干旱山区杏树肥水调控效应研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
杏(Prunus Armenniaca)蔷薇科,李属,落叶乔木,原产于我国。杏树抗逆性较强,其营养价值和药用价值较大,是山区和丘陵干旱地区脱贫致富的主栽树种之一。研究区(唐县游家佐)位于太行山东侧低山丘陵去,海拔100 m~500 m,该地区降雨量少,干旱明显,水资源供需矛盾尖锐,土壤养分含量比较低,如何提高本区灌溉水的利用效率、肥料利用效率成为当前农业节水、合理施肥的研究热点。本研究以5年生金太阳杏树为研究材料,通过灌溉保墒试验、施肥试验和灌溉保墒施肥试验,探讨不同灌水时间、灌溉量和保墒措施下农田土壤水分的动态变化规律以及不同施肥方式下土壤养分含量、叶片果实养分浓度及杏产量的变化规律,为该区合理施肥及节水灌溉提供数据支持,主要研究结果如下:
     1.在杏收获前期,增加灌水量可以提高土壤含水率;在整个生育期内,常规灌溉(CK)、滴灌(DI)、滴灌覆膜(PMDI)和控滴覆膜(PMRDI)的灌水量分别是66.6 mm、33.4 mm、33.4 mm和25.0 mm,各个处理下果实产量分别为9.79、9.10、9.55和8.29 kg/株,与常规灌溉比较,滴灌覆膜、滴灌和控滴覆膜处理节约灌水量分别是49.85%、49.85%和62.46%;滴灌覆膜、滴灌、控滴覆膜耗水量较常规灌溉分别减少8.18%、9.06%和11.39%;滴灌覆膜处理水分利用效率(WUE)最高,为7.934 kg·m~(-3);滴灌覆膜处理下可溶性固形物含量分别比控滴覆膜、滴灌和常规灌溉处理提高了2.38%、8.92%和12.95%。
     2.与不施肥(NF)相比,施肥可以提高100 cm土层养分含量、叶片及果实全氮磷钾浓度;与环状施肥(NR)和滴灌环状施肥(DR)相比,滴灌施肥(NW)方式下土壤养分含量更高;滴灌施肥叶片全氮浓度比不施肥、环状施肥、滴灌环状施肥分别提高9.12%、0.62%和0.94%;与不施肥相比施肥可显著提高果实纵径、果实横径、果形指数及果实产量;滴灌施肥、环状施肥和滴灌环状施肥处理下单株产量分别比不施肥处理提高34.75%、34.48%和25.00%;四种施肥方式下可溶性固形物、总糖及总酸含量差异显著,滴灌施肥方式下可溶性固形物含量最高,分别比环状施肥、滴灌环状施肥和不施肥处理下的可溶性固形物含量提高了2.28%、5.16%和8.00%。
     3.施肥量相同的情况下,滴灌施肥(NW)处理产量显著高于常规灌溉施肥(CK)处理;与滴灌施肥相比,对杏树进行覆膜保墒,可提高果实产量、水分利用效率;与常规灌溉施肥相(CK)比,覆膜+滴灌施肥(PM+NW)和滴灌施肥(NW)的水分利用效率分别提高了37.67%和33.28%,覆膜+滴灌施肥处理水分利用效率最高,为8.782 kg·m~(-3)。
Apricot (Prunus Armenniaca), rosaceae, prunus, deciduous arbors, native to China. Apricot has a strong stress resistance, large nutritive and medicinal value. Apricot is also one of the main plantings in mountain, hilly, and arid areas to accumulate wealth. The research area (You Jia-zuo village ,Tang county) is located on the eastern piedmont , low mountains and hills of Taihang Mountain at 100 m to 500 m altitude. This region rainfall is few, drought significantly, the water resource between supply and demand contradiction sharpen, soil nutrient content is relatively low. How to increase irrigation water use efficiency and fertilizer use efficiency has become present research focus of agricultural water saving and rational fertilization. The field experiment of 5-year-old Apricot Sol Aureus orchard, designed to have three different treatments (soil moisture conserving irrigation treatment, fertiliztion treatment and irrigation technique of mulching -fertilization treatment), to study the effects of different irrigation times , irrigation amount, soil moisture keeping measure on soil water dynamics and different fertilizer application method on the soil nutrient, leaf and fruit nutrient concentration, and yield variation regularities. In order to support the provide data for rational fertilization and water saving irrigation. The main results were as follows:
     1. Before the harvest stage, the added irrigation quantity could increase water content. During growth period, the irrigation quantity of conventional irrigation (CK), drip irrigation (DI), the plastic mulched drip irrigation (PMDI) and plastic mulched of regulated drip irrigation (PMRDI) were 66.6 mm, 33.4 mm, 33.4 mm and 25.0 mm, respectively. The yield of each per plant was 9.79 kg, 9.10 kg, 9.55 kg and 8.29 kg. Compared to the conventional irrigation, the plastic mulched drip irrigation, drip irrigation and plastic mulched of regulated drip irrigation saved water by 49.85%, 49.85% and 62.46%, respectively. Compared to the conventional irrigation, the plastic mulched drip irrigation, drip irrigation and plastic mulched of regulated drip irrigation decreased water consumption by 8.18%, 9.06% and 11.39%, respectively. The plastic mulched drip irrigation treatment of water use efficiency was 7.934 kg·m~(-3), which was the highest among four treatments. The soluble solids of plastic mulched drip irrigation treatment respectively increase 2.38%, 8.92% and 12.95% to plastic mulched of regulated drip irrigation, drip irrigation and conventional irrigation treatment.
     2. Compared to non-fertilization (NF), fertilization could increase 100 cm soil nutrient concentration, leaf and fruit total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration. Compared with deep-ditch fertilization (NR) and drip-deep-ditch fertigation, fertigation (NW) treatment had the higher soil nutrient concentration. Compared with non-fertilization, deep-ditch fertilization and drip-deep-ditch fertigation, fertigation treatment could increase the leaf total nitrogen concentration, the increased data as 9.12%, 0.62% and 0.94%, respectively. Fertilization could significantly increase fruit length, fruit width, fruit shape index and fruit yield. The yield per plant would be increased under fertigation , deep-ditch fertilization and drip-deep-ditch fertigation, the increased data as 34.75% , 34.48% and25.00%, respectively. The difference was significant of the soluble solids, total sugar, and total acids content among the fourth treatments. The fertigation treatment of soluble solids was the highest among the fourth treatments. The soluble solids of fertigation treatment respectively increase 2.28%,5.16% and 8.00% to deep-ditch fertilization,drip-deep-ditch fertigation and non-fertilization treatment.
     3. In the same fertilizer amount condition, the yield of fertigation(NW) was significantly greater than conventional irrigation and fertilization(CK). Compared with fertigation, the fruit yield and water consumption increased on the film-covered moisture conservation measures. Compared to the conventional irrigation and fertilization , the plastic mulched fertigation (PM+NW) and fertigation (NW) raised water use efficiency by 37.67% and 32.28%, respectively. The plastic mulched fertigation treatment of water use efficiency was 8.782 kg·m~(-3), which was the highest among three treatments.
引文
[1]山仑.节水农业的研究与实施[J].中国科学院院刊,1996,6:430-435.
    [2]黄修桥.灌溉用水需求分析与节水灌溉发展研究[C].西北农林科技大学博士学位研究生学位论文,2005.
    [3]尹光华,蔺海明.旱地春小麦集雨补灌增产机制初探[J].干旱地区农业研究,2001,19(2):55-60.
    [4]侯连涛,焦念元,韩宾,等.不同覆盖方式对土壤水分分布的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,26(1):47-50.
    [5]李久生,杜珍华,栗岩峰.壤土特性空间变异对地下滴灌水氮分布及夏玉米生长的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(6):1717-172.
    [6]危常州,马富裕,雷咏雯,等.棉花膜下滴灌根系发育规律的研究[J].棉花学报,2002,14(4):209-214.
    [7]马孝义,康绍忠,王凤翔,等.果树地下滴灌灌水技术田间试验研究[J]西北农业大学学报, 2000,28(1):57-61.
    [8]李光永,王小伟,黄兴法,等.充分灌与调亏灌溉条件下桃树滴灌的耗水量研究[J].水利学报,2001(9):55-58.
    [9]李巧珍,郝卫平,龚道枝,等.不同灌溉方式对苹果园土壤水分动态、耗水量和产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(2):128-133.
    [10]员学锋,吴普特,汪有科.地膜覆盖保墒灌溉的土壤水、热以及作物效应研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2006,25(1):25-29.
    [11]王丽萍,汪耀富,王伯武,等.覆盖集水措施对烟田土壤水分时空分布和利用效率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(5):117-119.
    [12]王进,欧毅,谢永红,等.山地李园树盘覆盖效应研究[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,28(4):601-605.
    [13]张福锁,王激清,张卫峰,等.中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):915-923.
    [14]张盛贵,韩舜愈,张珍,等.甘肃不同产地兰州大接杏成分分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2002,37(1):31-34.
    [15]河北农业大学主编.果树栽培学各论[M].北京:农业出版社,1980,193-195.
    [16]龙兴桂.现代中国果树栽培[M].北京:农业出版社,2000, 511-513.
    [17]王玉柱,孙浩元,杨丽.我国杏树发展现状分析及建议[J].中国农业科技导报,2003,(5)2:24-27.
    [18] http:// www.guoshu.jinnong.cn.
    [19] http://www.baike.baidu.com.
    [20]国家林业局编著.中国林业统计年鉴[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2008, 454-456.
    [21]中国统计出版社编著.河北省农村统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社2009, 237-239.
    [22]张振华,蔡焕杰.滴灌土壤温润体影响因素的实验研究,农业工程学报[J],2001,18(2):17-20.
    [23] Roth R L. Soil moisture distribution and wetting pattern from a point source. Proceedings of the second international drip irrigation congress, San Diego,CA,1974.
    [24]郭慧滨.史群国内外节水灌溉发展简介[R].
    [25]许平.我国微灌技术和设备现状及市场前景分析[J].节水灌溉,2002,1:33-36.
    [26]赵艳霞,王馥棠,刘文泉.2003.黄土高原的气候生态环境、气候变化与农业气候生产潜力.干旱地区农业研究,21(4):142-146.
    [27]贾运岗,张富仓,李培岭.大田滴灌条件下土壤水分运移规律的试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2007(26)6:15-17.
    [28]雷廷武.滴灌湿润比的解析设计[J].水利学报,1994,25(1):1-9.
    [29]李光永,曾德超.滴灌土壤湿润体特征值的数值算法[J].水利学报,1997,(7):1-6.
    [30]魏春阳.温室滴灌条件下黄瓜根区水分动态的研究[C].吉林大学硕士学位论文,2005年.
    [31]谢建波.低压地下滴灌土壤水分运动规律与数值模拟研究[C].西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文,2006.
    [32]胡笑涛.地下滴灌条件下灌水均匀度试验研究[C].西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文,2001.
    [33]吴巍,陈雨海,李全起.垄沟耕作条件下滴灌冬小麦田间土壤水分的动态变化,土壤学报,2006,(26)6:1011-1017.
    [34] Vijayakumar,-K.R.;Dey,-S.K.;Chandrasekhar,-T.R.;Devakumar,-A.S.;Mohankrishna,-T.;Sanjeeva-Rao; P.;Sethuraj; M.R.Irrigation requirement of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in the sub-humid tropics. Agric. Water Manage. 1998,35(3):245-259.
    [35]刘雪芹,范兴科.滴灌条件下土壤水分再分布过程研究[J]干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(7):42-45.
    [36]王舒.温室滴灌条件下湿润比对黄瓜和杏树生长的影响[C].中国农业大学硕士学位论文,2005.
    [37]杨素苗,李保国,齐国辉,等.灌溉方式对红富士苹果根系活力和新梢生长及果实产量质量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(5):181-184.
    [38] Chalmers D.J, van den Ende B. Prouductivity of peach trees factors affecting dry-weight distribution during tree growth [J].Ann.Bot.1975,39:423-432.
    [39] Reddy C.R,Reddy S.R. Scheduling irrigation for peanuts with variable amounts of available water[J].Agricultural Water Management,1993,23:1-9.
    [40]曾德超,彼得杰里.果实调亏灌溉密植节水增产技术的研究与开发[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1994.
    [41]高延军,裴冬,张喜英,等.棉花调亏灌溉效应研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(1):138-139.
    [42]史文娟,康绍忠,宋孝玉.棉花调亏灌溉的生理基础研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2004,22(3):91-95.
    [43]马福生,康绍忠,王密侠,等.调亏灌溉对温室梨枣树水分利用效率与枣品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(1):37-43.
    [44]郭相平,刘才良,邵孝侯,等.调亏灌溉对玉米需水规律和水分生产效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,1999,17(3):92-95.
    [45]莫江华.不同时期水分亏缺对烤烟产质量和水分养分利用的影响[C].广西大学硕士学位论文,
    [46]赵春明,王密侠,郑灵祥,等.调亏灌溉对梨枣树蒸腾作用和光合作用的影响[J].水利水电科技进展,2010(30)1:45-47.
    [47]王锋.干旱荒漠绿洲区调亏灌溉对西瓜水分利用与品质影响的研究[C].西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [48]常莉飞,邹志荣.调亏灌溉对温室黄瓜生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(23):7142-7144.
    [49]董国锋,成自勇,张自和,等.调亏灌溉对苜蓿水分利用效率和品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(5):201-203.
    [50]丁林,成自勇,赵元忠,等.调亏灌溉对蚕豆需水规律及水分利用效率的影响[J].节水灌溉,2007(5):27-29.
    [51] Li Fengmin,Guo Anhong,Wei Hong. Effects of clear plastic film mulch on yield of spring wheat[J].Field Crops Res,1999,63:79-86.
    [52] Niu JY, Gan YT, Zhang JW, et al. Postanthesis dry matter accumulation and redistribution in spring wheat mulched with plastic film[J].Crop Sci,1998,38:1562-1568.
    [53]黄介生,沈荣开.地膜覆盖技术的研究现状与展望[J].中国农村水利水电,1997,(增刊):80-81.
    [54]李毅,王文焰,门旗,等.宽地膜覆盖条件下土壤温度场特征[J].农业工程学报, 2001,17(3):32-36.
    [55]陈军锋,郑秀清,邢述彦,等.地表覆膜对季节性冻融土壤入渗规律的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2006(7):18-21.
    [56]胡芬,陈尚模.寿阳试验区玉米地农田水分平衡及其覆盖调控试验[J].农业工程学报,2000,16(4):146-148.
    [57] Mohapatra B K, Len Ka D, Naik D. Effect of plastic mulching on yield and water use efficiency in maize[J].Annals of Agric Res,1998,19:210-211.
    [58] Fisher P D. An alterative plastic mulching system for improved water management in dry land maize production[J].Agric Water Mange,1995,27:155-166(in Chinese).
    [59]毕继业,王秀芬,朱道林.地膜覆盖对农作物产量的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2008,24(11):172-175.
    [60]郭志东,刁培松.旱地冬小麦全生育期地膜覆盖穴播高产栽培技术的研究[J].农业工程学报, 1999,15(2):222-224.
    [61]马树庆,王琪,郭建平,等.东北地区玉米地膜覆盖增温增产效应的地域变化规律[J].农业工程学报, 2007,23(8):66-71.
    [62]马辉,梅旭荣,延昌荣,等.华北典型农区棉田土壤中地膜残留特点研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2008,27(2):570-573.
    [63]慕彩云.覆膜滴灌棉田蒸散量的模拟研究[C].石河子大学硕士学位论文,2005.
    [64]孟杰.膜下滴灌条件下土壤水盐运移田间试验研究[C].新疆农业大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    [65]崔伟敏.膜下线源滴灌土壤湿润区影响因素的研究[C].石河子大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    [66]钱卫鹏.大棚内膜下根系分区交替滴灌不同灌溉下限对甜瓜生长及水分利用效率的影响[C].西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [67]张永玲,肖让,成自勇.膜上灌对河西绿洲灌区玉米水分利用效率和产量的影响[J].节水灌溉,2010,5:9-14.
    [68]周新国,李彩霞,强小嫚,等.喷灌条件下液膜覆盖对玉米干物质积累及水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26 (11):43-48.
    [69]张海,高鹏程,牛秀峰,等.黄土退耕坡地膜下滴灌抗旱造林及减蚀效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,(18)6:190-192.
    [70]徐恒永,赵振东,张存良,等.氮肥对优质专用小麦产量和品质的影响Ⅰ.氮肥对产量及产量形成的影响[J].山东农业科学,2000(5):27-30.
    [71]刘安勋.氮肥对小麦籽粒氨基酸的贡献[J].青海农林科技,2000(9):18-23.
    [72]彭永欣,姜雪忠,郭文善,等.氮素对小麦籽粒营养品质调节效应研究[A].凌启鸿主编.稻麦研究新进展[C].南京:东南大学出版社,1991.
    [73]杜会英,薛世川,孙志梅,等.腐植酸复合肥对葡萄品质及产量的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2004,27(4):63-66.
    [74]王伟楠,任广鑫,杨改河,等.叶面施沼肥对杏树果实品质的影响研究[J].西北农业学报,2008,17(2):132-136.
    [75]常美花,师占君,吴文荣.配方施肥对温室桃杏果营养生长及果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2006( 2):60- 61.
    [76]吴其飞,黄达明,管国强.茎部注射硒肥对金桔的生长及果实品质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(6):92-95.
    [77]吴其飞,黄达明,董英.茎部注射稀土元素对金柑生长及果实品质的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2002,35(10):1254-1259.
    [78]王岩,谭博,马兵钢,等.生物有机肥对库尔勒香梨果实品质和净光合速率的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(6):1107-1111.
    [79]徐舫,蒋进,张云生,等.施肥对新疆引进欧李生长及营养品质的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(4):842-847.
    [80]何学涛,牛俊义,刘建华.不同施肥水平对苹果产量及品质的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报, 2010,45(2):83-86.
    [81]郭石生,韩梅,刘雪莲.硫酸钾镁肥对黄瓜产量和品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2010(18):27-28.
    [82]陈栋,涂美艳,杜晋城,等.不同施钾量对曙光油桃产量和品质的影响[J].西南农业学报,2010,23(4):1173-1176.
    [83]王跃进,张朝红.西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版) [J].2002,30(4):70-72.
    [84] Dasberg S and Bresler E. Drip irrigation manual[M].International irrigation information center. Publication No.9, Bet Dagan, Israel, 1985.
    [85] Goldberg D, Gornat B and Rimon D. Drip irrigation principles, design and agricultural practices[M]. Drip irrigation scientific publications, Kfar Shmariahu, Israel, 1976.
    [86] Neilsen D, Parchomchuk Pet al. Using soil solution monitoring to determine the effects of irrigation management and fertigation on nitrogen availability in high density apple orchards[J].J.Am.Soc.Hortic.Sci.,1998, 123(4):706-713.
    [87] Gardenas A I, Hopmans J W, Hanson B R, et al. Two dimensional modeling of nitrate leaching for various fertigation scenarios under micro-irrigation[J].Agric Water Manage, 2005,74(3):219-242.
    [88] Skinner RH, Hanson J D, Benjamin JG. Nitrogen uptake and partitioning under alternate and every-furrow irrigation[J].Plant and Soil,1999,210: 11-20.
    [89]侯振安,李品芳,吕新,等.不同滴灌施肥方式下棉花根区的水、盐和氮素分布[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(3):549-557.
    [90]栗岩峰,李久生,饶敏杰.滴灌施肥时水肥顺序对番茄根系分布和产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(7):205-20.
    [91]张辉,张玉龙,虞娜,等.温室膜下滴灌灌水控制下限与番茄产量、水分利用效率的关系[J].中国农业科学,2066,39(2):425-432.
    [92]张学军,赵营,陈晓群,等.滴灌施肥中施肥量对两年生蔬菜产量、氮素平衡及土壤硝态氮累积的影响[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(11):2535-25445.
    [93]何华,康绍忠,曹红霞.地下滴灌埋管深度对冬小麦根冠生长及水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2001,17(6):31-33.
    [94]郭大应,谢成春,熊清瑞,等.喷灌条件下土壤中的氮素分布研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2000,19(2):76-77.
    [95]王虎,王旭东.滴灌施肥条件下土壤水分和速效磷的分布规律[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然学版),2007,35(5):141-146.
    [96]郭金强.棉花膜下滴灌水氮耦合机理的研究[C].石河子大学硕士学位论文,2005.
    [97]鲍士旦主编.土壤农化分析[M].北京,中国农业出版社,2000.45-440.
    [98] GB/T 12295-90,果蔬可溶性固形物含量测定.
    [99]宁正祥.食品成分分析手册[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,1997,26-28.
    [100]仝月澳,周厚基.果树营养诊断法[M].北京:农业出版社,1982,127-130.
    [101]李瑛.不同时期和不同水量灌溉对苜蓿种子产量影响的研究[C].新疆农业大学硕士学位论文,2004.
    [102]徐呈祥,马艳萍,沈发武,等.滴灌优化沙地首红苹果生长和结果研究[J].中国水土保持,2004,10:34-36.
    [103] Ebel R C, Proebsting E L, Patterson M E. Regulated deficit irrigation may alter apple maturity, quality, and storage life[J]. Hort Science, 1993,28(2):141-143.
    [104]白钢栓,张占山,李志熙.仁用杏园不同土层土壤养分含量的测定[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(2):223-230.
    [105]姜远茂,张宏彦,张福锁.北方落叶果树养分资源综合管理理论与实践[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:41-146.
    [106]张丽君,冯殿齐,王爱喜,等.杏树叶片及土壤营养元素含量分析[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(10):192-196.
    [107]范晓峰,童德中,王宝明,等.杏叶片矿质营养研究[J].山西农业科学,1999,27(1):48-52.
    [108]别智鑫,翟梅枝,李春茂,等.不同施肥处理对‘秦美’猕猴桃贮藏性及其品质的影响[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(9):1950-1954.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700