美国优秀教师评价标准研究
|
摘要
随着中国教育体制改革进程的加快,教师的质量问题也越来越引起大家的关注。如何提高教师质量,培养优秀的教师成为中国教师教育改革的焦点。虽然中国自古以来就要尊师重教的传统,但我国至今还没有制定统一的优秀教师评价标准,在选拔和评价优秀教师方面也存在某些问题。
美国是世界上制定教师评价标准比较完善的国家之一,虽然以全美专业教学标准委员会为代表的民间机构制定的优秀教师评价标准并不是官方行为,但其所带来的积极的影响却引起了广泛的关注。它不仅为教师提供了行为规范,明确优秀教师应该知道的和必须做的,而且促进了美国广大中小学教学质量的提高和教师专业化的发展。因此,了解美国优秀教师的评价标准不仅有助于我们借鉴经验,建立合理的优秀教师评价标准,而且有助于我们更好的提高师资水平,促进我国教育事业的发展。
本文的基本框架如下：首先提出选题的背景和理论依据,分析美国优秀教师评价标准的内容体系和实施程序,并在分析美国优秀英语语言教师评价标准的基础上总结出美国优秀教师评价标准的特点、经验及启示,以便于我们更好的了解美国优秀教师的评价的全过程,从而为我国的优秀教师评价标准提供一定的经验。
With the rapid development of the reform of the educational system in China, the issue about the quality of teachers has attracted more and more attention. How to improve the quality of teaching and train outstanding teachers has become the focus of the teacher education reform of China. Although China has a tradition of respect for teachers and education, there are still some problems in the aspect of selecting and evaluating the outstanding teachers. Moreover, so far China has not yet formulated a unified evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers.
The United States is one of the counties which have framed the relatively perfect evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers. Although the evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers made by the National Professional Teaching Standards Board on behalf of American unofficial organizations is nongovernmental, its positive impact has caused wide concern. It not only provides a code of conduct for teachers, clearly illuminating what a good teacher should know and how he or she should do it, but also promotes the general primary and secondary schools of the United States to improve the quality of teaching and develop teacher professionalism. Therefore, knowing the evaluation criterion about how to become an outstanding teacher will help us learn from experience and develop appropriate evaluation criterion of outstanding teachers. At the same time, it can also help us to better improve the quality of teachers and promote the development of education in China.
This paper attempts to comprehensively analyze the evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers in the United States. The basic framework of this paper is as follows:first, bring forward the background and the basic theory, introduce the system of the content and the implementation procedure of the evaluation criterion of American accomplished teachers, and then introduce The Evaluation criterion of The English as a New Language Standards of the American Accomplished Teachers, sum up the main feature of the evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers, as well as experience and revelation. On the basis of close analysis of the evaluation criterion-in the United States, we can better understand the evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers, which can provide some experience for the evaluation criterion of our outstanding teachers.
美国是世界上制定教师评价标准比较完善的国家之一,虽然以全美专业教学标准委员会为代表的民间机构制定的优秀教师评价标准并不是官方行为,但其所带来的积极的影响却引起了广泛的关注。它不仅为教师提供了行为规范,明确优秀教师应该知道的和必须做的,而且促进了美国广大中小学教学质量的提高和教师专业化的发展。因此,了解美国优秀教师的评价标准不仅有助于我们借鉴经验,建立合理的优秀教师评价标准,而且有助于我们更好的提高师资水平,促进我国教育事业的发展。
本文的基本框架如下：首先提出选题的背景和理论依据,分析美国优秀教师评价标准的内容体系和实施程序,并在分析美国优秀英语语言教师评价标准的基础上总结出美国优秀教师评价标准的特点、经验及启示,以便于我们更好的了解美国优秀教师的评价的全过程,从而为我国的优秀教师评价标准提供一定的经验。
With the rapid development of the reform of the educational system in China, the issue about the quality of teachers has attracted more and more attention. How to improve the quality of teaching and train outstanding teachers has become the focus of the teacher education reform of China. Although China has a tradition of respect for teachers and education, there are still some problems in the aspect of selecting and evaluating the outstanding teachers. Moreover, so far China has not yet formulated a unified evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers.
The United States is one of the counties which have framed the relatively perfect evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers. Although the evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers made by the National Professional Teaching Standards Board on behalf of American unofficial organizations is nongovernmental, its positive impact has caused wide concern. It not only provides a code of conduct for teachers, clearly illuminating what a good teacher should know and how he or she should do it, but also promotes the general primary and secondary schools of the United States to improve the quality of teaching and develop teacher professionalism. Therefore, knowing the evaluation criterion about how to become an outstanding teacher will help us learn from experience and develop appropriate evaluation criterion of outstanding teachers. At the same time, it can also help us to better improve the quality of teachers and promote the development of education in China.
This paper attempts to comprehensively analyze the evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers in the United States. The basic framework of this paper is as follows:first, bring forward the background and the basic theory, introduce the system of the content and the implementation procedure of the evaluation criterion of American accomplished teachers, and then introduce The Evaluation criterion of The English as a New Language Standards of the American Accomplished Teachers, sum up the main feature of the evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers, as well as experience and revelation. On the basis of close analysis of the evaluation criterion-in the United States, we can better understand the evaluation criterion of accomplished teachers, which can provide some experience for the evaluation criterion of our outstanding teachers.
引文
①袁军,毕诚.美国职前、入职和在职教育评估体系简介[J].外国教育研究,2004,(1)：56-60.
②赵中建.美国80年代以来教师教育发展政策述评[J].全球教育展望,2001,(9)：72-78.
①王亚胜.美国优秀教师国家认证机制研究[D].南京：南京师范大学,2006,p4.
②吴姗.美国教师资格认证机构研究—美国国家专业标准委员会(NBPTS)和美国优质教师证书委员会认证制度比较(ABCTE)[D].福建：福建师范大学,2007,p6.
③张纪云.全美专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)研究[D].武汉：华中师范大学,2007,p2.
①袁锐锷,易轶.试析NBPTS优秀教师认定的标准与程序[J].外国教育研究,2004,(12)：71-75.
②曾国强.美国教师培训标准述评—美国全国专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)与美国全国教师教育资格认定委员会(NCATE)教师教育标准解析[D].北京：首都师范大学,2004,p2.
③时芸.美国全国专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)优秀教师标准探析[D].重庆：西南大学,2007,p16.
④刘惊鸿.美国“国家专业教学标准委员会”(NBPTS)音乐标准解读[D].武汉：华中师范大学,2008,p4.
⑤易凌云.美国优秀幼儿教师专业标准及其启示[J].湖南中学物理,2008,(4)：42-46.
⑥俞露.美国初中科学优秀教师新标准[J].佳木斯大学社会科学学报,2003,(6)：95-96.
⑦乐中保.美国高中优秀语文教师专业标准及启示[J].天津市教科院学报,2008,(4)：45-48.
⑧谢美彬,许明.美国高中优秀科学教师标准概述[J].教学与管理,2004,(7)：78-80.
⑨梁婧.语文教师专业素质结构研究[D].北京：首都师范大学,2003,p2.
⑩袁锐锷,易铁.美国大学以优秀教师标准重设教育硕士课程[J].学位与研究生教育,2005,(1)：58-61.
①何逢春.美国卓越教师评析[J].教师教育2005,(7)：26-27.
②赵卫菊.教师评价与教师专业发展-来自美国优秀教师评价的启示[J].淮阴学院学报,2007,(5).
③刘永芳.美国公立学校优秀教师激励体系及其评价[J].外国教育研究,2007,(2)：67-72.
④ Burrouqhs,Robert. Composing standards and composing teachers; the problem of National Board Certification[J]. Journal of teacher education,2001, (5-7):22-23.
⑤ Serafini F. Possibilities and challenges the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards[J]. Journal Of Teacher Education,2002, (10):47-50.
⑥ Montana State Board of Education. Implications of National Board Certification On The Development of Montana ducators[R].1995,(7).
① Harris DN(Harris,Douglas N),Sass TR(Sass,Tim R).The effects of NBPTS-Certified Teachers on Student Achievement[J]. Journal Of Policy Analysis And Management,2009,(28):19-21.
② Scheetz, Narici A;Martin,DavidS. Teacher Quality:a comparison of national board-certified and non-board-certified teachers of deaf students[J]. American annals of the deaf students,2006,(Spring):54-55.
③ Szpara MY,Wylie EC.NBPTS assessor training:impact of bias exercises[J].Teachers College Record,2005, (4):20-21.
①赖学军.优秀教师的科学内涵与外延[J].教育评论,2001,(4)：55-58.
②梁忠义,车文博.实用教育词典[M].吉林：吉林教育出版社,1998,p562.
③吴钢.现代教育评价教程[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2008,p4.
④俞家庆.教育管理词典(第三版)[M].海南：海南出版社,2005,p379.
①陈永明.主要发达国家教育[M].天津：天津教育出版社,2006,p32.
②吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献-美国卷(第一卷)[M].北京：人民教育出版社,2004,p345.
③赵中建.美国80年代以来教师教育发展政策述评[J].全球教育展望,2001,(9)：72-78.
④吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献-美国卷(第一卷)[M].北京：人民教育出版社,2004,p252.
⑤ Danielson,Chartote.New Trends In Teacher Evaluation[J].Educational Leadership,2001,(5):31-35.
①周南照.教师教育改革与教师专业发展：国际视野与本土实践[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社,2006,p115.
② National Education Association WEB:Confronting the Crisis:Who's Teaching Our Children?[R]. Washington, DC,1993,(11).
②吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献-美国卷(第一卷)[M].北京：人民教育出版社,2004,p214.
③周满生,诸艾晶.21世纪国家战略规划与重大政策的比较教育[J].全球教育展望,2009,(2)：40-47.
①赵康.专业、属性及判断专业成熟的六条标准——一个社会学角度分析[J].社会学角度分析,2000,(5)：30-39.
②靳玉乐.反思教学[M].四川：四川教育出版社,2006,p73.
③叶澜等.教师角色和教师发展新探[M].北京：教育科学出版社,2001,p224-226.
①梁忠义,车文博主编.适用教育辞典[M].吉林：吉林教育出版社,1998,p47.
② NBCTS/NBCTS by State[EB/OL].http://www.nbpts.org/where,2003,(8).
① English as a New Language Standards [EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org.2002. ①袁锐锷,易轶.试析NBPTS优秀教师认定的标准与程序[J].比较教育研究,2004,(12)：71-75.
① Http://www.nbpts.org.
② 2008 Guide to National Board Certification[EB/OL].http://www.nbpts.org.
①梁红京.区分性教师评价制度[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社,2005,p150.
① English as a New Language Assessment at a Glance pdf[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts org.2009.
① 2008 Guide to National Board Certification[EB/OL].http://www.nbpts.org.
① English as a New Language Assessment at a Glance.pdf [EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org.2009.
① Understanding and interpreting your scores[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org,2009.
② Understanding and interpreting your scores[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org,2009.
①王斌华.教师评价：绩效管理与教师专业发展[M].上海：上海教育出版社,2005,p101.
② Measuring What Matters:The Effects of National Board Certification on Advancing 21st Century Teaching and Teaching and Learning[EB/OL].http://www.teacherleaders.org,2006.
③ 55000 Reasons to Believe:The Impact of National Board Certification On Teacher Quality In America [EB/OL]. Http:/www.nbpts.org.
④ J.William L.Sandes,JamesJ.Ashton,S.Paul Wright.:Comparison of the Effects of NBPTS Certified Teachers With Other Teachers on the Rate of Student Academic Progress[J].Student and Analyses Requested By the NBPTS,2005,(3):30-31.
②傅松涛,刘小丽.美国NBPTS优秀教师资格认证简介[J].基础教育参考,2004,(11)：11-12.
①董奇.教育性评价[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2005,p13.
②乐中保.美国高中优秀语文教师专业标准及启示[J].天津市教科院学报,2008,(4)：45-48.
③ Goldhaber D (Goldhaber,Dan).A Descriptive Analysis Of the Distribution Of NBPTS Certified Teachers In North Carolina[J].Economics of Education Review,2006,(2):22-23.
④刘永芳.美国公立学校优秀教师激励体系及其评价[J].外国教育研究,2007,(2)：67-72.
[1][美]查洛特·丹尼尔森著,陆如萍,唐悦等译.教师评价：提高教师专业实践能力[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2005.
[2][美]查洛特·丹尼尔森著,张民选主编.教师评价-提高教师专业实践能力[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2005.
[3]陈永明.主要发达国家教育[M].天津：天津教育出版社,2006.
[4]傅道春.教师的成长与发展[M].北京：教育科学出版社,2001.
[5][美]格兰特··温吉斯著,董奇主编.教育性评价[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2005.
[6]、靳玉乐.反思教学[M].四川：四川教育出版社,2006.
[7]吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献-美国卷(第一卷)[M].北京：人民教育出版社,2004.
[8]联合国教科文组织.教育——财富蕴藏其中[M].北京:教育科学出版社,1996.
[9]梁忠义,车文博.实用教育词典[M].吉林：吉林教育出版社,1988.
[10]梁红京.区分性教师评价制度[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社,2005.
[11][美]托马斯·扎斯凯著,张民选主编.教师专业发展评价[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2006.
[12]王斌华.教师评价：绩效管理与教师专业发展[M].上海：上海教育出版社,2005.
[13]王汉澜.教育评价学[M].郑州：河南大学出版社,1995.
[14]王英杰等.美国教育[M].长春：吉林教育出版社,2000.
[15]吴钢.现代教育评价教程[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2008.
[16]叶澜等.教师角色和教师发展新探[M].北京：教育科学出版社,2001.
[17]俞家庆.教育管理词典(第三版)[M].海南出版社,2005.
[18]周南照.教师教育改革与教师专业发展：国际视野与本土实践[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社,2006.
[1]蔡敏.美国教育评价的伦理规范建设及其启示[J].外国教育研究,2005,(6)：18-21.
[2]蔡敏.美国中小学教师评价改革的有益经验分析[J].中国教育学刊,2007,(7)：65-68.
[3]谌启标.美国教师评价制度改革新进展[J].基础教育参考,2004,(9)：28-31.
[4]程红艳.美国优秀教师标准与评估[J].上海教育科研,2001,(2)：51-54.
[5]陈霞.标准本位的教师教育：内涵、特征与操作模式[J].外国中小学教育,2007,(7)：9-12.
[6]冯宏义,许明.美国基础教育数学优秀教师标准[J].教学与管理,2003,(1)：76-79.
[7]傅松涛,刘小丽.美国NBPTS优秀教师资格认证简介[J].基础教育参考,2004,(11)：11-12.
[8]何逢春.美国卓越教师评析[J].教师教育,2005,(7)：26-27.
[9]侯定凯,顾玲玲,汪婧莉.美国教师评价改革的新动向[J].全球教育展望,2005,(10)：72-75.
[10]黄哲文.全美基础教育优秀教师资格认证机制概述[J].广西教育学院学报,2006,(5)：23-26.
[11]乐中保.美国高中优秀语文教师专业标准及启示[J].天津市教科院学报,2008,(4)：45-48.
[12]乐中保.美国NBPTS优秀教师专业标准与评估[J].天津市教科院学报,2008,2008,(6)：48-52.
[13]赖学军.优秀教师的科学内涵与外延[J].教育评论,2001,(4)：55-58.
[14]李双飞,蔡敏.美国熟练教师表现性评价及其启示[J].外国教育研究,2008,(11)：81-84.
[15]李志,李政,高福霞.师生对教学质量优秀教师素质特征评价的比较研究[J].大学教育科学,2006,(2)：63-66.
[16]李旭.美国提高颁发教师资格证书的标准及其局限[J].比较教育研究,2003,(3):53-57.
[17]刘永芳.美国公立学校优秀教师激励体系及其评价[J].外国教育研究,2007,(2)：67-72.
[18]骆阳,许明.美国基础教育社会-历史优秀教师标准[J].教学与管理,2003,(2)：77-80.
[19]裴妖进.美国教师评价标准简介及对我们的启示[J].中小学教师培训；2008,(1)：57-59.
[20]王婷,孙河川.美国专业教学标准委员会教师评价指标体系简介及启示[J].理论前沿,2009,(1)：8-9.
[21]王黎明.美国国家专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)述评[J].外国教育研究,2004,(2)：6-9.
[22]王景英,梁红梅.当前美国中小学教师评价的特点及其启示[J].外国教育研究,2002,(9)：54-59.
[23]邬春芹.中美优秀教师评估标准与评估程序比较研究[J].江苏教育学报,2005(3)：5-8.
[24]吴广宇,范天森.浅析NBPTS标准对制定我国教师专业标准的启示[J].武汉大学学报,2008,(8)：94-99.
[25]谢美彬,许明.美国高中优秀科学教师标准概述[J].教学与管理,2004,(7)：78-80.
[26]徐玉珍.论“好教师——教师评价的”评价[J].课程·教材·教法,1997,(11)：45-57.
[27]姚文峰,谌启标.美国优秀教师的评选及启示[J].上海中学数学,2005,(9)：13-15.
[28]杨尊伟.美国教师教育：从“能力本位”转到“标准本位”[J].比较教育研究,2004,(1)：8-9.
[29]易凌云.美国优秀幼儿教师专业标准及其启示[J].湖南中学物理,2008,(4)：42-46.
[30]于江.简析NCLB法案对美国教师质量的政策影响[J].科教文汇,2008,(3)：121-122.
[31]俞露.美国初中科学优秀教师新标准[J].佳木斯大学社会科学学报,2003,(6)：95-96.
[32]袁军,毕诚.美国职前、入职和在职教育评估体系简介[J].外国教育研究2004,(1)56-60.
[33]袁锐锷,易轶.试析NBPTS优秀教师认定的标准与程序[J].比较教育研究,2004,(12):71-75.
[34]袁锐锷,易铁.美国大学以优秀教师标准重设教育硕士课程[J].学位与研究生教育,2005,(1)：58-61.
[35]赵康：专业、属性及判断成熟专业的六条标准—一个社会学角度的分析[J].社会学研究,2000,(5)：30-39.
[36]赵卫菊.教师评价与教师专业发展-来自美国优秀教师评价的启示[J].淮阴学院学报,2007,(5)：684-687.
[37]赵中建.美国80年代以来教师教育发展政策述评[J].全球教育展望,2001,(9)：72-78.
[38]周满生,诸艾晶.21世纪国家战略规划与重大政策的比较教育[J].全球教育展望。2009,(2):40-47.
[1]曾国强.美国教师培训标准述评—美国全国专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)与美国全国教师教育资格认定委员会(NCATE)教师教育标准解析[D].北京：首都师范大学,2004.
[2]刘惊鸿.美国“国家专业教学标准委员会”(NBPTS)音乐标准解读[D]武汉：华中师范大学,2008.
[3]梁婧.语文教师专业素质结构研究[D].北京：首都师范大学,2003.
[4]时芸.美国全国专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)优秀教师标准探析[D].重庆：西南大学,2007.
[5]王亚胜.美国优秀教师国家认证机制研究[D].南京：南京师范大学,2006.
[6]吴姗.美国教师资格认证机构研究—美国国家专业标准委员会(NBPTS)和美国优质教师证书委员会认证制度比较(ABCTE)[D].福建：福建师范大学,2007.
[7]张纪云.全美专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)研究[D].武汉：华中师范大学,2007.
[1]Baratz-snowden, Joan. Performance Assessments for Identifying Excellent Teachers: NBPTS Charts its research and Development Course[J].Journal of Personnel Evaluation In Education 1991,(10):28-29.
[2]Burrouqhs.Robert. Composing Standards and Composing Teachers; The Problem of National Board Certification[J]. Journal of teacher education,2001,(5-7):22-23.
[3]Burroughs,Robert,Roe,Tarnmy. Communities of Practices and Discourse Commun ities:Negotiating Boundaries In NBPTS Certification[R].Washington, DC,1998.
[4]Danielson,Chartote. New Trends In Teacher Evaluation [J].Educational Leadership, 2001,(5):31-35.
[5]David Lustick,Gary Sykes. Education Policy analysis archives[J]. A Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Joumal,2006,(10):20-22.
[6]Engelhard, George Jr; Myford, Carol M.Comparison of Single and Double-Assessor Scoring Designs For the Assessment Of NBPTS [J].Apply Measure; 2009,(3):40-41.
[7]2008 Guide to National Board Certification[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org.
[8]English as a New Language Standards[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org.2002.
[9]English as a New Language Assessment at a Glance. Pdf [EB/OL].Http://www. Nbpts.org.2009.
[10]Frank KA. Does NBPTS Certification Affect The Number Of Colleagues a Teacher Helps With Instruction[J].Educational Evaluation And Police Analysis,2008,(5):56-58.
[11]Gitomer,Drew H. Changes Form Performance Assessments In the NBPTS System[R].http://www.nbpts.prg.1997,(3).
[12]Goldhaber D (Goldhaber,Dan).A Descriptive Analysis Of the Distribution OfNBPTS Certified Teachers In North Carolina[J].Economics of Education Review, 2006,(2):22-23.
[13]Goldhaber D (Goldhaber, Dan), Choi HJ(Choi, Hyung-Jai), Cramer L (Cramer, Lauren). A Descriptive Analysis Of The Distribution Of NBPTS Certified Teachers In North Carolina[J]. Economics Of Education Review,2007,(4):3-5.
[14]Harris DN(Harris,Douglas N),Sass TR(Sass,Tim R).The Effects of NBPTS Certified Teachers On Student Achievement[J].Journal Of Policy Analysis And Management,2009,(28):19-21.
[15]Hidebrandt SA. Spanish Teachers'Resource Use While Attempting National Board Certification[J].A Journal Devoted To The Teaching Of Spanish And Portuguese, 2008,(1):24-25.
[16]Hertling,Lizabeth. Peer Review. Of Teacher ERIC Digest[EB/OL].Http://www.eric digests.org/1999.
[17]HollyM.Hart,StephenM.Ponisciak. Principal and Teacher Leadership in Chicago [R].Consortium On Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago,2006.
[18]JWilliam L.Sandes,JamesJ.Ashton,S.Paul Wright. Comparison of the. Effects of NBPTS Certified Teachers with Other Teachers on the Rate of Student Academic Progress[J].Student and Analyses Requested By the NBPTS,2005,(3):30-31.
[19]Lieberman,Joyce M. Promoting teacher leadership In Urban Schools [R]. Washington, DC,2002,(2).
[20]Lieberman, Joyee M. Administrative Support For Teachers Seeking National Board Certification:What, Why and How? [EB/OL].Http://www.eric.ed.gov,2002.
[21]Linquanti,Robert;Peterson, Joan. An Enormous Untapped Potential:A Study Of The Feasibility Of Using National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification To Improve Low performing Schools[J].2001,(12):12-14.
[22]Measuring What Matters:The Effects of National Board Certification on Advancing 21st Century Teaching and Teaching and Learning [EB/OL]. Http://www. teacherleaders.org,2006.
[23]Montana state Board of Education. Implications of National Board Certification On The Development of Montana Educators[R].1995,(7).
[24]National Education Association WEB:Confronting the Crisis:Who's Teaching Our Children?[R]. Washington, DC,1993,(11).
[25]NBCTS/NBCTS by State [EB/OL].Http://www. nbpts.org/where/2004, (12).
[26]Patmers In Accomplished Teaching[R].Washington,DC.2002. Arlington.
[27]Rennert-riev,Peter,The National Board As Professional Development:Technical, Practical and Emancipatory Dimensions[J].Teacher Education and Practice,2006, (5): 11-14.
[28]Scheetz,NanciA;Martin,DavidS. Teacher Quality:A Comparison Of National Board-Certified and Non-board-certified Teachers of Deaf Students[J]. American Annals Of The Deaf Students,2006, (Spring):54-55.
[29]Serafini F. Possibilities and challenges-the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards [J]. Journal Of Teacher Education,2002, (10):47-50.
[30]Sherman Dorn. National Board Certification as Professional Development:What Are Teachers Learning[J].A Peer-Reviewed scholarly journal,College of Education University of South Florida,2006,(2):27-28.
[31]Standerfer SL(Standerfer,Stephanie L).Learning From The National Board For Professional Teacher Certification In Music[R].Bulletin of The Council For Researcher In Music Education,2008,spring.
[32]Szpara MY,Wylie EC.NBPTS Assessor Training; Impact Of Bias Exercises [J]. Teachers College Record, 2005,(4):20-21.
[33]Stone,J.E. The Value-Added Achievement Gains of NBPTS-Certified Teachers In Tennessee:A Brief Report [R], Washington; DC,2002.
[34]The impact of National Board Certification on teachers National Board for Profession Teaching Standards[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org.2000.
[35]The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University, The Personnel Evaluation Standards[EB/OL]. http://www.eval.org/Evaluation Documents.2001,(7).
[36]What Teachers Should Know and be able to do? [EB/OL]. Http://www.nbpts. org. 2002,(8).
[37]Understanding and interpreting your scores[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org,2009.
[38]55000 Reasons to Believe:The Impact of National Board Certification On Teacher Quality In America[EB/OL]. http:/www.nbpts.org.
[1]美国评价协会网站http://www. eval. org/eval. org/Evaluation Documents/Perseval. html.
[2]教育资源信息摘要网站http://www. eric digests.org/1999.
[3]全美专业教学标准委员会网站http://www. nbpts. org.
[4]教育资源信息中心网站http://www. eric. ed. gov,2002.
②赵中建.美国80年代以来教师教育发展政策述评[J].全球教育展望,2001,(9)：72-78.
①王亚胜.美国优秀教师国家认证机制研究[D].南京：南京师范大学,2006,p4.
②吴姗.美国教师资格认证机构研究—美国国家专业标准委员会(NBPTS)和美国优质教师证书委员会认证制度比较(ABCTE)[D].福建：福建师范大学,2007,p6.
③张纪云.全美专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)研究[D].武汉：华中师范大学,2007,p2.
①袁锐锷,易轶.试析NBPTS优秀教师认定的标准与程序[J].外国教育研究,2004,(12)：71-75.
②曾国强.美国教师培训标准述评—美国全国专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)与美国全国教师教育资格认定委员会(NCATE)教师教育标准解析[D].北京：首都师范大学,2004,p2.
③时芸.美国全国专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)优秀教师标准探析[D].重庆：西南大学,2007,p16.
④刘惊鸿.美国“国家专业教学标准委员会”(NBPTS)音乐标准解读[D].武汉：华中师范大学,2008,p4.
⑤易凌云.美国优秀幼儿教师专业标准及其启示[J].湖南中学物理,2008,(4)：42-46.
⑥俞露.美国初中科学优秀教师新标准[J].佳木斯大学社会科学学报,2003,(6)：95-96.
⑦乐中保.美国高中优秀语文教师专业标准及启示[J].天津市教科院学报,2008,(4)：45-48.
⑧谢美彬,许明.美国高中优秀科学教师标准概述[J].教学与管理,2004,(7)：78-80.
⑨梁婧.语文教师专业素质结构研究[D].北京：首都师范大学,2003,p2.
⑩袁锐锷,易铁.美国大学以优秀教师标准重设教育硕士课程[J].学位与研究生教育,2005,(1)：58-61.
①何逢春.美国卓越教师评析[J].教师教育2005,(7)：26-27.
②赵卫菊.教师评价与教师专业发展-来自美国优秀教师评价的启示[J].淮阴学院学报,2007,(5).
③刘永芳.美国公立学校优秀教师激励体系及其评价[J].外国教育研究,2007,(2)：67-72.
④ Burrouqhs,Robert. Composing standards and composing teachers; the problem of National Board Certification[J]. Journal of teacher education,2001, (5-7):22-23.
⑤ Serafini F. Possibilities and challenges the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards[J]. Journal Of Teacher Education,2002, (10):47-50.
⑥ Montana State Board of Education. Implications of National Board Certification On The Development of Montana ducators[R].1995,(7).
① Harris DN(Harris,Douglas N),Sass TR(Sass,Tim R).The effects of NBPTS-Certified Teachers on Student Achievement[J]. Journal Of Policy Analysis And Management,2009,(28):19-21.
② Scheetz, Narici A;Martin,DavidS. Teacher Quality:a comparison of national board-certified and non-board-certified teachers of deaf students[J]. American annals of the deaf students,2006,(Spring):54-55.
③ Szpara MY,Wylie EC.NBPTS assessor training:impact of bias exercises[J].Teachers College Record,2005, (4):20-21.
①赖学军.优秀教师的科学内涵与外延[J].教育评论,2001,(4)：55-58.
②梁忠义,车文博.实用教育词典[M].吉林：吉林教育出版社,1998,p562.
③吴钢.现代教育评价教程[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2008,p4.
④俞家庆.教育管理词典(第三版)[M].海南：海南出版社,2005,p379.
①陈永明.主要发达国家教育[M].天津：天津教育出版社,2006,p32.
②吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献-美国卷(第一卷)[M].北京：人民教育出版社,2004,p345.
③赵中建.美国80年代以来教师教育发展政策述评[J].全球教育展望,2001,(9)：72-78.
④吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献-美国卷(第一卷)[M].北京：人民教育出版社,2004,p252.
⑤ Danielson,Chartote.New Trends In Teacher Evaluation[J].Educational Leadership,2001,(5):31-35.
①周南照.教师教育改革与教师专业发展：国际视野与本土实践[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社,2006,p115.
② National Education Association WEB:Confronting the Crisis:Who's Teaching Our Children?[R]. Washington, DC,1993,(11).
②吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献-美国卷(第一卷)[M].北京：人民教育出版社,2004,p214.
③周满生,诸艾晶.21世纪国家战略规划与重大政策的比较教育[J].全球教育展望,2009,(2)：40-47.
①赵康.专业、属性及判断专业成熟的六条标准——一个社会学角度分析[J].社会学角度分析,2000,(5)：30-39.
②靳玉乐.反思教学[M].四川：四川教育出版社,2006,p73.
③叶澜等.教师角色和教师发展新探[M].北京：教育科学出版社,2001,p224-226.
①梁忠义,车文博主编.适用教育辞典[M].吉林：吉林教育出版社,1998,p47.
② NBCTS/NBCTS by State[EB/OL].http://www.nbpts.org/where,2003,(8).
① English as a New Language Standards [EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org.2002. ①袁锐锷,易轶.试析NBPTS优秀教师认定的标准与程序[J].比较教育研究,2004,(12)：71-75.
① Http://www.nbpts.org.
② 2008 Guide to National Board Certification[EB/OL].http://www.nbpts.org.
①梁红京.区分性教师评价制度[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社,2005,p150.
① English as a New Language Assessment at a Glance pdf[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts org.2009.
① 2008 Guide to National Board Certification[EB/OL].http://www.nbpts.org.
① English as a New Language Assessment at a Glance.pdf [EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org.2009.
① Understanding and interpreting your scores[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org,2009.
② Understanding and interpreting your scores[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org,2009.
①王斌华.教师评价：绩效管理与教师专业发展[M].上海：上海教育出版社,2005,p101.
② Measuring What Matters:The Effects of National Board Certification on Advancing 21st Century Teaching and Teaching and Learning[EB/OL].http://www.teacherleaders.org,2006.
③ 55000 Reasons to Believe:The Impact of National Board Certification On Teacher Quality In America [EB/OL]. Http:/www.nbpts.org.
④ J.William L.Sandes,JamesJ.Ashton,S.Paul Wright.:Comparison of the Effects of NBPTS Certified Teachers With Other Teachers on the Rate of Student Academic Progress[J].Student and Analyses Requested By the NBPTS,2005,(3):30-31.
②傅松涛,刘小丽.美国NBPTS优秀教师资格认证简介[J].基础教育参考,2004,(11)：11-12.
①董奇.教育性评价[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2005,p13.
②乐中保.美国高中优秀语文教师专业标准及启示[J].天津市教科院学报,2008,(4)：45-48.
③ Goldhaber D (Goldhaber,Dan).A Descriptive Analysis Of the Distribution Of NBPTS Certified Teachers In North Carolina[J].Economics of Education Review,2006,(2):22-23.
④刘永芳.美国公立学校优秀教师激励体系及其评价[J].外国教育研究,2007,(2)：67-72.
[1][美]查洛特·丹尼尔森著,陆如萍,唐悦等译.教师评价：提高教师专业实践能力[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2005.
[2][美]查洛特·丹尼尔森著,张民选主编.教师评价-提高教师专业实践能力[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2005.
[3]陈永明.主要发达国家教育[M].天津：天津教育出版社,2006.
[4]傅道春.教师的成长与发展[M].北京：教育科学出版社,2001.
[5][美]格兰特··温吉斯著,董奇主编.教育性评价[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2005.
[6]、靳玉乐.反思教学[M].四川：四川教育出版社,2006.
[7]吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献-美国卷(第一卷)[M].北京：人民教育出版社,2004.
[8]联合国教科文组织.教育——财富蕴藏其中[M].北京:教育科学出版社,1996.
[9]梁忠义,车文博.实用教育词典[M].吉林：吉林教育出版社,1988.
[10]梁红京.区分性教师评价制度[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社,2005.
[11][美]托马斯·扎斯凯著,张民选主编.教师专业发展评价[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2006.
[12]王斌华.教师评价：绩效管理与教师专业发展[M].上海：上海教育出版社,2005.
[13]王汉澜.教育评价学[M].郑州：河南大学出版社,1995.
[14]王英杰等.美国教育[M].长春：吉林教育出版社,2000.
[15]吴钢.现代教育评价教程[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2008.
[16]叶澜等.教师角色和教师发展新探[M].北京：教育科学出版社,2001.
[17]俞家庆.教育管理词典(第三版)[M].海南出版社,2005.
[18]周南照.教师教育改革与教师专业发展：国际视野与本土实践[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社,2006.
[1]蔡敏.美国教育评价的伦理规范建设及其启示[J].外国教育研究,2005,(6)：18-21.
[2]蔡敏.美国中小学教师评价改革的有益经验分析[J].中国教育学刊,2007,(7)：65-68.
[3]谌启标.美国教师评价制度改革新进展[J].基础教育参考,2004,(9)：28-31.
[4]程红艳.美国优秀教师标准与评估[J].上海教育科研,2001,(2)：51-54.
[5]陈霞.标准本位的教师教育：内涵、特征与操作模式[J].外国中小学教育,2007,(7)：9-12.
[6]冯宏义,许明.美国基础教育数学优秀教师标准[J].教学与管理,2003,(1)：76-79.
[7]傅松涛,刘小丽.美国NBPTS优秀教师资格认证简介[J].基础教育参考,2004,(11)：11-12.
[8]何逢春.美国卓越教师评析[J].教师教育,2005,(7)：26-27.
[9]侯定凯,顾玲玲,汪婧莉.美国教师评价改革的新动向[J].全球教育展望,2005,(10)：72-75.
[10]黄哲文.全美基础教育优秀教师资格认证机制概述[J].广西教育学院学报,2006,(5)：23-26.
[11]乐中保.美国高中优秀语文教师专业标准及启示[J].天津市教科院学报,2008,(4)：45-48.
[12]乐中保.美国NBPTS优秀教师专业标准与评估[J].天津市教科院学报,2008,2008,(6)：48-52.
[13]赖学军.优秀教师的科学内涵与外延[J].教育评论,2001,(4)：55-58.
[14]李双飞,蔡敏.美国熟练教师表现性评价及其启示[J].外国教育研究,2008,(11)：81-84.
[15]李志,李政,高福霞.师生对教学质量优秀教师素质特征评价的比较研究[J].大学教育科学,2006,(2)：63-66.
[16]李旭.美国提高颁发教师资格证书的标准及其局限[J].比较教育研究,2003,(3):53-57.
[17]刘永芳.美国公立学校优秀教师激励体系及其评价[J].外国教育研究,2007,(2)：67-72.
[18]骆阳,许明.美国基础教育社会-历史优秀教师标准[J].教学与管理,2003,(2)：77-80.
[19]裴妖进.美国教师评价标准简介及对我们的启示[J].中小学教师培训；2008,(1)：57-59.
[20]王婷,孙河川.美国专业教学标准委员会教师评价指标体系简介及启示[J].理论前沿,2009,(1)：8-9.
[21]王黎明.美国国家专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)述评[J].外国教育研究,2004,(2)：6-9.
[22]王景英,梁红梅.当前美国中小学教师评价的特点及其启示[J].外国教育研究,2002,(9)：54-59.
[23]邬春芹.中美优秀教师评估标准与评估程序比较研究[J].江苏教育学报,2005(3)：5-8.
[24]吴广宇,范天森.浅析NBPTS标准对制定我国教师专业标准的启示[J].武汉大学学报,2008,(8)：94-99.
[25]谢美彬,许明.美国高中优秀科学教师标准概述[J].教学与管理,2004,(7)：78-80.
[26]徐玉珍.论“好教师——教师评价的”评价[J].课程·教材·教法,1997,(11)：45-57.
[27]姚文峰,谌启标.美国优秀教师的评选及启示[J].上海中学数学,2005,(9)：13-15.
[28]杨尊伟.美国教师教育：从“能力本位”转到“标准本位”[J].比较教育研究,2004,(1)：8-9.
[29]易凌云.美国优秀幼儿教师专业标准及其启示[J].湖南中学物理,2008,(4)：42-46.
[30]于江.简析NCLB法案对美国教师质量的政策影响[J].科教文汇,2008,(3)：121-122.
[31]俞露.美国初中科学优秀教师新标准[J].佳木斯大学社会科学学报,2003,(6)：95-96.
[32]袁军,毕诚.美国职前、入职和在职教育评估体系简介[J].外国教育研究2004,(1)56-60.
[33]袁锐锷,易轶.试析NBPTS优秀教师认定的标准与程序[J].比较教育研究,2004,(12):71-75.
[34]袁锐锷,易铁.美国大学以优秀教师标准重设教育硕士课程[J].学位与研究生教育,2005,(1)：58-61.
[35]赵康：专业、属性及判断成熟专业的六条标准—一个社会学角度的分析[J].社会学研究,2000,(5)：30-39.
[36]赵卫菊.教师评价与教师专业发展-来自美国优秀教师评价的启示[J].淮阴学院学报,2007,(5)：684-687.
[37]赵中建.美国80年代以来教师教育发展政策述评[J].全球教育展望,2001,(9)：72-78.
[38]周满生,诸艾晶.21世纪国家战略规划与重大政策的比较教育[J].全球教育展望。2009,(2):40-47.
[1]曾国强.美国教师培训标准述评—美国全国专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)与美国全国教师教育资格认定委员会(NCATE)教师教育标准解析[D].北京：首都师范大学,2004.
[2]刘惊鸿.美国“国家专业教学标准委员会”(NBPTS)音乐标准解读[D]武汉：华中师范大学,2008.
[3]梁婧.语文教师专业素质结构研究[D].北京：首都师范大学,2003.
[4]时芸.美国全国专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)优秀教师标准探析[D].重庆：西南大学,2007.
[5]王亚胜.美国优秀教师国家认证机制研究[D].南京：南京师范大学,2006.
[6]吴姗.美国教师资格认证机构研究—美国国家专业标准委员会(NBPTS)和美国优质教师证书委员会认证制度比较(ABCTE)[D].福建：福建师范大学,2007.
[7]张纪云.全美专业教学标准委员会(NBPTS)研究[D].武汉：华中师范大学,2007.
[1]Baratz-snowden, Joan. Performance Assessments for Identifying Excellent Teachers: NBPTS Charts its research and Development Course[J].Journal of Personnel Evaluation In Education 1991,(10):28-29.
[2]Burrouqhs.Robert. Composing Standards and Composing Teachers; The Problem of National Board Certification[J]. Journal of teacher education,2001,(5-7):22-23.
[3]Burroughs,Robert,Roe,Tarnmy. Communities of Practices and Discourse Commun ities:Negotiating Boundaries In NBPTS Certification[R].Washington, DC,1998.
[4]Danielson,Chartote. New Trends In Teacher Evaluation [J].Educational Leadership, 2001,(5):31-35.
[5]David Lustick,Gary Sykes. Education Policy analysis archives[J]. A Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Joumal,2006,(10):20-22.
[6]Engelhard, George Jr; Myford, Carol M.Comparison of Single and Double-Assessor Scoring Designs For the Assessment Of NBPTS [J].Apply Measure; 2009,(3):40-41.
[7]2008 Guide to National Board Certification[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org.
[8]English as a New Language Standards[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org.2002.
[9]English as a New Language Assessment at a Glance. Pdf [EB/OL].Http://www. Nbpts.org.2009.
[10]Frank KA. Does NBPTS Certification Affect The Number Of Colleagues a Teacher Helps With Instruction[J].Educational Evaluation And Police Analysis,2008,(5):56-58.
[11]Gitomer,Drew H. Changes Form Performance Assessments In the NBPTS System[R].http://www.nbpts.prg.1997,(3).
[12]Goldhaber D (Goldhaber,Dan).A Descriptive Analysis Of the Distribution OfNBPTS Certified Teachers In North Carolina[J].Economics of Education Review, 2006,(2):22-23.
[13]Goldhaber D (Goldhaber, Dan), Choi HJ(Choi, Hyung-Jai), Cramer L (Cramer, Lauren). A Descriptive Analysis Of The Distribution Of NBPTS Certified Teachers In North Carolina[J]. Economics Of Education Review,2007,(4):3-5.
[14]Harris DN(Harris,Douglas N),Sass TR(Sass,Tim R).The Effects of NBPTS Certified Teachers On Student Achievement[J].Journal Of Policy Analysis And Management,2009,(28):19-21.
[15]Hidebrandt SA. Spanish Teachers'Resource Use While Attempting National Board Certification[J].A Journal Devoted To The Teaching Of Spanish And Portuguese, 2008,(1):24-25.
[16]Hertling,Lizabeth. Peer Review. Of Teacher ERIC Digest[EB/OL].Http://www.eric digests.org/1999.
[17]HollyM.Hart,StephenM.Ponisciak. Principal and Teacher Leadership in Chicago [R].Consortium On Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago,2006.
[18]JWilliam L.Sandes,JamesJ.Ashton,S.Paul Wright. Comparison of the. Effects of NBPTS Certified Teachers with Other Teachers on the Rate of Student Academic Progress[J].Student and Analyses Requested By the NBPTS,2005,(3):30-31.
[19]Lieberman,Joyce M. Promoting teacher leadership In Urban Schools [R]. Washington, DC,2002,(2).
[20]Lieberman, Joyee M. Administrative Support For Teachers Seeking National Board Certification:What, Why and How? [EB/OL].Http://www.eric.ed.gov,2002.
[21]Linquanti,Robert;Peterson, Joan. An Enormous Untapped Potential:A Study Of The Feasibility Of Using National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification To Improve Low performing Schools[J].2001,(12):12-14.
[22]Measuring What Matters:The Effects of National Board Certification on Advancing 21st Century Teaching and Teaching and Learning [EB/OL]. Http://www. teacherleaders.org,2006.
[23]Montana state Board of Education. Implications of National Board Certification On The Development of Montana Educators[R].1995,(7).
[24]National Education Association WEB:Confronting the Crisis:Who's Teaching Our Children?[R]. Washington, DC,1993,(11).
[25]NBCTS/NBCTS by State [EB/OL].Http://www. nbpts.org/where/2004, (12).
[26]Patmers In Accomplished Teaching[R].Washington,DC.2002. Arlington.
[27]Rennert-riev,Peter,The National Board As Professional Development:Technical, Practical and Emancipatory Dimensions[J].Teacher Education and Practice,2006, (5): 11-14.
[28]Scheetz,NanciA;Martin,DavidS. Teacher Quality:A Comparison Of National Board-Certified and Non-board-certified Teachers of Deaf Students[J]. American Annals Of The Deaf Students,2006, (Spring):54-55.
[29]Serafini F. Possibilities and challenges-the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards [J]. Journal Of Teacher Education,2002, (10):47-50.
[30]Sherman Dorn. National Board Certification as Professional Development:What Are Teachers Learning[J].A Peer-Reviewed scholarly journal,College of Education University of South Florida,2006,(2):27-28.
[31]Standerfer SL(Standerfer,Stephanie L).Learning From The National Board For Professional Teacher Certification In Music[R].Bulletin of The Council For Researcher In Music Education,2008,spring.
[32]Szpara MY,Wylie EC.NBPTS Assessor Training; Impact Of Bias Exercises [J]. Teachers College Record, 2005,(4):20-21.
[33]Stone,J.E. The Value-Added Achievement Gains of NBPTS-Certified Teachers In Tennessee:A Brief Report [R], Washington; DC,2002.
[34]The impact of National Board Certification on teachers National Board for Profession Teaching Standards[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org.2000.
[35]The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University, The Personnel Evaluation Standards[EB/OL]. http://www.eval.org/Evaluation Documents.2001,(7).
[36]What Teachers Should Know and be able to do? [EB/OL]. Http://www.nbpts. org. 2002,(8).
[37]Understanding and interpreting your scores[EB/OL].Http://www.nbpts.org,2009.
[38]55000 Reasons to Believe:The Impact of National Board Certification On Teacher Quality In America[EB/OL]. http:/www.nbpts.org.
[1]美国评价协会网站http://www. eval. org/eval. org/Evaluation Documents/Perseval. html.
[2]教育资源信息摘要网站http://www. eric digests.org/1999.
[3]全美专业教学标准委员会网站http://www. nbpts. org.
[4]教育资源信息中心网站http://www. eric. ed. gov,2002.