. Joe Miller's Jests. London:Printed for T. Read and J. Hodges,1739.
    Miller, Walter Jame, and Boonie E. Nelson. Joseph Heller's Catch-22. New York: Macmillan Publishing USA,1998.
    Miller, Wayne C. "Ethnic Identity as Moral Focus:A Reading of Joseph Heller's Good as Gold." MELUS.6.3 (1979):3-17.
    Milne, Victor J. "Heller's Bologniad:A Theological Perspective on Catch-22." Critique. 12.2 (1970):50-69.
    Monk, Donald. "An Experiment in Therapy:A Study of Catch-22." The London Review.2 (1967):12-19.
    Moore, Deborah Dash. At Home in America:Second Generation New York Jew. New York:Columbia University Press,1981.
    Moore, Michael. "Pathological Communication Patterns in Heller's Catch-22." A Review of General Semantics.52.4 (1996):431-39.
    Morreal, John. "The Rejection of Humor in Western Thought." Philosophy East and West. 39.3 (1989):243-66.
    Mulkay, Michael. On Humor:Its Nature and Its Place in Modem Society. Cambridge: Polity Press,1988.
    Mullican, James S. "A Burkean Approach to Catch-22." College Literature.8.1 (1981):42-52.
    Muste, John J. "Better to Die Laughing:The War Novels of Joseph Heller and John Ashmead." Critique.5.2 (1962):16-27.
    Nash, Walter. The Language of Humor. London:Longman,1985.
    Nagel, James. "Catch-22 and Angry Humor:A Study of the Normative Values of Satire." Studies in American Humor.1.2 (1974):99-106.
    ---. "Joseph Heller and the University." College Literature.10.1 (1983):16-27. . "The Catch-22 Note Cards." Joseph Heller's Catch-22. Ed. Harold Bloom. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers,2001.125-36. "Two Brief Manuscript Sketches:Heller's Catch-22." Modern Fiction Studies.20 (1974):221-24.
    --, ed. Critical Essays on Joseph Heller. Encino, California:Dickenson,
    Nagel, Thomas. "The Absurd." The Journal of Philosophy.68.20 (1971):716-27.
    Nasser, Alan G. "Psychoanalysis, Paradigm Shift and Theoretical Reflexivity:The Case of the Oedipus Complex." Psychoanalytic Review.85.2 (1998):225-51.
    Nelson, Thomas Allen. "In Defense of the Grim:A Personal View of the Film Version of Catch-22." Studies in the Humanities. Summer 1971:10-13. "Theme and Structure in Catch-22." Renascence.23.4 (1971):178-82.
    Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Birth of Tragedy And The Genealogy of Morals. Trans. Francis Golffing. New York:Doubleday & Company, Inc.,1956.
    Nolan, Charles J. Jr. "Heller's Small Debt to Hemingway." The Hemingway Review.9.1 (1989):77-81.
    Nordell, Roderick. "Heller's Black Comedy of Society's Errors." Christian Science Monitor.28 Mar.1979:14.
    Novak, William, and Moshe Waldoks, eds. The Big Book of Jewish Humor. New York: Harper & Row,1981.
    O'Connell, Walter E. "Resignation, Humor and Wit." Psychoanalytic Review.51.1 (1964): 49-56.
    O'Connor, William Van. The Grotesque:An American Genre and Other Essays. Carbondale:Southern Illinois University Press,1962.
    Olderman, Raymond M. Beyond the Wasteland:A Study of the American Novel in the Nineteen-sixties. New Haven and London:Yale University Press,1972.
    O'Neill, Patrick. "The Comedy of Entropy:The Contexts of Black Humor." Canadian Review of Comparative Literature.10.2(1983):145-66.
    Orr, Richard. "Flat Characters in Catch-22." Notes on Contemporary Literature.1 Jan. 1971:4.
    Pearson, Carol. "Catch-22 and the Debasement of Language." CEA Critic.38.4 (1974): 30-35.
    Peek, Charles A. Heller's Catch-22 (Cliffs Notes). New York:Cliffs Note,1975.
    Perry, Nick. "Catch, Class and Bureaucracy:The Meaning of Joseph Heller's Catch-22." Sociological Review.32 (1984):719-41.
    Pinsker, Sanford. Between Two Worlds:The American Novel in the 1960's. Troy, N.Y.; Whitston Publishing Company,1980. "Heller's Catch-22:The Protest of a Puer Eternis." Critique.7.2 (1965):150-62. "How'Jewish'is Joseph Heller?" Jewish News.10 Sept.1998:50. "Seeing Heller's Yossarian as a Crypto-Jew:A Critic Considers the Place of Catch-22 in the Pantheon." Forward.31 Dec.1999. June 11 2009 .-. Understanding Joseph Heller. Columbia:the University of South Carolina Press,1991.
    Plant, Bob. "Absurdity, Incongruity and Laughter." Philosophy.84.327 (2009):111-34.
    Plimpton, George. "Joseph Heller." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993.105-17.
    Podhoretz, Norman. Doings and Undoings. New York:Farrar, Straus & Company,1964. "Looking Back at Catch-22." Platinum Periodicals.109.2 (2000):32-37.
    Pogel, Nancy, and William Chamberlain. "Humor into Film:Self Reflections in Adaptations of Black Comic Novels." Literature/Film Quarterly.13.3 (1985):187.
    Potter, Jonathan. "Joseph Heller:A Descriptive Bibliography." Libraries & Culture.40.1 (2005):104-5.
    Potts, Stephen W. Catch-22:Antiheroic Antinovel. Boston:G. K. Hall-Twayne,1989.
    ---. From Here to Absurdity:The Moral Battlefields of Joseph Heller. San Bernardino, California:Borgo Press,1982.
    Pratt, Alan R. Black Humor:Critical Essays. New York & London:Garland Publishing, Inc.,1993.
    Protherough, Robert. "The Sanity of Catch-22." The Human world.3 (1971):59-70.
    Ramsey, Vance. "From Here to Absurdity:Heller's Catch-22." Seven Contemporary Authors:Essays on Cozzens, Miller, Golding, Heller. Albee, and Powers. Ed. Thomas P. Whitbread. Austin:University of Texas Press,1966.97-118.
    Rank, Otto. The Trauma of Birth. New York City:W. W. Norton & Company,1978.
    Raskin, Victor. Semantics Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht:Reidel,1985.
    Raval, Suresh. "Recent Books on Narrative Theory:An Essay Review." Modem Fiction Studies.33.3 (1987):559-70.
    Raymond, Diane. Existentialism and the Philosophical Tradition. London:London Evans Brothers,1983.
    Reilly, Charlie. "An Interview with Joseph Heller." Contemporary Literature.39.4 (1998): 507-22. Reprinted in Sorkin 1993.
    Richler, Noah. "Review of Picture This." Punch.21 Oct.1988:48.
    Richter, David H. Fable's End:Completeness and Closure in Rhetorical Fiction. Chicago & London:The University of Chicago Press,1974.
    Robertson, Joan. "They're After Everyone:Heller's Catch-22 and the Cold War." Clio. 19.1 (1989):41-50.
    Rossi, Louis R. "Albert Camus:The Plague of Absurdity." Kenyon Review.20.3 (1958): 399-422.
    Rovit, Earl. "Review of God Knows." Library Journal.15 Sept.1984:1772.
    Rubin, Louis D. Jr., ed. The Comic Imagination in American Literature. New York:Harper & Row,1977.
    Rubistein, Annette T. The Origin of American Literature. Beijing:Foreign Languages Teaching and Researching Press,1998.
    Ruderman, Judith, and John Friedman. "Joseph Heller and the 'Real' King David." Judaism.36.3 (1987):291-301.
    Ruderman, Judith. "Upside-Down in Good as Gold:Moishe Kapoyer as Muse." Modern Jewish Studies Annual.5.4 (1984):55-63. . Joseph Heller. New York:The Continuum Publishing Company,1991.
    Safer, Elaine B. "The Absurd Quest and Black Humor in Ken Kesey's Sometimes a Great Notion." Critique.24.4 (1983):228-40.
    Sale, Richard B. "An Interview in New York with Joseph Heller." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993. 78-90.
    Sartre, Jean-Paul. Anti-Semite and Jew. Trans. George J. Beckder. New York:Schocken Books, Inc.,1965.
    ---. Being and Nothingness. Beijing:China Social Sciences Publishing House,1999.
    ---. Nausea. Trans. Lloyd Alexander. New York:New Directions Publishing,1962.
    Savu, Laura Elena. "'This Book of Ours':The Crisis of Authorship and Joseph Heller's Portrait of an Artist, as an Old Man." Intertexts.7.1 (2003):71-90.
    Scholes, Robert. The Fabulators. New York:Oxford University Press,1967.
    Schroth, Raymond A. "I Wonder Who's Kissinger Now." Commonweal.106 (1979):284-85.
    Schulz, Max. F. Black Humor Fiction of the Sixties:A Pluralistic Definition of Man and His World. Athens, Ohio:Ohio University Press,1973. "The Unconfirmed Dissertation:Kurt Vonnegut, Black Humor, and Contemporary Art." Critique.12.3 (1971):5-28.
    ---. "Toward a Definition of Black Humor." Black Humor:Critical Essays. Ed. Alan R. Pratt. New York & London:Garland Publishing Inc.,1993.155-74.
    Scoggins, Michael C. "Joseph Heller's Combat Experiences in Catch-22." War, Literature & the Arts.15.1/2:(2003):213-27.
    Scotto, Rober M. Three Contemporary Novelists:An Annotated Bibliography of Works by and About John Hawkes, Joseph Heller, and Thomas Pynchon. New York:Garland, 1977.
    ---. Catch-22:A Critical Edition. New York:Delta,1973.
    Schufreider, Gregory. "The Logic of the Absurd." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.44.1 (1983):61-83.
    Searles, George J. "Something Happened:A New Direction of Joseph Heller." Critique. 18.3 (1977):74-81.
    Sebouhian, George. "From Abraham and Isaac to Bob Slocum and My Boy:Why Fathers Kill Their Sons." Twentieth Century Literature.17 (1981):43-52.
    Seed, David. The Fiction of Joseph Heller:Against the Grain. Hampshire:The MacMillan Press, Ltd.,1989.
    Seltzer, Leon F. "Milo' s 'Culpable Innocence':Absurdity as Moral Insanity in Catch-22." Papers on Language & Literature.15.3 (1979):290-310. Reprinted in Nagel 1984 and Bloom 2001.
    Shapiro, James. "Work in Progress:Joseph Heller, an Interview." Intellectual Digest.2 (1971):6-11.
    Siegel, Ben. The American Writer and the University. Newark:University of Delaware Press,1989.
    Simon, John K. "The Glance of Idiots:The Novel of the Absurd." Yale French Studies.25 (1960):111-19.
    Simpson, Paul. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London:Routledge,1993.
    Sniderman, Stephen L.'"It was All Yossarian's Fault':Power and Responsibility in Catch-22." Twentieth Century Literature.19.4 (1973):251-58. Reprinted in Nagel 1984.
    Solomon, Eric. "From Christ in Flanders to Catch-22:An Approach to War Fiction." Texas Studies in Literature and Language.11 (1969):851-66.
    Solomon, William. "Secret Integrations:Black Humor and the Critique of Whiteness." Modern Fiction Studies.49.3 (2003):469-95.
    Sorkin, Adam J., ed. Conversations with Joseph Heller. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993.
    Stange, Mary Zeiss. "Good God?" USA Today.31 Oct.2005. June 13 2009. http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-10-30-faith-edit x.htm
    Stark Howard J. "The Anatomy of Catch-22." A Catch-22 Casebook. Eds. Frederick Kiley and Walter McDonald. New York:Thomas Y. Crowell,1973.145-58.
    Stern, J.P. "War and the Comic Muse." Comparative Literature.20 (1968):193-216.
    Sternlicht, Sanford. Masterpieces of Jewish American Literature. Beijing:Chinese People University Press,2007.
    Strehle, Susan. "Slocum's Parenthetical Tic:Style as Metaphor in Something Happened.' Notes on Contemporary Literature.7 (1977):9-10.
    ---.'"A Permanent Game of Excuses':Determinism in Heller's Something Happened.1 Modern Fiction Studies.24 (1978-79):550-56.
    Sutton, Walter. Modern American Criticism. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc.,1963.
    Sypher, Wylie, ed. Comedy. Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press,1986.
    Tanner, Tony. City of Words:American Fiction 1950-1970. New York:Harper & Row, 1971.
    Thomas, W.K.'"What Difference Does It Make?':Logic in Catch-22." Dalhousie Review. 50 (1970):488-95.
    ---. "The Mythic Dimension of Catch-22." Texas Studies in Literature and Language.15 (1973):189-98.
    Thorne, Creath. "Joseph Heller:An Interview." Conversations with Joseph Heller. Ed. Adam J. Sorkin. Mississippi:University Press of Mississippi,1993.127-33.
    Tlushkin, Joseph. Jewish Humor:What the Best Jewish Jokes Say About the Jews. New York:William Morrow and Company, Inc.,1992.
    Toman, Marshall. "Good as Gold and Heller's Family Ethic." Studies in American Jewish literature. Fall 1991:210-24.
    Tucker, Lindsay. "Entropy and Information Theory in Heller's Something Happened.' Contemporary Literature.25.3 (1984):323-40.
    Villon, Francois. The Complete Works of Francois Villon. Trans. J. U. Nicolson. New York:Covici-Fried, Inc.,1931.
    Vonnegut, Kurt. Slaughterhouse—Five. New York:The Dial Press,2005.
    Vosevich, Kathi A. "Conversations with Joseph Heller." War Literature and Arts.11.2 (1999):91-102.
    Wain, John. "A New Novel About Old Troubles." Critical Quarterly.5 (1963):168-73.
    Walden, Daniel. "Therefore Choose Life:A Jewish Interpretation of Heller's Catch-22." Critical Essays on Catch-22. Ed. James Nagel. Encino, California:Dickenson,1974. 57-63.
    Waldmeir, Joseph J. American Novels of the Second World War. The Hague:Mouton, 1969.
    Wallace, Ronald. The Last Laugh:Form and Affirmation in the Contemporary American Comic Novel. Columbia:University of Issouri Press,1979.
    Walz, Robin. Modernism. Edinburg:Pearson Education Limited,2008.
    Way, Brian. "Formal Experiment and Social Discontent:Joseph Heller's Catch-22." Journal of American Studies.5.2 (1962):16-27.
    Weber, Brom. "The Mode of'Black Humor'." The Comic Imagination in American Literature. Ed. Louis D. Rubin. New Brunswick:Rutgers University Press,1973.3-16.
    Weinberg, Helen. The New Novel in America:The Kafkan Mode in Contemporary Fiction. Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press,1970.
    Weisenburger, Steven. "Barth and Black Humor." Review of Contemporary Fiction.10.2 (1990):50-55.
    ---. Fables of Subversion:Satire and the American Novel,1939-1980. Athens, London: The University of Georgia Press,1995.
    Weixlmann, Joseph. "A Bibliography of Joseph Heller's Catch-22." Bulletin of Bibliography.31 (1974):32-37.
    Welch, Colin. "A Sense of the Absurd." Spectator.250.8091 (1983):18.
    Werth, Paul. Text Worlds:Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman,1999.
    Weston, Jesse. From Ritual to Romance. Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1993.
    Whitmont, Edward C. The Symbolic Quest:Basic Concepts of Analytical Psycholog Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1969.
    Wieseltier, Leon. "Shlock of Recognition." The New Republic.29 Oct.1984:31-33.
    Wilden, Anthoy. System and Structure:Essays in Communication and Exchange (2nd edition). London:Tavistock Publications,1972.
    Wiley, W Brett. "Cathcart and the Magazine." War Literature and Arts.14 (2002):78-88.
    Williams, Ann Wolensky. Catch-22, Joseph Heller:Curriculum Unit. Westlake, Ohio: Center for Learning,2005.
    Wink, Diane M. "The Catch-22 of Whistleblowing." The American Journal of Nursing. 84.1 (1984):19.
    Winston, Mathew. "Black Humor:To Weep with Laughing." Black Humor:Critical Essays. Ed. Alan R. Pratt. New York & London:Garland Publishing inc.,1993.249-68.
    Wisse, Ruth R. "Jewish American renaissance." The Cambridge Companion to Jewish American Literature. Eds. Hana Wirth-Nesher and Michael P. Kramer. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press,2003.
    Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford:Blackwell,1974.
    Woodson, Jon. A Study of Joseph Heller's Catch-22:Going Around Twice. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.,2001.
    Worcester, David. The Art of Satire. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1940.
    Young, Robert M. "Deadly Unconscious Logics in Joseph Heller's Catch-22." The Seventh Annual Conference on Psychoanalysis and the Public Sphere:'Losing and Finding Values'. University of East London, England. November 1993.
    Young, Thomas Daniel, ed. The New Criticism and After. Charlottesville, VA:The University Press of Virginia,1976.
    Zippin, David. "Sex Differences and the Sense of Humor." Psychoanalytic Review.53.2 (1966):45-55.
    Zolten, J. Jerome. "Joking in the Face of Tragedy." Black Humor:Critical Essays. Ed. Alan R. Pratt. New York & London:Garland Publishing inc.,1993.303-12.
    柏格森著:《笑》,徐继增译,北京:北京十月文艺出版社,2005年。
    厄内斯特.贝克尔著:《反抗死亡》,林和生译,贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1988年。
    成梅:“海勒末年自画像《老年艺术家画像》综论,”《西安电子科技大学学报(社科版)》,2002年第4期,第47-51页。
    成梅:“《第二十二条军规》之续集《终了时刻》综论,”《四川外语学院学报》,2002年第3期,第38-41页。
    成梅:“种族与名利场:《像戈尔德一样好》研究,”《西安电子科技大学学报(社科版)》,2007年第1期,第116-122页。
    查尔士·B·哈里斯著:《文学传统的背叛者——美国当代荒诞派小说家》,仵从巨,高原译,西安:陕西人民出版社,1987年。
    查尔斯·鲁亚斯主编:《美国作家访谈录》,粟旺等译,北京:中国对外翻译出版公司,1995年。
    常耀信主编:《美国文学批评名著精读》,天津:南开大学出版社,2006年。
    陈永国著:《海勒》,成都:四川人民出版社,2003年。
    褚蓓娟:“存在之‘重’:论余华和海勒长篇小说主题的同质性,”《长江大学学报(社科版》,第2006年第6期,第44-47页。
    褚蓓娟:“海勒笔下的女性,” 《安徽师范大学学报(社科版)》,2006年第4期,第429-432页。
    褚蓓娟:“后现代与经典解构——以《上帝知道》为个案,” 《陕西师大学报》2006年第3期,第61-64页。
    褚蓓娟著:《解构的文本——海勒和余华长篇小说研究》,合肥:安徽人民出版社,2007年。
    丹尼尔·霍夫曼主编:《美国当代文学(上)》,王逢振等译,北京:中国文艺联合出版公司,1984年。
    恩斯特·贝克尔著:《拒斥死亡》,林和生译,北京:华夏出版社,2001年。
    冯霞: “从道德角度解读《第二十二条军规》,” 《山东文学》,2008年第12期,第57-58页。
    佛克马·伯斯顿主编: 《走向后现代主义》,王宁等译,北京:北京大学出版社,1991年。
    弗·斯卡皮蒂著: 《美国社会问题》,刘泰星、张世灏译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1986年。
    傅景川著: 《二十世纪美国小说史》,长春:吉林教育出版社,1995年。
    郭昌瑜:“论黑色幽默小说的社会文化背景和哲学蕴含,” 《成都大学学报(社科版)》,1991年第2期,第43-47页。
    郭继德: “黑色幽默与约瑟夫·海勒,” 《四川外语学院学报》,2001年第5期,第20-22页。
    郭继德主编: 《美国文学研究》(第一辑).济南:山东大学出版社,2002年。
    郭继德主编: 《美国文学研究》(第二辑).济南:山东大学出版社,2004年。
    郭继德主编: 《美国文学研究》(第三辑).济南:山东大学出版社,2006年。
    郭继德主编: 《美国文学研究》(第四辑).济南:山东大学出版社,2008年。
    郭继德主编: 《美国文学研究》(第五辑).济南:山东大学出版社,2010年。
    郭继德著: 《20世纪美国文学:梦想与现实》,北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2004年。
    加缪著: 《西西弗的神话》,杜小真译,天津:天津人民出版社,2007年。
    井洪丹,护甲英: “黑色幽默语篇的情景语境——以《第二十二条军规》语篇为例,”《边疆经济与文化》,2009年第1期,第99-100页。
    克里斯多夫·拉著: 《自恋主义文化》,陈红雯,吕明译,上海:上海文化出版社,1988年。
    雷红琴: “论黑色幽默独创的艺术情感模式,”《外国文学研究》,1998年第1期,第43-47页。
    李新元,朱瑞青: “黑色幽默文学的反小说形式解析,” 《山东师大外国语学院学报》,2002年第3期,第57-60页。
    李亚白: “死亡与荒诞——谈《第二十二条军规》的死亡主题,”《语文学刊》,1992年第3期,第25-29页。
    刘保瑞等译: 《美国作家论文学》,北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店出版社,1984年。
    刘海平,王守仁主编:《新编美国文学史》(第四卷),上海:上海外语教育出版社,2002年。
    刘洪一著:《走向文化诗学:美国犹太小说研究》,北京:北京大学出版社,2004年。
    罗晓云:“‘紧闭的门’——海勒小说《出事了》解读,”《镇江师专学报(社科版)》,1996年第1期,第53-55页。-:“精心建构的混乱——析《第二十二条军规》,”《镇江师专学报(社科版)》,1994年第1期,第35-39页。
    南平:“‘黑色幽默’初探:一种大难临头时的幽默,” 《外国文学研究》,1986年第4期,第4页。
    宁宓用: “约瑟夫·海勒及其新作《出事了》,”《国外文学》,1992年第1期,第182-191页。
    钱满素主编: 《美国当代小说家论》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1987年。
    萨特著: 《存在主义是一种人道主义》,周熙良译,上海:上海译文出版社,1999年。
    萨特著: 《他人就是地狱:萨特自由选择论集》,关群德等译,天津:天津人民出版社,2007年。
    史志康主编: 《美国文学背景概观》,上海:上海外语教育出版社,1998年。
    唐文: “对《上帝知道》中父子关系的诠释,”《作家杂志》,2008年第5期,第93页。
    唐文: “关于血统的‘意识分裂’的尴尬审美,” 《山东文学》,2008年第10期,第200-203页。
    唐文: “谈《第二十二条军规》对经典神话的解构,” 《东岳论丛》,2009年第2期,第162-164页。
    唐文: “再议《第二十二条军规》的道德观,” 《华章》,2010年第8期,第32-35页。
    汪小玲著: 《美国黑色幽默小说研究》,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2006年。
    王士红: “用福柯的权力理论解读海勒的《第二十二条军规》,” 《重庆工学院学报》,2007年第12期,第116-119页。
    王卓: “美国黑色幽默小说与存在主义,” 《济南大学学报》,2001年第6期,第62-65页。
    王祖友: “我国学者对海勒的解读和接受——纪念约瑟夫·海勒逝世10周年,”《外语研究》,2009年第3期,第108-111页。
    文楚安著: 《“垮掉一代”及其他》,成都:四川大学出版社,2002年。
    吴泽庆: “约瑟夫·海勒作品中的无形见有形,” 《世界文学评论》,2006年第2期,第177-179。
    杨国华著: 《现代派文学概说》,上海:华东师范大学出版社,1989年。
    杨仁敬著: 《美国后现代派小说论》,青岛:青岛出版社,2004年。
    耶日·科萨克著: 《存在主义的大师们》,王念宁译,北京:中央编译出版社,2003年。
    殷仪著: 《幽默文学面面观》,上海:上海社会科学院出版社,1989年。
    于可主编: 《世界三大宗教及其流派》,长沙:湖南人民出版社,1988年。
    约瑟夫·海勒著: 《得过且过》,郭国良,赵婕译,杭州:浙江文艺出版社,2006年。
    约瑟夫·海勒著: 《第二十二条军规》,扬恝,程爱民,邹惠玲译,南京:译林出版社,2007年。
    约瑟夫·海勒著: 《最后一幕》,王约西,袁凤珠译,南京:译林出版社,1997年。
    叶拉美: “从《这幅画》看海勒的历史观,”《深圳大学学报(社科版)》,2006年第3期,第107-110页。
    曾繁仁主编: 《20世纪欧美文学热点问题》,北京:高等教育出版社,2005年。
    赵乐牲主编: 《西方现代派文学与艺术》,长春:时代文艺出版社,1986年。
    周静怡主编: 《美国黑色幽默小说欣赏》,广州:华南理工大学出版社,2006年。
    朱立元主编: 《当代西方文艺理论》,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2003年。
    朱振武主编: 《美国小说本土化的多元因素》,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2006年。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700