四个桂花品种对大气污染抗性生理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究以生长状况相近、冠幅60cm、基茎1.5cm左右的年生日香桂(‘Rixianggui')、速生金桂(‘Sushengjingui')、早银桂('Zaoyingui')、早红桂('Zaohonggui')扦插苗为研究对象,采用简易静态熏气室法对四个桂花品种进壬SO_2(2.5mg/m~3、5mg/m~3、7.5mg/m~3)和NO_2(1.2mg/m~3、2.4mg/m~3、3.6mg/m~3)熏气和人工扬尘处理,以比较四个品种间抗污染能力。调查、分析经SO_2和NO_2处理后植株受害程度、症状类型、敏感性和显症时间等,再通过测定与植物抗性密切相关的叶绿素含量、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性、过氧化物酶(POD)活性、过氧化氧酶(CAT)活性、丙二醛(MDA)含量、脯氨酸含量等动态变化,分析这些生理生化反应与污染气体浓度、处理时间和植物抗性的相互关系。
     结果表明:
     1.四个桂花品种在粉尘处理试验中叶片无明显伤害症状,各项抗性指标在对照水平波动,差异不显著,表明本试验中扬尘处理对几种参试桂花品种无明显影响。
     2.四个桂花品种SO_2处理的整体伤害症状最先出现在中上部:NO_2处理的整体伤害症状最先出现在中下部:SO_2处理和NO_2处理的单片叶伤害伤害症状有一定的相似性,典型症状表现为叶脉间出现界限分明的不规则;黑褐色坏死斑,而日香桂在NO_2处理中呈褐色坏死斑;四个桂花品种对SO_2和NO_2敏感性差异较大,高浓度处理出现症状时间差异显著。早红桂为高抗品种,第12 d出现伤害症状:日香桂为中抗品种,第9 d出现伤害症状;速生金桂和早银桂最敏感,第6 d即可见伤害症状。
     3.四个桂花品种在SO_2试验过程中以及日香桂和速生金桂在NO_2处理过程中叶绿素总量均先上升再下降。在NO_2处理过程中,早红桂和早银桂叶绿素含量先降低,然后回升。四个品种在SO_2处理过程中和NO_2低浓度处理过程中叶绿素a/b值均下降,早红和日香桂在NO_2处理中叶绿素a/b大于对照,速生金桂和早银桂在NO_2高浓度处理时a/b值大于对照。
     4.四个桂花品种SOD和POD活性随着处理时间的增加均先上升后下降,相同处理不同品种SOD和POD活性下降的时间和幅度均有不同。早红桂比对照的活性增加比率幅度明显高于速生金桂和早银桂。CAT活性在两种气体处理下都下降,且随处理浓度增加和时间延长而活性下降的幅度加大,不同品种间降幅明显不同,早红桂降幅始终没超过20%,而早银桂和速生金桂在高浓度处理下降幅超过50%,品种间差异显著,降幅与抗性呈负相关。
     5.四个品种经SO_2和NO_2胁迫处理后,MDA含量都有上升。四个品种在处理前6 d MDA含量增加比较缓慢。随着熏气时间的延长和处理浓度的增大,MDA的含量逐渐增加,膜脂过氧化程度逐渐增大。抗性品种MDA含量上升幅度显著小于敏感品种。
     6.四个桂花品种体内脯氨酸含量均有增加,随处理浓度的增大和处理时间的延长,积累量也增多。抗性品种早红桂含量上升持续时间长,上升幅度大,在超过伤害值域后降幅小,与之相反,抗性较弱的早银桂含量上升幅度较小,后期出现含量下降的现象,且与叶片伤害症状形成对应。
     7.由四个桂花品种对SO_2和NO_2对两种气体抗性隶属度平均值得到的综合抗污染能力排序:早红桂>日香桂>速生金桂>早银桂。将隶属度值与各指标作相关分析结果表明,POD活性、MDA含量和Pro含量三项指标与综合评定结果之间极显著相关(P<0.01),这三个指标可作为测定桂花品种抗性的关键指标。SOD活性和CAT与综合评定结果之间存在显著相关关系(P<0.05),这三个指标可作为测定四个桂花品种抗性的可靠指标。
     8.症状观察记录综合分析所得四个桂花品种的抗性排序与抗性生理指标综合分析所得抗性排序完全吻合,表明采用高浓度污染气体处理植物,通过观察其伤害症状及症状出现的早晚来评价植物抗性,操作简单、省时省力、结果准确可靠,是一种简单而行之有效的抗性植物筛选方法。
     9.早红桂和日香桂在两种气体不同浓度处理下均表现出极强的抗性,能在污染较为严重区域正常生长。速生金桂和早银桂在高浓度处理下表现欠佳,但在中的浓度下仍能表出较强抗性,能在一般污染环境中正常生长。试验所选四个桂花品种在现代城市环境中具有极高的抗大气污染能力;是十分值得推广应用的优良的园林香化、绿化和美化树种。
Potted cuttings of four cultivars of four years of Osmanthus fragrans of 'Rixianggui', 'Susheng jingui','Zaoyingui' and'Zaohonggui' with similar growth conditions,canopy diameter about 60cm,base diameter about 1.5cm were treated by dust and fumigated by sulfur dioxide(2.5mg/m~3、5mg/m~3、7.5mg/m~3) and nitrogen dioxide(1.2mg/m~3、2.4mg/m~3、3.6mg/m~3) in a special designed fumigation equipment to compare the anti-pollution capacity of the four cultivars.The damage,injured symptom,sensitivity and time of injured symptom came out were investigated and analysed.The dynamic changes of content of chlorophyll,activities of SOD,POD and CAT,content of MDA and proline which closely related to plant resistance were tested.The relationships of physiological and biochemical response between pollutan concentrations,processing time and plant resistance were analysed.The main results are as the followings.
     1.The four cultivars of Osmanthus fragrans's leaves had no obvious injury symptom by dust,the physiological resistance indicators were waved at the level of check and had no significant difference.It shown that the four cultivars treated by dust had no significant effect.
     2.The four cultivars of Osmanthus fragrans's overall injury symptom first to appear in the upper part of the cuttings fumigated by sulfur dioxide and first to appear in the lower part fumigated by nitrogen dioxide.The injury symptom of single leaf had a certain similarity fumigated by SO_2 and NO_2.Irregular dark brown necrotic spot with clear boundaries between the nerves was the typical injury symptom.But the necrotic spots color of 'Rixianggui' was brown when fumigated by NO_2.The four cultivars had a comparatively different sensitivity to SO_2 and NO_2,the time of injured symptom came out in high concentrations had significant difference.'Zaohonggui' has high resistance;injured symptom came out at 12~(th) day.'Rixianggui' has middling resistance;injured symptom came out at 9~(th) day.'Susheng jingui'and 'Zaoyingui'wre most sensitive,injured symptom came out at 6~(th) day.
     3.The content of chlorophyll first increasing then decreasing when the four cultivars fumigated by SO_2 and 'Rixianggui'and'Sushengjingui' fumigated by NO_2.The content of chlorophyll first decreasing then came back when 'Zaohonggui'and'Zaoyingui' fumigated by NO_2.When the four cultivars fumigated by SO_2 and low concentration of NO_2 the chlorophyll a/b ratio all decreased,'Zaohonggui'and 'Rixianggui" fumigated by NO_2 the chlorophyll a/b ratio higher than CK,"Sushengjingui' and'Zaoyingui" fumigated by high concentration of NO_2 the chlorophyll a/b ratio also higher than CK.
     4.The four cultivars' SOD and POD activity with the increase in processing time were first increased and then decreased,the decline of SOD and POD activity with different cultivars of the same treat have different time and amplitude.The increase rate amplitude of 'Zaohonggui' to CK was significantly higher than that of 'Sushengjingui' and'Zaoyingui'.CAT activity under the two gases fumigate was fallen,and with the increasing of concentration and time the extension of the decrease in activity increased, decrease amplitude between the cultivars were obviously different,'Zaohonggui' never drop more than 20%,'Zaoyingui'and 'Sushengjingui' decrease more than 50%when fumigated by high concentration,between cultivars had decrease amplitude significant differences,decline was negative correlated with the resistance.
     5.Fumigated by SO_2 and NO_2,the four cultivars' MDA content were increased,the MDA content increased slowly in the fist six days.With the extension of fumigation time and concentration,MDA content increased gradually,the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation increases.' The increase MDA content of resistant cultivars were significantly less than the sensitive cultivars.
     6.The proline content of four cultivars increased,with the increasing of concentration and fumigates time,the accumulation also increased.The proline content of resistant varietiy of 'Zaohonggui' keepd a long increase time and large increase amplitude,and in a small decline beyond the injuries range.In contrast,weak resistant varietiy 'Zaoyingui' increases smaller and the content was decreased at later period.When the content was decreased,the injury symptom appeared.
     7.Comprehensive evaluation of the resistance of the four cultivars to SO_2 and NO_2 made by subordination value,The resistance of the four cultivars from strong to weak is as the followings:'Zaohonggui'>'Rixianggui'>'Susheng jingui'>'Zaoyingui'.Correlation analysis result of subordination value and indexes shows that POD activity,MDA content and the Pro content very significantly correlation with comprehensivee assessment(P<0.01),These three indicators can be used as key determination indicators of resistance of Osmanthus fragrans cultivars.CAT and SOD activity between the comprehensive evaluation of the results,there was a significant correlation(P<0.05),these three indicators can be measured as four cultivars of Osmanthus fragrans reliable indicator of resistance.
     8.The resistance order made by comprehensive analysis of observed symptom from four cultivars of Osmanthus fragrans and comprehensive analysis of physiological resistance indexes were exactly the same.It shown that by using high concentrations of polluted gas to fumigate plants and observing their injury symptom and injury symptom appeared time to evaluate their resistance which simple operation,save time and manpower,resulting in accurate and reliable,is a simple and effective method for screening of resistant plants.
     9.'Zaohonggui' and 'Rixianggui' fumigated by different concentrations of SO_2 and NO_2 both have shown strong resistance,they can growth normally in severe pollution regions.Even 'Sushengjingui'and'Zaoyingui' fumigated by high concentration pollution gases had not growth as well as medium and low concentrations,but also shown strong resistance,they can growth normally in slight pollution regions.The selected four cultivars of Osmanthus fragrans in this test have very high capacity of anti-air pollution in modern urban environment,they were extremely worthy of promotion and application as excellent trees to make landscape fragrant,green and beauty.
引文
Ann Marie Odasz-Albrigtsen,Hans Tommervik,Patrick Murphy.Decreased photosynthetic efficiency in plant species exposed to multiple airborne pollutants along the Russian-Norweigain border[J].Canadian Journal of Botany,2000,78:1021-1033
    Gerald J Holmes,Jonathan R Schultheis.Sensitivity of watermelon cultigens to ambient ozone in North Carolina[J].Plant Disease,2003,87:428-434
    J Garty,O Tamir,I Hassid,A Eshel,etal.Photosynthesis,chlorophyll integrity,and spectral reflectance in lichens exposedto air pollution[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2001,30:884-893
    JC Lee,KC Steiner,JW Zhang,JM Skelly.Heritability of ozone sensitivity in open-pollinated families of black cherry(Prunus serotina Ehrh.)[J].Forest Science,2002,48:111-117
    Luna C M,Gonzalez C A,et al.Oxidative damage caused by an excess of copper in oat leaves[J].Plant Cell Physiol,1994,35:11-15
    SilbersteinL,Siegel EZ,Siegel SM Mukhtar A GalunM.Comparative studies on Xanthoria parietina,a pollution-resistant lichen and Rarralina duriaei,asensitive pecies Ⅱ[J].Evaluation of possible air pollution-protection mechanisms Lichenologist,1996,28(4):367-383
    Tripathi,B.D.&Tripathi,A.Foliar injury and leaf diffusive resistance of rice and white bean in response to sulfur dioxide and ozone singly and in combination[J].Environmental Pollution,1992,75(3):265-268
    Zhang H Q(赵海泉),Hong F S(洪法水).The changes of activity of protective enzymes in wheat seedling under Hg stress[J].Agro-Environ Protection(农业环境保护),1998,17(1):20-21
    敖惠修,夏汉平.大气污染与草坪植物选择[J].广东园林,1999,2:42-43
    卞咏梅,陈树元.二氧化硫对植物细胞膜透性的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,1982,(41):41-44
    曹洪法,刘厚田,舒俭民等.植物对SO_2的反应[J]环境科学,1985,6(6):59-65
    曹洪法.我国大气污染及其对植物的影响[J].生态学报,1990,10(1):7-12
    陈军,杨威.锦州市大气污染现状及控制措施[J].辽宁城乡环境科技,2007,27(1):48-50
    陈由强.渗透胁迫对花生幼叶活性氧伤害和膜脂过氧化作用的影响[J].中国油料作物学报,2000,22(1):53-56
    丛者福.SO_2污染空气影响下树木叶片叶绿素含量的动态变化[J].新疆农业大学学报,1998,(40):297300
    丁菡,胡海波.城市大气污染与植物修复[J].南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,5(2)84-88
    杜忠.兰州市主要绿化植物对大气污染的生理生态反应[学位论文].南州,南州交通大学,2007
    付晓萍,田大伦.酸雨对植物的影响研究进展[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21,(4):23-28
    傅柳松,吴方正.酸雨对植物生长的影响[J].环境污染与防治,1993,15(1):22-25
    勾晓华,王勋陵.氟化氢对植物叶片中的SOD酶活力和MDA含量的影响[J].西北植物学报,1995,15(5):71-76
    郝再彬.苍晶,徐仲.值物生理实验[M].哈尔滨工业大学出版社,2004:115-116
    何冰等.干早胁迫对甘薯叶片质膜透性及抗氧化酶类的影响[J].广西农业大学学报,1997,16(4):287-291
    胡迪琴,苏行.广州地区酸雨对植物的影响及损失估算[J].生态科学,1999,19,(1):25-29
    胡丁猛,孙明高,王太明.SO_2对三种园林绿化苗木叶片膜脂过氧化和保护酶的影响[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,36(2):175-180
    胡羡聪,张德强,孔国辉.人气SO_2氟化物对植物生理生态指标的影响[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2003,11(4),372-378
    江行玉,赵可夫.植物重金属伤害及其抗性机理[J].应用与环境生物学报,2001,7(1):92-99
    蒋高明.大气污染指示树种的研究[J].城市环境与城市生态,1992,5(4):40-45
    金明红,冯宗炜.臭氧对冬小麦时片膜保护系统的影响[J].生态学报,2000,20(3):444-447
    孔国辉,余清发,易敬度等.98种园林树种对氯气的反应和抗性的研究[J].生态学报,1984,4(1)21-33
    李海亮,赵庆芳,王秀春,等.兰州市大气污染对绿化植物生理特性的影响[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(1):55-60
    李嘉钰,殷长寿.绿化树种对臭氧的反应和相对抗性[J].林业科技通讯,1983,9:22-24
    李庆杰.大气污染对植物的影响与对策[J].岱宗学刊,2000,3:45-46
    李彦慧,周怀军,杨敏生,等.廊坊杨苗期的抗旱性研究[J],西北林学院学报,2004,19(1):27-31
    李振国,吴有梅,刘愚,等.植物对二氧化硫的反应和抗性研究Ⅶ:SO_2熏气对小麦叶片过氧化物酶的影响[J].植物生理学报,1981,7(4):363-370
    李振国刘愚,吴有梅,等.植物对二氧化硫的反应和抗性研究--Ⅲ.植物接触三氧化硫和应激乙烯的产生[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,1980,6(1).47-55
    廖飞勇,何平,谢瑛.SO_2对植物光合作用影响的研究进展[J].经济林研究2003,21(3):85-87
    刘荣坤.二氧化硫对擅物光和色素的伤害机理[J].生态学进展,1989,6(2):102-109
    刘天兵,冯宗炜.植物SOD活性变化与其抗污能力的关系[J].环境污染与防治,1997,19(1):12-13
    刘霞,李海梅.园林植物滞尘效应的研究[J].北方园艺,2007,(8):73-76
    刘艳菊,丁辉.植物对大气污染的反应与城市绿化[J].植物学通报,2001,18(5):577-586
    鲁敏,李英杰.部分园林植物对大气污染物吸收净化能力的研究[J].山东建筑工程学院学报,2002,17(2):45-49
    罗立新.镉胁迫对小麦叶片中超氧阴离子自由基的积累[J].环境科学学报,1998,18,(5):495-499
    马树华,王庆成,李亚藏.汽车尾气污染对四种北方阔叶树苗木膜脂过氧化和保护酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报.2004,15(12):2330-2336
    彭剑涛.几种园林绿化植物对二氧化硫和氟化氢污染的生理反应[学位论文].贵州,贵州大学.2004:40-41
    彭新凯,胡朝辉.汽车尾气污染及控制[J].中国标准化,2001.5:10-11
    平措.我国城市大气污染现状及综合防治对策[J].环境科学与管理,2006,31(1):18-21
    齐泽民,王玄德,宋光煜.酸雨对植物影响的研究进[J].展世界科技研究与发展,2004,26,(2):36-41
    沈晓悦,国冬梅.我国汽车尾气排放与控制[J].环境科学动态,1998,4:4-8
    时双喜,杨义飞,李萌.汽车尾气污染的危害及控制[J].哈尔滨建筑大学学报,1999,32(2):35-39
    史佑海.四川桂花品种资源调查与桂花的园林应用研究[学位论文].南京,南京林业大学,2004
    舒俭民,曹洪法.低浓度SO_2长期暴露对菜豆生长和产量的影响[J].中国环境科学,1987,5:9-12
    舒俭民,刘连贵,高映新,等.低浓度SO_2对小麦生长的影响[J].农业环境保护,1988,7(3):16-18
    苏行,胡迪琴,林植芳.广州市大气污染对两种绿化植物叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(5):599-604
    孙存华,李扬,贺鸿雁.藜对干早胁迫的生理生化反应[J].生态学报,2005,25(10):2556-2561
    汪小飞,史佑海,王芳.四川桂花品种资源调查及开发利用[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,24:26-29
    王宇.植物与粉尘的关系[J].中学生物教学,2000,5:44-45
    卫涛涛.陈畅,侯京武,等.一氧化氮损伤神经细胞线粒体并诱导细胞凋亡[J].科学通报,1999,44(17):1867-1871
    尉万聪,李润植.一氧化氮在植物抗病反应中的信号作用[J].生物工程进展,2001,21(1):25-28
    温学,孔国辉,彭长连.植物监测大气污染及其抗性[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2003,11(4):348-357
    吴东亮译.原料、熟料和水泥厂粉尘中的重金属含量[J].国外建材科技,1998,19(2)42-44
    吴丽英.二氧化硫对作物光合强度和呼吸强度影响的研究[J].农业环境保护,1989,8(2):9-12
    熊庆娥.植物生理学实验教程.四川:四川科学出版社,2003,55-56
    徐玉梅.二氧化硫对园林植物的急性伤害反应和外源物质的抗硫效应[学位论文].山西,山西农业大学,2005
    扬玉珍.植物受氟化物污染后糖代谢及叶汁pH值的变化研究[J].河南大学学报,1995,29(1):95-97
    杨建伟.大气污染对植物的影响[J].南都学坛(自然科学版),1996,3:102-104
    杨金亮.四川和贵州酸雨区林场马尾松病虫害的调查研究[J].环境科学,1991,12(1):33-37
    杨小波.城市生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,129-147
    杨玉珍,刘玉萃.大气氟污染对数目光和作用特性的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,1993,27(4):340-343
    殷京生,孙日.城市环境现代化:一个被忽视的问题[J].经济时刊,1998,7:16-17
    余叔文,谭常,杨惠东,等.植物对二氧化硫的反应与抗性研究--Ⅱ.质膜透性变化和二氧化硫伤害[J]植物生理学报,1979(5):403-409
    俞飞,徐瘩钢,秦文娟.SO_2、NO_2及其复合物青菜抗坏血酸含量的影响[J].环境科学,1992,14(1):64-67
    苑中显.中国能源状况与发展对策[J].中国冶金,2005,15(5):7-10
    曾明颖.四川省桂花品种调查与分类研究[J].西南科技大学学报,2006,21(1):113-119
    张纯.不同作物对氟纯氢急性伤害的生理生化抗性研究[学位论文].山西,山西农业大学,2005
    张继娟.魏世强.我国城市大气污染现状与特点[J].四川环境,2006,25(3):104-109
    张玲玲.11种园林树本对汽车尾气和SO_2的抗性生理研究[学位论文].河北,河北农业大学,2006
    张明勤,马安东.大气环境污染物质对植物的影响[J].洛阳农专学报,1994,14(2):47-49
    张晓何,韩素梅.植物脯氢酸的变化与亚硫酸伤害的关系[J].辽宁大学学报,1995,22(2):53-56
    张文贤.重金属对大麦毒性的研究[J].环境科学学报,1997,17,(2):199-205
    赵志光,谭玲玲,王锁民,等.植物一氧化氮(NOI研究进展[1][J].植物学通报,2002,19(6):659-665
    周军英.SO_2和NO_2复合污染对番茄超氧化物歧化酶及叶片伤害的影响[J].中国环境科学,1993,13(6):429-423
    朱广廉.植物生理学实验[M].北京,北京大学出版社,1990:242-244

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700