汉语事体结构
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本篇论文是对汉语单语素动词(mono-morphemic verbs)词汇体(lexical aspect)的研究。人们普遍认为,语言中词汇体有四种:状态体(state),行为体(activity),完成体(achievement),和完结体(accomplishment)。在英语中,上述四种体都是在词库中表达的。但在汉语中,情况有所不同:由于汉语中的单语素动词没有结点(telicity),因此只有状态体和行为体是在词库中表达的。那么,汉语中的完成体和完结体是如何表达的呢?这是本篇论文所关注的,也是本研究的意义所在。
     我们的研究从探讨汉语如何表达状态体和行为体开始。状态体和行为体分别具有[-stages,-telic]和[+stages,-telic]的特征。由于汉语中单语素动词也具有[-telic]的特征,因此这两种体是在汉语词库中直接表达的。同时,我们探讨了状态体和行为体的事件结构(event structure),或称词汇关系结构(Lexical Relational Structures)(Hale andKeyser 1991,1993)。
     然后,我们开始探讨汉语如何表达完成体。研究发现:汉语中的完成体是通过句法手段表达的,即:在状态动词和行为动词的基础上加上一个体标记词(了,着,到,等。),如:红了,见到,表示事件的终点(endpoint)。体标记词的功能相当于事件谓词BECOME,表示状态变化(inchoative change of state)。我们还讨论了体标记词的共存现象。每个体标记词相当于一个标界词(delimiter),表示事件的终结。因此,每个事件只能允许出现一个体标记词作为标界,我们称其为“一个事件一个标界词原则”(One Delimiter Per-Event Principle)。这个原则解释了为什么多个体标记词不能在同一个事件中共存。
     最后,本篇论文探讨了汉语如何表达完结体。我们发现,汉语表达完结体有两种方式:第一种方式是在行为动词上加一个表达结果的体标记词(了,着,到,等。),如:抓到,吃了,表示事件的结果。这类行为动词必须是可持续性动词,具有[+stages]特征。表达完结体的另一种途径是动结结构(Resultative Verbal Constructions)。动结结构是复杂事件结构,其中一个事件表示动作(activity),另一个事件表示结果(result)。根据语段理论(phase theory)(Chomsky 2000),我们认为动结结构是一个νP-壳(νP-shell)结构,也就是说:动结结构是由两个νP嵌套在一起,它们是两个独立的语段,在概念结构上蕴涵着致使关系(causal relation)。完结体的事件结构可以表达为[CAUSE(DO)[BECOME(BE)]],其中CAUSE和BECOME是两个功能语类,DO和BE是两个实体(entity)。这两个实体间本身是没有致使关系的。它们之间的致使关系是通过功能语类CAUSE和BECOME表达的。根据完结体的事件结构,我们详尽分析了汉语中不同动结结构的句法结构,并指出:动结结构的释义和歧义现象是由句法结构的差异造成的。完结体的事件结构可以给汉语中的得字结构以及英语的动结结构一个统一的解释。论文在结语部分总结了本研究的意义和存在的问题,把论元结构和事件结构之间的关系作为今后的一个研究课题。
This dissertation is dedicated to a research on the eventuality of Mandarin Chinese (MC). It is acknowledged that state, activity, achievement and accomplishment are the four basic aspectual types of verbs. In some languages like English, the four lexical aspects are denoted in the Lexicon, but in other languages, such as MC, this is not the case. As we know, the mono-morphemic verbs in MC are void of telicity. And due to this property, we claim that they can only denote the eventuality of state and activity in the Lexicon. Then, how MC denotes the eventuality of achievement and accomplishment kindles our interest.
     Our study begins from how state and activity are denoted in the Lexicon in the verbal system of MC. Meanwhile, we have explored the event structure of them. Then, we proceed to explore how achievement and accomplishment are denoted in MC. Through our study, we have found that MC has to take advantage of grammatical means to denote the two eventualities: to denote achievement, MC has to add aspect markers to shift the eventuality of state or activity into achievement. Aspect markers function as the eventuality predicate BECOME, which denotes the inchoative change of state; to denote accomplishment, MC has mainly two ways—one is to add aspect markers to activity verbs to denote a result, and the other is to make use of resultative verbal constructions (RVCs). RVCs are complex events which denote accomplishment, with one subevent denoting a cause event and the other subevent denoting a result event. The formation of RVCs can be accommodated in our accomplishment event structure. In addition to RVCs, we have found that DE constructions and English resultative constructions can also be accommodated in the accomplishment event structure. Our dissertation comes to a conclusion that in MC state and activity are denoted in the Lexicon and achievement and accomplishment are denoted in syntax.
引文
Ai, Ressy, Rui-xi. 2004. Event Structure and Syntactic Theory. Spring Tutorial. Harward University.
    Andrew, Radford. 2000. Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction. Cambridge University Press; Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago, I11.: University of Chicago Press.
    Baker, Mark. 1989. Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry. 20: 513-553.
    Belletti, Adriana. And Luigi, Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and theta-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 6: 291-352.
    
    Belletti, A. 1988. The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1-34.
    Bowers. 1993. The Syntax of Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591-656.
    Bresnan, Joan. 1982. The Passive in Lexical Theory. In Joan Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press Series on Cognitive Theory and Mental Representation, pages 3-86, Cambridge: Massachusetts, London: England: The MOT Press.
    Bresnan, Joan, and Jonni M. Kanerva. 1989. Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1-50.
    Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical functional syntax. London: Blackwell.
    Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
    Carlson. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts.
    Carrier, Jill and Nanet H. Randall. 1992. The Argument Structure and Syntactic Structure of Resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23, 173-234.
    Chang, Claire Hsun-huei. 1991. Interaction between syntax and morphology: A case study of Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.
    Chen, Ping. 1988. Lun Xiandai Hanyu Shijian Xitong de Sanyuan Jiegou (On a tripartite structure of the temporal system in Modern Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen. No.2.
    Chen, Qian-rui. 2003. Hanyu timao xitong yanjiu (A study on the aspect of Chinese). Central China Normal University. Ph.D dissertation.
    Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origine, and Use. New Yourk: Praeger.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation, In Principles and parameter sin Comparative Grammar, ed. R. Freidin. Cambeidge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory, In K. Hale and J. Keyser (eds.) The view from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 1-52.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Some observations on economy in generative grammar, In Pilar Barbosa. Danny Fox. Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis, and David Pesetsdy, eds., Is the best good enough? Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Chomsky, Noam. 2000. "Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework". In: R. Martin et al. (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase, In Michael Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in Language (pp. 1-52). Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. Adrian Belletti. The
    Cartography of Syntactic Structure. Vol. 3. Structure and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Chomsky, Noam. 2005a. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36: 1-22.
    Chomsky, Noam. 2005b. On Phases. C.P. Otero et al. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. MIT.
    
    Chomsky, Noam. 2006. Approaching UG from below. Unpublished ms. MIT.
    Chu, Chauncey C. 1976. Some semantic aspects of action verbs. Lingua 40: 43-54.
    Chu, Chauncey C. 1983. A reference grammar of Chinese for English speakers. New York: Peter Lang.
    Collins, Chris. 1997. Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 28: 461-497.
    Dai, John Xiang-ling. 1992a. The head in wo pao DE kuai. Journal of Chinese Linguistics. 20: 84-119.
    Dai, John Xiang-ling. 1992b. Rethinking Case Theory for constituency and world order in Chinese. Journal of the Chinese Language Teaching Association. 27: 85-110.
    Davidson, Donald. 1967. "The logic form of action sentences." In Nicholas Tescher (ed.) The Logic of Decision and Action: 81-95. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Dowty, David. 1979. "Aspectual classes of verbs", In Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: the semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague's PTQ (Chapter 2). Dordrecht: Reidel.
    Dowty, David 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67: 546-619.
    Fang, Yu-qing. 1992. Hanyu yufa lun (On the Grammar of Chinese). Commercial Publishing House. Beijing. 1986 reprinted.
    Fillmore, Charles. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in linguistic theory, eds. Emmon Bach and Robert Harms, 1-88. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston. Fodor, Jerry. 1970. Three Reasons for Not Driving "Kill" from "cause to Die". Linguistic Inquiry 1: 429-438.
    Gao, Ming-kai. 1948. Hanyu Yufa Lun (On Chinese Grammar). Commercial Publishing House. Beijing. Reprinted in 1986.
    Goldberg, Adele E., and Ray Jachendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80, No. 4. 532-568.
    Grimshaw and Mester. 1988. Light verbs and theta marking. Linguistic Inquiry. 19: 205-232.
    
    Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    Grimshaw, Jane. 1993. Semantic structure and semantic content. Unpublished ms. Rutgers University, New Jersey.
    Gu, Yang. 1999. Dongci De Ti Ji Titai (the aspect and aspectuality of verb). Gongxing yu gexing-hanyu yuyanxue zhong de zhengyi (Similarities and Differences—The Debate in Chinese Linguistics.), ed. By Xu Liejiong, 191-212. Beijing: Beijing Yuyan Wenhua Chubanshe.
    Guo, Yue. 1993. Hanyu Dongci de Guocheng Jiegou (The Structure of the Process of Chinese Verbs). Zhongguo Yuwen. No. 6.
    Guo, Yue. 1997. Guocheng yu Feiguocheng. Hanyu Weicixing Chengfen de Liang Zhong Waizai Shijian Leixing (Process and Non-process—Two kinds of external temporal types of the predicates in Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen. No. 3.
    Hale, Kenneth and Samuel J. Keyser. 1991. On the syntax of argument structure. Lexicon Project Working Papers, Center for Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    Hale, Kenneth and Samuel J. Keyser. 1993. "On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations". In Kenneth Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds.) The view from building 20: essays in Linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp.51-109). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    Hale, Kenneth and Samuel J. Keyser. 1997. On the complex nature of simple predicators. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan & P. Sells (eds.), Complex Predicates, CSLI. Stanford University, 29-66.
    Hale, Kenneth and Samuel J. Keyser. 1998. The basic elements of argument structure. In Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect: MIT working papers in linguistics 32, ed. Heidi Harley, 73-118. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MITWPL.
    Hale, Kenneth and Samuel J. Keyser 1999. Bound features, merge, and transitivity alternations, In Papers from the Penn/MIT roundtable on the lexicon: MIT working papers in linguistics 35, ed. Linia Pylkkanen, Angeliek van Hout, and Heidi Harley, 73-118. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MITWPL.
    Hale, Kenneth and Samuel J. Keyser 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    
    Hashimoto, Anne Yue. 1971. Mandarin Syntactic Structures. Unicorn No.8 1-146.
    He, Bao-zhang. 1992. Situation types and aspectual classes of verbs in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
    He, Yuan-jian. 1995. X biaogang lilun yu hanyu duanyu jiegou (X-bar theory and the phrase structure in Chinese). Foreign Linguistics. No.2. 36-44.
    Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. Small Clause Results. Lingua 74, 101-139.
    Hoekstra, Teun. 1992. Aspect and Theta Theory. In I. M. Roca, (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, 145-174. Foris, Berlin.
    Hoekstra, Teun and Ian Roberts. 1993. Middle Constructions in Dutch and English. In Knowledge and Language. Vol.2: Lexical and Conceptual Structure, ed. Eric Reuland and Werner Abraham, 183-220, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Huang, C. -T. James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
    Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531-74.
    Huang, C.-T. James. 1987. Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In E. J. Reuland et al (eds.) The representation of(in)definiteness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 226-253.
    Huang, C.-T. James. 1988. "WO PAO DE KUAI and Chinese Phrase Structure" Language 64: 274.
    Huang, C. -T. James. 1990. Zhongwen de liang zhong jiwu dongci he liang zhong bu jiwu dongci (Two kinds of transitive verbs and two kinds of intransitive verbs in Chinese). In T. -C. Tang et al (eds.) Di'er jie shijie huayu jiaoxue yantaohui lunwen ji (Proceedings of the second international Conference on Chinese Teaching). Taipei: World Chinese Press, 39-59.
    Huang, C.-T. James. 1991. "On verb movement and some syntax-semantics mismatches in Chinese." In Proceedings of the 2nd Internaltional Symposium of Chinese Languages and Linguistics. Academia Sinica, Taipei.
    Huang, C.-T. James. 1997. "On lexical structure and syntactic projection." In Chinese languages and linguistics Ⅲ: morphology and lexicon (pp45-89). Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, No.2. Taipei, Taiwan.
    Huang, C.-T. James. 1999. "Chinese passives in comparative perspective." Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies Vol. 29. 4: 423-509. National Tsing Hua University.
    Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
    Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Jackendoff, Ray. 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41: 9-45.
    Jackendoff, Ray. 1996. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 305-354.
    Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The Architecture of Language Faculty. Cambridge, Mass,: MIT Press.
    Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 577-636.
    Jacobsen, Wesley M. 1992. The transitivity structure of events in Japanese. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.
    Kenny, Anthony. 1963. Actions, Emotions and Will. London: Routledge & Legan Paul.
    Kratzer, A. 1989. An investigation into the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 607-653.
    Kratzer, A. 1996. "Severing the External Argument from its Verb", in John Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.) Phrase Structure and the Lexicon (pp. 109-137). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Krifka, Manfred 1986. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massenterman, Individualtermen, Aspecktklassen. PhD thesis, niversity of Munich. (Published Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1989)
    Krifka, Manfred 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution, and quantification in event semantics, in: Renate Bartsch, Johan van Bentham, and Peter van Emde Boas (eds), Semantics and Contextual Expressions. Dordrecht: Foris.
    Krifka, Manfred. 1992. "Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution." In I. Sag and A. Szabolsci (eds.) Lexical matters. Standford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    Krifka, Manfred 1998. The origins of telicity. In: Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Larson, R. 1988. "On the double object construction." Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-391.
    Larson, R. 1990. Double Object Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic lnquiry, 21: 589-632.
    Larson, R. 1991. Promise and the Theory of Control. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 103-139.
    Lasnik, H. 1992. Case and expletives: Notes toward a parametric account. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 381-405.
    Lasnik, H. 1995a. Case and expletives revisited: On greed and other human failings. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 615-634.
    Lasnik, H. 1995b. Last resort. In S. Haraguchi and M. Funaki (eds.) Minimalism and Linguistic Theory. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing, pp.1-32. (Reprinted, with minor revisions, in H. Lasnik (1999) Minirnalist Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.)
    Lasnik, H. 1995c. Last resort and attract F. In Papers from the 6th Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, Vol. 1, pp. 62-81.
    Lefebvre, Claire and Pieter Muysken. 1988. Mixed Categories: Nominalizations in Quechua. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    Levin, Beth. 1999. Objecthood: An event structure perspective. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.
    Levin, Beth. 2000. Aspect, lexical semantic representation, and argument expression. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    Levin, Beth and Malka Rappapport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Levin, Beth. 2003. Objecthood and object alternations. Talk given at the GSAS Workshop in comparative syntax and linguistic theory, Harvard University.
    Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Li, Jin-xi. 1924. Xin Zhu Guowen Wenfa (A New Grammar of Chinese). Commercial Publishing House. Beijing. Reprinted in 1982.
    Li, Lin. 2005. Quxiangci Qilai De Xiangguan Geshi he Yufahua Yanjiu (The Format of Direction Word Qilai and the Study on Its Grammaticalization). MA Thesis. Shanghai Normal University. Shanghai.
    Li, Ping. 1989. Aspect and aktionsart in child Mandarin. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Leiden, Netherlands.
    Li, Ya-fei. 1990. On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 177-207.
    Li, Ya-fei. 1993. Structural Head and Aspectuality. Language. Vol. 69, No. 3 480-504.
    Li, Ya-fei. 1995. The Thematic Hierarchy and Causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13, 255-282.
    Li, Y.-H. 1990. Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Liina Pylkkanen. 2002. Introducing Arguments. Ph.D thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    Lin, Jimmy. 2004. Event structure and the encoding of arguments: The syntax of the Mandarin and English verb phrase. Ph.D dissertation. MIT.
    Lin, Jo-wang. 2005. The Third International Conference on Formal Linguistics; The Second Yuelu Language Acquisition Workshop. Sept. 23-24, 2005. Changsha, Hunan Province.
    Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Irvine.
    Lu, Shu-xiang. 1942. Zhongguo Wenfa Yaolue (A Sketch of Chinese Grammar). Commercial Publishing House. Beijing. Reprinted in 1982.
    Lu, Shu-xiang. 1979. Hanyu Yufa Fenxi Wenti. "The Issues of Chinese Grammatical Analysis". Beijing. The Commercial Publishing House.
    Lu, Shu-xiang. 1980. Xiandai hanyu babai ci (800 words in Modern Chinese). Commercial Publishing House. Beijing.
    Marantz, A. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Marantz, A. and Halle, M. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In K. Hale and S.J. Keyser (eds.), The View From Building 20, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 111-176
    Marantz, A. 1997. No Escape from Syntax: Don't Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of your Own Lexicon, in A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, et al., eds., University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 42, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, 201-225.
    Mark C. Baker 1989 "Object Sharing and Projection in Serial Verb Constructions", Linguistic Inquiry, Volume 20. Number 4: 513-553.
    McCawley, J. 1968. "Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without Deep Structure." In Proceedings of the 4th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: 71-80.
    Mei, Zu-lin. 1994. Tangdai, songdai gongtongyu de yufa he xiandai fangyan de yufa (A Grammar of the Common Language in Tang and Song Dynasties and a Grammar of Dialects). Zhongguo Jingnei Yuyan ji Yuyanxue Bao. No.2.
    Mittwoch, Anita. 1991. In defense of Cendler's achievements. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6 (Perspectives on aspect and aktionsart).
    Nishiyama, Kunio. 1998. V-V compounds as serialization. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 175-217.
    Pan, H.-H. 1996. Imperfective aspect zhe, agent deletion, and locative inversion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 409-432.
    Pan, Yun-zhong. 1980. Hanyu Dongbu Jiegou de Fazhan (The development of Resultatives in Mandarin Chinese) Zhongguo Yuwen No. 1.
    Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: a study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    Perlmutter, D. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, pp. 157-189.
    Pinon, Chris. 1997. Achievements in an event semantics. Proceedings of SALT 7, ed. A. Lawson and E. Cho. CLC Publications, Cornell University.
    Pustejovsky, James. 1991. "The syntax of event structure". Cognition 41: 47-81.
    Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    Rappaport, M. and B. Levin. 1988. "What to do with theta-roles." In W. Wilkins (ed.) Thematic relations, syntax and semantics 21: 7-36. New York: Academic Press.
    Rappaport, M. and B. Levin. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, ed. Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
    Rappaport, M. and B. Levin. 2001. An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 11:199-191.
    
    Rapoport, T. R. 1999. "Structure, aspect, and the predicate." Language 75: 653-677.
    Rizzi, Luigi. 1989. Relativized Minimality. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    Rohsenow, J. S. 1978. Perfect le: Aspect and relative tense in Mandarin Chinese. Proceedings of symposium on Chinese Linguistics: 1977 Linguistic Institute of LSA, ed. By Robert Cheng, Y. C. Li and T. C. Tang, 267-291. Taipei: Sudent Book Co. Ltd.
    Ross, Claudia. 1984. Adverbial modification in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics. 12: 207-234.
    Rothstein, Susan 2004 Structuring Events. A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. First published 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Barnes and Nobles.
    Shi, Yu-zhi and Bai, Xie-hong. 2006. The Different Conceptualizations of Adjectives of Chinese and English and Their Effects on Grammar and Semantics. Journal of Sichuan International Studies University. Vol. 22. No. 6. P77-82.
    Shi, Zi-qiang. 1988. The present of past of the particle le in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
    Simpson, Jane. 1983. Resultatives. In Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, ed. Lori Levin, Malka Rappaport, and Annie Zaenen, 143-157. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    Smith, Carlota. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    
    Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The Parameter of aspect, 2~(nd) edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Soh Hooi Ling and Kuo, Yi-chun Jenny. 2001. Perfective Aspect and Accomplishment Situations in Mandarin Chinese. In Proceedings of the Conference Perspective on Aspect, December 12-14, Utrecht Institute ofLinguistics.
    
    Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of Phrase Structure. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
    Sung, K. 1992. Chinese Middle and the Affectedness Condition. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Singapore.
    Sung, K-M. 1994 Case Assignment under Incorporation, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
    Sung, K-M. 1997. Ju fa li lun gai yao (Essentials of Syntactic Theory), The Social Science Academy Press, Beijing.
    Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Szeto, Yee-kit. 1988. A semantic description of aspectual and temporal reference in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.
    Tai, James H-Y., and Jane Y. Chou. 1975. On the equivalent of "kill" in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 10: 48-52.
    Tai, James H-Y. 1984. Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler's four categories, In Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics, ed. David Teten, Veena Mishra, and Joseph Drogo. Chicago, Illinois: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    Teng, Shou-hsin. 1975. A semantic study of transitivity relations in Chinese. Berkeley: University of Californian Press.
    
    Teng, Shou-hsin. 1981. Semantic transitivity in Chinese. Taipei: Student Book.
    Teng, Shou-hsin. 1986. Hanyu dongci de shijian jiegou (The temporal structure of Chinese verbs). Proceedings of the first International Chinese Teaching Seminar. Beijing. Beijing Yuyuan Xueyuan Publishing House.
    Tenny, Carol. 1987. Grammaricalizing Aspect and Affectedness. Ph.D dissertation, MIT, Camridge, MA.
    Tenny, Carol. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic.
    Tenny, Carol and James Pustejovsky. 2000. "A history of events in linguistic theory." In Tenny, Carol and James Pustejovsky (eds.) Events as grammatical objects. Stanford, CA.: CSLI Publications.
    Thompson, Ellen. 2003. The structure of bounded events, ms. Florida International University.
    Tsao, Feng-fu. 1996. On verb classification in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics. Vol. 24, No.1139-190.
    Vendler. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review LXVI: 143-60. Reprinted in a revised version in Vender (1967).
    Vendler, Zeno. 1967. "Verbs and times." In Linguistics in philosophy (pp97-121). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Verkuyl, H. J. 1972. On the compositional nature of the aspect. Dordrecht: Reidel.
    Verkuyl, H. J. 1989. Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 39-94.
    Verkuyl, H. J. 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Verspoor, Cornelia Maria. 1997. Resultatives, compositionality and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6.1-49.
    Wang, Li. 1943. Zhongguo Xiandai Yufa (The Modern Chinese Grammar). Commercial Publishing House. Beijing. Reprinted in 1981.
    Wang, Li. 1954. Zhongguo yufa lilun (Theory of Chinese Grammar). Peking: Zhonghua Shuju.
    Wang, Min. 2002. Xiandai Hanyu VP Qilai de Yufa Yuyi Fenxi (The Analysis of the Grammar and Semantics of Qilai in Modern Chinese). Anhui Normal University. Anhui.
    Wu, Xiuzhi, Zoe (2000)Grammaricalization and the development of Functional Categories in Chinese. The Faculty of the Graduate School University of Southern California. Ph.D Dissertation.
    Xing, Fu-yi. 1994. Xingrongci dongtai hua de quxiang moshi (The Model of Dynamic Adjectives). Hubei University Journals (Philosophy and Social Science Version). No. 5. P5-17. Hubei University.
    Yang, Shou-xun. 1998. DE de shengcheng yufa yanjiu (The Generative Grammar study on DE). Modern Foreign Language. No. 1.52-73.
    Yeh, Meng. 1993. The stative situation and the imperfective zhe in Mandarin. Journal of the Chinese Language Teacher Association ⅩⅩⅧ. 1 : 69-98.
    Zhao, Yuan-ren. (1968) Hanyu Kouyu Yufa (The Grammar of Oral Chinese). Translated by Lu Shu-xiang. Beijing. The Commercial Publishing House.
    Zhu, De-xi. 1982. Yufa Jiangyi (Lectures on Grammar). Commercial Publishing House. Beijing.
    Zou, Ke. 1994. Resultatives V-V compounds in Chinese. In MIT working papers in linguistics 22, ed. Heidi Harley and Colin Phillips, 271-290. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MITWPL.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700