《北学派》与楚辞关联研究
摘要
本论文主要考察研究朝鲜朝后期北学派文人李德懋与朴齐家在诗歌创作过程中接受屈原以及楚辞文学的状况。
中国与韩国是近邻国家,由于地理上的原因,在漫长的历史发展过程中,中韩两国的文化交流非常频繁。在这种文化氛围之下,韩国古代文学自然而然地受到中国文学的影响。根据“三国史记”“旧唐书”等资料可知载入楚辞的“文选”在统一新罗以前已经流入到朝鲜半岛,而且成为当时教育青少年的必读书,被列为选拔朝廷官吏的重要试科之一。屈原的精神及楚辞因此在韩半岛开始扎根。许多韩国古代诗人不仅在诗中写到屈原,而且在诗话中也予以评论。朝鲜朝时期主张实学思想的北学派也深受屈原及其楚辞的影响。北学派和屈原虽然生活在不同的时代和国家,但他们所处的经历,思想,品格等方面却有着类似之处,这是北学派接受屈原及楚辞的主要原因。
屈原是伟大的爱国诗人,他的独立不前的人格,忧国忧民的政治责任感和锲而不舍的理想追求代表了士人精神中最优秀的层面。
李德懋与朴齐家是庶子出身,因此他们不能正常途径致仕,实现政治抱负。在理想和现实的矛盾冲突及其苦闷中把屈原的“离骚”当作最亲近的“朋友“来安慰自己。把自己的怀才不遇与不幸联系到屈原的悲剧命运,通过诗歌抒发同病相怜之情,创造性地继承和发展了香草美人的传统审美意象。
通过屈原与李德懋,朴齐家的比较研究,我们可以看到汉文学的形式与内容都跟中国文学有着密切联系。李德懋,朴齐家不仅接受了屈原的人格,思想因素,而且接受了屈原的象征手法、“借景抒情”、“感伤”的写作风格,更加丰富了自己的诗学思想,为朝鲜古代文学史增添了光彩做出了贡献。
In this paper, the main study of the late North Korean move and the Park School scholar Yi Deokmu Qijia in the process of poetry writing as well as the Songs of Chu Yuan to accept the status of literature.
China and South Korea is the neighboring countries, due to geographical reasons, in the long course of historical development, cultural exchange between China and South Korea are very frequent. In this cultural atmosphere, the Korean Classical Literature naturally by the impact of Chinese literature. According to "The Three Historical Records","Old Tang Dynasty" and other information included in The Songs of the South, we can see the "Selected Works" in the Unified Silla before the inflow to the Korean Peninsula, and became the education of youngpeople will study, was classified as a selection of court officials Section one of the important test. The spirit of Qu Yuan and the Songs of the South in the Korean Peninsula began to take root. Many of South Korea not only in the ancient poet Qu Yuan wrote poetry, and alsoto comment on poetry. North Korea during the Korean school thinking that it is also popular with the Northern School and the Songs of ChuYuan impact. Although the North School and Qu Yuan lived in different times and countries, but they are experiences, ideas, character andso has a similar, this is acceptable to the Northern School and the Songs of Chu Yuan's the main reason.
Qu Yuan was a great patriotic poet, he is not in front of an independent personality, sense of responsibility and care for the political ideals of perseverance on behalf of the scholars to pursue the spirit of the level of the best.
Yi Deokmu and Park is son Qijia origin, therefore they can not Sends Shi in the normal way to achieve political aspirations. In the contradiction between ideal and reality of conflict and depression in the Qu Yuan's "Encountering Sorrow" as a close "friend" to comfort themselves. Sees their talents wasted their own and, unfortunately, linked to the tragic fate of Qu Yuan through poetry to express feeling sorry for him, and creatively inherited and developed the tradition of aesthe tic beauty vanilla image.
Qu Yuan and Yi Deokmu through Park Qijia comparative study, we can see Chinese literature related to the form and content is closely related to Chinese literature. Yi Deokmu Park Qijia Yuan is not only accepted the personality, ideological factors Yi Deokmu, but also a symbolof Qu Yuan accepted practices, "lyric by King," "sentimental" writing style, enriched by its own ideological and poetics, in order to addNorth Korea Ancient Literary History has contributed to the glory.
中国与韩国是近邻国家,由于地理上的原因,在漫长的历史发展过程中,中韩两国的文化交流非常频繁。在这种文化氛围之下,韩国古代文学自然而然地受到中国文学的影响。根据“三国史记”“旧唐书”等资料可知载入楚辞的“文选”在统一新罗以前已经流入到朝鲜半岛,而且成为当时教育青少年的必读书,被列为选拔朝廷官吏的重要试科之一。屈原的精神及楚辞因此在韩半岛开始扎根。许多韩国古代诗人不仅在诗中写到屈原,而且在诗话中也予以评论。朝鲜朝时期主张实学思想的北学派也深受屈原及其楚辞的影响。北学派和屈原虽然生活在不同的时代和国家,但他们所处的经历,思想,品格等方面却有着类似之处,这是北学派接受屈原及楚辞的主要原因。
屈原是伟大的爱国诗人,他的独立不前的人格,忧国忧民的政治责任感和锲而不舍的理想追求代表了士人精神中最优秀的层面。
李德懋与朴齐家是庶子出身,因此他们不能正常途径致仕,实现政治抱负。在理想和现实的矛盾冲突及其苦闷中把屈原的“离骚”当作最亲近的“朋友“来安慰自己。把自己的怀才不遇与不幸联系到屈原的悲剧命运,通过诗歌抒发同病相怜之情,创造性地继承和发展了香草美人的传统审美意象。
通过屈原与李德懋,朴齐家的比较研究,我们可以看到汉文学的形式与内容都跟中国文学有着密切联系。李德懋,朴齐家不仅接受了屈原的人格,思想因素,而且接受了屈原的象征手法、“借景抒情”、“感伤”的写作风格,更加丰富了自己的诗学思想,为朝鲜古代文学史增添了光彩做出了贡献。
In this paper, the main study of the late North Korean move and the Park School scholar Yi Deokmu Qijia in the process of poetry writing as well as the Songs of Chu Yuan to accept the status of literature.
China and South Korea is the neighboring countries, due to geographical reasons, in the long course of historical development, cultural exchange between China and South Korea are very frequent. In this cultural atmosphere, the Korean Classical Literature naturally by the impact of Chinese literature. According to "The Three Historical Records","Old Tang Dynasty" and other information included in The Songs of the South, we can see the "Selected Works" in the Unified Silla before the inflow to the Korean Peninsula, and became the education of youngpeople will study, was classified as a selection of court officials Section one of the important test. The spirit of Qu Yuan and the Songs of the South in the Korean Peninsula began to take root. Many of South Korea not only in the ancient poet Qu Yuan wrote poetry, and alsoto comment on poetry. North Korea during the Korean school thinking that it is also popular with the Northern School and the Songs of ChuYuan impact. Although the North School and Qu Yuan lived in different times and countries, but they are experiences, ideas, character andso has a similar, this is acceptable to the Northern School and the Songs of Chu Yuan's the main reason.
Qu Yuan was a great patriotic poet, he is not in front of an independent personality, sense of responsibility and care for the political ideals of perseverance on behalf of the scholars to pursue the spirit of the level of the best.
Yi Deokmu and Park is son Qijia origin, therefore they can not Sends Shi in the normal way to achieve political aspirations. In the contradiction between ideal and reality of conflict and depression in the Qu Yuan's "Encountering Sorrow" as a close "friend" to comfort themselves. Sees their talents wasted their own and, unfortunately, linked to the tragic fate of Qu Yuan through poetry to express feeling sorry for him, and creatively inherited and developed the tradition of aesthe tic beauty vanilla image.
Qu Yuan and Yi Deokmu through Park Qijia comparative study, we can see Chinese literature related to the form and content is closely related to Chinese literature. Yi Deokmu Park Qijia Yuan is not only accepted the personality, ideological factors Yi Deokmu, but also a symbolof Qu Yuan accepted practices, "lyric by King," "sentimental" writing style, enriched by its own ideological and poetics, in order to addNorth Korea Ancient Literary History has contributed to the glory.
引文
[1]金宽雄,金秉活.比较文学概论.延边大学出版社,2003
[2]#12
[3]河正玉,張基權.屈原.明文堂,1992
[4]#12
[5]#12
[6]朴晟義.韓國文學背景研究.玄岩社,1972
[7]#12
[8]#12
[9]#12
[10]#12
[11]中国屈原学会编.中国楚辞学.学苑出版社,2004
[12]游国恩.游国恩楚辞论著集.中华书局,1962
[13]金开成.屈原辞研究.新星出版社,2005
[14]黄碧琏.屈原与楚文化研究.文津出版社有限公司,1998
[15]#12
[16]#12
[17]李民树编译.楚辞.明文堂,1992
[18]#12
[19]#12
[20]#12
[21]杨乃乔.比较文学概论.北京:北京大学出版社.2002
[22]刘萍.比较文学论纲.合肥:安徽人民出版社,2005
[23]金宽雄,金东勋主编.中朝古代诗歌比较研究.黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社,2005
[24]曹晋.屈原与司马迁的人格悲剧,上海古籍和出版社.2008
[25]黄崇浩.屈原:忠愤人生.长江文艺出版社,2000
[26]韩国汉诗学会.韩国汉诗研究.(?),1993
[27]#12
[28]李泽厚,刘纲纪.中国美学史.中国社会科学出版社,北京:1990
[29]金富軾,奉宣.(?).古典刊行會,1932
[30]刘煦,旧唐书.吉林人民出版社,199
[31]#12
[32]#12
[33]#12
[34]#12
[35]#12
[36]#12
[37]#12
[38]#12
[39]崔三龍.李德懋(?)文學.(?)漢文學(3).民音社,1991
[40]#12
[41]葛荃.屈原的政治人格与心态析论.中国古代近代文学研究.中国人民出版社,1999.9
[42]#12
[43]#12
[44]#12
[45]#12
[46]徐东日.李德懋文学研究-兼与中国文学相比较.延边大学博士学位论文,2002
[47]#12
[48]#12
[49]#12
[50]#12
[51]#12
[52]#12
[53]#12
[2]#12
[3]河正玉,張基權.屈原.明文堂,1992
[4]#12
[5]#12
[6]朴晟義.韓國文學背景研究.玄岩社,1972
[7]#12
[8]#12
[9]#12
[10]#12
[11]中国屈原学会编.中国楚辞学.学苑出版社,2004
[12]游国恩.游国恩楚辞论著集.中华书局,1962
[13]金开成.屈原辞研究.新星出版社,2005
[14]黄碧琏.屈原与楚文化研究.文津出版社有限公司,1998
[15]#12
[16]#12
[17]李民树编译.楚辞.明文堂,1992
[18]#12
[19]#12
[20]#12
[21]杨乃乔.比较文学概论.北京:北京大学出版社.2002
[22]刘萍.比较文学论纲.合肥:安徽人民出版社,2005
[23]金宽雄,金东勋主编.中朝古代诗歌比较研究.黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社,2005
[24]曹晋.屈原与司马迁的人格悲剧,上海古籍和出版社.2008
[25]黄崇浩.屈原:忠愤人生.长江文艺出版社,2000
[26]韩国汉诗学会.韩国汉诗研究.(?),1993
[27]#12
[28]李泽厚,刘纲纪.中国美学史.中国社会科学出版社,北京:1990
[29]金富軾,奉宣.(?).古典刊行會,1932
[30]刘煦,旧唐书.吉林人民出版社,199
[31]#12
[32]#12
[33]#12
[34]#12
[35]#12
[36]#12
[37]#12
[38]#12
[39]崔三龍.李德懋(?)文學.(?)漢文學(3).民音社,1991
[40]#12
[41]葛荃.屈原的政治人格与心态析论.中国古代近代文学研究.中国人民出版社,1999.9
[42]#12
[43]#12
[44]#12
[45]#12
[46]徐东日.李德懋文学研究-兼与中国文学相比较.延边大学博士学位论文,2002
[47]#12
[48]#12
[49]#12
[50]#12
[51]#12
[52]#12
[53]#12