陕南茶园黄褐土改良研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
土壤是茶树生长发育的基地,是提供水、肥、气、热的场所。茶树所需的养料和水分都是从土壤中取得的,所以土壤的肥力、土壤的温度、土壤的水分和土壤的酸碱度对茶树根系和地上部生长发育都具有极为重要的作用。
     陕南茶园,土质多为黄褐土、黄棕壤。黄褐土质地偏粘,呈中性或偏酸性,中下层具有粘盘,有机质含量低,缺磷少氮,保水性和通气性差,严重阻碍了茶树根系的生长。
     本研究对西北农林科技大学茶叶科技示范基地典型黄褐土进行不同改良处理,研究了改良后土壤肥力变化情况、茶苗的生长情况及茶叶品质的变化情况,以期探索茶园黄褐土改良的最佳方案,为陕南茶产业的发展和茶叶品质的提高奠定基础。取得的主要结果如下:
     土壤pH值是影响茶树生长的重要因素。本研究中施用有机肥的几种处理均不同程度地降低了土壤的pH值,达到了适宜茶树生长的pH值水平。其中农家肥处理的最好,pH为5.65,比未处理土壤pH降低了13.5%。其次是腐殖和油渣质处理的,pH分别为5.85和5.84,比未处理前土壤pH降低了10.4%。
     施用有机肥(油渣、腐殖质、农家肥)的处理及秸秆还田对土壤肥力的提高效果极显著,四种处理后期土壤有机质含量、N含量、K含量、P含量均显著高于其他处理;施用农家肥处理的土壤有机质含量最高,达到2.21 g/kg,比对照提高了111.65%,P含量也是所有处理中最高的,为26.76 mg/kg,比对照提高了194.71%;施用油渣的土壤N含量最高,为91.36 mg/kg,比对照提高了48.31%;秸秆还田土壤K含量最高,为339.78 mg/kg,比对照提高了78.20%;种植绿肥的土壤肥力也有提高,但没有施用有机肥的效果好。
     除了掺砂处理,其他处理均不同程度的提高了茶叶中的两种或多种内含物质的含量,提高了茶叶的品质。其中油渣处理显著提高了茶叶中的茶多酚、氨基酸、咖啡碱和水浸出物含量,分别为19.54%、2.34%、2.96%、43.90%,酚氨比为8.369,极显著低于对照,茶叶品质最好;农家肥、腐殖质、毛苕子、秸秆和草木樨处理均显著提高了茶叶中氨基酸、咖啡碱和水浸出物含量,酚氨比也都极显著低于对照;掺砂客土处理的茶叶中茶多酚、咖啡碱和水浸出物含量增大,但氨基酸含量少,酚氨比大,茶叶鲜爽度差。
     综合不同处理对西乡茶园土壤肥力和茶叶品质的影响结果,在对陕南茶园黄褐土土壤改良方面建议加大油渣、农家肥、腐殖质等有机肥的施用量,并结合秸秆还田。
Soil is the base for growth and development of tea,it provide tea plants with water, fertilizer, gas, and heat. The necessary nourishment and moisture of tea plant are obtained from the soil, therefore, soil fertility, temperature, moisture and pH play a very important role in the growth of tea root and shoot.
     Most of the soil of tea garden in southern Shaanxi is yellow cinnamon soil or yellow brown. Yellow cinnamon soil is clay, neutral or acidic. There is a clay pan in the middle and lower plate. Because of poor water holding capacity, soil organic matter, poor nitrogen and poor phosphorus in yellow cinnamon soil, the growth of tea roots are seriously restricted.
     In the study, in order to explore the optimum scheme of yellow cinnamon soil improvement and lay solid foundations for the development of Shaanxi tea industry, the yellow cinnamon soil in the technology demonstration state of Northwest A&F university was improved by different means, and the soil fertility and tea growth status and tea quality after improving was studied. The main results are follows:
     Soil pH value is an important factor to the growth of tea plant. The pH values of the soil treated with organic manure lowed than that of untreated soil, and became Suitable for tea growth. The best treatment was farmyard manure, in which the pH value was 5.65, 13.5% lower than the untreated. Followed was oil residue and humus, in which the pH value wree 5.84 and 5.85 respectively, 10.4% lower than the untreated.
     Treated with organic manure (oil residue, humus, farmyard manure) and straw could improve the soil fertility significantly, and the content of N, K, P and soil organic matter were significantly higher than other treatments. The highest soil organic matter was the soil treated with farmyard manure, and it was 2.21 g/kg, 111.65% higher than the control, and the P content in it was 26.76 mg/kg, 194.71% higher than the control; the highest N content was the soil treat with oil residue, 91.36 mg/kg, 48.31% higher than control; the highest K content was the soil treat with straw, 339.78 mg/kg higher, 78.20% higher than control. The fertility of the soil treated with green manure was also enhanced, but was lower than that of soil treated with organic fertilizer.
     The treatments except sand-doped could improve two or more substances in the tea to different extent. The content of tea polyphenols, amino acids, caffeine and water extract of the soil treated with oil residue were 19.54%, , 2.34%, 2.96%, 43.90% respectively, significantly higher than that in the control, and the ratio of tea polyphenol to amino acid of it was 8.391, significantly lower than that of the control. The treatment with farmyard manure, humus, hairy vetch, straw, sweet clove all improved the content of tea polyphenols, amino acids, caffeine and water extract significantly. The ratio of tea polyphenol to amino acid was remarkably lower than that of the control. The treatment with sand could enhance the contents of tea polyphenol, caffeine and water extract, and reduce the content of amino acids, and the ratio of tea polyphenol to amino acid increased.
     Complexes the effects of different treatments on soil fertility and tea quality, the optium improvement of yellow cinnamon soil improvement was increasing the oil residue, farmyard manure, humus and other organic fertilizer, combined with straw returning.
引文
[1]周巨根,朱永兴.茶学概论[M].中国中医药出版社. 2007, 8.
    [2]陈元镇.浅析茶园土壤条件与茶树生长的关系[J].茶叶科学技术. 2003, (2): 28-29.
    [3]浙江农业大学.茶树栽培学(第二版)[M].北京:农业出版社. 1984.
    [4]王亚莉,王学增,王广铭.河南省名优茶产区土壤条件研究[J].信阳农专学报. 1995, 5 (3): 18-23.
    [5]李海华,刘建武,李树人,等.土壤—植物系统中重金属污染及作物富集研究进展[J].河南农业大学学报, 2000 ,34 (1): 30-34.
    [6] Shui Shangnan and Kaison Chang. Contributions ofTechnical Progress to the Tea Economy—A Quantitative Assessment[R]. International Tea Workshop: Advances in Tea Scineces and Technologies and the World Tea Economy.9-11 July 1996, Beijing, China.
    [7]王凯荣,龚惠群.山区茶园土壤肥力性状及其对茶叶产量和品质的影响[J].茶叶. 1994, 20(1): 13-17.
    [8]韩文炎,许允文.低丘红壤茶园土壤养分限制因子及平衡施肥研究[J].浙江农业学报. 1995, 7 (5): 387- 391.
    [9]袁小坦.拓荣县茶园水土流失现状及防治措施[J].茶叶科学技术. 2006, 1: 29-30
    [10]李以暖,王凯荣.茶叶产量和品质与地质环境关系的研究[J ].有色金属矿产与勘查, 1996, 5 (4): 247- 252
    [11]张亚莲,罗淑华.湖南茶园土壤养分调查与丰缺指标研究报告[J].茶叶通讯, 1998(1): 7-14.
    [12]查世新,朱江,周毅华.茶叶中微量元素的含量与地质背景的关系探讨[J].茶业通报. 2002. 24(4): 28-29.
    [13]方玲,伊仁青,张庆孝等.不同母质的土壤对乌龙茶生化品质的影响[J].福建农业大学学报, 1999, 28 (4): 461-465
    [14]陆景冈,李健.名茶狮峰龙井形成的地质背景[M].土壤地质, (第一辑).北京:农业出版社, 1992, 7.
    [15]唐根年,陆景冈,王援高等.浙江省及邻近地区名茶形成的土壤地质环境分析[J].茶叶科学, 2001,21 (2):85-89
    [16]曹顺爱,吕军.土壤母质及其物理性状与茶叶品质关系[J].茶叶. 2003, 29 (1): 13- 16.
    [17]浙江农业大学.茶树栽培学[M].农业出版社, 1989, 98-201.
    [18]王效举,陈鸿昭.三峡地区茶园土壤化学特征与茶叶品质的关系[J].植物生态学报, 1994, 18(3): 253- 260.
    [19]黎星辉,黄启为,唐和平.土壤地球物理化学特征对名优茶品质的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报, 1996, 22 (6): 542-546.
    [20]吴珍,王新军,张晓虎等.商洛山区土壤状况与适种中药材研究[J].水土保持通报. 2005, 25(5): 62-65.
    [21]张学利,杨树军,张百习.我国林木根际土壤研究进展[J].沈阳农业大学报, 2002, 33(6): 461-465.
    [22]刘芷宇.根际微域环境的研究[J].土壤, 1993, 25(5): 225-230.
    [23] HANSONPJ, EDWARDSNT, GARTENCT, etal. Separating root and soil microbial cont ributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations[J]. Biogeochem, 2000, 48: 115-146.
    [24] STEERJ, HARRISJA. Shifts in the microbial community in rhizosphere and nonrhizosphere soil duringthe growth of Agrost is stolonifera [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2000, 32: 869-878.
    [25] STROML. Root exudation of organic acids: importance to nutrient availability and the calcifuge and calcirapeseed behavior of plants [J]. Oikos, 1997, 80: 459-466.
    [26]廖丽霞,胡红青,贺纪正.中南地区几种地带性土壤表面电荷特征与pH的关系[J].华中农业大学学报, 2005, 24(1): 29-32.
    [27]陈铭,刘更另.可变电荷土壤的表面化学性质[J].土壤通报, 1993, 5: 238-240.
    [28] Johansen J E, Binnerup S J. Contribution of Cytophaga-like Bacteria to the Potential of Turnover of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus by Bacteria in the Rh izo sphere of Barley (Hordeum vulg are L.) [J]. M icrobial E cology, 2002, (3): 298- 306.
    [29] Kalyan K Mondal, Prem Dureja, Jeevan Prakash Verma. Management of Xanthomonas camprestris p v. malvacearum Induced Blight of Cotton Through Phenolics of Cotton Rhizobacterium [J]. Current Microbiology, 2001, 43 (5): 0336- 0339.
    [30] Sindhu S S, Gup ta S K, Dadarwal K R. Antagonistic effect of Pseudomonas spp. on pathogenic fungi and enhancement of growth of green gram (Vigna radiata) [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1999, 29 (1): 62- 68.
    [31] Gup ta C, Dubey R, Maheshwari D. Plant growth enhancement and supp ression of Macrophomina phaseolina causing charcoalrot of peanut by fluorescent Pseudomonas[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2002, 35 (6): 399- 405.
    [32] Jens Frankow ski, Matteo Lorito, Felice Scala, et al. Purification and properties of two chitinolytic enzymes of Serratia plymuth ica HRO-C48[J]. Archives of Microbiology, 2001, 176 (6): 421- 426.
    [33]田永辉,魏杰.不同无性系茶树品种的根际细菌及酶活性动态研究[J].西南农业学报, 2001, 14 (4) : 63- 66.
    [34]梁月荣,陆建良,刘祖生.茶树根际土壤抗酸铝微生物的分离与初步鉴定[J].茶叶科学, 1999, 19 (2): 110- 114.
    [35]田永辉.不同树龄茶树根际固氮菌组成及多样性研究[J].福建茶叶, 2000, (3): 19- 23.
    [36] Anita Pandey, Lok Man S Palni. The rhizo sphere effect of tea on soil microbes in a Himalayan monsoonal location [J]. Biology and Fertility of S oils, 1996, 21 (3): 131- 137.
    [37]刘建军,陈海滨,田呈明等.秦岭火地塘林区主要树种根际微生态系统土壤性状研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1998, 4(3): 52-56.
    [38]张淑香,高子勤.连作障碍与根际微生态研究Ⅱ.根系分泌物与酚酸物质[J].应用生态学报,2000a,11(1):152-156.
    [39]张淑香,高子勤,刘海玲.连作障碍与根际微生态研究Ⅲ.土壤酚酸物质及其生物学效应[J].应用生态学报, 2000b, 11(5):7 41-744.
    [40]徐长伦,杨新平,王志方等.哈密瓜根系与根际微生态分析研究[J].中国微生态学杂志, 1997, (1): 45-47.
    [41]林敏,平淑珍,尤崇杓.粪产碱菌对水稻根质子分泌作用及根际微生态的影响[J].植物生理学报, 1992, 18(3): 233-238.
    [42]徐凤花,催占利,刘永春等.保护性施氮在缓解大豆重茬根际微生态障碍中的效应[J].生物技术, 1998, 8(3): 41-44.
    [43]柴强,黄鹏,黄高宝.间作对根际土壤微生物和酶活性的影响研究[J].草业学报. 2005, 14(5):105-110.
    [44]周东,欧孝夺,杜静等.生物技术改良膨胀土探讨[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版). 2004, 29 (3): 197-201.
    [45]孙海新,刘训理.茶树根际微生物研究[J].生态学报. 2004, 24(7): 1353-1357.
    [46]胡克福,郭桂义,王亚莉等.信阳茶园低产土壤障碍因子诊断及改良[J].河南农业科学. 2002, (8): 27-28.
    [47]马成泽.有机质含量对土壤几项物理性质的影响[J].土壤通报. 1994, 25(2):65-67.
    [48]洪松,郑泽厚,陈俊生.湖北省黄棕壤若干微量元素环境地球化学特征[J].土壤学报,2001, 38(1): 89-95.
    [49]张甘霖,龚子同.淹水条件下土壤中元素迁移的地球化学特征[J].土壤学报, 1993, 30(4): 355-365.
    [50]徐凤琳,李学垣,黄巧云.鄂、湘两省土地土壤粘粒矿物的研究Ⅱ.莽山北坡土壤中的粘粒矿物[J].土壤学报, 1992, 29(1): 48-55.
    [51]刘凡,徐凤琳,李学垣.鄂湘两省山地土壤粘粒矿物的研究Ⅲ.神农架自然保护区北坡土壤的粘粒矿物与表面化学特性[J].土壤学报, 1996, 33(1): 59-69.
    [52]张晓虎,王新军.商洛山区主要中低产田改良利用探析[J].水土保持通报. 2005, 25(4): 84-86.
    [53]孙克刚,张学斌,王英等.粉煤灰磁化肥在南阳黄褐土上的增产效果[J].再生资源研究. 2001, 2: 32-34.
    [54]王朴,王雅洁,胡红等.红壤和黄褐土根际土壤养分变化的研究[J].华中农业大学学报. 2006, 25(5): 520-523.
    [55]王贻俊,黄丽,洪军.黄棕壤和黄褐土粘粒胶膜的元素组成特征与粘粒矿物[J].华中农业大学学报. 2003, 22(1): 30-34.
    [56]王晓萍等.茶园土壤地力退化现状及其防治途径.中国土地退化防治研究[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社, 1990: 355-301.
    [57]陈元镇,范金帅.闽东南茶园赤红壤肥力特性的研究[J].茶叶科学技术. 2004, 3: 7-8.
    [58]陈荣冰.福建茶叶可持续发展的有效途径——开发生产有机茶[J].茶叶科学技术, 2000, (1): 4-7.
    [59]涂良剑,李秀峰,詹全宁等.有机肥的施用对乌龙茶产量品质的影响[J].茶叶科学技术. 2006(2): 10-14.
    [60]刘超良,吴克宁,吕巧灵.信阳毛尖茶生长环境的土壤特性分析[J].河南农业大学学报. 2006, 40(3): 274-278.
    [61]陈永怀,杨尚灿,吴艳等.茶园套种马铃薯对土壤理化性状影响及经济效益初探[J].茶叶科学技术. 2005, 2: 17-18.
    [62]陈慕松.闽东侵蚀劣地幼龄茶园套种绿肥的生态效应[J].茶叶科学技术. 2003, (1): 8-10.
    [63]李清海.宁城县玉米秸秆粉碎还田保护性耕作技术分析[J].农村牧区机械化. 2006, 69(4): 31-33.
    [64]肖润林,彭晚霞,宋同清等.稻草覆盖对红壤丘陵茶园的生态调控效应[J].生态学杂志. 2006, 25 (5): 507-511.
    [65]徐凯明.汉中无公害茶浅析[J].茶业通报. 2004, 26(2): 87.
    [66]鲍士旦主编.土壤农化分析(第3版) [M].中国农业出版社. 2007. 3.
    [67]钟萝主编.茶叶品质理化分析[M].上海科学技术出版社, 1989.
    [68]高峻岭,李祥云,宋朝玉,李振清,王圣健.不同有机肥配比对大葱产量及品质的影响[J].北方园艺. 2007(11): 40-42.
    [69]唐劲弛,唐颢,冯平万.不同有机肥在茶园的施用效果比较研究[J].广东农业科学. 2006(7): 46-48.
    [70]顾谦,陆锦时,叶宝存.茶叶化学[M].合肥:中国科学技术出版社, 2002, 144-152.
    [71]陆松侯,施兆鹏主编.茶叶审评与检验(第三版)[M].中国农业出版社. 2005.
    [72]田永辉,梁远发,魏杰,王家伦.茶园土壤物理性状对茶叶品质的影响研究[J].蚕桑茶叶通讯, 2000, (3):14-16.
    [73]李国满.茶叶品质与土壤条件的关系[J].茶叶通讯, 1990, (4).
    [74]李永菊,庞晓莉,司辉清.高山云雾出好茶——浅谈茶叶品质与环境条件的关系[J].茶业通报. 2006, 28(3): 115-116.
    [75]吴洵.大力加强茶园有机肥料的施用与开发[J ] .中国茶叶, 1995 (6): 4– 5.
    [76]黄勤楼,翁伯奇,刘明香等.建阳市以沼气为纽带的生态农业建设实践与思考[ J ].福建农业学报, 1999, 14 (4): 57-61.
    [77]沈善敏.氮肥在中国农业发展中的贡献和农业中氮的损失[ J ].土壤学报, 2002, 39 (增刊): 12-25.
    [78]李静,夏建国.氮磷钾与茶叶品质关系的研究综述[J].中国农学通报, 2005, 21, (1): 62-65.
    [79]庄晚芳.茶树生理[M].北京.中国农业出版社. 1992: 103-104.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700