微囊化异种坐骨神经组织移植对脊髓损伤大鼠T淋巴细胞亚群的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的脊髓损伤(spinal cord injury,SCI)后,于损伤处移植周围神经组织能够促进神经元的存活、轴突的再生及功能恢复[1-3],海藻酸钡微囊的免疫隔离效应使得异种移植成为可能。本实验将预变性处理的家兔坐骨神经组织细胞微囊化后移植到SD大鼠SCI处,观察大鼠脊髓半横断损伤后植入微囊化异种坐骨神经组织细胞对宿主外周血中T淋巴细胞亚群的影响,初步探讨微囊化异种坐骨神经组织细胞移植治疗脊髓损伤修复的可能机制。
     方法取健康成年家兔8只;健康成年Sprague-Dawley (SD)大鼠88只,随机将SD大鼠分为3组:A组(微囊化坐骨神经组织细胞移植组,n=40);B组(组织细胞悬液移植组,n=40);C组(正常对照,n=8)。分好组后对各组大鼠行右后肢运动功能BBB评分。取成年家兔预变性处理的双侧坐骨神经干制成组织细胞悬液,低速离心后与1.5%海藻酸钠溶液混合并喷入20 mmol/L的氯化钡溶液中制成微囊化坐骨神经组织细胞悬液。A、B组建立大鼠T10脊髓右半横断损伤模型,并分别在损伤处植入吸附10μl的微囊化组织细胞悬液的明胶海绵及组织细胞悬液的明胶海绵, C组未做任何处理。A组和B组随机取6只大鼠分别于术后第1、3、7、14、28d对右后肢运动功能进行BBB评分。A组和B组大鼠分别于术后的第1、3、7、14、28天各时相随机取8只大鼠断尾取血,另C组8只大鼠也行断尾取血术。流式细胞仪测定T淋巴细胞亚群CD4,CD8阳性细胞数。
     结果脊髓损伤(SCI)后,细胞悬液组CD4~+ T细胞数于第3天较正常对照组有升高(P<0.05),第7、14和28天时,该差异具有显著性(P<0.01);该组CD8~+ T细胞数于第7、14和28天时较正常对照组有差异(P<0.05)。而微囊组各时相CD4~+ T细胞数和CD8~+ T细胞数较正常对照组均无差异(P>0.05)。第7、14和28天,细胞悬液组CD4~+ T细胞数较微囊组有明显升高(P<0.01),该组CD8~+ T细胞数于第7、14和28天时,较微囊组有升高。各组术前右后肢运动功能BBB评分均为21分, SCI后第1、3、7天时均较低且各组间无明显差别;第14天时A组大鼠右后肢功能恢复好于B、C组(P <0.05);第28天时A组大鼠右后肢BBB评分较B、C组大鼠右后肢BBB评分差异有显著性(P <0.01)。SCI后,各组大鼠右后肢运动功能均有不同程度的恢复,但以微囊组恢复最好。
     结论微囊化异种坐骨神经组织移植可以有效地阻止大鼠CD4~+ T细胞和CD8~+T细胞的激活和增值,并能促进后肢运动功能恢复。
Objective Transplantation of peripheral nerve can enhance neuronal survival,axonal regeneration and functional rehabilitation after spinal cord injury (SCI). Barium-alginate microcapsules, which reveal an immunoisolation effect, make the xenotransplantation be possible. Here, the pretreated sciatic nerve tissue/cells from rabbit were microencapsulated and transplanted into the injured site of spinal cord in adult Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. The alterations in T lymphocyte subsets of these SD rats were observed. And the possible mechanism of the rehabilitation induced by the transplantation of the microencapsulated xeno-sciatic nerve tissue/cells treated SCI were discussed.
     Method Experiments were performed in 8 adult rabbits and 88 adult SD rats of either sex. All of the SD rats were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (transplantation of microencapsulated xeno-sciatic nerve tissue/cells, n=40), Group B (transplantation of xeno-tissue/cells suspension, n=40) and Group C (control group, n=8). After dividing, BBB score was enforced on right hindlimb of all rats. Bilateral sciatic nerves pretreated from rabbits were dissected under aseptic condition and made into nerve tissue/cells suspension. Following centrifugation at a low speed, the tissue/cells were mixed with 1.5% sodium alginate solution, which was then extruded into 20 mmol/L barium chloride solution by using a droplet generation device, forming microencapsulated sciatic nerve tissue/cells suspension. Group A and B were performed a right hemisection of spinal cord at T10 level and subsequently transplanted with the gelatin sponge sticking 10μl microencapsulated nerve tissue/cells suspension and the gelatin sponge sticking 10μl tissue/cells suspension respectively. On the 1st、3rd、7th、14th and 28th days postoperatively, 6 SD rats in group A and B, respectively and randomly, were subjected to behavioral testing using a Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) scoring system. Peripheral blood were collected from 8 SD rats in group A and B, respectively and randomly, by tail cutting on the 1st、3rd、7th、14th and 28th days postoperatively and the number of CD4~+ and CD8~+ T lymphocyte subsets were taken account of by using the flow cytometer. Same operations were performed in the 8 rats of group C.
     Result After operation, an increase was found in CD4~+ T cells of group B on the 3rd day postoperatively, comparing with group C (P<0.05). This increase became significant on the 7th、14th and 28th days postoperatively; the number of CD8~+ T cells increased comparing with group C on the 7th、14th and 28th days postoperatively(P<0.05). The difference of the number of CD4~+ T cells and CD8~+ T cells between group A and C does not possess statistic significance on each time phase. The difference of the number of CD4~+ T cells between group A and B was distinct on the 7th、14th and 28th days postoperatively, meanwhile the number of CD8~+ T cells of group B was higher than their counterpart in group A on the 7th、14th and 28th days postoperatively. BBB score of locomotive function was normal in group A, B and C before surgery, however it became low and no difference among each group on the 1st, 3rd, 7th days after SCI. Subsequently, the comparison between Group A and B existed a difference on the 14th days postoperatively (P <0.05). The score of Group A was significantly superior to that of Group B on the 28th days postoperatively, whose difference was remarkable (P <0.01), but them didn’t reach the normal level. The locomotive function of right hindlimbs of all rats got recovered to a greater or less extent, but Group A was the best.
     Conclusion: microencapsulated sciatic nerve tissue can prevent the rat’s CD4~+ T and CD8~+ T cells from activation and proliferation and improve the rehabilitation of locomotive function of hind limb of the rats with SCI.
引文
[1] Oudega M, Xu XM. Schwann Cell Transplantation for Repair of the Adult Spinal Cord. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23(3-4):453-467
    [2] Golden KL, Pearse DD, Blits B, et al. Transduced Schwann cells promote axon growth and myelination after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2007; 207(2):203-217
    [3] Reier PJ. Cellular transplantation strategies for spinal cord injury and translational neurobiology. NeuroRx 2004; 1(4):424-451
    [4] Bunge RP, Puckett WR, Becerra JL, et al. Observations on the pathology of human spinal cord injury. A review and classification of 22 new cases with details from a case of chronic cord compression with extensive focal demyelination. Adv Neurol 1993; 59: 75-89
    [5] Li S, Stys PK. Mechanisms of ionotropic glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity in isolated spinal cord white matter. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 1190-1198
    [6] Takami T, Oudega M, Bethea JR, et al. Methylprednisolone and interleukin-10 reduce gray matter damage in the contused Fisher rat thoracic spinal cord but not improve functional outcome. J Neurotrauma 2002; 19: 653-666
    [7] Zhang Z, Krebs CJ, Guth L. Experimental analysis of progressive necrosis after spinal cord trauma in the rat: etiological role of the inflammatory response. Exp Neurol 1997; 143: 141-152
    [8] Stokes BT, Jakeman LB. A murine model for experimental spinal cord injury. Spinal cord 2002; 40: 101-109
    [9] Feigin I, Geller EH, Wolf A. Absence of regeneration in the spinal cord of the young rat. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1951; 10: 420-425
    [10] Cheng H, Cao Y, Olson L. Spinal cord repair in adult paraplegic rat: partial restoration of hind limb function. Science 1996; 273: 510-513
    [11] Richardson PM, McGuinness UM, Aguayo AJ. Peripheral nerve autografts to the rat spinal cord: studies with axonal tracing methods. Brain Res 1982; 237: 147-162
    [12] Senoo E, Tamaki N, Fujimoto E, et al. Effects of prelesioned peripheral nerve graft on nerve regeneration in the rat spinal cord. Neurosurgery 1998; 42: 1347-1356
    [13] Qin DX, Zou XL, Luo W, et al. Expression of some neurotrophins in the spinal motoneurons after cord hemisection in adult rats. Neurosci 2006; 410: 222~227
    [14] Schnell L, fearn S, Klassen H. Acute inflammatory responses to mechanical lesions in the CNS: differences between brain and spinal cord. European Journal of Neuroscience 1999; 11: 3648-3658
    [15] Anderson DK, Hall ED. Pathophysiology of spinal cord trauma. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1993; 22: 987-992
    [16] Kakulas BA. A review of the neuropathology of human spinal cord injury with emphasis onspecial features. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 1999; 22: 119-124
    [17] Fawcett JW, Asher RA. The glial scar and central nervous system repair. Brain Research Bulletin 1999; 49: 277-391
    [18] Busch SA, Silver J. The role of extracellular matrix in CNS regeneration, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2007; 17:120~127
    [19] Mandemakers WJ, Barres BA. Axon regeneration: it’s getting crowded at the gates of TROY. Curr Biol 2005; 15: 302~305
    [20] Heumann R, Lindholm D, Bandtlow C, et al. Differential regulation of mRNA encoding nerve growth factor and its receptor in rat sciatic nerve during development, degeneration, and regeneration: role of macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1987; 84: 8735-8739
    [21] Acheson A, Barker PA, Alderson RF, et al. Detection of brain-derived neurotrophic factor-like activity in fibroblasts and Schwann cells: inhibition by antibodies to NGF. Neruon 1991; 7: 265-275
    [22] Meyer M, Matsuoka I, Wetmore C, et al. Enhanced synthesis of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the lesioned peripheral nerve: different mechanisms are responsible for the regulation of BNDF and NGF mRNA. J Cell Biol 1992; 119: 45-54
    [23] Offenhauser N, Bohm-matthaei R, Tsoulfas P, et al. Developmental regulation of full-length trkC in the rat sciatic nerve. Eur J Neurosci 1995; 7: 917-925
    [24] Springer JE, Mu X, Bergmann LW, et al. Expression of GDNF mRNA in rat and human nervous tissue. Exp Neurol 1994; 127: 167-170
    [25] Neuberger TJ, Devries GH. Distribution of fibroblast growth factor in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons and Schwann cell. II. Redistribution after neural injury. J Neurocytol 1993; 22: 449-460
    [26] Imaizumi T, Lankford KL, Kocsis JD. Transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells or Schwann cells restores rapid and secure conduction across the transected spinal cord. Brain Res 2000; 854: 70-78
    [27] Pinzon A, Calancie B, Oudega M, et al. Conduction of impulses by axons regenerated in a Schwann cell graft in the transected adult rat thoracic spinal cord. J Neurosci Res 2001; 64: 533-541
    [28] Bunge MB, Pearse DD. Transplantation strategies to promote repair of the injured spinal cord. J Rehabil Res 2003; 40: 55-62
    [29] Oudeaga M, Moon LD, de Almeida Leme. Schwann cells for spinal cord repair. J Med Bill Res 2005; 38: 825-835
    [30] 刘德明, 刘德伍, 刘曾旭等. 微囊化施万细胞异种移植对大鼠脊髓损伤修复的影响. 解剖学报 2003, 34(6): 577-577
    [31] Kwon BK, Tetzlaff W, Grauer JN, et al. Pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Spine J 2004; 4: 451~464
    [32] Oudega M, Vargas CG, Weber AB, et al. Long-term effects of methylprednisolone following transection of adult rat spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci 1999; 11: 2453~2464
    [33] McPhail LT, Stirling DP, Tetzlaff W, et al. The contribution of activated phagocytes and myelin degeneration to axonal retraction/dieback following spinal cord injury. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 20: 1984-1994
    [34] Xu XM, Guenard V, Kleitman N, Bunge MB. Axonal regeneration into Schwann cell-seeded guidance channels grafted into transected adult rat spinal cord. J Comp Neurol 1995; 351: 145–160
    [35] Xu XM, Zhang SX, Li H, et al. Regrowth of axons into the distal spinal cord through a Schwann-cell-seeded mini-channel implanted into hemisected adult rat spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci 1999; 11: 1723–1740
    [36] David S, Aguayo Aj. Axonal elongation into peripheral nervous system bridges after central nervous system injury in adult rats. Science 1981; 241: 931–933
    [37] Bamber NI, Li H, Lu X, et al. Neurothrophins BDNF and NT-3 promote axonal re-entry into the distal host spinal cord through Schwann cell-seeded minichannels. Eur J Neurosci 2001; 13: 257–268
    [38] Xu XM, Guenard V, Kleitman N, et al. A combination of BDNF and NT-3 promotes supraspinal axonal regeneration into Schwann cell grafts in adult rat thoracic spinal cord. Exp Neurol 1995; 134: 261–272
    [39] Davies SJA, Fitch MT, Memberg SP, et al. Regeneration of adult axons in white matter tracts of the central nervous system. Nature 1997; 390: 680–683
    [40] Mc Keon RJ, Schreiber RC, Rudge JS, et al. Reduction of neurite outgrowth in a model of glial scarring following CNS injury is correlated with the expression of inhibitory molecules on reactive astrocytes. J Neurosci 1994; 11: 3398–3411
    [41] Moon LDF, Asher RA, Rhodes KE, Fawcett JW. Regeneration of CNS axons back to their target following treatment of adult rat brain with chondroitinase ABS. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4: 465–466
    [42] Fukunaga S, Sasaki S, Fu T, et al. Experimental study of neural repair of the transected spinal cord using peripheral nerve graft. J Orthop Sci 2004; 9: 605-612
    [43] Carson MJ, Doose JM, Melchior B, et al. CNS immune privilege: hiding in plain sight. Immunol Rev 2006; 213: 48-65
    [44] Streit WJ. Microglia as neuroprotective immunocompetent cells of the CNS. Glia 2002; 40(2): 133-139
    [45] Barker RA, Widner H. Immune problems in central nervous system cell therapy. NeuroRx 2004; 1(4): 472-481
    [46] Cserr HF, DePasquale M, Harling-Berg CJ, et al. Afferent and efferent arms of the humoral immune response to CSF-administered albumins in a rat model with normal blood-brain barrier permeability. J Neuroimmunol 1992; 41: 195–202
    [47] Cserr HF, Knopf PM. Cervical lymphatics, the blood-brain barrier and the immunoreactivity of the brain: a new view. Immunol Today 1992; 13: 507–512
    [48] Finsen B, Oteruleo F, Sorensen T, et al. Immunocytochemical characterization of the cellular immune response to intracerebal xenografts of brain tissue. Pro Brain Res 1988; 78: 261-270
    [49] Mason DW, Charlton HM, Jones AJ, et al. The fate of allogeneic and xenogeneic tissue transplanted to the ventricle of rodents. Neuroscience 1986; 19: 685-694
    [50] Sloan DJ, Wood MJ, Charlton HM. The immune response to intracerebral neural grafts. Trends Neurosci 1991; 14: 341-346
    [51] Freed WJ, Dymecki J, Poltorak M, et al. Intracerebral brain allografts and xenografts: studies of survival and rejection with and without systemic sensitization. Pro Brain Res 1988; 78: 233-241
    [52] Rocha PN, Plumb TJ, Crowley SD, Coffman TM. Effector mechanisms in transplant rejection. Immunol Rev 2003; 196:51-64
    [53] Salama AD, G Remuzzi, WE Harmon, et al. Challenges to achieving clinical transplantation tolerance. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2001; 108: 943-948
    [54] Wood KJ, S Sakaguchi. Regμlatory T cells in transplantation tolerance. Nature Reviews Immunology 2003; 3: 199-210
    [55] Hong JC, Kahan BD. Immunosuppressive agents in organ transplantation: past, present, and future. Semin Nephrol 2000; 20(2): 108-125
    [56] Lim F, Sun AM. Microencapsulated islets as bioartificial endocrine pancreas. Science 1980; 210: 908-910
    [57] Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma 1995 12(1): 1-21
    [58] Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. MASCIS evaluation of open field locomotor scores: effects of experience and teamwork on reliability. J Neurotrauma 1996; 13(2): 343-354
    [59] 杨迎暴,朴英杰.脊髓损伤模型的建立及其评价标准.中华创伤杂志 2002; 18(3): 187~190
    [60] 傅强,侯铁胜,鲁凯伍等. 大鼠胸段脊髓损伤后后肢运动功能不同评价标准的比较研究. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志 2001; 11(5): 278-281
    [61] Takami T, Oudega M, Bates M L, et al. Schwann Cell But Not Olfactory Ensheathing Glia Transplants Improve Hindlimb Locomotor Performance in the Moderately Contused Adult Rat Thoracic Spinal Cord. The Journal of Neuroscience 2002; 22(15): 6670~6681
    [62] Hurtado A, Moon LDF, Maquet V, et al. Poly (D,L-lactic acid) macroporous guidance scaffolds seeded with Schwann cells genetically modified to secrete a bi-functional neurotrophin implanted in the completely transected adult rat thoracic spinal cord. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 430~442
    [63] Fouad K, Schnell L, Bunge M B, et al. Combining Schwann cell bridges and olfactory- ensheathing glia grafts with chondroitinase promotes locomotor recovery after complete transection of the spinal cord. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 1169~1178
    [64] Bunge MB. Bridging areas of injury in the spinal cord. Neuroscientist 2001; 7: 325~339
    [65] Blits B, Oudega M, Boer G J, et al. Adenoassociated viral vector-mediated neurotrophin gene transfer in the injured adult rat spinal cord improves hindlimb function. Neurosci 2003; 118(1): 271~281
    [66] Gupta R, Gray M, Chao T, et al. Schwann cells upregulate vascular endothelial growth factor secondary to chronic nerve compression injury. Muscle Nerve 2005; 31: 452~460
    [67] Gupta R, Rowshan K, Chao T, et al. Chronic nerve compression induces local demyelination and remyelination in a rat model of carpal tunnel syndrome. Exp Neurol 2004; 187: 500~508
    [68] Keilhoff G, Fansa H, Schneider W, et al. In vivo predegeneration of peripheral nerves: An effect technique to obtian activated Schwann cells for nerves conduits. J Neurosci Methods 1999;89(1): 17~24
    [69] 程飚, 陈峥嵘. 成年兔坐骨神经雪旺细胞的分离纯化培养. 复旦学报(医学科学版) 2001; 28(3): 230~232
    [70] Gupta R, Truong L, Bear D, et al. Shear stress alters the expression of myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) and myelin basic protein (MBP) in Schwann cells. J Orthop Res 2005; 23: 1232~1239
    [71] Alexandre R, Nitin B, Sourabh S, et al. Transplantation of Preconditioned Schwann Cells in Peripheral Nerve Grafts After Contusion in the Adult Spinal Cord. Improvement of Recovery in a Rat Model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 2400~2410
    [72] Engelhardt B, Ransohoff RM. The ins and outs of T-lymphocyte trafficking to the CNS: anatomical sites and molecular mechanisms. Trends Immunol 2005; 26: 485-495
    [73] Schwartz M. Autoimmune involvement in CNS trauma is beneficial if well controlled. Prog Brain Res 2000; 128: 259-263
    [74] Carson MJ, Doose JM, Melchior B, et al. CNS immune privilege: hiding in plain sight. Immunological reviews 2006; 213: 48-65
    [75] Ransohoff RM, Kivisakk P, Kidd G. Three or more routes for leukocyte migration into the central nervous system. Nat Rev Immunol 2003; 3: 569-580
    [76] Matyszk MK, Perry VH. Demyelination in the central nervous system following a delayed-type hypersensitivity response to bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Neuroscience 1995; 64: 967-977
    [77] Matyszk MK, Townsend MJ, Perry VH. Ultrastructural studies of an immune-mediated inflammatory response in the CNS parenchyma directed against a non-CNS antigen. Neuroscience 1997; 78: 549-560
    [78] Bell MD, Taub DD, Perry VH. Overriding the brain’s intrinsic resistance to leukocyte recruitment with intraparenchymal injections of recombinant chemokines. Neuroscience 1996; 74: 283-292
    [79] Goverman J, Brabb T, Paez A, et al. Initiation and regulation of CNS autoimmunity. Crit Rev Immumnol 1997; 17: 469-480
    [80] de Vos AF, van Meurs M, Brok HP, et al. Transfer of central nervous system autoantigens and presentation in secondary lymphoid organs. J Immunol 2002; 169: 5415-5423
    [81] Melchior B, Puntambekar SS, Carson MJ. Microglia and the control of autoreactive T cell responses. Neurochem Int 2006; 49: 145-153
    [82] Neumann H. Control of glial immune function by neurons. Glia 2001; 36: 191-199
    [83] Becher B, Durell BG, Miga AV, et al. The clinical course of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and inflammation is controlled by the expression of CD40 within the central nervous system. J Exp Med 2001; 193: 967-974
    [84] Carson MJ, Reilly CR, Sutcliffe JG, et al. Disproportionate recruitment of CD8+ T cells into the central nervous system by professional antigen-presenting cell. Am J Pathol 1999; 154: 481-494
    [85] Gould DS, Auchincloss H Jr. Direct and indirect recognition: the role of MHC antigens in graft rejection. Immunology Today 1999; 20: 77-82
    [86] Germain RN, I Stefanova. The dynamics of T cell receptor signaling: complex orchestration and the key roles of tempo and cooperation. Annual Review of Immunology 1999; 19: 467-522
    [87] Jameson SC. Maintaining the norm: T cell homeostasis. Nature Reviews Immunology 2002; 2: 547-556
    [88] Kaech SM, EJ Wherry, R Ahmed. Effector and memory T cell differentiation: implications for vaccine development. Nature Review Immunology 2002; 2: 251-262
    [89] Pribila JT, AC Quale, KL Mueller, et al. Integrins and T cell-mediated immunity. Annual Review of Immunology 2004; 22: 157-180
    [90] Samelson LE. Singal transduction mediated by the T cell antigen receptor: the role of adapter proteins. Annual Review of Immunology 2002; 20: 371-394
    [91] 李崇辉, 薛毅珑, 罗芸等. APA微囊对免疫细胞和细胞因子隔离效应的研究.中国免疫学杂志 2000; 16(5): 259-261
    [92] Yoshioka Y, Suzuki R, Oka H, et al. A novel cytomedical vehicle capable of protecting cells against complement. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 305(2): 353~358
    [93] 薛毅珑. 重视微囊化人工细胞在医学中应用的研究. 解放军医学杂志 1999; 24(4): 235~237
    [94] 马小军, 何洋, 雄鹰等. 组织细胞移植用生物微胶囊技术介绍. 中华整形外科杂志 2000; 16(5): 267~269
    [95] de Vos P, van Hoogmoed CG, van Zanten J, et al. Long-term biocompa- tibility and function of microencapsulated pancreatic islets. Biomaterials 2003; 24(2): 305-312
    [96] 赖宏,陈丽,武传龙等. 微囊化人胎胰岛移植治疗小鼠实验性糖尿病的观察.中国现代普通外科进展 2002; 1: 23-25
    [1] Lim F, Sun AM. Microencapsulated islets as bioartificial endocrine pancreas. Science 1980; 210: 908–10
    [2] Soon-Shiong P, Feldman E, Nelson R, et al. Long-term reversal of diabetes in the large animal model by encapsulated islet transplantation. Transplant Proc 1992; 24(6): 2946–7
    [3] De Vos P, De Haan BJ, Wolters GHJ, et al. Improved biocompatibility but limited graft survival after purification of alginate for microencapsulation of pancreatic islets. Diabetologia 1997; 40: 262–70
    [4] Omer A, Duvivier-Kali VF, Trivedi N, et al. Survival and maturation of microencapsulated porcine neonatal pancreatic cell clusters transplanted into immunocompetent diabetic mice. Diabetes 2003; 52: 69–75
    [5] Zimmermann H, Zimmermann D, Reuss R, et al. Towards a medically approved technology for alginate-based microcapsules allowing long-term immunoisolated transplantation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16: 491–501
    [6] Koo J, Chang TSM. Secretion of erythropoietin from microencapsulated rat kidney cells. Int J Artif Organs 1993; 16: 557–60
    [7] Chang PL, Shen N, Westcott AJ. Delivery of recombinant gene products with microencapsulated cells in vivo. Hum Gene Ther 1993; 4: 433–40
    [8] Liu HW, Ofosu FA, Chang PL. Expression of human factor IX by microencapsulated recombinant fibroblasts. Hum Gene Ther 1993; 4: 291–301
    [9] Cieslinski DA, Humes HD. Tissue engineering of a bioartificial kidney. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994; 43: 678–81
    [10] Wong H, Chang TM. Bioartificial liver: implanted artificial cells microencapsulated living hepatocytes increases survival of liver failure rats. Int J Artif Organs 1986; 9: 335–6
    [11] Aebischer P, Russell PC, Christenson L, et al. A bioartificial parathyroid. ASAIO Trans 1986; 32: 134–7
    [12] Aebischer P, Goddard M, Signore AP, et al. Functional recovery in hemiparkinsonian primates transplanted with polymerencapsulated PC12 cells. Exp Neurol 1994; 126: 151–8
    [13] Hasse C, Klo¨ ck G, Schlosser A, et al. Parathyroid allotransplantation without immunosuppression. Lancet 1997; 350: 1296–7
    [14] Soon Shiong P, Heintz RE, Merideth N, et al. Insulin independence in a type 1 diabetic patient after encapsulated islet transplantation. Lancet 1994; 343: 950–1
    [15] Calafiore R, Basta G, Luca G, et al. Microencapsulated pancreatic islet allografts into nonimmunosuppressed patients with type 1 diabetes: first two cases. Diabetic Care 2006; 29: 137–8
    [16] Williams DF. Summary and definitions. Progress in biomedical engineering: definition in biomaterials (4). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher BV; 1987. p. 66–71
    [17] De Vos P, Van Schilfgaarde R. Biocompatibility issues. In: Ku¨ htreiber WM, Lanza RP, Chick WL, editors. Cell encapsulation technology and therapeutics. Boston: Birkha¨ user; 1999. p. 63–79
    [18] De Vos P, Tatarkiewicz K. Considerations for successful transplantation of encapsulated pancreatic islets. Diabetologia 2002; 45: 159–73
    [19] Zielinski BA, Aebischer P. Chitosan as a matrix for mammalian cell encapsulation. Biomaterials 1994; 15: 1049–56
    [20] Iwata H, Amemiya H, Matsuda T, et al. Evaluation of microencapsulated islets in agarose gel as bioartificial pancreas by studies of hormone secretion in culture and by xenotransplantation. Diabetes 1989; 38(Suppl. 1): 224–5
    [21] Dawson RM, Broughton RL, Stevenson WT, et al. Microencapsulation of CHO cells in a hydroxyethyl methacrylate-methyl methacrylate copolymer. Biomaterials 1987; 8: 360–6
    [22] Kessler L, Pinget M, Aprahamian M, et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of the properties of an artificial membrane for pancreatic islet encapsulation. Horm Metab Res 1991; 23: 312–7
    [23] Cruise GM, Hegre OD, Lamberti FV, et al. In vitro and in vivo performance of porcine islets encapsulated in interfacially photopolymerized poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate membranes. Cell Transplant 1999; 8: 293–306
    [24] Fritschy WM, Wolters GH, Van Schilfgaarde R. Effect of alginatepolylysine- alginatemicroencapsulation on in vitro insulin release from rat pancreatic islets. Diabetes 1991; 40: 37–43
    [25] King A, Sandler S, Andersson A, et al. Glucose metabolism in vitro of cultured and transplanted mouse pancreatic islets microencapsulated by means of a highvoltage electrostatic field. Diabetes Care 1999; 22 Suppl. 2B121-6 *LHM
    [26] De Haan BJ, Faas MM, De Vos P. Factors influencing insulin secretion from encapsulated islets. Cell Transplant 2003; 12: 617–25
    [27] Sandler S, Andersson A, Eizirik DL, et al. Assessment of insulin secretion in vitro from microencapsulated fetal porcine islet-like cell clusters and rat, mouse, and human pancreatic islets. Transplantation 1997; 63: 1712–8
    [28] Lopez-Avalos MD, Tatarkiewicz K, Sharma A, et al. Enhanced maturation of porcine neonatal pancreatic cell clusters with growth factors fails to improve transplantation outcome. Transplantation 2001; 71: 1154–62
    [29] Donati I, Holtan S, Morch YA, et al. New hypothesis on the role of alternating sequences in calcium-alginate gels. Biomacromolecules 2005; 6: 1031–40
    [30] Smidsrod O. Molecular basis for some physical properties of alginates in the gel state. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1974; 57: 263–74
    [31] De Vos P, Andersson A, Tam SK, et al. Advances and barriers in mammalian cell encapsulation for treatment of diabetes. Immun Endoc Metab Agents Med Chem 2006; 139-153
    [32] Smidsrod O, Skjak-Break G. Alginate as immobilization matrix for cells. Trends Biotechnol 1990; 8: 71–8
    [33] Martinsen A, Skja?k-BrG, Smidsrod O. Alginate as Immobilization material: I correlation between chemical and physical properties of alginate beads. Biotech Bioeng 1989; 33: 79–83
    [34] Thu B, Bruheim P, Espevik T, et al. Alginate polycation microcapsules II. Some functional properties. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1069–79
    [35] Skjak-Break G. Alginate as immobilization material II: determination of polyphenol contaminants by fluorescence spectroscopy, and evaluation of methods for their removal. Biotechnol Bioeng 1989; 33: 90–4
    [36] Klo¨ ck G, Frank H, Houben R, et al. Production of purified alginates suitable for use in immunoisolated transplantation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1994; 40: 638–43
    [37] Zimmermann U, Thurmer F, Jork A, et al. A novel class of amitogenic alginate microcapsules for long-term immunoisolated transplantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 944: 199–215
    [38] Dusseault J, Tam SK, Menard M, et al. Evaluation of alginate purification methods: effect on polyphenol, endotoxin, and protein contamination. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 76: 243–51
    [39] De Vos P, De Haan B, Van Schilfgaarde R. Effect of the alginate composition on the biocompatibility of alginate-polylysine microcapsules. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 273–8
    [40] Elliott RB, Escobar L, Calafiore R, et al. Transplantation of micro- and macroencapsulated piglet islets into mice and monkeys. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 466–9
    [41] De Vos P, Van Hoogmoed CG, Busscher HJ. Chemistry and biocompatibility of alginate-PLL capsules for immunoprotection of mammalian cells. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 60: 252–9
    [42] De Vos P, Van Hoogmoed CG, van Zanten J, et al. Long-term biocompatibility, chemistry, and function of microencapsulated pancreatic islets. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 305–12
    [43] Hasse C, Zielke A, Klock G, et al. Amitogenic alginates: key to first clinical application of microencapsulation technology. World J Surg 1998; 22: 659–65
    [44] Hasse C, Klock G, Zielke A, et al. Transplantation of parathyroid tissue in experimental hypoparathyroidism: in vitro and in vivo function of parathyroid tissue microencapsulated with a novel amitogenic alginate. Int J Artif Organs 1996; 19: 735–41
    [45] Klo¨ ck G, Frank H, Houben R, et al. Production of purified alginates suitable for use in immunoisolated transplantation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1994; 40: 638–43
    [46] Klo¨ ck G, Pfeffermann A, Ryser C, et al. Biocompatibility of mannuronic acid-rich alginates. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 707–13
    [47] Zekorn T, KlO¨ ck G, Horcher A, et al. Lymphoid activation by different crude alginates and the effect of purification. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 2952–3
    [48] Duvivier-Kali VF, Omer A, Parent RJ, et al. Complete protection of islets against allorejection and autoimmunity by a simple barium-alginate membrane. Diabetes 2001; 50: 1698–705
    [49] Geisen K, Deutschla¨ nder H, Gorbach S, et al. Function of barium alginate-microencapsulated xenogenic islets in different diabetic mouse models. In: Shafrir E, editor. Frontiers in diabetes research. Lessons from animal diabetes III. Smith-Gordon; 1990. p. 142–8
    [50] Gro¨ hn P, KlO¨ ck G, Zimmermann U. Collagen-coated Ba2+- alginate microcarriers for the culture of anchorage-dependent mammalian cells. BioTechniques 1997; 22: 970–2
    [51] Gro¨ hn P, KlO¨ ck G, Schmitt J, et al. Large-scale production of Ba2+-alginate-coated islets of Langerhans for immunoisolation. Exp Clin Endocrinol 1994; 102: 380–7
    [52] Siebers U, Zekorn T, Horcher A, et al. In vitro testing of rat and porcine islets microencapsulated in barium alginate beads. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 950–1
    [53] Zekorn T, Siebers U, Horcher A, et al. Barium-alginate beads for immunoisolated transplantation of islets of Langerhans. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 937–9
    [54] Omer A, Duvivier-Kali V, Fernandes J, et al. Long-term normoglycemia in rats receiving transplants with encapsulated islets. Transplantation 2005; 79: 52–8
    [55] Finegood DT, Scaglia L, Bonner-Weir S. Dynamics of b-cell mass in the growing rat pancreas: estimation with a simple mathematical model. Diabetes 1995; 44: 249–56
    [56] Omer A, Keegan M, Czismadia E, et al. Macrophage depletion improves survival of porcine neonatal pancreatic cell clusters contained in alginate macrocapsules transplanted into rats. Xenotransplantation 2003; 10: 240–51
    [57] Lanza RP, Chick WL. Immunoisolation: at a turning point. Immunol Today 1997; 18: 135–9
    [58] Lanza RP, Ecker DM, Ku¨ htreiber WM, et al. Simple and inexpensive method fortransplanting xenogeneic cells and tissues into rats using alginate gel spheres. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 3322
    [59] Lanza RP, Beyer AM, Chick WL. Xenogeneic humoral responses to islets transplanted in biohybrid diffusion chambers. Transplantation 1994; 57: 1371–5
    [60] Dufrane D, Steenberghe M, Goebbels RM, et al. The influence of implantation site on the biocompatibility and survival of alginate encapsulated pig islets in rats. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 3201–8

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700