医源性输尿管损伤后梗阻形成机制及其防治的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:构建输尿管损伤动物模型,筛选输尿管损伤后纤维化进程中敏感的组织标志物并探索其波动情况,研究卡托普利对阻断输尿管损伤后纤维化的意义。
     材料与方法:以成年雄性新西兰兔为实验对象,构建输尿管热损伤后狭窄动物模型。通过RT-PCR技术,于损伤后2周、3周及4周动态测定EGF、TGF-β、FN、Col Ia1、Col Ia2及Col Ⅲ在受累输尿管中的表达水平,与对侧正常输尿管组织对比,寻找较为敏感的纤维化指标,并探索不同指标表达高峰时间。设置卡托普利组(实验组)与对照组,干预组予复方卡托普利10mg/Kg/d口服,对照组予安慰剂。给药2周取患侧输尿管狭窄段及对侧2cm正常输尿管。通过RT-PCR技术分别测定实验组与对照组患侧输尿管与对侧正常输尿管EGF、TGF-β、Col Ia1、 Col Ia2及FN水平,对比干预组与实验组各指标上升幅度。
     结果:动物模型构建成功。在动物模型构建过程中,测得EGF、TGF-β、FN、 Col Ia1及Col Ia2较对侧正常输尿管组织显著升高(p<0.01)。其中,EGF、TGF-β、 Col Ial高表达期均为输尿管损伤后2周,而FN与Col Ia2高表达期分别为损伤后3周与损伤后4周。在卡托普利干预研究中,实验组EGF、Fn及Col Ia2表达量较对照组显著降低(p<0.05);而TGF-β与Col Ial表达量较对照组无显著差异(p=0.18,p=0.58)。
     结论:在众多细胞因子中,EGF、TGF-β、Col Ia1、Col Ia2及FN在输尿管瘢痕形成中起重要作用。其表达高峰主要为损伤后2周,而2周之后仍有不同的细胞因子参与纤维瘢痕的终末期构建。卡托普利可部分阻断输尿管损伤后的纤维化进程,降低EGF、Col Ia2及FN表达,而对TGF-β与Col la的表达抑制作用不明显,因此未来还需进一步研究阐明更完整的输尿管纤维化调控通路,从而为进一步临床干预提供线索。
Purpose:To establish a reliable animal mode of the ureteral injury and to screen the sensitive markers of the fibrotic process after the ureteral injury. Make clear the fluctuation characteristic of the different sensitive makers during the tissue scarring and evaluate the anti-fibrotic role of Captopril.
     Materials and methods:The New Zealand rabbit was taken to establish the animal model of ureteral injury. The EGF, TGF-β, FN, Col Ial, Col Ia2and Col III of the impaired ureter and the contralateral normal ureter were quantified by RT-PCR technique to find out the sensitive biomarkers of the ureteral fibrosis. The fluctuation of the markers during2to4weeks was also noted. A Captopril group and a control group were set to evaluate the anti-fibrotic efficacy of this medication in ureteral fibrosis. The Captopril10mg/Kg/d was given in experimental group while the placebo was given in control group. The specimens were harvest2weeks after the intervention and the RT-PCR was carried out.
     Result:The ureteral injury animal mode was established successfully. By RT-PCR screening, EGF, TGF-β, FN, Col Ial and Col Ia2were found to be significantly elevated than the other markers.(p<0.01) The peak level of EGF, TGF-β and Col Ial appeared at2weeks after the injury while for Fn and Col Ia2the peak level appeared at3weeks and4weeks after the surgery, respectively. For the Captopril experimentation, the expression of EGF, Fn and Col Ia2in Captopril group was significantly lower than control group. However, there was no statistic significance for TGF-B and Col Ial between the two groups.
     Conclusion:EGF, TGF-β, Col Ial, Col Ia2and FN seemed to have important role in the ureteral fibrosis and scarring after the ureteral lesion. The peak of the fibrosis was at2weeks after the injury. The Captopril might partially inhibit the fibrotic process by blocking the EGF, Col Ia2and FN pathway. Further research work should be carried out to clarify the ureteral fibrotic network, which may offer new clinical methods to prevent the ureteral scarring.
引文
1. Mariotti G, Natale F, TrucchiA, et al. Ureteral injuries during gynecologic procedures. Minerva Urol Nephrol,1997,49(2):95-98.
    2. Assimos DG, Patterson LC, Taylor CL. Changing incidence and etiology of iatrogenic ureteric injuries. J Urol,1994; 152 (6):2240.
    3. Adzick NS, Lorenz HP. Cell, matrix, growth factor, and the surgeon:the biology of scarless fetal wound repair. Ann Surg,1994;220(1):10-18.
    4. Shokeir AA, El-Diasty T, Eassa W, et al. Diagnosis of ureteral obstruction in patients with compromised renal function:the role of noninvasive imaging modalities. J Urol, 2004;171:2303-2306.
    5. Razda NS, Silberstein IK, Bagley DH. Ureteroscopic endoureterotomy. BJU Int,2005; 95(sp2):94-101.
    6. Hong HJ, Jeon SS, Lee KS. Result of endoscopic ureteroureterostomy with holium YAG laser for complete ureteral obstruction. J Endourol,2005; 19 (8):979-983.
    7. Lane BR, Desai MM, Hegarty NJ, et al. Longterm efficacy of holium laser endoureterotomy for benign ureteral strictures. Urology,2006;67 (5):894-897.
    8. Laszlo N, O'Briain DS, Puri P. Demonstration of neuronal networks in the human upper tract using confocal laser scanning microscopy.J Urol,2001;166:255-258.
    9. Rolle U, Andersen HL, Puri P, et al. Innervation of congenitally hydronephrotic and normal porcine upper urinary tract. BJUI,2002;89:566-570.
    10. Carr RA, Newman J, Antonakopulus GN, et al. Lesions produced by the extravasation of urine from the upper urinary tract. Histopathology,1997;30(4):335-340.
    11. Pintilie RA, Grigorovici M. Experimental study regarding the ureteral cicatrization pattern in rabbit. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi,2008;113(2):449-454.
    12. Andreoni C, Lin H, Olweny E et al. Comprehensive evaluation of ureteral healing after electrosurgical endopyelotomy in a porcine model:original report and review of the literature. J Urol,2004;171:859-869.
    13. Chin GS, Liu W, Peled Z, et al. Differential expression of transforming growth factor-b receptor Ⅰ and Ⅱ and activation of Smad 3 in keloid fibroblasts. Plastic Recons Surg, 2001; 108 (2):423.
    14. Cecchetti W, Zattoni F, Nigro F et al. Plasma bubble formation induced by holmium laser:an in vitro study. Urology,2004;63 (3):586-590.
    15. Conesa S, Palanco S, Laserna JJ. Acoustic and optical emission during laser induced plasma formation. Spectrochimica Acta Part B,2004;59 (6):1395-1401.
    16. Lapides J and Caffrey E L.Observation on healing of ureteral muscle:relationship to intubated ureterotomy. J Urol,1955;73:47.
    17. Mandhani A, Kapoor R et al. Is a 2-week duration sufficient for stenting in endopyelotomy? J Urol,2003;169:886-889.
    18. Tredget EE, Nedelec B, Scott PG, et al. Hypertrophic scars, keloids, and contractures: The cellular and molecular basis for therapy. Surg Clin North Am, 1997;77(3):701-730.
    19. Morris DE, Wu L, Zhao LL, et al. Acute and chronic animal models for excessive dermal scarring:quantitative studies. Plast Reconstr Surg.1997;100(3):674-81
    20. Kyung HK, Hyun CK, Mee YH et al. The antifibrotic effect of TGF-b1 siRNAs in murine model of liver cirrhosis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications,2006;343:1072-1078.
    21. Zhang Z, Li X, Liu Y, et al. Recombinant human decorin inhibits cell proliferation and down-regulates TGF-b1 production in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts. Burns,2007;33:634-611.
    22. Yen HC, Wan LC, Shun SC et al. Expression of transforming growth factor-b1 and its receptors related to the ureteric fibrosis in rat model of obstructive uropathy. Urol,2000;163:1298-1303.
    23. Liu J, Li S et Ji S. Pathological scars in the connective tissue growth factor gene expression. Repair and reconstruction of the Chinese Journal Surgery,2003,17(6):436-438.
    24. Mulsow J, Watson W, Fitzpatrick J, et al. Transforming growth factor-β promotes pro-fibrotic behavior by serosal fibroblasts via PKC and ERK1/2 mitogen activated protein kinase cell signaling. Ann Surg,2005;242:880-889.
    25. Ono I, Yamashita T, Hida T, et al. Local administration of hepatocyte growth factor gene enhances the regenenration of dermis in acute incisional wounds. Surg Res,2004;120(6):47-55.
    26. Karakeili AG, Satriano C, Gumudereli lu M,et al. Enhancement of fibroblastic proliferation on chitosan surfaces by immobilized epidermal growth factor. Acta Biomater,2008;4 (4):989-996.
    27. Zoppi N, Barlati S, Colombi M. FAK-independent α-β3 integrin-EGFR complexes rescue from anoikis matrix-defective fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta,2008; 1783 (6):1177-1188.
    28. Satish L, Babu M, Tran KT, et al. Keloid fibroblast responsiveness to epidermal growth factor and activation of downstream intracellular signaling pathways. Wound Repair Regen,2004;12 (2):183-192.
    29. Lee AR. Enhancing dermal matrix regeneration and biomechanical properties of 2nd degree-burn wounds by EGF-impregnated collagen sponge dressing. Arch Pharm Res.2005; 28 (11):1311-1316.
    30. Marchand AS, Plantier L, Bernuau D, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor expression by fibroblasts in pulmonary fibrosis:poor response to interleukin-lbeta. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol,2005,32(5):470-477.
    31. Ceridono M, Belleudi F, Ceccarelli S, et al. Tyrosine 769 of the keratinocyte growth factor receptor is required for receptor signaling but not endocytosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun,2005;327(2):523-532.
    32. Bates CM. Role of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling in kidney development. Pediatr Nephrol,2007;22(3):343-349.
    33. Chua AW, Gan SU, Ting Y, et al. Keloid fibroblasts are more sensitive to Wnt3a treatment in terms of elevated cellular growth and fibronectin expression. J Dermatol Sci.2011;64(3):199-209.
    34. Lygoe KA, Wall I, Stephens P, et al. Role of vitronectin and fibronectin receptors in oral mucosal and dermal myofibroblast differentiation.Biol Cell. 2007;99(11):601-614.
    35. Thomas DW, Oneilll D, Harding KG, et al. Cutaneous wound healing:a current perspective. J Oral Maxil lof ac Surg,1995;53:442-447.
    36. Steckelings UM, Wollschlager T, Peters J, et al. Human skin:source of and target organ for angiotensin. Exp Dermatol,2004; 13(3):148-154.
    37. Takeda H, Katagat AY, Hozumi Y, et al. Effects of angiotensin receptor signaling during skin wound healing. Am J Pathol,2004; 165(5):1653-1662.
    38. Steckelings UM, Henz BM, Wiehstutz S, et al. Differential expression of angiotensin receptors in human cutaneous wound healing. Br J Dermatol,2005;153 (5):887-893.
    39. Mahmoud G, Ali M, Masoud S, et al. Antifibrotic effect of captopril and enalapril on paraquat-induced lung fibrosis in rats. J Appl Toxicol,2007; 27:342-349.
    40. Kim MY, Baik SK, Park DH, et al. Angiotensin receptor blockers are superior to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the suppression of hepatic fibrosis in a bile duct-ligated rat model. J Gastroenterol,2008; 43:889-896.
    41. Wu H, Liu H, Cheng B,et al. Effect of angiotensin Ⅱ receptors on collagen synthesis of fibroblasts derived from human hypertrophic scars. J Clin Rehab Tis Eng Re, 2009;13(11):234-241.
    42. Kawaguchi Y, Takagi K, Hara M, et al. Angiotensin in the lesional skin of systemic sclerosis patients contributes to tissue fibrosis via angiotensin type 1 receptor. Arthritis Rheum,2004; 50(1):216-226.
    43. Li W, Ye Y, Fu B, et al. Genetic deletion of AT2 receptor antagonizes angiotensin-induced apoptosis in fibroblasts of mouse embryo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun,1998; 250 (1):72-76.
    44. Lee C, Guh J, Chen H, et al. Advanced glycation end-product-induced mitogenesis and collagen production are dependent on angiotensin Ⅱ and connective tissue growth factor in NRK-49F cells. J Cell Biochem,2005;95:281-292.
    45. Peng H, Carretero O, Vuija N, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors:A new mechanism of action. Circulation,2005;112:2436-2445.
    46. Pimentel J, Sundell C, Wang S, et al. Role of angiotensin II in the expression and regulation of transforming growth factor-a in obstructive nephropathy. Kidney Int,1995;48:1233-1246.
    47. Shirazi M, Khezri A, Samani S, et al. Effect of intraurethral captopril gel on the recurrence of urethral stricture after direct vision internal urethrotomy:Phase II clinical trial. Int J Urol,2007;14:203-208.
    1. Mariotti G,Natale F, TrucchiA, et al. Ureteral injuries during gynecologic procedures [J].Minerva UrolNephrol,1997,49 (2):95-98
    2. 彭萍,沈铿.妇科手术泌尿道损伤42例临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2002,10(37):595-597.
    3. Liapis A, Bakas P, Giannopoulos V, et al. Uerteral injuries during gynecological surgery [J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,2001,12 (6):391-394.
    4. Assimos D G, Patterson L C, Taylor C L Changing incidence and etiology of iatrogenic ureteric injuries [J] J Urol,1994,152 (6):2240
    5.周四维.输尿管损伤.吴阶平泌尿外科学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2008:842-846.
    6. Haverstock BD. Hypertrophic scars and keloids [J]. Clin Podiatr Med Surg,2001,18: 147
    7. Shahram Aarabi, Michael T Longaker, Geoffrey C Gurtner. Hypertrophic Scar Formation Following Burns and Trauma:New Approaches to Treatment[J]. PLoS Med, 2007,4:234-256
    8. Kyung HK,Hyun CK,Mee YH et al. The antifibrotic effect of TGF-b1 siRNAs in murine model of liver cirrhosis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications,2006:343:1072-1078
    9. Zhang Z, Li X, Liu Y, et al. Recombinant human decorin inhibits cell proliferation and downregulates TGF-b1 production in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts. Burns,2007;33:634-611
    10. Liu Jian-yi, Li Shi-rong, Ji Shu-xing. Pathological scars in the connective tissue growth factor gene expression [J].Repair and reconstruction of the Chinese Journal Surgery,2003,17(6):436-438
    11. Yen HC, Wan LC, Shun SC et al. Expression of transforming growth factor-b1 and its receptors related to the ureteric fibrosis in rat model of obstructivr uropathy.[J] Urol,2000;163:1298-1303
    12. Mulsow J, Watson W, Fitzpatrick J, et al. Transforming growth factor-_ promotes pro-fibrotic behavior by serosal fibroblasts via PKC and ERK1/2 mitogen activated protein kinase cell signaling. Ann Surg,2005;242:880-889Kim M, Baik S, Park D, et al.
    13. Ono I, Yamashita T, Hida T, et al. Local administration of hepato-cyte growth factor gene enhances the regenenration of dermis in acute incisional wounds [J].Surg Res,2004,120(6):47-55.
    14. Mahmoud G, Ali M, Masoud S, et al. Antifibrotic effect of captopril and enalapril on paraquat-induced lung fibrosis in rats. J Appl Toxicol,2007; 27:342-349
    15. Angiotensin receptor blockers are superior to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the suppression of hepatic fibrosis in a bile duct-ligated rat model. J Gastroenterol,2008; 43:889-896
    16. Lee C, Guh J, Chen H, et al.Advanced glycation end-product-induced mitogenesis and collagen production are dependent on angiotensin Ⅱ and connective tissue growth factor in NRK-49F cells. J Cell Biochem,2005;95:281-292
    17. Peng H, Carretero O, Vuija N, et al.Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors:A new mechanism of action. Circulation,2005; 112:2436-2445
    18. Pimentel J, Sundell C, Wang S, et al. Role of angiotensin Ⅱ in the expression and regulation of transforming growth factor-a in obstructive nephropathy. Kidney Int,1995;48:1233-1246
    19. Shirazi M, Khezri A, Samani S, et al. Effect of intraurethral captopril gel on the recurrence of urethral stricture after direct vision internal urethrotomy:Phase Ⅱ clinical trial. Int J Urol,2007; 14:203-208
    20. Wu Heng-chun, Liu Hong-wei, Cheng Biao,et al. Effect of angiotensin II receptors on collagen synthesis of fibroblasts derived from human hypertrophic scars[J] Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research,2009 13(11)
    21. Karakeili AG, Satriano C, Gumuderelio lu M, Marletta G. Enhancement of fibroblastic proliferation on chitosan surfaces by immobilized epidermal growth factor[J]. Acta Biomater,2008 Jul,4 (4):989-996.
    22. LinksZoppi N, Barlati S, Colombi M. FAK-independent α-β3 integrin-EGFR comp lexes rescue from anoikismatrix-defective fibroblasts[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2008,1783(6):1177-1188.
    23. Satish L, Babu M, Tran KT, Hebda PA, Wells A. Keloid fibroblast responsiveness to epidermal growth factor and activation of downstream intracellular signaling pathways[J]. Wound Repair Regen,200412 (2):183-192.
    24. LinksLee AR. Enhancing dermalmatrix regeneration and biomechanical properties of 2nd degree-burn wounds by EGF-imp regnated collagen sponge dressing[J]. Arch PharmRes.2005;28(11):1311-1316.
    25. Pierce GF, Mustoe TA, Altrock BW, et al. Role of platelet-derived growth factor in wound healing [J]. J Cell Biol Chem,1991,45(4):319-326.
    26. Wang J,Jiao H,Stewart TL,et al. Improvement in postburn hypertrophic scar after treatment with IFNa2b is associated with decreased fibrocytes [J]. J InterferonCytokine Res,2007,27 (11):921
    27. Zhang XF,Li HY,Lu KH,et al. Signal roles of protein tyrosine kinase in t ransforming growth factor-β1, or interferon-y regulated proliferation and collagen synthesis by fibroblasts from hypertrophic scar and normal dermis [J]. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi,2005,21 (1):36.
    28. Tredget EE, Shankowsky HA, Pannu R,et al. Transforming growth factor-β in thermally injured patients with hypertrophic scars:effect s of IFNa2b [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,1998,102(5):1317
    29. Lee J P Jalili RB,Tredget EE,et al. Antifibrogenic effects of liposome-encapsulated IFN-α2b cream on skin wounds in a fibrotic rabbit ear model [J]. J Interferon Cytokine Res,2005,25 (10):627.
    30. Pochareon VN, Berman B. New therapies for the management of keloids [J]. J Craniofac Surg,2003,14:654.
    1. Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Nita G, Mirciulescu V, Cauni V. Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures:a single-center experience. J Endourol. 2006 Mar;20(3):179-85.
    2. 吴开俊,杨运彰,陈白平.输尿管镜直视下取石术3年经验.中华泌尿外科杂志,1989(10):242-244
    3. Librenjak D, Situm M, Gugic D, Milostic K, Duvnjak M.Ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral stones--influence of operator's experience and skill on the procedure outcome. Croat Med J.2011 Feb 15;52(1):55-60.
    4. Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Nita Gh, Mirciulescu V, Cauni V, Aghamiri S. Complications after 2272 retrograde ureteroscopies:A single-center experience. Presented at the 27th congress of the SocietE International d'Urologie. BJU Int 2004:94(suppl 2):278
    5. Lyon ES, Banno JJ, Schoenberg HW. Transurethral ureteroscopy in men using juvenile cystoscopy equipment. J Urol.1979 Aug; 122(2):152-3.
    6. Leijte JA, Oddens JR, Lock TM. Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: predictive factors for complications and success. J Endourol.2008 Feb;22(2):257-60.
    7. W.J. Harmon, P.D. Sershon and M.L. Blute et al., Ureteroscopy:current practice and long-term complications, J Urol.157 (1997), pp.28-32
    8. F. Francesca, V. Scattoni and L. Nava et al., Failures and complications of transurethral ureteroscopy in 297 cases:Conventional rigid instruments vs. small caliber semirigid ureteroscopes, Eur Urol.28 (1995), pp.112-115.
    9. Li FP, Wang LZ, Lu ZW, Wu SJ, Zhang XJ, Zhang WG, Ke M, Yu HY, Wang TJ, Sun FH, Cai XG. Preventive strategies and causes of common complications of ureteroscopy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi.2009 Dec 29;89(48):3417-9.
    10. Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ, Wolf JS Jr. Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol.2001 Aug; 166(2):538-40.
    11. Fuganti PE, Pires S, Branco R, Porto J. Predictive factors for intraoperative complications in semirigid ureteroscopy:analysis of 1235 ballistic ureterolithotripsies. Urology.2008 Oct;72(4):770-4.
    12. Aridogan IA, Zeren S, Bayazit Y, Soyupak B, Doran S. Complications of pneumatic ureterolithotripsy in the early postoperative period. J Endourol.2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):50-3.
    13. G.F. Daniels Jr, J.E. Garnett and M.F. Carter, Ureteroscopic results and complications: Experience with 130 cases, J Urol.139 (1988), pp.710-713.
    14. X. Martin, A. Ndoye and P.G. Konan et al., Hazards of lumbar ureteroscopy:apropos of 4 cases of avulsion of the ureter, Prog Urol.8 (1998), pp.358-362
    15. A.J.M. Alapont, R.E. Broseta and M.J.L. Pontones et al., Complications of uretero-renoscopy, Actas Urol Esp.29 (2003), pp.692-699. A. Morgentaler, S.S. Bridge and S.P. Dretler, Management of the impacted ureteral calculus, J Urol.143 (1990), pp.263-266
    16. S. Mugiya, M. Nagata and T. Un-No et al., Endoscopic management of impacted ureteral stones using a small caliber ureteroscope and a laser lithotriptor, J Urol.164 (2000), pp.329-331
    17. L. Su and E.R. Sosa, Campbell's Urology (8th ed.), WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA (2002), pp.3306-3319.
    18. R.M. Scarpa, A. De Lisa and D. Porru et al., Large benign prostatic hyperplasia means impossible ureteroscopy:myth or reality?, Eur Urol.37 (2000), pp.381-385
    19.陈文彬孟宪涛张伟玲刘建震李辉刘军平崔书平.硬性输尿管镜联合钬激光碎石术治疗反复发作肾绞痛38例.白求恩军医学院学报2005,3(3):133-134
    20. Farbirovich VIa, Andreichuk ME. Ureteropyeloscopy and contact ureterolithotripsy in pregnancy. Urologiia.2008 Jul-Aug;(4):52-3.
    21. Dasgupta P, Cynk MS, Bultitude MF, Tiptaft RC, Glass JM. Flexible ureterorenoscopy: prospective analysis of the Guy's experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl.2004 Sep;86(5):367-70.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700