语音训练对英语听力理解的影响分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在近几年的国内外听力研究领域,许多学者提出了新的外语听力研究理念,例如听力策略研究、图式理论研究等,这些研究关注的是听力材料的背景知识补充、听力理解过程中的预测和总结等技巧、以及情感控制等。本文认为这些归根结底都是听力理解中的非语言因素,没有触及听力理解的本质。与以上研究不同,本文从“自下而上”模式出发,探索提高英语听力理解的新方法,即在大学英语听力教学中加入一些基础语音知识的讲授和语音训练,以促进学生听力水平的提高。
     为检验基础语音知识的讲授和语音训练在听力教学中的作用,本研究就语音知识在提高学生听力水平方面的效果进行了一次实验。实验以南京航空航天金城学院2006级2个班级为研究对象,分别标为实验班和控制班。学期开始时对两个班分别进行了实验前听力测试,并对两个班的测试成绩进行了差异性检验。结果显示两个班在实验前听力测试中不存在显著性差异。实验中,实验班的听力授课以基础语音知识的训练与课本练习相结合的方法开展;控制班的听力讲授方法则为单一的课本练习。为期一学期的听力课程结束后,两班分别参加了实验后听力测试。通过对他们的实验后听力测试成绩进行的差异性检验,发现实验后两班的成绩存在显著性差异,且实验班成绩优于控制班。该实验说明英语听力课堂教学中基础语音知识的讲授和训练确实有助于学生英语听力水平的提高,并且发现语音训练对英语试题中的听写部分影响比较大,对话和短文部分影响相对较小。
     本次研究虽然只是一项探索性研究,但依然对大学英语听力教学有一定的启示。
In the research of listening teaching, scholars emphasize the significance of supplementing background knowledge to the learners. Some assert that listening strategies are helpful to the enhancement of listening ability. These studies mainly concern such non-linguistic factors as background knowledge, emotion, predicting, monitoring. These studies focus on the peripheral part of listening by investigating how these factors affect listening instead of touching the essence of listening itself. They can only have an assistant and compensatory effect on listening comprehension.
     The present study, based on the theory of bottom-up processing, attempted to find a method to promote English learner's listening comprehension. The author treated the phonetic knowledge as basic in listening comprehension. Meanwhile, to test if the teaching and training of the basic phonetic knowledge worked in improving students' listening ability, the author had done an experiment on the effectiveness of explicit phonetic instruction in improving the students' listening proficiency. In the experiment, two classes of sophomores were enrolled and labeled as an experimental class and a control class, consisting of 72 and 69 students respectively. At the initial stage, a pre-experiment listening test was given to all the research subjects. The statistics of the scores of the pre-test indicated that no significant difference had existed between the two classes, which meant the two separate classes had just been standing at a similar English listening level before the phonetic instruction was conducted. Then the experimental class was taught by combining the course book with systematic explanation of the basic phonetic knowledge and phonetic training involved in the listening materials,while the control class was taught in the traditional teaching method without any interpretation of the phonetic knowledge. After a semester's treatment a post-experiment listening test was conducted for all the subjects.
     Through the statistical analysis of the scores in the post-test, it was proved that there was a significant difference between the experimental class and the control class. The former class was better than the latter one, which meant that the training in the basic phonetic knowledge in the listening class did help the students improve their listening proficiency. Phonetic training had great impact on dictation part but had little influence on the conversation part and passage one.
     Having summarized the results of the experiment, the author, from the perspective of phonetics, put forward some suggestions for the teaching of English listening in the final chapter with the expectation of providing some help for the College English teaching.
引文
1. Brown, G. The Nature of Comprehension. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1997(11, 36-43.
    2. Brindley, G & D. Nunnan. Draft Band Scales for Listening, IELTS Project. Project National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, 1992.
    3. Brown, H. Douglas. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001.
    4. Bacon, S. M. The Relationship between Gender, Comprehension, Processing Strategies, and Cognitive and Effective Response in Foreign Language Listening. The Modern Language Journal, 1992 (76), 160-178.
    5. Cohen, Andrew D. Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.
    6. Cervantes, R. The Effects of Syntactic Simplification and Repetition on Listening Comprehension, TESOL Quarterly, 1990(76), 767-770.
    7. Chauduon, C. Simplification of Input: Topic Reinstatements and their Effects on L2 Learners' Recognition and Recall. TESOL Quarterly, 1983(17), 437-458.
    8. Carrell, P. L & Eisterhold, J. Schema Theory and ESL Reading Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 1983(23), 647-678.
    9. Carroll, D.W. Psychology of Language. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.
    10. Celce-Murcia, M. Principles Practice in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
    11. Field John. Skills and Strategies: Towards a New Methodology for Listening. ELT Journal. 1998 (18), 251-257.
    12. Graham, S. Learner Strategies and Advanced Level Listening Comprehension. Language Learning Journal, 2003 (28), 64-69.
    13. Hedge, T. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2002.
    14. Jones, Daniel. An Outline of English Phonetic. Sichuan: Sichuan Education Press ,1987,
    15. Ji Lingzhu. Listening Activities for Effective Top-down Processing. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. IX, No. 11, 2003.
    16. Jensen, P & C. Hansen. The Effect of Prior Knowledge on EAP Listening–Test Performance. Language Testing, 1995 (12), 99-119.
    17. Kenneth, C. Developing Second Language Skills: Theory to Practice. Houghton Mifflin Company. The Center for Curriculum Development, INC, 1976.
    18. Morley, J. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers, 1991.
    19. MacCarthy, Pete A.D. English Pronunciation: A Practical Handbook for the Foreign Learner. Cambridge: W. Heffer&Sons Ltd, 1950.
    20. McDonough S.H. Learner strategies. Language Teaching, 1999 (32), 1-18.
    21. Nunan, David. Second Language Teaching and Learning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001.
    22. Nunan, D. Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers, 1999.
    23. O'Malley, J. Chamot & L. Kupper. Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Langrage Acquisition. Applies Linguistics, 1999(10), 418-437.
    24. Oxford, Rebecca L. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. USA: Newbury House Publishers, 1990.
    25. Richards, J. The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
    26. Richards, J. Listening Comprehension: Approach, Design, and Procedure. TESOL Quarterly. 1983(17), 219-239.
    27. Rivers, W. M. Teaching Foreign Language Skills (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.
    28. Ridway, T. Listening Strategies-I Beg your Pardon? ELT Journal, 2000 (54), 179-185.
    29. Rumelhart, D. E. Introduction to Human Information Processing. New York: Wiley, 1977.
    30. Stanovich, K. Toward an Interactive Compensatory Model of Individual Differences in the Development of Reading Fluency. The Reading Teacher, 1980(16), 32-71.
    31. Tyler, L. & P. Warren. Local and Global Structure in Spoken Language Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 1987 (26): 638-657.
    32. Tsui, Amy B. M & John Fullilove. Bottom-up or Top-down Processing as a Discriminator of L2 Listening Performance. Applied Linguistics, 1998(19), 432-451.
    33. Ur, P. Teaching Listening Comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
    34. Van Duzer, Carol. Improving ESL Learner's Listening Skills. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 1997.
    35. Vanderplank, R. Implications of Differences in Native and Non-native Speaker Approaches to Listening. British Journal of Language Teaching, 1988(26), 32-41.
    36. Voss, B. Slips of the Ear. Investigations into the Speech Perception Behavior of German Speaker English. Turbingen: Narr, 1984.
    37. Wallace, C. Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
    38. Wedell, Martin. Language Teaching and Learning: From Theory to Practice. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1995.
    39. Dujia. [杜建].听音理解过程和听力评估方法.《外语教学与研究》, 1992(4):47-51.
    40. Huang,Zidong.[黄子东].话语熟悉程度,语言水平和问题类型EFL听力理解的影响.一项基于图式理论和关联理论的实验研究,《现代外语》,1998(4):18-43.
    41. Huang, Hebin. [黄和斌].《外语教学理论与实践》.南京:译林出版社, 2001.
    42. Guo, Ruizhi. [郭瑞芝].语言学:语音与听力玄机透视.《外语与外语教学》, 2003(3):56-58.
    43. Li, Dongmei. [李冬梅].近十年来国内英语听力理解研究述评.《外语界》, 2002(2):30-34.
    44. Luli. [卢莉].理查兹论英语听力教学材料的设计.《外语与外语教学》, 2000(5):38-41.
    45. Lu, Minxia. [陆敏霞].试论英语朗读与听说能力的提高.《扬州大学学报》(高教研究版), 2001(3):50-53.
    46. Qian, Guolian. [钱冠连].音感召唤.《外语学刊》, 1990(5):38-42.
    47. Sun, Yuefen. [孙悦芬].语音学知识与听力教学.《大学英语》, 1998(8):34.
    48. Wangwei. [王伟].英语听力训练中的听力要素及听力障碍.《解放军外国语学院学报》, 1991(1):27-35.
    49. Wang, Shouyuan, et al. [王守元、苗兴伟.英语听力教学的理论和方法.《外语电化教学》, 2003(4):17-19.
    50. Wu, Wuyu. [吴武瑜].加强听力训练是培养交际能力的关键.《山东外语教学》,1990(3):74.
    1. Yangqian. [杨茜].大学英语听力教学探索和实践.《外语界》, 2002(2):59-61.
    2. Zhu, Zhongyan. [朱忠焰].大学英语听力教学模式与方法初探.《外语界》,2000(2):46-50.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700