三氯乙烯污染地下水的吹脱方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
三氯乙烯是一种有毒氯代有机溶剂,会对环境造成污染并通过各种途径最终进入人体造成伤害。空气吹脱法是去除地下水中三氯乙烯污染的一种快速且有效的方式。本文采用室内模拟方法,系统研究了空气吹脱方法和加热方法对模拟地下水中三氯乙烯的去除效果和影响因素。
     空气吹脱法处理地下水中三氯乙烯的研究实验结果表明,曝气量对去除速率有一定的影响,最佳曝气流量为0.5L/min。500mg/L的三氯乙烯在曝气流量0.5L/min时,去除速率可达最大值0.045mg·L-1·min-1。并且,同一曝气流量条件下,模拟体系中三氯乙烯浓度越高,其去除速率越大。在介质中,使用脉冲曝气机制在曝气20min内可以达到90%以上的去除率,比连续曝气机制能达到更佳的去除效果。
     加热法处理地下水中三氯乙烯的研究实验结果表明,随着反应温度的升高,三氯乙烯去除速率和去除率均随之增加,在80℃反应210min后去除效果良好,去除率可接近100%。采用红外光谱仪分析三氯乙烯加热后的代谢产物,结果表明期间可能形成的物质有COCl2、CO2、HCl。
     将空气吹脱和加热两种方法结合,采用正交试验方法研究其主要影响因素。实验结果表明,曝气量影响最大,温度其次,浓度居末。并且,模拟实际污染场地试验中,曝气30min后各污染物残留浓度均可达到标准。
Trichloroethylene is a kind of widespread polluted chlorinated organic solvent pollutants, it can through various channels enter human body to damage. Air Sparging method (AS method) is a rapid and effective remove method of trichloroethylene in the groundwater. This paper, through the laboratory simulation studied AS methods and heating method to eliminate trichloroethylene, for further study inside trichloroethylene pollution of groundwater management has certain directive significance.
     For Thermal Treatment of trichloroethylene conducted a preliminary study, with the rise of temperature, the concentration of trichloroethylene solution removal rate also increased. The higher the temperature, the faster trichloroethylene solution removal rate, and after 210min the better removal efficiency, finally the removal rate can nearly reach 100%. Different concentrations of trichloroethylene solution remove trends are very close, finally removal efficiency is also very close, the bigger concentration the bigger removal rate, but with the rise of temperature this trend become less obvious. And perliminary studied possible outcomes after Thermal Treatment of trichloroethylene by infrared spectrometer.
     Studies the removal efficiency and influencing factors of air sparging method removing trichloroethylene, the aeration flow has certain effect for removal rate, but not the bigger the better, on the same concentrations,0.5L/min has the largest removal rate of the four kinds of aeration flow, in 0.5L/min 500mg/L trichloroethylene the removal rate reached 0.045mg·L-1·min-1, very clearly proves the 0.5L/min aeration rate is the best aeration flow. The same aeration flow, the higher the concentration of trichloroethylene solution the bigger removal rate is. In a medium, pulse aeration mechanism is better than continuous aeration system.
     The orthogonal test method was used to study the progression of oxygen, temperature and concentration the three factors, and simulation field cases in a laboratory experiments, the results show that the air sparging method processing contaminated sites is an effective and feasible, remarkable time-consuming short method.
引文
[1]Borden R C, Gomez C A, Becker M T.Geochemical indicators of intrinsic bioremediation. Ground Water.1995,33 (2):180-189
    [2]龚子同,陈鸿昭,刘良梧.土壤环境变化与可持续发展.地理科学.2000,20(6):517-521
    [3]Sturchio N C.Chlorine isotope investigation of natural attenuation of trichloroethene in an aerobic aquifer.Environmental Science and Technology.1998,32 (20):30-37
    [4]俞光明,刘红樱,张泰丽.杭州市浅层地下水有机污染及其风险初步评价.资源调查与环境.2007,28(3):198-203
    [5]崔健,代雅建,按志娴.松花江沿岸某城市浅层地下水有机污染特征.环境卫生工程.2009,17(4):26-28
    [6]王昭,王慧珍,石建省.地下水有机污染研究进展.勘察科学技术.2008,1(6):23-26
    [7]Beneteau K M, Aravens R, Frape S K.Isotopic characterization of chlorinated solvents-laboratory and field results.Organic Geochemistry.1999,30 (8):739-753
    [8]Eguchi M, Kitagawa M. A field evaluation of in situ biodegradation of trichlomethylene through methane injection.Water Research.2001,35 (9):2145-2152
    [9]沈德钟.污染物的生物修复.北京:化学工业出版社.2002
    [10]Folsom B R, Chapman P J, Pritchard P H.Phenol and trichloroethylene degradation by Pseudomonas cepacia G4:kinetics and interactions between substrates.Applied and Environmental Microbiology.1990,56 (5):1279-1285
    [11]French W T, Brown L R, Downer D N.Effects of n-hexadecane and PM-100 clay on trichloroethylene degradation by Burkholderia cepacia.Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2002,92 (1):89-102.
    [12]Partrick R, Ford E, Quarles J.Groundwater Contamination in the USA.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.1987
    [13]Hirata T, Nakasugi, Yoshioka M.Groundwater pollution by volatile organochlorines in Japan and related phenomena in the substance environment.Water Science and technology.1992,125 (11):9-16
    [14]Richard E D.A history of the production and use of carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane in the United States:Part 2-trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane. Journal of Environmental Forensics.2000, 1 (2):83-93
    [15]Middeldorp J M, Aalst A, Rijnaarts H M. Stimulation of reductive dechlorination for in-situ bioremediation of a soil contaminated with chlorinated ethenes.Water Science and technology.1998,37 (8):105-110
    [16]张达政,陈鸿汉,李海明.浅层地下水卤代烃污染初步研究.中国地质.2002,29(3):326-329
    [17]张惠敏.三氯乙烯生产及应用现状.中国氯碱.2004,53(8):17-19
    [18]Toyoshi U, Junzo Y. Behavioral Effects of Trichloroethylene and Tetrachloroethylene in Mice. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.1997,58 (3):665-671
    [19]U.S.EPA.Assessment of trichloroethylene as a potentially toxic air pollutant; proposed rule. Federal Register; Part IV 1985,50 (246):52422-52425
    [20]杜群芳,徐新云,杨荣兴.三氯乙烯引起皮肤和肝脏损害的病例报告.职业与健康.2006,22(14):1060-1061
    [21]赵勇胜.地下水污染场地污染的控制与修复.吉林大学学报(地球科学版).2007,37(2):303-310
    [22]陈秀成,曹瑞任.地下水污染治理技术.中国给水排水.2004,1(5):158-160
    [23]Mackay D M, Cherry T A.Groundwater contamination:pump-and-treat remediation. Environment Science and Technology.1989,23 (6):630-636
    [24]钟佐燊.地下水有机污染控制及就地恢复技术研究进展(一).水文地质工程地质.2001,28(3):1-3
    [25]Siegrist R L, Rifai H S, Newell C J.Groundwater Contamination:Transport and Remediation (2nd).New Jersey:PTR Prentice Hall.1999
    [26]Gates D, Siegrist R L.In-Situ chemical oxidation of trichloroethylene using hydrogen peroxide.Environmental Engineering.1995,121 (9):639-644
    [27]Yan Y E, Schwartz F W.Kinetics and mechanisms for TCE oxidation by permanganate. Environmental Science and Technology.2000,34 (12):2535-2541
    [28]West O R, Cline S R, Holden W L.A Full Scale Demonstration of In Situ Chemical Oxidation Through Recirulaion at the X-701B Site:Field Operations and TCE Degradation. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.1998
    [29]Kelly K L, Marley M C, Sperry K L.In Situ chemical oxidation on MTBE//Proceedings of 2002 Joint CSCE/EWRI of ASCE International Conference on Environmental Engineering.July 21-24, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada.2002
    [30]Brown R A, Robinson D, Skladany GResponse to naturally occuring organic material: Permanganate versus persulfate//Proceedings of Consoil,2003-8th International FZK/TNO Conference on Contaminated Soil.May 12-16, Genter Belgium.2003,1692- 1698
    [31]Sperry K L, Marley M C, Bruell C J.Iron catalyzed persulfate oxidation of chlorinated solvents//Third International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey.CA, USA.20-23 May 2003
    [32]陶映初,陶举洲.环境电化学.北京:化学工业出版社.2003
    [33]Bruell C J, Segall B A, Walsh M T.Electroosmotic Removal of Gasoline Hydrocarbons and TCE from Clay.Environmental Engineering.1992,118 (1):68-83
    [34]蓝俊康.植物修复技术在污染治理中的应用现状.地质灾害与环境保护.2004,15(1):46-52
    [35]王思羽,石自堂.地下水环境污染及植物修复方法.中国农村水利水电.2008,(9):40-41
    [36]Kao C M, Chen S C, Su M C.Laboratory column studies for evaluating a barrier system for providing oxygen and substrate for TCE biodegradation.Chemosphere.2001,44 (5): 925-934
    [37]何小娟,刘菲,黄园英.利用零价铁去除挥发性氯代脂肪烃的试验.环境科学.2003,24(1):139-142.
    [38]陈翠柏,杨琦,沈照理.地下水三氯乙烯(TCE)生物修复研究进展.华东地质学院报.2003,26(1):10-14
    [39]David J W.Soil clean up by in-situ aeration ⅩⅨ effects of spill age on soil vapor extraction remediation rates separation science and technology. Separation Science and Technology.1994,29 (9):1645-1671
    [40]Jeffrey A.Adams.System effects on the remediation of contaminated saturated soils and groundwater using air sparging, Chicago, University of Illinois.1999
    [41]Hayden N J, Voice T C, Annable M D.Change in gasoline constituent mass transfer during soil venting. Journal of Environmental Engineering.1994,120 (6):1598-1615
    [42]Burchfield S D, Wilson D J.Groundwater cleanup by in-situ air sparging.Removal of dense nonaqueous phase liquid by sparging pipes.Separation Science and Technology. 1993,28:2529-2551
    [43]Semer R, Reddy K R.Mechanisms controlling toluene removal from saturated soils during in situ air sparging.Journal of Hazardous Materials.1998,57:209-230
    [44]李凌.土壤气相抽提法(SVE)去除土壤中挥发性有机污染物的研究.天津大学.2002
    [45]Johnston C D, Rayner J L, Patterson B M.Volatilisation and biodegradation during air sparging of dissolved BTEX contaminated groundwater.Journal of Contaminant Hydrology.1998,33:377-404
    [46]Wei Ji, Dahmani A, Ahlfield D P.Laboratory study of air asparging:air flow visualization. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation.1993,13:115-126
    [47]Semer R, Adams J A, Reddy K R.An experimental investigation of air flow patterns in saturated soils during air sparging.Journal of Geotechnical Geological Engineering. 1998,16 (1):59-76
    [48]Reddy K R, Adams J A. System effects on benzene removal from saturated soils and ground water using air sparging.Journal of Environmental Engineering.1998,124 (3): 288-299
    [49]Johnston C D, Rayner J L, Patterson B M. Volatilisation and biodegradation during air sparging of dissoved BTEX-contaminated groundwater.Journal of Contaminant Hydrology.1998,33:377-404
    [50]Benner M L, Stanford S M, Lee L S.Field and numercal analysis of in-situ air sparging:a case study, Journal of Hazardous Materials.2000,72:217-236
    [51]Murry W A, Lunardini R C.Site 5 air sparging pilot test,Naval Air Station Cecil Field, Florida, Journal of Hazardous Materrials.2000,72:121-145
    [52]卢芳文,张国华,王宏.采用地下水曝气-土壤气体抽提(AS/SVE)技术修复氯代烃污染场地.第四届海峡两岸土壤及地下水污染与整治研讨会
    [53]武强,王志强,杨淑君.地下水曝气工程技术研究—以德州胜利油田地下水石油污染治理为例.地学前缘.2007,14(6):214-221
    [54]Udell K S.Thermally enhanced removal of liquid hydrocarbon contaminants from soils and groundwater//Ward C H,Cherry J A,Scalf M R,eds.Subsurface Restoration.Chelsea, MI:Ann Arbor Press.1997,251-270
    [55]Udell K S, Sitar N, Hunt J R.Process for In Situ Decontamination of Subsurface Soil and Groundwater.United States Patent 5018576,1991
    [56]Davis E.How heat can enhance in-situ soil and aquifer remediation:Important chemical properties and guidance on choosing the appropriate technique.EPA/540/S-97/502 Robert S.Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory.1997
    [57]Udell K S, Stewart L D.Field study of in situ steam injection and vacuum extraction for recovery of volatile organic solvents.UCB-SEEHRL Report No.89-2.Berkeley, California:University of California, Berkeley.1989
    [58]Smith L A, Hinchee R E.In Situ Thermal Technologies for Site Remediation.Boca Raton:Lewis Publishers.1993
    [59]Heron G, Christensen T H, Heron T.Thermally enhanced remediation at DNAPL site:The competition between downward mobilization and upward volatilization//Proceedings of the First International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinsted and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, California, Columbus.May 18-21, Ohio: Battelle Press.1998
    [60]Kaslusky S F, Udell K S.A theretical model of air and steam coinjection to prevent the downward migration of DNAPLs during steam-enhanced extraction.Journal of Contamianant Hydrology.2002,55:213-232
    [61]Buelt J L, Oma K H.In-Situ Heating to Detoxify Organic Contaminated Soils.US Patent #4,957,393.1990
    [62]Heron G, Van Zutphen M,Christensen T H.Soil heating for enhanced remediation of chlorinated solvents:A laboratory study on resistive heating and vapor extraction in a silty,low-permeable soil contaminated with trichloroethylene.Environmental Science and Technology.1998,32 (10):1474-1481
    [63]Beyke GElectrical Resistance Heating for In-Situ Remediation of Soil and Groundwater. Presented at:In-Situ Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with NAPL:Fundamentals and Case Studies.Sponsored by Technology Innovation Office, Washington DC, Chicago.2002
    [64]Heron G, Carroll S, Nielsen S G.Full-scale removal of DNAPL contituents using steam-enhanced extraction and electrical resistance heating.Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation.2005,25 (4):92-107
    [65]Davis E.How heat can enhance in-situ soil and aquifer remediation:Important chemical properties and guidance on choosing the appropriate technique.EPA/540/S-97/502 Robert S.Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory.1997
    [66]Udell K S,, Itamura M T.Removal of dissolved solvents from heated heterogeneous soils during depressurization/Wickramanayake G B,Hinchee R E.Physical,Chemical,and Thermal Technologies:Remediation of Chlorinate and Recalcitrant Compounds. Columbus:Battelle Press.1998,57-62
    [67]Knauss K G, Copenhaver S C, Aines R D.Hydrous Pyrolysis/Oxidation Process for In Situ Destruction of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon and Fuel Hydrocarbon contaminants in Water and Soil.US Patent 6,127-592.Date Issued:3 Oct.2000
    [68]Betts K S.Technology combination cuts DNAPL cleanup time at Superfund site. Environmental Science and Technology.1998,32:359
    [69]Thornton J C, Wootan W L.Venting for the remoral of hydrocarbon vapors from gasoline contaminated soil.Journal of Environment Science and Health.1984, A17 (1):

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700