TLR2mAb、TLR4mAb对DSS诱导的小鼠溃疡性结肠炎的干预作用及对肠道菌群的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的观察TLR2及TLR4单克隆抗体对葡聚糖硫酸钠(dextran sulfate sodium,DSS)诱导的小鼠急性期溃疡性结肠炎的干预作用及对肠道菌群的影响。
     方法50只25g左右的雄性BALB/c小鼠分为A-E五组:正常对照组(A)、模型组(B)、TLR2mAb干预组(C)、TLR4mAb干预组(D)、TLR2mAb和TLR4mAb共同干预组(E),每组10只。A组小鼠饮用蒸馏水,B-E组小鼠饮用水代以5%DSS水溶液以产生急性期溃疡性结肠炎,造模开始的同时,C-E组小鼠每隔48h分别予以TLR2mAb(10μg)、TLR4mAb(10μg)、TLR2mAb(10μg)+TLR4mAb(10μg)腹腔内注射,A、B两组小鼠予生理盐水腹腔内注射作为对照,期间观察小鼠的疾病活动指数(disease activity index, DAI)。造模及干预7d后处死所有小鼠,HE染色观察各组小鼠的结肠炎症情况,并以盲法进行结肠组织病理学评分(histopathological score, HS)。取结肠标本,使用Realtime-PCR法检测各组结肠粘膜中TLR2mRNA、TLR4mRNA的表达。留取小鼠盲肠内粪便对大肠杆菌、双歧杆菌及乳酸杆菌进行培养并比较各菌群菌落计数(Colony forming units, CFU)的变化。
     结果(1)与A组相比,B组的DAI及HS显著增高(DAI.9.70±2.406 vs 0.50±0.707,P<0.01;HS:16.50±2.991 vs 6.40±3.273,P<0.01);C、D组与B组相比DAI及HS差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);E组的DAI及HS明显低于B组(DAI:5.70±3.498vs 9.70±2.406,P<0.05;HS:9.50±3.308 vs 16.50±2.991,P<0.01)。(2)小鼠结肠粘膜TLR2mRNA表达:B组TLR2mRNA表达明显高于A组(P<0.01);C、D、E干预组TLR2mRNA表达明显低于B组(P<0.05),与A组无明显差异(P>0.05)。小鼠结肠粘膜TLR4mRNA表达:B组TLR4mRNA表达明显高于A组(P<0.05);C、D、E干预组TLR4mRNA表达明显低于B组(P<0.01,P<0.05,P<0.01),与A组无明显差异(P>0.05)。(3)肠道菌群:A组大肠杆菌数量较少,B-E四组大肠杆菌均明显生长(与A组相比P<0.05),C-E组大肠杆菌与B组相比数值有所下降,但无统计学差异(P>0.05);B组双歧杆菌及乳酸杆菌数量均明显少于A组及C-E组(P<0.05),使用TLR2mAb、TLR4mAb干预后,C-E组双歧杆菌及乳酸杆菌数量上升,与A组相比无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。
     结论TLR2mAb及TLR4mAb联合干预可以减轻葡聚糖硫酸钠诱导的小鼠急性期溃疡性结肠炎的疾病活动指数及病理炎症改变,具有预防作用。使用两种单抗单独或联合干预均可以显著降低结肠粘膜TLR2及TLR4的表达。两种单克隆抗体均能明显提高小鼠肠道内双歧杆菌及乳酸杆菌的菌群数量,但对大肠杆菌数量无明显影响,且两抗体同时干预时对肠道菌群结构的改善未见显著协同作用。
Objective To evaluate the prevention effects of TLR2mAb and TLR4mAb on DSS-induced colitis in mice.
     Methods Fifty healthy male BALB/c mice (SPF level) purchased from an experimental animal center (Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China), all weighing about 25 g, were randomly assigned into five groups:the normal control group (group A), the UC model group (group B), TLR2mAb intervention group (group C), TLR4mAb intervention group (group D) and TLR2mAb+TLR4mAb intervention group (group E). Group B to group E were given 5.0% DSS solution as drinking water for 7 days to induce acute intestinal inflammation while the normal control group drank distilled water freely. Groups C, D and E respectively received TLR2mAb (10μg), TLR4mAb(10μg) and TLR2mAb (10μg)+TLR4mAb(10μg) injection intraperitoneally once on days 1,3,5 and 7. Group A and B received a normal sodium injection intraperitoneally as control. All mice were killed on the eighth day. The daily disease activity index (DAI) assessment was carried out in the process of modeling. The tissues were fixed with 10% neutral formalin, embedded in paraffin for blinded histological analysis. The mucosal mRNA expressions of TLR2 and TLR4 were analyzed by Realtime PCR. Fecal samples were obtained directly from the cecum and were serially diluted in Ringer diluent for incubation under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. After incubation, colonies were identified according to standard procedures.
     Results (1) The DAI score was the lowest in group A. In group B-E, DAI scores were higher than group A (P<0.01). Group B was the most different from group A. Groups C and D had relatively lower scores than group B, but there were no significant differences between each group (C/D vs B, P>0.05). Group E, with TLR2mAb+TLR4mAb intervention, showed a markedly lower score than group B (P<0.05). Compared with group A, group B showed a significant difference in HS(P<0.01). The inflammation was improved in groups C-E. Although HS seemed to be lower in group C and D than group B, there were no significant differences between each group (P>0.05). Notably, the inflammation was significantly improved in group E with a lower HS than group B (P<0.01). (2) In mice with DSS-induced colitis, expressions of both TLR2 and TLR4 in colonic epithelial cells were much higher than normal mice:group B was notably different from group A (TLR2:P<0.01; TLR4:P<0.05). Intervention with TLR2mAb or/and TLR4mAb could down-regulated their expressions to nearly the normal level (P>0.05). (3) Group A showed a considerable predominance of Lactobacillus spp and Bifidobacterium spp. Comparing with group A, group B showed a conspicuous increase of Escherichia coli and decrease of Lactobacillus spp(P<0.05) and Bifidobacterium spp(P<0.05). After being treated with TLR2mAb and TLR4mAb, Lactobacillus spp and Bifidobacterium spp in groups C, D and E increased noticeably to the normal level, and there was no statistical significance between every intervention groups and the normal control group (P>0.05). While counts of E. coli in group C-E were still nearly the same as that in group B (C/D/E vs B, P>0.05).
     Conclusion Intervention of TLR2mAb combined with TLR4mAb is effective in suppressing DSS-induced colitis in mice. Both TLR2mAb and TLR4mAb can increase counts of Lactobacillus spp and Bifidobacterium spp in DSS-induced colitis. While these interventions have less influence in reducing the count of E. coli.
引文
[1]Jiang XL, Cui HF. An analysis of 10218 ulcerative colitis cases in China. World J Gastroenterol,2002,8:158-161.
    [2]Toiyama Y, Araki T, Yoshiyama S, et al. The expression patterns of Toll-like receptors in the ileal pouch mucosa of postoperative ulcerative colitis patients. Surg Today,2006,36:287-90.
    [3]Richard Neil Fedorak, Levinus Albert Dieleman. Probiotics in the Treatment of Human Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol,2008,42(2):97-103.
    [4]Ailsa L. Hart, Andrew J. Stagg, Michael A. Kamm. Use of Probiotics in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Clin Gastroenterol,2003,36(2): 111-119.
    [5]Cooper HS, Murthy SN, Shah RS, et al. Clinicopathologic study of dextran sulfate sodium experimental murine colitis. Lab Invest,1993,69:238-49.
    [6]Marta Muzio, Alberto Mantovani. Toll-like receptors.Microbes and Infection,2000, 2:251-255.
    [7]Dogi CA, Galdeano CM, Perdigon G. Gut immune stimulation by non pathogenic Gram(+) and Gram(-) bacteria. Comparison with a probiotic strain. Cytokine, 2008,41(3):223-231.
    [8]O'Neill LAJ, Greene C. Signal transduction pathways activated by the IL-1 receptor family:ancient signaling machinery in mammals, insects, and plants. J Leukoc Biol,1998,63:650-657.
    [9]Baldwin AS Jr. Series introduction the transcription factor NF—κ B and human disease. J Clin Invest,2001,107:3-6.
    [10]Tak PP, Firestein GS. NF—κ B:A key role in inflammatory diseases. J Clin Invest,2001,107:7-11.
    [11]Waetzig GH, Seegert D, Rosenstiel P, et al. P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase is activated and linked to TNF-alpha signaling in inflammatory bowel disease. J Immunol,2002,168(10):5342-51.
    [12]GeorgH Waetzing, Dirk seegert, Philip Rosenstiel. P38 motogen-activated protein kinase is actived and linked to TNF-a signaling in inflammatory bowel disease. The Journal of Immunology,2002,168:5342.
    [13]Yi Liu, Zhijun Zhang, Lei Wang et al. TLR4 monoclonal antibody blockade suppresses dextran-sulfate-sodium-induced colitis in mice. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,2010,25(1):209-14.
    [14]Cario E, Podolsky DK. Differential alteration in intestinal epithelial cell expression of toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) and TLR4 in inflammatory bowel disease. Infect Immun,2000,68:7010-7.
    [15]Abreu MT, Vora P, Faure E, et al. Decreased expression of Toll-like receptor-4 and MD-2 correlates with intestinal epithelial cell protection against dysregulated proinflammatory gene expression in response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol,2001; 167(3):1609-1616.
    [16]Hausmann M, Kiessling S, Mestermann S, et al. Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 are up-regulated during intestinal inflammation. Gastroenterology,2002,122(7): 1987-2000.
    [17]Lemaitre B., Nicholas E., Michaut L.,et al. The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell,1996,86(6):973-83.
    [18]Medzhitov R., Preston-Hurlburt P., Janeway C.A. A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature,1997, 388(6640):394-7.
    [19]Hoebe K, Janssen E, Beutler B. The interface between innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Immunol.2004,5(10):971-974.
    [20]Inoue S, Matsumoto T, Iida M, et al. Characterization of cytokine expression in the rectal mucosa of ulcerative colitis:correlation with disease activity. Am J Gastroenterol,1999,94(9):2441-6.
    [21]Rachmilewitz D, Karmeli F, Shteingart S, et al. Immunostimulatory oligonucleotides inhibit colonic proinflammatory cytokine production in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis,2006,12:339-45.
    [22]Yamamoto T, Umegae S, Kitagawa T, et al. Systemic and local cytokine production in quiescent ulcerative colitis and its relationship to future relapse:A prospective pilot study. Inflamm Bowel Dis,2005,11:589-96.
    [23]Raddatz D, Bockemuhl M, Ramadori G. Quantitative measurement of cytokine mRNA in inflammatory bowel disease:Relation to clinical and endoscopic activity and outcome. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2005,17:547-57.
    [24]Blam ME, Stein RB, Lichtenstein GR. Integrating anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease:Current and future perspectives. Am. J. Gastroenterol,2001,96:1977-97.
    [25]van Assche G, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P. Mucosal Healing and Anti TNFs in IBD. Curr Drug Targets,2010,11 (2):227-33.
    [26]Cannom RR, Kaiser AM, Ault GT, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease in the United States from 1998 to 2005:has infliximab affected surgical rates? Am Surg, 2009,75(10):976-80.
    [27]Shananan F. Crohn's disease. Lancet,2002,359(9300):62-69.
    [28]Burke DA, Axon AT. Adhesive Escherichia coli in inflammatory bowel disease and infective diarrhea. BMJ,1988,297(6641):102-104.
    [29]Venturi P, Gionchetti P, Rizell F, et al. Impact on the composition of the faecal flora by a new probiotic preparation:Preliminary data on maintenance treatment of patients with ulcerative colotis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther,1999,13(8): 1103-1108.
    [30]Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol,1989,66:365-378.
    [31]O.C.Thompson-Chagoyan et al. Aetiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): Role of intestinal microbiota and gut-associated lymphoidse tissue immune response. Clinical Nutrition,2005,24:339-352.
    [32]Kruis W, Fric P, Pokrotnieks J, et al. Maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis with the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 is as effective as with standard mesalazine. Gut,2004,53:1617-1623.
    [33]Bibiloni R, Fedorak RN, Tannock GW, et al. VSL#3 probiotic-mixture induces remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol,2005,100: 1539-1546.
    [34]S Resta-Lenert, K E Barrett. Live probiotics protect intestinal epithelial cells from the effects of infection with enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC). Gut,2003,52: 988-997.
    [35]Rigby RJ, Hart AL, Kamm MA, et al. Differential production of IL-12 and IL-10 by colonic dendritic cells in response to bacterial stimuli. Gastroenterology,2002, 122:633.
    [36]Richard N. Fedorak. Understanding Why Probiotic Therapies Can be Effective in Treating IBD. J Clin Gastroenterol,2008,42(3):111-115.
    [37]Schlee M, Wehkamp J, Altenhoefer A, et al. Induction of human beta-defensin 2 by the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 is mediated through flagellin. Infect Immun,2007,75:2399-2407.
    [38]Blumberg RS, Saubermann LJ, Strober W. Animal models of mucosal inflammation and their relation to human inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Opin Immunol,1999,11(6):648-656.
    [39]Diebel LN, Liberati DM, Diglio CA, et al. Synergistic effects of Candida and Escherichia coli on gut barrier function. J Trauma,1999,47(6):1045-1051.
    [40]Podolsky DK. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med,2002,347(6):417-429.
    [41]Donnenberg MS. Pathogenic strategies of enteric bacteria. Nature,2000, 406(6797):768-774.
    [42]Neish AS, Gewirtz AT, Zeng H, et al. Prokaryotic regulation of epithelial responses by inhibition of I κ B-α ubiquitination. Science,2000,289(5484): 1560-1563.
    [1]Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals[J]. J Appl Bacteriol.1989;66:365-378.
    [2]O.C.Thompson-Chagoyan et al. Aetiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): Role of intestinal microbiota and gut-associated lymphoidse tissue immune response[J]. Clinical Nutrition.2005;24:339-352.
    [3]Puneet Gupta, Haikaeli Andrew, Barbara S. Kirschner, et al. Is Lactobacillus GG helpful in children with Crohn's disease? Results of a preliminary, open-label study[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.2000;31:453-457.
    [4]Guslandi M, Mezzi G, Sorghi M, et al. Saccharomyces boulardii in maintenance treatment of Crohn's disease[J]. Dig Dis Sci.2000;45:1462-1464.
    [5]Chermesh I, Tamir A, Reshef R, et al. Failure of Synbiotic 2000 to prevent postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease[J]. Dig Dis Sci.2007;52:385-389.
    [6]Gossum A, Dewit O, Louis E, et al. Multicenter randomized-controlled clinical trial of probiotics(Lactobacillus johnsonii, LAI)on early endoscopic recurrence of Crohn's disease after ileo-caecal resection[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis.2007;13(2): 135-142.
    [7]Kruis W, Fric P, Pokrotnieks J, et al. Maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis with the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 is as effective as with standard mesalazine[J]. Gut.2004;53:1617-1623.
    [8]Bibiloni R, Fedorak RN, Tannock GW, et al. VSL#3 probiotic-mixture induces remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis[J]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1539-1546.
    [9]Antonio Tursi. Balsalazide Plus High-potency probiotic preparation(VSL#3) in the treatment of acute mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis and uncomplicated diverticulitis of the colon [presentation]. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42(3):119-122.
    [10]Zocco MA, dal Verme LZ, Cremonini F, et al. Efficacy of Lactobacillus GG in maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:1567-1574.
    [11]Laake KO, Bjorneklett A, Aamodt G, et al. Outcome of four weeks'intervention with probiotics on symptoms and endoscopic appearance after surgical reconstruction with a J-configurated ileal-pouch-analan astomosis in ulcerative colitis[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol.2005;40:43-51.
    [12]Kuhbacher T, Ott SJ, Helwig U, et al. Bacterial and fungal microbiota in relation to probiotic therapy (VSL#3) in pouchitis[J]. Gut.2006;55:833-841.
    [13]S Resta-Lenert, K E Barrett. Live probiotics protect intestinal epithelial cells from the effects of infection with enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) [J]. Gut. 2003;52:988-997.
    [14]Karen Madsen, Anthony Cornish, Paul Soper, et al. Probiotic bacteria enhance murine and human intestinal epithelial barrier function[J]. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(3):580-591.
    [15]S Weston, A Halbert, P Richmond, et al. Effects of probiotics on atopic dermatitis:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Arch Dis Child 2005;90:892-897.
    [16]Neeta S. Ogden, Leonard Bielory. Probiotics:a complementary approach in the treatment and prevention of pediatric atopic disease[J]. Curr Opin Allergy Clin immunol.2005;5(2):179-184.
    [17]Ailsa L. Hart, Andrew J. Stagg, Michael A. Kamm. Use of probiotics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease [J]. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003;36(2):111-119.
    [18]Daniel Rachmilewitz, Kyoko Katakura, Fanny Karmeli, et al. Toll-like receptor 9 signaling mediates the anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics in murine experimental colitis [J]. Gastroenterology.2004;126(2):520-528.
    [1]饭田三雄(著),任常陵(译).缺血性肠炎的诊断与治疗.日本医学介绍,2003;24(11):516-517.
    [2]Leon D. Sanchez, Jason A. Tracy, David Berkoff, et al. Ischemic colitis in marathon runners:a case-based review. The Journal of Emergency Medicine,2006;30(3):321-326.
    [3]Park CJ, Jang MK, Shin WG, et al. Can we predict the development of ischemic colitis among patients with lower abdominal pain? Dis Colon Rectum,2007; 50(2):232-238.
    [4]Michel Huguier, Alain Barrier, Pierre Y,et al. Ischemic colitis. The American Journal of Surgery,2006;192:679-684.
    [5]王一鸣,熊毅敏,郑国荣,等.缺血性结肠炎的临床及内镜研究.中国内镜杂志,2008;14(7):710-712.
    [6]Marston A, Pheils MT, Thomas ML, et al. Ischemic Colitis. Gut,1966; 7 (1):1.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700