64层螺旋CT低剂量仿真结肠镜对猪结肠模拟息肉的实验研究
|
摘要
目的:探讨64层螺旋CT低剂量仿真结肠镜在理想状态下,不同剂量扫描对不同大小的猪结肠模拟息肉的检出率,并评价二维、三维重建及二维和三维联合观察对模拟息肉检出的敏感性。
方法:猪结肠15段,每段25cm,彻底清洁后,每段制作6枚息肉样模型,3-4.9mm、5-9.9mm、10-15mm的模拟息肉各两枚,用空气扩张,并浸入水中,采集50mA、20mA、12mA的影像,CT剂量加权指数(CTDIw)分别为3.83mGy、1.53mGy、0.93mGy,采用轴位像+MPR图像、CTC、2D+3D观察病变,采用成组设计多个样本比较的秩和检验和多个样本两两比较的秩和检验评价图像质量。不同剂量各种后处理方法对模拟息肉的检出率及不同后处理方法三种剂量对模拟息肉的检出率,进行多个相关样本的卡方检验。
结果:
1.不同剂量采集的1mm显示层厚的轴位像及MPR影像质量存在统计学意义,而CTC影像质量差异无统计学意义。
2.不同管电流50mA、20mA、12mA其CT仿真结肠镜成像对≥10mm模拟息肉检出率均为100%,对5-9.9mm模拟息肉检出率分别为96.7%、96.7%、93.3%,对<5mm模拟息肉检出率为86.7%、83.3%、80%,不同剂量对同组模拟息肉的检出率无统计学意义。不同管电流50mA、20mA、12mA其轴位+MPR成像对≥10mm模拟息肉检出率均为100%,对5-9.9mm模拟息肉检出率分别为93.3%、66.7%、60%,对<5mm模拟息肉检出率为70%、50%、36.7%,不同剂量对≥10mm组模拟息肉的检出率无统计学意义,对5-9.9mm组,<5mm组模拟息肉均存在统计学意义。不同管电流50mA、20mA、12mA其2D+3D联合观察对≥10mm模拟息肉检出率均为100%,对5-9.9mm模拟息肉检出率分别为96.7%、96.7%、93.3%,对<5mm模拟息肉检出率为86.7%、83.3%、80%。随着管电流由50mA减低致20mA、12mA CTDIw(mGy)分别减少60.1%、75.7%。
3.使用50mA管电流采集图像,轴位+MPR、CTC、2D+3D不同观察方法对≥10mm息肉检出率均为100%,对5-9.9mm息肉检出率分别为93.3%、96.7%、96.7%,对<5mm息肉检出率为70%、86.7%、90%,使用20mA、12mA管电流采集图像也显示2D+3D观察方法对不同大小的息肉检出率最高,CTC次之,轴位+MPR对于小息肉的检出率下降。
结论:
1.在模拟的理想状态下64层螺旋CT12mA低剂量仿真结肠镜对模拟息肉的检出有较高的敏感性,对模拟息肉的显示没有明显影响,而X线辐射剂量较50mA剂量减少了约4/5。
2.各种不同观察方法中,二维和三维图像联合观察可提高息肉检出率,CTC检出率略低,轴位+MPR对于小息肉的检出率明显下降。低剂量仿真结肠镜将为结肠病变普查提供广阔前景。
Objective: The objective of this experimental study was to study the ability of CT virtual colonography by 64 multislice spiral CT using low X-ray dose scanning technique in the diction of polyps under ideal imaging conditions. The different dose scanning to the different size's pig colon simulation polyp's detection rate, and appraises two dimensional, the three dimensional reconstruction and two dimensional and the three dimensional union observation to simulates the sensitivity which the polyp picks out.
Methods: fifteen segments of 25cm-long porcine colon were explanted and thoroughly cleaned. 6 stimulated polyps(2 lesions,2-4.9mm; 2 lesions,5-9.9mm; 2 lesions,10-15mm)were placed in every segment of 25cm-long thoroughly cleaned porcine colon that was distended with air and submerged in a water phantom.15 segments were scanned with 64 detector-row MSCT scanner using 50mA、20mA、12mA parameters, and the same time tracked record the CT dose index(CTDIw) 3.83mGy、1.53mGy、0.93mGy respectively. The data were reviewed using axial+MPR、CTC、combined 2D/3D approach. Statistically, Adopted a number of design group Samples of the rank and number of samples tested and compared the February 2 rank and test evaluation of image quality. After dealing with different doses of various methods to simulate the polyp detection rate and after the treatment of three different doses of simulated polyps detection rate, the number of card-related samples to test.
Results:
1.There were statistical differences in image quality between the axial images with 1mm slice thickness and MPR acquired by using different X-ray dose techniques. There were no statistical differences in image quality the images of CTC acquired by using various X-ray dose acquisition techniques respectively.
2.The detection rates of 50mA、20mA、12mA CTC images for stimulated polyps with different dimensions were as follows:100% for the ones with diameters of≥10mm,with all three dose,96.7%、96.7%、93.3% for the ones of 5-9.9mm in diameter and 86.7%、83.3%、80% for those of <5mm in diameter by using 50mA、20mA、12mA.There was no statistical differences in detection rates to stimulated polyps in same group with different X-ray dose. Different from the current 50mA、20mA、12mA its axial + MPR imaging≥10mm stimulated polyp detection rate was 100 percent, the simulation of 5-9.9mm polyp detection rate was 93.3%、66.7%、60%, to the <5mm simulation polyp detection rate is 70%、50%、36.7%, different doses of≥10mm group simulated polyps detection rate was not significant, 5-9.9 mm group, <5mm group simulated polyps there are significant. Different tube electric current 50mA, 20mA, 12mA its 2D+3D union observation to≥10mm the simulation polyp detection rate is 100%, to the 5-9.9mm simulation polyp detection rate respectively is 96.7%、96.7%、93.3%, to the <5mm simulation polyp detection rate is 86.7%、83.3%、80%. With tube current declining, comparing to 50mA, the CTDIw(mGy) of 20mA、12mA was decreased by 60.1%、75.7%.
3. Using the 50mA tube electric current gather the image, axial +MPR, CTC, the 2D+3D different observation method for≥10mm the polyp detection rate is 100%, to the 5-9.9mm polyp detection rate respectively is 93.3%、96.7%、96.7%, <5mm polyp detection rate of 70%、86.7%、90%, 2D+3D observation methods were the most sensitive technique for showing polyps of different size, while CTC was in the second place. MPR is less sensitive for demonstrating polyps with less than 5mm in diameter.
conclusion:
1.Under ideal imaging conditions, sensitivity was higher for detecting polyps using 64 detector-row MSCT colonography scan technology with 12mA low X-ray dose, to simulated polyps showed no obvious effects, and X-ray radiation dose than 50mA dose decreased by about 4/5.
2. Various methods of observation, two dimensional and the three dimensional image union observation may raise the polyp detection rate, the CTC detection rate is slightly low, axial + MPR small polyp detection rate decreased significantly. Low-dose simulation colonoscopy for colon lesions census provided broad prospects.
方法:猪结肠15段,每段25cm,彻底清洁后,每段制作6枚息肉样模型,3-4.9mm、5-9.9mm、10-15mm的模拟息肉各两枚,用空气扩张,并浸入水中,采集50mA、20mA、12mA的影像,CT剂量加权指数(CTDIw)分别为3.83mGy、1.53mGy、0.93mGy,采用轴位像+MPR图像、CTC、2D+3D观察病变,采用成组设计多个样本比较的秩和检验和多个样本两两比较的秩和检验评价图像质量。不同剂量各种后处理方法对模拟息肉的检出率及不同后处理方法三种剂量对模拟息肉的检出率,进行多个相关样本的卡方检验。
结果:
1.不同剂量采集的1mm显示层厚的轴位像及MPR影像质量存在统计学意义,而CTC影像质量差异无统计学意义。
2.不同管电流50mA、20mA、12mA其CT仿真结肠镜成像对≥10mm模拟息肉检出率均为100%,对5-9.9mm模拟息肉检出率分别为96.7%、96.7%、93.3%,对<5mm模拟息肉检出率为86.7%、83.3%、80%,不同剂量对同组模拟息肉的检出率无统计学意义。不同管电流50mA、20mA、12mA其轴位+MPR成像对≥10mm模拟息肉检出率均为100%,对5-9.9mm模拟息肉检出率分别为93.3%、66.7%、60%,对<5mm模拟息肉检出率为70%、50%、36.7%,不同剂量对≥10mm组模拟息肉的检出率无统计学意义,对5-9.9mm组,<5mm组模拟息肉均存在统计学意义。不同管电流50mA、20mA、12mA其2D+3D联合观察对≥10mm模拟息肉检出率均为100%,对5-9.9mm模拟息肉检出率分别为96.7%、96.7%、93.3%,对<5mm模拟息肉检出率为86.7%、83.3%、80%。随着管电流由50mA减低致20mA、12mA CTDIw(mGy)分别减少60.1%、75.7%。
3.使用50mA管电流采集图像,轴位+MPR、CTC、2D+3D不同观察方法对≥10mm息肉检出率均为100%,对5-9.9mm息肉检出率分别为93.3%、96.7%、96.7%,对<5mm息肉检出率为70%、86.7%、90%,使用20mA、12mA管电流采集图像也显示2D+3D观察方法对不同大小的息肉检出率最高,CTC次之,轴位+MPR对于小息肉的检出率下降。
结论:
1.在模拟的理想状态下64层螺旋CT12mA低剂量仿真结肠镜对模拟息肉的检出有较高的敏感性,对模拟息肉的显示没有明显影响,而X线辐射剂量较50mA剂量减少了约4/5。
2.各种不同观察方法中,二维和三维图像联合观察可提高息肉检出率,CTC检出率略低,轴位+MPR对于小息肉的检出率明显下降。低剂量仿真结肠镜将为结肠病变普查提供广阔前景。
Objective: The objective of this experimental study was to study the ability of CT virtual colonography by 64 multislice spiral CT using low X-ray dose scanning technique in the diction of polyps under ideal imaging conditions. The different dose scanning to the different size's pig colon simulation polyp's detection rate, and appraises two dimensional, the three dimensional reconstruction and two dimensional and the three dimensional union observation to simulates the sensitivity which the polyp picks out.
Methods: fifteen segments of 25cm-long porcine colon were explanted and thoroughly cleaned. 6 stimulated polyps(2 lesions,2-4.9mm; 2 lesions,5-9.9mm; 2 lesions,10-15mm)were placed in every segment of 25cm-long thoroughly cleaned porcine colon that was distended with air and submerged in a water phantom.15 segments were scanned with 64 detector-row MSCT scanner using 50mA、20mA、12mA parameters, and the same time tracked record the CT dose index(CTDIw) 3.83mGy、1.53mGy、0.93mGy respectively. The data were reviewed using axial+MPR、CTC、combined 2D/3D approach. Statistically, Adopted a number of design group Samples of the rank and number of samples tested and compared the February 2 rank and test evaluation of image quality. After dealing with different doses of various methods to simulate the polyp detection rate and after the treatment of three different doses of simulated polyps detection rate, the number of card-related samples to test.
Results:
1.There were statistical differences in image quality between the axial images with 1mm slice thickness and MPR acquired by using different X-ray dose techniques. There were no statistical differences in image quality the images of CTC acquired by using various X-ray dose acquisition techniques respectively.
2.The detection rates of 50mA、20mA、12mA CTC images for stimulated polyps with different dimensions were as follows:100% for the ones with diameters of≥10mm,with all three dose,96.7%、96.7%、93.3% for the ones of 5-9.9mm in diameter and 86.7%、83.3%、80% for those of <5mm in diameter by using 50mA、20mA、12mA.There was no statistical differences in detection rates to stimulated polyps in same group with different X-ray dose. Different from the current 50mA、20mA、12mA its axial + MPR imaging≥10mm stimulated polyp detection rate was 100 percent, the simulation of 5-9.9mm polyp detection rate was 93.3%、66.7%、60%, to the <5mm simulation polyp detection rate is 70%、50%、36.7%, different doses of≥10mm group simulated polyps detection rate was not significant, 5-9.9 mm group, <5mm group simulated polyps there are significant. Different tube electric current 50mA, 20mA, 12mA its 2D+3D union observation to≥10mm the simulation polyp detection rate is 100%, to the 5-9.9mm simulation polyp detection rate respectively is 96.7%、96.7%、93.3%, to the <5mm simulation polyp detection rate is 86.7%、83.3%、80%. With tube current declining, comparing to 50mA, the CTDIw(mGy) of 20mA、12mA was decreased by 60.1%、75.7%.
3. Using the 50mA tube electric current gather the image, axial +MPR, CTC, the 2D+3D different observation method for≥10mm the polyp detection rate is 100%, to the 5-9.9mm polyp detection rate respectively is 93.3%、96.7%、96.7%, <5mm polyp detection rate of 70%、86.7%、90%, 2D+3D observation methods were the most sensitive technique for showing polyps of different size, while CTC was in the second place. MPR is less sensitive for demonstrating polyps with less than 5mm in diameter.
conclusion:
1.Under ideal imaging conditions, sensitivity was higher for detecting polyps using 64 detector-row MSCT colonography scan technology with 12mA low X-ray dose, to simulated polyps showed no obvious effects, and X-ray radiation dose than 50mA dose decreased by about 4/5.
2. Various methods of observation, two dimensional and the three dimensional image union observation may raise the polyp detection rate, the CTC detection rate is slightly low, axial + MPR small polyp detection rate decreased significantly. Low-dose simulation colonoscopy for colon lesions census provided broad prospects.
引文
[1] Lynne LH. Preventing colon cancer: Screening and Early Detection Save Lives [J].FDA consumer,2000,34 (6):14-19
[2] Hara AK, Johnson CD, Maccarty RL, et al. CT colonography: single-versus multi-detector row imaging[J]. Radiology, 2001, 219 (2): 461-465
[3] Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, et al. Low-dose CT of the lung: prelimary observa- tions [J]. Radiology, 1990, 175 (3): 729-731
[4] Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital [J]. AJR, 2001, 176 (2): 303-306
[5] Hein E, Rogalla P, Klingebiel R, et al. Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuseswith eye lens protection:effect on image quality and radiation dose [J]. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12(7): 1693-1696
[6] Caroline K, Denis T, Viviane D, et al. Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT [J]. Radiology, 2004, 232(1):164-172
[7]马巍,赵贵辛,王啸等,16-MDCT仿真内窥镜检查猪结肠模拟息肉的实验研究[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2007,18(2):126-129
[8] Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia[J].JAMA, 2004, 291(4), 1713 -1719
[9] Vogt C, Cohnen M, Beck A, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2004, 60(2): 201-209
[10] Graser A, Wintersperger BJ, Suess C et al. Dose Reduction and Image Quality in MDCT Colonography Using Tube Current Modulation[J]. AJR 2006,187(9): 695-701
[11] Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopyfor detection[J]. Radiology, 2002, 224(1):383-392
[12] Cohnen M, Vogt C, Aurich V, et al. Multi-slice CT-colonography in low-dose technique:preliminary results[J]. Rofo 2002, 174:835-838
[13] Iannaccone R,Laghi A,Catalano C,et al.Detection of Colorectal Lesions: Lower-Dose Multi–Detector Row Helical CT Colonography Compared with Conventional Colonoscopy[J].Radiology, 2003, 229(3):775-781
[14] Van GRE, Venema HW, Serlie IWO, et al. CT Colonography at Different Radiation Dose Levels : Feasibility of Dose Reduction[J].Radiology, 2002, 224(1): 25-33
[15]柳澄.充分发挥64层螺旋CT的优势[J].医学影像学杂志,2005,12(8):1145-1147
[16]刘凯,柳澄,陈青华,等.颞骨高分辨率CT各向同性的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(3):96-100
[17]张云亭,袁聿德.医学影像检查技术学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005,94-97
[18] Mang TG, Prokop CS, Maier A, et al. Detectability of Small and Flat Polyps in MDCT Colonography Using 2D and 3D Imaging Tools: Results from a Phantom Study[J] .AJR, 2005, 185(12):1582-1589
[19] Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, et al .Primary 2D Versus Primary 3D Polyp Detection at Screening CT Colonography[J].AJR, 2007, 189(6): 1451-1456
[20] Munikrishnan V, Gillams AR, Lees WR, et al. Prospective study comparing multislice CT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2003, 46:1384-1390
[21] Rottgen R, Schroder RJ, Lorenz M, et al. CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases[J].Rofo 2003,175:1384-1391
[22] Zalis ME,Hahn PF.Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography[J].AJR,2001,176 (3): 646-648
[23] Jensch S, Gelder RE, Florie J. Performance of Radiographers in the Evaluation of CT Colonographic Images[J] AJR 2007,188 (3):249-255
[24] Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. Computer-Assisted Reader Software Versus Expert Reviewers for Polyp Detection on CT Colonography[J]. AJR,2006, 186 (3): 696-702
[25] Baker ME, Bogoni L, Obuchowski NA, et al. Computer-aided Detection of Colorectal Polyps: Can It Improve Sensitivity of Less-Experienced Readers? Preliminary Findings[J].Radiology, 2007,245(1):140-149
[26] Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et a1.Optimization of CT colonography technique:perspective trial in 180 patients[J].Radiology,2000,216(3):704-711
[27] Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Kim DH. Screening for Colorectal Neoplasia with CT Colonography: Initial Experience from the 1st Year of Coverage by Third-Party Payers[J]. Radiology, 2006, 241:417-425
[28] Macari M, Bini EJ. CT Colonography: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? [J]. Radiology ,2005, 237(3): 819-833
[29] Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, et al. Pitfalls in Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography: ASystematic Approach[J]. RadioGraphics, 2007, 27(2): 431-454
[30] Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, et al. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium[J]. AJR 2005,184(1): 1836-184
[1] Lynne LH. Preventing colon cancer: Screening and Early Detection Save Lives [J].FDA consumer,2000,34(6):14-19
[2] Fletcher JG,Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et a1.Optimization of CT colonography technique:perspective trial in 180 patients[J].Radiology,2000,216(6):704-711
[3] Fischbach R,WesslingJ.CT Colonography Using Multi2 slice Computed Tomography [J].Electromedica,2001,69(2):116-119
[4] Yee J,Akerkar GA,Hung RK,et al.Colorectal Neoplasia:Performance Characteristics of CT Colonography for etection in 300 Patients[J].Radiology, 2001,219(3):685-692
[5] Iannaccone R,Laghi A,Catalano C,et al.Detection of Colorectal Lesions: Lower-Dose Multi–Detector Row Helical CT Colonography Compared with Conventional Colonoscopy[J].Radiology,2003,229(3):775-781
[6] Van GRE, Venema HW, Serlie IWO, et al. CT Colonography at Different Radiation Dose Levels : Feasibility of Dose Reduction[J].Radiology,2002,224(1):25-33
[7] Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB, Karadi C. Display modes for CT colonography Part II Blinded comparison of axial CT andvirtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopicvolume—rendered studies[J].Radiology,1999, 212(1):203-212
[8] Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A et al. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease[J]. Radiology, 2002,222(2):337-345
[9] McFarland EG, Brink JA. Helical CT colonography(virtual colonoseopy):The Challenge That Exists Between Advancing Technology and Generalizability [J].AJR,1999,173(3):549-559
[10] Rottgen R. Schroder RJ, Lorenz M,et a1.CT-colonography with the 16 slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases[J].Rofo,2003,175(10):1384-1391
[11] Choi D, Jin Lee S, Ah Cho Y, et a1.Bowel wall thickening in patients with Crohn’s disease:CT patterns and correlation with inflammatory activity[J].Clin Radiol,2003,58(1):68-74
[12] Mako EK, Mester AR.Tarjan Z. et a1.Enteroclysis and spiral CT examination in diagnosis and evaluation of small bowel Crohn’s disease[J].EJR,2000,35(3):168-175
[13] Heuschmid M, Luz O, Schaefer JF. et a1.Computed tomographic colonography(CTC):Possibilities and limitations of clinical applicationin colorectal polyps and cancer[J].Technol Cancer Restreat.2004,3(2):20l-207
[14] Chintapalli KN, Chopra S, Ghiatas AA, et al. Diverticulitis versus colon cancer: differentiation with helical CT findings[J]. Radiology,1999,210(2):429–435
[15] Veldkamp R, Gholghegaei M, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery(EAES) [J].Surg Endosc,2004, 18(8):1163-1185
[16] Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy [J]. Radiology. 2002, 223(3):615-619
[17] Matsuki M, Okuda J, Yoshikawa S, et al. Clinical application of three-dimensional imaging with multislice CT for laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J].Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi,2003,63(4):154-159
[18] Ng CS, Doyle TC, Courtney HM, et al. Extracolonic findings in patients undergoing abdomino-pelvic CT for suspected colorectal carcinoma in the frail and disabled patient[J].Clin Radiol 2004,59(5):421-430
[19] Takada M, Kashiwagi R.3D-CT diagnosis for ingested foreign bodies[J].Am J Emerg Med,2000,18(2):192-193
[20] Mendelson RM. Forbes GM. Computed tomography colonography(virtual colonoscopy):review[J].Australas Radiol,2002,46(1):1-12
[21] Munikrishnan V, Gillams AR, Lees WR, et al. Prospective study comparing multisliceCT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2003,46:1384-1390
[22] Rottgen R, Schroder RJ, Lorenz M, et al. CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases[in German].Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2003,175:1384-1391
[23] Hara AK,Johnson CD,MacCarty RL,et al.CT colonography:single-versus multi-detector row imaging[J].Radiology 2001,219(2):461-465
[24] Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al.Computer-Assisted Reader Software Versus Expert Reviewers for Polyp Detection on CT Colonography[J]. AJR,2006,186(3):696-702
[25] Vogt C, Cohnen M, Beck A, Vom Dahl S, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2004, 60(2): 201-209
[26] Macari M, Bini EJ, CT Colonography: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? [J].Radiology 2005, 237(3):819-833
[27] Marytina MM, Vassihos R. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography[J].Seminars in Ultrasound,CT,MRI.2001,22:420-424
[28] Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al.Colorectal cancer:role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy[J].Radiology.2002,223(2):615-6l9
[29] Zalis ME, Hahn PF. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography[J].AJR,2001,176(3):646-648
[2] Hara AK, Johnson CD, Maccarty RL, et al. CT colonography: single-versus multi-detector row imaging[J]. Radiology, 2001, 219 (2): 461-465
[3] Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, et al. Low-dose CT of the lung: prelimary observa- tions [J]. Radiology, 1990, 175 (3): 729-731
[4] Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital [J]. AJR, 2001, 176 (2): 303-306
[5] Hein E, Rogalla P, Klingebiel R, et al. Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuseswith eye lens protection:effect on image quality and radiation dose [J]. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12(7): 1693-1696
[6] Caroline K, Denis T, Viviane D, et al. Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT [J]. Radiology, 2004, 232(1):164-172
[7]马巍,赵贵辛,王啸等,16-MDCT仿真内窥镜检查猪结肠模拟息肉的实验研究[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2007,18(2):126-129
[8] Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia[J].JAMA, 2004, 291(4), 1713 -1719
[9] Vogt C, Cohnen M, Beck A, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2004, 60(2): 201-209
[10] Graser A, Wintersperger BJ, Suess C et al. Dose Reduction and Image Quality in MDCT Colonography Using Tube Current Modulation[J]. AJR 2006,187(9): 695-701
[11] Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopyfor detection[J]. Radiology, 2002, 224(1):383-392
[12] Cohnen M, Vogt C, Aurich V, et al. Multi-slice CT-colonography in low-dose technique:preliminary results[J]. Rofo 2002, 174:835-838
[13] Iannaccone R,Laghi A,Catalano C,et al.Detection of Colorectal Lesions: Lower-Dose Multi–Detector Row Helical CT Colonography Compared with Conventional Colonoscopy[J].Radiology, 2003, 229(3):775-781
[14] Van GRE, Venema HW, Serlie IWO, et al. CT Colonography at Different Radiation Dose Levels : Feasibility of Dose Reduction[J].Radiology, 2002, 224(1): 25-33
[15]柳澄.充分发挥64层螺旋CT的优势[J].医学影像学杂志,2005,12(8):1145-1147
[16]刘凯,柳澄,陈青华,等.颞骨高分辨率CT各向同性的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(3):96-100
[17]张云亭,袁聿德.医学影像检查技术学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005,94-97
[18] Mang TG, Prokop CS, Maier A, et al. Detectability of Small and Flat Polyps in MDCT Colonography Using 2D and 3D Imaging Tools: Results from a Phantom Study[J] .AJR, 2005, 185(12):1582-1589
[19] Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, et al .Primary 2D Versus Primary 3D Polyp Detection at Screening CT Colonography[J].AJR, 2007, 189(6): 1451-1456
[20] Munikrishnan V, Gillams AR, Lees WR, et al. Prospective study comparing multislice CT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2003, 46:1384-1390
[21] Rottgen R, Schroder RJ, Lorenz M, et al. CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases[J].Rofo 2003,175:1384-1391
[22] Zalis ME,Hahn PF.Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography[J].AJR,2001,176 (3): 646-648
[23] Jensch S, Gelder RE, Florie J. Performance of Radiographers in the Evaluation of CT Colonographic Images[J] AJR 2007,188 (3):249-255
[24] Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. Computer-Assisted Reader Software Versus Expert Reviewers for Polyp Detection on CT Colonography[J]. AJR,2006, 186 (3): 696-702
[25] Baker ME, Bogoni L, Obuchowski NA, et al. Computer-aided Detection of Colorectal Polyps: Can It Improve Sensitivity of Less-Experienced Readers? Preliminary Findings[J].Radiology, 2007,245(1):140-149
[26] Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et a1.Optimization of CT colonography technique:perspective trial in 180 patients[J].Radiology,2000,216(3):704-711
[27] Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Kim DH. Screening for Colorectal Neoplasia with CT Colonography: Initial Experience from the 1st Year of Coverage by Third-Party Payers[J]. Radiology, 2006, 241:417-425
[28] Macari M, Bini EJ. CT Colonography: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? [J]. Radiology ,2005, 237(3): 819-833
[29] Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, et al. Pitfalls in Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography: ASystematic Approach[J]. RadioGraphics, 2007, 27(2): 431-454
[30] Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, et al. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium[J]. AJR 2005,184(1): 1836-184
[1] Lynne LH. Preventing colon cancer: Screening and Early Detection Save Lives [J].FDA consumer,2000,34(6):14-19
[2] Fletcher JG,Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et a1.Optimization of CT colonography technique:perspective trial in 180 patients[J].Radiology,2000,216(6):704-711
[3] Fischbach R,WesslingJ.CT Colonography Using Multi2 slice Computed Tomography [J].Electromedica,2001,69(2):116-119
[4] Yee J,Akerkar GA,Hung RK,et al.Colorectal Neoplasia:Performance Characteristics of CT Colonography for etection in 300 Patients[J].Radiology, 2001,219(3):685-692
[5] Iannaccone R,Laghi A,Catalano C,et al.Detection of Colorectal Lesions: Lower-Dose Multi–Detector Row Helical CT Colonography Compared with Conventional Colonoscopy[J].Radiology,2003,229(3):775-781
[6] Van GRE, Venema HW, Serlie IWO, et al. CT Colonography at Different Radiation Dose Levels : Feasibility of Dose Reduction[J].Radiology,2002,224(1):25-33
[7] Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB, Karadi C. Display modes for CT colonography Part II Blinded comparison of axial CT andvirtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopicvolume—rendered studies[J].Radiology,1999, 212(1):203-212
[8] Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A et al. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease[J]. Radiology, 2002,222(2):337-345
[9] McFarland EG, Brink JA. Helical CT colonography(virtual colonoseopy):The Challenge That Exists Between Advancing Technology and Generalizability [J].AJR,1999,173(3):549-559
[10] Rottgen R. Schroder RJ, Lorenz M,et a1.CT-colonography with the 16 slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases[J].Rofo,2003,175(10):1384-1391
[11] Choi D, Jin Lee S, Ah Cho Y, et a1.Bowel wall thickening in patients with Crohn’s disease:CT patterns and correlation with inflammatory activity[J].Clin Radiol,2003,58(1):68-74
[12] Mako EK, Mester AR.Tarjan Z. et a1.Enteroclysis and spiral CT examination in diagnosis and evaluation of small bowel Crohn’s disease[J].EJR,2000,35(3):168-175
[13] Heuschmid M, Luz O, Schaefer JF. et a1.Computed tomographic colonography(CTC):Possibilities and limitations of clinical applicationin colorectal polyps and cancer[J].Technol Cancer Restreat.2004,3(2):20l-207
[14] Chintapalli KN, Chopra S, Ghiatas AA, et al. Diverticulitis versus colon cancer: differentiation with helical CT findings[J]. Radiology,1999,210(2):429–435
[15] Veldkamp R, Gholghegaei M, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery(EAES) [J].Surg Endosc,2004, 18(8):1163-1185
[16] Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy [J]. Radiology. 2002, 223(3):615-619
[17] Matsuki M, Okuda J, Yoshikawa S, et al. Clinical application of three-dimensional imaging with multislice CT for laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J].Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi,2003,63(4):154-159
[18] Ng CS, Doyle TC, Courtney HM, et al. Extracolonic findings in patients undergoing abdomino-pelvic CT for suspected colorectal carcinoma in the frail and disabled patient[J].Clin Radiol 2004,59(5):421-430
[19] Takada M, Kashiwagi R.3D-CT diagnosis for ingested foreign bodies[J].Am J Emerg Med,2000,18(2):192-193
[20] Mendelson RM. Forbes GM. Computed tomography colonography(virtual colonoscopy):review[J].Australas Radiol,2002,46(1):1-12
[21] Munikrishnan V, Gillams AR, Lees WR, et al. Prospective study comparing multisliceCT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2003,46:1384-1390
[22] Rottgen R, Schroder RJ, Lorenz M, et al. CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases[in German].Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2003,175:1384-1391
[23] Hara AK,Johnson CD,MacCarty RL,et al.CT colonography:single-versus multi-detector row imaging[J].Radiology 2001,219(2):461-465
[24] Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al.Computer-Assisted Reader Software Versus Expert Reviewers for Polyp Detection on CT Colonography[J]. AJR,2006,186(3):696-702
[25] Vogt C, Cohnen M, Beck A, Vom Dahl S, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2004, 60(2): 201-209
[26] Macari M, Bini EJ, CT Colonography: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? [J].Radiology 2005, 237(3):819-833
[27] Marytina MM, Vassihos R. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography[J].Seminars in Ultrasound,CT,MRI.2001,22:420-424
[28] Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al.Colorectal cancer:role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy[J].Radiology.2002,223(2):615-6l9
[29] Zalis ME, Hahn PF. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography[J].AJR,2001,176(3):646-648