杨树云斑天牛成虫寄主定位中的信息化学物质
|
摘要
云斑天牛Batocera horsfieldi(Hope),属鞘翅目Coleoptera,天牛科Cerambycidae,是我国重要的一种林木蛀干害虫。这类害虫生活隐蔽,研究和防治比较艰难。成虫是其唯一裸露活动、有行为导向的虫态。因此,从云斑天牛大面积治理及工业用材品质的要求出发,成虫裸露活动期是研究和防治的关键。本课题在分析云斑天牛成虫寄主行为选择及分离鉴定其补充营养寄主和幼虫寄主挥发性化合物的基础上,利用触角电位仪(EAG)和Y型嗅觉仪鉴定出对成虫具有电生理及行为活性的化合物;并利用扫描电镜(SEM)观察了成虫头部附器的感器类型及分布,以期为开发利用天然活性物质来防治天牛提供一定的理论基础和技术支持。主要研究结果如下:
1.云斑天牛成虫对寄主植物的嗅觉反应
在室内利用Y型嗅觉仪测定云斑天牛不同生理状态的成虫对寄主植物的嗅觉反应,结果表明:以空气为对照时,补充营养寄主野蔷薇对未交配的雌雄成虫及已交配雌虫均有明显的吸引作用;幼虫(产卵)寄主杨树只对已交配雌虫具有明显的吸引作用。野蔷薇和杨树比较时,云斑天牛成虫对这两种寄主挥发性气味的趋性反应均没有显著差异。
2.寄主植物挥发性化合物的分离鉴定
利用顶空动态采集法和热脱附-气相色谱-质谱联用(TCT-GC-MS)分离鉴定了野蔷薇和杨树的挥发性化合物。结果表明:野蔷薇挥发性气味有10种组分,柠檬烯相对含量最高,3-蒈烯和β蒎烯次之;杨树挥发性气味有16种组分,反-2-己烯醛相对含量最高,己醛和顺-3-己烯醇次之。两者有5种共有组分,分别是己醛、反-2-己烯醇、顺-3-己烯醇、R型α蒎烯和β蒎烯,但相对含量上存在很大差异。
3.云斑天牛成虫对挥发性化合物的EAG反应
根据不同生理状态的云斑天牛成虫对浓度为100μg/μl的21种化合物溶液的EAG反应结果,筛选了8种电生理活性较高的化合物分别是顺-3-己烯醇、顺-2-戊烯醇、3-戊醇、3-蒈烯、己醛、反-2-己烯醛、反-2-己烯醇和1-戊烯-3-醇;云斑天牛成虫对上述8种化合物的EAG反应值绝大多数与浓度呈正相关,且顺-3-己烯醇、顺-2-戊烯醇、己醛、反-2-己烯醇和1-戊烯-3-醇在高浓度下引起的EAG反应在不同生理状态成虫之间存在一些显著差异。
4.云斑天牛成虫对挥发性化合物的行为反应
利用Y型嗅觉仪测试了云斑天牛成虫对8种电生理活性较强的化合物的行为反应,结果表明:有6种具有电生理活性的化合物具有行为活性,其中浓度为1和0.1μg/μl的顺-3-己烯醇以及1μg/μl的反-2-己烯醇对雄虫对有明显的吸引作用,浓度为1μg/μl的顺-3-己烯醇和0.1μg/μl的3-戊醇对雌虫有明显的吸引作用;而浓度为100μg/μl的3-蒈烯和1-戊烯-3-醇对两性成虫均有趋避作用,浓度为1和100μg/μl的反-2-己烯醛对雄虫有趋避作用。
5.云斑天牛头部附器感器的扫描电镜观察
利用扫描电镜观测云斑天牛成虫的触角、下颚须和下唇须,结果表明:云斑天牛成虫触角上有5类感器,即毛形感器、锥形感器(5种亚型)、刺形感器(2种亚型)、凹槽钉形感器、乳突形感器,且感器的类型、数量和分布存在明显的性二型现象。下颚须和下唇须均有毛形感器、长刺形感器、末梢锥形感器(2个亚型)、钟形感器和隙缝感器等5类感器,而感器的数量在雌雄之间、下唇须与下颚须之间存在着差异。
The longhorned beetle,Batocera horsfieldi(Hope)(Coleoptera:Cerambycidae),is one of most abundant and destructive cerambycids widely distributed in China.The larvae cryptic feeding habit makes the control of such wood-boring pests difficult.So to be effective,control strategies have to be based on controlling or killing longhorned beetle adults that are exposed to wild to feed and copulate.Our studies researched the behavioral and electrophysiological responses of B.horsfieldi adults to feeding- or larval-host plant odors present in headspace collections.In order to identify the range of feeding- or larval-host-associated volatiles that the longhomed beetles can detect,therefore,maybe develop attractants or reples for adults that could be used in a push-push control program. And we also researched the morphology,ultrastructure and distribution of sensilla on the antennae,mandible palp and labial palp of B.horsfieldi adults by scanning electron microscopy,to realize more about the olfaction recept mechanism in this species.The main results as follows:
1.Olfactometer Bioassays to host plant volatiles
When compared with the control air,both virgin sexes were significantly attracted to odors from Rosa multiflora Thunb.volatiles in olfactometer bioassays,mated females were attracted to volatiles from the two host plants.But all of the beetles tested showed no significant different responding between R.multiflora and Populus sp.
2.The identified compounds of host plant volatiles
10 and 16 compounds were identified from R.multiflora and P.sp.by TCT-GC/MS respectively,and 5 compounds common to both two host plant species included:hexanal, E-2-hexenal,Z-3-hexen-1-ol,1R-α-Pinene andβ-Pinene,but the relative proportion were different for each species.The mostly compounds of R.multiflora Thunb.are Limonene, 3-carene andβ-Pinene.E-2-Hexenal is the most abundant component of the floral scent of P.sp.,hexanal,Z-3-Hexen-1-ol and E-2-Hexen-1-ol acetate in the next place.
3.EAG activity of synthetic compounds
All of the identified compounds were tested for EAG responses of the B.horsfieldi antennae.According to the electrophysiological assessment of 100μg/μl compounds,we selected eight higher EAG-active components for EAG dose-response:Z-3-Hexen-1-ol, 3-pentanol,Z-2-Penten-1-ol,3-carene,Hexanal,E-2-Hexen-1-al,E-2-Hexen-1-ol and 1-penten-3-ol.Most of EAG responses of B.horsfieldi increased with stimulus strength. The EAG responses of Z-3-Hexen-1-ol,Z-2-Penten-1-ol,Hexanal,E-2-Hexen-1-ol and 1-penten-3-ol at the higher dose were significantly differences among mated female, virgin female and male.
4.Bioassay for behavioral activity of EAG-active compounds
When compared with the liquid paraffin(blank control),males showed a significantly preference for the Z-3-Hexen-1-ol at a dose of 1 and 0.1μg/μl and E-2-Hexen-1-ol at a dose of 1μg/μl,females showed a significantly preference to Z-3-Hexen-1-ol at a dose of 1μg/μl and to 3-Pentanol at a dose of 0.1μg/μl.Both of males and females showed a significantly preference for blank control over the 3-Carene and 1-penten-3-ol at a dose of 100μg/μl,and males showed a preference for blank control over the E-2-Hexen-1-al at a dose of 1μg/μl.
5.Observation of sensilla on the cephalic appendage of B.horsfieldi with SEM
The antennae,mandible palp and labial palp of B.horsfieldi adults were observed by scanning electron microscopy.The antennae contained five types sensilla,including sensilla trichodea,s.basiconica(including five subtypes:BⅠ～BⅤ),s.cheatica (including two subtypes:CHⅠand CHⅡ),s.grooved peg,s.cavitata-peg,respectively. Sexual dimorphism was found in B.horsfieldi,the length of the antennae of male were significantly longer than that of females;s.grooved peg was only found on the female antenna,and female antenna contained more s.BⅠ,s.BⅡand s.ChⅡthan males,while the number of s.BⅢwas fewer than that of males;the average length of s.cheatica of female was significantly longer than that of males.Both mandible palp and labial palp contained five types of sensilla,including s.trichodea,s.ChⅡ,s.twig basiconca,s. campullacea and s.aperture.Mandible palp contained more s.twig basiconca and fewer s. campullacea than labial palp.The number of s.twig basiconca was higher in female antennae,and s.campullacea was higher in male.
1.云斑天牛成虫对寄主植物的嗅觉反应
在室内利用Y型嗅觉仪测定云斑天牛不同生理状态的成虫对寄主植物的嗅觉反应,结果表明:以空气为对照时,补充营养寄主野蔷薇对未交配的雌雄成虫及已交配雌虫均有明显的吸引作用;幼虫(产卵)寄主杨树只对已交配雌虫具有明显的吸引作用。野蔷薇和杨树比较时,云斑天牛成虫对这两种寄主挥发性气味的趋性反应均没有显著差异。
2.寄主植物挥发性化合物的分离鉴定
利用顶空动态采集法和热脱附-气相色谱-质谱联用(TCT-GC-MS)分离鉴定了野蔷薇和杨树的挥发性化合物。结果表明:野蔷薇挥发性气味有10种组分,柠檬烯相对含量最高,3-蒈烯和β蒎烯次之;杨树挥发性气味有16种组分,反-2-己烯醛相对含量最高,己醛和顺-3-己烯醇次之。两者有5种共有组分,分别是己醛、反-2-己烯醇、顺-3-己烯醇、R型α蒎烯和β蒎烯,但相对含量上存在很大差异。
3.云斑天牛成虫对挥发性化合物的EAG反应
根据不同生理状态的云斑天牛成虫对浓度为100μg/μl的21种化合物溶液的EAG反应结果,筛选了8种电生理活性较高的化合物分别是顺-3-己烯醇、顺-2-戊烯醇、3-戊醇、3-蒈烯、己醛、反-2-己烯醛、反-2-己烯醇和1-戊烯-3-醇;云斑天牛成虫对上述8种化合物的EAG反应值绝大多数与浓度呈正相关,且顺-3-己烯醇、顺-2-戊烯醇、己醛、反-2-己烯醇和1-戊烯-3-醇在高浓度下引起的EAG反应在不同生理状态成虫之间存在一些显著差异。
4.云斑天牛成虫对挥发性化合物的行为反应
利用Y型嗅觉仪测试了云斑天牛成虫对8种电生理活性较强的化合物的行为反应,结果表明:有6种具有电生理活性的化合物具有行为活性,其中浓度为1和0.1μg/μl的顺-3-己烯醇以及1μg/μl的反-2-己烯醇对雄虫对有明显的吸引作用,浓度为1μg/μl的顺-3-己烯醇和0.1μg/μl的3-戊醇对雌虫有明显的吸引作用;而浓度为100μg/μl的3-蒈烯和1-戊烯-3-醇对两性成虫均有趋避作用,浓度为1和100μg/μl的反-2-己烯醛对雄虫有趋避作用。
5.云斑天牛头部附器感器的扫描电镜观察
利用扫描电镜观测云斑天牛成虫的触角、下颚须和下唇须,结果表明:云斑天牛成虫触角上有5类感器,即毛形感器、锥形感器(5种亚型)、刺形感器(2种亚型)、凹槽钉形感器、乳突形感器,且感器的类型、数量和分布存在明显的性二型现象。下颚须和下唇须均有毛形感器、长刺形感器、末梢锥形感器(2个亚型)、钟形感器和隙缝感器等5类感器,而感器的数量在雌雄之间、下唇须与下颚须之间存在着差异。
The longhorned beetle,Batocera horsfieldi(Hope)(Coleoptera:Cerambycidae),is one of most abundant and destructive cerambycids widely distributed in China.The larvae cryptic feeding habit makes the control of such wood-boring pests difficult.So to be effective,control strategies have to be based on controlling or killing longhorned beetle adults that are exposed to wild to feed and copulate.Our studies researched the behavioral and electrophysiological responses of B.horsfieldi adults to feeding- or larval-host plant odors present in headspace collections.In order to identify the range of feeding- or larval-host-associated volatiles that the longhomed beetles can detect,therefore,maybe develop attractants or reples for adults that could be used in a push-push control program. And we also researched the morphology,ultrastructure and distribution of sensilla on the antennae,mandible palp and labial palp of B.horsfieldi adults by scanning electron microscopy,to realize more about the olfaction recept mechanism in this species.The main results as follows:
1.Olfactometer Bioassays to host plant volatiles
When compared with the control air,both virgin sexes were significantly attracted to odors from Rosa multiflora Thunb.volatiles in olfactometer bioassays,mated females were attracted to volatiles from the two host plants.But all of the beetles tested showed no significant different responding between R.multiflora and Populus sp.
2.The identified compounds of host plant volatiles
10 and 16 compounds were identified from R.multiflora and P.sp.by TCT-GC/MS respectively,and 5 compounds common to both two host plant species included:hexanal, E-2-hexenal,Z-3-hexen-1-ol,1R-α-Pinene andβ-Pinene,but the relative proportion were different for each species.The mostly compounds of R.multiflora Thunb.are Limonene, 3-carene andβ-Pinene.E-2-Hexenal is the most abundant component of the floral scent of P.sp.,hexanal,Z-3-Hexen-1-ol and E-2-Hexen-1-ol acetate in the next place.
3.EAG activity of synthetic compounds
All of the identified compounds were tested for EAG responses of the B.horsfieldi antennae.According to the electrophysiological assessment of 100μg/μl compounds,we selected eight higher EAG-active components for EAG dose-response:Z-3-Hexen-1-ol, 3-pentanol,Z-2-Penten-1-ol,3-carene,Hexanal,E-2-Hexen-1-al,E-2-Hexen-1-ol and 1-penten-3-ol.Most of EAG responses of B.horsfieldi increased with stimulus strength. The EAG responses of Z-3-Hexen-1-ol,Z-2-Penten-1-ol,Hexanal,E-2-Hexen-1-ol and 1-penten-3-ol at the higher dose were significantly differences among mated female, virgin female and male.
4.Bioassay for behavioral activity of EAG-active compounds
When compared with the liquid paraffin(blank control),males showed a significantly preference for the Z-3-Hexen-1-ol at a dose of 1 and 0.1μg/μl and E-2-Hexen-1-ol at a dose of 1μg/μl,females showed a significantly preference to Z-3-Hexen-1-ol at a dose of 1μg/μl and to 3-Pentanol at a dose of 0.1μg/μl.Both of males and females showed a significantly preference for blank control over the 3-Carene and 1-penten-3-ol at a dose of 100μg/μl,and males showed a preference for blank control over the E-2-Hexen-1-al at a dose of 1μg/μl.
5.Observation of sensilla on the cephalic appendage of B.horsfieldi with SEM
The antennae,mandible palp and labial palp of B.horsfieldi adults were observed by scanning electron microscopy.The antennae contained five types sensilla,including sensilla trichodea,s.basiconica(including five subtypes:BⅠ～BⅤ),s.cheatica (including two subtypes:CHⅠand CHⅡ),s.grooved peg,s.cavitata-peg,respectively. Sexual dimorphism was found in B.horsfieldi,the length of the antennae of male were significantly longer than that of females;s.grooved peg was only found on the female antenna,and female antenna contained more s.BⅠ,s.BⅡand s.ChⅡthan males,while the number of s.BⅢwas fewer than that of males;the average length of s.cheatica of female was significantly longer than that of males.Both mandible palp and labial palp contained five types of sensilla,including s.trichodea,s.ChⅡ,s.twig basiconca,s. campullacea and s.aperture.Mandible palp contained more s.twig basiconca and fewer s. campullacea than labial palp.The number of s.twig basiconca was higher in female antennae,and s.campullacea was higher in male.
引文
1.蔡世民,黄一平,黄竞芳.侧柏提取物对双条杉天牛引诱作用的初步研究(Ⅰ)——提取物引诱活性测定.北京林业大学学报,1989,11(3):71-78
2.程红.青杨脊虎天牛触角感器类型及其对植物挥发物的反应.[硕士学位论文].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2006
3.程立超,迟德福.10种杨属植物树皮挥发油的化学成分分析.林业科学研究.2007,20(2):267-271
4.戴晓枫,丁红建.寄主植物挥发性它感化合物与害虫行为的关系.植物保护,2003,5:33-35.
5.丁铋,黄金水,黄海清.星天牛成虫行为及其机制的初步研究.林业科学研究,1995,8:53-57
6.杜家纬.植物-昆虫间的化学通讯及其行为控制.植物生理学报,2001,27(3):193-200
7.杜永均,严福顺.植物挥发性次生物质在植食性昆虫、寄主植物和昆虫天敌关系中的作用机理.昆虫学报,1994,37(2):233-250
8.樊慧,金幼菊,李继泉,陈华君.引诱植食性昆虫的植物挥发性信息化合物的研究进展.北京林业大学学报,2004,26(3):76-81
9.高瑞桐,王宏乾,徐邦新,郑世锴,王希群,龚益鸿.云斑天牛补充营养习性及与寄主树关系的研究.林业科学研究,1995,8(6):619-623
10.高瑞桐,郑世锴.利用成虫取食习性防治3种杨树天牛.北京林业大学学报,1998,20(1):43-48
11.郭丽.桑树对桑天牛引诱机制的研究.[硕士学位论文].保定:河北农业大学,2006
12.郭线茹,原国辉,蒋金炜,罗梅浩,马继盛.不同季节黑杨萎蔫叶片挥发物的化学成分分析.应用生态学报,2005,16(10):1822-1825
13.韩颖,张青文,路大光.松褐天牛触角感器的扫描电镜观察.昆虫知识,2005,(6):681-685
14.郝德君,马凤林,王焱,张永慧,戴华国.松墨天牛对不同生理状态黑松挥发物的触角生理和行为反应.应用生态学报,2006,17(6):1070-1074
15.贺萍,黄竞芳.光肩星天牛成虫的行为.昆虫学报,1993,36(1):51-55
16.洪健,高其康,徐正,徐颖.扫描电镜在昆虫学研究中的应用.电子显微学报,2001,20(4):489-490
17.胡江,李义龙,刘剑虹,郑润兰,陈树琼,杨富.麻点豹天牛成虫感器的扫描电镜研究.电子显微学报,2001,(4):499-500
18.黄金水,何学友,叶剑雄,黄衍庆,高美玲.苦楝引诱防治星天牛研究.林业科学,2001,37(4):58-64
19.嵇保中,钱范俊,严敖金.云斑天牛研究方法的改进.森林病虫通讯,1996,(1):45-46
20.嵇保中,魏勇,黄振裕.天牛成虫行为研究的现状与展望.南京林业大学学报,2002,26(2):79-83
21.嵇保中,钱范俊.云斑天牛生殖系统的研究.南京林业大学学报,1995,19(4):14-20
22.江望锦,嵇保中,刘曙雯,宋杰.天牛成虫信息素及嗅觉感受机制研究进展.昆虫学报, 2005,48(3):427-436
23.江望锦.松墨天牛成虫与寄主间化学信息联系机制的初步研究.[硕士学位论文].南京:南京林业大学,2005
24.蒋丽雅,朋金和,周健生,吕传海,卜厚平,苏元功.松褐天牛引诱剂Mat-1号的研究.森林病虫通讯,1997,3:5-7
25.蒋书楠,蒲富基,华立中.中国经济昆虫志第三十五册鞘翅目天牛科(三).北京:科学出版社,1985
26.巨云为,赵博光,成量,王维华,高世望.印楝提取物对云斑天牛成虫选择取食的影响.南京林业大学学报,2003,(5):85-87
27.李德家,刘益宁.光肩星天牛成虫性发育同日龄、补充营养以及交配之间的关系.西北林学院学报,1997,12(4):19-23
28.李德家,所雅彦,中岛忠一.光肩星天牛成虫交配行为机制研究.北京林业大学学报,1999,21(4):33-36
29.李建光.光肩星天牛对寄主植物挥发性物质的行为反应及作用机理的研究.[博士学位论文].北京:北京林业大学,2001
30.李娟,王满困,张志春等.云斑天牛成虫对植物气味的行为反应.林业科学,2008,44(6):165-170
31.李水清,张钟宁.马尾松枝条挥发性组分的鉴定及松墨天牛对其触角电生理反应.昆虫知识,2007,44(3):385-389
32.李文杰,邬承先.杨树天牛综合管理.北京:中国林业出版社,1993
33.李新岗,张克斌.黄斑星天牛成虫下颚须和下唇须的化学感受器.昆虫知识,1991,(6):357-358
34.刘芳,娄永根,程家安.虫害诱导的植物挥发物:植物与植事性昆虫及其天敌相互作用的进化产物.昆虫知识,2003,40(6):481-486
35.刘玉双,石福明.红缘吉丁(鞘翅目:吉丁虫科)触角感器的扫描电镜观察.昆虫学报,2005,58(3):469-472
36.娄永根,程家安.虫害诱导的植物挥发物的基本特性、生态学功能及释放机制.生态学报,2000,20(6):10972-21106
37.卢绍辉.黑杨Populus nigra L.气味物质诱集鳞翅目成虫生物学机理的研究.[硕士学位论文].郑州:河南农业大学,2002
38.鲁玉杰,张孝羲.信息化合物对昆虫行为的影响.昆虫知识,2001,38(4):262-266
39.陆群,张玉凤.光肩星天牛成虫头部附器超微结构的研究分析.内蒙古林业科技,2002,(01):16-19
40.陆水田,康建新,马新华.新疆天牛图志.乌鲁木齐:新疆科技卫生出版社,1993
41.骆有庆,黄竞芳,李建光.我国杨树天牛研究的主要成就、问题及展望.昆虫知识,2000,37(2):116-122
42.骆有庆.防护林杨树天牛灾害的生态调控理论与技术研究.[博士学位论文].北京:北京林业大学,2005
43.梅爱华,陈京元,吴高云,杜夕森,罗福世.江汉平原杨树害虫种类调查、发生原因及主 要害虫防治对策.森林病虫通讯,1998,(2):35-39
44.庞保平,程家安.植物体表与昆虫的关系.生态学杂志,1998,17(4):52-58
45.钦俊德,王琛柱.论昆虫与植物的相互作用和进化的关系.2001,44(3):360-365
46.钦俊德.昆虫与植物的关系.北京:科学出版社,1987:152-168
47.仇兰芳.天牛卵长尾啮小蜂生物学及寄主选择性研究.[硕士学位论文].泰安:山东农业大学,2003
48.孙金钟,赵忠懿,茹桃勤,钱振国,宋小菊.栽植苦楝隔离带和糖槭诱饵树防治光肩星天牛试验.森林病虫通讯,1990,(2):10-12
49.孙丽艳,韩一凡.对云斑天牛有不同抗性的杨树品种中化学物质的分析.林业科学,1995,31(4):338-345
50.唐启义,冯明光.实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统.北京:科学出版社,2002
51.王大洲,康月兰,张丽莉.云斑天牛一新危害寄主火炬树.河北林业科技,2000,5:25
52.王祸贵,周嘉熹,杨雪彦.混交林中黄斑星天牛选择寄主的行为与寄主抗虫性关系的研究.林业科学,2000,36(1):58-65
53.王沽,孙建云,李玉琴.七里香蔷薇精油化学成分的研究.分析测试技术与仪器,2003,9(1):34-37
54.王四宝,周弘春,苗雪霞,樊美珍,李增智,司胜利,黄勇平.松褐天牛触角感器电镜扫描和触角电位反应.应用生态学报,2005,16(02):317-322
55.王希蒙,吕文,张真.杨树对黄斑星天牛抗性的初步研究.林业科学,1987,23(1):96-99
56.王荫长主编,昆虫生物化学.北京:中国农业出版社,2001,318-319
57.王玉刚.红脂大小蠹信息素及其应用技术的研究.[硕十学位论文].北京:中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境和保护研究所,2002
58.王玉嬿,舒超然,孙永春.松褐天牛引诱试验初报.林业科学,1991,27(2):186-189
59.吴国新,刘玉卿.杨树主要蛀干害虫天牛的防治.河南林业,1999,(4):15
60.吾中良,朱建国,梁细弟,沈杰,周关校.饵木诱集松墨天牛的研究.中国森林病虫,2001,2:33-34
61.夏剑萍,戴均华,刘立德,胡兴宜.云斑天牛研究进展.湖北林业科学,2005,2:42-44
62.萧刚柔主编.中国森林昆虫.第2版(增订本).北京:中国林业出版社,1992
63.严敖金,嵇保中,钱范俊,陈京元,叶中亚.云斑天牛Batocera horsfielrdi(Hope)的研究.南京林业大学学报,1997,21(1):1-5
64.严敖金,谭青安.桉叶精油对三种天牛的忌避效果.南京林业大学学报,1998,22(1):87-90
65.严善春,程红,杨慧,袁红娥,张健,迟德富.青杨脊虎天牛对植物源挥发物的EAG和行为反应.昆虫学报,2006,49(5):759-767
66.杨洪.松褐天牛Monochamus alternatus Hope生物学特性和交配行为的研究.[博士学位论文].重庆:西南大学,2006
67.杨振德,朱麟,赵博光.昆虫化学生态与植物保护.南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2003,27(5):93-98
68.尹新明.狭胸天牛成虫下颚须和下唇须化感器研究.西南农业大学学报,1994,16(3):270-271
69.袁莹华.金龟甲对不同植物叶片的趋向反应和引诱剂的筛选.[硕士学位论文].郑州:河南农业大学,2006
70.张波,刘益宁,白杨,岛津光明.宁夏天牛病原真菌的种类和致病力研究.北京林业大学学报,1999,21(4):67-72
71.张连芹,宋世涵,黄换华.松墨天牛引诱剂的筛选和林间大面积应用.林业科技通讯,1990,41(6):15-20
72.张咏洁.萜烯类物质在油松、红脂大小蠹和天敌三重营养关系中的作用研究.[硕士学位论文].北京:北京林业大学,2007
73.张玉凤,陆群,田润民.光肩星天牛成虫对不同阔叶树选择性试验研究.内蒙古林学院学报(自然科学版),1997,19(3):17-23
74.张玉凤,陆群,张宏世,王文祥,邵铁军.光肩星天牛成虫特性及其行为的研究.内蒙古林业科技,1997,(4):7-9
75.赵锦年,林长春,姜礼元,吴沧松,姚剑飞等.M99-1引诱剂诱捕松墨天牛等松甲虫的研究.林业科学研究,2001,14(5):523-529
76.赵晓红,严善春,迟德富,等.小青×黑杨树皮中挥发油化学成分分析.东北林业大学学报,2002,30(6):18-20
77.周琳,马志卿,冯岗,张兴.天牛性信息素、引诱植物和植物性引诱剂的研究与应用.昆虫知识,2006,43(2):433-438
78.周秋菊,潘贤丽.应用生物防治技术控制天牛危害.植物保护,2004,30(1):12-16
79.诸葛飘飘,葛红梅,王满困,吴胜兵,罗森林,张国安.桑天牛头部附器感器的扫描电镜观察.昆虫知识,2009,46(2):238-243
80.Agelopoulos N G,Chamberlain K,Pickett J A.Factors effecting volatile emissions of intact potato plants,Solanum tuberosum:Variability of Quantities and Stability of Ratios.Chemical Ecology,2002,26(2):497-511
81.Allision J D,Borden J H,Seybold S J.A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera).Chemoecology,2004,14:123-150
82.Allison J D,Morewood W D,Borden J H,Hein K E,Wilson I M.Differential bio-activity of Ips and Dendroctonus(Coleoptera:Scolytidae) pheromone components for Monochamus clamator and M.scutellatus(Coleoptera:Cerambycidae).Chemical Ecology,2003,32(1):23-30
83.Altner H.Insect sensillum specificity and structure:an approach to a new typology.In:Le Magnen J,MacLeod P eds.,Olfaction and Taste Ⅳ,Information Retrieval,London,1977,6:295-303
84.Amornsak W,Cribb B,Gordh G External morphology of antennal sensilla of Trichogramma australicum Girault(Hymenoptera:Trichogrammatidae).Insect Morphol Embryol,1998,27:67-82
85.Ann L H,Richard B R.Colonization of host patches following long-distance dispersal by a goldenrod beetle,Trirhabda virgata.Ecological Entomology,1996,21:344-351
86.Badi H N,Yazdani D,Ali S M,Nazari E Effects of Spacing and Harvesting time on Herbage Yield and Quality/Quantity of Oil in Thyme,Thymus vulgaris L.Industrial Crops and Products, 2004, 19:231-236
87. Baker T C, Meyer W, Roelofs W L. Entomol Exp Appl, 1981, 30: 269-279
88. Barata E N. Mustaparta H, Pickett J A, Wadhams L J, Araujo J. Encoding of host and non-host plant odours by receptor neurones in the eucalyptus woodborer, Phoracantha semipunctata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Comp Physiol, 2002, 188: 121-133
89. Barata E N, Araujo J. Olfactory orientation responses of the eucalyptus woodborer, Phoracantha semipunctata to host plant in a wind runnel. Physiol Entomol, 2001, 26: 26-37
90. Bertschy C, Turlings T C J, Bellotti A C, Dorn S. Chemically-mediated attraction of three parasitoid species to mealybug-infested cassava leaves. Florida Entomologist, 1991, 80(3): 383-395
91. Cesar G, Walter S L, Kenji M, Coby S. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the Brownbanded Cockroach, Supella longipalpa, to stereoisomers of its sexpheromone, supellapyrone. Chemical Ecology, 2003, 29(8): 1797-1811
92. Cesar R N, Daniel R P. Host marking behavior in phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2001, 99: 273-293
93. CHI D F, Rafael O R, YAN S C, ZHANG D D, WEN Z H. Foraging behavior of parasitoid chalcid to the essential oil from bark of Populus pseudo-simonii×P.nigra and Quadraspidiotus gigas. Forestry Research, 2002, 13(4): 255-259
94. Colazza S, Mcelfresh J S, Millar J G. Identification of Volatile Synomones, Induced by Nezara viridula Feeding and Oviposition on Bean spp., that Attract the Egg Parasitoid Trissolcus basalis. Chemical Ecology, 2004, 30(5): 945-964
95. Cristofaro M, Lecce F, Campobasso G, Terragitti G, Spencer N R, Mann K D. Insect-Plant Relationships and Behavioral Observations of the Stem-Feeding Bettle Thamnurgus euphorbiae Kuster (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a New Biocontrol Agent from Italy to Control Leafy Spurge in the U.S. Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, 2000: 615-619
96. Dai H, Honda H. Sensilla on the Antennal Flagellum of the Yellow Spotted Longicorn Beetle, Psacothea hilaris (Pascoe) (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae). Appl Entomol Zool, 1990, 25: 273-282
97. Daniel R M. Limonene: Attractant Kairomone for White Pine Cone Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in an Eastern White Pine Seed Orchard in Western North Carolina. Economic Entomology, 2007, 100(3): 815-822
98. Dyer L J, Seabrook W D. Sensilla on the Antennal Flagellum of the Sawyer Beetles Monochamus notatus (Druey) and Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Morphol, 1975, 146:513-532
99. Ibeas F, Gallego D, Diez J J, Pajares J A. An operative kairomonal lure for managing pine sawyer beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerymbycidae). Appl Entomol, 2007, 131(1): 13-20
100. Faucheux M J. Distribution and abundance of antennal sensilla from two populations of the pine engraver beetle, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann Sci Nat Zool, 1994, 15: 15-31
101. Faucheux M J, Kristensen N P, Yen S H. The antennae of neopseustid moths: Morphology and phylogenetic implications, with special reference to the sensilla (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Neopseustidae). Zool Anz, 2006, 245: 131-142
102. Fettkother R, Dettner K, Schroder F. The male sex pheromone of the old house borer Hylot rupes bajulus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae): identification and female response. Experientia, 1995, 51: 270-277
103. Fettkother R, Reddy G V P, Noldt U, Dettner K. Effect of Host and Larval Frass Volatiles on Behavioural Response of the old House Borer, Hylotrupes bajulus (L.) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in a Wind Tunnel Bio-Assay. Chemoecology, 2000, 10: 1-10
104. Ginsel M D, Hanks L M. Role of host plant volatiles in mate location for three species of longhorned beetles. Chemical Ecology, 2005, 31:213-217
105. Groot P D E. Green Leaf Volatiles Inhibit Response of Red Pin Cone Beetle Conophthorus resinosae (Coleoptera: Scolylidae) to a Sex Pheromone. Naturwissenschaften, 1999, 86(2): 81-85
106. Hallberg E, Hansson B S, Steinbrecht R A. Morphological characteristics of antennal sensilla in the European cornborer Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Tissue Cell, 1994, 26: 489-502
107. Hanks L M. Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of Cerambycid beetles. Annu Rev Entomol, 1999, 44: 483-505
108. Hanks L.M., Millar J.G., Paine T.D.. Body size influences mating success of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Insect Behavior, 1996a, 9: 369-382.
109. Hanks L M, Millar J G, Paine T D. Mating behavior of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and the adaptive significance of long "horns". Insect Behavior, 1996b, 9:383-393
110. Hans M S, Joop J A van Loon, Maarten A P, Louise E M Vet. GC-EAG analysis of volatiles from Brussels sprouts plants damaged by two species of Pieris caterpillars: olfactory receptive range of a specialist and a generalist parasitoid wasp species.Chemoecology. 2002, 12: 169-176
111. Hansson B S. Insect Offaction. Splinger, Berlin, 1999: 24-37, 56
112. Hedin P A. Seasonal Variaton in the Emission of Volatiles by Cotton Plants Growing in the Field. Environmental Entomology, 1976, 5: 1234-1238
113. Hiroe Y, Tetsuya Y, Midori F, Toshiharu A, Sadao W, Yoshio H, Kenjiro K, Hiroshi O, Minoru N, Kazunari K, Takeshi F. Host plant chemicals serve intraspecific communication in the white-spotted longicorn beetle, Anoplophora malasiaca (Thomson) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Appl Entomol Zool, 2007, 42(2): 255-268
114. Huber D P W, Gries R, Borden J H, Pierce H D. Two pheromones of coniferophagous bark beetles found in the bark of nonhost angiosperms. Chemical Ecology, 1999, 25: 805-816
115. Hughes A L. Differential male mating success in the whitespotted sawyer Monochamus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am, 1981, 74: 180-184
116. Hughes A L, Hughes M K. Male size, mating success, and breeding habitat partitioning in the whitespotted sawyer, Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Oecologia, 1982,55:258-263
117. Ikeda T, Ohya E, Makihara H, Nakashima T, Saito T, Tate T, Kojima K. Olfactory responses of Anaglyptus subfasciatus PIC and Demonax transilis BATES (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) to flower scents. Jap Forestry Soc, 1993, 75(2): 108-112
118. Isidoro N., Solinas M.. Functional morphology of the antennal chemosensilla of Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Entomologica (Bari), 1992, 27, 69-84
119. Iwabuchi K, Takahashi J, Nakagava Y, Sakai T. Behavioral responses of female grape borer Xylot rechus pyrrhoderus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to synthetic male sex pheromone components. Appl Entomol Zool, 1986, 21: 21-27
120. Meijerink J, Braks M A H, Brack A A, Adam W, Dekker T, Posthumus M A, Van Beek T A, Van Loon J J A. Identification of Olfactory Stimulants for Anopheles gambiae from Human Sweat Samples. Chemical Ecology, 2000, 26 (6): 1367-1382
121. Jin Y J, Li J Q, Li J G, Luo Y Q, Stephen A T. Olfactory response of Anoplophora glabripennis to Volatile Compounds from Ash leaf Maple (Acer negundo) Under Drought Stress. 2004, Scientla Silvae Sinicae, 2004, 40(1): 99-105
122. Kaissling K E. Chemo-electrical transduction in insect olfactory receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci, 1986,9: 121-145
123. Kim J L, Yamasaki T. Sensilla of Carabus (Isiocarabus) fiduciarius saishutoicus Csiki (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Insect Morphol Embryol, 1996, 25: 153-172
124. Kobayashi F, Yamane A, Ikeda T. The Japanese Pine Sawyer Beetles as the Vector of Pine Wilt Disease. Ann Rev Entomol, 1984, 29: 115-135
125. krieger J, Breer H. Science, 1999, 286: 720-723
126. CHUNG K H, MOON M J. Fine structure of the antennal sensilla of the millipede Orthomorphella pekuensis (Polydesmida:Paradoxosomatidae). Entomological Research, 2006, 36: 172-178
127. Larsson M C, Leal W S, Hansson B S. Olfactory receptorneurons detecting plant odours and male volatiles in Anomala cuprea beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Insect Physiology, 2001, 47: 1065-1076
128. Lawrence J F. Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. USA, New York: McGraw Hill Coleoptera, 1982, 2: 482-553
129. Leather S R, Watt A D, Forrest G I. Insect-induced chemical in young Lodgepole Pine (Pine conzorta): the effect of defoliation on oviposition, growth and survival of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea. Ecological Entomology, 1987, 12: 275-281
130. Li J G, Jin Y J, Luo Y Q, Xu Z C, Chen H J. Leaf Volatiles from host tree Acer negundo: Diuranl Rhythm and Behavior Responses of Anoplophora glabripennis to Volatiles in Field. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2003, 45(2): 177-182
131. Linsley E G. Ecology of Cerambycidae. Annu Rev Entomol., 1959, 4: 99-138
132. Lopes O, Barata E N, Mustaparta H, Araujo J. Fine structure of antennal sensilla basiconica and their detection of plant volatiles in the eucalyptus woodborer. Phoracantha semipunctata Fabricius (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Arthropod Struct., 2002, 31: 1-13
133. Lu Y J, Zhang X X. Effect of in fochemicals on insect behavior. Entomological Knowledge, 2001, 38(4): 262-266
134. Matthew D G, Lawrence M H. Role of Host Plant Volatiles in Mate Location for Three Species of Longhorned Beetles. Chemical Ecology, 2005, 31(1): 213-217
135. Merivee R E M, Bresciani J, Ravn H P, Luik A. Antennal Sensilla of the Click Beetle, Limonius aeruginosus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Insect Morphol and Embryol, 1998, 27(4): 311-318
136. Merivee R E M, Luik A. Antennal Sensilla of the Click Beetle, Melanotus villosus (Geoffroy) (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Insect Morphology, 1999, 28: 41-51
137. Morewood W D, Simmondas K E, Gries R, Allison J D. Borden Disruption by Conophthorin of the Kairomonal Response of Sawyer Beetles to Bark Beetle Pheromones. Chemical Ecology. 2003,29:2115-2129
138. Nakamuta K, Leal W S, Nakashima T, Tokoro M, Ono M, Nakanishi M. Increase of trap catches by a combination of male sex pheromones and floral attractant in longhorn beetle, Anaglyptus subfasciatus. Chemical Ecology, 1997, 23: 1635-1640
139. Ochieng S A, Park K C, Zhu J W, Baker T C. Functional morphology of antennae chemoreceptors of the parasitoid Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Arthropod Struct., 2000, 29: 231-240
140. Onagbola E O. Scanning electron microscopy studies of antennal sensilla of Pteromalus cerealellae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Micron, 2008, 39: 526-535
141. Peter F R, Matthew D G, Lawrence M H. Aggregation and mate location in the red milkweed beetle (Coleoptera Cerambycidae). Insect Behavior, 2002, 15(6): 811-830
142. Peter J L, Thomas W P. Host Plant Influences On Sex Pheromone Behavior of Phytophagous Insects. Annu Rev Entomol, 1997, 42: 371-393
143. Phillips T W, Wilkening A J, Atkinson T H, Nation J L, Wilkinson R C, Foltz J L. Synergism of turpentine and ethanol as attractants for certain pine-infesting beetles (Coleoptera). Environmental Entomology, 1988, 17(3): 456-462
144. Roelofs W L. Pheromones and their chemistry. In: Locke M, Smith D S eds., Insect Biology in the Future. NewYork: Ac-ademic Press, 1980, 583-602
145. Roux O, van Baaren J, Gers C, Arvanitakis L, Legal L. Antennal structure and ovipostion behavior of the Plutella xylostella specialist parasitoid Cotesia plutellae. Micro Res Technol, 2005, 68, 36-44
146. Said I, Tauban D, Renou M, Mori K, Rochat D. Structure and function of the antennal sensilla of the palm weevil Rhynchophorus palmarum (Coleoptera. Curculionidae). Insect Physiol, 2003, 49: 857-872
147. Schneider D. Insect antennae. Annu Rev Entomol, 1964, 9: 103-122
148. Schneider D. Science, 1969, 163: 1031-1037
149. Schneider D. Vergl Physiol, 1957,40: 8-41
150. Schneider D. In: Olfaction and Taste, I. Zotterman Y ed., Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1963
151. Smid H M, Van Loon J J A, Posthumus M A, Vet LEM. GC-EAG analysis of Volatiles from Brussels Sprouts Plants Damaged by two species of Pieris caterpillars: Olfactory Receptive Rang of a Specialist and a Generalist Parasitoid Wasp Species. Chemoecology, 2002, 12: 169-179
152. Souissi R, Nenon J P, LeRu B. Olfactory Responses of Parasitoid Apoanagyrus lopezi to Oder of Plants, Mealybugs, and Plant-mealybug Complexes. Chemical Ecology, 1998, 24(1): 37-48
153. Southwood T R E, Van Emden H F. Insect/Plant Relationship, Wiley, New York, 1978, 3-30
154. Suckling D M, Gibb A R, Daly J M, Chen X, Brockerhoff E G. Behavioral and Electrophysiological Responses of Arhopalus tristis to Burnt Pine and other Stimuli. Chemical Ecology, 2001,27(6): 1091-1104
155. Imai T, Maekawa M, Tsuchiya S, Fujimori T. Field attraction of Hoplia communis to 2-Phenylethanol, a majior volatile component from host flowers, Rosa spp. Chemical Ecology, 1998,24(9): 1491-1497
156. Torsten M, Monika H. Host location in Oomyzus gallerucae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), an egg parasitoid of the elm leaf beetle Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Oecologia., 1997, 112:87-93
157. Walsh K D, Linit M J. Oviposition biology of the pine sawyer, Monochamus carolinensis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am, 1985, 78: 81-85
158. Werner R A. Toxicity and repellency of 4-allylanisole and Monoterpenes from White Spruce and Tamarack to the Spruce Beetle and Eastern Larch Beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology, 1995, 24: 372-379
159. Wittko F, Konrad D. Chemical Signalling in Beetles. Topics in Current Chemistry, 2005, 240: 85-166
160. Yamasaki T, Sato M, Sakoguchi H. (-)2germacrene D: Masking substance of attractants for the cerambycid beetle, Monochamus alternatus (Hope). Appl Entomol Zool, 1997, 32(3): 423-429
161. Zacharuk R Y. Antennae and sensilla. In: Kerkut G A, Gilber L I eds., Comparative Insect phsiol., Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1985, 6: 1-69
162. Zeringue H J. Changes in cotton leaf chemistry induced by volatile elicitors. Phycochem, 1987, 26: 1357-1360
163. Zhang Q H, Birgersson G, Zhu J W, Lofstedt C, Lofqvist J, Schlyter F. Leaf volatiles from nonhost deciduous trees: variation by tree species, season and temperature and electrophysiological activity in Ips typographus. Chemical Ecology, 1999, 25: 1923-1943
164. Zhang X, Linit M J. Comparison of oviposition and longevity of Monochamus alternatus and M. carolinensis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) under laboratory conditions. Environmental Entomology, 1998, 27: 885-891
2.程红.青杨脊虎天牛触角感器类型及其对植物挥发物的反应.[硕士学位论文].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2006
3.程立超,迟德福.10种杨属植物树皮挥发油的化学成分分析.林业科学研究.2007,20(2):267-271
4.戴晓枫,丁红建.寄主植物挥发性它感化合物与害虫行为的关系.植物保护,2003,5:33-35.
5.丁铋,黄金水,黄海清.星天牛成虫行为及其机制的初步研究.林业科学研究,1995,8:53-57
6.杜家纬.植物-昆虫间的化学通讯及其行为控制.植物生理学报,2001,27(3):193-200
7.杜永均,严福顺.植物挥发性次生物质在植食性昆虫、寄主植物和昆虫天敌关系中的作用机理.昆虫学报,1994,37(2):233-250
8.樊慧,金幼菊,李继泉,陈华君.引诱植食性昆虫的植物挥发性信息化合物的研究进展.北京林业大学学报,2004,26(3):76-81
9.高瑞桐,王宏乾,徐邦新,郑世锴,王希群,龚益鸿.云斑天牛补充营养习性及与寄主树关系的研究.林业科学研究,1995,8(6):619-623
10.高瑞桐,郑世锴.利用成虫取食习性防治3种杨树天牛.北京林业大学学报,1998,20(1):43-48
11.郭丽.桑树对桑天牛引诱机制的研究.[硕士学位论文].保定:河北农业大学,2006
12.郭线茹,原国辉,蒋金炜,罗梅浩,马继盛.不同季节黑杨萎蔫叶片挥发物的化学成分分析.应用生态学报,2005,16(10):1822-1825
13.韩颖,张青文,路大光.松褐天牛触角感器的扫描电镜观察.昆虫知识,2005,(6):681-685
14.郝德君,马凤林,王焱,张永慧,戴华国.松墨天牛对不同生理状态黑松挥发物的触角生理和行为反应.应用生态学报,2006,17(6):1070-1074
15.贺萍,黄竞芳.光肩星天牛成虫的行为.昆虫学报,1993,36(1):51-55
16.洪健,高其康,徐正,徐颖.扫描电镜在昆虫学研究中的应用.电子显微学报,2001,20(4):489-490
17.胡江,李义龙,刘剑虹,郑润兰,陈树琼,杨富.麻点豹天牛成虫感器的扫描电镜研究.电子显微学报,2001,(4):499-500
18.黄金水,何学友,叶剑雄,黄衍庆,高美玲.苦楝引诱防治星天牛研究.林业科学,2001,37(4):58-64
19.嵇保中,钱范俊,严敖金.云斑天牛研究方法的改进.森林病虫通讯,1996,(1):45-46
20.嵇保中,魏勇,黄振裕.天牛成虫行为研究的现状与展望.南京林业大学学报,2002,26(2):79-83
21.嵇保中,钱范俊.云斑天牛生殖系统的研究.南京林业大学学报,1995,19(4):14-20
22.江望锦,嵇保中,刘曙雯,宋杰.天牛成虫信息素及嗅觉感受机制研究进展.昆虫学报, 2005,48(3):427-436
23.江望锦.松墨天牛成虫与寄主间化学信息联系机制的初步研究.[硕士学位论文].南京:南京林业大学,2005
24.蒋丽雅,朋金和,周健生,吕传海,卜厚平,苏元功.松褐天牛引诱剂Mat-1号的研究.森林病虫通讯,1997,3:5-7
25.蒋书楠,蒲富基,华立中.中国经济昆虫志第三十五册鞘翅目天牛科(三).北京:科学出版社,1985
26.巨云为,赵博光,成量,王维华,高世望.印楝提取物对云斑天牛成虫选择取食的影响.南京林业大学学报,2003,(5):85-87
27.李德家,刘益宁.光肩星天牛成虫性发育同日龄、补充营养以及交配之间的关系.西北林学院学报,1997,12(4):19-23
28.李德家,所雅彦,中岛忠一.光肩星天牛成虫交配行为机制研究.北京林业大学学报,1999,21(4):33-36
29.李建光.光肩星天牛对寄主植物挥发性物质的行为反应及作用机理的研究.[博士学位论文].北京:北京林业大学,2001
30.李娟,王满困,张志春等.云斑天牛成虫对植物气味的行为反应.林业科学,2008,44(6):165-170
31.李水清,张钟宁.马尾松枝条挥发性组分的鉴定及松墨天牛对其触角电生理反应.昆虫知识,2007,44(3):385-389
32.李文杰,邬承先.杨树天牛综合管理.北京:中国林业出版社,1993
33.李新岗,张克斌.黄斑星天牛成虫下颚须和下唇须的化学感受器.昆虫知识,1991,(6):357-358
34.刘芳,娄永根,程家安.虫害诱导的植物挥发物:植物与植事性昆虫及其天敌相互作用的进化产物.昆虫知识,2003,40(6):481-486
35.刘玉双,石福明.红缘吉丁(鞘翅目:吉丁虫科)触角感器的扫描电镜观察.昆虫学报,2005,58(3):469-472
36.娄永根,程家安.虫害诱导的植物挥发物的基本特性、生态学功能及释放机制.生态学报,2000,20(6):10972-21106
37.卢绍辉.黑杨Populus nigra L.气味物质诱集鳞翅目成虫生物学机理的研究.[硕士学位论文].郑州:河南农业大学,2002
38.鲁玉杰,张孝羲.信息化合物对昆虫行为的影响.昆虫知识,2001,38(4):262-266
39.陆群,张玉凤.光肩星天牛成虫头部附器超微结构的研究分析.内蒙古林业科技,2002,(01):16-19
40.陆水田,康建新,马新华.新疆天牛图志.乌鲁木齐:新疆科技卫生出版社,1993
41.骆有庆,黄竞芳,李建光.我国杨树天牛研究的主要成就、问题及展望.昆虫知识,2000,37(2):116-122
42.骆有庆.防护林杨树天牛灾害的生态调控理论与技术研究.[博士学位论文].北京:北京林业大学,2005
43.梅爱华,陈京元,吴高云,杜夕森,罗福世.江汉平原杨树害虫种类调查、发生原因及主 要害虫防治对策.森林病虫通讯,1998,(2):35-39
44.庞保平,程家安.植物体表与昆虫的关系.生态学杂志,1998,17(4):52-58
45.钦俊德,王琛柱.论昆虫与植物的相互作用和进化的关系.2001,44(3):360-365
46.钦俊德.昆虫与植物的关系.北京:科学出版社,1987:152-168
47.仇兰芳.天牛卵长尾啮小蜂生物学及寄主选择性研究.[硕士学位论文].泰安:山东农业大学,2003
48.孙金钟,赵忠懿,茹桃勤,钱振国,宋小菊.栽植苦楝隔离带和糖槭诱饵树防治光肩星天牛试验.森林病虫通讯,1990,(2):10-12
49.孙丽艳,韩一凡.对云斑天牛有不同抗性的杨树品种中化学物质的分析.林业科学,1995,31(4):338-345
50.唐启义,冯明光.实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统.北京:科学出版社,2002
51.王大洲,康月兰,张丽莉.云斑天牛一新危害寄主火炬树.河北林业科技,2000,5:25
52.王祸贵,周嘉熹,杨雪彦.混交林中黄斑星天牛选择寄主的行为与寄主抗虫性关系的研究.林业科学,2000,36(1):58-65
53.王沽,孙建云,李玉琴.七里香蔷薇精油化学成分的研究.分析测试技术与仪器,2003,9(1):34-37
54.王四宝,周弘春,苗雪霞,樊美珍,李增智,司胜利,黄勇平.松褐天牛触角感器电镜扫描和触角电位反应.应用生态学报,2005,16(02):317-322
55.王希蒙,吕文,张真.杨树对黄斑星天牛抗性的初步研究.林业科学,1987,23(1):96-99
56.王荫长主编,昆虫生物化学.北京:中国农业出版社,2001,318-319
57.王玉刚.红脂大小蠹信息素及其应用技术的研究.[硕十学位论文].北京:中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境和保护研究所,2002
58.王玉嬿,舒超然,孙永春.松褐天牛引诱试验初报.林业科学,1991,27(2):186-189
59.吴国新,刘玉卿.杨树主要蛀干害虫天牛的防治.河南林业,1999,(4):15
60.吾中良,朱建国,梁细弟,沈杰,周关校.饵木诱集松墨天牛的研究.中国森林病虫,2001,2:33-34
61.夏剑萍,戴均华,刘立德,胡兴宜.云斑天牛研究进展.湖北林业科学,2005,2:42-44
62.萧刚柔主编.中国森林昆虫.第2版(增订本).北京:中国林业出版社,1992
63.严敖金,嵇保中,钱范俊,陈京元,叶中亚.云斑天牛Batocera horsfielrdi(Hope)的研究.南京林业大学学报,1997,21(1):1-5
64.严敖金,谭青安.桉叶精油对三种天牛的忌避效果.南京林业大学学报,1998,22(1):87-90
65.严善春,程红,杨慧,袁红娥,张健,迟德富.青杨脊虎天牛对植物源挥发物的EAG和行为反应.昆虫学报,2006,49(5):759-767
66.杨洪.松褐天牛Monochamus alternatus Hope生物学特性和交配行为的研究.[博士学位论文].重庆:西南大学,2006
67.杨振德,朱麟,赵博光.昆虫化学生态与植物保护.南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2003,27(5):93-98
68.尹新明.狭胸天牛成虫下颚须和下唇须化感器研究.西南农业大学学报,1994,16(3):270-271
69.袁莹华.金龟甲对不同植物叶片的趋向反应和引诱剂的筛选.[硕士学位论文].郑州:河南农业大学,2006
70.张波,刘益宁,白杨,岛津光明.宁夏天牛病原真菌的种类和致病力研究.北京林业大学学报,1999,21(4):67-72
71.张连芹,宋世涵,黄换华.松墨天牛引诱剂的筛选和林间大面积应用.林业科技通讯,1990,41(6):15-20
72.张咏洁.萜烯类物质在油松、红脂大小蠹和天敌三重营养关系中的作用研究.[硕士学位论文].北京:北京林业大学,2007
73.张玉凤,陆群,田润民.光肩星天牛成虫对不同阔叶树选择性试验研究.内蒙古林学院学报(自然科学版),1997,19(3):17-23
74.张玉凤,陆群,张宏世,王文祥,邵铁军.光肩星天牛成虫特性及其行为的研究.内蒙古林业科技,1997,(4):7-9
75.赵锦年,林长春,姜礼元,吴沧松,姚剑飞等.M99-1引诱剂诱捕松墨天牛等松甲虫的研究.林业科学研究,2001,14(5):523-529
76.赵晓红,严善春,迟德富,等.小青×黑杨树皮中挥发油化学成分分析.东北林业大学学报,2002,30(6):18-20
77.周琳,马志卿,冯岗,张兴.天牛性信息素、引诱植物和植物性引诱剂的研究与应用.昆虫知识,2006,43(2):433-438
78.周秋菊,潘贤丽.应用生物防治技术控制天牛危害.植物保护,2004,30(1):12-16
79.诸葛飘飘,葛红梅,王满困,吴胜兵,罗森林,张国安.桑天牛头部附器感器的扫描电镜观察.昆虫知识,2009,46(2):238-243
80.Agelopoulos N G,Chamberlain K,Pickett J A.Factors effecting volatile emissions of intact potato plants,Solanum tuberosum:Variability of Quantities and Stability of Ratios.Chemical Ecology,2002,26(2):497-511
81.Allision J D,Borden J H,Seybold S J.A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera).Chemoecology,2004,14:123-150
82.Allison J D,Morewood W D,Borden J H,Hein K E,Wilson I M.Differential bio-activity of Ips and Dendroctonus(Coleoptera:Scolytidae) pheromone components for Monochamus clamator and M.scutellatus(Coleoptera:Cerambycidae).Chemical Ecology,2003,32(1):23-30
83.Altner H.Insect sensillum specificity and structure:an approach to a new typology.In:Le Magnen J,MacLeod P eds.,Olfaction and Taste Ⅳ,Information Retrieval,London,1977,6:295-303
84.Amornsak W,Cribb B,Gordh G External morphology of antennal sensilla of Trichogramma australicum Girault(Hymenoptera:Trichogrammatidae).Insect Morphol Embryol,1998,27:67-82
85.Ann L H,Richard B R.Colonization of host patches following long-distance dispersal by a goldenrod beetle,Trirhabda virgata.Ecological Entomology,1996,21:344-351
86.Badi H N,Yazdani D,Ali S M,Nazari E Effects of Spacing and Harvesting time on Herbage Yield and Quality/Quantity of Oil in Thyme,Thymus vulgaris L.Industrial Crops and Products, 2004, 19:231-236
87. Baker T C, Meyer W, Roelofs W L. Entomol Exp Appl, 1981, 30: 269-279
88. Barata E N. Mustaparta H, Pickett J A, Wadhams L J, Araujo J. Encoding of host and non-host plant odours by receptor neurones in the eucalyptus woodborer, Phoracantha semipunctata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Comp Physiol, 2002, 188: 121-133
89. Barata E N, Araujo J. Olfactory orientation responses of the eucalyptus woodborer, Phoracantha semipunctata to host plant in a wind runnel. Physiol Entomol, 2001, 26: 26-37
90. Bertschy C, Turlings T C J, Bellotti A C, Dorn S. Chemically-mediated attraction of three parasitoid species to mealybug-infested cassava leaves. Florida Entomologist, 1991, 80(3): 383-395
91. Cesar G, Walter S L, Kenji M, Coby S. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the Brownbanded Cockroach, Supella longipalpa, to stereoisomers of its sexpheromone, supellapyrone. Chemical Ecology, 2003, 29(8): 1797-1811
92. Cesar R N, Daniel R P. Host marking behavior in phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2001, 99: 273-293
93. CHI D F, Rafael O R, YAN S C, ZHANG D D, WEN Z H. Foraging behavior of parasitoid chalcid to the essential oil from bark of Populus pseudo-simonii×P.nigra and Quadraspidiotus gigas. Forestry Research, 2002, 13(4): 255-259
94. Colazza S, Mcelfresh J S, Millar J G. Identification of Volatile Synomones, Induced by Nezara viridula Feeding and Oviposition on Bean spp., that Attract the Egg Parasitoid Trissolcus basalis. Chemical Ecology, 2004, 30(5): 945-964
95. Cristofaro M, Lecce F, Campobasso G, Terragitti G, Spencer N R, Mann K D. Insect-Plant Relationships and Behavioral Observations of the Stem-Feeding Bettle Thamnurgus euphorbiae Kuster (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a New Biocontrol Agent from Italy to Control Leafy Spurge in the U.S. Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, 2000: 615-619
96. Dai H, Honda H. Sensilla on the Antennal Flagellum of the Yellow Spotted Longicorn Beetle, Psacothea hilaris (Pascoe) (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae). Appl Entomol Zool, 1990, 25: 273-282
97. Daniel R M. Limonene: Attractant Kairomone for White Pine Cone Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in an Eastern White Pine Seed Orchard in Western North Carolina. Economic Entomology, 2007, 100(3): 815-822
98. Dyer L J, Seabrook W D. Sensilla on the Antennal Flagellum of the Sawyer Beetles Monochamus notatus (Druey) and Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Morphol, 1975, 146:513-532
99. Ibeas F, Gallego D, Diez J J, Pajares J A. An operative kairomonal lure for managing pine sawyer beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerymbycidae). Appl Entomol, 2007, 131(1): 13-20
100. Faucheux M J. Distribution and abundance of antennal sensilla from two populations of the pine engraver beetle, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann Sci Nat Zool, 1994, 15: 15-31
101. Faucheux M J, Kristensen N P, Yen S H. The antennae of neopseustid moths: Morphology and phylogenetic implications, with special reference to the sensilla (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Neopseustidae). Zool Anz, 2006, 245: 131-142
102. Fettkother R, Dettner K, Schroder F. The male sex pheromone of the old house borer Hylot rupes bajulus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae): identification and female response. Experientia, 1995, 51: 270-277
103. Fettkother R, Reddy G V P, Noldt U, Dettner K. Effect of Host and Larval Frass Volatiles on Behavioural Response of the old House Borer, Hylotrupes bajulus (L.) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in a Wind Tunnel Bio-Assay. Chemoecology, 2000, 10: 1-10
104. Ginsel M D, Hanks L M. Role of host plant volatiles in mate location for three species of longhorned beetles. Chemical Ecology, 2005, 31:213-217
105. Groot P D E. Green Leaf Volatiles Inhibit Response of Red Pin Cone Beetle Conophthorus resinosae (Coleoptera: Scolylidae) to a Sex Pheromone. Naturwissenschaften, 1999, 86(2): 81-85
106. Hallberg E, Hansson B S, Steinbrecht R A. Morphological characteristics of antennal sensilla in the European cornborer Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Tissue Cell, 1994, 26: 489-502
107. Hanks L M. Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of Cerambycid beetles. Annu Rev Entomol, 1999, 44: 483-505
108. Hanks L.M., Millar J.G., Paine T.D.. Body size influences mating success of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Insect Behavior, 1996a, 9: 369-382.
109. Hanks L M, Millar J G, Paine T D. Mating behavior of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and the adaptive significance of long "horns". Insect Behavior, 1996b, 9:383-393
110. Hans M S, Joop J A van Loon, Maarten A P, Louise E M Vet. GC-EAG analysis of volatiles from Brussels sprouts plants damaged by two species of Pieris caterpillars: olfactory receptive range of a specialist and a generalist parasitoid wasp species.Chemoecology. 2002, 12: 169-176
111. Hansson B S. Insect Offaction. Splinger, Berlin, 1999: 24-37, 56
112. Hedin P A. Seasonal Variaton in the Emission of Volatiles by Cotton Plants Growing in the Field. Environmental Entomology, 1976, 5: 1234-1238
113. Hiroe Y, Tetsuya Y, Midori F, Toshiharu A, Sadao W, Yoshio H, Kenjiro K, Hiroshi O, Minoru N, Kazunari K, Takeshi F. Host plant chemicals serve intraspecific communication in the white-spotted longicorn beetle, Anoplophora malasiaca (Thomson) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Appl Entomol Zool, 2007, 42(2): 255-268
114. Huber D P W, Gries R, Borden J H, Pierce H D. Two pheromones of coniferophagous bark beetles found in the bark of nonhost angiosperms. Chemical Ecology, 1999, 25: 805-816
115. Hughes A L. Differential male mating success in the whitespotted sawyer Monochamus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am, 1981, 74: 180-184
116. Hughes A L, Hughes M K. Male size, mating success, and breeding habitat partitioning in the whitespotted sawyer, Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Oecologia, 1982,55:258-263
117. Ikeda T, Ohya E, Makihara H, Nakashima T, Saito T, Tate T, Kojima K. Olfactory responses of Anaglyptus subfasciatus PIC and Demonax transilis BATES (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) to flower scents. Jap Forestry Soc, 1993, 75(2): 108-112
118. Isidoro N., Solinas M.. Functional morphology of the antennal chemosensilla of Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Entomologica (Bari), 1992, 27, 69-84
119. Iwabuchi K, Takahashi J, Nakagava Y, Sakai T. Behavioral responses of female grape borer Xylot rechus pyrrhoderus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to synthetic male sex pheromone components. Appl Entomol Zool, 1986, 21: 21-27
120. Meijerink J, Braks M A H, Brack A A, Adam W, Dekker T, Posthumus M A, Van Beek T A, Van Loon J J A. Identification of Olfactory Stimulants for Anopheles gambiae from Human Sweat Samples. Chemical Ecology, 2000, 26 (6): 1367-1382
121. Jin Y J, Li J Q, Li J G, Luo Y Q, Stephen A T. Olfactory response of Anoplophora glabripennis to Volatile Compounds from Ash leaf Maple (Acer negundo) Under Drought Stress. 2004, Scientla Silvae Sinicae, 2004, 40(1): 99-105
122. Kaissling K E. Chemo-electrical transduction in insect olfactory receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci, 1986,9: 121-145
123. Kim J L, Yamasaki T. Sensilla of Carabus (Isiocarabus) fiduciarius saishutoicus Csiki (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Insect Morphol Embryol, 1996, 25: 153-172
124. Kobayashi F, Yamane A, Ikeda T. The Japanese Pine Sawyer Beetles as the Vector of Pine Wilt Disease. Ann Rev Entomol, 1984, 29: 115-135
125. krieger J, Breer H. Science, 1999, 286: 720-723
126. CHUNG K H, MOON M J. Fine structure of the antennal sensilla of the millipede Orthomorphella pekuensis (Polydesmida:Paradoxosomatidae). Entomological Research, 2006, 36: 172-178
127. Larsson M C, Leal W S, Hansson B S. Olfactory receptorneurons detecting plant odours and male volatiles in Anomala cuprea beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Insect Physiology, 2001, 47: 1065-1076
128. Lawrence J F. Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. USA, New York: McGraw Hill Coleoptera, 1982, 2: 482-553
129. Leather S R, Watt A D, Forrest G I. Insect-induced chemical in young Lodgepole Pine (Pine conzorta): the effect of defoliation on oviposition, growth and survival of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea. Ecological Entomology, 1987, 12: 275-281
130. Li J G, Jin Y J, Luo Y Q, Xu Z C, Chen H J. Leaf Volatiles from host tree Acer negundo: Diuranl Rhythm and Behavior Responses of Anoplophora glabripennis to Volatiles in Field. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2003, 45(2): 177-182
131. Linsley E G. Ecology of Cerambycidae. Annu Rev Entomol., 1959, 4: 99-138
132. Lopes O, Barata E N, Mustaparta H, Araujo J. Fine structure of antennal sensilla basiconica and their detection of plant volatiles in the eucalyptus woodborer. Phoracantha semipunctata Fabricius (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Arthropod Struct., 2002, 31: 1-13
133. Lu Y J, Zhang X X. Effect of in fochemicals on insect behavior. Entomological Knowledge, 2001, 38(4): 262-266
134. Matthew D G, Lawrence M H. Role of Host Plant Volatiles in Mate Location for Three Species of Longhorned Beetles. Chemical Ecology, 2005, 31(1): 213-217
135. Merivee R E M, Bresciani J, Ravn H P, Luik A. Antennal Sensilla of the Click Beetle, Limonius aeruginosus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Insect Morphol and Embryol, 1998, 27(4): 311-318
136. Merivee R E M, Luik A. Antennal Sensilla of the Click Beetle, Melanotus villosus (Geoffroy) (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Insect Morphology, 1999, 28: 41-51
137. Morewood W D, Simmondas K E, Gries R, Allison J D. Borden Disruption by Conophthorin of the Kairomonal Response of Sawyer Beetles to Bark Beetle Pheromones. Chemical Ecology. 2003,29:2115-2129
138. Nakamuta K, Leal W S, Nakashima T, Tokoro M, Ono M, Nakanishi M. Increase of trap catches by a combination of male sex pheromones and floral attractant in longhorn beetle, Anaglyptus subfasciatus. Chemical Ecology, 1997, 23: 1635-1640
139. Ochieng S A, Park K C, Zhu J W, Baker T C. Functional morphology of antennae chemoreceptors of the parasitoid Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Arthropod Struct., 2000, 29: 231-240
140. Onagbola E O. Scanning electron microscopy studies of antennal sensilla of Pteromalus cerealellae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Micron, 2008, 39: 526-535
141. Peter F R, Matthew D G, Lawrence M H. Aggregation and mate location in the red milkweed beetle (Coleoptera Cerambycidae). Insect Behavior, 2002, 15(6): 811-830
142. Peter J L, Thomas W P. Host Plant Influences On Sex Pheromone Behavior of Phytophagous Insects. Annu Rev Entomol, 1997, 42: 371-393
143. Phillips T W, Wilkening A J, Atkinson T H, Nation J L, Wilkinson R C, Foltz J L. Synergism of turpentine and ethanol as attractants for certain pine-infesting beetles (Coleoptera). Environmental Entomology, 1988, 17(3): 456-462
144. Roelofs W L. Pheromones and their chemistry. In: Locke M, Smith D S eds., Insect Biology in the Future. NewYork: Ac-ademic Press, 1980, 583-602
145. Roux O, van Baaren J, Gers C, Arvanitakis L, Legal L. Antennal structure and ovipostion behavior of the Plutella xylostella specialist parasitoid Cotesia plutellae. Micro Res Technol, 2005, 68, 36-44
146. Said I, Tauban D, Renou M, Mori K, Rochat D. Structure and function of the antennal sensilla of the palm weevil Rhynchophorus palmarum (Coleoptera. Curculionidae). Insect Physiol, 2003, 49: 857-872
147. Schneider D. Insect antennae. Annu Rev Entomol, 1964, 9: 103-122
148. Schneider D. Science, 1969, 163: 1031-1037
149. Schneider D. Vergl Physiol, 1957,40: 8-41
150. Schneider D. In: Olfaction and Taste, I. Zotterman Y ed., Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1963
151. Smid H M, Van Loon J J A, Posthumus M A, Vet LEM. GC-EAG analysis of Volatiles from Brussels Sprouts Plants Damaged by two species of Pieris caterpillars: Olfactory Receptive Rang of a Specialist and a Generalist Parasitoid Wasp Species. Chemoecology, 2002, 12: 169-179
152. Souissi R, Nenon J P, LeRu B. Olfactory Responses of Parasitoid Apoanagyrus lopezi to Oder of Plants, Mealybugs, and Plant-mealybug Complexes. Chemical Ecology, 1998, 24(1): 37-48
153. Southwood T R E, Van Emden H F. Insect/Plant Relationship, Wiley, New York, 1978, 3-30
154. Suckling D M, Gibb A R, Daly J M, Chen X, Brockerhoff E G. Behavioral and Electrophysiological Responses of Arhopalus tristis to Burnt Pine and other Stimuli. Chemical Ecology, 2001,27(6): 1091-1104
155. Imai T, Maekawa M, Tsuchiya S, Fujimori T. Field attraction of Hoplia communis to 2-Phenylethanol, a majior volatile component from host flowers, Rosa spp. Chemical Ecology, 1998,24(9): 1491-1497
156. Torsten M, Monika H. Host location in Oomyzus gallerucae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), an egg parasitoid of the elm leaf beetle Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Oecologia., 1997, 112:87-93
157. Walsh K D, Linit M J. Oviposition biology of the pine sawyer, Monochamus carolinensis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am, 1985, 78: 81-85
158. Werner R A. Toxicity and repellency of 4-allylanisole and Monoterpenes from White Spruce and Tamarack to the Spruce Beetle and Eastern Larch Beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology, 1995, 24: 372-379
159. Wittko F, Konrad D. Chemical Signalling in Beetles. Topics in Current Chemistry, 2005, 240: 85-166
160. Yamasaki T, Sato M, Sakoguchi H. (-)2germacrene D: Masking substance of attractants for the cerambycid beetle, Monochamus alternatus (Hope). Appl Entomol Zool, 1997, 32(3): 423-429
161. Zacharuk R Y. Antennae and sensilla. In: Kerkut G A, Gilber L I eds., Comparative Insect phsiol., Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1985, 6: 1-69
162. Zeringue H J. Changes in cotton leaf chemistry induced by volatile elicitors. Phycochem, 1987, 26: 1357-1360
163. Zhang Q H, Birgersson G, Zhu J W, Lofstedt C, Lofqvist J, Schlyter F. Leaf volatiles from nonhost deciduous trees: variation by tree species, season and temperature and electrophysiological activity in Ips typographus. Chemical Ecology, 1999, 25: 1923-1943
164. Zhang X, Linit M J. Comparison of oviposition and longevity of Monochamus alternatus and M. carolinensis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) under laboratory conditions. Environmental Entomology, 1998, 27: 885-891