基于社会网络视角的高技术企业集群式成长机制研究
|
摘要
20世纪70年代以来,福特制模式越来越难以适应消费变化的要求,竞争的时空体系发生了巨大变化,传统的企业之间的单体竞争模式被企业网络之间的群体竞争模式所替代,逐渐形成了以合作竞争为基础的新格局,产业集群这种生产组织形式取得了优势。在以智力资源为首要依托的知识经济悄然兴起的背景下,高技术企业集群式成长的态势如火如荼,在世界经济版图上形成了亮丽景象。本研究针对目前我国高技术集群企业成长理论与实践研究相对滞后的现状,在对国内外现有相关研究成果分析基础上,以社会网络、内部智力资本、企业成长为基本研究要素,构建了基于社会网络视角的高技术企业集群式成长机制理论模型,并进行了实证研究。
论文以基于社会网络视角的高技术企业集群式成长机制为研究主题,在对高技术集群企业的社会网络、智力资本、企业成长等相关文献进行深入研究的基础上,归纳出本文的研究要素;通过对研究要素的内涵界定和维度分析,明确了要素之间的作用关系;以此借助理论推导,建构出高技术集群企业社会网络、内部智力资本和企业成长之间的关系模型,提出20条假设;并使用济南高新区齐鲁软件园高技术创业企业的问卷调研数据做实证分析,检验结果表明20条假设中有16条通过。最后,本研究对检验结果进行了讨论和展望,揭示了研究的理论价值和实践意义。
Fllowing the globalization of the economy the development of the high-tech industry with high- tech quantities and increasing competativites has been used to the key point of international compitation. High-tech Industry cluster has become the most successful model to develop the high-tech industry,and it is significant to promote technology advancement and the quality of economic growth. So in the last decade,there has been a widespread resurgence of interest in high-tech industry clusters.
During the study of high-tech industry cluster,a problem is deserved to consider why some high-tech Industries develop very well(such as Silicon Valley), but others not, what is the driving power of its development and where does this power come?
There is still no perfect explaination for those problems in theory. Through the review of current literature and development practice of high-tech industry cluster,we find such a clue:The ability to obtain the resources of the enterprise has close correlation to the social network,with the enterprise growth may relate the network angle from enterprise's society to carry on the explanation,the high-tech enterprise society network has the vital role regarding to the enterprise growth.Studying the relationship among social network,intellectual capital and growth of venture operating within high-tech industry cluster can open out the micro mechanism of venture clustered and resolve the driving power of high-tech industry venture.
Although certain theoretical and practical research on the innovation of high-tech industry cluster have been developed with plenty of achievement. The studies on the clustered-growth mechanism of high-tech need further research. So this paper builds the conceptual model of the clustered-growth mechanism of high-tech firms based on the social network, analyzes the relationship among them and points out hypotheses, examines the conceptual model and hypotheses through empirical analysis, discusses the empirical result and points out the significance in theory and in practice. This paper includes following parts.
Firstly,reviewing the relative literature about the social network,intellectual capital and the growth of venture and evaluating the contribution and shortage,summarizing the factors this paper will analyze later.
Secondly,building the conceptual model of social network,intellectual capital and growth of venture operating within high-tech industry cluster. Taking the current literature as references,this paper divides the social network into three dimensions:network centrality,network range and network intensity and divides internal intellectual into two dimensions:human capital and organize capital mainly divides the growth of venture into two dimensions:quantitative growth and qualitative growth. In this foundation,the paper proposes theoretical model between the essential factors.
Thirdly,based on the theoretical analysis, it puts forward twenty hypotheses about the relation of the society network characteristics of high-tech industry cluster, influence of the society network to the internal intelligence capital, relations of interior intelligence capital essential factor function within high-tech industry cluster, the interior intelligence capital of high-tech firms to the growth of enterprise.
Fourthly,theoretical model and hypotheses we put forward are tested by using AMOS software. The datas come from questionnaires of 68 software enterprises within Jinan software industry cluster. Results of the test indicate that the model is well supported and nineteen out of twenty hypotheses are supported.
Finally, a discussion is made on the test results, which further makes it clear that great importance of the research both in theory and in practice. We analyses the significance of hypotheses which are supported and the cause of hypotheses which are not supported according to the special development background of Chinese high-tech industry cluster. Then put forward to some advices about how to build cluster social capital, promote knowledge spillover and increase absorptive capacity of firms operating within high-tech industry cluster.
The basic conclusions of the dissertation are as follows:
The centrality of high-tech enterprises existences correlational dependence on network scope, the centrality of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on human capital, The centrality of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on organization capital, the scope of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on human capital, the scope of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on organization capital, High-tech enterprise network intensity existences correlational dependence on human capital, High-tech colony enterprise network intensity existences correlational dependence on organization capital. In high-tech enterprise, human capital existences correlational dependence on organization capital, In high-tech enterprise, organization capital existences correlational dependence on human capital, The centrality of high-tech enterprise network existences correlation dependence on the growth of the enterprise, The centrality of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on nature growth of enterprise. The of scope high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on the the measure of the growth of enterprise, the scope of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on nature growth of enterprise, High-tech enterprise network intensity existences correlational dependence on human capital, High-tech enterprise network intensity existences correlational dependence on organization capital, the human capital existence correlational dependence on the measure the growth of high-tech enterprise.
论文以基于社会网络视角的高技术企业集群式成长机制为研究主题,在对高技术集群企业的社会网络、智力资本、企业成长等相关文献进行深入研究的基础上,归纳出本文的研究要素;通过对研究要素的内涵界定和维度分析,明确了要素之间的作用关系;以此借助理论推导,建构出高技术集群企业社会网络、内部智力资本和企业成长之间的关系模型,提出20条假设;并使用济南高新区齐鲁软件园高技术创业企业的问卷调研数据做实证分析,检验结果表明20条假设中有16条通过。最后,本研究对检验结果进行了讨论和展望,揭示了研究的理论价值和实践意义。
Fllowing the globalization of the economy the development of the high-tech industry with high- tech quantities and increasing competativites has been used to the key point of international compitation. High-tech Industry cluster has become the most successful model to develop the high-tech industry,and it is significant to promote technology advancement and the quality of economic growth. So in the last decade,there has been a widespread resurgence of interest in high-tech industry clusters.
During the study of high-tech industry cluster,a problem is deserved to consider why some high-tech Industries develop very well(such as Silicon Valley), but others not, what is the driving power of its development and where does this power come?
There is still no perfect explaination for those problems in theory. Through the review of current literature and development practice of high-tech industry cluster,we find such a clue:The ability to obtain the resources of the enterprise has close correlation to the social network,with the enterprise growth may relate the network angle from enterprise's society to carry on the explanation,the high-tech enterprise society network has the vital role regarding to the enterprise growth.Studying the relationship among social network,intellectual capital and growth of venture operating within high-tech industry cluster can open out the micro mechanism of venture clustered and resolve the driving power of high-tech industry venture.
Although certain theoretical and practical research on the innovation of high-tech industry cluster have been developed with plenty of achievement. The studies on the clustered-growth mechanism of high-tech need further research. So this paper builds the conceptual model of the clustered-growth mechanism of high-tech firms based on the social network, analyzes the relationship among them and points out hypotheses, examines the conceptual model and hypotheses through empirical analysis, discusses the empirical result and points out the significance in theory and in practice. This paper includes following parts.
Firstly,reviewing the relative literature about the social network,intellectual capital and the growth of venture and evaluating the contribution and shortage,summarizing the factors this paper will analyze later.
Secondly,building the conceptual model of social network,intellectual capital and growth of venture operating within high-tech industry cluster. Taking the current literature as references,this paper divides the social network into three dimensions:network centrality,network range and network intensity and divides internal intellectual into two dimensions:human capital and organize capital mainly divides the growth of venture into two dimensions:quantitative growth and qualitative growth. In this foundation,the paper proposes theoretical model between the essential factors.
Thirdly,based on the theoretical analysis, it puts forward twenty hypotheses about the relation of the society network characteristics of high-tech industry cluster, influence of the society network to the internal intelligence capital, relations of interior intelligence capital essential factor function within high-tech industry cluster, the interior intelligence capital of high-tech firms to the growth of enterprise.
Fourthly,theoretical model and hypotheses we put forward are tested by using AMOS software. The datas come from questionnaires of 68 software enterprises within Jinan software industry cluster. Results of the test indicate that the model is well supported and nineteen out of twenty hypotheses are supported.
Finally, a discussion is made on the test results, which further makes it clear that great importance of the research both in theory and in practice. We analyses the significance of hypotheses which are supported and the cause of hypotheses which are not supported according to the special development background of Chinese high-tech industry cluster. Then put forward to some advices about how to build cluster social capital, promote knowledge spillover and increase absorptive capacity of firms operating within high-tech industry cluster.
The basic conclusions of the dissertation are as follows:
The centrality of high-tech enterprises existences correlational dependence on network scope, the centrality of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on human capital, The centrality of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on organization capital, the scope of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on human capital, the scope of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on organization capital, High-tech enterprise network intensity existences correlational dependence on human capital, High-tech colony enterprise network intensity existences correlational dependence on organization capital. In high-tech enterprise, human capital existences correlational dependence on organization capital, In high-tech enterprise, organization capital existences correlational dependence on human capital, The centrality of high-tech enterprise network existences correlation dependence on the growth of the enterprise, The centrality of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on nature growth of enterprise. The of scope high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on the the measure of the growth of enterprise, the scope of high-tech enterprise network existences correlational dependence on nature growth of enterprise, High-tech enterprise network intensity existences correlational dependence on human capital, High-tech enterprise network intensity existences correlational dependence on organization capital, the human capital existence correlational dependence on the measure the growth of high-tech enterprise.
引文
1 http://www.qilusoft.org/china/other/another/1.asp
[1]Adler P S, Kwon Seok-Woo. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(1): 17-40.
[2]Ahuja Gautam.Collaboration Networks,Structural Holes,and Innovation:A Longitudinal Study.Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45(3):425-456.
[3]Alavi M,Leidner D E.Knowledge management systems:issues,challenges,and benefits.Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 1999, (1):7-17.
[4]Albino, VA., Garavelli, C., Schiuma, Cue, Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts: the role of the leader firm, Technovation, 1999, 19: 53-63.
[5]Aldrich, H.E.& Reese, P R .Does Networking Pay Off? A Panel Study of Entrepreneurs in the Research Triangle in Churchill, S. & Birley, J. Doutriaux. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.Massachusetts: Wellesley 1993: 325-339
[6]Aldrich, Howard, Catherine Zimmer, and Trevor Jones. Small Business Still Speaks With the Same Voice: A Peplication of Survival. Sociological Review. 1986.34: 335-56.
[7]Alessandro Malipiero, Federico Munari and Maurizio Sobrero. Focal Firms as Technological Gatekeepers within Industrial Districts: Knowledge Creation and Dissemination in the Italian Packaging Machinery Industry. Paper presented to the DRUID Winter Conference. 2005.4.
[8]Andrade, G, Mitchell, M. and Stafford, E. New Evidence and Perspective on Megers' , Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2001, vol. 15, no. 2:103-120.
[9]Andrews, K..The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, III: Richard D. Irwin. 1971
[10]Antal, A.B.,Dierkes, M.and Hahner,K.Business in society: perceptions and principles in organizational learning. Journal of General Management, 1994, Vo1.20,No.2:55-77.
[11]Axelrod, R. & Cohen, M. D. Harnessing complexity. New York, Free Press. 1999.
[12]Bain, J. Industrial Organization. Whey, New York.1959.
[13]Bala Ramasamy, K.W. Goh, Matthew C.H. Yeung. Is Guanxi (relationship) a bridge to knowledge transfer? Journal of Business Research, 2006, 59(3): 130-139.
[14]Barabasi, L. & Albert, R., Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science,1999, 286: 509-512.
[15]Barney, J.B. Organization culture: Can it competitive advantage? . Academy of Management be a source of sustained Review, 1986. 11:656-665.
[16]Barney, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 1991.17 (l):99-120.
[17]Bartel,A.P.Productivity gains from the implementation of employee training programs. Industrial Relations, 1994,33:411-425.
[18]Baum, J.A.C., Calabrese, T.& Silverman, B.S. Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000(21): 267-294.
[19]Becattini G. The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion, in Pyke F., Becattini G.and W Sengenberger (Eds), Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990: 37-51.
[20]Becker, B. E. Gerhart, B. The import of human resource management on organization performance: progress and prospects, Academy of Management Journal,1996,39: 779-801
[21]Benson,C. and Lohnes, P.. Skill durable goods manufacturing. requirements and industrial training in Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 1959 (12):540-553.
[22]Best, M. The new competition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 1990.
[23]Beugelsdijk, S., Smulders, S. Bridging and bonding social capital: which type is good for economic growth, Center/Faculty of Economics, Tilburg University, working paper. 2003.
[24]Bontis, N. Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital, International Journal ofManagement Reviews, 2001,3(1):41-60.
[25]Bontis,N., Chua,W. and Richardson,S. Intellectual capital and the nature of business in Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2000,l(1): 85-100.
[26]Bontis N, Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study that Develops Measures and Models. Management Decision 1998.36(2):63-72.
[27]Borgatti, S.P. What Is Social Network Analysis?, 1998. http: // www. analytictech. com/networks/whatis.htm.
[28] Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, New York: Greenwood. 1986, 241-258.
[29]Brooking, A. Intellectual Capital: core assets for the third millennium enterprise. Thomeson Business Press. London, UK. 1996.
[30]Bresnahan,T.F., Brynjolfsson,E. and Hitt,L.M. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. 2002.
[31]Burt, R. S. Range. In S. S. Burt and M. J. Minor (Eds),Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 1983: 176 -194.
[32]Butt, R.S. Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception and Action. New York: Academic Press. 1982.
[33]Burt R. S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
[34]Camagni, R.Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives, London, Belhaven Press. 1991.
[35]Capello Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in Hi-Tech Milieu: Learning Versus Collective Learning Progress, Regional Studies, 1999, 33: 352-365.
[36]Castillo J. A Note on the Concept of Tacit Knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2002, 11(1): 46-57
[37]Churchill,G. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal ofMarketing Research, 1979.l6(1):64-73.
[38]Churchill, N.C., Lewis, V.L., The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review.1983.61 (3), 30-50.
[39]Clayton M Christensen, Michael Overdorf.Meeting The Challenge Of Disruptive Change.Harvard Business Review,2000(3-4):67-76.
[40]Cohen, S.S.,&Fields, Social Capital and Capital Gains in Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 1999,41(2): 108-130.
[41]Coleman, J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94(Supplement): 95-120.
[42]Contractor F.J. and P. LorangeWhy should firms cooperate?. In Cooperative Strategies in International Business, F.J. Contractor and P. Lorange, eds. Lexington Books, 1988,3-20.
[43]Cooke, David Wills. Small firms, social capital and the enhancement of business performance through innovation programmes. Small Business Economics.Dordrecht: Nov 1999. Vol. 13(3) :219 -236.
[44]Cronin, J. Joseph and Thomas Baker, The Effects of a Distributor's Attribution of Manufacturer Influence on the Distributor's Perceptions of Conflict Performance and Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Channels, 1993,3 (2), 83-110.
[45]Crosby,L.A., Evans,K.R.,&Cowles,D. Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 1990,54(3):68-81 (July).
[46]Daniel J B , Kenneth D B ,Bruce C S. Relationships and Unethical Behavior :A Social Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review ,1998 ; (23)
[47]Das, T.K,and B.Teng..Between trust and control: developing confidence in alliances.Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(3): 491-512.
[48]Davidsson P, and J. Wiklund.Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practices and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2001,25(Summer), 81-99.
[49]D'Aunno, T. A.&Zuckerman, H. S. A life-cycle model of organizational federations: The case of hospitals. Academy of Management Review, 1987,12: 543-545
[50]D'Aunno Delmar, F. Entrepreneurial Behavior and Business Performance. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics. 1996.
[51]Dickson, K.E. and Hadjimanolis, A. Innovation and networking amongst small manufacturing firms in Cyprus. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 1998. 4(1): 5-17.
[52]DiMaggio,Paul J.& Powell,Walter W., The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organization Field,in American Sociological Review, 1983,48:147-160.
[53]DiMaggio , Paul.“Culture and Economy”in Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg (eds.) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. NJ : University Of Princeton Press. 1994.
[54]Doz, Y L. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17:55-83.
[55]Dunlop,J. and Wei1,D. Diffusion and performance of modular production in the US Apparel Industry. Industrial Relations. 1996,35: 334-354.
[56]Dunn,S.C., Seaker,R.F., and Waller,M.A. Latent variables in business logistics research: Scale development and validation, Journal of Business Logistics. 1994,15(2):145-172.
[57]Dyer J H.Singh H.The Relational View:Cooperative Strategy and Source of Interorganization Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review,1998, 23 (4), 660—679.
[58]Dzinknowski,R.The measurement An Introduction, Management Accounting, and management of intellectual capital. 2000, 78(2): 32-36
[59]Edvinsson, L.,Malone, M. S. Intellectual capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Fining Its Hidden Brainpower Harper Business Press, New York, 1997
[60]Ellison G, Glaeser E. The geographic concentration of Industry: does naturaladvantage explain agglomeration? American Economic Review, 1999, 89(2):311-316.
[61]Engstrom, T. E.J., Westnes, P. and Westnes,S.F. Evaluating Intellectual capital in the hotel industry.Journal of Intellectual capital. 2003, 4(3) :287-303.
[62]Fallah M. H. Ibrahim S. Knowledge Spillover and Innovation in Technological Clusters, IAMOT 2004 Conference, Washington, D.C:2004,3-5.
[63]Feser, E. J.Old and new theories of industry clusters. In Clusters and Regional Specialisation; On Geography, Technology, and Networks, edited by M. Steiner, 1998:18-40.
[64]Foss, N. Networks, capabilities, and competitive advantage. Scand. Journal. Management. 1999 ,15: 1-15.
[65]Foss,N.J., The Theory of the Firm:Contractual and Competence Perspectives, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1993, (3):127-144.
[66]Freel , Towards an evolutionary theory of small firm growth ,Journal of Enterprising Culture ,2000 Vol. 8 ,No. 4
[67]Freeman C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 1991, 20(1): 499-514.
[68]Freeman,L. C. Centrality in Social Networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1979, 215-239.
[69]Galaskiewicz, Joseph. The Structure of Community Organizational Networks, Social Forces, 1979.57(4): 1346-1364.
[70] Gefen, D., Straub, D., and Boudreau, M. C. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of AIS, 2000, Vol. 4(7):1-80.
[71]Gereffi G,Humphrey J, Sturgeon T. The governance of global value chains.Review of International Political Economy,2005,12(1):78-104.
[72]Giuliani.The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster.Research Policy, 2005(34): 47-68.
[73]Gnyawali D R,Madhavan R.Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics:A structural embeddedness perspective.Academy of Management, 2001, 26(3): 431-445.
[74]Grabher, G. The weakness of strong ties. The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In: Grabher,G. (ed.) The embedded firm: on the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London: Routledge, 1993:255-277.
[75]Granovetter , Mark , S. Economic Institutions as Social Constructions :A Framework for Analysis. Acta Sociologica , 1992.35 , 1 , 3 - 11.
[76]Granovetter, Mark, S. The Social Construction of Economic Institutions. asp Association Paper. 1990.
[77]Granovetter, M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91: 481-510.
[78]Granovetter, M. The Strength of Weak Tie. American Journal of Sociology,1973 ,78:1360-80.
[79]Greve1& Janet W. Salaff.Social network approach to understand the ethnic economy: A theoretical discourse. GeoJournal, 2005, 64: 7–16.
[80]Griliches,Z. and Regev,H. Firm Productivity in Israeli industry 1979- 1988. Journal of Econometrics,1995,65:175-203.
[81]Gulati, R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(4):293-317.
[82]Gulati, R. Network location and learning: the influences of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, Vol. 20, pp. 397-420.
[83]Gulati,R. The dynamics of alliance formation.Unpublished Phd thesis, Harvard Umversity,Cambridge.1993.
[84]Gundry, L. K. and Welsch, H. P. The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 2001, 16:453-470.
[85]Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. Managing global expansion: A conceptual framework. Business Horizons. 2000. 43, 2: 45-54.
[86]Ha Hoanga ,Bostjan Antoncic. Network - Based Research in Entrepreneurship : A Critical Review. Journal of Business Venturing ,2003 ; (18).
[87]Hagedoorn,J.,&Schakenraad, J.The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 1994,1 S(4): 291-310.
[88]Hakansson H.Industrial Technological Development: A Network Approch. London, 1987.
[89]Hamel, G. Competition for competence and inter-parner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 1991(12): 83-103.
[90]Hamel, Heene. Competence-based Competition,New York,John Wiley. 1994.
[91]Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44: 82-111.
[92] Henderson, R. and I. Cockburn Measuring Competence: Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research, Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15: 63-84.
[93]Hirschman, A..A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development in Latin America, New Haven, Yale University Press. 1971.
[94]Hitt, M.A.,Bierman, Shimizu, K., and Kochhar R. Direct and Moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms:a resource-based perspective.Academy of Management journal, 2001,44(1):13-28.
[95]Holton, R. J. Economy and Society, London: Routledge. 1992.
[96]Hoopes DG Postre 1,S. Shared knowledge, "Glitches," and product Development performance.Strategic Management Journal, 1999(20): 837-865.
[97]Hsu, J.Y. A late-industrial district?:Learning network in the Hsinchu science-based industrial park. Taiwa, Ph.D.dissertation, Department of Geography, university of California, Berkeley. 1997.
[98]Huber, G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 1991, 2, 81-115.
[99]Humphrey, J.,&Schmitz, H. The Triple C Approach to Local Industrial Policy. World Devel ,1996,24(12):1859-1877.
[100]Hunt, S.D,and Morgan, R:M. The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition. Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59 (2): 1-15.
[101]Huselid,M.A. and Becker,B.E.High performance work systems and firm performance: cross-sectional versus panel results.Industrial Relations, 1996, 35: 400 - 422.
[102]Huselid, M.A.The impact of Human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal. 1995,38(3):635-672.
[103]Inakai Pena. Intellectual capital and business start-up success. Journal of Intellectual Capital , 2002 , 3 ( 2):180-198.
[104]Jacobs D, Ard-Pieter De Man. Clusters, industrial policy and firm strategy: A menu approach.Technology Anais and Strategic Management, 1996(8): 425-437.
[105]Jarillo. On strategic network. Strategic management journal, 1988, 9(1): 31-41.
[106]Jay Whittaker,Michelle Burns,John Van Beveren. Understanding and measuring the effect of social capital on knowledge transfer within clusters of small-medium enterprises. 16th Annual Conference of Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand. 2003.10.
[107]Jin Chen. Zhaohui Zhu, Hong Yuan Xie. Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study Journal oflntellectual Capital. 2004. 5(1):195-212.
[108]Joia,L.A.Measuring Intangible Corporate Assets: Linking Business Strategy with Intellectual Capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital.2000,1 (1):68-84.
[109]Johannisson, B;Ramirez-Pasillas, M.Topography Model of Human, SocialEntrepreneurship Research Conference,Networking for Entrepreneurship: Building a and Cultural Capital. Presented on Babson College Jonkoping, Sweden, June. 2001.
[110]Johanson, Jon and Lars-Gunnar Mattsson:Internationalization in Industrial Systems-A Network Approach,P446-472.in Neil Hood and J.E.Vanune (eds),Strategies in the Global Competition,Beckenham,Kent:Croom Helm for the Institute of International Business,Stockholm School of Economics. 1988.
[111]Johnson, W. An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital : measuring the stock and flow of intellectual capital in the firm. International journal of Technology management 1999,18(5l61718):562-575.
[112]Juma, Norma A. The relationship between intellectual capital and new venture performance: An empirical investigation of the moderating role of the environment. The University of Texas at Arlington.2005
[113]Kakabadse N K, Kakabadse A,Kouzmin. A.Reviewing the knowledge management literature: towards a taxonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2003, 17(4):75-91.
[114]Kautz, B. Selman, and M. Shah. ReferralWeb: Combining Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering. Communication of The ACM, vol. 30 no. 3, March 1997.
[115]Kee-Bom Nahm. The Spatial Structure of Unplanned Shopping Clusters developed along the Cheonggyechon- ro and the Emergence New Industrial Clusters. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2001, 5(1), 1-13.
[116]Keeble D, Wilkinson F. Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional cluster of high technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Studies, 1999(33): 295-303.
[117]Kieron Meagher, Mark Rogers. Network density and R&D spillovers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2004, 53(1): 237–260.
[118]Kira R. Absorptive Capacity and Innovation: Evidence from Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Firms. Haas School of Business. November 22, 2004.
[119]Klein, B., Crawford, R.G.and Alchian, A, A. Verticalintegration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. The Journal of Law and Economics.1978,21:297-326.
[120]Kliduff, M.,Tsai,W.,Social Networks and Organizations London:Sage,2003.
[121]Kogut, B. The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry, Journal of Industrial Economics, 1989, 38, 183-197.
[122]Kogut, B., Shan, W., and Walker, G.. Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: Learning through networks? In N. Nohria and R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston.HarvardBusiness School Press. 1992: 348-365.
[123]Kogut B,Zander U.What Firms Do Coordination, Identity, and Learning. Organization Science, 1996, 7(5):502-518.
[124]Koka, B. R. and Prescott, J. E., Strategic alliance as social capital: A multidimensional view, Strategic Management Journal, 2002. 23, 795-816.
[125]Krackhardt, D.,Brass D..Intraorganizational networks: the micro side In Wasserman,S. and Galaskiewicz,J.(Eds),Advances in the Social and Behavioral Sciences from Social Network Analysis Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications. 1994.
[126]Krackhardt, D., Stern, R.Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation, Social Psychology Quarterly, 1988, Vol. 51 No. 2: 123-40.
[127]Lee,C., Lee, K. and Pennings,J.M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22: 615-640.
[128]Leenders R. J , Gabbay S M. Corporate Social Capital and Liability. Boston : Kluwer Inc. , 1999.
[129]Li, H. & Atuahene- Gima, K., Product Innovation Strategy and Performance of New Technology Ventures in China, Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(6) :1123-1134.
[130]Li, H. & Atuahene- Gima, K.,The Adoption of Agency Business Activity, Product Innovation and Performance in Chinese Technology Ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 2002(23):469-490.
[131]Liao, Jianwen, Welsch, Harold. Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: a comparison of technology- and non- technology- based nascent entrepreneurs Journal ofHigh Technology Management Research, 2003, Volume: 14, Issue: 1:149- 170.
[132]Lin, N., Building a network theory of social capital, Connections, 1999, 22 .1:28-51.
[133]Lin, N., Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment, American Sociology Review, 1981 , 46, 393-405.
[134]Lissoni. F. Knowledge codification and thegeography of innovation: the case of Brescia mechanical. cluster. Research Policy, 2001, 30: 1479-1500.
[135]MacDuffie,J.P. Human resource bundle and manufacturing performance: organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1995,48: 197-221.
[136]Mahoney, J.T. and Pandian,J.R..The resource-based view within theconversation of strategic management.Strategic Management Journal. 1992, 13(5):363-380.
[137]Majumdar,S.The impact of human capital quality on the boundaries of the firms in the US telecommunications industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1998, 7(4):663-677.
[138]Makusen A R. Sticky places in slippery space :A typology of industrial districts . Economic Geography ,1996, 72: 293 -313.
[139]Marr,B. and Spender,J.C. Measuring knowledge assets--implications ofthe knowledge economy for performance measurement.Measuring Business Excellence. 2004, 8(1): 18-28.
[140]Maskell P. & Malmberg, A. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1999, 23: 167-189.
[141]Mazzola, F. and S. Bruni.The role of linkages in firm performance: Evidence from Southern Italy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2000,Vol. 43, pp. 199-221.
[142]McClelland, D.C.Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs, Journal of Creative Behavior, 1987,21, 219-233.
[143] McEvily B, Zaheer A. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities . Strategic Management Journal,1999,31(4):35-55.
[144]McGrath, R.G., Tsai, M.H., Venkataramen S. and MacMillan, LC. 1996.
[145]Meso,P.and Smith,R..A resource-based view of organizational knowledge management systems. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2000.4(3) 224-234.
[146]Michael D. Social networks and economic sociology: a proposed research agenda for more complete social science, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1997,56(3): 287-302.
[147]Michalisin,M.D., Smith,R.D. and Kline,D.M. In search of strategic assets.The international journal of organizational analysis. 1997, 5(4):360-387.
[148]Michael F, Grit F. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy, 2004, 33(2): 245–255.
[149]Mitchell, J.C. The Concept and Use of Social Networks, in Mitchell, J.C. (ed), Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1969:1-50.
[150]Molina-Morales FX. European industrial districts: influence of geographic concentration on performance of the firm. Journal of International Management, 2001(7): 277-294.
[151]Molina-Morales FX, Mart'mez-Fernandez MT. The impact of industrial district affiliation on firm value creation. European Planning Studies,2003(11): 156-169.
[152]Molina-Morales, F. Xavier and Martinez-Fernandez, M. Teresa.How much difference is there between industrial district firms? A net value creation approach. Research Policy, 2004,33(3): 473-486.
[153]Nadine Massard, Caroline Mehier. Proximity, accessibility to knowledge and innovation. Regional Studies Association International Conference. Gateway 5 Meaning and Role of Proximity Aalborg – 28th May to 31st May 2005.
[154]Nahapiet J. & Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2): 242-266.
[155]Nelson R R,Winter S. An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
[156]Nohria, N.&Garcia-Pont, C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure . Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 1991(12): 105-124.
[157]Nonaka, I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 1994, 5 (1): 14-37.
[158]Nooteboom , V A Gilsing. Density and Strength of Ties in Innovation Net2 works :A Competence and Governance View. Working Paper ,2004
[159]Nunzia Carbonara. Innovation processes within geographical clusters: a cognitive Approach. Technovation, 2004, 24: 17–28.
[160]Olav Sorenson, Jan Rivkin, Lee Fleming. Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow. Harvard Business School Strategy Working Paper Series, 2002.4.
[161]Osborn,R.N.,& Baughn,C.C.Forms of interorganisational governance for multinational alliances.Academy of Management Journal,1990,33(3): 503-519.
[162]Ostgaard, A. and Birley. S. New Venture Growth and Personal Networks. Journal of Business Research 1996,36: 37-50.
[163]Palacios-Marques,D. and Garrigos-Simon,F.J. Validating and measuring IC in the biotechnology and telecommunication industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2003,4(3):332-347.
[164]Park, S. H. and Luo, Y., Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms, Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22, 455-477.
[165]Pena,I. Intellectual capital and business start-up success.Journal of Intellectual capital, 2002,3(2):l 80-198.
[166]Peng, M. W., and Heath, P. The growth ofthe firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy ofManagement Review, 1996,2l (2):492-528.
[167]Pennings,J.M.,Lee,K. and van Witteloostuijn,A.. Human capital, social capital and firm dissolution. Academy of Management Journa1, 1998, 41: 425-440.
[168]Penrose, E. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1959.
[169]Pentland, B. Read me what it says on your screen: The interpretive problem in technical service work. Technology Studies, 1995, 2, 50-79.
[170]Perry-smith J E,Shalley C E.The Soclal Side of Creativty:a Statuc and Dynamlc Soclal Network Perspective.Academy of Management Review, 2003,28(1):89.
[171]Pfeffer, J. Competitive advantage through people, California Management Review, 1994,36 (2):9-28
[172]Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R.. The external control of organizations: Aresource dependence perspective: Harper, New York.1978.
[173]Podolny J. M., & Page, K. L. Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 1998, 24: 57–76.
[174]Podolny J M,Stuart T E,Hannan M T. Networks, knowledge, andniches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry ... Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,1995.
[175]Porter ME. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review 1998(76): 77-90.
[176]Porter,M.E.Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy .Economic Development Quarterly, 2000, 14(1):15-34.
[177]Portes, A., Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Immigration: A Conceptual Overview, The Economic Sociology of Immigration, New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1995.
[178]Powell, W. W. and Brantley P. Competitive Cooperation in biotechnology: learning through networks? in N.form and action, Boston,Nohria and R. Eccles(eds),Networks and Organizations: structure,MA: Harvard Lniversiy Press, 1992, 366-394.
[179]Powell, Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior. 1990, 12:295 - 336.
[180]Prescott, E.C. and M.Visscher.. Organizational Capital. Journal of Political Economy 1980, 88:446-461.
[181]Prusak , L.Where did knowledge management come from ? IBM Systems Journal , 2001,40 (4):1002 – 1007.
[182]Putnam R. D. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal ofDemocracy, 2000, (6): 65-78.
[183]Putnam, R.D. : The prosperous community: social capital and public life, American Prospect, 1993 (13)-35-42.
[184]Pyka. Informal networking and indust riallife cycles. Technovation , 2000 , 20 (1) :25 – 261.
[185]Rajesh S. Upadhyayula. Social capital as an antecedent of absorptive of firms. Paper to be presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2004 on Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development. Elsinore, Denmark, June 14-16, 2004.
[186]Renzulli, L.Aidrich, H.,and Moody, 3. Family matters: Gender, networks andentrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces, 2000,79(2), 523-546.
[187] Riahi-belkaoui. Intellectual Capital and Finn Performance of Multinational Firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital ,2003, (4) :5 - 6.
[188]Rindova, V. and C. Fombrun. Constructing Competitive Advantage: The Role of Firm – Constituent Interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20: 691-710.
[189]Ring, P. S.&Ven, A. H. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations .Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13(7):483-498.
[190]Ritter, T. A Framework for Analyzing Interconnectedness of Relationships. Industrial Marketing Management 2000, 29: 317-326.
[191]Roberts PW, bowling GR. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance.Strategic Management Journal, 2002(23): 1077-1093.
[192]Rothaermel FT. Research note in cumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic management journal, 2001(22):687-699.
[193]Rowley, T. Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences, Academy of Management Review, 1997,22 (4):887-911.
[194]Rowley, Tim, D. Behrens, and D.Krackhardt,Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries, Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21 (3),369-386.
[195]Sabel, C. F. Studies trust: building new forms of co-operation in a volatile economy. In F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger, eds., Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration,. 1992, 215-250. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
[196]Sarkar, M.B., Echambadi, R., and Harrison, J.S.. Alliance Entrepreneurship and Firm Market Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2001,22: 701-712.
[197]Saxenian A. The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy. Amsterdam. 1991, 20(5): 423-438.
[198]Saxenian, Annalee. Regional Advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1994.
[199]Senjem and Reed.. Social Capital And Network Entrepreneurs. Frontiers Of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, Mass. 2002
[200]Servaes,Henri. Tobin's Q and the Gains from Takeovers, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, No. 1.(Mar., 1991), 409-419.
[201]Sham W G&Kogut, B. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(5): 387-394.
[202]Simsek,Michael H ·Lubatkin,Steven W ·Floyd,Inter-firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior:A Structural Embeddednes Perspective,Journal of Management.2003,29(3):427-442.
[203]Skandia. Visualizing intellectual capital in Skandia. A supplement to Skandia's 1994 Annual Report. Sweden,1994.
[204]Skvoretz, J., T.J. Fararo, and F. Agneessens. Advances in Biased Net Theory: Definitions, Derivations, and Estimations.Social Networks, 2004, 26: 113- 139.
[205] Staber, U. Spatial proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial district: the case of knitwear firms in Baden-Wurttemberg, Regional Studies, 2001, 35,329-341.
[206]Steinter M, The discreet charm of clusters: An introduction. In: Steinter EM. (ed.) Clusters and Regional Specialisation On Geography Technology and Networks, 1998:1-17.
[207] Stewart, T. A. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, New York:Doubleday Currency,1997.
[208]Stewart, F. and Ghani, E.. How significant are externalities for development?, World Development, 1991,19(6):569–94.
[209]Storper M, Scott A. The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes. In: Wolch, J., Dear, M. (Eds.), The Power of Geography: How Territory Shapes Social Life Social Reproduction. Unwin and Hyman, Boston, MA, 1989: 21-40.
[210]Stuart, T.E., Hoang, H.& Hybels, R.C. Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999(44): 315-349.
[212]Sveiby, K. E. The New Organization Wealth: Management and Measuring Knowledge-based Assets Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1997.
[213]Swart, J. Intellectual capital: disentangling an enigmatic concept. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2006,7, 2:136-159.
[214]Swedberg , R. New Economic Sociology : What has Been Accomplished , What is Ahead ? . Acta Sociologica , 1997 , (40) :161～182.
[215]Sternberg . Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1985Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 607- 627.
[216]Taylor, M., Enterprise, Power and Embeddedness:An Empirical Exploration, in Vatne,Taylor(eds.),The Networked Firm in a Global World: Small Firms in New Enviornment, Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate, 2000: 199-233.
[217]Teece,D.J.Managing intellectual capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions. Oxford:Oxford University Press. 2000.
[218]Teece, D, Pisano G. and Shuen, A.. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.Strategic Management Journal, 1997,Vol. l 8, No 7.
[219]Thorelli, H. Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies, Strategic Management Journal.1986,7(1): 37–51.
[220]Thursby. What Do We Say about Ourselves and What Does It Mean? Yet Another Look at Economics Department Research, Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, 2000 vol. 38(2):383-404.
[221]Todeva E. Analysis of Business Network Dynamics, Presented at the 6th Annual Organization Science Winter Conference, Keystone, Colorado, US. 2000,9-13.
[222]Tsai W., & Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41: 464–476.
[223]Tsai, W. Knowledge Transfer in Intra-organizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44: 996-1004.
[224]Ulrich,D.Intellectual capital=competence*commitment. Sloan Management Review 1998,39(2):15-26.
[225]Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 35-67.
[226]Uzzi, B. Social relations and networks in the making of financial capital[J]. Amer Soc. Rev.1999(64):481-505.
[227] Vatne E, Taylor M. The Networked Firm in a Global World: Small Firms in New Environments . Aldershot: Ashgate,2000.
[228]Walter,A., Mu''11er,T.A., Helfert,G.,& Ritter,T. Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality. Industrial Marketing Management , 2003,32 (2): 159- 169.
[229]Weinzimmer, L. G., Nystrom, P. C. and Freeman, S. J.Measuring organizational growth: Issues, consequences and guidelines. Journal of Management, 1998, 24(2), 235-262.
[230]Wen-Ying Wang; Chingfu Chang.Intellectual capital and performance in causal models: Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan.Journal of Intellectual Capital; 2005; 6, 2; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 222-236.
[231]Wong Siu - lun, Salaff W. Network capital: emigration from Hong Kong . British Journal of Sociology, 1998,49(3) :358 - 375.
[232]Wright,P.M.,McMahan,G.C.,and sustained competitive advantage: McWilliams, A..Human resources and a resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 1994, 5:301-326.
[233]Yeung, H.Critical reviews of geographical perspectives on business organisations and the organisation of production: towards a network approach, Progress in Human Geography, 1994, 18(4), 460-490.
[234]Yli-Renko H., Autio, E. & Sapienza, H. J. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22: 587-613.
[235]Youndt M. A.,Subramaniam M.& Snell S. A.2004. Intellectual Capital Profiles: An Examination of Investments and Returns, Journal of Management Studies,41(2):335-361.
[236]Zhao, L. and Aram, J.D.Networking and growth of young technology -intensive ventures in China. Journal of Business Venturing, 1995,10(5), 349-370.
[237]安素霞.社会资本对人力资本的整合效应. 中国人口科学,2005 年增刊:111-114.
[238]边燕杰和丘海雄,企业的社会资本及功效,中国社会科学,2000(2): 87-99.
[239]蔡铂,聂鸣.社会网络对产业集群技术创新的影响,科学学与科学技术 管理,2003年第7期:56-60.
[240]蔡禾.2003都市社会学研究范式之比较-人类生态学与都市社会学,学术论坛,2003年第3期.
[241]蔡华林.企业集群内社会资本演进的动力机制研究.财经论丛,2005 年第6 期:76-84.
[242]蔡莉,刘彤,赵英才.高技术产业开发区凝聚经济效益模型.吉林工业大学学报,1994 年第 4 期:47-53.
[243]蔡宁, 吴结兵.产业集群组织间关系密集性的社会网络分析,浙江大学学报,2006年7月.第36 卷第4 期:58-65.
[244]蔡秀玲,林竞君。基于网络嵌入性的集群生命周期研究——一个新经济社会学的视角,经济地理,2005 年 3 月:281-284.
[245]陈鸽林. 基于博弈论的企业战略网络研究.广东工业大学硕士论文,2006.
[246]陈旭.基于产业集群的技术创新扩散研究.管理学报,2005 年第 3 期:333-336.
[247]陈艳莹,原毅军,柏丹.企业价值导向的智力资本分类与管理. 软科学,2005 年.第 19 卷,第 3 期:71-74.
[248]程承坪、王飞军、黄小平,人力资本投资风险探讨,人才开发,2001年2月.
[249]程国萍,熊云生,吴敏.社会网络与社会资本财贸研究,2005年第4期:115-116.
[250]成树芬.企业智慧资产管理--提升为知识企业的良方.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003年版
[251]邓莉,梅洪常.溢出效应与企业簇群创新机制的构建,企业经济,2004年第4期:132-134
[252]冯邦彦, 方红. 关于企业“组织资本”的理论分析. 经济学动态, 2005,(10).
[253]冯进路,冯绍彬.企业核心能力刚性的产生及其克服.科研管理。2005年3 月,第26卷第2期:120-125.
[254]冯天学,张庆普,闫相斌.企业知识资本系统的结构与功能.科学学与科学技术管理,2006 年第 7 期:93-97.
[255]冯亚明.基于人力资本的构成谈产业集群有利于职业经理人才队伍的成长.企业家天地,2006 年第 9 期:114-115.
[256]付彦.企业知识管理论的历史研究与发展.经济与管理研究,2004 年第 6期:57-59.
[257]高展军,李垣.战略网络结构对企业技术创新的影响研究.科学学研究, 2006 年,第 24 卷,第 3 期:474-479.
[258]耿帅. 基于共享性资源观的集群企业竞争优势研究.浙江大学博士论文,2005 年 4 月.
[259]龚绍东. 产业集群“蜂巢型结构”形态的实证分析. 中国工业经济, 2005, (10).
[260]郭保伟.知识管理与图书馆.中国西部科技,2007 年第 1 期:90-92.
[261]郭劲光、高静美,网络、资源与竞争优势:一个企业社会学视角下的观点,中国工业经济,2003年第3期:79-86.
[262]顾慧君,王文平.基于社会网络的内生型产业集群演化解释.现代管理科学,2005年第12期:27-29.
[263]何亚琼,葛中锋,苏竣.区域创新网络中组织间学习机制研究.学术交流,2006 年第 2 期:63-68.
[264]贺寨平.国外社会支持网研究综述.国外社会科学,2001年第1期。
[265]胡凤玲,上官学进,周艳. 网络资源与企业技术创新集群竞争优势. 审计与经济研究,第 20 卷第 1 期,2005 年 1 月:88-90.
[266]惠宁.知识溢出的经济效应研究.西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007年1月,第37卷第1期,25-29.
[267]黄汉民著.企业发展的组织资源能力研究.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2003.
[268]黄洁. 集群企业成长中的网络演化.浙江大学博士论文,2005年10月.
[269]黄海云,陈莉平. 嵌入社会网络的企业集群结构及其优势. 现代管理科学,2005年第5期:70-71.
[270]吉国秀,王伟光. 产业集群与区域竞争合作机制:一种基于社会网络的分析,中国科技论坛,2006年第3期:95-99.
[271]贾生华,邹爱其,张学华.企业集群化成长障碍调查——以浙江省为例.经济理论与经济管理,2003年第7期:69-74.
[272]蒋春燕,赵曙明.社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用——江苏与广东新兴企业的实证研究.管理世界,2006 年第 10期:90-112.
[273]金峻岭. 智力资本测度及其对企业绩效影响研究.浙江大学硕士论文,2005年12月.
[274]康世瀛. 产业集群与供应链形成发展的基础推动力信任, 科技进步与对策2005年第1期:146-148.
[275]兰洁颖. 基于企业、市场与网络的核心能力功能——一个文献综述,当代经济(下半月),2006 年 12 期:43-44.
[276]兰玉杰陈晓剑.人力资本与企业所有权安排的合约选择.数量经济技术经济研究,2003,(11):18-22.
[277]雷如桥,陈继祥.集群网络研究:一个社会网络理论的视角.经济问题探索,2004 年第 12 期:130-131.
[278]李钟文,威廉·米勒等.硅谷优势:创新与创业精神的栖息地.北京:人民出版社,2002,8.
[279]李树茁,韦 艳,任义科. 基于整体网络视角的农民工行为影响因素分析,2007年第1期:10-18.
[280]李冬琴,智力资本与企业绩效的关系研究,浙江大学博士论文.2004.
[281]李惠斌和杨雪冬,社会资本与社会发展,北京,社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[282]李霄.珠三角民营企业产业演进与集群化成长的机制研究. 佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版), 2005 年 11 月,第 23 卷第 6 期:32-35.
[283]李新春.企业家协调与企业集群——对珠江三角洲专业企业集群化成长的分析.南开管理评论,2002 年 03 期 :49-55.
[284]李新春.企业集群化成长的资源能力获取与创造.学术研究,2002 年第 7期:10-12.
[285]李新春,企业联盟与网络,广州:广东人民出版社,2000 年.
[286]刘存福,侯光明,李存金.中小民营企业集群的社会网络分析及发展趋势探讨。科学学与科学技术管理,2005 年第 7 期:144-148.
[287]刘东.企业网络论.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:238-239.
[288]刘仁军. 交易成本、社会资本与企业网络,华中科技大学博士论文.2004.
[289]林竞君.嵌入性、社会网络与产业集群——一个新经济社会学的视角.经济经纬,2004 年第 5 期:45-48.
[290]刘国武,李卫星.知识企业的主导生产要素:知识资本——基于“概念格”理论的推论. 财经研究,2006 年,第 32 卷第 12 期:130-139.
[291]刘辉.竞争环境下企业知识管理研究——兼以我国集群企业为例分析.情报杂志,2005 年第 4 期:36-37.
[292]刘军.社会网络分析导论.北京:社会科学文献出版社.2004 年 12 月.
[293]林嵩、姜彦福.结构方程模型理论及其在管理研究中的应用,科学学与科学技术管理,2006 年第 2 期:38-41.
[294]林润辉.网络组织与企业高成长,天津:南开大学出版社,2004年.
[295]鲁开垠.产业集群社会网络的根植性与核心能力研究.广东社会科学,2006 年第 2 期:41-46.
[296]卢福财,周鹏. 外部网络化与企业组织创新. 中国工业经济,2004 年第2 期:101-106.
[297]罗家德.NQ 风暴--企业关系管理的智能.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002 年 8.
[298]罗家德.社会网分析讲义。北京:社会科学文献出版社. 2005.
[299]罗文军,傅平,陆玮.战略联盟的组织学习机制. 经济管理,2004 年 3月第 6 期:16-20.
[300]马歇尔.经济学原理,北京:商务印书馆,1991 年.
[301]毛蕴诗,周燕.硅谷机制与企业高速成长——再论企业与市场之间的关系,管理世界,2002 年第 6 期.102-108.
[302]马刚.基于战略网络视角的产业区企业竞争优势研究——以浙江两个典型的传统优势产业区为例。浙江大学博士论文,2005年10月.
[303]宁继鸣. 知识型企业人力资本激励问题的特殊性. 山东大学学报.2006年第6期:92-98.
[304]宁凌. 企业人力资本运作机制研究. 华中农业大学博士论文,2003年5月.
[305]聂鸣,梅丽霞,鲁莹.班加罗尔软件产业集群的社会资本研究.研究与发展管理,2004年4月,第16卷第2期:46-49.
[306]牛飞亮.西方企业网络理论的产生及其范式创新.企业导报.1999 年第 2期:43-36.
[307]彭正银.网络治理理论探析.中国软科学 2002 年第 3 期:50-54.
[308]潘锡辉,魏谷.关于当前国家高新区发展若干问题探讨.经济问题探索,2007年第3期:178-181.
[309]祁红梅,庞世俊,王惠东.基于合作的主动知识外溢策略研究.科学管理研究,2004 年第 8 期:70-73.
[310]邱均平等.论知识管理与竞争情报.图书情报工作,2000第4期:11-14.
[311]芮明杰. 新企业成长的内生性资源:智力资本.学术月刊,2006年4月:91-95.
[312]斯密.国富论,中译本,西安:陕西人民出版社,2001年版.
[313]宋竞. 智力资本与企业竞争优势研究.四川大学硕士论文.2003 年.
[314]舒尔茨.人力资本投资,载于舒尔茨.人力资本投资--教育和研究的作用.北京:商务印书馆.1990.
[315]苏英,穆荣平,宋河发,王琴.高技术产业集群的竞争优势论. 科学学与科学技术管理,2007年第2期:120-126.
[317]谭露.高新技术产业集群中社会资本的来源及作用.经济师,2006年第2期:76-77.
[318]陶守强,依托产业集群的企业成长机制研究商业研究.2006年第10 期:164-166.
[319]王华,张阳,戴薇.社会网络嵌入性视角的产业集群竞争优势探析. 科技进步与对策, 2006 年 01 期:77-79.
[320]王辑慈.创新的空间企业集群与区域发展.北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[321]王芹.硅谷信息科技产业集群的社会资本研究. 河南大学学报,2006 年 3 月,第 46 卷,第 2 期:66-69.
[322]王霄宁.基于社会网络分析的产业集群建模及实证检验. 系统工程.2005 年第3 期:115-119.
[323]王江龙.基于创新网络的产业集群内技术创新过程模式研究.浙江大学硕士论文,2004年12月.
[324]王勇,许庆瑞.智力资本及其测度研究.研究与发展管理,2002,2:56-61.
[325]王双龙.浅析组织资本对企业绩效的影响.财会月刊(理论版),2006年第11期:53-54.
[326]王越.组织内社会网络的知识传导及成本研究.科学管理研究,2004 年第8 期:75-77.
[327]韦伯. 工业区位论. 北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[328]魏晓栋, 姚春序.产业集群视角下的人力资本指标体系的构建,浙江理工大学学报,第 24 卷,第 2 期, 2007 年 3 月:211-215.
[329]魏后凯.对产业集群与竞争力关系的考察,经济管理,2003 第 6 期:4-11.
[330]魏江.产业集群-创新系统与技术学习.北京:科学出版社,2003 年.
[331]邬爱其.集群企业网络化成长机制研究—对浙江三个产业集群的实证研究,浙江大学博士论文,2004 年 12 月.
[332]吴强军. 浙江省中小企业集群化成长影响因素实证研究. 浙江大学硕士论文,2004年6月.
[333]吴冰,王重鸣.知识和知识管理:一个文献综述.华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006年第1期:57-61.
[334]吴结兵. 基于企业网络结构与动态能力的产业集群竞争优势研究. 浙江大学博士论文,2006 年 4 月.
[335]许小虎. 基于企业能力的自我中心型战略网络研究. 浙江大学博士论文,2006 年 4 月.
[336]许小虎,项保华.企业网络理论发展脉络与研究内容综述.科研管理,2006年 1 月,第 27 卷第 1 期:114-120.
[337]姚小涛,席酉民.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版) ,2003 ,(9) :22 - 27.
[338]姚莉英.企业创新体系中的人力资本。创业者,2006年12期:18-21,科学学研究,2002年第3期:272-27.
[339]杨淑娥,袁春生,丁善明.高科技企业集群化成长的资源获取与资源供给缺失. 科技管理研究,2006 年第 8 期:76-78.
[340]俞凯华.基于产业集群的高新区发展导向研究科技进步与对策.2006 年 1月号:59-61.
[341]虞剑文 , 朱晓军 , 丁玉芹。复杂性科学视角下的组织与组织资本,发展战略,2006 年第 4 期,第 19 卷总第 112 期:61.
[342]张炳申,马建会.珠江三角洲中小企业集群化成长的问题及对策.统计与预测,2003 年第 5 期:4-7.
[343]张海燕; 李曼妮.企业集群内核心企业成长分析.中国市场,2006 年第 49期:50-51.
[344]张炜. 中小高技术企业创业知识资本与成长绩效关系研究. 浙江大学博士论文,2005 年 4 月.
[345]张伟峰,万威武,白靖宇.网络资本:硅谷群发展的核心能力.科学学研究, 第20卷,第6期,2002年12月:631-634.
[346]郑美群. 基于智力资本的高技术企业绩效形成机理研究. 吉林大学博士论文,2006 年 12 月.
[347]朱国宏.经济社会学.上海.复旦大学出版社.2003.
[348]朱海就,陆立军,袁安府.从企业网络看产业集群竞争力差异的原因——浙江和意大利产业集群的比较.软科学,2004年第18卷第1期:53-56.
[349]朱秀梅. 知识溢出、吸收能力对高技术产业集群创新的影响研究.吉林大学博士论文,2006 年 7 月.
[1]Adler P S, Kwon Seok-Woo. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(1): 17-40.
[2]Ahuja Gautam.Collaboration Networks,Structural Holes,and Innovation:A Longitudinal Study.Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45(3):425-456.
[3]Alavi M,Leidner D E.Knowledge management systems:issues,challenges,and benefits.Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 1999, (1):7-17.
[4]Albino, VA., Garavelli, C., Schiuma, Cue, Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts: the role of the leader firm, Technovation, 1999, 19: 53-63.
[5]Aldrich, H.E.& Reese, P R .Does Networking Pay Off? A Panel Study of Entrepreneurs in the Research Triangle in Churchill, S. & Birley, J. Doutriaux. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.Massachusetts: Wellesley 1993: 325-339
[6]Aldrich, Howard, Catherine Zimmer, and Trevor Jones. Small Business Still Speaks With the Same Voice: A Peplication of Survival. Sociological Review. 1986.34: 335-56.
[7]Alessandro Malipiero, Federico Munari and Maurizio Sobrero. Focal Firms as Technological Gatekeepers within Industrial Districts: Knowledge Creation and Dissemination in the Italian Packaging Machinery Industry. Paper presented to the DRUID Winter Conference. 2005.4.
[8]Andrade, G, Mitchell, M. and Stafford, E. New Evidence and Perspective on Megers' , Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2001, vol. 15, no. 2:103-120.
[9]Andrews, K..The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, III: Richard D. Irwin. 1971
[10]Antal, A.B.,Dierkes, M.and Hahner,K.Business in society: perceptions and principles in organizational learning. Journal of General Management, 1994, Vo1.20,No.2:55-77.
[11]Axelrod, R. & Cohen, M. D. Harnessing complexity. New York, Free Press. 1999.
[12]Bain, J. Industrial Organization. Whey, New York.1959.
[13]Bala Ramasamy, K.W. Goh, Matthew C.H. Yeung. Is Guanxi (relationship) a bridge to knowledge transfer? Journal of Business Research, 2006, 59(3): 130-139.
[14]Barabasi, L. & Albert, R., Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science,1999, 286: 509-512.
[15]Barney, J.B. Organization culture: Can it competitive advantage? . Academy of Management be a source of sustained Review, 1986. 11:656-665.
[16]Barney, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 1991.17 (l):99-120.
[17]Bartel,A.P.Productivity gains from the implementation of employee training programs. Industrial Relations, 1994,33:411-425.
[18]Baum, J.A.C., Calabrese, T.& Silverman, B.S. Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000(21): 267-294.
[19]Becattini G. The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion, in Pyke F., Becattini G.and W Sengenberger (Eds), Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990: 37-51.
[20]Becker, B. E. Gerhart, B. The import of human resource management on organization performance: progress and prospects, Academy of Management Journal,1996,39: 779-801
[21]Benson,C. and Lohnes, P.. Skill durable goods manufacturing. requirements and industrial training in Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 1959 (12):540-553.
[22]Best, M. The new competition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 1990.
[23]Beugelsdijk, S., Smulders, S. Bridging and bonding social capital: which type is good for economic growth, Center/Faculty of Economics, Tilburg University, working paper. 2003.
[24]Bontis, N. Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital, International Journal ofManagement Reviews, 2001,3(1):41-60.
[25]Bontis,N., Chua,W. and Richardson,S. Intellectual capital and the nature of business in Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2000,l(1): 85-100.
[26]Bontis N, Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study that Develops Measures and Models. Management Decision 1998.36(2):63-72.
[27]Borgatti, S.P. What Is Social Network Analysis?, 1998. http: // www. analytictech. com/networks/whatis.htm.
[28] Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, New York: Greenwood. 1986, 241-258.
[29]Brooking, A. Intellectual Capital: core assets for the third millennium enterprise. Thomeson Business Press. London, UK. 1996.
[30]Bresnahan,T.F., Brynjolfsson,E. and Hitt,L.M. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. 2002.
[31]Burt, R. S. Range. In S. S. Burt and M. J. Minor (Eds),Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 1983: 176 -194.
[32]Butt, R.S. Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception and Action. New York: Academic Press. 1982.
[33]Burt R. S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
[34]Camagni, R.Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives, London, Belhaven Press. 1991.
[35]Capello Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in Hi-Tech Milieu: Learning Versus Collective Learning Progress, Regional Studies, 1999, 33: 352-365.
[36]Castillo J. A Note on the Concept of Tacit Knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2002, 11(1): 46-57
[37]Churchill,G. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal ofMarketing Research, 1979.l6(1):64-73.
[38]Churchill, N.C., Lewis, V.L., The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review.1983.61 (3), 30-50.
[39]Clayton M Christensen, Michael Overdorf.Meeting The Challenge Of Disruptive Change.Harvard Business Review,2000(3-4):67-76.
[40]Cohen, S.S.,&Fields, Social Capital and Capital Gains in Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 1999,41(2): 108-130.
[41]Coleman, J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94(Supplement): 95-120.
[42]Contractor F.J. and P. LorangeWhy should firms cooperate?. In Cooperative Strategies in International Business, F.J. Contractor and P. Lorange, eds. Lexington Books, 1988,3-20.
[43]Cooke, David Wills. Small firms, social capital and the enhancement of business performance through innovation programmes. Small Business Economics.Dordrecht: Nov 1999. Vol. 13(3) :219 -236.
[44]Cronin, J. Joseph and Thomas Baker, The Effects of a Distributor's Attribution of Manufacturer Influence on the Distributor's Perceptions of Conflict Performance and Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Channels, 1993,3 (2), 83-110.
[45]Crosby,L.A., Evans,K.R.,&Cowles,D. Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 1990,54(3):68-81 (July).
[46]Daniel J B , Kenneth D B ,Bruce C S. Relationships and Unethical Behavior :A Social Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review ,1998 ; (23)
[47]Das, T.K,and B.Teng..Between trust and control: developing confidence in alliances.Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(3): 491-512.
[48]Davidsson P, and J. Wiklund.Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practices and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2001,25(Summer), 81-99.
[49]D'Aunno, T. A.&Zuckerman, H. S. A life-cycle model of organizational federations: The case of hospitals. Academy of Management Review, 1987,12: 543-545
[50]D'Aunno Delmar, F. Entrepreneurial Behavior and Business Performance. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics. 1996.
[51]Dickson, K.E. and Hadjimanolis, A. Innovation and networking amongst small manufacturing firms in Cyprus. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 1998. 4(1): 5-17.
[52]DiMaggio,Paul J.& Powell,Walter W., The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organization Field,in American Sociological Review, 1983,48:147-160.
[53]DiMaggio , Paul.“Culture and Economy”in Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg (eds.) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. NJ : University Of Princeton Press. 1994.
[54]Doz, Y L. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17:55-83.
[55]Dunlop,J. and Wei1,D. Diffusion and performance of modular production in the US Apparel Industry. Industrial Relations. 1996,35: 334-354.
[56]Dunn,S.C., Seaker,R.F., and Waller,M.A. Latent variables in business logistics research: Scale development and validation, Journal of Business Logistics. 1994,15(2):145-172.
[57]Dyer J H.Singh H.The Relational View:Cooperative Strategy and Source of Interorganization Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review,1998, 23 (4), 660—679.
[58]Dzinknowski,R.The measurement An Introduction, Management Accounting, and management of intellectual capital. 2000, 78(2): 32-36
[59]Edvinsson, L.,Malone, M. S. Intellectual capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Fining Its Hidden Brainpower Harper Business Press, New York, 1997
[60]Ellison G, Glaeser E. The geographic concentration of Industry: does naturaladvantage explain agglomeration? American Economic Review, 1999, 89(2):311-316.
[61]Engstrom, T. E.J., Westnes, P. and Westnes,S.F. Evaluating Intellectual capital in the hotel industry.Journal of Intellectual capital. 2003, 4(3) :287-303.
[62]Fallah M. H. Ibrahim S. Knowledge Spillover and Innovation in Technological Clusters, IAMOT 2004 Conference, Washington, D.C:2004,3-5.
[63]Feser, E. J.Old and new theories of industry clusters. In Clusters and Regional Specialisation; On Geography, Technology, and Networks, edited by M. Steiner, 1998:18-40.
[64]Foss, N. Networks, capabilities, and competitive advantage. Scand. Journal. Management. 1999 ,15: 1-15.
[65]Foss,N.J., The Theory of the Firm:Contractual and Competence Perspectives, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1993, (3):127-144.
[66]Freel , Towards an evolutionary theory of small firm growth ,Journal of Enterprising Culture ,2000 Vol. 8 ,No. 4
[67]Freeman C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 1991, 20(1): 499-514.
[68]Freeman,L. C. Centrality in Social Networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1979, 215-239.
[69]Galaskiewicz, Joseph. The Structure of Community Organizational Networks, Social Forces, 1979.57(4): 1346-1364.
[70] Gefen, D., Straub, D., and Boudreau, M. C. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of AIS, 2000, Vol. 4(7):1-80.
[71]Gereffi G,Humphrey J, Sturgeon T. The governance of global value chains.Review of International Political Economy,2005,12(1):78-104.
[72]Giuliani.The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster.Research Policy, 2005(34): 47-68.
[73]Gnyawali D R,Madhavan R.Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics:A structural embeddedness perspective.Academy of Management, 2001, 26(3): 431-445.
[74]Grabher, G. The weakness of strong ties. The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In: Grabher,G. (ed.) The embedded firm: on the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London: Routledge, 1993:255-277.
[75]Granovetter , Mark , S. Economic Institutions as Social Constructions :A Framework for Analysis. Acta Sociologica , 1992.35 , 1 , 3 - 11.
[76]Granovetter, Mark, S. The Social Construction of Economic Institutions. asp Association Paper. 1990.
[77]Granovetter, M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91: 481-510.
[78]Granovetter, M. The Strength of Weak Tie. American Journal of Sociology,1973 ,78:1360-80.
[79]Greve1& Janet W. Salaff.Social network approach to understand the ethnic economy: A theoretical discourse. GeoJournal, 2005, 64: 7–16.
[80]Griliches,Z. and Regev,H. Firm Productivity in Israeli industry 1979- 1988. Journal of Econometrics,1995,65:175-203.
[81]Gulati, R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(4):293-317.
[82]Gulati, R. Network location and learning: the influences of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, Vol. 20, pp. 397-420.
[83]Gulati,R. The dynamics of alliance formation.Unpublished Phd thesis, Harvard Umversity,Cambridge.1993.
[84]Gundry, L. K. and Welsch, H. P. The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 2001, 16:453-470.
[85]Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. Managing global expansion: A conceptual framework. Business Horizons. 2000. 43, 2: 45-54.
[86]Ha Hoanga ,Bostjan Antoncic. Network - Based Research in Entrepreneurship : A Critical Review. Journal of Business Venturing ,2003 ; (18).
[87]Hagedoorn,J.,&Schakenraad, J.The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 1994,1 S(4): 291-310.
[88]Hakansson H.Industrial Technological Development: A Network Approch. London, 1987.
[89]Hamel, G. Competition for competence and inter-parner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 1991(12): 83-103.
[90]Hamel, Heene. Competence-based Competition,New York,John Wiley. 1994.
[91]Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44: 82-111.
[92] Henderson, R. and I. Cockburn Measuring Competence: Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research, Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15: 63-84.
[93]Hirschman, A..A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development in Latin America, New Haven, Yale University Press. 1971.
[94]Hitt, M.A.,Bierman, Shimizu, K., and Kochhar R. Direct and Moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms:a resource-based perspective.Academy of Management journal, 2001,44(1):13-28.
[95]Holton, R. J. Economy and Society, London: Routledge. 1992.
[96]Hoopes DG Postre 1,S. Shared knowledge, "Glitches," and product Development performance.Strategic Management Journal, 1999(20): 837-865.
[97]Hsu, J.Y. A late-industrial district?:Learning network in the Hsinchu science-based industrial park. Taiwa, Ph.D.dissertation, Department of Geography, university of California, Berkeley. 1997.
[98]Huber, G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 1991, 2, 81-115.
[99]Humphrey, J.,&Schmitz, H. The Triple C Approach to Local Industrial Policy. World Devel ,1996,24(12):1859-1877.
[100]Hunt, S.D,and Morgan, R:M. The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition. Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59 (2): 1-15.
[101]Huselid,M.A. and Becker,B.E.High performance work systems and firm performance: cross-sectional versus panel results.Industrial Relations, 1996, 35: 400 - 422.
[102]Huselid, M.A.The impact of Human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal. 1995,38(3):635-672.
[103]Inakai Pena. Intellectual capital and business start-up success. Journal of Intellectual Capital , 2002 , 3 ( 2):180-198.
[104]Jacobs D, Ard-Pieter De Man. Clusters, industrial policy and firm strategy: A menu approach.Technology Anais and Strategic Management, 1996(8): 425-437.
[105]Jarillo. On strategic network. Strategic management journal, 1988, 9(1): 31-41.
[106]Jay Whittaker,Michelle Burns,John Van Beveren. Understanding and measuring the effect of social capital on knowledge transfer within clusters of small-medium enterprises. 16th Annual Conference of Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand. 2003.10.
[107]Jin Chen. Zhaohui Zhu, Hong Yuan Xie. Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study Journal oflntellectual Capital. 2004. 5(1):195-212.
[108]Joia,L.A.Measuring Intangible Corporate Assets: Linking Business Strategy with Intellectual Capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital.2000,1 (1):68-84.
[109]Johannisson, B;Ramirez-Pasillas, M.Topography Model of Human, SocialEntrepreneurship Research Conference,Networking for Entrepreneurship: Building a and Cultural Capital. Presented on Babson College Jonkoping, Sweden, June. 2001.
[110]Johanson, Jon and Lars-Gunnar Mattsson:Internationalization in Industrial Systems-A Network Approach,P446-472.in Neil Hood and J.E.Vanune (eds),Strategies in the Global Competition,Beckenham,Kent:Croom Helm for the Institute of International Business,Stockholm School of Economics. 1988.
[111]Johnson, W. An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital : measuring the stock and flow of intellectual capital in the firm. International journal of Technology management 1999,18(5l61718):562-575.
[112]Juma, Norma A. The relationship between intellectual capital and new venture performance: An empirical investigation of the moderating role of the environment. The University of Texas at Arlington.2005
[113]Kakabadse N K, Kakabadse A,Kouzmin. A.Reviewing the knowledge management literature: towards a taxonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2003, 17(4):75-91.
[114]Kautz, B. Selman, and M. Shah. ReferralWeb: Combining Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering. Communication of The ACM, vol. 30 no. 3, March 1997.
[115]Kee-Bom Nahm. The Spatial Structure of Unplanned Shopping Clusters developed along the Cheonggyechon- ro and the Emergence New Industrial Clusters. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2001, 5(1), 1-13.
[116]Keeble D, Wilkinson F. Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional cluster of high technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Studies, 1999(33): 295-303.
[117]Kieron Meagher, Mark Rogers. Network density and R&D spillovers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2004, 53(1): 237–260.
[118]Kira R. Absorptive Capacity and Innovation: Evidence from Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Firms. Haas School of Business. November 22, 2004.
[119]Klein, B., Crawford, R.G.and Alchian, A, A. Verticalintegration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. The Journal of Law and Economics.1978,21:297-326.
[120]Kliduff, M.,Tsai,W.,Social Networks and Organizations London:Sage,2003.
[121]Kogut, B. The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry, Journal of Industrial Economics, 1989, 38, 183-197.
[122]Kogut, B., Shan, W., and Walker, G.. Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: Learning through networks? In N. Nohria and R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston.HarvardBusiness School Press. 1992: 348-365.
[123]Kogut B,Zander U.What Firms Do Coordination, Identity, and Learning. Organization Science, 1996, 7(5):502-518.
[124]Koka, B. R. and Prescott, J. E., Strategic alliance as social capital: A multidimensional view, Strategic Management Journal, 2002. 23, 795-816.
[125]Krackhardt, D.,Brass D..Intraorganizational networks: the micro side In Wasserman,S. and Galaskiewicz,J.(Eds),Advances in the Social and Behavioral Sciences from Social Network Analysis Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications. 1994.
[126]Krackhardt, D., Stern, R.Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation, Social Psychology Quarterly, 1988, Vol. 51 No. 2: 123-40.
[127]Lee,C., Lee, K. and Pennings,J.M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22: 615-640.
[128]Leenders R. J , Gabbay S M. Corporate Social Capital and Liability. Boston : Kluwer Inc. , 1999.
[129]Li, H. & Atuahene- Gima, K., Product Innovation Strategy and Performance of New Technology Ventures in China, Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(6) :1123-1134.
[130]Li, H. & Atuahene- Gima, K.,The Adoption of Agency Business Activity, Product Innovation and Performance in Chinese Technology Ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 2002(23):469-490.
[131]Liao, Jianwen, Welsch, Harold. Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: a comparison of technology- and non- technology- based nascent entrepreneurs Journal ofHigh Technology Management Research, 2003, Volume: 14, Issue: 1:149- 170.
[132]Lin, N., Building a network theory of social capital, Connections, 1999, 22 .1:28-51.
[133]Lin, N., Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment, American Sociology Review, 1981 , 46, 393-405.
[134]Lissoni. F. Knowledge codification and thegeography of innovation: the case of Brescia mechanical. cluster. Research Policy, 2001, 30: 1479-1500.
[135]MacDuffie,J.P. Human resource bundle and manufacturing performance: organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1995,48: 197-221.
[136]Mahoney, J.T. and Pandian,J.R..The resource-based view within theconversation of strategic management.Strategic Management Journal. 1992, 13(5):363-380.
[137]Majumdar,S.The impact of human capital quality on the boundaries of the firms in the US telecommunications industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1998, 7(4):663-677.
[138]Makusen A R. Sticky places in slippery space :A typology of industrial districts . Economic Geography ,1996, 72: 293 -313.
[139]Marr,B. and Spender,J.C. Measuring knowledge assets--implications ofthe knowledge economy for performance measurement.Measuring Business Excellence. 2004, 8(1): 18-28.
[140]Maskell P. & Malmberg, A. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1999, 23: 167-189.
[141]Mazzola, F. and S. Bruni.The role of linkages in firm performance: Evidence from Southern Italy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2000,Vol. 43, pp. 199-221.
[142]McClelland, D.C.Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs, Journal of Creative Behavior, 1987,21, 219-233.
[143] McEvily B, Zaheer A. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities . Strategic Management Journal,1999,31(4):35-55.
[144]McGrath, R.G., Tsai, M.H., Venkataramen S. and MacMillan, LC. 1996.
[145]Meso,P.and Smith,R..A resource-based view of organizational knowledge management systems. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2000.4(3) 224-234.
[146]Michael D. Social networks and economic sociology: a proposed research agenda for more complete social science, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1997,56(3): 287-302.
[147]Michalisin,M.D., Smith,R.D. and Kline,D.M. In search of strategic assets.The international journal of organizational analysis. 1997, 5(4):360-387.
[148]Michael F, Grit F. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy, 2004, 33(2): 245–255.
[149]Mitchell, J.C. The Concept and Use of Social Networks, in Mitchell, J.C. (ed), Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1969:1-50.
[150]Molina-Morales FX. European industrial districts: influence of geographic concentration on performance of the firm. Journal of International Management, 2001(7): 277-294.
[151]Molina-Morales FX, Mart'mez-Fernandez MT. The impact of industrial district affiliation on firm value creation. European Planning Studies,2003(11): 156-169.
[152]Molina-Morales, F. Xavier and Martinez-Fernandez, M. Teresa.How much difference is there between industrial district firms? A net value creation approach. Research Policy, 2004,33(3): 473-486.
[153]Nadine Massard, Caroline Mehier. Proximity, accessibility to knowledge and innovation. Regional Studies Association International Conference. Gateway 5 Meaning and Role of Proximity Aalborg – 28th May to 31st May 2005.
[154]Nahapiet J. & Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2): 242-266.
[155]Nelson R R,Winter S. An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
[156]Nohria, N.&Garcia-Pont, C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure . Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 1991(12): 105-124.
[157]Nonaka, I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 1994, 5 (1): 14-37.
[158]Nooteboom , V A Gilsing. Density and Strength of Ties in Innovation Net2 works :A Competence and Governance View. Working Paper ,2004
[159]Nunzia Carbonara. Innovation processes within geographical clusters: a cognitive Approach. Technovation, 2004, 24: 17–28.
[160]Olav Sorenson, Jan Rivkin, Lee Fleming. Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow. Harvard Business School Strategy Working Paper Series, 2002.4.
[161]Osborn,R.N.,& Baughn,C.C.Forms of interorganisational governance for multinational alliances.Academy of Management Journal,1990,33(3): 503-519.
[162]Ostgaard, A. and Birley. S. New Venture Growth and Personal Networks. Journal of Business Research 1996,36: 37-50.
[163]Palacios-Marques,D. and Garrigos-Simon,F.J. Validating and measuring IC in the biotechnology and telecommunication industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2003,4(3):332-347.
[164]Park, S. H. and Luo, Y., Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms, Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22, 455-477.
[165]Pena,I. Intellectual capital and business start-up success.Journal of Intellectual capital, 2002,3(2):l 80-198.
[166]Peng, M. W., and Heath, P. The growth ofthe firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy ofManagement Review, 1996,2l (2):492-528.
[167]Pennings,J.M.,Lee,K. and van Witteloostuijn,A.. Human capital, social capital and firm dissolution. Academy of Management Journa1, 1998, 41: 425-440.
[168]Penrose, E. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1959.
[169]Pentland, B. Read me what it says on your screen: The interpretive problem in technical service work. Technology Studies, 1995, 2, 50-79.
[170]Perry-smith J E,Shalley C E.The Soclal Side of Creativty:a Statuc and Dynamlc Soclal Network Perspective.Academy of Management Review, 2003,28(1):89.
[171]Pfeffer, J. Competitive advantage through people, California Management Review, 1994,36 (2):9-28
[172]Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R.. The external control of organizations: Aresource dependence perspective: Harper, New York.1978.
[173]Podolny J. M., & Page, K. L. Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 1998, 24: 57–76.
[174]Podolny J M,Stuart T E,Hannan M T. Networks, knowledge, andniches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry ... Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,1995.
[175]Porter ME. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review 1998(76): 77-90.
[176]Porter,M.E.Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy .Economic Development Quarterly, 2000, 14(1):15-34.
[177]Portes, A., Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Immigration: A Conceptual Overview, The Economic Sociology of Immigration, New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1995.
[178]Powell, W. W. and Brantley P. Competitive Cooperation in biotechnology: learning through networks? in N.form and action, Boston,Nohria and R. Eccles(eds),Networks and Organizations: structure,MA: Harvard Lniversiy Press, 1992, 366-394.
[179]Powell, Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior. 1990, 12:295 - 336.
[180]Prescott, E.C. and M.Visscher.. Organizational Capital. Journal of Political Economy 1980, 88:446-461.
[181]Prusak , L.Where did knowledge management come from ? IBM Systems Journal , 2001,40 (4):1002 – 1007.
[182]Putnam R. D. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal ofDemocracy, 2000, (6): 65-78.
[183]Putnam, R.D. : The prosperous community: social capital and public life, American Prospect, 1993 (13)-35-42.
[184]Pyka. Informal networking and indust riallife cycles. Technovation , 2000 , 20 (1) :25 – 261.
[185]Rajesh S. Upadhyayula. Social capital as an antecedent of absorptive of firms. Paper to be presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2004 on Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development. Elsinore, Denmark, June 14-16, 2004.
[186]Renzulli, L.Aidrich, H.,and Moody, 3. Family matters: Gender, networks andentrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces, 2000,79(2), 523-546.
[187] Riahi-belkaoui. Intellectual Capital and Finn Performance of Multinational Firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital ,2003, (4) :5 - 6.
[188]Rindova, V. and C. Fombrun. Constructing Competitive Advantage: The Role of Firm – Constituent Interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20: 691-710.
[189]Ring, P. S.&Ven, A. H. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations .Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13(7):483-498.
[190]Ritter, T. A Framework for Analyzing Interconnectedness of Relationships. Industrial Marketing Management 2000, 29: 317-326.
[191]Roberts PW, bowling GR. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance.Strategic Management Journal, 2002(23): 1077-1093.
[192]Rothaermel FT. Research note in cumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic management journal, 2001(22):687-699.
[193]Rowley, T. Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences, Academy of Management Review, 1997,22 (4):887-911.
[194]Rowley, Tim, D. Behrens, and D.Krackhardt,Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries, Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21 (3),369-386.
[195]Sabel, C. F. Studies trust: building new forms of co-operation in a volatile economy. In F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger, eds., Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration,. 1992, 215-250. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
[196]Sarkar, M.B., Echambadi, R., and Harrison, J.S.. Alliance Entrepreneurship and Firm Market Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2001,22: 701-712.
[197]Saxenian A. The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy. Amsterdam. 1991, 20(5): 423-438.
[198]Saxenian, Annalee. Regional Advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1994.
[199]Senjem and Reed.. Social Capital And Network Entrepreneurs. Frontiers Of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, Mass. 2002
[200]Servaes,Henri. Tobin's Q and the Gains from Takeovers, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, No. 1.(Mar., 1991), 409-419.
[201]Sham W G&Kogut, B. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(5): 387-394.
[202]Simsek,Michael H ·Lubatkin,Steven W ·Floyd,Inter-firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior:A Structural Embeddednes Perspective,Journal of Management.2003,29(3):427-442.
[203]Skandia. Visualizing intellectual capital in Skandia. A supplement to Skandia's 1994 Annual Report. Sweden,1994.
[204]Skvoretz, J., T.J. Fararo, and F. Agneessens. Advances in Biased Net Theory: Definitions, Derivations, and Estimations.Social Networks, 2004, 26: 113- 139.
[205] Staber, U. Spatial proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial district: the case of knitwear firms in Baden-Wurttemberg, Regional Studies, 2001, 35,329-341.
[206]Steinter M, The discreet charm of clusters: An introduction. In: Steinter EM. (ed.) Clusters and Regional Specialisation On Geography Technology and Networks, 1998:1-17.
[207] Stewart, T. A. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, New York:Doubleday Currency,1997.
[208]Stewart, F. and Ghani, E.. How significant are externalities for development?, World Development, 1991,19(6):569–94.
[209]Storper M, Scott A. The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes. In: Wolch, J., Dear, M. (Eds.), The Power of Geography: How Territory Shapes Social Life Social Reproduction. Unwin and Hyman, Boston, MA, 1989: 21-40.
[210]Stuart, T.E., Hoang, H.& Hybels, R.C. Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999(44): 315-349.
[212]Sveiby, K. E. The New Organization Wealth: Management and Measuring Knowledge-based Assets Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1997.
[213]Swart, J. Intellectual capital: disentangling an enigmatic concept. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2006,7, 2:136-159.
[214]Swedberg , R. New Economic Sociology : What has Been Accomplished , What is Ahead ? . Acta Sociologica , 1997 , (40) :161～182.
[215]Sternberg . Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1985Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 607- 627.
[216]Taylor, M., Enterprise, Power and Embeddedness:An Empirical Exploration, in Vatne,Taylor(eds.),The Networked Firm in a Global World: Small Firms in New Enviornment, Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate, 2000: 199-233.
[217]Teece,D.J.Managing intellectual capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions. Oxford:Oxford University Press. 2000.
[218]Teece, D, Pisano G. and Shuen, A.. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.Strategic Management Journal, 1997,Vol. l 8, No 7.
[219]Thorelli, H. Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies, Strategic Management Journal.1986,7(1): 37–51.
[220]Thursby. What Do We Say about Ourselves and What Does It Mean? Yet Another Look at Economics Department Research, Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, 2000 vol. 38(2):383-404.
[221]Todeva E. Analysis of Business Network Dynamics, Presented at the 6th Annual Organization Science Winter Conference, Keystone, Colorado, US. 2000,9-13.
[222]Tsai W., & Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41: 464–476.
[223]Tsai, W. Knowledge Transfer in Intra-organizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44: 996-1004.
[224]Ulrich,D.Intellectual capital=competence*commitment. Sloan Management Review 1998,39(2):15-26.
[225]Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 35-67.
[226]Uzzi, B. Social relations and networks in the making of financial capital[J]. Amer Soc. Rev.1999(64):481-505.
[227] Vatne E, Taylor M. The Networked Firm in a Global World: Small Firms in New Environments . Aldershot: Ashgate,2000.
[228]Walter,A., Mu''11er,T.A., Helfert,G.,& Ritter,T. Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality. Industrial Marketing Management , 2003,32 (2): 159- 169.
[229]Weinzimmer, L. G., Nystrom, P. C. and Freeman, S. J.Measuring organizational growth: Issues, consequences and guidelines. Journal of Management, 1998, 24(2), 235-262.
[230]Wen-Ying Wang; Chingfu Chang.Intellectual capital and performance in causal models: Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan.Journal of Intellectual Capital; 2005; 6, 2; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 222-236.
[231]Wong Siu - lun, Salaff W. Network capital: emigration from Hong Kong . British Journal of Sociology, 1998,49(3) :358 - 375.
[232]Wright,P.M.,McMahan,G.C.,and sustained competitive advantage: McWilliams, A..Human resources and a resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 1994, 5:301-326.
[233]Yeung, H.Critical reviews of geographical perspectives on business organisations and the organisation of production: towards a network approach, Progress in Human Geography, 1994, 18(4), 460-490.
[234]Yli-Renko H., Autio, E. & Sapienza, H. J. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22: 587-613.
[235]Youndt M. A.,Subramaniam M.& Snell S. A.2004. Intellectual Capital Profiles: An Examination of Investments and Returns, Journal of Management Studies,41(2):335-361.
[236]Zhao, L. and Aram, J.D.Networking and growth of young technology -intensive ventures in China. Journal of Business Venturing, 1995,10(5), 349-370.
[237]安素霞.社会资本对人力资本的整合效应. 中国人口科学,2005 年增刊:111-114.
[238]边燕杰和丘海雄,企业的社会资本及功效,中国社会科学,2000(2): 87-99.
[239]蔡铂,聂鸣.社会网络对产业集群技术创新的影响,科学学与科学技术 管理,2003年第7期:56-60.
[240]蔡禾.2003都市社会学研究范式之比较-人类生态学与都市社会学,学术论坛,2003年第3期.
[241]蔡华林.企业集群内社会资本演进的动力机制研究.财经论丛,2005 年第6 期:76-84.
[242]蔡莉,刘彤,赵英才.高技术产业开发区凝聚经济效益模型.吉林工业大学学报,1994 年第 4 期:47-53.
[243]蔡宁, 吴结兵.产业集群组织间关系密集性的社会网络分析,浙江大学学报,2006年7月.第36 卷第4 期:58-65.
[244]蔡秀玲,林竞君。基于网络嵌入性的集群生命周期研究——一个新经济社会学的视角,经济地理,2005 年 3 月:281-284.
[245]陈鸽林. 基于博弈论的企业战略网络研究.广东工业大学硕士论文,2006.
[246]陈旭.基于产业集群的技术创新扩散研究.管理学报,2005 年第 3 期:333-336.
[247]陈艳莹,原毅军,柏丹.企业价值导向的智力资本分类与管理. 软科学,2005 年.第 19 卷,第 3 期:71-74.
[248]程承坪、王飞军、黄小平,人力资本投资风险探讨,人才开发,2001年2月.
[249]程国萍,熊云生,吴敏.社会网络与社会资本财贸研究,2005年第4期:115-116.
[250]成树芬.企业智慧资产管理--提升为知识企业的良方.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003年版
[251]邓莉,梅洪常.溢出效应与企业簇群创新机制的构建,企业经济,2004年第4期:132-134
[252]冯邦彦, 方红. 关于企业“组织资本”的理论分析. 经济学动态, 2005,(10).
[253]冯进路,冯绍彬.企业核心能力刚性的产生及其克服.科研管理。2005年3 月,第26卷第2期:120-125.
[254]冯天学,张庆普,闫相斌.企业知识资本系统的结构与功能.科学学与科学技术管理,2006 年第 7 期:93-97.
[255]冯亚明.基于人力资本的构成谈产业集群有利于职业经理人才队伍的成长.企业家天地,2006 年第 9 期:114-115.
[256]付彦.企业知识管理论的历史研究与发展.经济与管理研究,2004 年第 6期:57-59.
[257]高展军,李垣.战略网络结构对企业技术创新的影响研究.科学学研究, 2006 年,第 24 卷,第 3 期:474-479.
[258]耿帅. 基于共享性资源观的集群企业竞争优势研究.浙江大学博士论文,2005 年 4 月.
[259]龚绍东. 产业集群“蜂巢型结构”形态的实证分析. 中国工业经济, 2005, (10).
[260]郭保伟.知识管理与图书馆.中国西部科技,2007 年第 1 期:90-92.
[261]郭劲光、高静美,网络、资源与竞争优势:一个企业社会学视角下的观点,中国工业经济,2003年第3期:79-86.
[262]顾慧君,王文平.基于社会网络的内生型产业集群演化解释.现代管理科学,2005年第12期:27-29.
[263]何亚琼,葛中锋,苏竣.区域创新网络中组织间学习机制研究.学术交流,2006 年第 2 期:63-68.
[264]贺寨平.国外社会支持网研究综述.国外社会科学,2001年第1期。
[265]胡凤玲,上官学进,周艳. 网络资源与企业技术创新集群竞争优势. 审计与经济研究,第 20 卷第 1 期,2005 年 1 月:88-90.
[266]惠宁.知识溢出的经济效应研究.西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007年1月,第37卷第1期,25-29.
[267]黄汉民著.企业发展的组织资源能力研究.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2003.
[268]黄洁. 集群企业成长中的网络演化.浙江大学博士论文,2005年10月.
[269]黄海云,陈莉平. 嵌入社会网络的企业集群结构及其优势. 现代管理科学,2005年第5期:70-71.
[270]吉国秀,王伟光. 产业集群与区域竞争合作机制:一种基于社会网络的分析,中国科技论坛,2006年第3期:95-99.
[271]贾生华,邹爱其,张学华.企业集群化成长障碍调查——以浙江省为例.经济理论与经济管理,2003年第7期:69-74.
[272]蒋春燕,赵曙明.社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用——江苏与广东新兴企业的实证研究.管理世界,2006 年第 10期:90-112.
[273]金峻岭. 智力资本测度及其对企业绩效影响研究.浙江大学硕士论文,2005年12月.
[274]康世瀛. 产业集群与供应链形成发展的基础推动力信任, 科技进步与对策2005年第1期:146-148.
[275]兰洁颖. 基于企业、市场与网络的核心能力功能——一个文献综述,当代经济(下半月),2006 年 12 期:43-44.
[276]兰玉杰陈晓剑.人力资本与企业所有权安排的合约选择.数量经济技术经济研究,2003,(11):18-22.
[277]雷如桥,陈继祥.集群网络研究:一个社会网络理论的视角.经济问题探索,2004 年第 12 期:130-131.
[278]李钟文,威廉·米勒等.硅谷优势:创新与创业精神的栖息地.北京:人民出版社,2002,8.
[279]李树茁,韦 艳,任义科. 基于整体网络视角的农民工行为影响因素分析,2007年第1期:10-18.
[280]李冬琴,智力资本与企业绩效的关系研究,浙江大学博士论文.2004.
[281]李惠斌和杨雪冬,社会资本与社会发展,北京,社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[282]李霄.珠三角民营企业产业演进与集群化成长的机制研究. 佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版), 2005 年 11 月,第 23 卷第 6 期:32-35.
[283]李新春.企业家协调与企业集群——对珠江三角洲专业企业集群化成长的分析.南开管理评论,2002 年 03 期 :49-55.
[284]李新春.企业集群化成长的资源能力获取与创造.学术研究,2002 年第 7期:10-12.
[285]李新春,企业联盟与网络,广州:广东人民出版社,2000 年.
[286]刘存福,侯光明,李存金.中小民营企业集群的社会网络分析及发展趋势探讨。科学学与科学技术管理,2005 年第 7 期:144-148.
[287]刘东.企业网络论.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:238-239.
[288]刘仁军. 交易成本、社会资本与企业网络,华中科技大学博士论文.2004.
[289]林竞君.嵌入性、社会网络与产业集群——一个新经济社会学的视角.经济经纬,2004 年第 5 期:45-48.
[290]刘国武,李卫星.知识企业的主导生产要素:知识资本——基于“概念格”理论的推论. 财经研究,2006 年,第 32 卷第 12 期:130-139.
[291]刘辉.竞争环境下企业知识管理研究——兼以我国集群企业为例分析.情报杂志,2005 年第 4 期:36-37.
[292]刘军.社会网络分析导论.北京:社会科学文献出版社.2004 年 12 月.
[293]林嵩、姜彦福.结构方程模型理论及其在管理研究中的应用,科学学与科学技术管理,2006 年第 2 期:38-41.
[294]林润辉.网络组织与企业高成长,天津:南开大学出版社,2004年.
[295]鲁开垠.产业集群社会网络的根植性与核心能力研究.广东社会科学,2006 年第 2 期:41-46.
[296]卢福财,周鹏. 外部网络化与企业组织创新. 中国工业经济,2004 年第2 期:101-106.
[297]罗家德.NQ 风暴--企业关系管理的智能.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002 年 8.
[298]罗家德.社会网分析讲义。北京:社会科学文献出版社. 2005.
[299]罗文军,傅平,陆玮.战略联盟的组织学习机制. 经济管理,2004 年 3月第 6 期:16-20.
[300]马歇尔.经济学原理,北京:商务印书馆,1991 年.
[301]毛蕴诗,周燕.硅谷机制与企业高速成长——再论企业与市场之间的关系,管理世界,2002 年第 6 期.102-108.
[302]马刚.基于战略网络视角的产业区企业竞争优势研究——以浙江两个典型的传统优势产业区为例。浙江大学博士论文,2005年10月.
[303]宁继鸣. 知识型企业人力资本激励问题的特殊性. 山东大学学报.2006年第6期:92-98.
[304]宁凌. 企业人力资本运作机制研究. 华中农业大学博士论文,2003年5月.
[305]聂鸣,梅丽霞,鲁莹.班加罗尔软件产业集群的社会资本研究.研究与发展管理,2004年4月,第16卷第2期:46-49.
[306]牛飞亮.西方企业网络理论的产生及其范式创新.企业导报.1999 年第 2期:43-36.
[307]彭正银.网络治理理论探析.中国软科学 2002 年第 3 期:50-54.
[308]潘锡辉,魏谷.关于当前国家高新区发展若干问题探讨.经济问题探索,2007年第3期:178-181.
[309]祁红梅,庞世俊,王惠东.基于合作的主动知识外溢策略研究.科学管理研究,2004 年第 8 期:70-73.
[310]邱均平等.论知识管理与竞争情报.图书情报工作,2000第4期:11-14.
[311]芮明杰. 新企业成长的内生性资源:智力资本.学术月刊,2006年4月:91-95.
[312]斯密.国富论,中译本,西安:陕西人民出版社,2001年版.
[313]宋竞. 智力资本与企业竞争优势研究.四川大学硕士论文.2003 年.
[314]舒尔茨.人力资本投资,载于舒尔茨.人力资本投资--教育和研究的作用.北京:商务印书馆.1990.
[315]苏英,穆荣平,宋河发,王琴.高技术产业集群的竞争优势论. 科学学与科学技术管理,2007年第2期:120-126.
[317]谭露.高新技术产业集群中社会资本的来源及作用.经济师,2006年第2期:76-77.
[318]陶守强,依托产业集群的企业成长机制研究商业研究.2006年第10 期:164-166.
[319]王华,张阳,戴薇.社会网络嵌入性视角的产业集群竞争优势探析. 科技进步与对策, 2006 年 01 期:77-79.
[320]王辑慈.创新的空间企业集群与区域发展.北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[321]王芹.硅谷信息科技产业集群的社会资本研究. 河南大学学报,2006 年 3 月,第 46 卷,第 2 期:66-69.
[322]王霄宁.基于社会网络分析的产业集群建模及实证检验. 系统工程.2005 年第3 期:115-119.
[323]王江龙.基于创新网络的产业集群内技术创新过程模式研究.浙江大学硕士论文,2004年12月.
[324]王勇,许庆瑞.智力资本及其测度研究.研究与发展管理,2002,2:56-61.
[325]王双龙.浅析组织资本对企业绩效的影响.财会月刊(理论版),2006年第11期:53-54.
[326]王越.组织内社会网络的知识传导及成本研究.科学管理研究,2004 年第8 期:75-77.
[327]韦伯. 工业区位论. 北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[328]魏晓栋, 姚春序.产业集群视角下的人力资本指标体系的构建,浙江理工大学学报,第 24 卷,第 2 期, 2007 年 3 月:211-215.
[329]魏后凯.对产业集群与竞争力关系的考察,经济管理,2003 第 6 期:4-11.
[330]魏江.产业集群-创新系统与技术学习.北京:科学出版社,2003 年.
[331]邬爱其.集群企业网络化成长机制研究—对浙江三个产业集群的实证研究,浙江大学博士论文,2004 年 12 月.
[332]吴强军. 浙江省中小企业集群化成长影响因素实证研究. 浙江大学硕士论文,2004年6月.
[333]吴冰,王重鸣.知识和知识管理:一个文献综述.华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006年第1期:57-61.
[334]吴结兵. 基于企业网络结构与动态能力的产业集群竞争优势研究. 浙江大学博士论文,2006 年 4 月.
[335]许小虎. 基于企业能力的自我中心型战略网络研究. 浙江大学博士论文,2006 年 4 月.
[336]许小虎,项保华.企业网络理论发展脉络与研究内容综述.科研管理,2006年 1 月,第 27 卷第 1 期:114-120.
[337]姚小涛,席酉民.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版) ,2003 ,(9) :22 - 27.
[338]姚莉英.企业创新体系中的人力资本。创业者,2006年12期:18-21,科学学研究,2002年第3期:272-27.
[339]杨淑娥,袁春生,丁善明.高科技企业集群化成长的资源获取与资源供给缺失. 科技管理研究,2006 年第 8 期:76-78.
[340]俞凯华.基于产业集群的高新区发展导向研究科技进步与对策.2006 年 1月号:59-61.
[341]虞剑文 , 朱晓军 , 丁玉芹。复杂性科学视角下的组织与组织资本,发展战略,2006 年第 4 期,第 19 卷总第 112 期:61.
[342]张炳申,马建会.珠江三角洲中小企业集群化成长的问题及对策.统计与预测,2003 年第 5 期:4-7.
[343]张海燕; 李曼妮.企业集群内核心企业成长分析.中国市场,2006 年第 49期:50-51.
[344]张炜. 中小高技术企业创业知识资本与成长绩效关系研究. 浙江大学博士论文,2005 年 4 月.
[345]张伟峰,万威武,白靖宇.网络资本:硅谷群发展的核心能力.科学学研究, 第20卷,第6期,2002年12月:631-634.
[346]郑美群. 基于智力资本的高技术企业绩效形成机理研究. 吉林大学博士论文,2006 年 12 月.
[347]朱国宏.经济社会学.上海.复旦大学出版社.2003.
[348]朱海就,陆立军,袁安府.从企业网络看产业集群竞争力差异的原因——浙江和意大利产业集群的比较.软科学,2004年第18卷第1期:53-56.
[349]朱秀梅. 知识溢出、吸收能力对高技术产业集群创新的影响研究.吉林大学博士论文,2006 年 7 月.