摘要
经济的迅速发展推动了人类社会和人类文明的进步,人类在满足自身物质和精神享受的同时,给地球带来了各种各样的生态安全问题。国外从20世纪70年代就开始关注生态安全问题,而国内从20世纪90年代末期才开始公开关注生态安全问题。近几年来,国内对于生态安全的研究显著增多。目前,生态安全研究已成为国内外研究的热点。
银川为宁夏的省会城市。经过几十年的快速发展,银川已成为西北地区举足轻重的城市。银川市地处西北内陆干旱区,雨雪稀少,蒸发强烈,气候干燥,风大沙多,存在土地沙漠化、土壤盐渍化、沙尘暴、水资源短缺等问题,生态环境脆弱。对银川市生态安全现状进行评价分级,因地制宜的应对生态安全威胁,对于银川市生态环境保护、生态安全建设等具有一定的指导意义。
本文通过总结生态安全方面的基础理论、研究现状和研究方法,基于PSR模型,建立了银川市生态安全评价指标体系;利用RS与GIS技术对银川市生态安全评价指标信息进行提取,并在此基础上建立了2007年银川市生态安全评价指标数据库;基于常权和变权加法平均综合模型对2007年银川市生态安全现状进行评价,最后提出了生态安全调控措施。主要结论如下:
(1)运用基于常权和基于变权加法平均综合模型对银川市生态安全进行评价对比,发现运用变权方法得到的结果更加符合实际情况。
(2)银川市生态安全水平以较差和一般为主,两者占到银川市总面积的68.17%。其中,较差水平面积为3704.05km2,占银川市总面积的38.77%;其次为一般水平,面积为2809.35km2,占银川市总面积的29.4%;生态安全水平良的面积为1113.84km2,占银川市总面积的11.66%;生态安全水平差的面积为1927.75km2,达到银川市总面积的1/5以上,为20.18%;银川市不存在生态安全水平优的区域。
(3)银川市整体生态安全处于较差水平。临河镇生态安全水平最高,生态安全指数为6.47,大新镇生态安全水平最低,生态安全指数为2.74。银川市乡镇生态安全以差和较差水平为主,两者分别占到13个和9个乡镇,生态安全水平一般的乡镇有5个。
(4)针对综合分析结果,在分析原因的基础上提出了银川市生态安全分级管制的思路,把银川市划分为四级管制区:一级管制区基本上集中在城区和交通线周围;二级管制区主要集中在灌区两侧和灵武市中部;三级管制区主要集中在贺兰山山前洪积倾斜平原、黄河冲积平原东侧以及灵武市北部和南部零星区域;四级管制区主要集中在贺兰山自然保护区、白芨滩自然保护区。最后,针对不同级别的管制区提出了具有针对性的生态安全调控措施。另外,针对宁东能源化工基地,提出了专门的生态安全调控措施。
The rapid development of economic promotes the progress of human society and human civilization. However, when the human satisfy their own material and spiritual enjoyment, a series of problems of ecological security occur one after another. In Foreign, the human begin to focus on the problems of ecological security from the 1970s, however, in domestic, the human begin to do it until the late 1990s. In recent years, the study on the ecological security increases obviously. At present, the study on ecological security has become a hot spot at home and abroad.
Yinchuan is the capital of Ningxia's province. With the fast development of eomomic, Yinchuan has become one of the leading cities in Northwest China. However, Yinchuan City is located in Northwest Arid Region of China, which has following characteristics:the scarcity of rain and snow, strong evaporation, dry climate, strong wind, more sand and so on. There are some problems, such as land desertification, soil salinization, sandstorm, water shortages and other issues. So, the ecological environment of Yinchuan is fragile. So it is necessary to comprehensively evaluate the eclogical security level of Yinchuan city. It is hepeful to guide the construction of Yinchuan environmental protection and ecological security.
The basic theory of ecological security, research status and research methods were summarized in this thesis. The ecological security assessment index system of Yinchuan was established based on PSR model. The information of the ecological security assessment index was extracted by using RS and GIS technology. The ecological security evaluation database of Yinchuan City was established. And then, the level of ecological security of Yinchuan was evaluated based on the constant weight and the variable weight average additive synthesis model. At last, some ecological security control measures were made. The main conclusions were as follows:
(1)Based on evaluating the level of ecological security of Yinchuan by using the constant weight and the variable weight average additive synthesis model,we found that the result obtained by using the variable weight average additive synthesis model was more practical.
(2)The ecological security of Yinchuan was mainly of lower and general level. They accounted for 68.17% of the total area of Yinchuan. The proportion of the lowerer level was 38.77%, and the area was 3704.05km2. The proportion of the general level was 29.4%, and the area was 2809.35km2. The proportion of the higher level was 11.66%, and the area was 1113.84km2. The proportion of the lowest level was 20.18%, and the area was 1927.75km2. There was no the highest level in Yinchuan.
(3)The whole level of ecological security of Yinchuan was mainly the lower. The level of ecological security of Linhe Town was the highest, which was 6.47. The level of ecological security of Daxin Town was the lowest, which was 2.74. The ecological security of local villages and towns were mainly the lowest and lower level, which accounted for 13 and 9 respectively. The number of the general level was 5.
(4)Considering the evaluation results and the contributing factors, the idea of the graded control of ecological security was proposed. Yinchuan City was divided into four zones:The first control zone was largely concentrated in urban areas and transport lines. The second control zone was largely concentrated in both sides of irrigation district and the central of Lingwu. The third control zone was largely concentrated in the Helan Mountains piedmont alluvial plain sloping, east of the Yellow River alluvial plain and the northern and southern parts of Lingwu City. The fourth control zone was largely concentrated in Helan Mountain Natural Reserve, Bletilla Beach Natural Reserve. At last, some control measures of ecological security were proposed to different graded control zones. In addition, some special control measures were made for construction of Ningdong Energy Chemical Base.
引文
[1]FAO Proceedings. Land Quality Indicators and their Use in Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development[M]. Proceedings of the Workshop organized by the Land and water Development Division FAO Agriculture Department,1997,2-5,106
[2]Jian-zhou Gong, Yan-sui Liu, Bei-cheng Xia,et al. Urban ecological security assessment and forecasting,based on a cellular automata model:A case study of Guangzhou,China[J]. Ecological Modelling,2009,220(24):3612-3620
[3]Jyldyz Sydygalieva. Ecological security:an urgent necessity for centra Asia[EB/OL].http://www.cacianalst.org/Headline_2.htm,2001-12-05
[4]Qing Huang, Ranghui Wang, Zhiyuan Ren, et al. Regional ecological security assessment based on long periods of ecological footprint analysis[J]. Resource,Conservation and recycling,2007,51(1):24-41
[5]Shu-heng Hu, Kai-ya Wu, Jia-quan Wang. Study pre-warning of ecological security on basis of fuzzy optimize in Anhui province[J]. Journal of Biotechnology,2008,136(l):32
[6]Tran L T,Knight C G,O'Neill R V. Fuzzy Decision Analysis for Integrated Environmental Vulnerability Assessment of the Mid-Atlantic Region[J]. Environment Management,2002: 29(6):845-859
[7]Wackernagel M,and Rees W. Our ecological footprint:reducing human impact on the earth[M]. Gabriola, Gabriola Island, BC:New Society Publishers,1996:61-83
[8]Westing A H. The environmental component of comprehensive security[J], Bulletin of Peace Proposals,1989,20(2):129-134
[9]Xiaoqing Shi, Jingzhu Zhao, Ouyang Zhiyun. Assessment of eco-security in the Knowledge Grid e-science environment[J]. Journal of Systems and Software,2006,79(2):246-252
[10]Yan-Zhi Zhao, Xue-Yong Zou, Hong Cheng, et al. Assessing the ecological security of the Tibetan plateau:Methodology and a case study for Lhaze County[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2006,80(2):120-131
[11]蔡守秋.论环境安全问题[J].安全与环境学报,2001,1(5):28-32
[12]曹新向.旅游地生态安全预警评价指标体系与方法研究.以开封市为例[J].环境科学与 管理,2006:31(3):50-54
[13]常斌,熊利亚,侯西勇等.基于空间的生态足迹与生态承载力预测模型-以甘肃省河西走廊地区为例[J].地理研究,2007,26(5):940-948
[14]陈超,黄东风,邱孝煊等.闽江中上游流域农业面源污染调查评估及其防治技术探讨[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(增刊):368-374
[15]陈敏,张丽君,王如松等.1978年-2003年中国生态足迹动态分析[J].资源科学,2005,27(6):132-139
[16]陈国阶.论生态安全[J].重庆环境科学.2002,24(3):1-3,18
[17]陈国阶,何锦峰.生态环境预警的理论和方法探讨[J].重庆环境科学,1999,21(4):8-11
[18]陈家琦.水安全保障问题浅析[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(3):276-279
[19]崔胜辉,洪华生,黄云凤等.生态安全研究进展[J].生态学报,2005,25(4):861-868
[20]党安荣,王晓栋,陈晓峰等.ERDAS IMAGING遥感影像处理方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005
[21]党碧玲,任志远,王菊翠.区域生态安全的模糊多层次评价[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(3):105-108
[22]窦贻俭,苏慧,高超等.江苏省生态足迹分析与可持续发展研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(6):519-513
[23]方创琳.西北干旱区生态安全系统结构与功能的监控思路初论[J].中国沙漠,2000,20(3):326-328
[24]方一平,陈国阶.西昌市生态空间占用及其生态系统安全评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(3):212-217
[25]方振锋.基于改进PSR模型的生态安全评价研究[D].华中科技大学硕士论文,2007
[26]冯耀忠.干线输油管道生态安全问题及其解决途径[J].国外油气储运,1995,13(3):63-66
[27]傅伯杰.区域生态环境预警的原理与方法[J].应用生态学报,1993,4(4):436-439
[28]符国基.海南省生态足迹研究[M].北京:化学化工出版社,2007
[29]符海月,李满春,毛亮等.基于生态足迹的土地利用规划生态成效定量分析-以河北省廊坊市为例[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(2):225-235
[30]高长波,陈新庚,韦朝海等.熵权模糊综合评价法在城市生态安全评价中的应用[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(10):1923-1927
[31]高长波,陈新庚,韦朝海等.珠江三角洲城市生态安全水平对比研究[J].环境科学与技 术,2006,29(5):65-66
[32]龚建周,厦北成.城市景观生态学与生态安全-以广州为例[M].北京:科学出版社,2008
[33]龚建周,夏北成,陈健飞等.基于3S技术的广州市生态安全景观格局分析[J].生态学报,2008,28(9):4323-4333
[34]郭明,肖笃宁,李新.黑河流域酒泉绿洲景观生态安全格局分析[J].生态学报.2006,26(2):457-465
[35]郭中伟.建设国家生态安全预警系统与维护体系:面对严重的生态危机的对策[J].科学导报,2001(1):54-56
[36]何琼,孙世群,吴开亚等.区域生态安全评价的AHP赋权方法研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,27(4):434-437
[37]胡宝清,廖赤眉,严志强等.广西都安瑶族自治县农业可持续发展的生态安全评价[J].农村生态环境,2003,19(2):16-19,23
[38]黄青,任志远.论生态承载力与生态安全[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(2):11-17
[39]李晶,任志远.GIS支持下陕北黄土高原生态安全评价[J].资源科学,2008,30(5):732-736
[40]李佩武,李贵才,张金花等.城市生态安全的多种评价模型及应用[J].地理研究,2009,28(2):293-302
[41]李晓燕,张树文.基于景观结构的吉林西部生态安全动态分析[J].干旱区研究,2005,22(1):57-62
[42]李宗尧,杨桂山,董雅文.经济快速发展地区生态安全格局的构建-以安徽沿江地区为例[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(1):106-113
[43]林忠,王永平.基于信息熵灰色关联法的高速公路网评价研究[J].交通与运输,2008:122-124
[44]刘国臻.土地利用分区管制论略[J1.政法学刊,2003,20(5):26-28
[45]刘红,王慧,刘康.我国生态安全评价方法研究述评[J].自然生态保护,2005,(8):34-37
[46]刘勇,刘友兆,徐萍.区域土地资源生态安全评价-浙江嘉兴市为例[J].资源科学,2004,26(3):69-75
[47]莱斯特·R·布朗.建设一个持续发展的社会[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1984
[48]黎晓亚,马克明,傅伯杰等.区域生态安全格局:设计原则与方法[J].生态学报,2004,24(5):1055-1062
[49]黎夏,刘凯.GIS与空间分析-原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2006
[50]马克明,黎晓亚等.区域生态安全格局:概念与理论基础[J].生态学报,2004,24(4):761-768
[51]毛峰,宾国澍,肖劲松.生态足迹与区域可持续发展评价[J].地域研究与开发,2005,24(5):43-47
[52]孟旭光.我国国土资源安全面临的挑战及对策[J].中国人口资源与环境,2002,12(1):47-50
[53]孟兆鑫,李春艳,邓玉林.沱江流域生态安全预警及其生态调控对策[J].生态与农村环境学报,2009:25(2):1-8
[54]宁夏农业勘察设计院.宁夏土壤[M].宁夏:宁夏人民出版社,1990
[55]诺曼·迈尔斯著.王正平,金辉译.最终的安全[M].上海:上海译文出版,2001
[56]彭补拙,窦贻俭.用动态的观点进行环境综合质量评价[J].中国环境科学,1996(1):16-19
[57]彭建,王仰麟,张源等.滇西北生态脆弱区土地利用变化及其生态效应-以云南省永胜县为例[J].地理学报,2004,59(4):629-638
[58]邱微,赵庆良,李崧等.基于“压力-状态-响应”模型的黑龙江省生态安全评价研究[J].环境科学,2008,29(4):1148-1152
[59]屈芳青,周万村.RS和GIS支持下的若儿盖草原生态安全模糊评价[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(4):24-29
[60]曲格平.关注中国生态安全[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2004
[61]曲青林,曹爱霞,刘学录.兰州市土地利用生态安全评价[J].环境科学研究,2009,22(6):753-756
[62]任志远,张艳芳等.土地利用变化与生态安全评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2003
[63]邵东国,李元红.基于神经网络的干旱内陆河流域生态环境预警方法研究[J].中国农村水利水电,1999,4(6):10-12
[64]世界环境与发展委员会.我们共同的未来[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1997
[65]石明奎,彭昱,李恩东等.珠江上游少数民族农业区域生态安全预警研究-贵州境内22县实证分析[J].中国人口资源与环境,2005:15(6):50-54
[66]宋冬梅,肖笃宁,张志城等.石羊河下游民勤绿洲生态安全时空变化分析[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(3):335-342
[67]苏楠,赵延治,史培军.西藏高原生态安全评价方法与应用-以西藏自治区曲松县为例[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(5):142-145
[68]苏伟,陈云浩,武永峰等.生态安全条件下的土地利用格局优化模型研究-以中国北方农 牧交错带为例[J].自然科学进展,2006,16(2):207-214
[69]苏维词,李久林.乌江流域生态环境预警评价初探[J].贵州科学,1997,15(3):207-214
[70]孙凡,李天云,黄轲等.重庆市生态安全评价与监测预警研究-理论与指标体系[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2005:27(6):757-762
[71]万利,陈佑启,谭靖等.北京郊区生态安全动态评价与分析[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(2):238-244
[72]王棒,关文彬,吴建安等.生物多样性保护的区域生态安全格局评价手段-GAP分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(J):192-196
[73]王丰年.论我国生态安全的现状和对策[J].自然辩证法研究,2004:20(4):61-64
[74]王耕.区域生态安全概念及评价体系的再认识[J].生态学报,2097,27(4):1627-1637
[75]工耕,王利,吴伟.区域生态安全概念及评价体系的再认识[J].生态学报,2007,27(4):43-47
[761王耕,吴伟.基于GIS的西辽河流域生态安全空间分异特征[J].环境科学,2005,26(5):28-23
[77]王桂玲,王丽萍.河北省面源污染分析[J].海河水利,2004(4):29-30、45
[78]王亮.祟明岛景观生态安全格局分析[J].国土与自然资源研究,2007,54(2):54-55
[79]王龙.山西煤炭开发与生态环境预警初探[J].生态经济,1995,(5):32-36
[80]王明全,王金达,刘景双.城市生态安全评价研究-以长春市为例[J].干早区资源与环境,2007,21(3):72-76
[81]王鹏,庄大昌.衡阳市生态足迹分析与生态环境保护对策[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(2):246-268
[82]王强,杨京平.我国草地退化及其生态安全评价指标体系的探索[J].水土保持学报,2003:17(6):27-31
[83]吴春笃,谭宁,解清杰.镇江市生态安全的PSR-AHP评价[J].人民长江,2008,39(3):42-44
[84]吴国庆.区域农业可持续发展的生态安全及其评价探索[J].生态经济,2001(8):22-25
[85]吴国庆.农业可持续发展的生态安全研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2003,11(2):141-143
[86]邬建国.景观生态学-格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000
[87]吴开亚.生态安全理论形成的背景探析[J].合肥工业大学学报,2003,17(5):24-27
[88]吴开亚,孙世群,聂磊.生态安全的灰关联评价方法探讨[J].安徽农业大学学报,2004,31(3):368-371
[89]夏军,朱一中.水安全的度量:水资源承载力的研究与挑战[J].自然资源学 报,2002,17(3):262-269
[90]谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003:18(2):189-196
[91]谢花林,张新时.城市生态安全水平的物元评判模型研究[J].地理学与国土研究,2004,20(2):87-90
[92]谢花林,张新时.城郊区生态安全水平的量度及其对策研究-以北京市海淀区为例[J].中国人口资源与环境,2004,14(3):23-26
[93]肖笃宁,陈文波,郭福良.论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(3):354-358
[94]肖生春,肖洪浪,肖笃宁等.额济纳蒙古族民间景观格局反映的区域环境状况[J].冰川冻土,2006,28(4):492-499
[95]徐中民,程国栋,张志强.生态足迹方法的理论解析[J].中国人口资源与环境,2006,16(6):69-78
[96]徐中民,张志强,程国栋等.中国西部12省(区市)的生态足迹[J].地理学报,2001,56(5):559-610
[97]杨京平,卢剑波.生态安全的系统分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002
[98]杨勇,任志远.泾河流域中下游生态安全评价与分析[J].干旱区研究,2009,26(3):441-446
[99]叶文虎,孔青春.环境安全:21世纪人类面临的根本问题[J].中国人口资源与环境,2001,11(3):42-44
[100]叶明武,陈振楼,王军等.城镇地区生态安全评价及对策-以上海崇明岛为例[J].城市环境与城市生态,2007,20(1):9-13
[101]银川市统计局.银川统计年鉴2007[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2008
[102]俞孔坚.生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J].生态学报,1999,19(1):8-15
[103]俞孔坚,王思思,李迪华等.北京市生态安全格局及城市增长预景[J].生态学报,2009,29(3):43-47
[104]曾辉,刘国军.基于景观结构的区域生态风险分析[J].中国环境科学,1999,19(5):454-457
[105]张保华,张二勋,张秀省.农业生态安全评估指标体系研究[J].河南农业科学,2005(12):5-7
[106]张大任.洞庭湖生态环境预警[J].地理学与国土研究,1991,7(2):42-44
[107]张雷,刘慧.中国国家资源环境安全问题初探[J].中国人口资源与环境,2002,12(1):41-46
[108]张世银,周加来.城市化指标体系构建与评析[J].技术经济,2007,26(3):32-37
[109]张婷婷,吴胜军,杜耘等.黄石市土地利用变化的生态安全评价[J1.华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,40(2):296-300
[110]张文霖.主成分分析在SPSS中的操作应用[J].市场研究,2005(12):31-34
[111]张小虎,雷国平,袁磊等.黑龙江省土地生态安全评价[J].中国人口资源与环境,2009,19(1):88-93
[112]张小青.利用植被维护架空输电线路的生态安全(续)[J].电工技术杂志,1993(5):36-39
[113]张燕,吴玉鸣.西南溶岩区生态环境可持续发展的生态足迹分析-以广西为例[J].冰川冻土,2006,28(2):293-298
[114]张玉良.前苏联植物保护的生态安全方法[J].苏联科学与技术,1994(3):35-36
[115]张月丛,孟宪峰,赵志强等.承德市1999-2004年生态足迹与土地生态承载力分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(71:37-40
[116]周珂,王权典.论国家生态环境安全法律问题[J].江海学刊,2003(1):113-120
[117]周文华,王如松.城市安全评价方法研究-以北京市为例[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(7):848-852
[118]周毅.中国生态环境安全[J].西北林学院学报,2003,18(1):109-112
[119]邹长新.内陆河流域生态安全研究-以黑河为例[D].南京:南京气象学院,2003
[120]邹长新,沈渭寿.生态安全进展研究[J].农村生态环境,2003,19(1):56-59
[121]邹秀萍,王毅,齐清文等.基于RS&GIS的西双版纳生态安全评价[J].生态经济:学术版,2008(1):24-27
[122]朱红波,张安录.中国耕地压力指数时空规律分析[J].资源科学,2007,29(2):105-108
[123]左伟.基于RS、GIS和Models的区域生态环境系统安全综合评价研究[D].南京师范大学博士论文,2002
[124]左伟.基于RS、GIS的区域生态安全综合评价研究[M].北京:测绘出版社,2004
[125]左伟,周慧珍,王桥.区域生态安全评价指标体系选取的概念框架研究[J].土壤,2003,35(1):2-7