苦荞资源遗传多样性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
苦荞是我国特有的药食同源作物,其营养价值高,富含生物类黄酮等生物活性成分,具有营养和保健的双重功效。其特有的营养组成、功能价值及地域资源特点对满足市场需求,改善人们膳食结构具有重要作用。随着人们健康意识的提高,苦荞已成为人们研究和关注的焦点。但是,苦荞属小宗作物,研究基础薄弱,当前生产利用品种存在着产量偏低、品种更换缓慢、品种应用原始单一、退化严重等一系列问题。因此,开展苦荞资源的遗传多样性研究对筛选优异种质资源,改良苦荞品种重要的指导意义。
     本研究利用简单重复序列(SSR)的分子标记方法,结合形态学分析方法,对来自四川、云南、贵州、西藏、陕西、宁夏等地的205份苦荞地方品种进行遗传多样性分析,研究得出如下重要结果:
     (1)农艺性状分析结果表明,205份供试材料之间差异明显。不同材料在生育期、株高、主茎分枝数、主茎节数、叶长、叶宽、主茎粗、千粒重等8个数量性状上存在差异,表现出明显的多样性。形态性状变异系数(CV%)最大的是主茎粗,达到了35.26%;其次是主茎分枝,变异系数(CV%)为23.24%,变异系数(CV%)最小的是生育期只有11.29%。通过聚类将所有苦荞地方种质资源分为四个大类,各大类之间农艺性状均值和变异系数也存在着一定的差异,但材料之间的地域性差异不明显,这可能与农艺性状受环境影响较大有关,表明每个省区的苦荞资源具有较高的遗传多样性。
     (2)通过PCR扩增对30个甜荞引物和苦荞引物进行筛选,筛选出多态性比率较高的13个引物:Fes1394、Fes1816、Fes2644、Fes1286、Fes1475、Fes2743、Hyb-49、Hyb-16、Hyb-15、TH3A-GT16、TH3A-CA7、SE13-GT11、TH26-CA49,并应用于本次苦荞资源遗传多样性研究。
     (3)SSR分子标记结果可以看出,所有陕西品种遗传相似系数在0.57-0.94之间,平均值为0.76;西藏的在0.65-0.93之间,平均值为0.79;云贵川地区的为0.56-0.95之间,平均值为0.76。聚类结果表明,同一地区的品种首先聚在一起。对所有供试的苦荞进行遗传多样性分析表明,205份材料的遗传相似系数变幅为0.55-0.95,平均值为0.75,品种间具有较高的遗传多样性。通过聚类将所有供试材料分为15大类,大部分材料以较多数量组成一类,其遗传距离较近,而另外一些个别材料以极少数成一类甚至单个品种成一大类,表明遗传差异较大。
     (4)通过聚类结果发现,来源于陕西省宁陕的材料K047和来自云南的材料K176,独立于聚类主群体之外,单个品种成一大类。这些说明它们是较为特殊的苦荞遗传资源。进一步分析发现K047生育日数比同一地区其它品种较长,株高较低;K176生育日数比同一地区其它品种较长,千粒重较高。今后的利用当中应关注这些较特殊,且特点鲜明的品种。
Buckwheat is the important food crops and cash crops,and it also has a high nutritional value,being rich in bioflavonoids and other bioactive components and having the dual effect of nutrition and health. It is not only a honey crop,but also a traditional export commodity in china. Its unique nutritional composition,functional value and role of agricultural production play an important role to meet the current needs of people. Buckwheat has become the focus of attention,as the research of its medicinal value developments to a deeper level. The beginning study of Buckwheat is late and the progress is slow, and there is a series of serious problems exists,such as:low use of varieties,species changes slowly,the original application of a single species,serious degradation. Therefore,researches on the genetic diversity of buckwheat have an important guiding significance on screening of germplasm and improving varieties of buckwheat. In this study,by SSR molecular markers and morphological analysis, we compared the genetic polymorphisms of 205 Tartary Buckwheat Local varieties coming from Sichuan,Yunnan,Guizhou,Xizang,Shan’anxi and Ningxia. The main results are as follows:
     1. The analysis of Agronomic traits indicated that: there is significant difference between all the 205 accesses. There is obvious diversity on eight Quantitative traits between all the materials. The max of Coefficient of variation of morphological traits ( CV%) is the diameter of Main stem with reaching 35.26%;Secondly is the branch of the stem with the number of 23.24%; while the growth period ranks the last reaching 11.29%. Results from Clustering showing that:all the materials can be divided into four major categories,which contains 12 sub-categories. Overall, there are obvious differences on quantitative trait between categories, but no obvious regional. Varieties of the same province had been divided into different categories showing that buckwheat from all the provinces have high genetic diversity.
     2. There are 13 primers : Fes1394、Fes1816、Fes2644、Fes1286、Fes1475、Fes2743、Hyb-49、Hyb-16、Hyb-15、TH3A-GT16、TH3A-CA7、SE13-GT11、TH26-CA49 elected for the researching on genetic diversity of tartary buckwheat by PCR amplification, the 13 primers was choosed from 30 primers used on common buckwheat and tartary buckwheat.
     3. The results of SSR. Analysis of genetic diversity within the same province showed that:Genetic similarity coefficient of Shananxi varieties ranged from 0.57 to 0.94, while Xizang is 0.65-0.93,and Yunnan,Guizhou,Sichuan region ranks from 0.56 to 0.95. results of clustering show that varieties of the same area always can be divided into the same categories.There is higher genetic diversity among Varieties, and the genetic similarity coefficient of all the 502 accesses ranged from 0.55 to 0.95,with an Average of 0.75. All the tested material is divided into 15 categories by clustering,most of the material form a class with a greater number showing that they have a small genetic difference,while little material even only one material form a class showing that they have a large genetic difference.
     4. Results from Clustering showing that a single species can be divided into a category, such as the material K047 coming from Ningshan of Shananxi Province and K176 coming from Yunnan Province. These indicated that they are maybe the special buckwheat genetic resources. Further analysis showed that K047 have a longer fertility days and a lower height than the other varieties in the same area, while K176 have a longer fertility days and a higher grain weight than the other varieties in the same area. In the future, we should pay more attention to these species with specific and distinctive characteristics.
引文
包塔娜,彭树林,周正质. 2003.苦荞粉的化学成分.天然产物研究与开发,15(1):24~26
    包塔娜,周正质,张帆.2003.苦荞麦麸皮的化学成分.天然产物研究与开发,15(2):116~117
    毕春侠,郭军战,张懿藻. 1998.油松天然群体醋酶同工酶的变异分析.西北林学院学报,13(4):39~43
    柴岩,万富世. 2007.中国小杂粮产业发展报告.北京:中国农业科学技术出版社:20~21
    柴岩. 1989.荞麦的营养成分与营养价值.中国荞麦科学研究论文集.北京:学术期刊出版社:198~202
    陈灵芝. 1994.生物多样性保护现状及对策—多样性研究的原理与方法.北京:中国科学技术出版社
    陈庆富. 2001.五个中国荞麦种的核型分析.广西植物,(2):107~110
    陈荣江,王莹. 1998.大豆农艺性状的因子分析及品种的聚类分析.河南职技师范学报,26(2):20~24
    陈志坚. 1999.甘蔗杂交后代锤度的选择.福建省农科院学报,20(2):129~133
    董攀,李伟,郑有良. 2007.波兰小麦主要农艺性状分析.麦类作物学报,27(2):216~222
    杜幸,陈敏燕,刘鹏,徐根娣. 2005.两个荞麦品种的核型分析.亚热带植物科学34(2):36~38
    樊冬丽,牛西午,马小军,肖小河,鄢丹,廖庆文. 2006.苦叶七种质资源的随机扩增多态性分析.时珍国医国药,17(12):247l~2473
    高洪君,侯旭光,李丹,刘学工. 1994.六种荞麦过氧化物酶同工酶研究初报.哲里木畜牧学院学报,4(2):53~56
    高三基,陈如凯,张华,徐良年,邓祖湖,罗俊. 2006.甘蔗经济性状的因子分析及品种聚类分析.福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),35(2):113~116
    高三基,傅华英,陈如凯,徐良年,张华. 2006.甘蔗品质指标的通径分析和因子分析.植物遗传资源学报,7(1):81~84
    龚宁,陈庆富,李昌梅,张以忠. 2006.几种荞麦的抗氧化酶活性研究.广西植物,26(1):88~91
    苟小锋,曹炜,索志荣. 2004.荞麦蜜酚酸含量的高效液相色谱测定及其抗氧化作用的研究.食品科学,25(10):254~257
    顾尧臣. 1999.小宗粮食加工(四)—荞麦加工.粮食与饲料工业,7:19~22,26
    韩淑英,陈晓玉,王志路,刘淑梅,朱丽莎,储金秀,辛念. 2004.荞麦花总黄酮对体内外蛋白质非酶糖基化的抑制作用.中国药理学通报,20(11):1242~1244
    胡能书,万国贤.同工酶技术及应用.湖南科技出版社,1985
    胡守荣,夏铭,郭长英,陆晓春. 2001.林木遗传多样性研究方法概况.东北林业大学学报,29(3):72~75
    胡志昂. 1994.研究遗传多样性的基本原理和方法.生物多样性研究的原理与方法.北京:中国科技出版社,117~122
    蒋俊芳. 1991.四川大凉山地区是苦荞起源地之一.荞麦动态,(1):2~3
    康立宁,魏益民,欧阳韶辉,张国权. 2004.小麦品种品质性状的基因型因子分析.西北植物学报,24(1):120~124
    兰保祥,李立会,王辉. 2005.蒙古冰草居群遗传多样性研究.中国农业科学,38(3):468~473
    李丹. 2001.苦荞麦加工与利用研究. [硕士学位论文].无锡:无锡轻工业大学
    李景欣,云锦凤,鲁洪艳,李国瑞. 2005.野生冰草种质资源同工酶遗传多样性分析与评价.中国草地,27(6):34~38
    李萍,李毅. 2006.青海云衫遗传结构研究.甘肃农业大学学报,40(3):363~36
    李瑞国,高冬丽,柴岩,胡银岗,高金锋,安守强. 2007.苦荞资源农艺性状因子聚类分析.干旱地区农业研究,11:80~84
    李瑞国. 2007.藏陕云贵川五省区苦荞资源遗传多样性研究. [硕士学位论文].杨凌:西北农林科技大学
    李淑久,张惠珍,袁庆军. 1992.四种荞麦生殖器官的形态学研究.贵州农业科学,(6):32~36
    李文英,顾万春. 2003.蒙古栋天然群体等位酶遗传多样性研究.林业科学研究,16(3):269~276
    林汝法,柴岩,廖琴,孙世贤. 2002.中国小杂粮.北京:中国农业科学技术出版社:44~45,51~54
    林汝法,柴岩. 1994.中国荞麦.北京:中国农业出版社
    林汝法. 1985.关于荞麦品种资源的研究和利用.荞麦动态,(1):6~13
    马克平. 1993.试论生物多样性的概念.生物多样性,1(1):20~22
    莫日更朝格图,王鹏科,高金峰,高小丽,柴岩. 2010.苦荞地方种质资源的遗传多样性分析.西北植物学报. 30(2):255~261
    牟云官,曲泽洲,孙云蔚. 1990.果树种类论.北京:农业出版社:244~253
    彭锁堂,李炳林,武虹生. 1998.陆地棉不同器官同工酶特异性的研究.山西农业大学学报,18(4):319~321
    钱迎倩,马克平. 1994.生物多样性研究的原理与方法.北京:中国科学技术出版社
    任爱霞,胡家恕. 2002.棉花黄萎病与过氧化物酶同工酶分析.棉花学报,14(5):273~276
    沈镝,朱德蔚,李锡香. 2004.用5种同工酶分析云南芋种质资源的遗传多样性.植物遗传资源学报,5(3):239~246
    沈浩,刘登义. 2001.遗传多样性概述.生物学杂志,18(3):5~9
    施立明. 1990.遗传多样性及其保护.生物科学信息,2:158~164
    史通麟. 2007.苦荞SSR引物开发及其应用的研究. [硕士学位论文].太原:山西大学
    谭萍,王玉株,李红宁. 2006.十种栽培苦荞麦的随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)研究.种子,25(7):46~49
    汤圣祥,魏兴华,江云珠,余汉勇,王一平,袁筱萍. 2005.中国台湾栽培稻种质资源的等位酶遗传多样性.中国农业科学,38(3):433~438
    唐国顺,毛建昌. 1996.大巴山区荞麦种质资源主要农艺性状与单株产量的通径分析.陕西农业科学,(4):10~11
    唐启义,冯明光. 2002.实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统.北京:科学出版社
    唐荣华,张君诚,吴为人. 2002. SSR分子标记的开发技术研究进展.西南农业学报,15(4):106~109
    童红莉,田亚平,汪德清,董振南,邓心新. 2006.苦荞壳提取物对大鼠血脂的调节作用.第四军医大学学报,27(2):120~122
    涂金星. 2001.傅延栋甘蓝型油菜几个苗期形态标记的遗传.华中农业大学学报,20(4):318~320
    王伯荪,彭少麟. 1997.植被生态学—群落与生态系统.北京:中国环境科学技术出版社:78
    王洪新,胡志昂. 1994.植物繁育系统、遗传结构和遗传多样性的保护.北京:中国科学技术出版社:13~16
    王健胜,柴岩,赵喜特,吉万全. 2005.中国荞麦栽培品种的核型比较分析.西北植物学报,25(6):1114~1117
    王莉花,殷富有,刘继梅,叶昌荣. 2004.利用RAPD分析云南野生荞麦资源的多样性和亲缘关系.荞麦动态,(2):10~12
    王志林,赵树进,吴新荣. 2001.分子标记技术及其进展.生命的化学,21(1):39~42
    王忠景. 2009.甜荞资源遗传多样性研究. [硕士学位论文].杨凌:西北农林科技大学
    王转花,马文丽. 1998.荞麦同工酶多态分析.山西农业科学,26(2):24~26
    魏益民,张国权,胡新中,欧阳韶晖. 2000.荞麦蛋白质组分中氨基酸和矿物质研究.中国农业科学,33(6):101~103
    夏铭. 1999.遗传多样性研究进展.生态学杂志,18(3):59~65
    相宁,洪焰. 2000.扩增片段长度多态性技术及其在植物研究中的应用.植物生理学通讯,36(3):236~240
    熊立仲,王石平,刘克德,戴先凯, M. A. Saghai Maroof,胡锦国,张启发. 1998.微卫星和AFLP标记在水稻分子标记连锁图上的分布.植物学报,40(7):605~614
    熊丽娟,李伟,郑有良. 2006.马卡小麦主要农艺性状分析.中国农学通报,22(11):118~122
    徐宝才,肖刚,丁霄霖. 2003.色谱法分析检测苦荞籽粒中的可溶性糖(醇).色谱,21(4):410~413
    徐宝才,肖刚,丁肖霖. 2002.苦荞中酚酸和原花色素的分析测定.食品与发酵工业,28(12):32~35
    徐莉,赵桂仿. 2002.微卫星DNA标记技术及其在遗传多样性研究中的应用.西北植物学报,22(3):714~722
    殷延勃,马洪文,荣韫琛,梁爱珍. 1999.宁夏水稻主要农艺和品质性状的因子分析.西北农业大学学报,27(2):38~42
    张海英,许勇,王永健. 2001.分子标记技术概述(上) .长江蔬菜,(2):4~6
    张汉尧,刘小珍,孙茂胜,杨宇明. 2005.竹子形态标记聚类分析研究.竹子研究汇刊,24(1):25~28
    张宏志,管正学,刘湘元,刘玉红. 2000.甜荞和苦荞染色体核型分析.内蒙古农业大学学报,21(1):69~74
    张礼凤,李伟,王彩洁,徐冉,戴海英. 2006.山东大豆种质资源形态多样性分析.植物遗传资源学报,7 (4):450~454
    张以忠,陈庆富. 2008.荞麦属种质资源发芽种子过氧化物酶同工酶研究.广西植物,28(4):553~557
    张耘,刘占和,王斌. 2007.榆林小杂粮.北京:中国农业科学技术出版社:9~20
    赵丽娟,张宗文,黎裕,王天宇. 2006.苦荞种质资源遗传多样性的ISSR分析.植物遗传资源学报,7(2):159~164
    赵丽娟. 2006.荞麦种质资源遗传多样性分析. [硕士学位论文].北京:中国农业科学院
    赵明和,何玲玲,李慧娟. 1995.鞑靼荞食用药用研究.粮食与油脂,(4):4~7
    赵佐成,周明德,王中仁,侯鑫. 2002.中国苦荞麦及其近缘种的遗传多样性研究.遗传学报,29(8):723~734
    周建云,郭战军,杨祖山,张文辉. 2003.栓皮栎天然群体过氧化物酶同工酶遗传变异分析.西北林学院学报,18(2):33~36
    周以飞. 2005.不同生境下菜用大豆产量和品质性状的因子分析.福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),34(3):282~285
    邹学校,马艳青,戴雄泽,张竹青,刘荣云,陈文超,周群初,李雪峰. 2005.湖南辣椒地方品种资源的因子分析及数量分类.植物遗传资源学报,6(1):37~42
    Allard R W. 1968. The genetics of inbreeding population. Adv.Genet,14: 55~131
    B.G.Murray,B.J. Davies. 1996. An improved method for preparing the chromosomes of Pines and other gymnosperms. Biotech Histochem,3: 115~117
    Barbier E B,Burgess J C,Folke C. 1994. Paradis lost London: Earthscan Publications Ltd,Coyne J A.Ernst Mayr and oringin of species. Evolution,48: 19~30
    Bojka Kump,Branka Javornik. 2002. Genetic diversity and relationships among cultivated and wild accessions of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) asrevealed by RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution,49: 565-572
    Brooks B A,Leverich W J, Rogstad S H. 1991. Comparisons of methods for assessing genetic variation in plant conservation biology. Genetic and Conservation of Rare Plants,123~134
    CaetanoAnolles,Brant J.Bassam,Peter M.Gresshoff. 1991. DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary oligonucleotide Primers. Bio.Technology,(9) : 553~557
    Campbell CG. 1976. Buckwheat.In:Simmonds NW(ed.) Evolution of crop plants. Longman,London, 235~237
    D.J.Perry,J.Bousquet. 1998. SequenceTaggedSite (STS) Markers of Arbitrary Genes: development,characterization and analysis of linkage in black spruce. Genetics,149(2) : 1089~1098
    Deschner E E,Ruperto J,Wang G. 1991. Quercetin and Rutin as inhibitors of Azoxymethanol Induce Canonic Neoclassic.Carcinogenesis,12(7) : 1193
    Durkee A B. 1977. Polyphones of the branaleuronic fraction of buckwheat seed (Fagopyrum sagitatum Gilib). Agric Food Chem,25(2) : 286~287
    E. Zietkiew,A. Rafalske. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR) anchored polymerase chain reaction amp lication. Genome,20: 178~183
    Hughes JM,Mather PB,Mcdonald J. 1992. Differention between sunflower and sorghum cultivars using cellose elecrtrophoresis. Seed Science & technology,20: 15 ~22
    I.Paran,R.W.Michelmore. 1993. Development of reliable PCRbased markers linked to downy mildew resistance genes in lettuce. Theor Appl Genet,85: 985~993
    J. Welsh,M. Mcclelland. 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucl. Acid Res,18: 7213~7218
    J.K.Williams,A.R.Kubelik,K.J.Livak. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as markers. Nucleic Acid Res,18: 6531~6535
    KojiTsuji,OhmiOhnishi. 2000. Origin of cultivated Tatary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) revealed by RAPD analyses. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution,47: 431-438
    KojiTsuji,OhmiOhnishi. 2001. Phylogenetic position of east Tibetan natural populations in Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrumtataricum Gaert.) revealed by RAPD analyses. Genetic Resourcesand Crop Evolution,48: 63-67
    Konishi T,Iwata H,Yasui Y , Kazutoshi Yashiro, Yoshihiko Tsumura, Ryo Ohsawa, Yasuo Yasui1, Ohmi Ohnishi1. 2004. Development of microsatellite markers for common buckwheat. Proc.9th Intl. Symp. Buckwheat at Prague,Czech Republic,212-218
    Kreft S,M.Knapp and I.Kreft. 1999. Extraction of rutin from buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) seeds and determination by capillary electrophresis. J.Agr.Food Chem,47: 4649~4652
    Lee H.B,S.L. Kim and C.H. Park. 2001. Productivity of whole plant and rutin content under the different quality of light in buckwheat.Proceeding of the 8th international symposium on buckwheat. b: 84~89
    Litt,M.,Luty J. A. 1989. A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle ActingeneAm. J.Hum. Genet,44: 397~401
    M.Zabeau and P.Vos. 1993. Selective restriction fragment amplification: A general method forDNA.fingerprinting. European Patent Application,381
    Malgorzata Gawel,Iwona Wi?niewska,Andrzej Rafalski. 2002. SemiSpecific PCR for The Evaluation of Diversity Among Cultivars of Wheat and Triticale. Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters,7: 577 ~582
    Morishita T,K.Ishiguro and T.Sato. 1998. Use of nuclear magnetic resource method for detection of rutindegrading enzyme activity in Fagopyrum esculentum and F.tataricum. Breeding Science,48: 17~21
    N.R.Apuya, B.L.Frazier,P.Keim,E.Jill Roth,K.G.Lark. 1988. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms as genetic markers in soybean,Glycine max(L.)Merrill. Theor Appl Genet,75: 889~901
    P.J.Maughan,M.A.SMaroof, GR. 1996. Buss. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) insoybean:species diversity, inheritance,nearisogeniclineanalysis. Theor Appl Genet,93: 392~401
    P.K.Vos,Rene Hogers, Marjo Bleeker, Martin Reijans, Theo van de Lee, Miranda Hornes, Adrie Friters, Jerina Pot, Johan Paleman, Martin Kuiper and Marc Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acid Res,23(21) : 4407~4414
    P.Keim,J.M.Schupp,S.E.Travis,Travis, Kathryn Clayton, Tong Zhu, Liang Shi, Arnaldo Ferreira and David M. Webb. 1997. A highdensity soybean genetic map based on AFLP markers. Crop Sci,37: 537~543
    P.Keim,R.C. Shoemaker,R.G Palmer. 1989. Restriction fragment length polymorphism diversity in soybean.Theor.Appl.Genet,77: 786~792
    QingFu Chen , Sai L.K.Hsam , Friedrich J.Zeller. 2004. Cytogenntical Studies on Diploid and Autoteteraploid Common Buckwheat and the Production of Autotriploid and Trisomic Lines. Proceeding of the 9th international symposium on buckwheat,381~389
    QingFu Chen. 2001. Discussion on the origin of cultivated Buckwheat in Genus Fagopyrum. Advances in Buckwheat Research,206~213
    Quemener B.Brillouet J M. 1983. Ciceritol a pinitol digalactoside from seeds of chickpea,lentil and white lupin.Phytochemistry,22: 1745~1751
    Ringer R,Michaelis A,Green M. 1991. Glossary of genetics (Fifth edition). Springer Vedag,Getman,209
    Samimy C. 1991. Barrier to interspecific crossing of Fagopyrum esculentum with F.tataricum. I.Site of pollen tube arrestⅡ. Organogenesis from immature embryos of F.tataricum.Euphytica,54: 215~219
    Solos P. S. and D. E. Solos. 1991. Genetic variation in endemic and widespread plant species: examples from Saxifragaceae and Polystichum. Aliso,13: 215~223
    Spites E B. 1989. Genes on population. New York:john Wiley & Sons,773~774
    Sung Kook Kin,Byung han Choi,Gui Moon. 2001. Differential crosscompatibility Lines Develop in Korea. Advances in Buckwheat Research,431~435
    Tautz D,Trick M, Dover G A. 1986. Cryptic simplicity in DNA is a major source of genetic variation. Nature,322: 652~656
    T.R.Sharma,S.Jana. 2002. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) variation in Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn. accessions from China and the Himalayan region.Euphytica,127: 327-333
    Tsuji,K.and O,Ohnishi. 2000. Origin of cultivated Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaert) revealed by RAPD analyses. Genetic Resources and Crop volution,47: 431~438
    Tsuji,K. and O.Ohnishi. 2001. Phylogentic relationships among wild and cultivated Tartary buckwheat(Fagopyrum tataricum Gaert.) population revealed by AFLP analyses. Genes and Genetic systerms,76: 47~52
    V.Dvoracek,P.Cepkova,A.Michalova. 2004. Seed storage protein polymorphism of buckwheat varieties (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench、Fagopyrum tataricum L.) . Proceeding of the 9th international symposium on buckwheat: 412~418
    W.M.Powell,M.Morgante,Chaz Andre, Michael Hanafey,Julie Vogel, Scott Tingey and Antoni Rafalski . 1996. The comparison of RFLP,RAPD,AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Molecular Breeding,2: 225~238
    Weining,S and Henry R. 1994. Polymorphisms in amy1 gene of wild and cultivated barley revealed by the polymerase chain reaction. Theoretical and Applied Genetics,89: 509~513
    Xiong Zhang,Yan Chai,Bin Wang ect. 1992. A study on protein properties of buckwheat seed. Proceeding of the 5th Int symp on buckwheat. TaiYuan, China. August 20(26): 100~105.
    Zhanaeva,T.A. 1998. Tissuespecific distribution of rutin and rutindegrading enzyme in buckwheat leaves. Russ.J.Plant Physiology, 45: 63~66

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700