异氟烷在脊髓水平的镇痛作用及其相关机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在科学技术迅猛发展的今天,一种不同于睡眠状态,没有意识,没有记忆,没有本能反映,没有疼痛,可逆性的麻醉状态之谜仍然悬而未解。全麻作用包括镇痛、镇静、肌松和无应激反应四大要素,以往针对全麻机理的研究结果基本上都是反应吸入麻醉四大要素的综合作用,这四者之间既相对独立、又存在复杂的内在联系,其对应的中枢作用区域和神经生理机制也存在较大的差异。多年的采用传统吸入给药方法的研究证明,吸入麻醉多种药理学效应不加区分综合研究的结果是很难取得突破性进展。
     研究目的:
     本研究率先采用鞘内给药技术,使异氟烷直接作用于脊髓,同时综合应用痛行为学、免疫组织化学、RT-PCR等研究方法,从脊髓水平直接探索:①异氟烷原液和乳化异氟烷在脊髓水平能否产生镇痛作用?②异氟烷原液和乳化异氟烷对脊髓Fos蛋白和c-fos mRNA表达的影响如何?研究结果为揭示吸入麻醉药在脊髓水平的镇痛作用及机制提供直接的理论依据。
     研究方法:
     第一部分:异氟烷原液鞘内给药的镇痛作用研究成年雄性大鼠随机分为6组,每组6只,随机均分为:A组:鞘内给予生理盐水50μl/kg;B组:鞘内给予异氟烷50μl/kg;C组:鞘内给予异氟烷25μl/kg;D组:鞘内给予生理盐水50μl/kg;E组:鞘内给予异氟烷50μl/kg;F组:鞘内给予异氟烷25μl/kg。A、B和C三组进行福尔马林实验和免疫组化实验,D、E和F三组进行Von Frey实验、Hargreaves实验和实时定量PCR实验。
     第二部分:乳化异氟烷鞘内给药的镇痛作用机制研究成年雄性大鼠随机分为6组,每组6只,随机均分为:A组:鞘内给予生理盐水50μl/kg;B组:鞘内给予乳化异氟烷50μl/kg;C组:鞘内给予乳化异氟烷25μl/kg;D组:鞘内给予生理盐水50μl/kg;E组:鞘内给予乳化异氟烷50μl/kg;F组:鞘内给予乳化异氟烷25μl/kg。A、B和C三组进行福尔马林实验和免疫组化实验,D、E和F三组进行Von Frey实验、Hargreaves实验和实时定量PCR实验。
     研究结果:
     1.异氟烷原液和乳化异氟烷在脊髓水平镇痛作用应用鞘内注射异氟烷原液和乳化异氟烷和痛行为学相结合方法研究结果表明:①给予不同剂量异氟烷原液(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)和乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)均能够明显抑制福尔马林诱发的抬足反射;②给予不同剂量异氟烷原液(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)和乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)均能够显著延长热刺激的反应潜伏期;③给予不同剂量异氟烷原液(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)和乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)均能够有效提高机械刺激的反应阈值。
     2.异氟烷原液和乳化异氟烷对脊髓Fos蛋白和c-fos mRNA表达的影响应用鞘内注射异氟烷原液和乳化异氟烷、免疫组织化学和RT-PCR相结合技术研究结果表明:①鞘内给予不同剂量异氟烷原液(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)和乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)均能够明显抑制Fos蛋白在脊髓的表达;②大鼠脊髓腰膨大段处,鞘内给予不同剂量的生理盐水(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)、异氟烷原液(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)和乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg和25μl/kg)。结果显示:异氟烷原液和乳化异氟烷各组的c-fos mRNA表达明显低于生理盐水对应组。
     3.异氟烷原液和乳化异氟烷在脊髓水平镇痛作用比较①异氟烷原液(50μl/kg)组对福尔马林诱发的大鼠抬足反射的抑制在5min、15min和25~35min强于乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg)组,而在55~60min则弱于乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg)组;②异氟烷原液(50μl/kg)组在10~15min热反射潜伏期明显长于乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg)组,而在25min热反射潜伏期明显短于乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg)组;③异氟烷原液(50μl/kg)组和乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg)组在给药前大鼠抬足的阈值无明显差别,而在给药10min后的阈值异氟烷原液(50μl/kg)组高于乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg)组;④给予5%福尔马林50μl 2h后大鼠脊髓背角的Fos蛋白的表达,发现无论是在I-II层还是III-VI层,异氟烷原液(50μl/kg)组FLI神经元数目都明显高于乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg)组;⑤给予5%福尔马林50μl 2h后大鼠脊髓背角的c-fos mRNA的表达,发现异氟烷原液(50μl/kg)组c-fos mRNA的表达明显高于乳化异氟烷(50μl/kg)组,而两组c-fos mRNA的表达都明显低于生理盐水(50μl/kg)组。
     研究结论:异氟烷原液和乳化异氟烷直接作用于脊髓水平均能够产生明显的镇痛作用,其部分作用机制与抑制脊髓Fos蛋白和c-fos mRNA表达有关。
With technology developing quickly, the drugged state is still obscure which is not same as dormancy, without memoy, without instinct, without pain. The general anesthesia includes analgesia, sedation, muscle relaxation and immobility in response to pain. In previous studies, the four elements were mixed. It mixed multiple effects so that we can not know the mechanisms inhalation anesthetics produce anti-nociception.
     Objective:
     In our study, we administered isoflurane by intrathecal administration directly to the spinal cord for the first time. By using behavioral, immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR research works, we studied below problems:
     1.Can isoflurane liquid and emulsified isoflurane exert antinociceptive effects at the spinal level?
     2. Can isoflurane liquid and emulsified isoflurane alter Fos protein and the c-fos expression in the dorsalhorn of spinal cord?
     Our results can provide direct evidence that inhalation anesthetics produce anti-nociception at the spinal level.
     Methods:
     We observed the change of the number of flinches of the injected paw of intrathecal isoflurane liquid and emulsified isoflurane. Moreover, the rat’s paw withdrawal threshold for mechanical stimuli and latency forheat stimuli were measured. At the same time, we also observed the effects of isoflurane liquid and emulsified isoflurane on Fos protein and the c-fos expression in the dorsalhorn of spinal cord by using immunohistochemistry technique.
     Results:
     A: Intrathecal isoflurane liquid(50μl/kg and 25μl/kg) and emulsified isoflurane(50μl/kg and 25μl/kg) can inhibit the flinching induced by formalin.
     B: Intrathecal isoflurane liquid(50μl/kg and 25μl/kg) and emulsified isoflurane(50μl/kg and 25μl/kg) can prolong the rat’s paw withdrawal latency forheat stimuli.
     C: Intrathecal isoflurane liquid(50μl/kg and 25μl/kg) and emulsified isoflurane(50μl/kg and 25μl/kg) can increase the rat’s paw withdrawal threshold for mechanical stimuli.
     D: Intrathecal isoflurane liquid(50μl/kg and 25μl/kg) and emulsified isoflurane(50μl/kg and 25μl/kg) can inhibit Fos protein expression in the dorsalhorn of spinal cord.
     E: The c-fos expression in groups of the intrathecal administration of isoflurane liqid or emulsified isoflurane was lower than that of group of the intrathecal administration of saline significantly.
     Conclusion:
     The results indicate that intrathecal administration of isoflurane liquid or emulsified isoflurane exert antinociceptive effects at the spinal level.
引文
1. Abbott F V: Peripheral and central antinociceptive actions of ethylketocyclazocine in the formalin test. Eur J Pharmac. 1988,152: 93-100.
    2. A K Adams: The delayed arrival: from Davy (1800) to Morton (1846). J R Soc Med .1996,89: 96-100.
    3. Alreja M,Mutalik P,Nayar U Manchanda SK: The formalin test: a tonic pain model in the primate. Pain .1984,20: 97-105.
    4. BeecherhK: The measurement of pain: prototype for the quantitative study of subjective responses. Pharmacol Rev. 1957,9: 59-209.
    5. Besterh,Besson JM,Bernard JF: Organisation of the efferent projections from the parabrachial area to thehypothalamus: a PHA-L study in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1997,383: 245-81.
    6. Biber B,Johannesson G,Lennander O,Manner J,Sonanderh,Werner O: Intravenous infusion ofhalothane dissolved in fat.haemodynamic effects in dogs. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1984,28: 385-9.
    7. Biber B,Manner J,Werner O:halothane by the iv route in experimental animals. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand .1982,26: 658-9.
    8. Bullitt E: Expression of c-fos-like protein as a marker for neuronal activity following noxious stimulation in the rat. J Comp Neurol 1990,296:517-30.
    9. Carli G.,Farabollini F,Fontani G: Effects of pain,morphine and naloxone on the duration of animalhypnosis. Behav Brain Res. 1981,2: 373-85.
    10. CascorbihF,Helrich M,Krantz JC Jr,Baker LR,Rozman RS,Rudo FG:hazards of methoxyflurane emulsions in man. Anesth Analg. 1968,47: 557-9.
    11. Chapman V,Honore P,Buritova J,Besson JM: The contribution of NMDA receptor activation to spinal c-fos expression in a model of inflammatorypain. Br J Pharmacol. 1995,116: 1628-34.
    12. Curran T,Peters G, Everen VC: FBJ murine osteosarcoma virus: identification and molecular cloning of biologically active provival DNA. J Virol .1982,44: 674-82.
    13. Davyh: Researches , Chemical and Philosophical; Chiefly Concerning Nitrous Oxide,or Dephlogisticated Nitrous Air,and its Respiration. London. 1800,556.
    14. Dennis SG,Melzack R: Pain modulation by 5-hydroxytriptaminergic agents and morphine as measured by three pain tests. Expl Neurol. 1980,69: 260-70.
    15. Draisci G , Iadorola MJ: Temporal analysis of increases in c-fos ,preprodynorphin and preproenkephalin mRNAs in rat spinal cord. Mol Brain Res. 1989,6: 31-7.
    16. Dubner R: Methods of assessing pain in animals,in Textbook of Pain. Churchill Livingston Edinburgh. 1994,293-302.
    17. Dubuisson D,Dennis SG.: The formalin test: a quantitative study of the analgesic effects of morphine,meperidine,and brain stem stimulation in rats and cats. Pain. 1977,4: 161-74.
    18. Dwyer R,Coppel DL: Intravenous injection of liquidhalothane. Anesth Analg .1989,69: 250-5.
    19. Eger EI,Liu J,Koblin DD: Molecular properties of the "ideal" inhaled anesthetics: Studies of fluorinated urethanes,ethanes,propanes and butanes. Anesth Analg. 1994,79: 245-51.
    20. Eger RP,Macleod BA: Anaesthesia by intravenous emulsified isoflurane in mice. Can J Anaesth. 1995,42: 173–6.
    21. Eisenberg E,Vos BP,Strassman AM: The NMDA antagonist Memantine blocks pain behavior in a rat model of formalin-induced facial pain. Pain.1993,54: 301-7.
    22. Elizabeth Pennisi: So Much More to Know. Science. 2005,309: 78-102.
    23. Feldman DS , Buccafusco JJ: Spinal muscarinic , glutamatergic and GABAergic receptor systems in cardiovascular regulation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997,281: 274-83.
    24. Feldman SH,Covino BG: A chronic model for investigation of experimental spinal anesthesia in the dog. Anesthesiology. 1981,54: 148-52.
    25. Ferreira SH,Lorenzetti BB,Rae GA: Is methylnalorphonium the prototype of an ideal peripheral analgesic? Eur J Pharmac. 1984,99: 23-9.
    26. Ferreira SH,Molina N,Vettore O: Prostaglandinhyperalgesia. V. A peripheral analgesic receptor for opiates. Prostaglandins. 1982,23: 50-3.
    27. Follenfant RL , Harrdy GW , Lowe LA , Schneider C , Smith TW: Antinociceptive effects of a novel opioid peptide BW443C compared with classical opiates;peripheral versus central actions. Br J Pharmac. 1988,93: 885-92.
    28. Franks NP: Structural basis for the inhibition of firely luciferase by a general anesthetic. Biophy J. 1998,75: 2205-11.
    29. Franks NP,Lieb WR: Do general anesthetics act by competitive binding to specific receptors? Nature. 1984,310: 599-601.
    30. Franks NP,Lieb WR: Mapping of general anaesthetic target sites provides a molecular basis for cutoff effects. Nature. 1985,316: 349-51.
    31. Franks NP,Lieb WR: Stereospecific effects of inhalational general anesthetic optical isomers on nerve ion channels. Science. 1991,254: 427-30.
    32. Goetzl FR,Burril DY,Ivy AC: A critical analysis of algesimetric methods with suggestions for a useful procedure. Q Bull Northwest Univ Med Sch. 1943,17: 280-91.
    33. Haley JE,Dickenson AH,Schachter M: Electrophysiological evidence for arole of bradykinin in chemical nociception in the rat. Neurosci Lett. 1989,97: 198-202.
    34. Hammond DL: Inference of pain and its modulation from simple behaviors,in Issues in Pain Measurement: Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Raven Press New York. 1989,12: 69-91.
    35. HandwerkerhO,Brune K: Deutschsprachige Klassiker der Schmerzforshung- Classical German Contributions to Pain Research. Tagblatt-Druckerei KGhassfurt. 1987.
    36. Hargreaves KM,Joris JL: The peripheral analgesic effects of opioids. Am Pain. Soc J. 1993,2: 51-9.
    37. Hargreaves K,Dubner R,Brown F,Flores C,Joris J: A new and sensitive method for measuring thermal nociception in cutaneushyperalgesia. Pain. 1988,32: 77-88.
    38. Hunskaar S,Fasmer OB,Hole,K: Formalin test in mice,a useful technique for evaluating mild analgesics. J Neurosci Methods. 1985,14: 69-76.
    39. Hunskaar S,Hole K: The formalin test: dissociation between inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain. Pain. 1987,30: 103-14.
    40. Hunt SP,Pini A,Evan G: Induction of c-fos-like protein in spinal cord neurons following sensory stimulation. Nature. 1987,328: 632-4.
    41. Hunter JC,Woodburn VL,Durieux C,Pettersson EK,Poat JA,Hughes J: c-fos antisense oligodeoxynucleotide increases formalin-induced nociception and regulates preprodynorphin expression. Neuroscience. 1995,65: 485-92.
    42. Iadarola MJ,Douglass J,Civelli O,Naranjo JR: Differential activation of spinal cord dynorphin and enkephalin neurons duringhyperalgesia: Evidence using cDNAhybridization. Brain Res. 1988a. 455: 205-12.
    43. Iadarola MJ,Brady LS,Draisci G,Dubner R: Enhancement of dynorphin gene expression in spinal cord following experimental inflammation: Stimulus specificity,behavioral parameters and opioid receptor binding. Pain.1988b,35: 313-26.
    44. J Sutton,GAharrison,JBhickie: Accidental intravenous injection ofhalothane. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1971,43: 513-20.
    45. Jason A Campagna,Keith W Miller,Stuart A Forman: Mechanisms of Actions of Inhaled Anesthetics. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2003,25: 36-8.
    46. Jian-Xin Zhou,Jin Liu. The effect of temperature on solubility of volatile anesthetics inhuman tissues. Anesth Analg. 2001,93: 234-8.
    47. Jian-Xin Zhou,Nan-Fu Luo,Xiao-Min Liang,Jin Liu: The efficacy and safety of intravenous emulsified isoflurane in rats. Anesth Analg. 2006,102: 129-34.
    48. Johannesson G,Aim P,Biber B,Lennander O,Werner O:halothane dissolved in fat as an intravenous anaesthetic to rats. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1984,28: 381-4.
    49. Jones RM: Desflurane and sevoflurane: Inhalation anaesthetics for this decade? Br J Anaesth. 1990,65:527.
    50. Joris JL,Dubner R,Hargreaves KM: Opioid analgesia at peripheral sites: a target for opioid release during stress and inflammation. Anesth Analg. 1987,66: 1277-81.
    51. JW Sandison,S Sivapragasam,JAhayes,MO Woo-Ming: An experimental study of pulmonary damage associated with intravenous injection ofhalothane in dogs. Br J Anaesth. 1970,42: 419-24.
    52. Kawamoto M,Suzuki N,Takasaki M: Acute pulmonary edema after intravenous liquidhalothane in dogs. Anesth Analg. 1992,74: 747-52.
    53. Kehl LJ,Gogas KR,Lichtblau L,Pollock CH,Mayes M,Basbaum AI, Wilcox GL: The NMDA antagonist MK801 reduces noxious stimulus-evoked Fos expression in the spinal cord dorsalhorn. In Proceedingsof the VIth world congress on pain. Amsterdam. 1991: 307-11.
    54. Khan IM,Marsala M,Printz MP: Intrathecal nicotinic agonist-elicited release of excitatory amino acids as measured by in vivo spinal microdialysis in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996,278: 97–106.
    55. Koblin DD: Mechanisms of action. In: Miller RD,editor. Anesthesia. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 1991:51-83.
    56. KorkmazhA , Maltepe F , Erbayraktar S: Antinociceptive and neurotoxicologic screening of chronic intrathecal administration of ketorolac tromethamine in the rat. Anesth Analg. 2004,98: 148-52.
    57. Krantz JC Jr,CascorbihF,Rudo FG: The intravenous administration of methoxyflurane (penthrane?) emulsions in animals and man. Anesth Analg. 1962,41: 257-62.
    58. Kristensen JD,Post C,Gordh T Jr,Svensson BA: Spinal cord morphology and antinociception after chronic intrathecal administration of excitatory amino acid antagonists in the rat. Pain. 1993,54: 309-16.
    59. Lai YL,Smith PM,Lamm WJE,Hildebrandt J: Sampling and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid for chronic studies in awake rats. J Appl Physiol. 1983,54: 1754-7.
    60. Laster MJ,Fang Z,Eger EI: Specific gravities of desflurane,enflurane,halothane,isoflurane,and sevoflurane. Anesth Analg. 1994,78: 1152-3.
    61. Levine JD,Taiwo YO: Involvement of the mu-opioid receptor in peripheral analgesia. Neuroscience. 1989,32: 571-5.
    62. Lineberry CG: Laboratory animals in pain research. Methods in Animal Experimentation,Academic Press,New York. 1981,6: 237-311.
    63. Liu J , Laster MJ , Koblin DD: A cutoff in potency exists in the perfluoroalkanes. Anesth Analg. 1994,79: 238-44.
    64. Ma QP,Woolf CJ: Basal and touch-evoked Fos-like immunoreactivity duringexperimental inflammation in the rat. Pain. 1996,67: 307-16.
    65. Mene′trey D,Gannon A,Levine JD,Basbaum AI: Expression of c-fos in interneurons and projection neurons of the rat spinal cord in response to noxious somatic,articular,and visceral stimulation. J Comp Neurol. 1989,285: 177-95.
    66. Meyer hH. Zur theorie der alkoholnarkose. I. Mitt. Welche eigenschaft der anasthetica bedingt ihre narkotische wirkung? Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1899,42:109-18.
    67. Millan MJ,Millan MH,Czlonkowski A,Hollt V,Pilcher CWT,Herz A,Colpaert FC: A model of chronic pain in the rat: Response of multiple opioid systems to adjuvant-induced arthritis. J Neurosci. 1986,6: 899-906.
    68. Millan MJ,Millan MH,Pilcher CWT,Czlonkowski A,Herz A,Colpaert FC: Spinal cord dynorphin may modulate nociception via a-opioid receptor in chronic arthritis. Brain Res. 1985,340: 156-9.
    69. Miller AD , CurranT , Verma IM: C-fos protein can induce cellular transformation: a noval mechanism of activation of a cellular oncogene .Cell. 1984,36: 51-60.
    70. Morgan JI,Curran T: Stimulus-transcription coupling in neurons: Role of cellular immediate-early genes. Trends Neurosci. 1989,12: 459-62.
    71. Morgan JI,Curran T: Stimulus-transcription coupling in the nervous system: Involvement of the inducible proto-oncogenes fos and jun. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1991,14: 421-51.
    72. Murray CW,Porereca F,Cowan A: Methodological refinements to the mouse paw formalin test,an animal model of tonic pain. J Pharmac Meth. 1985,20: 175-86.
    73. Nelson DR,Koymans L,Kamataki,Stegeman JJ,Feyereisen R,Waxman DJ: P450 superfamily: update on new sequences,gene mapping,accessionnumbers and nomenclature. Pharmacogenetics.1996,6: 1-42.
    74. Nishikawa K,MacIver MB: Agent-selective effects of volatile anesthetics on GABA receptor-mediated synaptic inhibition inhippocampal interneurons. Anesthesiology. 2001,94: 340-7.
    75. Noguchi K,Kowalski K,Traub R,Solodkin A,Iadarola MJ,Ruda MA: Dynorphin expression and Fos-like immunoreactivity following inflammation inducedhyperalgesia are colocalized in spinal cord neurons. Mol Brain Res. 1991,10: 227-33.
    76. Norman RI,Hirst R: Anaesthetic potency of inhalation agents in independent of membrane microviscosity. Br J Anaesth. 1997,78: 290-8.
    77. O’Keefe J: Spinal cord mechanisms subserving pain perception. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis,McGill University,1964.
    78. Overton E: Studien uber die narkose. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer,1901.
    79. Parsons CG,Czlonkowski A,Stein C,Herz A: Peripheral opioid receptor mediating antinociception in inflammation. Pain. 1990,41: 81-93.
    80. Parsons CG,Herz A: Peripheral opioid receptors mediating antinociception in inflammation. J Pharmac Exp Ther. 1990,255: 795-802.
    81. P Berman,M Tattersall: Self-poisoning with intravenoushalothane. Lancet. 1982,1: 340.
    82. Presley RW,Mene′trey D,Levine JD,Basbaum AI: Systemic morphine suppresses noxious stimulus-evoked Fos protein-like immunoreactivity in the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci. 1990,10: 323-35.
    83. R Dwyer,DL Coppel: Intravenous Injection of Liquidhalothane. Anesth Analg. 1989,69: 250-5.
    84. Ramabadran K,Bansinath M: A critical analysis of the experimental evaluation of nociceptive reactions in animals. Pharmacol Res. 1986,3:263-70.
    85. Rios L,Jacob JJC: Inhibition of inflammatory pain by naloxone and its N-methyl quaternary analogue. Life Sci. 1982,31: 1209-12.
    86. Rios L,Jacob JJC: Local inhibition of inflammatory pain by naloxone and its N-methyl quaternary analogue. Eur J Pharmac. 1983,96: 277-83.
    87. Roche AK,Cook M,Wilcox GL,Kajander KC: A nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor (L-NAME) reduces licking behavior and Fos-labelling in the spinal cord of rats during formalin-induced inflammation. Pain. 1996,66: 331-41.
    88. Rosland JH,Tjolsen A,Miehle B,Hole K: The formalin test in mice: effect of formalin concentration. Pain.1990,42: 235-42.
    89. Ruda MA,Iadarola MJ,Cohen LV,Young WS: In situhybridization histochemistry and immunocytochemistry reveal an increase in spinal dynorphin biosynthesis in a rat model of peripheral inflammation andhyperalgesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1988,85: 622-6.
    90. Ryan SM,Watkins LR,Mayer DJ,Maier SF: Spinal pain suppression mechanisms may differ for phasic and tonic pain. Brain Res .1985,334: 172-75.
    91. Serpell MG,DeLeo JA,Coombs DW: Intrathecal catheterization alone reduces autotomy after sciatic cryoneurolysis in the rat. Life Sci. 1993,53: 1887-92.
    92. Shigehito Sato,Yasuyuki Baba: Prolongation of Epidural Anesthesia in the Rabbit with the Use of a Biodegradable Copolymer Paste Containing Lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 1995,80: 97-101.
    93. Stein C,Millan MJ,Shippenberg TS,Herz A: Peripheral effect of fentanyl upon nociception in inflamed tissue of the rat. Neurosci Lett. 1988,84: 225-8.
    94. Stemp LI: Intravenous injection of liquidhalothane. Anesth Analg 1990,70:568.
    95. Storkson RV,Kjorsvik A,Tjolsen A,Hole K: Lumbar catheterization of the spinal subarachnoid space in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1996,65: 167-72.
    96. Sun WZ,Shyu BC,Shieh JY: Nitrous oxide orhalothane,or both,fail to suppress c-fos expression in rat spinal cord dorsalhorn neurones after subcutaneous formalin. Br J Anaesth. 1996,76: 99-105.
    97. Taber RI: Predictive value of analgesic assays in mice and rats,in Narcotic Antagonists,Advances in Biochemical Psychopharmacology,Raven Press,New York. 1974,8: 191-211.
    98. Takahashih,Shibata M,Ohkubo T,Naruse S: Formalin-inducedminor tremor response as an indicator of pain. Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 1984,84: 353-62.
    99. Tj?lsen A,Hole K: Animal models of analgesia,in Pharmacology of Pain. Springer Verlag Berlin. 1997,1-20.
    100.Tsang BK,He Z,Ma T: Decreased paralysis and better motor coordination with microspinal versus PE10 intrathecal catheters in pain study rats. Anesth Analg. 1997,84: 591- 4.
    101.Vierck CJ,Cooper BY: Guideline for assessing pain reactions and pain modulation in laboratory animal subjects,in Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Raven Press New York. 1984,l 6: 305-22.
    102.Vitcha JF: Ahistory of forane. Anesthesiology. 1971,35: 4.
    103.Von Bergen NH,Subieta A,Brennan TJ: Effect of intrathecal non-NMDA EAA receptor antagonist LY293558 in rats: a new class of drugs for spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002,97: 177-82.
    104.Wade S Kingery,Geeta S Agashe,Tian Z Guo,Shigehito Sawamura,Frances Davies,J David Clark,Brian K Kobilka,Mervyn Maze: Isoflurane and Nociception Spinalα2A Adrenoceptors Mediate Antinociception whileSupraspinalα1 Adrenoceptors Mediate Pronociception. Anesthesiology. 2002,96: 367-74.
    105.Wang BC , Hillman DE , Li D , Turndorfh: Lumbar subarachnoid catheterization in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991,38: 685-8.
    106.Watkins LR: Algesiometry in laboratory and man: current concepts and future directions,in Issues in Pain Measurement: Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Raven Press New York. 1989,12:249-65.
    107.Weihe E,Millan MJ,Hollt V,Nohr DH,Herz A: Induction of the gene encoding pro-dynorphin by experimentally induced arthritis enhances staining for dynorphin in the spinal cord of rats. Neuroscience. 1989,31: 77-95.
    108.Wheeler-Acetoh,Cowan A: Standardization of the rat paw formalin test for the evaluation of analgesics. Psychopharmacology. 1991,104: 35-44.
    109.Williams S,Evan GI,Hunt SP: Changing patterns of c-fos induction in spinal neurons following thermal cutaneous stimulation in the rat. Neuroscience. 1990,36:73-81.
    110.Xiao-Lin Yang,Han-Xiang Ma,Jin Liu: Comparison ofminimum Alveolar Concentration between Intravenous Isoflurane Lipid Emulsion and Inhaled Isoflurane in Dogs. Anesthesiology. 2006,104: 482-7.
    111.Yaksh TL,Rudy TA: Chronic catheterization of the spinal subarachnoid space. Physiol Behav. 1976,17:1031-6.
    112.Yaksh TL,Hua XY,Kalcheva I: The spinal biology inhumans and animals of pain states generated by persistent small afferent input. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA .1999,96: 7680-6.
    113.Yan Rao,Yan-lin Wang,Wen-sheng Zhang,Jin Liu: Emulsified Isoflurane Produces Cardiac Protection After Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rabbits. Anesth Analg. 2008,106: 1353-9.
    114.YY Poon,Alice YW Chang,SF Ko,SamuelhH Chan: An Improved Procedure for Catheterization of the Thoracic Spinal Subarachnoid Space in the Rat. Anesth Analg. 2005,101: 155-60.
    115.Zhang YH , Chen Y , Zhao ZQ: Resiniferatoxin reversibly blocks adjuvant-induced thermalhyperalgesia in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003,481: 301-4.
    116.Zhou JX,Luo NF Liang XM,Liu J: Solubilities and Theoretical Saturated Concentrations of Isoflurane andhalothane in Lipid Emulsion at 20°C Anesthesiology. 2001,95: 115.
    117.Zimmermann M,Herdegen T: Control of gene transcription by Jun and Fos proteins in the nervous system: Beneficial orharmful molecular mechanisms of neuronal response to noxious stimulation? Am Pain Soc J. 1994,3: 33- 48.
    118.柴云飞,宋海波,杨静,刘陕岭,张文胜,杨经文,刘进: 8%乳化异氟醚兔硬膜外麻醉作用观察.四川医学. 2007,28: 473-5.
    119.冀群升,章静波: c-fos原癌基因的研究进展.国外医学·分子生物分册. 1994,16: 152-6.
    120.孙海峰,王泉云,梁小民,张贞雄,刘进:乳化异氟醚腹腔注射对大鼠的麻醉作用与安全性.中华麻醉学杂志. 2004,24: 51-3.
    121.杨小霖,张文胜,马汉祥,杨宗斌,刘爱杰,罗南富,刘进:犬静脉注射乳化异氟醚最低肺泡有效浓度的研究.临床麻醉学杂志. 2006,22: 204-6.
    122.周建新,罗南富:续贯法测定乳化挥发麻醉药在大鼠静脉诱导中的半数有效量.麻醉与监护论坛. 2002,9: 24-6.
    123.周建新,罗南富,刘进:续贯法测定乳化挥发麻醉药在大鼠静脉诱导中的半数有效量.麻醉与监护论坛. 2002,9: 24-6.
    124.周建新,罗南富,刘进:乳化异氟醚静脉麻醉的量效关系.中国临床药理学杂志. 2003,19: 437-9.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700