混合动力车用汽油机效率模型研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
混合动力车用发动机效率模型能够解决因不确定的油耗特性导致发动机控制准确性难以保证的难题。本文基于经理论推导得出的、用于定量计算低速、稳定、层流流动实际气体流能量的牛顿理想气流能量方程,和对LJ491QE1和4G18-AA汽油机的大量试验研究,提出换气当量损失和换气经验当量损失作为适用于自然吸气、进气道喷射式汽油机的混合动力车用汽油机通用效率模型,确定“动态”变化的高效工作区理论。理论推导得汽油机排气的气体常数、定容比热容、定压比热容、比热比、以及燃烧效率和进气气体常数等计算公式。牛顿理想气流能量方程可定量计算发动机的换气损失和排气带走的能量;换气经验当量损失仅利用进、排气压力两个参数,就能够准确地确定“动态”变化的汽油机高效工作区且较换气当量损失具有更好的响应性。?
That engine always operates in high efficient operating range is one of main energy saving ways of hybrid electric vehicle. However, it is difficult to accurately control the engine used by the hybrid electric vehicle because the fuel consumption characteristic of the engine varies with external surroundings and its own conditions dynamically. Even though at present the method of correction factors is used to confirm the high efficient operating range of the engine which varies dynamically, there is no theoretical basis to support the correction factors to be sharing among different series of the engines. The experimental working of confirming the correction factors is too heavy and correction factors can not correct the dynamic changes of the high efficient operating range due to the conditions change of the engine itself, it also can't be guaranteed to the accuracy of the correction factors obtained through experiments under different external surrounding conditions. The reasons analyzed above lead to the hybrid electric vehicle’s several shortcomings of long development cycle, high research and development cost, can’t guarantee the control accuracy of the engine. So far, there is no relevant report about resolveing the problems above mentioned in the data bases of SAE and CNKI, which makes the relevant research more difficult. That founding general efficiency model of the engine used by hybrid electric vehicle which is based on the engine’s operating state parameters in order to control the engine operating in high efficient operating range by feedback control under the conditions of different engines, different external surroundings, different conditions of the engine itself is significant without doubt to reduce the development cycle, reduce the high research and development cost, and guarantee the control accuracy of the engine.
     Based on LJ491QE1 and 4G18-AA gasoline engines as research objects, for the first time, this paper presented the theory to employ the air exchange equivalent loss which is based on the temperature and pressure of the intake and exhaust and the experience air exchange equivalent loss which is based on the pressure of the intake and exhaust as efficient model of the above mentioned naturally aspirated and port fuel injection gasoline engine used by hybrid electric vehicle to confirm the engine’s high efficient operating range which varies dynamically. Also for the first time, this paper deduced the energy equition for Newtonian ideal airflow which can be used to calculate the energy of the low speed, steady, laminar actual airflow and the engine’s air exchange loss and the energy taken away by the engine’s exhaust can also be quantitative calculated by the energy equition. The formulas for calculating gasoline engine exhaust’s gas constant, specific heat at constant volume, specific heat at constant pressure, ratio of specific heat and combustion efficiency, intake’s gas constant were also obtained through theoretical derivation. The experience effcieny model of gasoline engine used by hybrid electric vehicle (the experience air exchange equivalent loss) can obtain better responsiveness than the effcieny model of gasoline engine used by hybrid electric vehicle (the air exchange equivalent loss) in the gasoline engine’s feedback control and the control module of the gasoline engine can control the engine to operate in high efficient operating range through feedback control only using two parameters which are intake and exhaust pressure with parameter of fuel consumption unknown.
     The major works and conclusions as follows:
     The major energy-saving ways of the hybrid electric vehicles were discussed and the uncertainty of engine’s fuel consumption characteristic was analysed. Series hybrid electric vehicles were taken as example to present the problems in the engines’control of hybrid electric vehicles. The conception of optimal speed characteristic curves and efficiency model of engines used by hybrid electric vehicles were introduced and the solution for resolving the problems in the engines’control of hybrid electric vehicles was confirmed.
     In order to quantize the variation range of load percentage, the engines’operating condition range under the load characteristic was partitioned. The conception of high efficient operating range was introduced in order to quantize the operating range of better engines’economy. That the scope of experimental research was focused on the medium and heavy load operating contions under which better fuel economy can be obtained was determined by means of experimental study on the LJ491QE1 gasoline engine. The practical work process of the naturally aspirated and port fuel injection gasoline engine was analysed based on the indicator diagrams of the LJ491QE1 gasoline engine, the equal compression ratio model of ideal cycle model applicable to gasoline engine and the component of the effective power were made clear based on ideal cycle model of internal combustion engine.
     The LJ491QE1 gasoline engine was taken as object of experimental study, the mechanical loss variation laws of the naturally aspirated and port fuel injection gasoline engine was studied by means of the analysis and the experiments and draw the conclusion that the mechanical loss power under load characteristic can be treated as a constant which is determined by the intrinsic feature of the engine itself. The combustion efficiency formula of gasoline engine was deduced and power balance equation of actual cycle was built.
     The conclusion was made clear that the“system”and“control volume”in Fluid dynamics are corresponding to the“open system”and“closed system”in Thermodynamics. The conclusion was also made clear that without considering the change of kinetic energy and potential energy, the conversion of heat and power between working medium and surroundings cause the change of internal energy in the system and the conversion of heat and power between working medium and surroundings cause the change of enthalpy in the control volume. By means of theoretical derivation, the conclusion was drawn that the fluid layer model and the fluid column model of full developed non-compressible fluid (steady) flow in circular tube have the same essence. The conception of Newtonian ideal airflow was introduced, the energy equition for Newtonian ideal airflow was deduced and the essence of enthalpy was made clear. The formulas for calculating exhaust gas constant Rge, specific heat at constant volume of exhaust c ve0 , specific heat at constant pressure of exhaust , specific heat ratio of exhaust ke and intake gas constant Rgi were deduced by means of theoretical derivation. The conclusion that the density of LJ491QE1 gasoline engine’s exhaust can be approximated as constant and the conclusion that the thermodynamic energy increase of intake because of heating by intake pipe can be ignored were drawn by means of the expertment study on the LJ491QE1 gasoline engine. On the basis of energy equition for Newtonian ideal airflow, the aie exchange loss of the LJ491QE1 gasoline engine was qualitatively studied. The energy taken away by exhaust can also be qualitatively calculated by the energy equition for Newtonian ideal airflow.
     On the basis of experimental study on the LJ491QE1 gasoline engine, the following conclusions were drawn: the crank angle can be regarded as fixed value while the cylinder pressure researches its peak value under the better efficiency operating condition of medium and heavy load, the exhaust flow can be regard as full developed non-compressible fluid (steady) flow in circular tube whose length is a fixed value, the powerloss caused by exhaust is in proportion to the square of the exhaust gage pressure value.
     The conception of air exchange equivalent loss was introduced and by the study means of load characteristic experiments, small interval load characteristic experiments, variable structure load characteristic experiments, the following conclusions were drawn: the air exchange equivalent loss eqr and the break specific fuel consumption ge have the same variation law under load characteristic, the air exchange equivalent loss eqr was the main factor which influence the evolution of the break specific fuel consumption in the high efficient range under load characteristic, and the air exchange equivalent loss can be eqr treated as the efficiency model of the LJ491QE1 gasoline engine under load characteristic.
     The conception of air exchange experience equivalent loss was introduced, by the study means of load characteristic experiments, small interval load characteristic experiments, variable structure small interval load characteristic experiments to the LJ491QE1 gasoline engine and by the study means of load characteristic experiments, variable structure load characteristic experiments to the 4G18-AA gasoline engine, the following conclusions were drawn: the air change experience equivalent loss Eqr and the brake specific fuel consumption ge have the same variation law under load characteristic, the operating condition while the air exchange experience equivalent loss Eqr reached its least value under the load character correspond to the high efficient operating range of the engines. In comparison with the air exchange equivalent loss eqr, better responsiveness in engine feedback control can be reached using the air exchange experience equivalent loss Eqr as the efficiency model of naturally aspirated and port fuel injection gasoline engine, the electrical control unit can control the engines operating under high efficient operating range only using two parameters of intake and exhaust pressure with the parameter of fuel consumption unknown.
引文
[1]凤凰网. www.ifeng.com.
    [2]搜狐网. www.sohu.com.
    [3]国际石油网. www.in-en.com.
    [4]国家环境保护总局. GB18352.1-2001轻型汽车污染物排放限值及测量方法[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2001.
    [5]国家环境保护总局. GB18352.2-2001轻型汽车污染物排放限值及测量方法[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2001.
    [6]国家环境保护总局. GB18352.3-2005轻型汽车污染物排放限值及测量方法[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2005.
    [7] John B. Heywood. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company,1988.
    [8]?国家质量监督检验检疫总局,国家标准化管理委员会. GB19596-2004电动汽车术语[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2004.
    [9]国家质量技术监督局. GB/T 18297-2001汽车发动机性能试验方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2001.
    [10]国家质量技术监督局. GB 18351-2001车用乙醇汽油[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2001.
    [11]柳州五菱汽车有限责任公司柳州机械厂. LJ491QE系列电喷发动机使用说明书.
    [12]哈尔滨东安汽车发动机制作股份有限公司技术开发部. 4G18-A5/4G18-AA/4G18-AC型发动机使用维护说明书.哈尔滨,2006.
    [13]黄海燕主编.汽车发动机试验学教程[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009.1.
    [14]国家质量技术监督局. GB/T 17691-2001车用压燃式发动机排气污染物排放限值及测量方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2001.
    [15]蒋德明主编.内燃机原理(第2版)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1988.
    [16]周龙宝主编.内燃机学(第2版)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2005.
    [17]陈贵堂,王永珍编著.工程热力学(第2版)[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2008.
    [18]华自强,张忠进编.工程热力学(第2版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
    [19]沈维道,童钧耕主编.工程热力学(第4版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
    [20]朱明善等编著.工程热力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1995.
    [21]吴森等译.汽油机管理系统/(德)Bosch公司[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2002.
    [22] P. J. M. Schulten, D. Stapersma. Mean Value Modelling of the Gas Exchange of a 4-stroke Diesel Engine for Use in Powertrain Applications [J]. SAE International: 2003-01-0219.
    [23] G. Fontana, E. Galloni, R. Palmaccio, L. Strazzullo, G. Vittorioso. Development of a New Intake System for a Small Spark-Ignition Engine. Modeling the Flow Through the Inlet Valve [J]. SAE International: 2003-01-0369.
    [24] M. D. Bassett, R. J. Pearson, N. P. Fleming, D. E. Winterbone. A Multi-Pipe Junction Model for One-Dimensional Gas-Dynamic Simulations [J]. SAE International: 2003-01-0370.
    [25] Carlo N. Grimaldi, Michele Battistoni, Lucio Postrioti. Flow Characterization of a High Performance S.I. Engine Intake System -Part 1: Experimental Analysis [J]. SAE International:?2003-01-0623.
    [26] G. Bella, A. De Maio, C. N. Grimaldi. Flow Characterization of a High Performance S.I. Engine Intake System - Part 2: Numerical Analysis [J]. SAE International:?2003-01-0632.
    [27] Duk-Sang Kim, Yeun-Jun Yoo, Yong-Seok Cho, In-Yong Ohm. Numerical Analysis of Flow Characterics for Intake Valve Design [J]. SAE International: 2003-01-2015.
    [28] G. Fontana, E. Galloni, E. Jannelli, R. Palmaccio.?Influence of the Intake System Design on a Small Spark-Ignition Engine Performance A Theoretical Analysis [J]. SAE International: 2003-01-3134.
    [29] A. Nassiri-Toosi, Raei-Tabar, M. Ghamari. Numerical Simulation of Intake Port Flow by Using VECTIS CFD Code [J]. SAE International:?2003-32-0072.
    [30] M. Safari, M. Ghamari, A. Nasiritosi. Intake Manifold Optimization by Using 3-D CFD Analysis [J]. SAE International: 2003-32-0073.
    [31] Christian Fyhr, Olof Dahlberg. Complete Engine Modeling Using CFD [J]. SAE International: 2004-01-0109.
    [32] R. I. Gault, D. J. Thornhill, R. Fleck, D. O. Mackey, G. F. Chatfield. Analysis of the Steady Flow Characteristics through a Poppet Valve [J]. SAE International: 2004-01-1676.
    [33] J. Bohbot, F. A. Lafossas, A. Albrecht, M. Miche, M. Chraibi, P. Menegazzi.? A New Coupling Approach Using a 1D System Simulation Software and a 3D Combustion Code Applied to Transient Engine Operation [J]. SAE International: 2004-01-3002.
    [34] Mirko Knaak, Ulrike Schoop, Karsten Roepke. Comparison of Different Transient Air Charge Models [J]. SAE International:?2005-01-0051.
    [35] Pierre Fontana, Bernhard Huurdeman. A New Evaluation Method for the Thermodynamic Behavior of Air Intake Systems [J]. SAE International:?2005-01-1136.
    [36] David Tweddell, Clayton Sloss, Thomas Werner. An Advanced CFD Simulation Strategy for Exhaust Manifolds with Close-Coupled Catalytic Converters [J]. SAE International:?2005-01-1922.
    [37] Christopher Pye, Vincent de Henau. Combining CFD and 1-D Duct Flow Models for Heat Transfer Simulation [J]. SAE International:?2005-01-2858.
    [38] Bernhard Huurdeman, Harald Banzhaf. CFD Simulation of Flows in Air Cleaners with Transient Dust Loading of the Filter Element [J]. SAE International:?2006-01-1316.
    [39] Qinyin Fan. CFD Simulation of Pressure Drop in Line Pipe [J]. SAE International: 2006-01-1443.
    [40] Cesareo de La Rosa Siqueira, Martin Poulsen Kessler, Rafael Rampazzo, Denilson Alexandre Cardoso. Three dimensional numerical analysis of flow inside exhaust manifolds [J]. SAE International:?2006-01-2623.
    [41] Cesareo de La Rosa Siqueira, Martin Poulsen Kessler, Luiz Augusto Rachid de Araujo, Erlon Castro Rodrigues. Three-dimensional Transient Simulation of an Intake Manifold using CFD Techniques [J]. SAE International:?2006-01-2633.
    [42] Diego A. Arias, Timothy A. Shedd. CFD Analysis of Flow Field and Pressure [J]. SAE International:?2006-32-0113.
    [43] Negin Maftouni, Reza Ebrahimi, Siamac Hossein pour. The effect of Intake Manifold Runners Length on the Volumetric Efficiency by 3-D CFD Model [J]. SAE International:?2006-32-0118.
    [44]贺礼清编.工程流体力学[M].北京:石油工业出版社2004.
    [45]王新月主编.气体动力学基础[M].西安:西北工业大学出版社,2006.
    [46]中国天然气总公司劳资局.油层物性实验工[M].北京:石油工业出版社1997.
    [47] Robert M. Siewert. How Individual Valve Timing Events Affect Exhaust Emissions [J]. SAE International: 710609.
    [48] T. W. Asmus. Valve events and Engine Operation [J]. SAE International: 820749.
    [49] J. A. Gatowski, E. N. Balles, K. M. Chun, F. E. Nelson, J. A. Ekchian, J. B. Heywood. Heat Release Analysis of Engine Pressure Data [J]. SAE International: 841359.
    [50] Wai K. Cheng, Franscois Galliot, Nick Collings. On The Time Delay In-Cylinder Sampling From IC Engines [J]. SAE International: 890579.
    [51] Francois Galliot, Wai K. Cheng, Chun-On Cheng, Mark Sztenderowicz, John B. Heywood, Nick Collings. In-Cylinder Measurements of Residual Gas Concentration in a Spark Ignition Engine [J]. SAE International: 900485.
    [52] Chun-On Cheng, Wai K. Cheng, John B. Heywood, Damlen Maroteaux, Nick Collings. Intake Port Phenomena in a Spark-Ignition Engine at Part Load [J]. SAE International: 912401.?
    [53] Jonathan W. Fox, Wai K. Cheng, John B. Heywood. A Model for Predicting Residual Gas Fraction in Spark-Ignition Engines [J]. SAE International: 931025.
    [54] P. K. Senecal, J. Xin, R. D. Reitz. Predictions of Residual Gas Fraction in IC Engines [J]. SAE International: 962052.
    [55] Hakan Sandquist, Johan Wallesten, Karin Enwald, Stefan Stromberg. Influence of Valve Overlap Strategies on Residual Gas Fraction and Combustion in a Spark-Ignition Engine at Idle [J]. SAE International: 972936.
    [56] Mark Peckham, Tim Hands, James Burrell, Nick Collings, Sergei Schurov. Real Time In-Cylinder and Exhaust NO Measurements in a Production SI Engine [J]. SAE International: 980400.
    [57] P. C. Miles, P. C. Hinze. Characterization of the Mixing of Fresh Charge with Combustion Residuals Using Laser Raman Scattering with Broadband Detection [J]. SAE International:?981428.
    [58] Han-seong Cho, Jong-hwa Lee, Kwi-young Lee. Measurements of HC Concentration near Spark Plug and Its Effects on Combustion [J]. SAE International:?981431.
    [59] A. K?lmel, U. Spicher, R. Düsterwald, F. M. Wytrykus. Analysis of Mixture Conditions Close to Spark Plug Location using a Time Resolved Gas Sampling Valve [J]. SAE International: 982473.
    [60] R. Miller, S. Russ, C. Weaver, E. Kaiser, C. Newman, G. Davis, G. Lavoie. Comparison of Analytically and Experimentally Obtained Residual Fractions and NOX Emissions in Spark-Ignited Engines [J]. SAE International: 982562.
    [61] Richard Ford, Nick Collings. Measurement of Residual Gas Fraction using a Fast Response NO Sensor [J]. SAE International: 1999-01-0208.
    [62] Peter C. Hinze, Paul C. Miles. Quantitative Measurements of Residual and Fresh Charge Mixing in a Modern SI Engine Using Spontaneous Raman Scattering [J]. SAE International: 1999-01-1106.
    [63] Ather. A. Quader, Richard. F. Majkowski. Cycle-By-Cycle Mixture Strength and Residual-Gas Measurements during Cold Starting [J]. SAE International: 1999-01-1107.
    [64] Cory Sutela, Nick Collings. Fast Response CO2 Sensor for Automotive Exhaust Gas Analysis [J]. SAE International: 1999-01-3477.
    [65] Yoshishige Ohyama. Engine Control Using Combustion Model [J]. SAE International: 2000-01-0198.
    [66] Michael Mladek, Christopher H. Onder. A Model for the Estimation of Inducted Air Mass and the Residual Gas Fraction using Cylinder Pressure Measurements [J]. SAE International: 2000-01-0958.
    [67] P. J. Shayler, L. D. Winborn, M. J. Hill, D. Eade. The Influence of Gas/Fuel Ratio on Combustion Stability and Misfire Limits of Spark Ignition Engines [J]. SAE International: 2000-01-1208.
    [68] Yoshishige Ohyama. Engine Control Using Intake, Combustion and Inertia Models [J]. SAE International: 2000-01-2806.
    [69] Changyou Chen, Mark E. A. Bardsley, Richard J. R. Johns. Two-Zone Flamelet Combustion Model [J]. SAE International: 2000-01-2810.
    [70] Cory Sutela, Nick Collings, Tim Hands. Real Time CO2 Measurement to Determine Transient Intake Gas Composition under EGR Conditions [J]. SAE International: 2000-01-2953.
    [71] Hanseong Cho, Kwiyoung Lee, Jonghwa Lee, Jaisuk Yoo, Kyoungdoug Min. Measurements and Modeling of Residual Gas Fraction in SI Engines [J]. SAE International: 2001-01-1910.
    [72] Matthew J. Hall, Patrick Zuzek, Richard W. Anderson. Fiber Optic Sensor for Crank Angle Resolved Measurements of Burned Gas Residual Fraction in the Cylinder of an SI Engine [J]. SAE International:?2001-01-1921.
    [73] Richard Ford, Nick Collings. The Dynamic Effect of Residual Gas Temperature on Combustion Torque at Idle [J]. SAE International: 2001-01-3558.
    [74] Yoshishige Ohyama. Air/Fuel Ratio and Residual Gas Fraction Control Using Physical Models for High Boost Engines with Variable Valve Timing [J]. SAE International: 2002-01-0481.
    [75] P. Giansetti, C. Perrier, P. Higelin, Y. Chamaillard, A. Charlet, S. Couet. A Model for Residual Gas Fraction Prediction in Spark Ignition Engines [J]. SAE International: 2002-01-1735.
    [76] Yoshishige Ohyama. Air/Fuel Ratio and Residual Gas Fraction Control Using Physical Models for Engines with Widely Variable Valve Timing [J]. SAE International:?2002-01-2174.
    [77] Changwei Ji, Paul D. Ronney. Modeling of Engine Cyclic Variation by a Thermodynamic Model [J]. SAE International: 2002-01-2736.
    [78] Marzio Locatelli, Christopher H. Onder, Hans P. Geering. Exhaust-Gas Dynamics Model for Identification Purposes [J]. SAE International: 2003-01-0368.
    [79] Hiroshi Nomura, Toyohiro Hamasaki, Ikue Kawasumi, Yasushige Ujiie, Jun'ichi Sato. Fundamental Study on Effects of Residual Fuel Droplets on Flame Propagation in SI Engines [J]. SAE International: 2003-01-0628.
    [80] F. Schwarz, U. Spicher. Determination of Residual Gas Fraction in IC Engines [J]. SAE International: 2003-01-3148.
    [81] Motomasa Iizuka, Naoya Kato, Kenji Kasashima, Harufumi Muto. Carbon Dioxide Measuring Technology in Engine Combustion Chambers [J]. SAE International: 2004-01-1340.
    [82] Terry Alger, Steven Wooldridge. Measurement and Analysis of the Residual Gas Fraction in an SI Engine with Variable Cam Timing [J]. SAE International: 2004-01-1356.
    [83] Paul J. Shayler, Wing-Cheung Lai, Nicholas Brown, Neville Harbor. Limits on Charge Dilution, Fuel and Air Proportions for Stable Combustion in Spark Ignition Engines [J]. SAE International:?2004-01-1533.
    [84] NicolòCavina, Carlo Siviero, Rosanna Suglia. Residual Gas Fraction Estimation Application to a GDI Engine with Variable Valve Timing and EGR [J]. SAE International: 2004-01-2943.
    [85] Jinyoung Jang, Kitae Yeom, Choongsik Bae. Effects of Exhaust Throttling on Engine Performance and Residual Gas in an SI Engine [J]. SAE International: 2004-01-2974.
    [86] Uwe Koehler, Michael Bargende. A Model for a Fast Prediction of the In-Cylinder Residual Gas Mass [J]. SAE International: 2004-01-3053.
    [87] B. P. Albert, J. B. Ghandhi. Residual Gas Measurements in a Utility Engine [J]. SAE International: 2004-32-0029.
    [88] Elmar Millich, Christian Bohn, Holger Braun, Matthias Schultalbers. A Highly Efficient Simulation-Based Calibration Method Exemplified by the Charge Control [J]. SAE International: 2005-01-0052.
    [89] NicolòCavina, Rosanna Suglia. Spark Advance Control based on a Grey Box Model of the Combustion Process [J]. SAE International: 2005-01-3760.
    [90] P. Giansetti, P. Higelin, Y. Chamaillard, A. Charlet. Residual Gas Fraction Measurement in Spark Ignition Engines [J]. SAE International: 2005-24-078.
    [91] Jing Ping Liu, Henning Kleeberg, Dean Tomazic, Joseph A. Ciaravino, Amer A. Amer. A Model for On-Line Monitoring of In-Cylinder Residual Gas Fraction (RGF) and Mass Flowrate in Gasoline Engines [J]. SAE International: 2006-01-0656.
    [92] M. Grill, T. Billinger, M. Bargende. Quasi-Dimensional Modeling of Spark Ignition [J]. SAE International: 2006-01-1107.
    [93] P. W. Davis, M. S. Peckham. Measurement of Cycle-by-Cycle AFR using a Fast Response NDIR Analyzer for Cold Start Fuelling Calibration Applications [J]. SAE International: 2006-01-1515.
    [94] Amer A. Amer, Lurun Zhong. A Semi-Empirical Model for Fast Residual Gas Fraction Estimation in Gasoline Engines [J]. SAE International: 2006-01-3236.
    [95] Stelios Karagiorgis, Nick Collings, Keith Glover, Neil Coghlan, Anthemios Petridis. Residual Gas Fraction Measurement and Estimation on a Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition Engine Utilizing the Negative Valve Overlap Strategy [J]. SAE International: 2006-01-3276.
    [96] L. de Francqueville, B. Thirouard, V. Ricordeau. Measurement of Residual Gas Fraction Using IR Absorption [J]. SAE International: 2006-01-3337.
    [97] Paul J. Shayler, Lawrence Alger. Experimental Investigations of Intake and Exhaust Valve Timing Effects on Charge Dilution by Residuals, Fuel Consumption and Emissions at Part Load [J]. SAE International: 2007-01-0478.
    [98] Akihiko Kakuho, Kevin R. Sholes, Yutaka Hashizume, Shohei Takatani, Tomonori Urushihara, Ronald K. Hanson, Jay B. Jeffries, Mark G. Allen. Simultaneous Measurement of In-Cylinder Temperature and Residual Gas Concentration in the Vicinity of the Spark Plug by Wavelength Modulation Infrared Absorption [J]. SAE International: 2007-01-0639.
    [99] Pouria Mehrani, Harry C. Watson. Modeling the Effects of Mixture Composition on Cyclic Variability [J]. SAE International:?2007-01-0672.
    [100] Nobuyuki Kawahara, Eiji Tomita, Yutaka Tanaka. Residual Gas Fraction Measurement inside Engine [J]. SAE International:?2007-01-1849.
    [101] P. Giansetti, P. Higelin. Residual Gas Fraction Measurement and Estimation in Spark Ignition Engine [J]. SAE International: 2007-01-1900.
    [102] Mario Eduardo Santos Martins, Hua Zhao. Experimental Results of a 4-Stroke Multi-Cylinder Gasoline Engine with Controlled Auto-Ignition (CAI) Combustion [J]. SAE International:?2007-01-2609.
    [103] G. Colin, P. Giansetti, Y. Chamaillard, P. Higelin. In-Cylinder Mass Estimation using Cylinder Pressure [J]. SAE International:?2007-24-0049.
    [104] Nobuyuki KAWAHARA, Eiji TOMITA, Hidenobu Yasuda. In-situ Residual Gas Concentration Measurement near a Spark Plug in a Motorcycle SI Engine [J]. SAE International:?2007-32-0049.
    [105] Zhihua Li, Hui Xie, Hua Zhao. Studies of the Control of In-cylinder Inhomogeneities in a 4VVAS Gasoline Engine [J]. SAE International:?2008-01-0052.
    [106] James F. Sinnamon, Mark C. Sellnau. A New Technique for Residual Gas Estimation and Modeling in Engines [J]. SAE International:?2008-01-0093.
    [107] Robert G. Prucka, Zoran S. Filipi, Dennis N. Assanis. An Evaluation of Residual Gas Fraction Measurement Techniques in a High Degree of Freedom Spark Ignition Engine [J]. SAE International:?2008-01-0094.
    [108] Seungmok Choi, Minyoung Ki, Kyoungdoug Min, Jinkook Kong, Kyoungjoon Chang, Kiyoung Kwon, Kiwook Shin. An On-Line Model for Predicting Residual Gas Fraction by Measuring IntakeExhaust and Cylinder Pressure in CAI Engine [J]. SAE International:?2008-01-0540.
    [109] T. Leroy, G. Alix, J. Chauvin, A. Duparchy, F. Le Berr. Modeling Fresh Air Charge and Residual Gas Fraction on a Dual Independent Variable Valve Timing SI Engine [J]. SAE International:?2008-01-0983.
    [110] Peter M. Olin. A Mean-Value Model for Estimating Exhaust Manifold Pressure in Production Engine Applications [J]. SAE International: 2008-01-1004.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700