蚕蛹在黄鳝饲料中替代鱼粉的应用研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
为评价蚕蛹原料在黄鳝饲料中的应用价值,设计了蚕蛹与鱼粉常规营养和氨基酸含量的比较研究、黄鳝对蚕蛹离体消化率测定、蚕蛹替代鱼粉对黄鳝各组织消化酶活性及黄鳝肉营养品质的影响等4个试验。
     1.从常规营养成分、氨基酸含量和氨基酸平衡3个方面比较蚕蛹和鱼粉的营养价值。结果表明:蚕蛹干物质含量为91.32%,是鱼粉的1.06倍;以干物质计的粗蛋白、粗脂肪、粗灰分含量为60.58%、27.6%、4.75%,分别是鱼粉的0.86倍、2.19倍和0.28倍;蚕蛹和鱼粉都分别检出18种氨基酸,其总氨基酸含量为49.59%和59.07%;10种必需氨基酸含量分别为24.70%和25.71%,其中蚕蛹中胱氨酸、缬氨酸、异亮氨酸、酪氨酸和色氨酸含量高于鱼粉,蚕蛹10种必需氨基酸含量是鱼粉的96.07%;必需氨基酸占总氨基酸的比例(EAA/TAA)分别为49.81%和43.53%;必需氨基酸与非必需氨基酸的比例(EAA/NEAA)分别为99.27︰100和77.09︰100;蚕蛹必需氨基酸平衡性稍优于鱼粉;研究认为,蚕蛹是一种高蛋白高能量饲料原料,可作为替代鱼粉的一种蛋白原料,同时替代鱼粉配制日粮时应注意补充赖氨酸和矿物质尤其是钙、磷,保证日粮营养的平衡性。
     2.采用消化道粗酶提取和体外孵育消化的方法,测定了黄鳝和泥鳅对蚕蛹的离体消化率,并以鱼粉为对照,评价2种鱼对蚕蛹的消化利用能力。结果表明:黄鳝对蚕蛹和鱼粉均具有较高的消化率,其中黄鳝对蚕蛹中干物质和粗脂肪的消化率均显著低于鱼粉(P<0.05),对粗蛋白质的消化率极显著高于鱼粉(P<0.01),这使在开发黄鳝人工饲料时用蚕蛹部分或全部替代鱼粉成为可能;泥鳅对蚕蛹和鱼粉均具有一定的的消化率,但各种营养成分的消化率均显著低于鱼粉(P<0.05),所以蚕蛹在泥鳅饲料中不是理想的蛋白源饲料;黄鳝和泥鳅肝胰脏分泌的消化液中的主要消化酶,对各种营养物质的消化发挥着十分重要的作用,其对消化率的影响作用最大。
     3.采样灌喂添加不同比例蚕蛹的配合饲料的方法,研究蚕蛹对黄鳝胃、前肠、后肠和肝胰脏消化酶活性的影响,包括时间梯度试验和浓度梯度试验2部分。结果表明:蚕蛹对黄鳝各组织蛋白酶活性的影响较大,随蚕蛹添加量的上升,肝胰脏、胃、前肠中蛋白酶活性有升高的趋势,后肠蛋白酶活性有降低的趋势;随时间的延长,各组织的蛋白酶活性有先下降再上升的趋势,后肠蛋白酶活性在灌喂后6h达到峰值,而前肠和胃的峰值分别在1h和6h;与鱼粉比较,蚕蛹组胃、前肠内蛋白酶活性在3h以前低于鱼粉组,6h时高于鱼粉组,表明黄鳝胃对鱼粉蛋白质的消化作用较大,前肠对蚕蛹蛋白质的消化作用较大,这可能与蚕蛹蛋白质的组成与结构有关。蚕蛹对黄鳝各组织脂肪酶和淀粉酶影响较小,无明显的变化规律。
     4.以蚕蛹为蛋白源等氮替代15%和30%的鱼粉,对平均体重25g的黄鳝,进行4W的饲养试验,并与商品饲料饲喂的网箱养殖黄鳝和野生黄鳝血清生化指标、肌肉品质进行比较,结果表明:随着蚕蛹在饲料中含量的增加,黄鳝生长无显著差异;血清总蛋白、血糖和谷草转氨酶活性显著下降,甘油三酯呈升高趋势;肌肉脂肪含量显著升高,蛋白含量随之下降;试验、网箱和野生黄鳝肌肉中都分别检出17种氨基酸,总氨基酸含量分别为69.70%、66.85%和67.76%,7种必需氨基酸含量分别为42.28%,41.82%和42.54%,鲜味氨基酸含量分别为27.90%,26.42%和26.00%,以FAO模式和鸡蛋蛋白模式对3组黄鳝肌肉必需氨基酸含量进行评定,认为网箱组的必需氨基酸比例最平衡;黄鳝肌肉中检出脂肪酸22种,饱和脂肪酸9种,不饱和脂肪酸13种,高不饱和脂肪酸7种,以网箱组的DHA含量3.97%最高。研究认为,黄鳝饲料中蚕蛹的添加量应控制在30%以下。
Four experiments were conducted to evaluate the possibility of silkworm chrysalis (SC) as one kind of feedstuff for Monopterus ablbus commercial feed. In experiment one, level of nutritional ingredients was compared between SC and fish meal (FM). In experiment two, digestibility of SC for Monopterus ablbus was determined in vitro. Influence of dietary SC on digestive enzyme activities, growth performance and flesh quality were studied in experiment three and four respectively.
     1. Level of nutritional ingredients and amino acids pattern were compared between SC and FM. The results showed that the content of dry matter in SC was 91.32%, 1.06 times as that in FM; Contents of crude protein, crude fat, crude ash were 60.58%, 27.6% and 4.75% in SC (0.86 times, 2.19 times and 0.28 times as those in FM) respectively; A total of 18 kinds of amino acids were determined in both SC and FM. Contents of the total amino acid (TAA) were 49.59% and 59.07% and contents of 10 kinds of essential amino acids (EAA) were 25.71% and 24.70% in SC and FM, respectively. The contents of some amino acids, such as Cys, Val, Ile, Tyr and Trp, were higher in SC than those in FM. EAA/TAA was 49.81% and 43.53%, EAA/NEAA were 99.27% and 77.09 in SC and FM. The balance of amino acid in SC was better than that in FM.
     2. In vitro digestive ratio of SC by Monopterus ablbus and Misgurnus anguillicaudatus were determined, with FM as the control. The results showed that digestibility of dry matter and crude fat of SC were lower than those of FM. Protein digestibility of SC by Misgurnus anguillicaudatus was significantly lower than that of FM (P<0.05), crud protein digestibility of SC by Misgurnus anguillicaudatus was similar with that of dry matter and crude fat, while Monopterus ablbus had higher digestibility of SC than that of FM (P<0.01). On the other hand, the utilization rate of SC was higher in Monopterus ablbus than that in Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. These results indicated that SC could be used to replace FM partly or totally in Monopterus ablbus feed and with certain limitation in Misgurnus anguillicaudatus feed.
     3. Digestive enzyme activities in stomach, foregut, hindgut and hepatopancreas of Monopterus ablbus fed different contents of SC were tested. The results showed that protease activities of stomach, foregut and hepatopancreas increased with the increase of SC content in feed. Protease activities of hindgut achieved a peak in 6h after feeding (at 1h and 6h of foregut and stomach, respectively); protease activities of foregut and stomach in SC treatment was lower than that in FM treatment at 3h after feeding, but higher at 6h. Protease activities were higher in stomach and lower in foregut of FM treatment compared with the SC treatment. The difference might be due to the protein profile of SC. The SC had little influence on the activities of lipase and amylase.
     4. Rice Field Eel with the average weight of 25g were fed for 4 weeks, by using SC as a kind of protein source at the level of 15% and 30%. The biological parameters of serum and flesh quality index were compared among different groups. The results showed that the growth performance in SC groups were not significant different; contents of serum TP, Glu and GOT decreased with the increase of SC content, but TG was in a opposite manner; lipid content of muscle significantly increased but protein content decreased. A total of 17 kinds of amino acids were determined in SC group, cage group and wild group; TAA contents were 69.70%、66.85% and 67.76%; contents of 7 kinds of EAA were 42.28%,41.82% and 42.54%; fresh amino acid were 27.90%,26.42% and 26.00%, respectively. The balance of amino acid of cage group was the best. A total of 22 kinds of fatty acids were determined in muscle, in which 9 kinds of saturated fatty acids, 13 kinds of unsaturated fatty acid, 7 kinds of highly unsaturated fatty acid were found; DHA content was the highest (3.97%) in cage group. It is suggested that the content of SC in Monopterus ablbus feed should be kept lower than 30%.
引文
[1]夏未铭.我国蚕蛹综合开发现状和前景[J].中国蚕业,2003,24(1):12~14.
    [2]熊燕飞,陈怀新.蚕蛹的综合利用[J].天然产物研究与开发,1999,11(1):82~85.
    [3]任绍光.蚕蛹综合利用研究[J].适用技术市场,1997,(10) 23~24.
    [4]钱俊青.蚕蛹的化学成分及其利用[J].食品工业,1997,5: 42~43.
    [5]张燕,陈业高.蚕蛹氨基酸成分及营养价值[J].云南化工.2002,12(6):22~25
    [6]张锐.桑蚕副产物综合利用现状及发展前景[J].新疆农业科学,1999,1: 36~39.
    [7]魏克民,浦锦宝,祝永强,等.近年来蚕副产品在中医药领域应用研究的经验[J].中国中医药科技,2004,9(11):298~299
    [8]李爱玲.氨基酸对心血管功能的影响[J].氨基酸与生物资源,1998,20(2):45~49.
    [9]张迎庆.冷冻结晶法提取蚕蛹油不饱和脂肪酸[J].湖北工学院学报,2000,15(1).
    [10]干信.蚕蛹制取D-氨基葡萄糖盐酸盐的工艺监测[J].适用技术市场,1997,(12):26~27.
    [11]胡志鹏.甲壳糖的研究进展[J].中国生化药物杂志,2003,24(4):210~212
    [12]周先前,窦爱丽.豆粕和蚕蛹替代部分鱼粉对PIC商品猪生长性能的研讨[J].饲料资源,2007(7):34~35.
    [13]邱怀文,张静,李俊文.长毛兔养殖饲料配方及注意事项[J].畜禽养殖,2006(11):38.
    [14]裴素俭,蚕蛹的综合利用,特种经济动植物,2001,(5)
    [15]周丰岑,范朝军,马中群,等.用蚕蛹替代鱼粉饲喂蛋鸡试验.[J].郑州牧专学报,996.16(1):23~25
    [16]郑庆委,康冀川.蚕蛹虫草人工培育及药理作用的研究进展[J].贵州大学学报(自然科学版),2006,()01
    [17]Nobuyasu maki,Okitsugu yamashita.Purification and Characterization of a protease Degrading 30 ku Yolk Proteins of the Silkworm,Bombyx moxi.Insect Biochem[J].Molec.1997,27:721~728
    [18]Hajime Mori,Masuhiro Tsukada,New silk protein: modification of silk protein by gene engineering for production of biomaterials[J],Review in Molecular Biotechnology,2000(74):95~103
    [19]Kuihiro shiomi,Yukihiro sato,kunio imai,Okitsugu Yamashita.A Hydrophpbic peptide(VAP-peptide)of the silkworm,bombyx mori:structure,expression and an evhancing function of diapause hormone activity[J].Insect Biochem,1998,28(2):75~82
    [20]Seiichi Hara,Minoru Yamakawa.Production in Escherichia coli of moricin,a novel type antibacterial peptide from the silkworm,bombyx mori:structure,expression and an enhancing function of diapause hormore activity[J].Insect Biochem,1998,28(2):75~82
    [21]Rangacharyulu P V,Giri S S,Paul B N,et al.Utilization of fermented silkworm pupae silage in feed for carp[J].Bioresource Technology,2003,86:29~32
    [22]黄鳝养殖现状和市场前景[J].广州农村实用技术,2006(9)
    [23]邴旭文.模仿自然繁殖条件下的黄鳝人工繁殖试验[J].水产学报,2005(29)2:285~288
    [24]尹邵武,周工健,刘筠.黄鳝的繁殖生态学研究[J].生态学报,2005(25)3:435~439
    [25]张燕萍,谢宪兵,周秋白.维生素E、维生素C、HUFA和二氢吡啶交互作用对黄鳝繁殖性能的影响[J].养殖与饲料,2007(10):49~54
    [26]周文宗,张硌,高红莉,等.黄鳝浅水无土半人工繁殖研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2007,29 (1):105~108
    [27]Arai S,Nose T,Hashimoto Y.Amino acids essential for the growth of eels.Anguilla anguilla and Anguilla japonica.Bull Jpn Soc Sci fish,1972,38(7):753~759
    [28]黄凯,月醴饲料蛋白质需要量的研究[J].中国饲料,1999,23:8~10
    [29]赵兴文,毕宁阳,刘焕亮.真鲷对蛋白质和必需氨基酸需要量的研究[J].大连水产学院学报,1995,(10)4:14~18
    [30]Halver,J .E,Fish Nutrition.Academic Press,1972,1~99
    [31]杨代勤,陈芳,李道霞,等.黄鳝食性的初步研究[J].水产学报,1997,21(1):24~30
    [32]陈芳,杨代勤,李道霞,等.黄鳝饲料中蚯蚓含量对其摄食的影响[J].饲料研究,1998.10:30
    [33]杨代勤,严安生,陈芳,等.不同饲料对黄鳝消化酶活性的影响[J].水产学报,2003. 27(6):558~563
    [34]陈芳,杨代勤,阮国良,等.黄鳝配合饲料的研究及饲养试验[J].水利渔业,2005.25(5):77~78
    [35]杨代勤,陈芳,阮国良.饲料中添加胆碱对黄鳝生长、组织脂肪含量及消化酶活性的影响[J].水产学报2006.30(5):677~682
    [36]杨代勤,陈芳,黄鳝主要营养素需要量及饲料最适能量蛋白比[J].水产学报,2000,(4):259~262
    [37]Wang Yan, Li Kai, Ha Huan, Potential of using a blend of rendered animal protein ingredients to replace fish meal in practical diets for malabar grouper (Epinephelus malabricus)[J],Aquicultrue,2008(281),113~117
    [38]王广军,吴锐全,谢骏,等.军曹鱼饲料中用豆粕替代鱼粉的研究[J]大连水产学院学报,2005(20)4,305~307
    [39]解绥启,Alfred Jokumsen,等.饲料中土豆蛋白替代鱼粉对虹鳟摄食率、消化率和生长的影响[J].1999(23)2,128~133
    [40]解绥启,Alfred Jokumsen,等.饲料中土豆蛋白替代鱼粉对虹鳟摄食率、消化率和生长的影响[J].1999(23)2,128~133
    [41]曹志华,罗静波,文华,等.肉骨粉、豆粕替代鱼粉水平对黄鳝生长的影响[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2007.4(1):28~30
    [42]朱爱意,褚学林.大黄鱼(Pseudosciaena crocea)消化道不同部位两种消化酶的活力分布及其受温度、pH的影响[J].海洋与湖沼,2006,37(6)561~567.
    [43]叶元土,林仕海,罗莉.温度,PH值对南方大口鲶、长吻鮠蛋白酶和淀粉酶活力的影响,[J].大连水产学院学报,1998,13(2):17~23.
    [44]倪寿文,远明,刘焕亮.草鱼、鲤、鲢、鳙和尼罗罗非鱼淀粉酶活性的研究比较[J].大连水产学院学报,1992,7(1):24~31
    [45]林建斌,李金秋,王剑锋,等.不同能量蛋白质比饲料对石斑鱼幼鱼体内消化酶活性影响[J].中国饲料,2008,14,33~35
    [46]乔慧,黄成,王喆,等.不同饲料对黄颡鱼消化酶活性的影响[J].淡水渔业,2007(37)1,58~61
    [47]董云伟,牛翠娟.豆粕替代鱼粉对罗氏沼虾生长和消化酶活性的影响[J].北京师范大学学报,2000(36)2,260~263
    [48]吴婷婷,朱晓鸣.镢鱼、青鱼、草鱼、鲤、鲫、鲢消化酶活性的研究[J].中国水产科学,1994,1(2):10~16
    [49]戴贤君,舒妙安.黄鳝不同生长阶段消化器官及其消化酶的变化[J].上海交通大学学报(自然科学版),2002(20)2,113~116
    [50]L I Er-chao ,CHEN Li-qiao,CAI Yong-jiu. Effects of Soy Protein Concentrate as a Dietary Protein Source on Digestive Enzyme Activities of Eriochei r sinensis, Journal of Zhanjiang Ocean University,2006(26)4,15~21
    [51]钱曦,王桂芹,周洪琪.饲料蛋白水平及豆粕替代鱼粉比例对翘嘴红鲌消化酶活性的影响[J].动物营养学报,2007(2)19,182~187
    [52]何京.我国黄鳝的养殖现状及今后发展方向[J].渔业致富指南,2006,(3):9~10.
    [53]陈芳,杨代勤,阮国良,等.黄鳝配合饲料的研制及饲养试验[J].水利渔业:2005,(5):77~78.
    [54]周日东.黄鳝适口饲料配制及驯化投喂初步研究[J].科技推广,2006,(1):11~12.
    [55]杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京∶北京农业大学出版社,1994,19~23.
    [56]S.K. Tonheim ,A. Nordgreen ,I. Hogoy ,and so on . I. Ronnestad. In vitro digestibility of water-soluble and water-insoluble proteinfractions of some common fish larval feeds and feed ingredients. Aquaculture .2007,262 :426~435.
    [57]曾端,叶元土.鱼类食性与消化道系统结构的研究[J].西南农业大学学报,1998,20(4):362~364.
    [58]向枭,叶元土,周兴华,等.大鳍鳠的消化能力与营养价值[J].水产学报,2003,8 (4):371~376.
    [59]罗莉,林仕梅,叶元土,等.长吻鮠、南方大口鲶和鲤鱼对九种蛋白质饲料的体外消化率的测定[J].饲料研究,1997,(1):1~2.
    [60]王友慧,叶金云,陈建明,等.翘嘴红鲌消化道特征及体外消化率的研究[J].饲料博览,2005,(2):3~7.
    [61]朱爱意,褚学林.大黄鱼(Pseudosciaena crocea)消化道不同部位两种消化酶的活力分布及其受温度、pH的影响[J].海洋与湖沼,2006,37(6):561~567.
    [62]吴婷婷,镢鱼、青鱼、草鱼、鲤、鲫、鲢消化酶活性的研究[J].中国水产科学,1994,1(2):10~16.
    [63]Chunfang Wang , Shouqi Xie , Xiaoming Zhu, Effects of age and dietary rotein level on digestive enzyme activity and gene expression of Pelteobagrus fulvidraco larvae [J] . Aquaculture,2006,254,554~562.
    [64]Y.P. Kotzamanis , E. Gisbert , F.J. Gatesoupe, Effects of different dietary levels of fish protein hydrolysates on growth,digestive enzymes, gut microbiota, and resistance to Vibrio anguillarum in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae [J] . Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A 147 (2007) 205~214
    [65]E.Santigosa, J.Sánchez, F.Médale, Modifications of digestive enzymes in trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and sea bream(Sparus aurata) in response to dietary fish meal replacement by plant protein sources [J].Aquaculture , 2008,282: 68~74.
    [66]《生化技术导论》,人民教育出版社,中山大学生物系生化微生物学教研室编,1981年9月第2次印刷.
    [67]戴贤君,舒妙安.黄鳝不同生长阶段消化器官及消化酶的变化[J].上海交通大学学报,2002.20(2):113~116.
    [68]叶元土,林仕海,罗莉,温度,PH值对南方大口鲶、长吻鮠蛋白酶和淀粉酶活力的影响[J].大连水产学院学报,1998,13(2):17~23.
    [69]杨代勤,黄鳝食性的初步研究[J].水生生物学报,1997,21(1):24~30.
    [70]刘丹丹,吉红,范宇友,等,黄鳝和泥鳅对蚕蛹离体消化率的影响研究[J].湖北农业科学,2009,1 (48):153~155.
    [71]曾端,叶元土.黄鳝蛋白酶和淀粉酶活力的研究[J].北京水产,1999(3):30.
    [72]乔秀婷,张美婷,宋学军,等.鲤鱼肝胰脏、脾脏蛋白酶活性研究[J].1999,9(4):14~17.
    [73]倪寿文,远明,刘焕亮,草鱼、鲤、鲢、鳙和尼罗罗非鱼淀粉酶活性的研究比较[J].大连水产学院学报,1992,7(1):24~31.
    [74]何德硕,隋志刚,等.柞蚕蛹粉替代配合饲料中鱼粉的研究[J].中国饲料, 1995,15:32~34.
    [75]孙桂芝,韩桂芝.蚕蛹粉代替70%进口鱼粉饲喂北京肉鸭试验[J].辽宁畜牧兽医,1997,5:20
    [76]P.V. Rangacharyulu, S.S. Giri, B.N. Paul, K.P. Yashoda,R. Jagannatha Rao, N.S. Mahendrakar b, S.N. Mohanty,P.K. Mukhopadhyay. Utilization of fermented silkworm pupae silage in feed for carps. Bioresource Technology 86 (2003) 29–32.
    [77]杨代勤,陈芳,李道霞.黄鳝的营养素需要及饲料最适能量蛋白比[J ].水产学报,2000,24 (3):259~262.
    [78]曹志华,罗静波,文华,等.肉骨粉、豆粕替代鱼粉水平对黄鳝生长的影响[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2007.4(1):28~30.
    [79]Pellet P L,Yong V R. Nutritional evaluation of protein foods[M ].Tokyo:The United National University Publishing Company.1980,26~29.
    [80]桥本芳郎(蔡完其译).养鱼饲料学.北京:中国农业出版社,1980,113~115.
    [81]温小波,李伟国,周永平.野生乌鳢、鲶、黄颡鱼和黄鳝的脂类及脂肪酸组成比较[J].湖北农业科学,2003,(23):169~173.
    [82]舒妙安,马有智,张建成.黄鳝肌肉营养成分的分析[J].水产学报,2000,(24)8,339~344.
    [83]张昌颖,李亮,李昌甫,等.生物化学[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1988:305~561
    [84]马爱军,陈四清,雷霁霖,等.大菱鲆鱼体生化组织及营养价值的初步探讨[J.海洋水产研究,2003,24(1):11~14.
    [85]李正忠.花粉、灵芝与珍珠中必需氨基酸的定量测定与分析比较[J].氨基酸分析,1988,(4):41~43.
    [86]郡司笃孝.食品添加剂手册[M].刘纯洁,张娟婷,译.北京:中国展望出版社,1988:157~160.
    [87]殷帅文,林学群,陈洁辉.谈谈鱼类的比肝重及其意义[J].科学养鱼,2002,(9).
    [88]叶元土.水产动物营养与饲料研究评价指标体系[J].饲料广角,2004,(20):19~21.
    [89]马利.不同菜粕水平对草鱼生长、血液学指标和毒素残留的影响[C].华中农业大学2004届硕士学位论文,2004,12~33.
    [90]骆作勇,王雷,王宝杰,等.不同投喂模式对奥利亚罗非鱼血液生化指标与生长性能的影响[J].中国水产科学,2007,14(5):743-748.
    [91]温安详,周定刚.几种不同食性鱼类部分血液生化指标的比较研究[J].四川动物,2005(24)4:518~522.
    [92]林浩然.鱼类生理学[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,1999,36.
    [93]林利民,王秋荣,王志勇,等.不同家系大黄鱼肌肉营养成分的比较[J ].中国水产科学,2006,13 (2) :286~291.
    [94]]彭志东.饲料中不同水平的蛋白质和脂肪对红笛鲷幼鱼生长和肌肉成分的影响[J].中国饲料,2007,9:39~42.
    [95]Gaylord T G,Gatlin D M III.Dietary lipid level but not L-carnitine affects growth performance of hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops♀×M.saxatilis♂)[J].Aquaculture, 2000,190: 237~246.
    [96]闻芝梅,陈君石(主译).现代营养学(第七版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.57~63.
    [97]中国预防医学科学院营养与食品卫生研究所编著.食物成分表(全国代表值) [M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1991,30~82,92~104.
    [98]尹洪滨,孙中武,孙大江,等.6种养殖鲟鳇鱼肌肉营养成分的比较分析[J].大连水产学院学报,2004,19 (2):92~96.
    [99]宋超,庄平,章龙珍,等.野生及人工养殖中华鲟幼鱼肌肉营养成分的比较[J].动物学报,2007,53 (3) :502~510.
    [100]陈芳,杨代勤,方长琰.摄食不同饲料的黄鳝肌肉营养成分比较研究[J].水利渔业,2004(24)4:21~22.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700