新疆喀纳斯自然保护区植物群落物种多样性及动态特征研究
|
摘要
对喀纳斯国家级自然保护区植物群落类型、结构、物种多样性、群落动态以及土壤因子与群落物种多样性指数之间的关系进行了调查研究。
1.群落调查共发现高等植物171种,蕨类植物两种。在所有调查群落中,单种属科较多。植物的分布区类型以旧世界温带分布种和北极分布种占有明显优势。维管束植物生活型以地面芽植物占绝对优势。
2.按照《中国植被》分类单位的划分标准,将喀纳斯国家自然保护区自然植被划分为6个植被型组,12个植被型,37个群系组或群系。在调查了代表性植物群落样方的基础上,采用双向指示种分析法(TWINSPAN)对所调查群落进行了数量分类。TWINSPAN将57个样方分为11组,结合区域内群落物种组成、生境等方面的特征,将所调查植物群落划分为4个植被型组,18个群系或群系组。
3.对于森林群落,在不同垂直分层中,各垂直层多样性指数之间差异显著,Shannon-Wiener指数、Margalef吻种丰富度指数和Pielou均匀度指数Jh都是草本层最大,Simpson指数则是草本层最小。物种多样性指数和均匀度指数在群落间变异系数表现为乔木层和灌木层较大。不同类型的群落之间多样性指数差异不显著。
4.研究了不同强度旅游干扰对本区森林、草甸和灌丛的群落物种组成、物种多样性以及土壤理化性质的影响。结果表明：1)在不同强度的干扰下,云杉林中灌木层与草本层物种组成存在显著差异(p<0.05),随着干扰强度的增大,群落物种多样性呈先上升后下降的变化；2)草甸群落Shannon-Wiener多样性指数随干扰强度的增大有下降趋势；3)金露梅群落在不同的干扰强度下,群落优势度、均匀度和土壤理化性质均因旅游干扰而显著降低(p<0.05)：4)土壤理化性质的改变在一定程度上也改变了群落的物种多样性。
5.对河漫滩湿地植物群落进行了调查取样,通过除趋势对应分析(detrended correspondence analysis, DCA)排序研究了群落演替的动态和方向,同时分析了物种多样性在群落演替过程中的动态变化,并运用去势典范对应分析(detrended canonical correspondence analysis, DCCA)方法,分析了不同样方中土壤因子与群落多样性指数之间的关系。结果表明：1)该区域植物群落演替序列为泽生苔草群落→西伯利亚早熟禾群落→金露梅群落→沼桦群落→西伯利亚云杉群落；2)随着演替的进行,群落物种优势度显著增加,而物种多样性呈先增加后降低的趋势,金露梅群落最高；3)土壤含水量和群落物种优势度之间存在显著负相关关系。
Plant community type、structure, species diversity, community dynamics and the relationship between soil factors and species diversity have been studied in Kanas Nature Reserve for the first time.
1. In the community survey we totally found 171 species of higher plants and two kinds of ferns. In all investigated communities, single species families holded a larger majority. The Old World Temperate Zone and Arctic species distribution dominated in the type of plant distributions. The life form of hemicryptophyte is reign supreme in all vascular plant.
2. Accordance with the classification principle of the China Vegetation, in the Kanas National Nature Reserve, the vegetation is divided into six vegetation type groups,12 vegetation types,37 formation groups or formations. The vegetation in Kanas Nature Reserve were sampled and investigated. A quantitative classification of the plant communities was performed with TW1NSPAN(Two Way Indicator Species Analysis)method. The results showed that 57 quadrates were divided into 11 groups, the vegetation in Kanas Nature Reserve were divided into 4 vegetation types and 18 formations. The characteristics of communities were also described in detail.
3. The results of the species diversity index analysis of the 18 kinds of plant community types in Kanas showed that 1) the diversity index in different vertical layer for forest communities are significant difference, Shannon-Wiener index, Margalef species richness index and Pielou evenness index Jh are the largest in herb layer, Simpson index is the smallest in herb layer; 2) The coefficient variation of the species diversity index in the arbor layer and shrub layer are larger than the herb layer among forest communities; 3) The species diversity index among different communities were not significant different.
4. The different disturbance of tourism on the species composition, species diversity and soil in the Picea obovata communities, meadow and Potentilla fruticosa communities in Kanas Nature Reserve were studied. The results showed that the species composition of the shrub layer and herb layer were affected significantly by tourist disturbance in the P. obovata communities, and the species diversity was decreased and then increased slightly with increasing of the tourist disturbance. In meadow community, the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H) was trended down with the increasing of disturbance. As for P. fruticosa community, Simpson index (D) and Pielou index (Jd), and the soil fertility were decreased noteblely by disdurbance of tourism. The changes of physicochemical characteristics of soil influenced the species diversity of communities.
5. The floodplain wetlands which located on north end of Kanas lake were surveyed and DCA (detrended correspondence analysis) ordination technique was employed to clarify the dynamics and direction of community succession, meanwhile, the Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Margalef's richness index, Simpson's diversity index and Pielou's evenness index were introduced to analyze the dynamics of species diversity in community succession. The relationship between soil factors and species diversity were also analyzed by using DCCA (detrended canonical correspondence analysis). The results showed that 1) the successional sequence of plant communities in this region was community Carex melanostachya→community Poa sibirica→community Potentilla fruticosa→community Betula humilis→community Picea obovata; 2) Along wtih the succession progressed, the species dominance increased significantly, while species diversity increased first and then showed a falling trend, with a peak at phase of community Potentilla fruticosa; 3) there is significant negative correlation between water content of soil and species dominance.
1.群落调查共发现高等植物171种,蕨类植物两种。在所有调查群落中,单种属科较多。植物的分布区类型以旧世界温带分布种和北极分布种占有明显优势。维管束植物生活型以地面芽植物占绝对优势。
2.按照《中国植被》分类单位的划分标准,将喀纳斯国家自然保护区自然植被划分为6个植被型组,12个植被型,37个群系组或群系。在调查了代表性植物群落样方的基础上,采用双向指示种分析法(TWINSPAN)对所调查群落进行了数量分类。TWINSPAN将57个样方分为11组,结合区域内群落物种组成、生境等方面的特征,将所调查植物群落划分为4个植被型组,18个群系或群系组。
3.对于森林群落,在不同垂直分层中,各垂直层多样性指数之间差异显著,Shannon-Wiener指数、Margalef吻种丰富度指数和Pielou均匀度指数Jh都是草本层最大,Simpson指数则是草本层最小。物种多样性指数和均匀度指数在群落间变异系数表现为乔木层和灌木层较大。不同类型的群落之间多样性指数差异不显著。
4.研究了不同强度旅游干扰对本区森林、草甸和灌丛的群落物种组成、物种多样性以及土壤理化性质的影响。结果表明：1)在不同强度的干扰下,云杉林中灌木层与草本层物种组成存在显著差异(p<0.05),随着干扰强度的增大,群落物种多样性呈先上升后下降的变化；2)草甸群落Shannon-Wiener多样性指数随干扰强度的增大有下降趋势；3)金露梅群落在不同的干扰强度下,群落优势度、均匀度和土壤理化性质均因旅游干扰而显著降低(p<0.05)：4)土壤理化性质的改变在一定程度上也改变了群落的物种多样性。
5.对河漫滩湿地植物群落进行了调查取样,通过除趋势对应分析(detrended correspondence analysis, DCA)排序研究了群落演替的动态和方向,同时分析了物种多样性在群落演替过程中的动态变化,并运用去势典范对应分析(detrended canonical correspondence analysis, DCCA)方法,分析了不同样方中土壤因子与群落多样性指数之间的关系。结果表明：1)该区域植物群落演替序列为泽生苔草群落→西伯利亚早熟禾群落→金露梅群落→沼桦群落→西伯利亚云杉群落；2)随着演替的进行,群落物种优势度显著增加,而物种多样性呈先增加后降低的趋势,金露梅群落最高；3)土壤含水量和群落物种优势度之间存在显著负相关关系。
Plant community type、structure, species diversity, community dynamics and the relationship between soil factors and species diversity have been studied in Kanas Nature Reserve for the first time.
1. In the community survey we totally found 171 species of higher plants and two kinds of ferns. In all investigated communities, single species families holded a larger majority. The Old World Temperate Zone and Arctic species distribution dominated in the type of plant distributions. The life form of hemicryptophyte is reign supreme in all vascular plant.
2. Accordance with the classification principle of the China Vegetation, in the Kanas National Nature Reserve, the vegetation is divided into six vegetation type groups,12 vegetation types,37 formation groups or formations. The vegetation in Kanas Nature Reserve were sampled and investigated. A quantitative classification of the plant communities was performed with TW1NSPAN(Two Way Indicator Species Analysis)method. The results showed that 57 quadrates were divided into 11 groups, the vegetation in Kanas Nature Reserve were divided into 4 vegetation types and 18 formations. The characteristics of communities were also described in detail.
3. The results of the species diversity index analysis of the 18 kinds of plant community types in Kanas showed that 1) the diversity index in different vertical layer for forest communities are significant difference, Shannon-Wiener index, Margalef species richness index and Pielou evenness index Jh are the largest in herb layer, Simpson index is the smallest in herb layer; 2) The coefficient variation of the species diversity index in the arbor layer and shrub layer are larger than the herb layer among forest communities; 3) The species diversity index among different communities were not significant different.
4. The different disturbance of tourism on the species composition, species diversity and soil in the Picea obovata communities, meadow and Potentilla fruticosa communities in Kanas Nature Reserve were studied. The results showed that the species composition of the shrub layer and herb layer were affected significantly by tourist disturbance in the P. obovata communities, and the species diversity was decreased and then increased slightly with increasing of the tourist disturbance. In meadow community, the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H) was trended down with the increasing of disturbance. As for P. fruticosa community, Simpson index (D) and Pielou index (Jd), and the soil fertility were decreased noteblely by disdurbance of tourism. The changes of physicochemical characteristics of soil influenced the species diversity of communities.
5. The floodplain wetlands which located on north end of Kanas lake were surveyed and DCA (detrended correspondence analysis) ordination technique was employed to clarify the dynamics and direction of community succession, meanwhile, the Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Margalef's richness index, Simpson's diversity index and Pielou's evenness index were introduced to analyze the dynamics of species diversity in community succession. The relationship between soil factors and species diversity were also analyzed by using DCCA (detrended canonical correspondence analysis). The results showed that 1) the successional sequence of plant communities in this region was community Carex melanostachya→community Poa sibirica→community Potentilla fruticosa→community Betula humilis→community Picea obovata; 2) Along wtih the succession progressed, the species dominance increased significantly, while species diversity increased first and then showed a falling trend, with a peak at phase of community Potentilla fruticosa; 3) there is significant negative correlation between water content of soil and species dominance.
引文
[1]潘晓玲,张宏达.哈纳斯自然保护区植被特点和植物区系形成的探讨[J].干旱区研究,1994,11(4)：1-7
[2]张荟荟,潘存德,巴扎尔别克·阿斯勒汗,等.喀纳斯旅游区森林群落类型及其物种多样性随海拔梯度的变化[J].新疆农业科学,2008,45(2)：225-231
[3]刘翠玲,潘存德,吴晓勇,等.新疆喀纳斯树种丰富度垂直格局特征[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(2)：203-208
[4]潘文斗.中国喀纳斯保护区科学考察[M].北京：中国林业出版社,1989
[5]程平,潘存德,寇福堂,等.新疆喀纳斯旅游区森林群落数量分类与排序[J].新疆农业大学学报,2008,31(6)：1-7
[6]郑伟,朱进忠,潘存德.喀纳斯草地群落和土壤理化特征对放牧干扰的响应[J].草业科学,2008,25(8)：103-109
[7]郑伟,朱进忠,潘存德,等.旅游干扰对喀纳斯景区草地植物多样性的影响[J].草地学报,2008,16(6)：624-635
[8]郑伟,朱进忠,潘存德.旅游干扰对喀纳斯景区草地土壤—植被系统的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2009,31(1)：109-115
[9]任毅.秦岭大熊猫栖息地植物[M].西安：陕西科学技术出版社,1998
[10]宋永昌.中国常绿阔叶林分类试行方案[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(4)：435-448
[11]吴征镒.中国植被[M].北京：科学出版社,1980
[12]张峰,上官铁梁.模糊图论在山西植被区划中的应用[J].植物生态学报与地植物学报,1991,15(1)；94-100
[13]Fang J Y, Yoda K. Distribution of tree species along the thermal gradient [J]. Climate and vegetation in China (Ⅳ). EcoIRes,1990,5:291-302
[14]Fang J Y, Yoda K. Effect of climatic factors on the upper limit of distribution of evergreen broadleaf forest [J]. Climate and vegetation in China (V). Acta Botanica Sinica. EcoIRes,1991,6:113-125
[15]Fang J Y, Ohsawa M., Kira T. Vertical vegetation zones along 30°N latitude in humid East Asia [J]. Vegetation,1996,126:135-149
[16]Fang J Y. Ecoclimatological analysis of the forest zones in China [J]. Acta Ecol Sin,1991,
11：377-387
[17]倪健,陈仲新,董鸣,等.中国生物多样性的生态地理区划[J].植物学报,1998,40(4)：370-382
[18]缪绅裕,戴克元,王厚麟,等.广东英德滑水山植被类型研究[J].广州大学学报(自然科学版),2003,2(1)：20-26
[19]胡天华.宁夏贺兰山自然保护区植被区划及植物区系组成[J].宁夏农林科技,2003,6：10-11
[20]张佃民,刘晓云,刘速.新疆植被区划的新方案[J].干旱区研究,1990,1：1-10
[21]成克武,臧润国,张炜银,等.新疆科克苏湿地自然保护区维管束植物区系[J].干旱区研究,2007,1(14)：8-24
[22]买买提明·苏来曼,赵建成,索菲娅.喀纳斯自然保护区苔藓植物区系[J].干旱区研究,1999,4(16)：19-24
[23]陈文俐,杨昌友.中国阿尔泰山种子植物区系研究[J].云南植物研究,2000,22(4)：371-378
[24]Hill M. O., Gauch H. G. Detrended correspondence analysis:an improved ordination technique [J]. Vegetation,1980,42:47
[25]Hill M. O. TWINSFAN FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of the individuals and attributes [J]. Ecology and Systematic. Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press,1979
[26]Gauch H. C.群落生态学中的多元分析[M].李博等译.北京：科学出版社,1988
[27]潘代远,孔令韶,金启宏.新疆呼图壁盐化草甸群落的DCA、CCA及DCCA分析[J].植物生态学报,1995,19(2)：115-127
[28]张金屯.植被数量分析方法的发展.当代生态学博论[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,1992：249-265
[29]阳含熙,卢泽愚.植物生态学的数量分类方法[M].北京：科学出版社,1981
[30]张金屯.植被数量生态学方法[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,1995
[31]张金屯.模糊数学排序及其应用[J].生态学报,1992,12(4)：325-331
[32]Magurran A. E. Ecological diversity and its measurement [M]. New Jersy:Princeton University Press,1988
[33]Kimminsk J. P.森林生态学[M].文剑平等译.北京：中国林业出版社,1992：
363-370
[34]Odum E. P.生态学基础[M].孙儒泳等译.北京：人民教育出版社,1981：144-148
[35]Whittaker R. H. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and Catalina Mountains, Arizona:a gradient analysis of the South slope [J]. Ecology,1965,46:429-452
[36]Whittaker R. H. Evolution and measurement of species diversity [J]. Taxon,1972,21: 213-251
[37]韩玉萍,李雪梅,刘玉成.缙云山森林群落次生演替序列的垂直结构与物种多样性的关系[J].西南农业大学学报,1999,21(4)：391-397
[38]黄忠良,孔国辉,何道泉.鼎湖山植物群落多样性的研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(2)：193-198
[39]李晋鹏,上官铁梁,郭东罡,等.山西吕梁山南段植物群落物种多样性与环境的关系[J].山地学报,2008,26(5)：612-619
[40]李军玲,张金屯.太行山中段植物群落物种多样性与环境的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2006,12(6)：766-771
[41]郝占庆,于德永,杨晓明,等.长白山北坡植物群落α多样性及其随海拔梯度的变化[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(7)：785-789
[42]Yoda K. A. Preliminary survey of the forest vegetation of eastern Nepal [J]. Coll Arts Sci Chiba Univ Not Sci Ser,1967,5:99-140
[43]Whittaker R. H. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California [J]. Ecological Monographs,1960,30(3):279-338
[44]Peet R. K. Forest vegetation of the Colorado, Front Range, Pattern of species diversity [J]. Vegetation,1978,37:65-78
[45]Wilson J. B., Sydes M. T. Some tests for niche Imitation by examination of species diversity in the Dunedin area, New Zealand [J]. New Zealand journal of botany,1988,26: 237-244
[46]安树青,王峥峰,朱学雷,等.土壤因子对次生森林群落物种多样性的影响[J].武汉植物学研究,1997,15(2)：143-150
[47]Tilman D. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats [J]. Ecology,1994, 75(1):2-16
[48]肖德荣,田昆,张利权.滇西北高原纳帕海湿地植物多样性与土壤肥力的关系[J].
生态学报,2008,28(7)：3116-3124
[49]陈光升,钟章成.重庆缙云山常绿阔叶林群落物种多样性与土壤因子的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2004,10(1)：12-17
[50]李旭光.缙云山森林生态系统物种多样性空间格局分析[J].西南师范大学学报,1996,21(3)：258-265
[51]朱守谦.贵州部分森林群落物种多样性初步研究[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1987,11(4)：286-296
[52]Bormann F. H.森林生态系统的格局与过程[M].李景文等译.北京：科学出版社,1985
[53]Whittaker R.H.群落与生态系统[M].姚壁君等译.北京：科学出版社,1997
[54]Reiners W. A. Plant diversity in a chronosequence at glacier bay, Alaska [J]. Ecol,1971, 52:55-69
[55]王仁忠,李建东.松嫩平原南部主要群落植物多样性的比较研究[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(4)：381-385
[56]刘玉成,钟章成.缙云山自然保护区植被概况[J].西南师范学院学报,1984,9(5)：117-128
[57]张大勇.亚高山草甸弃耕地植物群落演替的数量研究：群落组成分析[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1988,12(4)：283-291
[58]陈仲新,谢海生.毛乌素沙地景观生态类型与灌丛生物多样性初步研究[J]. 生态学报,1994,14(4)：345-354
[59]Auclair A. N. Diversity relations of upland forest in the western great Lake area [J]. A mer. Nat,1972,105(946):499-528
[60]刘秀珍,张峰,张金屯.管涔山撂荒地植物群落演替过程中物种多样性研究[J].武汉植物学研究,2008,26(4)：391-396
[61]郭全邦,刘玉成,李旭光.缙云山森林次生演替序列群落的物种多样性动态[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5)：521-524
[62]吴统贵,吴明,萧江华.杭州湾滩涂湿地植被群落演替与物种多样性动态[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(8)：1284-1289
[63]谢晋阳,陈灵芝.中国暖温带若干灌丛群落多样性问题的研究[J].植物生态学报,1997,21(3)：197-207
[64]严岳鸿,易绮斐,黄忠良,等.广东古兜山自然保护区蕨类植物多样性对植被不同演替阶段的生态响应[J].生物多样性,2004,12(3)：339-347
[65]Grime J. P. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Chichester, John Wieley and Sons, 1979
[66]Pickett S. T. A., White P. S. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics [J]. London:Academic Press,1985
[67]刘志民,赵晓英,刘新民.干扰与植被的关系[J].草业学报,2002,11(4)：1-9
[68]刘志民,陈怀顺,刘新民.干扰与植被关系研究的特点和面临的挑战[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(4)：582-587
[69]杨利民,韩梅,李建东.中国东北样带草地群落放牧干扰植物多样性的变化[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(1)：110-114
[70]孔国辉,莫江明.人为干扰对鼎湖山马尾松种群动态的影响[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2002,10(3)：193-200
[71]秦远好,谢德体,王壮.旅游活动对自然保护区游憩地带植物的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,10(30)：105-112
[72]Wang C Y, Paul M. S. Environmental impacts of tourism on U S National Parks [J]. Journal of Travel Research,1997,35:31-36
[73]Sun D, Walsh D. Review of studies on environmental impacts of recreation and tourism in Australia [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,1998,53:323-338
[74]Lankford V. S. A comment concerning'developing and testing a tourism impact scale'[J]. Journal of Travel Research,2001,39:315-316
[75]Cole D. N., Trull S. J. Quantifying vegetation response to recreational disturbance in the north Cascades [J]. Northwest-Science,1992,66:229-236
[76]朱晓帆,卢红,金燕.峨眉山冷杉衰亡与土壤铝活化的关系研究[J].环境科学,1997,18：25-28
[77]刘鸿雁,张金海.旅游干扰对香山黄栌林的影响研究[J].植物生态学报,1997,21：191-196
[78]LIU R Y. Impacts of outdoor recreation on natural vegetation [J]. Chinese Forestry Science Quarterly,1997,29:35-58 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[79]van Wyk E., Cilliers S. S., Bredenkamp G. J. Vegetation analysis of wetlands in the
Klerksdorp Municipal Area, North-west Province, South Africa [J]. South African Journal of Botany,2000,66:52-62
[80]Jakes P. J. Heritage management in the U. S. forest service:amount hood national forest case study [J]. Society and Natural Resources,2002,15:359-369
[81]Dale D, Weaver T. Trampling effects on vegetation of the trail corridor so fourth Rocjey mountain forest [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1974,11:767-772
[82]Liddle M. J. Theoretical relationship between the primary productivity of vegetation and its ability to tolerate trampling [J]. Biological Conservation,1975,8:251-255
[83]Weaver T., Dale D. Trampling effects of hikers, motorcycles and horses in meadows and forests [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1978,15(2):451-457
[84]Lonsdale W. M., Lane A. M. Tourist vehicles as vectors of weed seeds in Kakadu National Park, Northern Australia [J]. Bio Conserve,1994,69(3):277-283
[85]Caroline K. L., Catherinem. Impacts of tourism on threatened plant taxa and communities in Australia [J]. Ecol Manage Restor,2003,4(1):37-45
[86]Wendy H., Catherine M. P. Vegetation associated with different walking track types in the Kosciuszko alpine area, Australia [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2006,78: 24-34
[87]马驹如.生物多样性保护与自然保护区[J].中国人口,1994,4(2)：57-59
[88]陈昭明,苏鸿杰,胡弘道.风景区游客容纳量之调查与研究[R].台北：台湾大学森林研究所,1989
[89]Ingelog T., Olsson M. T., Bodvarsson H. Effects of long-term trampling and vehicle driving on soil, vegetation and some soil animals in an old scots pine stand in Central Sweden [R]. Vienna:Rapporteroch Uppsatser,1977
[90]石强,钟林生,汪晓菲.旅游活动对张家界国家森林公园植物的影响[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(1)：107-113
[91]牛莉芹,上官铁梁,程占红.中条山中段植物群落优势种群的种间关系研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(12)：2465-2471
[92]张桂萍,张峰,茹文明,等.旅游干扰对历山亚高山草甸植物多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(1)：407-415
[93]刘鸿雁,崔海亭,张金海,等.旅游开发对东灵山亚高山草甸的影响[J].生态学杂志,
1998,17(3)：63-66
[94]程占红,张金屯,上官铁梁.芦芽山自然保护区旅游开发与植被环境关系—旅游影响系数及指标分析[J].生态学报,2003,23(4)：703-711
[95]程占红,张金屯,上官铁梁,等.芦芽山自然保护区旅游开发与植被环境的关系(Ⅰ)：植被环境质量分析[J].生态学报,2002,22(10)：1765-1773
[96]吴甘霖,黄敏毅,段仁燕,等.不同强度旅游干扰对黄山松群落物种多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2006,26(12)：3924-3930
[97]管东生,丁健,王林.旅游和环境污染对广州城市公园森林植物和土壤的影响[J].中国环境科学,2000,20(3)：277-280
[98]Sonja, Christian R, Markus F. Effects of skipiste preparation on alpine vegetation [J]. Appl.Ecol.,2005,42(2):306-317
[99]武俊智,上官铁梁,张婕,等.旅游干扰对马仑亚高山草甸植物物种多样性的影响[J].山地学报,2007,25(5)：534-540
[100]朱珠,包维楷,庞学勇,等.旅游干扰对九寨沟冷杉林下植物种类组成及多样性的影响[J].生物多样性,2006,14(4)：284-291
[101]高贤明,马克明,陈灵芝,等.旅游对北京东灵山亚高山草甸物种多样性影响的初步研究[J].生物多样性,2002,10(2)：189-195
[102]管东生,林卫强,陈玉娟.旅游干扰对白云山土壤和植被的影响[J].环境科学,1999,6(20)：6-9
[103]David S., Bayfield N., Gernusea G A. Use of a weighing lysimeter system to assess the effects of trampling on evapotranspiration of montane plant communities [J]. Can.J.Bot,2002,80(6):675-684
[104]温庆忠.人为干扰对珠江源自然保护区森林植被的影响林业调查规划[J].2002,1(27)：43-48
[105]安树青,王峥峰,朱学雷,等.土壤因子对次生森林群落物种多样性的影响[J].武汉植物学研究,1997,15(2)：143-150
[106]杨兆萍,张小雷.自然保护区生态旅游与可持续发展[J].地理科学,2000,20(5)：450-455
[107]袁国映,张明,张莉,等.喀纳斯自然保护区生态旅游开发与环境保护[J].新疆环境保护,2001,23(3)：17-20
[108]杨兆平,焦黎.哈纳斯自然保护区生态旅游研究[J].干旱区地理,1999,22(3)：43-49
[109]严国安,马剑敏,邱东茹,等.武汉东湖水生植物群落演替的研究[J].植物生态学报,1997,21(4)：319-327
[110]李英年,赵新全,赵亮,等.祁连山海北高寒湿地气候变化及植被演替分析[J].冰川冻土,2003,25(3)：243-249
[111]倪志英,毛子军,孙龙,等.黑龙江省东部山地湿地主要植被类型及其演替规律的研究[J].植物研究,2003,23(3)：356-362
[112]葛继稳,蔡庆华,李建军,等.梁子湖水生植被1955-2001年间的演替[J].北京林业大学学报,2004,26(1)：14-20
[113]Czerepko. A long-term study of successional dynamics in the forest wetlands [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2008,255:630-642
[114]尹光彩,周国逸,唐旭利,等.鼎湖山不同演替阶段的森林土壤水分动态[J].吉首大学学报(自然科学版),2003,3(24)：62-68
[115]马小伟,胡东,华振铃,等.土壤水分、盐分对野鸭湖湿地植物群落演替的影响[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,1(29)：50-54
[116]姚成,万树文,孙东林,等.盐城自然保护区海滨湿地植被演替的生态机制[J].生态学报,2009,29(5)：2204-2210
[117]Hynes H. B. N. The stream and its valley [J]. Verhandlungen der Internationale vereinigung fur theeoretische und angewabdte Limnologie,1975,19:1-15
[118]Decamps H. Towards a landscapes ecology of river valley [J]. New York:Plenum Press,1984:163-178
[119]Naiman R. J., Decamps H. The ecology of interfaces-riparian zones [J]. Annual Review of Ecological Systematic,1997,28:621-658
[120]Finlayson C. M., Bailey B. J., Freeland W. J., et al. Wetlands of the northern territory [M]. Sydney:Surrey Beatty and Sons,1988:103-116
[121]Finlayson C. M., Wilson B., Cowie I. D., Management of Freshwater monsoonal wetland:conservation threats and issues [M]. Canberra:ANPWS,1991:109-117
[122]Whitehead P. J., Chatto R. Northern territory:a directory of important wetlands in Australia, Canberra, Australia [M]. Australia Nature Conservation Agency,1996:119-175
[123]Anderson E., Nilsson C. Effects of river fragmentation on plant dispersal and riparian flora [J]. River Research and Applications,2000,16(1):83-89
[124]Espirito-Santo D., Arsenio P., Bingre P., et al. Conservation and restoration of riparian vegetation in south Portugal [J]. Aspects of Applied Biology,2000,58:241-248
[125]Aguiar F. C., Ferreia M. T., Moreira I. Exotic and native vegetation establishment following channelization of a western Iberian river [J]. River Research and Applications, 2001,17(4-5):509-526
[126]Bufkova I., Prach K. Linking vegetation pattern to hydrology and hydrochemistry in a montane river floodplain, the Sumava National Park, Central Europe [J]. Wetlands Ecology and Management,2006,14(4):317-327
[127]Fullerton A. H., Beechie T. J., Baker S. E., et al. Regional patterns of riparian characteristics in the interior Columbia River Basin, northwestern USA:applications for restoration planning [J]. Landscape Ecology,2006,21(8):1347-1360
[128]Friedman J. M., Auble G T. Transverse and longitudinal variation in woody riparian vegetation along a montane river [J]. Western North American Naturalist,2006, 66(1):78-91
[129]Ferreira M. T., Aguiar F. C. Riparian and aquatic vegetation in Mediterranean-type streams (western Iberia) [J]. Limnetica,2006,25(1-2):411-424
[130]毛志中,杨铁.哈纳斯自然保护区综合考察论文集[M].科学出版社,1988：12-15
[131]王可安,李喜保.哈纳斯自然保护区综合考察论文集[M].科学出版社,1988：20-27
[132]张明,黄金玲.哈纳斯自然保护区综合考察论文集[M].科学出版社,1988：28-36
[133]郝占庆,于德永,杨晓明,等.长白山北坡植物群落α多样性及其随海拔梯度的变化[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(7)：785-789
[134]郭正刚,刘慧霞,孙学刚,等.白龙江上游地区森林植物群落物种多样性的研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(3)：388-395
[135]程瑞梅,肖文发,李建文,等.三峡库区森林植物多样性分析[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(1)：35-40
[136]马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法.见：钱迎倩,马克平主编,生物多样性研究原理与方法[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,1994,141-165
[137]万慧霖,冯宗炜.庐山常绿阔叶林物种组成及其演替趋势[J].生态学报,2008,28(3)：1147-1157
[138]江洪,黄建辉,陈灵芝,等.东灵山植物群落的排序、数量分类与环境解释[J].植物学报,1994,36(7)：539-551
[139]上官铁梁,贾志力,张金屯,等.汾河太原段河漫滩草地植被的数量分类与排序[J].草业学报,2001,4(10)：31-39
[140]欧光龙,彭明春,和兆荣,等.高黎贡山北段植物群落TWINSPAN数量分类研究[J].云南植物研究,2008,30(6)：679-687
[141]李宗善,唐建维,郑征,等.西双版纳热带山地雨林的植物多样性研究[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(6)：833-843
[142]吴彦,刘庆,陈庆恒,等.亚高山30a人工针叶林物种多样性的定量分析[J].应用与环境生物学报,2001,7(5)：408-415
[143]PielouE. C.数学生态学引论[M],1969.卢泽愚译,北京：科学出版社1978
[144]朱锦懋,姜志林,蒋伟,等.人为干扰对闽北森林群落物种多样性的影响[J].生物多样性,1997,5(4)：263-270
[145]Peng S L, Fang W. Development of species diversity in restoration process of tropical man-made forest ecosystem in China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,1995,15(supp A):18-30
[146]许再富,朱华,王应祥,等.澜沧江下游湄公河上游片断热带雨林物种多样性动态.植物生态学报,2004,28(5)：585-593
[147]Forman R. T. T., Sperling D., Bissonette J. A., et al. Road Ecology:Science and Solutions [M]. Washington:Island Press,2003
[148]张金屯,邱扬,柴宝峰,等.吕梁山严村低中山区植物群落演替分析[J].植物资源与环境学报,2000,9(2)：34-39
[149]Zedler J. B. Progress in wetland restoration ecology [J]. Trends Ecol Evol,2000,15: 402-407
[150]Portnoy J. W. Salt marsh diking and restoration:Biogeochemical implications of altered wetlands hydrology [J]. Environmental Management,1999,24:111-120
[151]Garde L. M., Nicol J. M., Conran J. G Changes in vegetation patterns on the margins of a constructed wetland after 10 years [J]. Ecological Management and Restoration, 2004,5:111-116.
[152]Bedford B. L., Walbridge M. R., Aldous A. Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands [J]. Ecology,1999,80,2151-2169
[153]闫芊,陆健健,何文珊.崇明东滩湿地高等植被演替特征[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(5)：1097-1101
[154]Degn H. J. Succession from farmland to heath land:A case for conservation of nature and historic farming methods [J]. Biological Conservation,2001,97:319-330
[155]Otto R., Krusi B. O., Burga C. A, et al. Old-field succession along a precipitation gradient in the semi-arid coastal region of Tenerife [J]. Journal of A rid Environments, 2006,65:156-178
[156]Pollock M. M., Naiman R. J., Hanley T. A. Plant species richness in riparian wetlands: a test of biodiversity theory [J]. Ecology,1998,79:94-105
[157]Ter braak C. J. F. Canonical correspondence analysis:a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis [J]. Ecology,1986,67:1167-1179
[158]卢纹岱.SPSS for Windows统计分析[M].北京：电子工业出版社,2000
[2]张荟荟,潘存德,巴扎尔别克·阿斯勒汗,等.喀纳斯旅游区森林群落类型及其物种多样性随海拔梯度的变化[J].新疆农业科学,2008,45(2)：225-231
[3]刘翠玲,潘存德,吴晓勇,等.新疆喀纳斯树种丰富度垂直格局特征[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(2)：203-208
[4]潘文斗.中国喀纳斯保护区科学考察[M].北京：中国林业出版社,1989
[5]程平,潘存德,寇福堂,等.新疆喀纳斯旅游区森林群落数量分类与排序[J].新疆农业大学学报,2008,31(6)：1-7
[6]郑伟,朱进忠,潘存德.喀纳斯草地群落和土壤理化特征对放牧干扰的响应[J].草业科学,2008,25(8)：103-109
[7]郑伟,朱进忠,潘存德,等.旅游干扰对喀纳斯景区草地植物多样性的影响[J].草地学报,2008,16(6)：624-635
[8]郑伟,朱进忠,潘存德.旅游干扰对喀纳斯景区草地土壤—植被系统的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2009,31(1)：109-115
[9]任毅.秦岭大熊猫栖息地植物[M].西安：陕西科学技术出版社,1998
[10]宋永昌.中国常绿阔叶林分类试行方案[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(4)：435-448
[11]吴征镒.中国植被[M].北京：科学出版社,1980
[12]张峰,上官铁梁.模糊图论在山西植被区划中的应用[J].植物生态学报与地植物学报,1991,15(1)；94-100
[13]Fang J Y, Yoda K. Distribution of tree species along the thermal gradient [J]. Climate and vegetation in China (Ⅳ). EcoIRes,1990,5:291-302
[14]Fang J Y, Yoda K. Effect of climatic factors on the upper limit of distribution of evergreen broadleaf forest [J]. Climate and vegetation in China (V). Acta Botanica Sinica. EcoIRes,1991,6:113-125
[15]Fang J Y, Ohsawa M., Kira T. Vertical vegetation zones along 30°N latitude in humid East Asia [J]. Vegetation,1996,126:135-149
[16]Fang J Y. Ecoclimatological analysis of the forest zones in China [J]. Acta Ecol Sin,1991,
11：377-387
[17]倪健,陈仲新,董鸣,等.中国生物多样性的生态地理区划[J].植物学报,1998,40(4)：370-382
[18]缪绅裕,戴克元,王厚麟,等.广东英德滑水山植被类型研究[J].广州大学学报(自然科学版),2003,2(1)：20-26
[19]胡天华.宁夏贺兰山自然保护区植被区划及植物区系组成[J].宁夏农林科技,2003,6：10-11
[20]张佃民,刘晓云,刘速.新疆植被区划的新方案[J].干旱区研究,1990,1：1-10
[21]成克武,臧润国,张炜银,等.新疆科克苏湿地自然保护区维管束植物区系[J].干旱区研究,2007,1(14)：8-24
[22]买买提明·苏来曼,赵建成,索菲娅.喀纳斯自然保护区苔藓植物区系[J].干旱区研究,1999,4(16)：19-24
[23]陈文俐,杨昌友.中国阿尔泰山种子植物区系研究[J].云南植物研究,2000,22(4)：371-378
[24]Hill M. O., Gauch H. G. Detrended correspondence analysis:an improved ordination technique [J]. Vegetation,1980,42:47
[25]Hill M. O. TWINSFAN FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of the individuals and attributes [J]. Ecology and Systematic. Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press,1979
[26]Gauch H. C.群落生态学中的多元分析[M].李博等译.北京：科学出版社,1988
[27]潘代远,孔令韶,金启宏.新疆呼图壁盐化草甸群落的DCA、CCA及DCCA分析[J].植物生态学报,1995,19(2)：115-127
[28]张金屯.植被数量分析方法的发展.当代生态学博论[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,1992：249-265
[29]阳含熙,卢泽愚.植物生态学的数量分类方法[M].北京：科学出版社,1981
[30]张金屯.植被数量生态学方法[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,1995
[31]张金屯.模糊数学排序及其应用[J].生态学报,1992,12(4)：325-331
[32]Magurran A. E. Ecological diversity and its measurement [M]. New Jersy:Princeton University Press,1988
[33]Kimminsk J. P.森林生态学[M].文剑平等译.北京：中国林业出版社,1992：
363-370
[34]Odum E. P.生态学基础[M].孙儒泳等译.北京：人民教育出版社,1981：144-148
[35]Whittaker R. H. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and Catalina Mountains, Arizona:a gradient analysis of the South slope [J]. Ecology,1965,46:429-452
[36]Whittaker R. H. Evolution and measurement of species diversity [J]. Taxon,1972,21: 213-251
[37]韩玉萍,李雪梅,刘玉成.缙云山森林群落次生演替序列的垂直结构与物种多样性的关系[J].西南农业大学学报,1999,21(4)：391-397
[38]黄忠良,孔国辉,何道泉.鼎湖山植物群落多样性的研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(2)：193-198
[39]李晋鹏,上官铁梁,郭东罡,等.山西吕梁山南段植物群落物种多样性与环境的关系[J].山地学报,2008,26(5)：612-619
[40]李军玲,张金屯.太行山中段植物群落物种多样性与环境的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2006,12(6)：766-771
[41]郝占庆,于德永,杨晓明,等.长白山北坡植物群落α多样性及其随海拔梯度的变化[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(7)：785-789
[42]Yoda K. A. Preliminary survey of the forest vegetation of eastern Nepal [J]. Coll Arts Sci Chiba Univ Not Sci Ser,1967,5:99-140
[43]Whittaker R. H. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California [J]. Ecological Monographs,1960,30(3):279-338
[44]Peet R. K. Forest vegetation of the Colorado, Front Range, Pattern of species diversity [J]. Vegetation,1978,37:65-78
[45]Wilson J. B., Sydes M. T. Some tests for niche Imitation by examination of species diversity in the Dunedin area, New Zealand [J]. New Zealand journal of botany,1988,26: 237-244
[46]安树青,王峥峰,朱学雷,等.土壤因子对次生森林群落物种多样性的影响[J].武汉植物学研究,1997,15(2)：143-150
[47]Tilman D. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats [J]. Ecology,1994, 75(1):2-16
[48]肖德荣,田昆,张利权.滇西北高原纳帕海湿地植物多样性与土壤肥力的关系[J].
生态学报,2008,28(7)：3116-3124
[49]陈光升,钟章成.重庆缙云山常绿阔叶林群落物种多样性与土壤因子的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2004,10(1)：12-17
[50]李旭光.缙云山森林生态系统物种多样性空间格局分析[J].西南师范大学学报,1996,21(3)：258-265
[51]朱守谦.贵州部分森林群落物种多样性初步研究[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1987,11(4)：286-296
[52]Bormann F. H.森林生态系统的格局与过程[M].李景文等译.北京：科学出版社,1985
[53]Whittaker R.H.群落与生态系统[M].姚壁君等译.北京：科学出版社,1997
[54]Reiners W. A. Plant diversity in a chronosequence at glacier bay, Alaska [J]. Ecol,1971, 52:55-69
[55]王仁忠,李建东.松嫩平原南部主要群落植物多样性的比较研究[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(4)：381-385
[56]刘玉成,钟章成.缙云山自然保护区植被概况[J].西南师范学院学报,1984,9(5)：117-128
[57]张大勇.亚高山草甸弃耕地植物群落演替的数量研究：群落组成分析[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1988,12(4)：283-291
[58]陈仲新,谢海生.毛乌素沙地景观生态类型与灌丛生物多样性初步研究[J]. 生态学报,1994,14(4)：345-354
[59]Auclair A. N. Diversity relations of upland forest in the western great Lake area [J]. A mer. Nat,1972,105(946):499-528
[60]刘秀珍,张峰,张金屯.管涔山撂荒地植物群落演替过程中物种多样性研究[J].武汉植物学研究,2008,26(4)：391-396
[61]郭全邦,刘玉成,李旭光.缙云山森林次生演替序列群落的物种多样性动态[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5)：521-524
[62]吴统贵,吴明,萧江华.杭州湾滩涂湿地植被群落演替与物种多样性动态[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(8)：1284-1289
[63]谢晋阳,陈灵芝.中国暖温带若干灌丛群落多样性问题的研究[J].植物生态学报,1997,21(3)：197-207
[64]严岳鸿,易绮斐,黄忠良,等.广东古兜山自然保护区蕨类植物多样性对植被不同演替阶段的生态响应[J].生物多样性,2004,12(3)：339-347
[65]Grime J. P. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Chichester, John Wieley and Sons, 1979
[66]Pickett S. T. A., White P. S. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics [J]. London:Academic Press,1985
[67]刘志民,赵晓英,刘新民.干扰与植被的关系[J].草业学报,2002,11(4)：1-9
[68]刘志民,陈怀顺,刘新民.干扰与植被关系研究的特点和面临的挑战[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(4)：582-587
[69]杨利民,韩梅,李建东.中国东北样带草地群落放牧干扰植物多样性的变化[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(1)：110-114
[70]孔国辉,莫江明.人为干扰对鼎湖山马尾松种群动态的影响[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2002,10(3)：193-200
[71]秦远好,谢德体,王壮.旅游活动对自然保护区游憩地带植物的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,10(30)：105-112
[72]Wang C Y, Paul M. S. Environmental impacts of tourism on U S National Parks [J]. Journal of Travel Research,1997,35:31-36
[73]Sun D, Walsh D. Review of studies on environmental impacts of recreation and tourism in Australia [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,1998,53:323-338
[74]Lankford V. S. A comment concerning'developing and testing a tourism impact scale'[J]. Journal of Travel Research,2001,39:315-316
[75]Cole D. N., Trull S. J. Quantifying vegetation response to recreational disturbance in the north Cascades [J]. Northwest-Science,1992,66:229-236
[76]朱晓帆,卢红,金燕.峨眉山冷杉衰亡与土壤铝活化的关系研究[J].环境科学,1997,18：25-28
[77]刘鸿雁,张金海.旅游干扰对香山黄栌林的影响研究[J].植物生态学报,1997,21：191-196
[78]LIU R Y. Impacts of outdoor recreation on natural vegetation [J]. Chinese Forestry Science Quarterly,1997,29:35-58 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[79]van Wyk E., Cilliers S. S., Bredenkamp G. J. Vegetation analysis of wetlands in the
Klerksdorp Municipal Area, North-west Province, South Africa [J]. South African Journal of Botany,2000,66:52-62
[80]Jakes P. J. Heritage management in the U. S. forest service:amount hood national forest case study [J]. Society and Natural Resources,2002,15:359-369
[81]Dale D, Weaver T. Trampling effects on vegetation of the trail corridor so fourth Rocjey mountain forest [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1974,11:767-772
[82]Liddle M. J. Theoretical relationship between the primary productivity of vegetation and its ability to tolerate trampling [J]. Biological Conservation,1975,8:251-255
[83]Weaver T., Dale D. Trampling effects of hikers, motorcycles and horses in meadows and forests [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1978,15(2):451-457
[84]Lonsdale W. M., Lane A. M. Tourist vehicles as vectors of weed seeds in Kakadu National Park, Northern Australia [J]. Bio Conserve,1994,69(3):277-283
[85]Caroline K. L., Catherinem. Impacts of tourism on threatened plant taxa and communities in Australia [J]. Ecol Manage Restor,2003,4(1):37-45
[86]Wendy H., Catherine M. P. Vegetation associated with different walking track types in the Kosciuszko alpine area, Australia [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2006,78: 24-34
[87]马驹如.生物多样性保护与自然保护区[J].中国人口,1994,4(2)：57-59
[88]陈昭明,苏鸿杰,胡弘道.风景区游客容纳量之调查与研究[R].台北：台湾大学森林研究所,1989
[89]Ingelog T., Olsson M. T., Bodvarsson H. Effects of long-term trampling and vehicle driving on soil, vegetation and some soil animals in an old scots pine stand in Central Sweden [R]. Vienna:Rapporteroch Uppsatser,1977
[90]石强,钟林生,汪晓菲.旅游活动对张家界国家森林公园植物的影响[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(1)：107-113
[91]牛莉芹,上官铁梁,程占红.中条山中段植物群落优势种群的种间关系研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(12)：2465-2471
[92]张桂萍,张峰,茹文明,等.旅游干扰对历山亚高山草甸植物多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(1)：407-415
[93]刘鸿雁,崔海亭,张金海,等.旅游开发对东灵山亚高山草甸的影响[J].生态学杂志,
1998,17(3)：63-66
[94]程占红,张金屯,上官铁梁.芦芽山自然保护区旅游开发与植被环境关系—旅游影响系数及指标分析[J].生态学报,2003,23(4)：703-711
[95]程占红,张金屯,上官铁梁,等.芦芽山自然保护区旅游开发与植被环境的关系(Ⅰ)：植被环境质量分析[J].生态学报,2002,22(10)：1765-1773
[96]吴甘霖,黄敏毅,段仁燕,等.不同强度旅游干扰对黄山松群落物种多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2006,26(12)：3924-3930
[97]管东生,丁健,王林.旅游和环境污染对广州城市公园森林植物和土壤的影响[J].中国环境科学,2000,20(3)：277-280
[98]Sonja, Christian R, Markus F. Effects of skipiste preparation on alpine vegetation [J]. Appl.Ecol.,2005,42(2):306-317
[99]武俊智,上官铁梁,张婕,等.旅游干扰对马仑亚高山草甸植物物种多样性的影响[J].山地学报,2007,25(5)：534-540
[100]朱珠,包维楷,庞学勇,等.旅游干扰对九寨沟冷杉林下植物种类组成及多样性的影响[J].生物多样性,2006,14(4)：284-291
[101]高贤明,马克明,陈灵芝,等.旅游对北京东灵山亚高山草甸物种多样性影响的初步研究[J].生物多样性,2002,10(2)：189-195
[102]管东生,林卫强,陈玉娟.旅游干扰对白云山土壤和植被的影响[J].环境科学,1999,6(20)：6-9
[103]David S., Bayfield N., Gernusea G A. Use of a weighing lysimeter system to assess the effects of trampling on evapotranspiration of montane plant communities [J]. Can.J.Bot,2002,80(6):675-684
[104]温庆忠.人为干扰对珠江源自然保护区森林植被的影响林业调查规划[J].2002,1(27)：43-48
[105]安树青,王峥峰,朱学雷,等.土壤因子对次生森林群落物种多样性的影响[J].武汉植物学研究,1997,15(2)：143-150
[106]杨兆萍,张小雷.自然保护区生态旅游与可持续发展[J].地理科学,2000,20(5)：450-455
[107]袁国映,张明,张莉,等.喀纳斯自然保护区生态旅游开发与环境保护[J].新疆环境保护,2001,23(3)：17-20
[108]杨兆平,焦黎.哈纳斯自然保护区生态旅游研究[J].干旱区地理,1999,22(3)：43-49
[109]严国安,马剑敏,邱东茹,等.武汉东湖水生植物群落演替的研究[J].植物生态学报,1997,21(4)：319-327
[110]李英年,赵新全,赵亮,等.祁连山海北高寒湿地气候变化及植被演替分析[J].冰川冻土,2003,25(3)：243-249
[111]倪志英,毛子军,孙龙,等.黑龙江省东部山地湿地主要植被类型及其演替规律的研究[J].植物研究,2003,23(3)：356-362
[112]葛继稳,蔡庆华,李建军,等.梁子湖水生植被1955-2001年间的演替[J].北京林业大学学报,2004,26(1)：14-20
[113]Czerepko. A long-term study of successional dynamics in the forest wetlands [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2008,255:630-642
[114]尹光彩,周国逸,唐旭利,等.鼎湖山不同演替阶段的森林土壤水分动态[J].吉首大学学报(自然科学版),2003,3(24)：62-68
[115]马小伟,胡东,华振铃,等.土壤水分、盐分对野鸭湖湿地植物群落演替的影响[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,1(29)：50-54
[116]姚成,万树文,孙东林,等.盐城自然保护区海滨湿地植被演替的生态机制[J].生态学报,2009,29(5)：2204-2210
[117]Hynes H. B. N. The stream and its valley [J]. Verhandlungen der Internationale vereinigung fur theeoretische und angewabdte Limnologie,1975,19:1-15
[118]Decamps H. Towards a landscapes ecology of river valley [J]. New York:Plenum Press,1984:163-178
[119]Naiman R. J., Decamps H. The ecology of interfaces-riparian zones [J]. Annual Review of Ecological Systematic,1997,28:621-658
[120]Finlayson C. M., Bailey B. J., Freeland W. J., et al. Wetlands of the northern territory [M]. Sydney:Surrey Beatty and Sons,1988:103-116
[121]Finlayson C. M., Wilson B., Cowie I. D., Management of Freshwater monsoonal wetland:conservation threats and issues [M]. Canberra:ANPWS,1991:109-117
[122]Whitehead P. J., Chatto R. Northern territory:a directory of important wetlands in Australia, Canberra, Australia [M]. Australia Nature Conservation Agency,1996:119-175
[123]Anderson E., Nilsson C. Effects of river fragmentation on plant dispersal and riparian flora [J]. River Research and Applications,2000,16(1):83-89
[124]Espirito-Santo D., Arsenio P., Bingre P., et al. Conservation and restoration of riparian vegetation in south Portugal [J]. Aspects of Applied Biology,2000,58:241-248
[125]Aguiar F. C., Ferreia M. T., Moreira I. Exotic and native vegetation establishment following channelization of a western Iberian river [J]. River Research and Applications, 2001,17(4-5):509-526
[126]Bufkova I., Prach K. Linking vegetation pattern to hydrology and hydrochemistry in a montane river floodplain, the Sumava National Park, Central Europe [J]. Wetlands Ecology and Management,2006,14(4):317-327
[127]Fullerton A. H., Beechie T. J., Baker S. E., et al. Regional patterns of riparian characteristics in the interior Columbia River Basin, northwestern USA:applications for restoration planning [J]. Landscape Ecology,2006,21(8):1347-1360
[128]Friedman J. M., Auble G T. Transverse and longitudinal variation in woody riparian vegetation along a montane river [J]. Western North American Naturalist,2006, 66(1):78-91
[129]Ferreira M. T., Aguiar F. C. Riparian and aquatic vegetation in Mediterranean-type streams (western Iberia) [J]. Limnetica,2006,25(1-2):411-424
[130]毛志中,杨铁.哈纳斯自然保护区综合考察论文集[M].科学出版社,1988：12-15
[131]王可安,李喜保.哈纳斯自然保护区综合考察论文集[M].科学出版社,1988：20-27
[132]张明,黄金玲.哈纳斯自然保护区综合考察论文集[M].科学出版社,1988：28-36
[133]郝占庆,于德永,杨晓明,等.长白山北坡植物群落α多样性及其随海拔梯度的变化[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(7)：785-789
[134]郭正刚,刘慧霞,孙学刚,等.白龙江上游地区森林植物群落物种多样性的研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(3)：388-395
[135]程瑞梅,肖文发,李建文,等.三峡库区森林植物多样性分析[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(1)：35-40
[136]马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法.见：钱迎倩,马克平主编,生物多样性研究原理与方法[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,1994,141-165
[137]万慧霖,冯宗炜.庐山常绿阔叶林物种组成及其演替趋势[J].生态学报,2008,28(3)：1147-1157
[138]江洪,黄建辉,陈灵芝,等.东灵山植物群落的排序、数量分类与环境解释[J].植物学报,1994,36(7)：539-551
[139]上官铁梁,贾志力,张金屯,等.汾河太原段河漫滩草地植被的数量分类与排序[J].草业学报,2001,4(10)：31-39
[140]欧光龙,彭明春,和兆荣,等.高黎贡山北段植物群落TWINSPAN数量分类研究[J].云南植物研究,2008,30(6)：679-687
[141]李宗善,唐建维,郑征,等.西双版纳热带山地雨林的植物多样性研究[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(6)：833-843
[142]吴彦,刘庆,陈庆恒,等.亚高山30a人工针叶林物种多样性的定量分析[J].应用与环境生物学报,2001,7(5)：408-415
[143]PielouE. C.数学生态学引论[M],1969.卢泽愚译,北京：科学出版社1978
[144]朱锦懋,姜志林,蒋伟,等.人为干扰对闽北森林群落物种多样性的影响[J].生物多样性,1997,5(4)：263-270
[145]Peng S L, Fang W. Development of species diversity in restoration process of tropical man-made forest ecosystem in China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,1995,15(supp A):18-30
[146]许再富,朱华,王应祥,等.澜沧江下游湄公河上游片断热带雨林物种多样性动态.植物生态学报,2004,28(5)：585-593
[147]Forman R. T. T., Sperling D., Bissonette J. A., et al. Road Ecology:Science and Solutions [M]. Washington:Island Press,2003
[148]张金屯,邱扬,柴宝峰,等.吕梁山严村低中山区植物群落演替分析[J].植物资源与环境学报,2000,9(2)：34-39
[149]Zedler J. B. Progress in wetland restoration ecology [J]. Trends Ecol Evol,2000,15: 402-407
[150]Portnoy J. W. Salt marsh diking and restoration:Biogeochemical implications of altered wetlands hydrology [J]. Environmental Management,1999,24:111-120
[151]Garde L. M., Nicol J. M., Conran J. G Changes in vegetation patterns on the margins of a constructed wetland after 10 years [J]. Ecological Management and Restoration, 2004,5:111-116.
[152]Bedford B. L., Walbridge M. R., Aldous A. Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands [J]. Ecology,1999,80,2151-2169
[153]闫芊,陆健健,何文珊.崇明东滩湿地高等植被演替特征[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(5)：1097-1101
[154]Degn H. J. Succession from farmland to heath land:A case for conservation of nature and historic farming methods [J]. Biological Conservation,2001,97:319-330
[155]Otto R., Krusi B. O., Burga C. A, et al. Old-field succession along a precipitation gradient in the semi-arid coastal region of Tenerife [J]. Journal of A rid Environments, 2006,65:156-178
[156]Pollock M. M., Naiman R. J., Hanley T. A. Plant species richness in riparian wetlands: a test of biodiversity theory [J]. Ecology,1998,79:94-105
[157]Ter braak C. J. F. Canonical correspondence analysis:a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis [J]. Ecology,1986,67:1167-1179
[158]卢纹岱.SPSS for Windows统计分析[M].北京：电子工业出版社,2000