“住有所居”的比较研究与思考
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
当前我国已进入改革发展关键期,经济体制深刻变革,社会结构深刻变动,利益格局深刻调整,思想观念深刻变化。这种空前的社会变革,既给经济社会发展进步带来巨大活力,同时也带来诸多矛盾与问题。其中,诸如住房、教育、社会保障等民生问题伴随着经济社会发展而日益突出。
     党的十七大报告将“住有所居”作为改善民生为重点的社会建设的重要内容和重要目标,把握了民生问题的关键。衣食住行,为人的基本生活所必需。安居才能乐业,安身才能立命,无论是定居还是流动,人类都需要解决住房问题。住房问题关系到经济平稳健康发展,关系到社会和谐稳定。各国政府都把解决居民住房问题作为重要的施政目标。
     我国住房市场化改革作为经济体制改革的重要组成部分,对于改善城镇居民的居住条件、促进房地产及相关行业与市场的繁荣发展,推动国民经济的发展起着极大的推动作用。但是,我国住房市场上商品房一枝独秀,且房价节节攀升;同时,保障型住房建设短缺。如果没有国家的扶助,低收入人群和弱势群体仅凭借市场力量根本无法获得一套合适的住房。单纯的市场机制不能解决全体居民的不同住房需求,使每位居民“住有所居”,政府责无旁贷。
     同样变计划经济体制为市场经济体制的中东欧转型国家——波兰、捷克、匈牙利,在转型初期也出现了类似的问题:市场机制在为居民提供更多住房选择的同时,也使中低收入者和弱势群体面对住房这一人生中最昂贵的商品而望房兴叹。本文紧紧围绕波兰、捷克、匈牙利三个中东欧转型国家在经济转型期如何实现“住有所居”这一重要主题,总体分三大部分进行论述。
     第一部分,是导论,即第一章,由问题的提出与研究意义、国内外研究状况、本文的逻辑结构、研究方法与创新之处组成。
     第二部分,即第二章、第三章、第四章,是本文的重点章节,分别介绍了三个国家转型前后的住房政策演变过程,及住房市场化改革的过程,指出住房市场化改革在提高住房建设和分配效率的同时,也使低收入者和弱势群体的住房承受力降低。波、捷、匈三国政府坚持商品房与保障房建设两手抓,充分体现了中东欧转型国家住房市场化改革过程中的民生定位。
     波兰,是这三个中东欧国家中国土面积最大、人口最多的国家。由于大批住房在二战中遭到破坏,波兰也是住房短缺最严重的国家。住房市场化改革使波兰的住房建设有所恢复,并不断发展,尤其是个人建房比例极高;住房金融体系日益完善;人民的居住水平较转型前获得了较大提高。与此同时,波兰政府在住房领域的扶持从未放松,尤其是在保障中低收入者和弱势群体住房权利的公共租赁住房建设上。目前波兰已形成保障型住房建设的长期机制,由社会住房协会负责建造、管理,由国家设立多项公共基金为其发放优惠贷款,提供信贷保障,专门扶助保障型住房的建设。这是波兰住房市场化改革过程中住房政策上最突出的特点。
     住房市场化改革使捷克住房由原来的国家统一建造与分配转为主要由住房市场提供,住房金融体系逐步建立起来并不断发展完善,为居民建、购房提供多种住房融资工具。住房建设不断增加,房地产市场日益活跃;捷克居民居住条件获得极大改善。在转型的第一个10年里,捷克政府在商品房与保障型住房建设上均有新政策出台,但重点推动商品房建设。2000年以来,捷克政府逐步认识到市场化并不能解决全体居民的住房问题,低收入人群和弱势群体必须依靠政府的援助才能实现“住有所居”。捷克民生定位下的保障型住房建设层次分明,目标群体定位清晰,政府财政投入巨大,保证了保障型住房的建设与分配效率。在这三个国家20余年的经济转型过程中,捷克住房政策向民生定位转变的态度最坚决,保障人群全面而具体,保障型住房政策实施效果显著。
     匈牙利是一个有着悠久的自有住房传统的国家。转型前,其住房自有率是三个国家中最高的。转型初期,匈牙利住房市场化改革的政策重点是刺激住房建设与投资,完善住房金融体系,为购、建房者提供多种融资工具,同时政府为其提供多种补贴,鼓励他们拥有一套自有住房。保障型住房建设在转型的最初10年里无任何进展,相反却随着住房私有化的推进而大幅度缩减,所剩无几。进入新世纪以来,匈牙利政府意识到保障型住房的缺失使低收入人群和弱势群体的住房需求无法得到充分满足,连续出台多项保障型住房扶持方案。这些方案有成功的,也有以失败告终的,但是匈牙利政府一直没有放弃对保障型住房建设的扶持,始终关注着低收入人群和弱势群体住房需求的变化,努力做到“居者有其屋”。
     第三部分即第五章,对波兰、捷克、匈牙利在住房市场化过程中的住房市场化特征和住房政策进行了比较,分析了三个国家政府干预的侧重点的不同,最后总结了对于同处于经济转型期的中国住房改革的启示与借鉴。
     总体看来,由于社会历史背景和经济转型战略的不同,中东欧三个转型国家在住房市场化改革过程中的住房政策各具特色,但归纳起来有一个共有的特征,那就是在推动住房市场化的同时,各国政府高度重视中低收入者和弱势群体的住房需求,加大财政投入力度,保障社会各阶层的住房权利,努力实现人人“住有所居”。
Currently, China has entered a crucial period in the process of reform anddevelopment. As a result, dramatic changes have been witnessed in the economicsystem, social structure, interest pattern and ideology, which has brought enormousvitality as well as problems to the economic and social development. Therefore,issues concerning people's livelihood, such as house price, educational equality,ecosystem and social security, have become increasingly prominent, whoseresolution will reinforce the establishment of a harmonious society.
     Housing problems has been highlighted as the key issue in social constructionin the Report to the Seventeenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China.The situation of basic necessities of life, food, clothing, housing and transportation,can directly influence people's living standard, cost, experience and expectation. Andthe constant improvement in all these necessities is the essential part in developmentof human society. Only with the solving of housing problems can people live inpeace and enjoy their work.
     Housing problem is not only related to people's lives but also to economy andpolitics, which has a great impact on people's living condition, economicdevelopment and social stability. Governments all over the world have regarded it asan important issue and tried every means to achieve improvement these aspects.
     As an essential part in the reform of economic system, the reforms in China'shousing market will greatly improve the people's living condition, promote theprosperity of the real estate industry and related industries and markets andaccelerate the national economic development. However, with the ever-increasingprice and a lack of affordable housing projects, the low-income group and thedisadvantaged group will never buy their own houses without the financial aid of thegovernment, which means a single market mechanism can not cater for differentneeds of all residents and government surely has a role to play.
     Likewise, similar problems also arise in the early period of transformation in those central and eastern European countries like Poland, Hungary and CzechRepublic where market economy has taken the place of planned economy. In thedissertation, the author analyses the evolvement of the reforms and policies andwould like to expound the governments' roles and responsibilities in dealing with theexisting problems in order to realize the entitled right of every member in thesociety.
     This dissertation consists of three parts:
     Part one raises the topic, explains the significance of the study, and presents aliterature review and introduces the structure and methodology.
     Part two includes chapter two, chapter three and four, which respectivelyintroduces housing policies and the evolvement of housing reform, points out thathousing market enhances the efficiency of construction and allotment and also takenotice of the needs of low-income and disadvantaged groups. In addition, thegovernments' intervention and generous grants show the change in the orientationtowards people's life.
     Poland has the biggest area and the most population among these threecountries. Due to World WarⅡ, plenty of houses in Poland were destroyed whichlead to the serious shortage of housing. The reform in housing market made housesconstruction recovered and kept developed, which has bettered the people’s livingcondition. Meanwhile, the Polish government carried out the long-term affordablehousing policy which included that TBS was responsible for building andarrangement of the house, and the government set up different sort of funds toprovide preferential loans, supporting construction of the affordable housing. Themeasures taken by the Polish government were the most prominent among the threetransforming countries.
     The reform in housing market in Czech Republic caused that the houses havebeen provided by the housing market instead of the government which builded anddistributed the houses before the reform. The improvement in living condition andthe increasing invigoration in real estate market in Czech Republic were broughtabout during the reform in housing market proceeding. Since2000, the Czechgovernment has been aware that housing problem cannot be sovled only by the market, and that the low-income group and the disadvantaged group must obtainthe financial aid to get their own living houses. In the three countries, Czech housingpolicy were set upon the people’s livelihood,and the affordable housing policyattained the best effect. Czech affordable housing policy made the housingconstruction positioned to family living different level, and assured the fairness ofthe housing distribution.
     In Hungary, there is tradition for the family to possess their own house, andbefore the social transformation, the percentage of family owning houses kept thehighest level among the three countries. Hungarian reform in housing market paidattention to variety of financing instruments, and offered sorts of subsidiaries toencourage family to have their own house. As the result of the house privatizing andmarketing, the affordable houses decreased dramatically, almost depleted. Since2000, Hungarian government has been aware of the seriousness that the scarity ofaffordable housing cannot cater for the demands of the low-income group and thedisadvantaged group, and proposed a lot of programs to sustain the affordablehousing. However, some of the programs succeeded, some failed, Hungariangovernment has never given up support of the affordable housing construction, paidclose attention to change in demand of housing of the low-income group and thedisadvantaged group, and taken efforts to achieve the goal of each family havinghouse to live..
     Part three contains chapter five, which compares the housing markets'characteristics and related policies, analyzes the different focuses of individualgovernment and makes recommendations to the housing reform in China.
引文
①本书编写组:《十七大报告辅导读本》).北京:人民出版社,2007.36
    ①马克思恩格斯全集(第3卷).北京:人民出版社,1973..42
    ①冯俊.住房与住房政策.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.51~53
    ②冯俊.住房与住房政策.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.53~54
    ①冯俊.住房与住房政策.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.45~47
    ①孙学玉.当代中国民生问题研究.北京:人民出版社,2010.206
    ②孙学玉.当代中国民生问题研究.北京:人民出版社,2010.206
    ①马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷).北京:人民出版社,1995.18
    ②马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷).北京:人民出版社,1995.73
    ①马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷).北京:人民出版社,1995.32
    ①马克思恩格斯选集(第2卷).北京:人民出版社,1995.470
    ②恩格斯.英国工人阶级状况.北京:人民出版社,1956.83~84
    ③马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷).北京:人民出版社,1995.485
    ①高德平.列国志·波兰.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.6~8
    ②高德平.列国志·波兰.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.14~15
    ①高德平.列国志·波兰.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.13~14
    ②OECD,OECD Publishing,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2004).OECDEconomic Surveys: Poland-Volume2004Issue10.OECD Publishing
    ①OECD,OECD Publishing,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.OECD EconomicSurveys: Poland-Volume2010Issue12.OECD Publishing.2010.
    ②OECD,OECD Publishing,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.OECD EconomicSurveys: Poland-Volume2009Issue12.OECD Publishing.2009.
    ①David Clapham.Housing privatization in Eastern Europe.Greenwood Publishing Group,1996.
    ①Supan, A., Stahl, K. Do Savings Programs Dedicated to Home Ownership Increase Personal Savings?. J.Public Econ.44,1991.245~248.
    ②Handorf, W. Development of a Regulatory Policy Framework for Real Estate Lending: Review of UnitedStates Regulations and Lessons Learned for Poland. Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.1998.
    ①Bryx, Marek.Some Elements of the US Housing Policy and Possibilities to Adopt Them in Poland.2004.
    ①Laszek.Jacek..The development of the bank housing finance system for individuals in Poland.2004.
    ②Hegedus, J., Mayo, S., Tosics, I. Transition of the Housing Sector in the East-Central European Countries.Budapest: USAID.1996.
    ①Stuart Lowe,S.,Tsenkova. Housing change in East and Central Europe: integration or fragmentation,AshgatePublishing, Ltd,2003.
    ①Malpezzi, S., Mayo, S. K. Housing and Urban Development Indicators: A Good Idea Whose Time HasReturned. Real Estate Econ.1997.
    ②Hosier, Amy, Hanna Matras,Christopher Banks. Report on the Status of the Polish Housing Sector. UrbanInstitute Project No.06127-213, Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.1995
    ③Muziol-Weclawowicz, Alina and Irena Herbst.Social Rental Housing in Transitional Economy–PolishExperiences. Paper presented at the ENHR2000Conference, June.2000.
    ①Merrill, S., Lea, M., Chiquier, L., Brzeski, W. J., Rabenhorst, C., Mikelsons, M., McLennan, D.,Mayo, S.,Turner, B., et al. Building on Progress: The Future of Housing Finance in Poland. Warsaw: Urban InstituteConsortium for USAID.2010.
    ①Buckley, R.,S. Tsenkova. Housing Market Systems in Reforming Socialist Economies: ComparativeIndicators of Performance and Policy. European Housing Policy.2001.
    ②Merrill, S. Home Purchase in the Visegrad Countries: The Case of Poland, in (R, Struyk, Ed.), HomeOwnership and Housing Finance Policy in the Former Soviet Bloc: Costly Populism. Washington, DC: UrbanInstitute Press.2000.
    ③Merrill, S. R., Lea, M., Diamond, D., Sickles-Grabowska, M., Aukward, K., Kozlowski, E., Laszek,J.,Lawrence, R. Public Sector Housing Finance Policy Strategies for Poland. Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortiumfor USAID.2001.
    ①Housing Statistics in the European Union2004. National Board of Housing, Building and Planning, Sweden:February2005.
    ①Barek R. Examples of social standards of the social housing, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznanskiej-Architektura Urbanistyka7/2006, Poznan,2006.
    ②Duncan, D..“The Collection, Dissemination, and Importance of Mortgage Market Data.”U.S. MortgageBankers Association for the Polish Banks Association,2010.
    ①Duncan, D..“The Collection, Dissemination, and Importance of Mortgage Market Data.”U.S. MortgageBankers Association for the Polish Banks Association,2010.
    ①Merrill, S. R., Lea, M., Diamond, D., Sickles-Grabowska, M., Aukward, K., Kozlowski, E., Laszek,J., andLawrence, R. Public Sector Housing Finance Policy Strategies for Poland. Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortiumfor USAID,2009.
    ①Merrill, S. R., Lea, M., Diamond, D., Sickles-Grabowska, M., Aukward, K., Kozlowski, E., Laszek,J., andLawrence, R. Public Sector Housing Finance Policy Strategies for Poland. Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortiumfor USAID,2009.
    ②Bennett, Christopher. Developing Real Estate Markets in Central and Eastern Europe.”International Journal ofReal Estate Finance1(1),2000,32~39.
    ①Black, Rebecca, Krzysztof Jaszczolt, and Michael Lee,“Solving the Housing Problem: Lessons from Polandand Hungary in Creating a New Housing Finance System,” US AID/Warsaw, June2000.
    ②Merrill, S. R., Lea, M., Diamond, D., Sickles-Grabowska, M., Aukward, K., Kozlowski, E., Laszek,J., andLawrence, R. Public Sector Housing Finance Policy Strategies for Poland. Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortiumfor USAID,2009.
    ①Black, Rebecca, Krzysztof Jaszczolt, and Michael Lee,“Solving the Housing Problem: Lessons from Polandand Hungary in Creating a New Housing Finance System,” US AID/Warsaw, June2000.
    ②Black, Rebecca, Krzysztof Jaszczolt, and Michael Lee,“Solving the Housing Problem: Lessons from Polandand Hungary in Creating a New Housing Finance System,” US AID/Warsaw, June2000.
    ②Barek R. Examples of social standards of the social housing,,Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznanskiej-Architektura Urbanistyka7/2006, Poznan2010.
    ①陈广嗣.列国志·捷克.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.2~3
    ①陈广嗣.列国志·捷克.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.9~15
    ②陈广嗣.列国志·捷克.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.23~33
    ③陈广嗣.列国志·捷克.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.22
    ①陈广嗣.列国志·捷克.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.21
    ①光明日报.2004.1.19
    ②陈广嗣、姜琍.列国志·捷克.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.121
    ②Mandic, S.. Trends in central east European rented sectors. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,15(3),.2000.217~231.
    ①Dubel, A.. Housing subsidy expenditures in the Czech Republic public expenditure review for the CzechRepublic. Washington, DC: World Bank.2000.
    ②Lux et al. Housing Standards: Financial Affordability and Attitudes towards Housing.2003.
    ①National Control Office. The use of financial sources of the state budget assigned on programs of housingconstruction and housing. Bulletin of the National Control Office No.2. Prague: NKU.2006,153~188.
    ①Donner, Ch. Housing policies in central Eastern Europe. Vienna: Donner.2006.
    ①Mare P. The problem of the poor take-up of social benefits.2001
    ②Lux, M. Efficiency and effectiveness of housing policies in the central and eastern Europe countries. EuropeanJournal of Housing Policy,3(3).2003,243~265
    ①Lux, M.. Social housing in the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia. European Journal of Housing Policy,
    1(2).2001,189~209
    ①李丹琳.列国志·匈牙利.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.7~11
    ①李丹琳.列国志·匈牙利.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.19~22
    ②李丹琳.列国志·匈牙利.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.17~18
    ①李丹琳.列国志·匈牙利.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006:15
    ①OECD,OECD Publishing,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development:OECD EconomicSurveys: Hungary-Volume2010Issue6,OECD Publishing,2010
    ②OECD,OECD Publishing,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development:OECD EconomicSurveys: Hungary-Volume2011Issue6,OECD Publishing,2011
    ①Hegedus, J.,Tosics, I., Mayo, S..Transition of the Housing Sector in the East Central European Countries.Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies,1996.
    ①Hegedüs, J., S. Mayo, I. Tosics. Transition of the Housing Sector in the East Central European Countries”Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies,1996
    ①Housing Conditions. National survey of the Central Statistical Office of Hungary. Budapest.2002
    ②www.polandhousingfinance.org/pdfs/Hungary_The_Evolution_of_Housing_Finance_Policy.pdf. AccessedNovember14,2005.
    ①Vas, Nagyne Erzsebet and Gergely Kiss.“Housing Financein Hungary.” Paper presented at the OECDWorkshopon Housing Finance. December5,2009.
    ②Sykora, Ludek. Housing System, Housing Policy and Housebuilding; In The Czech Republic andPrague.Housing Policy in Europe. P. Balchin, ed. London: Routledge,2006
    ①Donner, C.. Housing Policies in Central Eastern Europe. Wiena published bc C.Donner,2005
    ①Housing Statistics in the European Union2001. National Board of Housing, Building and Planning, Sweden:February2002.
    ②Oxley, M.. Housing Investment and Social Housing: a European Comparison. Paper at the ENHRCECODHASWorkshop “Changing Social Rented Housing in Europe”. Nunspeet (the Netherlands),2006.
    ①Chiquier, L. Dual Index Mortgages: Conditions of Sustainable CSO.1997.; Statistical Yearbook of Hungary1996, Budapest: Hungarian Central Statistical Office.
    ①Hungary: Financial System Stability Assessment Update Including a Report on the Observance of Standardsand Codes on Insurance Regulation.” International Monetary Fund, June2005.
    ①Remarks from the Eastern European Workshop on Housing Finance and Housing Affordability. Budapest:2009
    ①赵乃斌,朱晓中.《东欧经济大转轨》.北京:中国经济出版社,1995年
    ①Maclennan, D., Stephens, M., Kemp., P. Housing Policy in the EU Member States. European ParliamentDirectorate General for Research, Social Affairs Series. Working Document14. Luxembourg.1997
    ②Oxley, M. Housing Investment and Social Housing: a European Comparison. Paper at the ENHRCECODHASWorkshop “Changing Social Rented Housing in Europe”. Nunspeet (the Netherlands),8-9March1996.
    ④Hegedüs, J.&Teller, N. Development of the Housing Allowance Programmes in Hungary in the Context ofCEE Transitional Countries, European Journal of Housing Policy Vol.5, No.2,187~209, August2005
    ⑤Lux, M.: State and Local Government: How to Improve the Partnership in: M. Lux (edited): Housing Policy:an End or a New Beginning? LGI Books, Open Society Institute,2003
    ①“Hungary: Financial System Stability Assessment Update Including a Report on the Observance of Standardsand Codes on Insurance Regulation.” International Monetary Fund, June2005.
    ②Buckley, R. M., Lipman B., and Persaud, T..“Mortgage Design Under Inflation and Real Wage Uncertainty:The Use of Dual Indexed Instruments.” World Develop.21,2000
    ①Kiss, G. and G. Vadas. Monetary Transmission in the Hungarian Housing Market. MNB working paper.2004
    ②Harot, J.Recent Developments in European Mortgage Markets. Housing Finance International, December2000
    ①Rozsavolgyi, Reka,Viktoria Kovacs. Housing Subsidies in Hungary: Curse or Blessing?.ECFIN CountryFocus, Vol.2, Issue18,2005
    ①Rozsavolgyi, Reka and Viktoria Kovacs. Housing Subsidies in Hungary: Curse or Blessing? ECFIN CountryFocus, Vol.2, Issue18, October11,2005,1~6.
    ②Kiss, G. and G. Vadas. Monetary Transmission in the Hungarian Housing Market. MNB working paper.2005.
    ①Uchman, R.,Adamski, J. How to meet market rules and social goals for Housing? in:M. Lux (edited): HousingPolicy: an End or a New Beginning? LGI Books, Open Society Institute,2003.
    ①Clapham, D. Hegedüs, J. Kintrea, K&Tosics, I. with H. Kay (eds) Housing privatization in Eastern Europe.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,2006
    ①The macro-economic effects of changes in housing loan subsidies. Quarterly Report on Inflation, HungarianNational Bank,2004,86~88
    ②European Commission.Housing and the business cycle. Quarterly Report on the Euro Area, Vol.4, No.2,2005,30~40
    ①曹建海.向高房价宣战.北京:中信出版社,2010.100
    ②曹建海.向高房价宣战.北京:中信出版社,2010.102
    ①申亮.廉租房提供的财税政策国际比较及对我国的启示.地方财政研究,2007(3)
    ②杨阳,谢京华.我国城镇住房保障的财力保障机制研究.前沿,2009(6)
    ③建设部课题组.多层次住房保障体系研究.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.39
    ①曹建海.向高房价宣战.北京:中信出版社,2010.103~104
    [1]马克思恩格斯选集(第1~4卷).北京:人民出版社,1995
    [2]马克思恩格斯全集(第3卷).北京:人民出版社,1972
    [3]恩格斯.英国工人阶级状况.北京:人民出版社,1956
    [4]列宁选集(第1~4卷).北京:人民出版社,1995
    [5]毛泽东选集(第1~4卷).北京:人民出版社,1991
    [6]邓小平文选(第1~3卷).北京:人民出版社,1993
    [7]江泽民文选(第1~3卷).北京:人民出版社,2006
    [1]黄继峰.东欧新马克思主义.北京:中央编译出版社,2002
    [2]王瑜.东欧共产党:倒下的“多米诺骨牌”.北京:红旗出版社,2005
    [3]王义祥.中东欧经济转轨.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2003
    [4]高歌.东欧国家的政治转轨.北京:世界知识出版社,2003
    [5]赵乃斌,朱晓中.东欧经济大转轨.北京:中国经济出版社,1995
    [6]杨华主编.东欧剧变纪实.北京:世界知识出版社,1990
    [7]黄宏,古松主编.东欧剧变与执政党建设.北京:红旗出版社,1991
    [8]辛夷,樊佳主编.东欧剧变之后.北京:人民日报出版社,1992
    [9]蒋锐.东欧人民民主政权道路研究.山东:山东人民出版社,2002
    [10]中国社科院苏联与东欧问题研究所编译组编译.东欧问题资料,北京:东方出版社,1990
    [11]国务院发展研究中心欧亚社会发展研究所编.东欧中亚列国志.北京:当代世界出版社1994
    [12]薛君度主编.转轨中的中东欧.北京:人民出版社,2002
    [13]芮边.剧变后的东欧.北京:新华出版社,1991
    [14]王正泉主编.剧变后的原苏联东欧国家(1989——1999).北京:东方出版社,2001
    [15]陈学明.苏联东欧剧变后国外马克思主义趋向.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000
    [16]周新城主编.苏联东欧与中国:经济体制的比较研究.北京:求实出版社,1989
    [17]申战,樊汉祯,王之连.战后东欧与中国社会主义发展历程比较研究.北京:中央文献出版社,2002
    [18]高德平编著.列国志·波兰.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005
    [19]陈广嗣编著.列国志·捷克.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005
    [20]李丹琳编著.列国志·匈牙利.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006
    [21]冯俊.住房与住房政策.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009
    [22]孙学玉.当代中国民生问题研究.北京:人民出版社,2010
    [23]罗应光,向春玲等编著.住有所居——中国保障型住房建设的理论与实践.北京:中共中央党校出版社,2011
    [24]曹建海.向高房价宣战.北京:中信出版社,2010
    [25]吴立范,罗党论.中国的住房政策.北京:经济科学出版社,2009
    [26]郝益东.中国住房观察与国际比较.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009
    [27]余南平.欧洲社会模式——以欧洲之风和住房市场为视角.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2009
    [28]【俄】尤·阿·布拉诺夫著,张志强,赵志鹏译.被篡改的列宁遗嘱.北京:新华出版社,1999
    [29]【英】本·福凯斯著,张金鉴译.东欧共产主义的兴衰.北京:中央编译出版社,1998
    [1]樊勇.由波兰看东欧社会剧变后的贫富问题.俄罗斯中亚东欧研究,2004(2)
    [2]张陆伟.波兰地方政府融资发展过程及对我国的借鉴意义.中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2007(2)
    [3]代东凯.匈牙利住房市场发展中的政府干预.俄罗斯中亚东欧研究,2009(3)
    [4]张恩照.成立住房储蓄银行,发展住房储蓄业务.中国房地产金融,2003(2)
    [5]张贯一,易仁川.东欧国家住房体制的变迁.东欧中亚研究,1997(4)
    [6]乔木森.东欧中亚国家的住房制度改革.东欧中亚研究,1995(6)
    [7]徐姗姗.国内外住房补贴模式研究述评.理论与实践,2006(3)
    [8]王晓琴.捷克房地产业的改革与发展.中国房地产导报,1996(21)
    [9]杨其嘉.捷克政府怎样资助公民建房.住宅科技,1996(2)
    [10]于南平,陆志强.匈牙利的住房补贴制度及其借鉴.上海金融,2006(9)
    [11]胡彬.评析转轨经济国家的十年住房制度改革.世界经济,2001(1)
    [1] Regina Cowen Karp.(1993).Central and Eastern Europe: the challenge of transition.OxfordUniversity Press US
    [2] Paul N. Balchin.(1996).Housing policy in Europe.Routledge
    [3] Stuart Lowe,S. Tsenkova.(2003).Housing change in East and Central Europe: integrationor fragmentation.Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
    [4] John Sillince.(1990).Housing policies in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union.Routledge
    [5] David Clapham.(1996).Housing privatization in Eastern Europe.Greenwood PublishingGroup
    [6] OECD,OECD Publishing,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2007).OECD Economic Surveys: Hungary-Volume2007Issue10.OECD Publishing
    [7] Bates, M., Brzeski, W. J., Dale-Johnson, D..(1999). Property Valuation and Appraisal: U.S.
    [8] Information Systems and Recommendations for Poland. Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortiumfor USAID.
    [9] Blood, R.,.(1998). Prospective Role of Mortgage Insurance in Support of Housing Finance inPoland. Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [10] Stahl, K.(1991). Do Savings Programs Dedicated to Home Ownership Increase PersonalSavings? J. Public Econ.44,223~247.
    [11] Buckley, R. M., Lipman B., Persaud, T..(1993). Mortgage Design Under Inflation and RealWage Uncertainty: The Use of Dual Indexed Instruments. World Develop.21,455~464.
    [12] Business Monitor International, Emerging Europe Monitor (2001). London.
    [13] Chiquier, L.(1998). Dual Index Mortgages: Conditions of Sustainable Development.Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [14] Malpezzi, S., Vandell, K.(2002). Does the low-income housing tax credit increase thesupply of housing?. Journal of Housing Economics11:360~380.
    [15]. Sunega, P.(2005). The effectiveness of selected housing subsidies in the Czech Republic.Czech Sociological Review41:271-299.
    [16] Lowe S., Tsenkova S.(2003). Housing Change in East and Central Europe. Integration orFragmentation?.
    [17] Duncan, D.(1999). The Collection, Dissemination, and Importance of Mortgage MarketData. U.S. Mortgage Bankers Association for the Polish Banks Association.
    [18] Handorf, W.(1998). Development of a Regulatory Policy Framework for Real EstateLending: Review of United States Regulations and Lessons Learned for Poland. Warsaw:Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [19] Harot, J.(2000). Recent Developments in European Mortgage Markets. Housing FinanceInternational, December2000.
    [20] Hegedus, J., Mayo, S., Tosics, I.(1996). Regional Monograph: The Changing HousingSector in East-Central European Transition Countries. Budapest, Metropolitan ResearchInstitute for USAID, ECE, and UNCHS Habitat.
    [21] Hegedus, J., Mayo, S., Tosics, I.(1996). Transition of the Housing Sector in theEast-Central European Countries. Budapest: USAID.
    [22] Lea, M.(1999). International Banking and Real Estate Crises: Lessons for Poland. Warsaw:Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [23] Lea,M.(1999). GlobalModels for Funding Housing:What is the BestModel for Poland?.Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [24] Lee, M.(1999). USAID’s Assistance to Poland’s Housing Finance Sector:1991~1999.Warsaw: USAID.
    [25] Lea, M. J., Bernstein, S. A.(1995). International Housing Finance Sourcebook1995.Chicago: International Union of Housing Finance Institutions.
    [26] Lea,M. J., Bernstein, S. A.(1996). Housing Finance in an Inflationary Economy: TheExperience of Mexico. J. of Housing Econ.5,67~100.
    [27] Lea, M., Laszek, J., Chiquier, L.(1998). Analysis of Contract Savings for Housing Systemsin Poland. Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [28] Malpezzi, S., Mayo, S. K.(1997). Housing and Urban Development Indicators: A GoodIdea Whose Time Has Returned. Real Estate Econ.25,1~11.
    [29] Mayo, S. K., Angel, S., Heller, M., Stephens, W.(1992). The Housing Indicators Program:Extensive Survey Preliminary Results. World Bank, Urban Development Division.
    [30] Merrill, S., Kozlowski, E., Karas, P., Laszek, J.(2000). Poland: Housing Finance at theMillenium. Warsaw: Urban Institute Consartium for USAID.
    [31] Merrill, S.(2000). Home Purchase in the Visegrad Countries: The Case of Poland.
    [32] Merrill, S., Hendershott, P. Mayo, S., Lea, M., and Diamond, D.(1999). Housing and theMacroeconomy: Tax Reform and the Alternative Subsidy Policies for Housing. Warsaw:Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [33] Merrill, S.,Mayo, S., Grabowski,M., Sickles,M., Kozlowski, E., Karas, P., Koziarek,M.(1998). The Feasibility of Estimating the Demand for Residential Mortgage Credit in Poland.Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [34] Merrill, S. R., Lea, M., Diamond, D., Sickles-Grabowska, M., Aukward, K., Kozlowski, E.,Laszek,J., Lawrence, R.(2009). Public Sector Housing Finance Policy Strategies for Poland.Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [35] Merrill, S., Garnett, H., Lawrence, R., Urbanska, W., Kozlowski, E., and Laszek, J.(1998c).Local Government Rent Policy and Best Practice in Poland: The Need for Rent Reform andan Improved Housing Allowance Program. Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [36] Merrill, S., Lea, M., Chiquier, L., Brzeski, W. J., Rabenhorst, C., Mikelsons, M., McLennan,D.,Mayo, S., Turner, B., et al.(2010). Building on Progress: The Future of Housing Financein Poland.”Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [37] Rabenhorst, C., Follack, P., Laszek, J., and Stawecki, T.(1998). Analysis andRecommendations for Revision of Statutory Lien Policy in Poland. Warsaw: Urban InstituteConsortium for USAID.
    [38] Scholten,U.(2000). Rotating Savings and CreditAssociations inDeveloped Countries:TheGerman–Austrian Bausparkassen. J. Comp. Econ.28,324~353.
    [39] Struyk, R.(Ed.)(1996). Economic Restructuring of the Former Soviet Bloc: The Case ofHousing. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
    [40] Thomson Financial BankWatch.(1999). Central Europe’s Largest Banks. Central Europ.Econ.Rev. Wall Street J. Europe,22.
    [41] Freeman, A., Chaplin, R.,Whitehead, Ch.(1997). Rental Affordability: A Review ofInternational Literature. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
    [42] Home Ownership and Housing Finance Policy in the Former Soviet Bloc: Costly Populism.(2000)Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
    [43] Barek, R..(2006).Examples of social standards of the social housing, Zeszyty NaukowePolitechniki Poznanskiej-Architektura Urbanistyka7/2006, Poznan
    [44] Bramley, G..(1991). Bridging the Affordability Gap in1990. The Association of DistrictCouncils.
    [45] Bramley, G..(1994). An Affordability Crisis in British Housing: Dimensions, Causes andPolicy Impact, Housing Studies9:73~104.
    [46] Ceny sledovanych druh nemovitostí.(2005). Praha: esky statisticky ú ad. Sú, P íjmy,vydání a spot eba domácností podle statistiky rodinnych ú t za rok2000,2001,2002,2003,2004. Sú (http://www.czso.cz/csu/edicniplan.nsf/p/3001-05)
    [47] Donner, Ch.(2006). Housing Policies in Central Eastern Europe. Vienna: Christian Donner.
    [48] Garnett, D.(2000). Housing Finance. London: The Chartered Institute of Housing.
    [49] Hallet, G.(ed.)(1993). The New Housing Shortage: Housing Affordability in Europe andthe USA. London: Routledge.
    [50] Hancock, K.E.(1993). Can Pay? Won′t Pay?, Urban Studies30:127-145.
    [51] Hills, J. et al.(1990). Shifting Subsidy from Bricks and Mortar to People: Experiences inBritain and West Germany, Housing Studies5
    [52] Hui, C. M. E.(2001). Measuring Affordability in Public Housing from Economic Principles:Case Study of Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Planning and Development Vol.127, No.1, Str.34~49.
    [53] Hulchanski, D.(1995). The Concept of Housing Affordability: Six Contemporary Uses ofthe Housing Expenditure-To-Income Ratio, Housing Studies10:465~475.
    [54] Rabenhorst, C., Follack, P., Laszek, J., and Stawecki, T.(1998).“Analysis andRecommendations for Revision of Statutory Lien Policy in Poland.” Warsaw: Urban InstituteConsortium for USAID.
    [55] Kaufman T.L.(1997). Out of reach: the unaffordability of rental housing, Journal ofHousing and Community Development.
    [56] Linneman, P.,Melbolugbe, I.(1992). Housing Affordability: Myth or Reality?, UrbanStudies29:369~392.
    [57] Maclennan, D., Williams, R.(1990). Affordable Housing in Europe. York: Joseph RowntreeFoundation.
    [58] Mulroy, E.A., Ewalt, P.L.(1996). Affordable housing: a basic need and a social issue, SocialWork.
    [59] Stone, M.E.(1990). One third of a Nation. Washington: Economic Policy Institute.
    [60] Maclennan, D., Stephens, M. and Kemp., P.(1997). Housing Policy in the EU MemberStates. European Parliament Directorate General for Research, Social Affairs Series. WorkingDocument14. Luxembourg.
    [61] Thalmann, P.(1999). Identifying households which need housing assistance, Urban Studies36.
    [62] Whitehead, Ch.(1991). From Need to Affordability: An Analysis of UK Housing Objectives,Urban Studies28:871-887.
    [63] Blood, R.,(1998).“Prospective Role of Mortgage Insurance in Support of Housing Financein Poland.” Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [64] Bo¨rsch-Supan, A., and Stahl, K.(1991).“Do Savings Programs Dedicated to HomeOwnership Increase Personal Savings?” J. Public Econ.44,265–297.
    [65] Buckley, R. M., Lipman B., and Persaud, T.(1993).“Mortgage Design Under Inflation andReal Wage Uncertainty: The Use of Dual Indexed Instruments.” World Develop.21.
    [66] Boelhouwer, P., Heijden, H.(1992). Housing Systems in Europe. Part I. Delft: DelftUniversity Press.
    [67] Chiquier, L.(1998).“Dual Index Mortgages: Conditions of Sustainable CSO (1997):Statistical Yearbook of Hungary1996, Budapest: Hungarian Central Statistical Office.
    [68] Dániel, Z.(1993):“Is Rental Housing Necessary? Hungarian Problems in the Light ofExperience Abroad”, in: Acta Oeconomica, Vol.45No.1-2, pp.101-116.
    [69] Merrill, S. R., Lea, M., Diamond, D., Sickles-Grabowska, M., Aukward, K., Kozlowski, E.,Laszek, J., and Lawrence, R.(1998b).“Public Sector Housing Finance Policy Strategies forPoland.” Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium for USAID.
    [70] Merrill, S., Garnett, H., Lawrence, R., Urbanska, W., Kozlowski, E., and Laszek, J.(1998c).“Local Government Rent Policy and Best Practice in Poland: The Need for Rent Reform andan Improved Housing Allowance Program.” Warsaw: Urban Institute Consortium forUSAID.
    [71] Struyk, R.(Ed.)(1996). Economic Restructuring of the Former Soviet Bloc: The Case ofHousing.Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
    [72]Wisniewska, M.(1999).“Pekao’s Big Push.” Central Europ. Econ. Rev. Wall Street J.Europe,14.
    [73] Oxley, M.(1996). Housing Investment and Social Housing: a European Comparison. Paperat the ENHRCECODHAS Workshop “Changing Social Rented Housing in Europe”.
    [74] Ball, Michael.(2005).RICS European Housing Review2005.Royal Institute of CharteredSurveyors.
    [75] Housing Statistics in the European Union2004.(2005).National Board of Housing,Building and Planning. Sweden.
    [76] Hungary: Financial System Stability Assessment Update Including a Report on theObservance of Standards and Codes on Insurance Regulation.(2005).International MonetaryFund.
    [77] Ingatlan Real Estate Database.(2005).Online.www.ingatlan.com/statisztika_int.php?lang=en. Accessed November22.
    [78].Markharn, Maureen.(2003). Poland: Housing Challenge in a Time of Transition. Online.www.jchs.harvard.edu/education/oustanding_student_papers/markham_poland_03.pdf.Accessed June7,2006.
    [79] Remarks from the Eastern European Workshop on Housing Finance and HousingAffordability.(2004). Budapest, Hungary.
    [80] Report from the Commission on Hungary.(2004).Commission of the EuropeanCommunities.
    [81] Rozsavolgyi, Reka. Viktoria Kovacs.(2005).Housing Subsidies in Hungary: Curse orBlessing? ECFIN Country Focus, Vol.2, Issue18.
    [82] Sykora, Ludek.(1996).Housing System, Housing Policy and Housebuilding; In The CzechRepublic and Prague.Housing Policy in Europe. P. Balchin, ed. London: Routledge,.
    [83] Szechenyi Plan: Pillars of the Future.(2001).Hungarian Ministry of Economic Affairs,
    [84] Szilagyi, Katalin.(2002). Housing Finance in Hungary, in Housing Finance in TransitionEconomies. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
    [85] Thousands Celebrate as EU Nears Historic Expansion.(2006).Breaking News.ie. Online.www.archives.tcm.ie/breakingnews/2004/04/30/story145315.asp. Accessed April2,2006.
    [86] Erzsebet,Gergely Kiss(.2002).Housing Finance in Hungary.”Paper presented at the OECDWorkshop on Housing Finance.
    [87] Yearbook of Housing Statistics.(2001~2010).Hungarian Central Statistics Office,

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700