TMR中peNDF水平对奶牛瘤胃发酵及产奶性能的影响
|
摘要
本文以研究不同水平苜蓿干草的TMR中peNDF对奶牛生产性能的影响为主要目的,包括以下三部分试验:
试验一选用3头体况良好、平均体重为550±50kg、安装永久性瘤胃瘘管的中国荷斯坦奶牛,采用3×3拉丁方试验设计,以苜蓿干草不同切割长度(1cm、3cm和5cm),在18%(DM基础上)的添加水平下配制3种TMR饲喂奶牛,研究日粮中peNDF水平对奶牛瘤胃发酵的影响。结果表明:提高日粮peNDF水平,奶牛瘤胃pH升高,NH3-N浓度、总挥发性脂肪酸产量及其组成成分随日粮peNDF水平升高而增加,但乙酸/丙酸值下降,其中丙酸含量3cm和5cm组较1cm组均显著增加(p<0.05),5cm组较1cm组丁酸含量显著升高(p<0.05)。
试验二选择21头不同胎次(第一和第二胎次各9头,第三胎次3头)处于泌乳中期的中国荷斯坦奶牛,采用3×3拉丁方设计,在3个苜蓿干草切割长度(1cm、3cm和5cm)和3种添加水平(9%、18%和27%,DM基础上)下配制9种TMR饲喂奶牛,以研究peNDF水平对采食和产奶性能的影响。结果表明:日粮peNDF水平对三个胎次奶牛DMI均无显著影响(p>0.05),NDFI、ADFI和peNDFI1.18均随peNDF水平升高而增加,且第一胎次苜蓿干草添加水平为9%时,5cm组和1cm组NDFI、3cm组和1cm组ADFI、3cm和5cm两组和1cm组peNDFI1.18均有显著差异(p<0.05),5cm组ADFI较1cm组极显著提高(p<0.01);添加水平为18%和27%时,5cm组与1cm组ADFI均有显著差异(p<0.05),18%时,5cm组与1cm组peNDFI1.18差异极显著(p<0.01)。第二胎次,添加水平为9%时,5cm组和1cm组NDFI差异显著(p<0.05),1cm组ADFI与3cm组差异显著(p<0.05),与5cm组差异极显著(p<0.05),3cm和5cm组peNDFI1.18较1cm组显著增加(p<0.05),添加水平为27%时,1cm组ADFI也较3cm组显著降低(p<0.05),且与5cm组差异极显著(p<0.01),5cm组和1cm组peNDFI1.18差异显著(p<0.05)。第三胎次,5cm组和1cm组NDFI、peNDFI1.18差异显著(p<0.05)。日粮peNDF水平对三个胎次奶牛产奶量影响均不显著。第一胎次,9%添加水平下,乳脂率和总固体3cm组较5cm组显著提高(p<0.05),27%时,3cm组尿素氮含量较5cm组显著上升(p<0.05)。
试验三选用3头体况良好、平均体重为550±50kg的中国荷斯坦奶牛,安装永久性瘤胃瘘管,采用尼龙袋法和扫描电镜技术研究紫花苜蓿茎、叶瘤胃动态降解过程,以研究瘤胃微生物在不同时间点对紫花苜蓿茎、叶的消化作用。结果表明:6h内,瘤胃微生物在苜蓿茎叶气孔周围大量附着,6h后苜蓿叶片叶肉的栅栏组织被快速降解,并在12h后消失。苜蓿茎表皮破裂后,薄壁组织、厚角组织、韧皮部和形成层被快速降解,髓在24h消失,48h时主要为初生木质部和木质部,72h后以木质部为主,瘤胃微生物降解部位依次为表皮和髓、薄壁组织、韧皮部、厚角组织、形成层、初生木质部、木质部。
The study was conducted to investigate the effects of physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF) of diffferent levels containing alfalfa hay in total mixed ration (TMR) on the production of cows, which contained 3 experiments.
In experiment 1, we studied the effects of peNDF of alfalfa hay on rumen fermentation in cows fed with TMR. Three healthy Chinese Holstein cows with the average weight of 550±50 kg were fitted with permanent rumen cannulas and used as experimental animals in the experiment, which were arranged into a 3×3 Latin Square. The alfalfa hay with different lengths ( 1cm, 3cm or 5cm ) was added in TMR and the weight of alfalfa hay accounted for 18% of the total ration ( dry matter basis ). Results showed that with the increasing of peNDF levels, the rumen pH, NH3-N concentration, total volatile fatty acid and fatty acid composition contents were increased and the ration of butyrate to propionate was decreased. The concentrations of propionate of the cows fed with 3cm and 5cm lengths alfalfa hay were significantly higher ( p<0.05 ) than that of those fed with 1cm. The contents of butyric acid in the group fed with 5cm length alfalfa hay was significantly higher than 1cm ( p<0.05 ).
The objective of the experiment 2 was to investigate the effects of peNDF levels on the feed intake and milk performance of dairy cows. Total of twenty-one Chinese Holstein mid-lactating cows were selected as experimental animals. The parity of selected cows was 1 ( 9 cows ),2 ( 9 cows ) and 3 ( 3 cows ), respectively. A 3×3 Latin Square design was used to study the effects of different lengths ( 1cm、3cm or 5cm ) and addition levels ( 9%, 18% and 27%,DM basis ) of alfalfa hay on the feed intake and milk performance of dairy cows. Results showed that dry matter intake ( DMI ) was not significantly affected ( p>0.05 ) by levels of peNDF in the diets for all treatments. NDFI, ADFI and peNDFI1.18, were linearly increased with increasing dietary peNDF. While the level of addition was 9%,intake of NDF was significantly different between 5cm group and 1cm of primiparous cows ( p<0.05 ). The same consequence also was found peNDFI1.18 of 3cm and 5cm group ( p<0.05 ), comparing to 1cm, as well as ADFI of 3cm and 5cm group ( p<0.05, p<0.01, respectively). Both 18% and 27%, ADFI of 5cm group increased compared with 1cm significantly ( p<0.05 ), and intake of peNDF1.18 was very significant when the level of addition was 18% ( p<0.01 ). To the second parity, NDFI of 5cm group increased significantly compared with 1cm ( p<0.05 ), Intake of ADF was significantly difference between 1cm group and 3cm, Furthermore, compared with 5cm, 1cm group descended very significantly ( p<0.01 ), for peNDFI1.18, both 3cm and 5cm group were more than 1cm group ( p<0.05 ) as 9%. Additive level was 27%, ADFI of 1cm group also breakdowned compared with 3cm and 5cm group ( p<0.05, p<0.01, respectively), while peNDFI1.18 was significant between 5cm and 1cm group. Compared with 1cm, NDFI of 5cm group improved significantly, as well as peNDFI1.18 ( p<0.05 ) for the thrid parity. However, dietary peNDF did not significantly improve milk production. AS 9%, compared with 5cm group, fat and totle solid in milk of 3cm group raised significantly ( p<0.05 ), meanwhile, the content of Urea nitrogen had the same trend when the level of addition was 27% ( p<0.05 ).
In experiment 3, three healthy Chinese Holstein cows with the average body weight of 550±50 kg were fitted with permanent rumen cannulas and used as experimental animals to study the degradability of the stem and leaf of alfalfa in rumen with the technology of nylon bag and scanning electron microscopy technique. The results showed that ruminant microflora attached to the epidermis of the stem and leaf around stoma within 6h. Palisade of mesophyll was rapidly degraded within 6h and then veins and spongy tissue were exposed. After 12h of fermentation, the leaf completely disappeared. Alfalfa stem epidermis was broken alfter 12h, and parenchyma, collenchyma, phloem, cambium and pith were totally degraded within 24h. After 48h, only the primary xylem and xylem-based were left. After 72h, the only undegradation part is xylem. The turn of the digestive order are skin and pith, parenchyma, phloem, collenchyma, cambium, primary xylem, xylem.
试验一选用3头体况良好、平均体重为550±50kg、安装永久性瘤胃瘘管的中国荷斯坦奶牛,采用3×3拉丁方试验设计,以苜蓿干草不同切割长度(1cm、3cm和5cm),在18%(DM基础上)的添加水平下配制3种TMR饲喂奶牛,研究日粮中peNDF水平对奶牛瘤胃发酵的影响。结果表明:提高日粮peNDF水平,奶牛瘤胃pH升高,NH3-N浓度、总挥发性脂肪酸产量及其组成成分随日粮peNDF水平升高而增加,但乙酸/丙酸值下降,其中丙酸含量3cm和5cm组较1cm组均显著增加(p<0.05),5cm组较1cm组丁酸含量显著升高(p<0.05)。
试验二选择21头不同胎次(第一和第二胎次各9头,第三胎次3头)处于泌乳中期的中国荷斯坦奶牛,采用3×3拉丁方设计,在3个苜蓿干草切割长度(1cm、3cm和5cm)和3种添加水平(9%、18%和27%,DM基础上)下配制9种TMR饲喂奶牛,以研究peNDF水平对采食和产奶性能的影响。结果表明:日粮peNDF水平对三个胎次奶牛DMI均无显著影响(p>0.05),NDFI、ADFI和peNDFI1.18均随peNDF水平升高而增加,且第一胎次苜蓿干草添加水平为9%时,5cm组和1cm组NDFI、3cm组和1cm组ADFI、3cm和5cm两组和1cm组peNDFI1.18均有显著差异(p<0.05),5cm组ADFI较1cm组极显著提高(p<0.01);添加水平为18%和27%时,5cm组与1cm组ADFI均有显著差异(p<0.05),18%时,5cm组与1cm组peNDFI1.18差异极显著(p<0.01)。第二胎次,添加水平为9%时,5cm组和1cm组NDFI差异显著(p<0.05),1cm组ADFI与3cm组差异显著(p<0.05),与5cm组差异极显著(p<0.05),3cm和5cm组peNDFI1.18较1cm组显著增加(p<0.05),添加水平为27%时,1cm组ADFI也较3cm组显著降低(p<0.05),且与5cm组差异极显著(p<0.01),5cm组和1cm组peNDFI1.18差异显著(p<0.05)。第三胎次,5cm组和1cm组NDFI、peNDFI1.18差异显著(p<0.05)。日粮peNDF水平对三个胎次奶牛产奶量影响均不显著。第一胎次,9%添加水平下,乳脂率和总固体3cm组较5cm组显著提高(p<0.05),27%时,3cm组尿素氮含量较5cm组显著上升(p<0.05)。
试验三选用3头体况良好、平均体重为550±50kg的中国荷斯坦奶牛,安装永久性瘤胃瘘管,采用尼龙袋法和扫描电镜技术研究紫花苜蓿茎、叶瘤胃动态降解过程,以研究瘤胃微生物在不同时间点对紫花苜蓿茎、叶的消化作用。结果表明:6h内,瘤胃微生物在苜蓿茎叶气孔周围大量附着,6h后苜蓿叶片叶肉的栅栏组织被快速降解,并在12h后消失。苜蓿茎表皮破裂后,薄壁组织、厚角组织、韧皮部和形成层被快速降解,髓在24h消失,48h时主要为初生木质部和木质部,72h后以木质部为主,瘤胃微生物降解部位依次为表皮和髓、薄壁组织、韧皮部、厚角组织、形成层、初生木质部、木质部。
The study was conducted to investigate the effects of physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF) of diffferent levels containing alfalfa hay in total mixed ration (TMR) on the production of cows, which contained 3 experiments.
In experiment 1, we studied the effects of peNDF of alfalfa hay on rumen fermentation in cows fed with TMR. Three healthy Chinese Holstein cows with the average weight of 550±50 kg were fitted with permanent rumen cannulas and used as experimental animals in the experiment, which were arranged into a 3×3 Latin Square. The alfalfa hay with different lengths ( 1cm, 3cm or 5cm ) was added in TMR and the weight of alfalfa hay accounted for 18% of the total ration ( dry matter basis ). Results showed that with the increasing of peNDF levels, the rumen pH, NH3-N concentration, total volatile fatty acid and fatty acid composition contents were increased and the ration of butyrate to propionate was decreased. The concentrations of propionate of the cows fed with 3cm and 5cm lengths alfalfa hay were significantly higher ( p<0.05 ) than that of those fed with 1cm. The contents of butyric acid in the group fed with 5cm length alfalfa hay was significantly higher than 1cm ( p<0.05 ).
The objective of the experiment 2 was to investigate the effects of peNDF levels on the feed intake and milk performance of dairy cows. Total of twenty-one Chinese Holstein mid-lactating cows were selected as experimental animals. The parity of selected cows was 1 ( 9 cows ),2 ( 9 cows ) and 3 ( 3 cows ), respectively. A 3×3 Latin Square design was used to study the effects of different lengths ( 1cm、3cm or 5cm ) and addition levels ( 9%, 18% and 27%,DM basis ) of alfalfa hay on the feed intake and milk performance of dairy cows. Results showed that dry matter intake ( DMI ) was not significantly affected ( p>0.05 ) by levels of peNDF in the diets for all treatments. NDFI, ADFI and peNDFI1.18, were linearly increased with increasing dietary peNDF. While the level of addition was 9%,intake of NDF was significantly different between 5cm group and 1cm of primiparous cows ( p<0.05 ). The same consequence also was found peNDFI1.18 of 3cm and 5cm group ( p<0.05 ), comparing to 1cm, as well as ADFI of 3cm and 5cm group ( p<0.05, p<0.01, respectively). Both 18% and 27%, ADFI of 5cm group increased compared with 1cm significantly ( p<0.05 ), and intake of peNDF1.18 was very significant when the level of addition was 18% ( p<0.01 ). To the second parity, NDFI of 5cm group increased significantly compared with 1cm ( p<0.05 ), Intake of ADF was significantly difference between 1cm group and 3cm, Furthermore, compared with 5cm, 1cm group descended very significantly ( p<0.01 ), for peNDFI1.18, both 3cm and 5cm group were more than 1cm group ( p<0.05 ) as 9%. Additive level was 27%, ADFI of 1cm group also breakdowned compared with 3cm and 5cm group ( p<0.05, p<0.01, respectively), while peNDFI1.18 was significant between 5cm and 1cm group. Compared with 1cm, NDFI of 5cm group improved significantly, as well as peNDFI1.18 ( p<0.05 ) for the thrid parity. However, dietary peNDF did not significantly improve milk production. AS 9%, compared with 5cm group, fat and totle solid in milk of 3cm group raised significantly ( p<0.05 ), meanwhile, the content of Urea nitrogen had the same trend when the level of addition was 27% ( p<0.05 ).
In experiment 3, three healthy Chinese Holstein cows with the average body weight of 550±50 kg were fitted with permanent rumen cannulas and used as experimental animals to study the degradability of the stem and leaf of alfalfa in rumen with the technology of nylon bag and scanning electron microscopy technique. The results showed that ruminant microflora attached to the epidermis of the stem and leaf around stoma within 6h. Palisade of mesophyll was rapidly degraded within 6h and then veins and spongy tissue were exposed. After 12h of fermentation, the leaf completely disappeared. Alfalfa stem epidermis was broken alfter 12h, and parenchyma, collenchyma, phloem, cambium and pith were totally degraded within 24h. After 48h, only the primary xylem and xylem-based were left. After 72h, the only undegradation part is xylem. The turn of the digestive order are skin and pith, parenchyma, phloem, collenchyma, cambium, primary xylem, xylem.
引文
[1]张小丽.日粮添加苜蓿干草对奶牛生产性能及血液指标的影响[D].保定:河北农业大学, 2006.
[2]卜永强.小尾寒羊对陇东苜蓿的采食量及表观消化率[J].当代畜牧, 2006, (3): 31-32.
[3]张晓庆,吴秋珏,郝正里等.不同品种苜蓿营养成分及体外消化率动态研究[J].草业科学, 2005, 22(12): 48-51.
[4] Wang D L, Fang J, Xing F et al. Alfalfa as a supplement of dried cornstalk diets: Associative effects on intake, digestibility, nitrogen metabolisation, rumen environment and hematological parameters in sheep[J]. Livestock Sci, 2008, 113: 87-97.
[5] Castillo A R, Taverna M A, P′aez R R et al. Fatty acid composition of milk from dairy cows fed fresh alfalfa based diets[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2006, 131: 241-254.
[6] Whiting C M, Mutsvangwa T, Walton J P et al. Effects of feeding either fresh alfalfa or alfalfa silage on milk fatty acid content in Holstein dairy cows[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2004, 113: 27-37.
[7]田玉民,王立权,杨会平等.日粮对奶牛生产性能及经济效益的影响[J].家畜生态学报, 2006, 27(6): 132-136.
[8]冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社. 2006.
[9] Tafaj M, Zebeli Q, Baes Ch et al. A meta-analysis examining effects of particle size of total mixed rations on intake, rumen digestion and milk production in high-yielding dairy cows in early lactation[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2007, 138: 137-161.
[10] Mertens D R. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 1463-1481.
[11]杨凤.动物营养学[M].北京:中国农业出版社. 2000.
[12] Balch C C. Proposal to use time spent chewing as an index of extent to which diets for ruminants possess the physical property of fibrousness characteristics of roughages[J]. Br J Nutr, 1971, 26: 383-389.
[13] Sudweeks E M, Ely L O, Mertens D R et al. Assessing minimum amounts and form of roughages in ruminant diets: roughage value index system[J]. Anim Sci, 1981, 53: 1406-1411.
[14] Mertens R H, G D R. Influence of Buffer pH and Raw Corn Starch Addition on In Vitro Fiber Digestion Kinetics[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1992, 75: 2762-2768.
[15] Allen M S. Physical constrains on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants[J]. Anim Sci, 1996, 74: 3063-3075.
[16] Fox D G, Tedeschi L O, Tylutki T P,Russell J B et al. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2004, 112: 29-78.
[17] Tylutk T P, Fox D G, Durbal V M et al. Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System:A model for precision feeding of dairy cattle[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2008, 143: 174-202.
[18] Mertens D R. Effect of physical characteristics, forage particle size and density on forage utilization[J]. Proc Nutr.Symp, 1986: 91.
[19] Murphy M R, Zhu J S. A comparison of methods to analyze particle size as an applied to alfalfa haylage, com silage and concentrate mix[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 2932.
[20] Heinrichs A J, Kononoff P J. Evaluating particle size of forages and TMRs using the Pen State Particle Separator Penn State, University Park, PA. 1996.
[21] Russell J B, O'Connor J D, Fox D J. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets. Ruminal fermentation.[J]. Anim Sci, 70: 3551-3561.
[22]孟庆翔.反刍动物瘤胃酸中毒研究的最新进展[C].面对21世纪动物科学与动物医学国际研讨会文集,中国畜牧兽医学会, 2000: 73.
[23] Shaver R D, Nytes A J, Satter L D et al. Influence of amount of feed intake and forage physical form on digestion and passage of prebloom alfalfa hay in dairy cows [J]. J Dairy Sci, 1986, 69: 1545-1559.
[24] Varga G A, Dann H M, Ishler V A. The Use of Fiber Concentrations for Ration Formulation[J].J Dairy Sci, 1998, 81: 3063-3074.
[25] Clark P W, Armentano L E. Effectiveness of neutral detergent fiber in whole cottonseed and dried distillers grains compared with alfalfa haylage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1993, 76: 2644-2650.
[26] Depies K K, Armentano L E. Partial replacement of alfalfa fiber with fiber from ground corn cobs or wheat middlings [J]. J Dairy Sci, 1995, 78: 1328-1335.
[27] Allen M S. Effect of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 2000, 83: 1598-1624.
[28] Campling R C, Freer M. Factors affecting voluntary intake of food by cows. Eight experiments with ground, pelleted roughages[J]. Br J Nutr, 1966, 20: 229.
[29] Owens F N. Limits to starch digestion in the ruminant small intestine [J]. J Anim Sci, 1986, 63: 1634.
[30] Bal M A, Shaver R D, Jirovee A G et al. Crop proessing and chop length of corn silage:effects on intake,digestion and milk production by dairy cows[J]. J.Dairy Sci, 2000, 83: 1264-1273.
[31] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Effects of grain processing,forage to concentrate ratio and feeding levels on digestive processes and feed intake in ruminants passage,digestibility and feed intake[J]. Arch Anim Nutr, 2001a, 54: 243-259.
[32] Tafaj M, Steingass H, Drochner W. Influence of hay particle size at different concentrate and feeding levels on digestive processes and feed intake in ruminants Passage, digestibility and feed intake[J]. Arch Anim Nutr, 2001, 54: 243-259.
[33] Schwab E C, Shaver R D, Shinners K J, Lauer J G, et al. Processing and chop length effects in brown-midrib corn silage on intake,digestion and milk production by dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 85: 613-623.
[34] Kononoff P J, Heinrichs A J. The effect of corn silage particle size and cottonseed hulls on cows in early lacation[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 86: 2438-2451.
[35] Fernandez I, Martin C, Champion M et al. Effect of corn hybrid and chop length of whole-plant corn silage on digestion and intake by dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2004, 87: 1298-1309.
[36] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Effects of physically effective NDF on rumen fermenation and nutrient degestion of dairy cows fed diets based on barley or corn silages[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 86(1): 340.
[37] Grant R J, Colenbrander V F, Mertens D R. Effect of particle size of forage and rumen cannulation upon chewing activity and laterality in dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1990, 73: 3158.
[38]王吉峰.日粮精粗比对奶牛消化代谢及乳脂肪酸成分影响的研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2004.
[39] Mertens D R. Regulation of forage intake[M]. Forage Quality, Evaluation and Utilization G C Fahey, Jr ed Am Soc Agron, Madison WI, 1994: 450.
[40] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Effects of physically effective fiber on digestion and milk milk production by dairy cows fed diets based on corn silage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2005, 88: 1090-1098.
[41] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on site and extent of digestion[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2002, 85: 1958-1968.
[42] Beauchemin K A, Yang W Z, Rode L M. Effects of particle size of alfalfa based Dairy cow diets on the chewing activity,ruminal fermentation,and milk production[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 86: 630-643.
[43] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M et al. Comparision of hulls-less barley, barley,or corn for lactaing cows:effects on extent of digestion and milk production[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 2475-2486.
[44] Beauchemin K A, Yang W Z, Rode L M. Effects of barley grain processing on the site and extent of digestion of beef feedlot finishing diets[J]. Anim Sci, 2001, 79:1925-1936.
[45] Van Soest P J. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant[M]. O&B Books, Inc Corvallis. 1982.
[46] Duric M, Zhao G Y, Orskov E R. Indirect measurement of saliva secretion in sheep fed diets of different structures and the effect of such diets on ruminal fluid kinetics and fermentation pattern[J]. Exper Physiol, 1994, 79: 823-830.
[47] Beauchemin K A, Yang W Z. Effects of Physically Effective Fiber on Intake, Chewing Activity,and Ruminal Acidosis for Dairy Cows Fed Diets Based on Corn Silage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2005, 88: 2117-2129.
[48] Enemark Jo¨rg M D. The monitoring, prevention and treatment of sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA): A review[J]. The Veterinary Journal, 2009, 176:32-43.
[49] Overton T R, Cameron.M R,Elliottt J P, et al. Ruminal fermentation and passage of nutrients to the duodenum of lactating cows fed mixture of corn and barely[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1995, 78: 1981-1998.
[50] Mackie R L, Gilchrist F M C. Change in lactate producing and lactate utilizing bacteria in relation to pH in the rumen of sheep during stepwise adaptation to a high concentrate diet[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1979, 38: 422.
[51] Shinozaki K. Studies on experimental bloat in ruminants-Effects of various volatile Acids introduced into the rumen on the rumen motility[J]. Tohoku J Agric Res, 1959, 9: 237-245.
[52] Hoover W H. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1986, 69: 2755.
[53] Teller E, Vanbelle M, Kamatali P et al. Effects of chewing behavior and ruminal digestion processes on voluntary intake of grass silages by lactating dairy cows[J]. Anim Sci, 1990, 68: 3897.
[54] Dohmea F, Graf C Arrigo M Y et al. Effect of botanical characteristics, growth stage and method of conservation on factors related to the physical structure of forage -An attempt towards a better understanding of the effectiveness of fibre in ruminants[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2007, 138: 205-227.
[55] Grant R H, Mertens D R. Influence of Buffer pH and Raw Corn Starch Addition on In Vitro Fiber Digestion Kinetics[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1992, 75: 2762-2768.
[56] Fischer J M, Buchanan-Smith J G, Campell C et al. Effects of forage particle size and long hay for cows fed total mixed rations based on alfalfa and corn.[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1994, 77: 217-229.
[57] De Brabander D L, De Boever J L, Vanacker J M et al. Evaluation of physical structure in dairy cattle nutrition. In: Garnsworthy P C, Wiseman J (Eds.), Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Nottingham University Press pp, 1999: 111-145.
[58] Oba M, Allen M S. Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1999, 82: 589.
[59] Colenbrander V F, Noller C H, Grant R J. Effect of fiber content and particle size of alfalfa silage on performance and chewing behavior[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1991, 74: 2681-2690.
[60] Hansen W P, Otterby D E, Linn J G et al. Influence of synchronizing protein and starch degradation in the rumen on nutrient utilization and microbial synthesis[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1991, 74: 1361-1369.
[61] Weiss W P, Shockey W L. Value of orchardgrass and alfalfa silages fed with varying amounts of concentrates to dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1991, 74: 1933-1946.
[62] Depies K K, Armentano L E. Particle replacement of alfalfa fiber with and non-structural carbohydrates on lactation and ruminal function[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1995, 76: 1324.
[63] Bernard L, Chaise J P, Baumont R, Poncet C. The effect of physical form of orchard grass hay on the passage of particulate matter through the rumen of sheep[J]. Anim Sci, 2000, 78: 1338-1354.
[64] Fernandez I, Michalet-Doreau B. Effect of maturity stage and choping length of maize silage on particle size reduction in dairy cows[J]. Anim Res, 2002, 51: 445-454.
[65] Junck B, Tafaj M, Zebeli Q et al. Influence of particle size of grass silage fed in TMR on passage rate and digesta volume in high-yielding dairy cows[J]. Proc Soc Nutr Physiol, 2005, 14: 139.
[66] Owens F N, Secrist D S, Hill W J et al. Acidosis in cattle :A review[J]. Anim Sci, 1998, 76: 275-286.
[67] Marie Krause K, Garrett R O. Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2006, 126: 215-236.
[68] Mertens D R. Physically effective NDF and its use in dairy rations explored[J]. Feed stuffs, 2000, 10: 11-14.
[69] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Altering Physically Effective Fiber Intake Through Forage Proportion and Particle Length: Chewing and Ruminal pH[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2007, 90: 2826-2838.
[70] Bhandari S K, Ominski K H, Wittenberg K M et al. Effects of Chop Length of Alfalfa and Corn Silage on Milk Production and Rumen Fermentation of Dairy Cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2007, 90: 2355-2366.
[71] Sairanen Auvo, Khalili Hannele, Virkaja¨rvi Perttu. Concentrate supplementation responses of the pasture-fed dairy cow[J]. Livestock Sci, 2006, 104: 292-302.
[72] Zebeli Q, Tafaj M, Junck B et al. Evaluation of the response of ruminal fermentation and activities of nonstarch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes to particle length of corn silage in dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2008b, 91: 2388-2398.
[73] Allen M S. Relationship between ruminal Fermentation and the requirement for physically effective fiber[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 1447.
[74] Einarson M S, Plaizier J C, Wittenberg K M. Effects of barley silage chop length on productivity and rumen conditions of lactating dairy cows fed a total mixed ration[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2004, 87(9): 2987-2996.
[75] Gray G M. Starch digestion and absorption in nonruminants[J]. J Nutr, 1992, 122: 172.
[76] Bal M A, J G Coors, A R D S. Impact of the maturity of com for use as silage in the diets of dairy cows on intake, digestion, and milk production[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 2497-2503.
[77] Schwab C R, Shaver K J, Shinners J G et al. Processing and chop length effects in brown-midrib corn silage on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2001, 85: 613-623.
[78] Krause K M, Combs D K. Effects of forage particle size and grain fermentability in midlactation cows.I. Milk production and diet digestibility[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2002b, 85: 1947-1957.
[79]张巧娥.苜蓿和玉米青贮的切割长度对奶牛产奶量和瘤胃发酵的影响[J].畜牧与饲料科学, 2008, 1: 9.
[80]贺鸣. TMR中粗饲料不同颗粒大小对干奶牛咀嚼行为和瘤胃发酵的影响[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2005.
[81] Kung L, Sheperd A C, Smagala A M et al. The effect of preservatives based on propionic acid on fermaentation and aerobic stability of corn silage and a totle mixed ration[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1998, 81: 1322-1330.
[82] Le Liboux S, Peyraud J L. Effect of forage particle size and feeding frequencyon fermentation patterns and sites and extent ofdigestion in dairy cows fed mixed diets[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 1999, 76: 297-319.
[83] Krause K M, Comb D K, Beauchemin K A. Effects of forage particle size and grain fermentability in midlactation cows.I.Milk production and diet digestibility[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2002a, 85: 1936-1946.
[84]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第2版)[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社. 2003.
[85] Gherardi S G, Kellaway R C, Black J L. Effect of forage particle length on digesta load, packing density and voluntary feed intake by sheep[J]. Aust J Agric Res, 1992, 43: 1321-1336.
[86] Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Chewing activities and milk proaucnon of dairy cows fed alfalfa as hay silage, or dried cubes or silage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 324-333.
[87] Soita H W, Fehr M, Christensen D A et al. Effects of barley silage of different theoretical cut length on digestion kinetics in ruminants[J] Can J Anim Sci, 2002, 82: 207-213.
[88] Kononoff P J, Mustafa A F, Christensen D A et al. Effects of barley silage particle length and effective fiber on yield and composition of milk from dairy cows[J]. Anim.Sci, 2000, 80: 749-752.
[89] Krause K M, Combs D K. Effects of forage particle size, forage source, and grain fermentability on performance and ruminal pH in midlactation cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 86: 1382-1397.
[90] Soita H W, Christensen D A, Jim A. Influence of particle size on the effectiveness of the fiberin barley silage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2000, 83: 2295-2300.
[91] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Physically effective fiber: method of determination and effects on chewing,ruminal acidosis,and digestion by dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2006, 89(7): 2618-2633.
[92] Asadi Alamoutia A, Alikhania M, Ghorbania G R et al. Effects of inclusion of neutral detergent soluble fibre sources in diets varying in forage particle size on feed intake, digestive processes, and performance of mid-lactation Holstein cows[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2009, 154: 9-23.
[93] Alende M, Depetris G J, Di Marco O N et al. Performance, chewing activity, and ruminal parameters in yearling beef steers fed early-harvested sorghum silage: Effect of chop length and wheat straw addition[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2009, 154: 125-133.
[94] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Increasing the Physically Effective Fiber Content of Dairy Cow Diets May Lower Efficiency of Feed Use[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2006, 89: 2694-2704.
[95] Teimouri Y A, Valizadeh R, Naserian A et al. Effects of alfalfa particle size and specific gravity on chewing activity, digestibility, and performance of Holstein dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2004, 87(11): 3912-3924.
[96] Leonardi C, Giannico F, Armentano L E. Effect of water addition on selective consumption(sorting)of dry diets by dairy cattle[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2005, 88: 1043- 1049.
[97] Plaizier J C, Krause D O, Gozho G N et al. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows:The physiological causes, incidence and consequences[J]. J Veteri, 2009, 176: 21-31.
[98] Zebeli Q, Tafaj M, Steingass H et al. Effects of Physically Effective Fiber on Digestive Processes and Milk Fat Content in Early Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Total Mixed Rations[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2006, 89: 651-668.
[99] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A.Altering Physically Effective Fiber Intake Through Forage Proportion and Particle Length:Digestion and Milk Production[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2007, 90: 3410-3421.
[100] Zebeli Q, Ametaj B N, Junck B et al.Maize silage particle length modulates feeding patterns and milk composition in loose-housed lactating Holstein cows[J]. Livestock Sci, 2009, 124: 33-40.
[101] Penner G B, Yu P, Christensen D A. Effect of replacing forage or concentrate with wet or dry distillers’grains on the productivity and chewing activity of dairy cattle[J].Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2009,153: 1-10.
[102] Zebeli Q, Mansmann D, Steingass H et al. Balancing diets for physically effective fibre and ruminally degradable starch: A key to lower the risk of sub-acute rumen acidosis and improve productivity of dairy cattle[J]. Livestock Sci, 2010, 127: 1-10.
[103] Wilson J R, Mertens D R. Cell wall accessibility and cell structure limitations to microbial digestion offorage[J]. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 251-259.
[104]娜仁花.乳尿素氮(MUN)检测在奶牛生产中的指导意义[J].中国奶牛, 2008, (12): 27-29.
[105]王佳堃.稻草预处理后亚细胞结构及其理化特性变化规律研究[D].浙江大学, 2006.
[106] Engels Ferdinand M, Jung Hans-Joachim G. Alfalfa stem tissues: Impact of lignification and cell length on ruminal degradation of large particles[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2005, 120: 309-321.
[107] Akin D E, Borneman W S. Role of rumen fungi in fiber degradation[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1990, 73: 3023-3032.
[108] Liu D, Liu J X, Zhu S L et al. Histological investigation of tissues and cell wall of rice straw influenced by pretreatment with different chemicals and rumen degradation[J]. Anim Feed Sci, 2005, 14: 373-387.
[109] Cheng K J, McAllister T A. Compartmentation in the rumen. In: Hobson P N, Stewart C S ed The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Lindon:Blackie Academic&Professional, 1997.
[110] Hong B J, Broderick G A, Walgenbach R P. Effect of chemical conditioning of alfalfa on drying rate and nutrient digestion in ruminants[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1988, 71: 1851-1859.
[111] Grncarevic M, Radler F. The effect of wax component on cuticular transpiration-model experiments [J]. Planta, 1967, 75: 23-27.
[2]卜永强.小尾寒羊对陇东苜蓿的采食量及表观消化率[J].当代畜牧, 2006, (3): 31-32.
[3]张晓庆,吴秋珏,郝正里等.不同品种苜蓿营养成分及体外消化率动态研究[J].草业科学, 2005, 22(12): 48-51.
[4] Wang D L, Fang J, Xing F et al. Alfalfa as a supplement of dried cornstalk diets: Associative effects on intake, digestibility, nitrogen metabolisation, rumen environment and hematological parameters in sheep[J]. Livestock Sci, 2008, 113: 87-97.
[5] Castillo A R, Taverna M A, P′aez R R et al. Fatty acid composition of milk from dairy cows fed fresh alfalfa based diets[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2006, 131: 241-254.
[6] Whiting C M, Mutsvangwa T, Walton J P et al. Effects of feeding either fresh alfalfa or alfalfa silage on milk fatty acid content in Holstein dairy cows[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2004, 113: 27-37.
[7]田玉民,王立权,杨会平等.日粮对奶牛生产性能及经济效益的影响[J].家畜生态学报, 2006, 27(6): 132-136.
[8]冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社. 2006.
[9] Tafaj M, Zebeli Q, Baes Ch et al. A meta-analysis examining effects of particle size of total mixed rations on intake, rumen digestion and milk production in high-yielding dairy cows in early lactation[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2007, 138: 137-161.
[10] Mertens D R. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 1463-1481.
[11]杨凤.动物营养学[M].北京:中国农业出版社. 2000.
[12] Balch C C. Proposal to use time spent chewing as an index of extent to which diets for ruminants possess the physical property of fibrousness characteristics of roughages[J]. Br J Nutr, 1971, 26: 383-389.
[13] Sudweeks E M, Ely L O, Mertens D R et al. Assessing minimum amounts and form of roughages in ruminant diets: roughage value index system[J]. Anim Sci, 1981, 53: 1406-1411.
[14] Mertens R H, G D R. Influence of Buffer pH and Raw Corn Starch Addition on In Vitro Fiber Digestion Kinetics[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1992, 75: 2762-2768.
[15] Allen M S. Physical constrains on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants[J]. Anim Sci, 1996, 74: 3063-3075.
[16] Fox D G, Tedeschi L O, Tylutki T P,Russell J B et al. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2004, 112: 29-78.
[17] Tylutk T P, Fox D G, Durbal V M et al. Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System:A model for precision feeding of dairy cattle[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2008, 143: 174-202.
[18] Mertens D R. Effect of physical characteristics, forage particle size and density on forage utilization[J]. Proc Nutr.Symp, 1986: 91.
[19] Murphy M R, Zhu J S. A comparison of methods to analyze particle size as an applied to alfalfa haylage, com silage and concentrate mix[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 2932.
[20] Heinrichs A J, Kononoff P J. Evaluating particle size of forages and TMRs using the Pen State Particle Separator Penn State, University Park, PA. 1996.
[21] Russell J B, O'Connor J D, Fox D J. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets. Ruminal fermentation.[J]. Anim Sci, 70: 3551-3561.
[22]孟庆翔.反刍动物瘤胃酸中毒研究的最新进展[C].面对21世纪动物科学与动物医学国际研讨会文集,中国畜牧兽医学会, 2000: 73.
[23] Shaver R D, Nytes A J, Satter L D et al. Influence of amount of feed intake and forage physical form on digestion and passage of prebloom alfalfa hay in dairy cows [J]. J Dairy Sci, 1986, 69: 1545-1559.
[24] Varga G A, Dann H M, Ishler V A. The Use of Fiber Concentrations for Ration Formulation[J].J Dairy Sci, 1998, 81: 3063-3074.
[25] Clark P W, Armentano L E. Effectiveness of neutral detergent fiber in whole cottonseed and dried distillers grains compared with alfalfa haylage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1993, 76: 2644-2650.
[26] Depies K K, Armentano L E. Partial replacement of alfalfa fiber with fiber from ground corn cobs or wheat middlings [J]. J Dairy Sci, 1995, 78: 1328-1335.
[27] Allen M S. Effect of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 2000, 83: 1598-1624.
[28] Campling R C, Freer M. Factors affecting voluntary intake of food by cows. Eight experiments with ground, pelleted roughages[J]. Br J Nutr, 1966, 20: 229.
[29] Owens F N. Limits to starch digestion in the ruminant small intestine [J]. J Anim Sci, 1986, 63: 1634.
[30] Bal M A, Shaver R D, Jirovee A G et al. Crop proessing and chop length of corn silage:effects on intake,digestion and milk production by dairy cows[J]. J.Dairy Sci, 2000, 83: 1264-1273.
[31] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Effects of grain processing,forage to concentrate ratio and feeding levels on digestive processes and feed intake in ruminants passage,digestibility and feed intake[J]. Arch Anim Nutr, 2001a, 54: 243-259.
[32] Tafaj M, Steingass H, Drochner W. Influence of hay particle size at different concentrate and feeding levels on digestive processes and feed intake in ruminants Passage, digestibility and feed intake[J]. Arch Anim Nutr, 2001, 54: 243-259.
[33] Schwab E C, Shaver R D, Shinners K J, Lauer J G, et al. Processing and chop length effects in brown-midrib corn silage on intake,digestion and milk production by dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 85: 613-623.
[34] Kononoff P J, Heinrichs A J. The effect of corn silage particle size and cottonseed hulls on cows in early lacation[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 86: 2438-2451.
[35] Fernandez I, Martin C, Champion M et al. Effect of corn hybrid and chop length of whole-plant corn silage on digestion and intake by dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2004, 87: 1298-1309.
[36] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Effects of physically effective NDF on rumen fermenation and nutrient degestion of dairy cows fed diets based on barley or corn silages[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 86(1): 340.
[37] Grant R J, Colenbrander V F, Mertens D R. Effect of particle size of forage and rumen cannulation upon chewing activity and laterality in dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1990, 73: 3158.
[38]王吉峰.日粮精粗比对奶牛消化代谢及乳脂肪酸成分影响的研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2004.
[39] Mertens D R. Regulation of forage intake[M]. Forage Quality, Evaluation and Utilization G C Fahey, Jr ed Am Soc Agron, Madison WI, 1994: 450.
[40] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Effects of physically effective fiber on digestion and milk milk production by dairy cows fed diets based on corn silage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2005, 88: 1090-1098.
[41] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on site and extent of digestion[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2002, 85: 1958-1968.
[42] Beauchemin K A, Yang W Z, Rode L M. Effects of particle size of alfalfa based Dairy cow diets on the chewing activity,ruminal fermentation,and milk production[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 86: 630-643.
[43] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M et al. Comparision of hulls-less barley, barley,or corn for lactaing cows:effects on extent of digestion and milk production[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 2475-2486.
[44] Beauchemin K A, Yang W Z, Rode L M. Effects of barley grain processing on the site and extent of digestion of beef feedlot finishing diets[J]. Anim Sci, 2001, 79:1925-1936.
[45] Van Soest P J. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant[M]. O&B Books, Inc Corvallis. 1982.
[46] Duric M, Zhao G Y, Orskov E R. Indirect measurement of saliva secretion in sheep fed diets of different structures and the effect of such diets on ruminal fluid kinetics and fermentation pattern[J]. Exper Physiol, 1994, 79: 823-830.
[47] Beauchemin K A, Yang W Z. Effects of Physically Effective Fiber on Intake, Chewing Activity,and Ruminal Acidosis for Dairy Cows Fed Diets Based on Corn Silage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2005, 88: 2117-2129.
[48] Enemark Jo¨rg M D. The monitoring, prevention and treatment of sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA): A review[J]. The Veterinary Journal, 2009, 176:32-43.
[49] Overton T R, Cameron.M R,Elliottt J P, et al. Ruminal fermentation and passage of nutrients to the duodenum of lactating cows fed mixture of corn and barely[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1995, 78: 1981-1998.
[50] Mackie R L, Gilchrist F M C. Change in lactate producing and lactate utilizing bacteria in relation to pH in the rumen of sheep during stepwise adaptation to a high concentrate diet[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1979, 38: 422.
[51] Shinozaki K. Studies on experimental bloat in ruminants-Effects of various volatile Acids introduced into the rumen on the rumen motility[J]. Tohoku J Agric Res, 1959, 9: 237-245.
[52] Hoover W H. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1986, 69: 2755.
[53] Teller E, Vanbelle M, Kamatali P et al. Effects of chewing behavior and ruminal digestion processes on voluntary intake of grass silages by lactating dairy cows[J]. Anim Sci, 1990, 68: 3897.
[54] Dohmea F, Graf C Arrigo M Y et al. Effect of botanical characteristics, growth stage and method of conservation on factors related to the physical structure of forage -An attempt towards a better understanding of the effectiveness of fibre in ruminants[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2007, 138: 205-227.
[55] Grant R H, Mertens D R. Influence of Buffer pH and Raw Corn Starch Addition on In Vitro Fiber Digestion Kinetics[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1992, 75: 2762-2768.
[56] Fischer J M, Buchanan-Smith J G, Campell C et al. Effects of forage particle size and long hay for cows fed total mixed rations based on alfalfa and corn.[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1994, 77: 217-229.
[57] De Brabander D L, De Boever J L, Vanacker J M et al. Evaluation of physical structure in dairy cattle nutrition. In: Garnsworthy P C, Wiseman J (Eds.), Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Nottingham University Press pp, 1999: 111-145.
[58] Oba M, Allen M S. Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1999, 82: 589.
[59] Colenbrander V F, Noller C H, Grant R J. Effect of fiber content and particle size of alfalfa silage on performance and chewing behavior[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1991, 74: 2681-2690.
[60] Hansen W P, Otterby D E, Linn J G et al. Influence of synchronizing protein and starch degradation in the rumen on nutrient utilization and microbial synthesis[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1991, 74: 1361-1369.
[61] Weiss W P, Shockey W L. Value of orchardgrass and alfalfa silages fed with varying amounts of concentrates to dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1991, 74: 1933-1946.
[62] Depies K K, Armentano L E. Particle replacement of alfalfa fiber with and non-structural carbohydrates on lactation and ruminal function[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1995, 76: 1324.
[63] Bernard L, Chaise J P, Baumont R, Poncet C. The effect of physical form of orchard grass hay on the passage of particulate matter through the rumen of sheep[J]. Anim Sci, 2000, 78: 1338-1354.
[64] Fernandez I, Michalet-Doreau B. Effect of maturity stage and choping length of maize silage on particle size reduction in dairy cows[J]. Anim Res, 2002, 51: 445-454.
[65] Junck B, Tafaj M, Zebeli Q et al. Influence of particle size of grass silage fed in TMR on passage rate and digesta volume in high-yielding dairy cows[J]. Proc Soc Nutr Physiol, 2005, 14: 139.
[66] Owens F N, Secrist D S, Hill W J et al. Acidosis in cattle :A review[J]. Anim Sci, 1998, 76: 275-286.
[67] Marie Krause K, Garrett R O. Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2006, 126: 215-236.
[68] Mertens D R. Physically effective NDF and its use in dairy rations explored[J]. Feed stuffs, 2000, 10: 11-14.
[69] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Altering Physically Effective Fiber Intake Through Forage Proportion and Particle Length: Chewing and Ruminal pH[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2007, 90: 2826-2838.
[70] Bhandari S K, Ominski K H, Wittenberg K M et al. Effects of Chop Length of Alfalfa and Corn Silage on Milk Production and Rumen Fermentation of Dairy Cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2007, 90: 2355-2366.
[71] Sairanen Auvo, Khalili Hannele, Virkaja¨rvi Perttu. Concentrate supplementation responses of the pasture-fed dairy cow[J]. Livestock Sci, 2006, 104: 292-302.
[72] Zebeli Q, Tafaj M, Junck B et al. Evaluation of the response of ruminal fermentation and activities of nonstarch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes to particle length of corn silage in dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2008b, 91: 2388-2398.
[73] Allen M S. Relationship between ruminal Fermentation and the requirement for physically effective fiber[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 1447.
[74] Einarson M S, Plaizier J C, Wittenberg K M. Effects of barley silage chop length on productivity and rumen conditions of lactating dairy cows fed a total mixed ration[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2004, 87(9): 2987-2996.
[75] Gray G M. Starch digestion and absorption in nonruminants[J]. J Nutr, 1992, 122: 172.
[76] Bal M A, J G Coors, A R D S. Impact of the maturity of com for use as silage in the diets of dairy cows on intake, digestion, and milk production[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 2497-2503.
[77] Schwab C R, Shaver K J, Shinners J G et al. Processing and chop length effects in brown-midrib corn silage on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2001, 85: 613-623.
[78] Krause K M, Combs D K. Effects of forage particle size and grain fermentability in midlactation cows.I. Milk production and diet digestibility[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2002b, 85: 1947-1957.
[79]张巧娥.苜蓿和玉米青贮的切割长度对奶牛产奶量和瘤胃发酵的影响[J].畜牧与饲料科学, 2008, 1: 9.
[80]贺鸣. TMR中粗饲料不同颗粒大小对干奶牛咀嚼行为和瘤胃发酵的影响[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2005.
[81] Kung L, Sheperd A C, Smagala A M et al. The effect of preservatives based on propionic acid on fermaentation and aerobic stability of corn silage and a totle mixed ration[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1998, 81: 1322-1330.
[82] Le Liboux S, Peyraud J L. Effect of forage particle size and feeding frequencyon fermentation patterns and sites and extent ofdigestion in dairy cows fed mixed diets[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 1999, 76: 297-319.
[83] Krause K M, Comb D K, Beauchemin K A. Effects of forage particle size and grain fermentability in midlactation cows.I.Milk production and diet digestibility[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2002a, 85: 1936-1946.
[84]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第2版)[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社. 2003.
[85] Gherardi S G, Kellaway R C, Black J L. Effect of forage particle length on digesta load, packing density and voluntary feed intake by sheep[J]. Aust J Agric Res, 1992, 43: 1321-1336.
[86] Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Chewing activities and milk proaucnon of dairy cows fed alfalfa as hay silage, or dried cubes or silage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1997, 80: 324-333.
[87] Soita H W, Fehr M, Christensen D A et al. Effects of barley silage of different theoretical cut length on digestion kinetics in ruminants[J] Can J Anim Sci, 2002, 82: 207-213.
[88] Kononoff P J, Mustafa A F, Christensen D A et al. Effects of barley silage particle length and effective fiber on yield and composition of milk from dairy cows[J]. Anim.Sci, 2000, 80: 749-752.
[89] Krause K M, Combs D K. Effects of forage particle size, forage source, and grain fermentability on performance and ruminal pH in midlactation cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 86: 1382-1397.
[90] Soita H W, Christensen D A, Jim A. Influence of particle size on the effectiveness of the fiberin barley silage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2000, 83: 2295-2300.
[91] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Physically effective fiber: method of determination and effects on chewing,ruminal acidosis,and digestion by dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2006, 89(7): 2618-2633.
[92] Asadi Alamoutia A, Alikhania M, Ghorbania G R et al. Effects of inclusion of neutral detergent soluble fibre sources in diets varying in forage particle size on feed intake, digestive processes, and performance of mid-lactation Holstein cows[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2009, 154: 9-23.
[93] Alende M, Depetris G J, Di Marco O N et al. Performance, chewing activity, and ruminal parameters in yearling beef steers fed early-harvested sorghum silage: Effect of chop length and wheat straw addition[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2009, 154: 125-133.
[94] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Increasing the Physically Effective Fiber Content of Dairy Cow Diets May Lower Efficiency of Feed Use[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2006, 89: 2694-2704.
[95] Teimouri Y A, Valizadeh R, Naserian A et al. Effects of alfalfa particle size and specific gravity on chewing activity, digestibility, and performance of Holstein dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2004, 87(11): 3912-3924.
[96] Leonardi C, Giannico F, Armentano L E. Effect of water addition on selective consumption(sorting)of dry diets by dairy cattle[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2005, 88: 1043- 1049.
[97] Plaizier J C, Krause D O, Gozho G N et al. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows:The physiological causes, incidence and consequences[J]. J Veteri, 2009, 176: 21-31.
[98] Zebeli Q, Tafaj M, Steingass H et al. Effects of Physically Effective Fiber on Digestive Processes and Milk Fat Content in Early Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Total Mixed Rations[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2006, 89: 651-668.
[99] Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A.Altering Physically Effective Fiber Intake Through Forage Proportion and Particle Length:Digestion and Milk Production[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2007, 90: 3410-3421.
[100] Zebeli Q, Ametaj B N, Junck B et al.Maize silage particle length modulates feeding patterns and milk composition in loose-housed lactating Holstein cows[J]. Livestock Sci, 2009, 124: 33-40.
[101] Penner G B, Yu P, Christensen D A. Effect of replacing forage or concentrate with wet or dry distillers’grains on the productivity and chewing activity of dairy cattle[J].Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2009,153: 1-10.
[102] Zebeli Q, Mansmann D, Steingass H et al. Balancing diets for physically effective fibre and ruminally degradable starch: A key to lower the risk of sub-acute rumen acidosis and improve productivity of dairy cattle[J]. Livestock Sci, 2010, 127: 1-10.
[103] Wilson J R, Mertens D R. Cell wall accessibility and cell structure limitations to microbial digestion offorage[J]. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 251-259.
[104]娜仁花.乳尿素氮(MUN)检测在奶牛生产中的指导意义[J].中国奶牛, 2008, (12): 27-29.
[105]王佳堃.稻草预处理后亚细胞结构及其理化特性变化规律研究[D].浙江大学, 2006.
[106] Engels Ferdinand M, Jung Hans-Joachim G. Alfalfa stem tissues: Impact of lignification and cell length on ruminal degradation of large particles[J]. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 2005, 120: 309-321.
[107] Akin D E, Borneman W S. Role of rumen fungi in fiber degradation[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1990, 73: 3023-3032.
[108] Liu D, Liu J X, Zhu S L et al. Histological investigation of tissues and cell wall of rice straw influenced by pretreatment with different chemicals and rumen degradation[J]. Anim Feed Sci, 2005, 14: 373-387.
[109] Cheng K J, McAllister T A. Compartmentation in the rumen. In: Hobson P N, Stewart C S ed The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Lindon:Blackie Academic&Professional, 1997.
[110] Hong B J, Broderick G A, Walgenbach R P. Effect of chemical conditioning of alfalfa on drying rate and nutrient digestion in ruminants[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1988, 71: 1851-1859.
[111] Grncarevic M, Radler F. The effect of wax component on cuticular transpiration-model experiments [J]. Planta, 1967, 75: 23-27.