污泥水煤浆的基础特性、脱硫特性以及锅炉燃烧特性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着城市化进程的加速和环境保护意识的加强,城市污水的处理率逐渐提高,城市污泥的产生量将逐渐增长,如何妥善、科学地处理这些污泥,已成为目前全球共同关注的问题。本文将两种城市污泥分别与煤粉混合(质量比为1:6)磨制污泥水煤浆,在前人研究的基础上主要开展了以下几个方面的研究:
     1)在实验室内进行污泥水煤浆的成浆性,流变性以及热分析试验,结果表明污泥水煤浆在分散剂添加量为1.2%,稳定剂添加量0.1%时能得到良好的污泥水煤浆产品,表观粘度符合国家水煤浆技术标准。热分析试验结果表明污泥水煤浆较普通水煤浆有较低的着火温度,但是燃烧稳定性略有下降,从综合燃烧特性指数来看污泥水煤浆的S值高于普通水煤浆,说明其燃烧性能更好。
     2)研究了不同固硫剂对污泥水煤浆流变性的影响,结果表明污泥水煤浆中加入固硫剂后,对污泥水煤浆流变性的影响不大,仍属假塑性流体,但浆体粘度增加。Ca(OH)_2对浆体粘度影响大于CaCO_3,Ca/S比应控制在1.5以下为宜;同时在水平管式炉上进行了污泥水煤浆的燃烧脱硫试验,结果显示本试验条件下污泥水煤浆燃烧固硫的最佳钙硫摩尔比为1.5。
     3)在浙江大学3.2MW卧式炉上对污泥水煤浆与大同水煤浆进行了对比燃烧试验,分析了煤浆的燃烧特性、结渣特性以及污染物排放特性,结果显示污泥水煤浆燃烧状况较理想,效果不亚于大同烟煤水煤浆。结渣情况不严重,灰渣沉积速率为61.54 g·m~(-2)min~(-1),低于灰分含量较低的大同烟煤水煤浆。污泥水煤浆排烟中SO_2和NO_x的浓度分布为1038 mg/m~3和1118 mg/m~3,处于较高的水平,这主要与原精煤和污泥中硫及氮含量相对较高有关。污泥水煤浆燃烧后重金属进入大气的份额一般在10%-40%之间,Hg属于强挥发性元素份额较高,为77.84%。
The treatment rate of municipal wastewater is increasing with the acceleration of urbanization and and reinforcement of environmental awareness. Thus, the amount of sewage sludge production is increasing How to treat the sludge properly and scientifically has become a common concern. In this paper, two kinds of municipal sewage sludge and coal are mixed (the mass mixing ratio of sludge/coal is 1/6) and milled to prepare the sludge coal water slurry. Based on the previous relevant research, the experimental research of coal water slurry is focused on the following aspects:
     Firstly, the basic characteristics of sludge coal water slurry such as slurribility、rheology and thermal analysishave been studied, the results showed that the sludge coal water slurry could be a good product when the dispersant ratio was 1.2% and the stabilizer ratio was 0.1%. Moreover the rheology could meet the standards of state technical specification of coal water mixture. The results indicated that the ignition temperature of S-CWS was about 10℃~20℃lower than ordinary CWS. Nevertheless, the combustion stability declined. According to comprehensive burning index S, the combustion characteristics of S-CWS were better than that of CWS.
     Secondly, the effect of the kinds of sorbents on the slurribility characteristics of sludge coal water slurry had been analyzed. The results showed that sulfur-retention agent had little effect on the rheology of S-CWS, which still appeared as pseudoplastic fluid. Nevertheless, the viscosity of S-CWS increases. The influence of CaCO_3 on the rheological behavior of S-CWS is less than that of Ca(OH)_2, the Ca/S molar ratio should be controlled below 1.5. At the same time, tests of combustion of sludge coal water slurry (S-CWS) were conducted in a fixed bed oven. The results showed that the optimum Ca/S molar ratio of sludge coal water slurry (S-CWS) should be 1.5 under experimental conditions.
     Thirdly, combustion contrasting test of sludge coal water slurry and Datong coal water slurry were conducted in 3.2MW furnace. Combustion characteristics, slagging characteristics and pollutant emission characteristics were researched. The results showed that the combustion of S-CWS was satisfactory, which is better than Datong bituminous coal-water slurry. The slagging situation was not serious, and the ash deposition rate was 61.54gm~(-2) min~(-1), which was lower than the Datong CWS. The concentration distribution of SO_2 and NO_x in flue gas was 1038 mg/m and 1118 mg/m~3 respectively, which were at high level. The conversion rate of heavy metals into the flue gas was not high, and the share was usually among 10%40%.However, Hg is strong volatile element and the conversion rate of fuel-Hg to gaseous state have reached 77.84%.
引文
[1]国家统计局.中国统计年鉴1996,北京:中国统计出版社,1996
    [2]黄盛初.2006年中国煤炭发展报告[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2007
    [3]倪维斗,陈贞,李政.我国能源现状及某些重要战略对策[J].中国能源,2008,12(30):5-9
    [4]岑可法等.水煤浆燃烧、流动、传热和气化的理论与应用技术[M].浙江大学出版社,1994,10
    [5]师雄.城市污泥处置方法概述[J].河北理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,230(1):128-132
    [6]Oleszkiewicz J A,Mavinic D S.Wastewater biosolids:an overview of processing,treatment and management[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,2001,28:102-114.
    [7]丘锦荣,吴启堂,卫泽斌.城市污泥干燥研究进展[J].生态环境,2007,16(2):667-671
    [8]陈萍丽,赵秀兰.城市污泥特征及其资源化利用[J].微量元素与健康研究,2006,23(1):54-56
    [9]Edstentiford.Sludge composting-trend and opportunities.W&WT,November,1995,38(11)
    [10]Dogru M,Midilli A,Howarth C R,et al.Gasification of sewage sludge using a throated downdraft gasifier and uncertainty analysis[J].Fuel Processing Technology,2002,75:55-82.
    [11]Gupta R,Garg V K.Stabilization of primary sewage sludge during vermicomposting[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,153(3):1023-1030.
    [12]Cui H,Ninomiya Y,Masui M,et al.Fundamental behaviors in combustion of raw sewage sludge[J].Energy Fuels,2006(1):77-83.
    [13]Shao J,Lee D H,Yan R,et al.Agglomeration characteristics of sludge combustion in a bench-scale fluidized bed combustor[J].Energy Fuels,2007.21(5):2608-2614.
    [14]吴成军,段钰锋,赵长遂,等.循环流化床内污泥与煤混烧时汞的浓度和形态分布[J].动力工程,2008,28(2):308-313.
    [15]Miller B B,Kandiyoti R,Dugwell D R,et al.Trace element behavior during co-combustion of sewage sludge with Polish coal[J].Energy Fuels,2009,18(4):1093-1103
    [16]张辰.污泥处理处置技术研究进展[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005,5-7
    [17]Lundin M,Olofsson M,Pettersson G,Zetterlund H.Environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge handling options.Resource Conservat Recycl 2004,41:255-278
    [18]D Fytili,A Zabaniotou.Utilization of sewage sludge in EU application of old and new methods-A review[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2008(12):116-140
    [19]甘义群.城市污泥热解特性及资源化利用新方法试验研究.中国地质大学博士学位论文,2005,8-10
    [20]尹军,谭学军,廖国盘.我国城市污水污泥的特性与处置现状[J].中国给水排水,2003,19(13):21-24
    [21]余杰,田宁宁,王凯军等.中国城市污水处理厂污泥处理、处置问题探讨分析[J].环境工程学报,2007,1(1):82-86
    [22]赵旗.水煤浆的应用与展望[J].陶瓷,2004,3:45-47
    [23]乔英云,田原宇,黄伟.水煤浆技术的基础研究进展[J].山西能源与节能,2005,4:14-16
    [24]冯云岗.脱硫型水煤浆的成浆及脱硫特性研究[J].浙江大学硕士学位论文,2006,1-2
    [25]李毅,杨公训,高松.水煤浆锅炉的发展及现状[J].热能动力工程,2007,22(6):583-585
    [26 惠世恩等.煤的洁净利用与污染防治[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2008,123-124
    [27]李安.水煤浆技术发展现状及其新进展[J].煤炭科学技术,2007,35(5):97-100
    [28]詹隆.水煤浆产业化发展与展望[J].煤炭加工与综合利用,2003,5:31-35
    [29]李洪波,詹隆.水煤浆产业化技术经济分析[J].洁净煤技术,2001,7(3):27-30
    [30]范浩杰,章明川,胡国新等.水煤浆与煤粉燃烧脱硫比较[J].燃烧科学与技术,2000,6(1):48-50
    [31]高明峰,王祖讷.小型锅炉水煤浆燃后电除尘的试验研究[J].中国矿业大学学报2005,34(2):188-193
    [32]翁卫国,周俊虎,杨卫娟.220t/h水煤浆锅炉NOx排放特性的研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2006,40(8):1440-1442
    [33]董若凌.水煤浆再燃降低NOx的机理及试验研究,2006,浙江大学博士论文,53-54
    [34]黄波.水煤浆固硫剂[D].北京:中国矿业大学(北京校区),2003:75-78.
    [35]姚强,范浩杰,曹欣玉等.脱硫型水煤浆燃烧脱硫的机理研究[J].煤炭学报,1996,21(6):540-543
    [36]姚强,范浩杰,曹欣玉等.脱硫型水煤浆燃烧脱硫的试验研究[J].煤炭学报,1996,21(4):438-441
    [37]程军.炉内高温燃烧两段脱硫的机理研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2002,1
    [38]刘国光,郑立庆,吕文英.氧化铜对钙基化合物固硫作用影响的初步研究[J].河南师范 大学学报(自然科学版),2000,28(2):50-54
    [39]陈占文,马瑞欣,石常省.脱硫型水煤浆脱硫特性的研究[J].洁净煤技术,2009,15(1):44-46
    [40]黄波,段静,朱书全.氧化铁和氧化钛对水煤浆燃烧固硫的促进作用[J].煤炭工程,2005,5,74-76
    [41]刘国光,郑立庆,吕文英等.氧化铜对钙基化合物固硫作用影响的初步研究[J].河南师范大学学报(自然科学版)2000,28(2):50-54
    [42]黄波,朱书全,章丽萍等.影响水煤浆燃烧固硫的主要因素[J].选煤技术,2004,4:60-63
    [43]范浩杰.粉煤燃烧与水煤浆燃烧脱硫比较研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,1997,85-88
    [44]王利珍,杨祥生,陈荣荣等.水煤浆稳定性的影响因素的研究进展[J].煤化工,2007,6,55-59
    [45]李桂春,高振森,梁均台等.水煤浆稳定性定量测量的研究[J].煤炭技术,1997,3,26-28
    [46]支献华.水煤浆稳定性的影响因素及评定方法[J].煤炭加工与综合利用,2000,1,38-40
    [47]冉宁庆,戴郁菁,朱光,等.亚甲基萘磺酸-苯乙烯磺酸-马来酸盐对水煤浆的分散作用研究(J].南京大学学报(自然科学),1999,35(5):643-647
    [48]刘明华.水煤浆添加剂的制备及应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007,54
    [49]刘宝林,孔珑.水煤浆流动特性及其流变模型确定方法综述[J].煤化工,1995,73(4):49-53
    [50]李珊珊,程军,李艳昌等.水煤浆黏度的几种影响因素分析[J].煤炭转化,2006,29(1):23-26
    [51]Mishra S K,Kanungo S B.Factors affecting the preparation of highly concentrated coal-water slurry(HCCWS)[J].Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research,2000,59(10):765-790
    [52]冉宁庆,戴郁菁,朱光等.NDF对水煤浆的分散作用的研究[J].南京大学学报,1999,35(5):643-647
    [53]赵雪飞,姜雅丽.水煤浆流变性的研究[J].水利采煤与管道运输,1997,2:20-23
    [54]赵国华,段枉锋,徐峰等.高浓底水煤浆流变特性和德定性试脸研究[J].热能动力工程,2008,23(2):201-205
    [55]但盼,邱学青,周明松.温度及剪切时间对水煤浆表观黏度及流变性影响[J].煤炭科学技术,2008,36(6):103-106
    [56]裘伯钢.污泥资源化处置与综合利用[J].环境保护科学,2006,32(5):36-39
    [57]丘锦荣,吴启堂,卫泽斌等.城市污泥干燥研究进展[J].生态环境,2007,16(2):667-671
    [58]Coats A W.Redfern J P.Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data[J].Nature,1964,201(1):68-69
    [59]陈镜泓,李传儒.热分析及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1985:120-127
    [60]姜秀民,郑楚光等.粉煤颗粒粒度对燃烧特性影响热分析[J].中国电机工程学报,2002,22(12):142-160
    [61]陈震,段清兵,肖卫等.冰脱硫型水煤浆的制备及特性[J].煤炭加工与综合利用,2005,6:40-43
    [62]刘建忠,冯云岗,张光学等.钙基固硫剂对水煤浆性能影响的研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2006,26(21):99-103
    [63]黄波,木沙江,段静等.钙基固硫剂对水煤浆流变性的影响[J].中国煤炭,2004,30(6):44-45
    [64]唐海香,张荣曾,徐志强.水煤浆燃烧脱硫剂优选的探讨[J].华北科技学院学报,2008,5(1):31-33
    [65]Mishra,S K,Senapati,P K,Panda,D.Rheological behavior of coal-water slurry[J].Energy Sources,2002,24(2):159-167
    [66]Tiwari,Kaushal K,Basu,Sibendra K,Bit,Kumaresh C,et al.High-concentration coal-water slurry from Indian coals using newly developed additives[J].Fuel Processing Technology,2004,85(1):31-42
    [67]Turian,Raft M,Attal,Jamel F,Sung,Dong-Jin,et al.Properties and theology of coal-water mixtures using different coals[J].Fuel,2002,81(16):2019-2033

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700