黄淮麦区四个禾谷胞囊线虫群体种类和致病型鉴定及主推品种的抗性评价
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
禾谷胞囊线虫病(Cereal Cyst Nematode,CCN)目前已经在我国小麦产区普遍发生,对小麦生产构成了巨大威胁。种植抗病品种被认为是防治禾谷胞囊线虫病最为经济有效的方法之一,而禾谷胞囊线虫种类及致病型的确定是筛选和培育抗病品种的基础。本文对黄淮麦区四个地区的禾谷胞囊线虫群体的种类及致病型进行了鉴定,并对发病严重的荥阳、许昌两地群体进行了品种抗性研究。主要研究内容和结果如下:
     对荥阳、保定、许昌、安阳两省4地区的禾谷胞囊线虫群体种类进行了生物形态学鉴定,结果表明,许昌群体胞囊阴门锥部位有发达的下桥,与荥阳、安阳和保定群体明显不属于同一种类。依据胞囊和二龄幼虫的形态和主要测量值,将许昌群体鉴定为菲利普胞囊线虫(Heterodera filipjevi),初步将荥阳、许昌、安阳这3个群体鉴定为燕麦胞囊线虫(Heterodera avenae)。
     采用国际标准鉴别寄主对禾谷胞囊线虫荥阳、保定、许昌、安阳4地区群体的致病型进行了鉴定。结果表明:3个燕麦胞囊群体的致病型互不相同,且均不同于目前正式命名的13个致病型。荥阳群体与保定、安阳群体差别较大,其致病谱明显较宽,与澳大利亚的优势致病型Ha13较为接近。13个A组鉴别寄主中,有12个寄主对H. avenae荥阳群体和Ha13致病型的抗性反应一致,所不同的是寄主IskamishK-2-light对H. avenae群体荥阳表现为抗病,而对Ha13致病型则表现为感病;保定群体致病型与彭德良等报道的河北定州群体致病型一致,共同所测的19个鉴别寄主对保定和定州群体的抗性反应完全吻合;H. avenae安阳群体致病型与河北保定群体致病型相似,A组13个鉴别寄主对这两个群体的抗性反应有12个一致,只有Kvl191对安阳群体表现为抗病,而对保定群体则表现感病;H. filipjevi许昌群体致病型与Ireholm报道的瑞典“Gotland strain West”致病型较为相似,共同测试的17个寄主抗性反应中,除Psathias明显对许昌群体表现感病而对“Gotland strain West”表现抗病外,其余16个都较为相似。
     田间病圃和室内接种条件下研究了黄淮麦区主要推广的47个品种对许昌和荥阳两个不同致病群体的抗性。荥阳收获期调查结果显示,47个品种中无免疫品种,太空6号表现为高抗;新麦18、中育6号和新麦11这3个品种达到抗病水平;开麦18等32个品种表现中感或感病;矮抗58、温麦19等11个品种表现高感。对小麦种植前和收获后单位根围土壤内的胞囊量(Pi与Pf)及卵量进行调查,结果表明:太空6号、新麦11、中育6号和新麦18这4个品种Pf与Pi比值小于或等于1,能够抑制小麦禾谷胞囊线虫的增殖,表现为抗病;其余42个品种Pf与Pi比值大于1,能够促进小麦禾谷胞囊线虫的增殖,表现为感病。室内接种鉴定结果表明:供试品种中无免疫和高抗品种,太空6号、新麦11、新麦18和中育6号4个品种表现为抗病;新麦19、周麦20等36个品种表现为中感或者感病;豫麦34、温麦19、泛麦5号、矮抗58等8个品种表现为高感。
     许昌收获期调查结果显示,在供试的品种中无免疫品种,中育6号和太空6号两个品种达到高抗水平;偃展4110、濮麦9号、豫农201和豫农949这4个品种达到抗病水平;矮抗58、新原958、周麦17等31个品种达到中感或感病水平;温麦19等13个品种表现高感。对其Pf和Pi进行调查及对比,结果表明:太空6号、中育6号、濮麦9号和濮优938这4个品种,Pf与Pi比值小于或等于1,能抑制小麦禾谷胞囊线虫增殖,表现抗病;其余品种Pf与Pi比值大于1,促进小麦禾谷胞囊线虫增殖,表现感病。室内盆栽调查结果显示:47个品种既无免疫品种,也无高抗和抗病品种;太空6号、中育6号、濮优938、濮麦9号四个品种达到中感水平;其余表现为感病和高感。
The Cereal Cyst Nematode (CCN) has become an important disease in the wheat production and cause serious economic losses at present in China. This article studied the species and pathotypes of four CCN populations in Huanghui wheat plant area and the resistance of 47 domestic cultivars to Xingyang and Xuchang populations in the greenroom and in the field. The main research contents and results as follows:
     The morphological characteristics of cysts and larvae are observed and measured by 1ight microscope. The results showed that the pououlation in Xuchang has distinct udbridge which was different from the populations in Xingyang、Angyang and Baoding. According to the main morphological measurements of cysts and the second juvenile.The pououlation in xuchang was identified as Heterodera filipjevi, and the other populations were Heterodera avenae.
     The pathotypes of four populations of CCN in Huanghuai wheat plant area were identified by using the International Host Differentials Set (IHDS). The results showed that the three H. avenae poulations were different from each other and also different from the 13 pathotypes that have been described and nominated.The pathotype of Xingyang population is similar to Ha13 which is the dominant pathotype in Australian. The resistance reactions of the population in Xingyang to 13 cutivars of group A of IHDS which has 12 cultivars aggregately is same to the pathotype Ha13. the population in Xingyang and the pathotype Ha13 have 12 similar resistance reactions aggregately to 13 cutivars of group A of IHDS ,except that the IskamishK-2-light is resistant to Xingyang population and susceptible to the Ha13. The pathotype of Baoding is the same as the pathotype of Dingzhou which is reported 1996 by Pengdeliang. There are the same resistance reactions in the 19 common test host.The pathotype of Anyang is similar to the pathotype of Baoding. Only the KVL191 is resistant to Anyang population but susceptible to the Baoding population in group A .there are also two hosts which have different resistance reactions in group B.The pathotype of Xuchang H. filipjevi population is similar to the“Gotland strain West”which is reported in 1985 by Ireholm in Sweden. Except that Psathias was susceptible to Xuchang population and resistant to the“Gotland strain West”obviously in the17 common test host, the other 16 were relatively similar.
     The disease resistance of 47 cultivars (lines) which are planted in Huanghuai area to H.avenae Xingyang population and H. filipjevi Xuchang population were identified and evaluated in the greenroom and in the field respectively. The results indicated that most of 47 domestic cultivars are susceptible or high susceptible. Few of them are resistant cultivars. According to the relative resistance index (RRI), the results of the Xingyang population in the field indicated that there were no immune cultivars in all cultivars. Only Taikong 6 was the high range of resistant cultivars. Xinmai 18 ,Zhongyu 6 and Xinmai 11 were the range of resistant cultivars; the 20 cultivars(Kaimai 18 ,Wenmai 4, Xinmai 19 and so on ) were the range of moderately susceptible cultivars;the 12 cultivars(Zhoumai 17,Xinmai 9-998,Yumai 58 and so on ) were the range of susceptible cultivars; the 11 cultivars (Wenmai 19,Aikang 58,Fanmai 5 and so on ) were the range of high susceptible cultivars. Investigated the initial population (PI) and final population (PF) of wheat rhizosphere, the result showed that Taikong 6 ,Xinmai 11, Zhongyu 6 and Xinmai 18 were range of resitance cultivars which PF/PI were≤1.The others cultivars were range of susceptible cultivars which PF/PI were>1. The result in greenroom is similar to the result in the field. In all tested cultivars, there were no immune and high resistant cultivars. 4 cultivars (Taikong 6, Zhongyu 6, Xinmai 11, Xinmai 18) were the range of resistant cultivars: the 22 cultivars (Xinmai 19,Zhoumai 20, Zhoumai 17, Xinmai 208, Yunong 201, Wenmai 4, Yumai 49 and so on) were the range of moderately susceptible cultivars; the 14 cultivars( Huaimai 16, Puyou 938, Zhengmai 9023,Xinyuan 958 and so on) were the range of susceptible cultivars; the 8 cultivars( Zhoumai 18, Yumai 18, Wenmai 19, Yumai 58 and so on) were the range of high susceptible cultivars.
     The identification result of resistance to H.filipjevi Xuchang population in the field showed that there were also no immune cultivars in all cultivars. Only Taikong 6 and Zhongyu 6 were the range of high resistant cultivars. Yanzhan 4110, Pumai 9, Yunong 202 and Yunong 949 were the range of resistant cultivars. The 31 cultivars (Aikang 58, Xinyuan 958, and Zhoumai 17 and so on) were range of moderately susceptible or susceptible cultivars. The 13 cultivars (Wenmai 19, Lankao 906 and so on) were range of high susceptible cultivars. There was also remarkable difference of PF/PI. The 4 cultivars (Taikong 6, Zhongyu 6, Pumai 9 and Puyou 938) can inhibit the proliferation of cysts because of PF/PI≤1. They were the range of resistance cultivars.The others cultivars were range of susceptible cultivars because of PF/PI>1. The results in greenroom are different from the resuls in the field. There were no immune, high resistant and resistant cultivars. Only 4 culativars (Taikong 6, Zhongyu 6, Pumai 9 and Puyou 938) were the range of moderately susceptible cultivars. The others cultivars were the range of susceptible or high susceptible cultivars.
引文
[1]陈品三,王明祖,彭德良.我国小麦禾谷胞囊线虫(Heterodera avenae Wollenweber)鉴定研究[J].植物病理学报,1992,22(4):339-343.
    [2]彭德良,SubbotinS,MoensM.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫(Heterodera avenae)的核糖体基因(rDNA)限制性片段长度多态性研究[J].植物病理学报,2003,33(4):323-329.
    [3] Handoo,Z.A. A key and compendium to species of the Heterodera avenae group (Nematoda: Heteroderidae).Journal of Nematology,2002,34:250-262
    [4]王明祖,彭德良.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病的研究I.病原鉴定[J].华中农业大学学报,1991,10(4):352-356.
    [5] Rivoal,R.and Cook,R.Nematode pests of cereals.Plants Prasitic Nematode in Temperate Agriculture[M].Wallingford,UK:CAB Internatinal,1993,259-303.
    [6] Nicol,J.M. Important nematode pests.Bread wheat:improvement and production.[M] FAO Plant Production and Protection Series,FAO,Rome,Italy, 2002,345-366.
    [7] Mokabli,A.,Valette,S.,Gauthier,J.P.,Rivoal,R .Variation in virulence of cereal cyst nematode populations from North Africa and Asia.2002,Nematology 4:521-525.
    [8] Miller,L.L.Economic importance of cyst nematode in North America. In: Cyst Nematodes [M].Edited by Lamberti,F.and Taylor,C.E.Plenum Press,New York,1986,3:73-385.
    [9] Shahina,F.and Moqbool,M.A.Distribution of corn cyst and cereal cyst nematodes in Pakistan [Z].International Nematology Network News letter,1990,7:38-40
    [10] Peng,D.L,Zhang,D.S,Chen,P.S,S.H.Qi.Occurrence,distribution and control of Heterodera avenae on wheat in China.[R].Abstracts of Proceeding of the Second International Symposium of the Afro-Asian Society of Nematologists,1994,15: 18-22.
    [11]陈品三,彭德良,文学.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病[J].植物保护,1992,6:37-38.
    [12] At-Hozmi,A.S.,A.M.Ibrahim and Abdul- Razig,A.T.Occurrence,morphology and reproductionof H .avenae on wheat and barley in Saudi Arabia. Pakistan[J].Journal of nematology,1994,12:117-129.
    [13] Farivar,H.and Shakeri,M.A survey of cereal cyst nematode in Iran[J].Pakistan Journal of Nematology,1994,12:73-78.
    [14] Stephan,Z.A. Host status of cyst nematodes in Iran.In:Cyst nematodes [M] .Lamberti F.and Taylor,C.E.eds.Plenum Press,New York,1986,391-392.
    [15] K.P.N.Kleynhans.International Workshopon Cereal Cyst Nematodes [R].2006 ,5:8-12.
    [16] Alexander,H.,McDonald,Julie M.Nicol.Nematode Parasites of Cereals [M].CABIpublishing.
    [17] Jordan,E.M.,Jordan,E.M.,Vandenberg,E., De Waele,D. Plant parasitic nematodes on field crops in South Africa[J].Fundamental and Applied Nematology,1992,15:531-537.
    [18] Romero,M.D.,Andres,M.F.,Lopez Brana,I.,Delibes,A Pathogenic and biochemical comparison of two Spanish populations of the cereal cyst nematode[J] .Nematologia Mediterranea,1996,24,235-244.
    [19] Cotton,J.Cereal root eelworm pathotypes in Engfand and Waies [J]. Plant Pathology ,1967, 16:54-59.
    [20] Rivoal,R.and Sarr,E. Field experiments on Heterodera avenae in France and implications for winter wheat performance [J].Nematologica,1987,33:460-479.
    [21] Irebolm,A.Characterization of pathatypes of cereal cyst nematodes,Heterodera spp In Sweden [J].Nematologica,1994,40:399-411.
    [22] Gotke,N.and Swarup,G.Relationship between initial inoculum levels of Heterodera avenae and penetration of juveniles in the roots of susceptible and resistant barley cultivars[J].Indian Journal of Nematology,1985,14:95-96.
    [23] Brown,R.H.The occurrence of biotypes of the cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae Woll) in Victoria [J].Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal HWbandy,1969,9:453-456
    [24] Brown,R.H.and Meagher,J.W.Resistance in cereals to the cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) in Victoria [J] . Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 1970,10 :360-365.
    [25] O'Brien,P.C.,Fisher,J.M.Reactions of cereals to populations of Heterodera avenae in South Australia [J].Nematologica 1979 25:261-267.
    [26] Smiley,R.,Sheedy,J.,Pinkerton,J.,Easley,S.,Thompson,A.and G.Yan Cereal cyst nematode nematode:distribution,yield reduction,and crop management strategies [J]. Oregon Agr.Expt.Stn.Spec.Rpt.,2007,1074:15-29.
    [27] Holgado,R..M.,Magnusson,C.,Hammeraas,B.The occurrence and hosts of cereal cyst nematodes (Heterodera spp) in Norway [J].International Journal of Nematology, 2003 13(1):1-19.
    [28] Ibrahim,Ahmed A.M.,Al-Hazmi,A. S.,Al-Yahya,F. A.and Alderfasi,A.A.Damage potential and reproduction of Heterodera avenae on wheat and barley under Saudi field condition [J].Nematology,1999,1(6):625–630.
    [29] Maqbool,M.A.Present status of research on plant parasitic nematodes in cereals and foodand forage legumes in Pakistan [M].ICARDA,Aleppo,Syria,1988,173–180
    [30] Handa,D.K.and Yadav,B.D.Comparative losses in hgusked,huskless barley and wheat due to Heterodera avenae in Rajasthan,Indian [J].Current Nematology,1991,2:99-102.
    [31] Rammah,A.Cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) in Morocco[J].Arab and Near East Plant Protection Newsletter,1994,19:40.
    [32] Romero,M.D.,Valdeolivas,A.and Lacaste,C.Incidence of Heterodera avenae on the growth and yield of cereals in Spain[J].Nematologia Mediterranea,1991,19:77-79.
    [33] Brown,R.H.Cultural practices and their effects on Heterodem avenae and grain yields of wheat in Victoria,Australia [J].Bulletin EPPO/OEPP,1982,12:477-484.
    [34] Boer,R.F.de,Kollmorgen,J.F.,Macauley B,J.and Franz ,P.R.Effects of cultivation on rhiaoctonia root rot,cereal cyst nematode,common root and yield of wheat in the Victorian Mallee [J].Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,1991,31:367-372.
    [35] Franklin, M.T. Heterodera latipons n.sp.,a cereal cyst nematode from the Mediterranean region[J].Nematologica,1969, 15:535-542.
    [36] Cohn,E.and R. Ausher. Longidorus cohni and Heterodera latipons, economic nematode pests of oats in Israel [J].Plant Disease Reporter 1973,57:53-54.
    [37] Philis,J.Heterodera latipons and Pratylenchus thornei attacking barley in Cyprus [J]. Nematologia Mediterranea,1997,25:305-309
    [38] Romero, M. D. Heterodera latipons,a record of first occurrence in Spain [J]. Nematolgia Mediterranea,1980,8:95-98.
    [39] Greco,N.,N.Vovlas,A.Troccoli and R.N.Inserra,The mediterranean cereal cyst nematode,Heterodera latipons:A menace to cool season cereals of the United States[J]. Florida Department of Agriculture and Conservation Services Division of Plant Industry, 2002,Nematology Circular 221.
    [40] Momota,Y.,The first report of the nematode Heterodera latipons Franklin,1969 in Japan [J].Japanese Journal of Nematology/Nihon Senchu Kenkyukai Shi,1979,9:73-74.
    [41] Madzhidov,A.R.,Bidera filipjevi n.sp.,(Heteroderina:Tylenchida) in Tadzhikistan [J].Biologisheskie Nauki,1981 83:40-44.
    [42] Rumpenhorst,H.J.,Elekcioglu, I.H.,Sturhan ,D.,Ozturk, G. a n d Enneli, S.1996.The cereal cyst nematode Heterodera filipjevi (Madzhidov) in Turkey [J]. Nematologia Mediterranea,24:135-138.
    [43] Sturhan,D.Occurrence of Heterodera filipjevi (Madzhidov,1981) Stelter,1984 in Iran [J].Pakistan Journal of Nematology,1996,14 (2):89-93.
    [44] Holgado,R.,Anderson,S.,Rowe,J.A.,Magnusson,C. First record of Heteroderafilipjevi (Madzhidov,1981) in Norway.Nematologia mediterranea,2004,32(2):205-211.
    [45] Smiley,R.W.,Yan,G.W., Handoo,Z.A.First record of the cyst nematode Heterodera filipjevi on wheat in Oregon.2008,Plant Disease,92:1136
    [46]刘景泽,马瑞霞,刘文成.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫发生世代的研究[J].河南农业科学, 1995, 4:17-19.
    [47]刘文成,肖敬德.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病发生规律调查[J].河南农业科学,1997,(8):18-19.
    [48]沙广乐,邢彩云,胡锐,等.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病瘿瘤密度对麦苗生长的影响[J].华北农学报,2002,17(2):66-69.
    [49]刘文成,马瑞霞,姚献华,等.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病发生规律的初步研究[J].麦类作物学报,2002,22(3):95-97.
    [50]方中达.安徽省小麦上两个胞囊线虫群体的鉴定[J].江苏农业学报,1996,12 (1):31-35.
    [51]齐淑华,彭德良,张东生,等.禾谷胞囊线虫在我国的新寄主及新分布区初报[J].植物保护,1994,20(4):52.
    [52]彭德良,张东升,齐淑华,等.我国小麦禾谷胞囊线虫(Heterodera avenae)发生分布区域和防治初步研究[A].植物保护研究进展[C],中国科学技术出版社,1999:53-56.
    [53]刘文成,肖敬德.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病发生规律调查[J].河南农业科学,1997,(8):18-19.
    [54]吴绪金.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病产量损失估计及抗病性研究[D].河南农业大学,2007,15-30.
    [55] Small Grains Commodity-Based Survey Reference [M].Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey December 2007,96-110
    [56] Subbotin,S .A.,Waeyenberge ,L.,Irina,A.Identification of Heterodera avenae group species by morphometrics and rDNA -RFLPs [J] .Nematology,1999,1 (2) :195-207
    [57]欧师琪,彭德良.禾谷孢囊线虫(Heterodera avenae)生物学特性及防治方法的研究进展[J].中国线虫学研究,2008(2):281-285.
    [58] Subbotin,S.A.,Sturhan,D.,Rumpenhorst,H.J.,Moens,M.Molecular and orphological characterization of the Heterodera avenae species complex (Tylenchida:Heteroderidae) [J].Nematology.2003,5(4):515-538.
    [59] Al-Yahya,F.A,Alderfasi,A.A.,Al-Hazmi,A.S.,Ibrahim,A.A.,Abdul-Razig, A.T.Effects of cereal cyst nematode on growth and physiological aspects of wheat under field conditions.Pakistan Journal of Nematology[J].1998,16 (1):55-62
    [60]刘维志.植物病原线虫学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000,360-365.
    [61] Banyer,R.J.and Fisher,J.M.Seasonel variation in hatching of eggs of Heterodera avenae[J].Nematologica,1971,17:225-236.
    [62] Meagher,J.W.The effect of environment on survival and hatching of Heterodera avenae [J].EPPO Bulletin,1982,12,361-369.
    [63]郑经武,程胡瑞,方中达.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫(Heterodera avenae Wollenweber)孵化特性研究[J].浙江农业大学学报,1997,23(6):667-671.
    [64]王明祖,颜家坤.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病的研究Ⅱ.病原小麦禾谷胞囊线虫的孵化[J].华中农业大学学报,1993,12(6):561-565.
    [65] Sahin, E.,Nicol,J.,Yorgancilar,A.,Tulek,A.,Kaplan,A.,Faik Yildirim, A.and Bolat,N.The relationship of temperature to the hatching of cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera filipjevi Madzhidov in vitro and under field conditions[J].Australian Nematology Newsletter,2005,16(1):17.
    [66] Sahin,E.,Nicol,J.M.,Yorgancilar,A.,Elekcioglu,I.H.,Tulek,A.,Yildirim, A.F.,and Bolat,N. Seasonal variation of field populations of Heterodera filipjevi, Pratylenchus thornei and P-Neglectus on winter wheat in Turkey[J] . Nematologia Mediterranea,2008,36:31-36.
    [67] Elif, Sahin, Julie M. Nicol,I. Halil,Elekcioglu,Roger Rivoa, Hatching of Heterodera filipjevi in controlled and natur al temperature conditions in Turkey [J].Nematology,2010, 12 (2),193-200.
    [68] Scholz,U.,Sikora,R.A.Hatching behaviour and life cycle of Heterodera latipons Franklin under Syrian agro-ecological conditions [J].Nematology,2004,6(2):245-256.
    [69]王明祖,雷智峰.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫(Heterodera avenae)的主要寄主范围研究[J].湖北植保,1995,6:2-3.
    [70]王明祖,雷智峰.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫寄生范围的研究[J].植物保护,1996,1:3-5.
    [71] Brown,R.H. Ecology and Control of Cereal Cyst Nematode (Heterodera avenae) in Southern Australian[J] .Journal of Nematology ,1984,16(3):216-222.
    [72]王明祖,刘涛玉.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫湖北群体活动期特性[J].植物保护,1998,25(1): 37-40.
    [73] Andersen,S.Resistance of barley to various populations of the cereal root eelworm (Heterodera avenae) [J].Nematologica 1959,4:91-98.
    [74]郑经武.麦类作物对燕麦胞囊线虫抗病性遗传研究进展[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2001, 32 (3):224-227.
    [75] Andersen,S.and Anderson,K.Suggestions for determination and terminology of pathotypes and genes for resistance in cyst-forming nematodes,especially Heterodera avenae[J].EPPO Bull,1982,12:379-386.
    [76] Sanchez A,Zancada,M C.Characterization of Heterodera avenae Pathotypes from Spain [J].Nematologica,1987,33:55 -60
    [77] Rivoal,R.and Cook,R.Nematode pests of cereals. Plants Prasitic Nematode in Temperate Agriculture[M].Wallingford,UK:CAB Internatinal,1993,259-303.
    [78] Cook,R.and Rivoal,R. Genetics of resistance and parasitism.In:Sharma SB (ed) The cyst nematodes[M].Kluwer,Dordrecht,1998,322-352.
    [79]郑经武,程胡瑞,方中达.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫致病型研究[J].植物病理学报,1997,27(4):309-314.
    [80]Saynor,M. The distribution of pathotypes of the cereal cyst eelworm Heterodera avenae in England and Wales.Ann.Appl.Biol,1975,81:215-218.
    [81] Mathur,B.N.,Arya,H.C,etc.The occurrence of biotypes of the cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) in the light soils of Rajasthan and Harya,India[J].Nematology,1974,20:19-26.
    [82]Swarup, G., Sethi, C.L, On the biotypes of Heterodera avenae, the causal organism of“molya”disease of wheat and barley in India [J].India Journal of Nematology,1979,9:164-168.
    [83] Bishnoi,S.P.and Bajaj,H.K,On the species and pathotypes of Heterodera avenae complex of India [J].Indian Journal of Nematology2004,34:147-152.
    [84]Peng D L and Cook,R.Observation on pathotypes of cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae ) in China [J].Afro -Asian Journal of Nematology,1996,4 (2):176-178.
    [85] Hong-xia Yuan,Jun-wei Sun,Wei-xing Yang,Xiao-ping Xing,Zhen-yue Wang,Ian T.Riley,Hong-lian Li.New pathotypes of Heterodera avenae (cereal cyst nematode) from winter wheat in Zhengzhou,Henan,China [J].Australasian Plant Pathology,2010,39(2):107-111.
    [86]彭德良,Subbotin,S.,Moens,M.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫( Heterodera avenae)的核糖体基因(rDNA)限制性片段长度多态性研究[J].植物病理学报,2003,33(4):323-329.
    [87] Zheng.J,Subbotin S A,Waeyenberge L,et al.Molecular characterisation of Chinese Heterodera glycines and H.avenae populations based on RFLPs and sequences of rDNA-ITS regions[J].Russian Journal of Nematology,2000,8 (2):109-113.
    [88]欧师琪,彭德良,李玉.河南郑州小麦禾谷孢囊线虫(Heterodera avenae)的核糖体基因ITS序列和RFLP分析[J].植物病理学报,2008,38 (4):407-413
    [89] Ireholm,A.Resistance in cereals to cereal cyst nematodes [J] . (In Swedish,with English summary) Vaextskyddsrapp.Jordbruk,1985,32:72-80
    [90] Holgado, R.,Andersson,S.,Magnusson,C.Management of cereal cyst nematodes, Heterodera spp.,in Norway [J].Communications in Agricultural and Applied BiologicalSciences,2006,71 (3):639-645
    [91] Dixon,G.M.The effect of cereal cyst eelworm on spring sown cereals[J].Plant Pathology 1969,18:109-112.
    [92] Meagher,J.W.,Brown,R.H.Microplot experiments on the effect of plant hosts on populations of the cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) and on the subsequent yield of wheat [J].Nematologica ,1974,20,337-346.
    [93]杨卫星,袁虹霞,邢小萍,王振跃,李洪连.土壤质地组分及含水量对小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病发生的影响[J].河南科学,2008,6:672-675.
    [94]王振跃,高书峰,李洪连等.不同小麦品种(系)对禾谷胞囊线虫的抗性鉴定[J].河南农业科学,2006(5):50-52.
    [95]王振跃,李洪连,袁虹霞.小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病的发生为害与防治对策[J].河南农业科学,2005(12):54-55.
    [96] Fisher,J.M.and Hancock,T.W.Population dynmics of Heterodera avenae Woll. in South Australia [J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,1991,42:53-68.
    [97] S.Andersson.Population Dynamics and Control of Heterodera avenae A Review with some Original Results [J].EPPO Bull,1982,12(4):463-475.
    [98] Brown,R.H.Studies on the cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae Woll) in Victoria,M.Agr.Sc.thesis,University of Melbourne,1973.
    [99] Meagher J.W.Seasonal fluctuations in numbers of the cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) and of Pratylenchus minyus and Tylenchorhynchus brevidens in soil [J].Nematologica,1970,16:333-347.
    [100]杨卫星,袁虹霞,孙炳剑等.不同施肥种类及施用量对小麦禾谷胞囊线虫病发生的影响[J].植物病理学报,2008,38(6):613-618
    [101] Lazarovits,G.,Tenuta,M.and Conn,K.L.Utilization of high nitrogen and swine manure amendments for control of soil-borne disease:efficacy and mode of action [J]. ActaHorticulturae,2000,532:59-64.
    [102]邓华,李春亮,王国秀.几种常用复合肥对中华卵索线虫寄生后期幼虫生活力的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2003,6:345
    [103] Mojumdar,V.Effects on nematodes.In:Schmutterer,H.(Ed.).The Neem Tree,Azadirachta indica A.Juss.and other melicaceous plants:source of unique natural products for integrated pest management,industry,and other prupose[M].Weinheim,Germany, VCN,1995,129-150.
    [104]J.M.Fisher, A.J.Rathjen,A.J.Dube,Tolerance of Commercial Cultivars and Breeders’Line of Wheat to Heterodera avenae Woll.[J]. Aust.J.Agric.Res,1981,32:545-551.
    [105]阎乃红,陈静,余懋群小麦禾谷孢囊线虫及抗线虫性基因研究进展[J].麦类作物学报2003,23 (1):90-94.
    [106]O’Brien P C,Fisher J M.,Rathjen A J.Intolerance of resistance in two wheat cultivars to an Australian population of Heterodera avenae [J].Nematology,1980,26:69-74.
    [107] Atkinson H J, Lillry C, Urwin, P. E., McPherson, M. J. Engineering resistance to plant parasitic nematodes [A].In the physiology and biochemistry of free-living and plant-parasitic nematodes[C].1998,381-413.
    [108] Jahier,J.Utilization of deletions to location a gene for resistance cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae),on an Aegilops ventricosa chromosome [J].Plant Breeding,1996, 115:282-284.
    [109] Delibes,A.,Romero,D.,Agudaed,S.,et al.Resistance to the cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae Woll.) transferred from the wild grass Aegilops ventricosa to hexaploid wheat by a“stepping—stone”procedure [J].Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1993,87:402-408.
    [110] Eastwood R.F,Lagudah,E.S,Appels,R.A directed search for DNA sequences tightly cereal cyst nematode resistance gene in Triticumtauschii [J].Genome,1994,37:311-319.
    [111] Kerry,B.R.and Crump,O.H.Observation on fungal parasites of females and eggs of the cereal cyst nematode Heterodera avenae and other cyst nematodes[J].Nematologica, 23:193-201
    [112]赵英淑.禾谷孢囊线虫寄生性真菌-轮枝菌的初步研究[D].中国农业科学院,2002.
    [113] Sharma,D.P.and Swarup,A.Effect of short term waterlogging on growth,yield and mineral composition of wheat in sodic soils under flied condition [J].Plant and Soil,1988 107:137-143
    [114] Khan,A.,Williams K,L.,Helena K.M.Infection of plant-parasitic nematodes by Paecilomyces lilacinus and Monacrosporium lysipagum [J].BioControl,2006,51:659-678
    [115]吴绪金,杨卫星,孙炳剑等.不同药剂处理对小麦禾谷胞囊线虫的防治效果[J].河南农业科学,2007,5:57-60
    [116] Kaushal,K.K.and Dlehawan S.C. Effect of some chemicals on emergence and mortality of Heterodera avenae larvae[J].Indian Journal of Nematology,1988,18:155-157
    [117] Subbotin S A,Sturhan D,Rumpenhorst H J,et al.Description of the Australian cereal cyst nematode Heterodera australis sp.n. (Tylenchida:Heteroderidae)[J].Russian Journal of Nematology,2002,10(2):139-148.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700