基于经理管理防御的企业过度投资行为研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
投资决策作为公司成长的主要动因和未来现金流量增长的重要基础,影响着公司的经营风险、盈利水平以及资本市场对其经营业绩和发展前景的评价,因此一直受到财务学家、经济学家和实业界的普遍关注。而决策过程的复杂性及影响因素的多重性,使得大量企业面临过度投资问题,严重损害企业价值,阻碍企业的发展。一般而言投资决策的形成与投资决策者的动机有密切联系,甚至是决定因素。而在我国所有权缺位的情况下,经理层拥有企业的各种决策权,因此本文从经理管理防御角度,采用理论和实证相结合的方法,试图找出我国公司过度投资行为背后的原因,为防范和减少这种非效率投资行为提供理论依据,并提出相应对策和建议。
     本文在系统回顾经理管理防御与企业过度投资理论基础上,分析经理管理防御形成的原因以及其对企业过度投资的影响,并由此提出本文的研究假说:具有管理防御动机的经理人,在制定投资项目时会更多选择过度投资进行防御,以稳定其职位。随后通过建模分析以及实验研究方法对此研究假说进行验证,研究结果表明:(1)由于两权分离且我国企业所有权缺位的原因,使得经理人掌握着企业的经营决策权,成为投资决策的控制者,因此经理人在内部、外部威胁和压力下,会选择有利于维护自身职位并使得自身效用最大化的行为;(2)建模分析表明,由于信息不对称性以及防御的存在,那么拥有控制决策权的经理人会从自身效益最大化角度考虑各种投资决策,从而产生过度投资现象,且实验研究对此进行了很好的验证;(3)设置合理的惩罚机制和激励机制可以使经理人从风险收益角度权衡得失,从而在一定程度上降低经理管理防御;(4)经理管理防御测度在一定程度上可以利用经理人能力和转换成本代替,克服了管理防御测度困难的问题。
     因此,为了降低经理人管理防御水平,提高企业经营效率,增加企业价值,企业可以从以下几个方面着手:完善企业的投资决策治理机制;对经理人实施激励和监督并重;完善经理人选拨机制。
Investment decision, the main cause for corporation development, the crucial base for future cash-flow increase, influences the managerial risk, profit level, capital market's evaluation of company's management achievements and development prospect, so it gets the attention from financial expert, economist and entrepreneur. Owing to the complexity of decision-making process and the multiplicity of influencing factors, over-investment is generated, badly damaging company's value and hinders company's development. Generally, there is a close relation between the formulation of investment decision and the decision maker, with the latter as the determinant of the former sometimes.And as of the absence of the ownership in our enterprises,the manager hold the power of the business. Therefore, from the angle of managerial entrenchment and by means of combining theory and empirical study, this dissertation attempts to find out the motive of the Chinese companies'over-investment, provide theoretical basis for preventing and decreasing ineffectiveinvestment and advance corresponding suggestions and strategies.
     On the base of recalling the managerial entrenchment and the corporate over-investment theory, we analyze the formation of managerial entrenchment and its impact on the effects of over-investment, and put foword the hypothsis:that is the managers who have the managerial entrenchment, will more choice for over-investment in the formulation of investment projects, in order to stabiliza their jobs. The next we adopt the modeling analysis and academic experiment to verify the hypothesis of this study. The result of this research shows that:(1)Because of the separation of powers and the absence of the ownership in our enterprises, managers hold the power of the business decision-making and act as an control of the investment decision-making, the managers in the internal and external threats and pressures, will choose the behavior to safeguard their jobs and to make their own utility maximization; (2)Modeling analysis shows that, as a result of information asymmetry, as well as the existence of entrenchment, the managers who have the power of the decision-making will make decisions to maximiza their own benefits, thereby creating the phenomenon of over-investment, and academic experiment have had s very good tests to this; (3) To some extent, setting reasonable punishment mechanism and incentive mechanism can reduce the managerial entrenchment, because they will more trade-off gains and losses from the perspective of risk-benefit; (4) To some extent, managerial entrenchment can use the manager's ability and relocation cost to instead, in order to overcome the difficult of the measure of managerial entrenchment.
     So, in order to reduce the level of managerial entrenchment, improve business efficiency, increase corporate value, companies can proceed from the following aspects:to improve the investment decision-making mechanisms of governance gradually; to incentive and supervise the managers; to improve the manager's selection mechanism.
引文
[1]Berle, A.A.,G.C. Means. The Modern Corporation and Priate Property [M]. New York, MacMillan Co,1932
    [2]李秉祥,薛思珊.经理管理防御与企业投资行为研究:述评与展望[J].当代经济管理,2007,12:14-18
    [3]Jensen, M.C.,W. H. Meckling. Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1976,3:305-360
    [4]Grossman,S., Hart,O.. Corporate Financial Structure and managerial Incentives, In:J. J. Mccall (ed.), The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, University of Chicago Press,1982:
    [5]Jensen, M. C. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corparate Finance and Takeovers [J]. American Economic Review,1986,76:323-329
    [6]Stulz, R. M. Managerial Discretion and Optimal Captial Structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1990,26:3-27
    [7]Hart,O., Moore, J. Debt and Security:An Analysis of the Role of Hard Claims in Constraining Management [J], American Economic Review,1995,85(3):567-585
    [8]Fama E., Jensen, M. Separation of ownership and control [J]. Journal of law and economics,1983,11 (26),301-325
    [9]Morck,R., A.Shleifer and Vishny. Management ownership and market valuation an empirical analysis [J]. Journal of financial economics,1988,20:293-315
    [10]Short, H. K. Keasey. Managerial Ownership and the Performance of Firms:Evidence form the UK [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,1999,5(1):79-101
    [11]Miguel, A., J. Pindado, C. Torre. Ownership Structure and Firm Value:New Evidence form the Spanish Corporate Governance System. Working Paper[J], Journal of Corporate Finance,2001
    [12]Fama,E.F. and M.C. Miller. Spearation of Ownership and Control[J]. Journal of Law and Economics,1972,88(2):301-325
    [13]Novaes.W,Zingales.L.Capital structure choice when managers are in control:entrenchment versus efficiency[Z],1995:
    [14]Jensen,M.C., R.S.Ruback, The market for corporate control[J]. Journal of financial economics,1983,11:5-50
    [15]Gilson S.C.Management Turnover and Financial Distress[J]. Journal of Financial Economy,1989, 5:241-262
    [16]Novaes,Waltet, and Zingales, Capital structure choice when managers are in control:Entrenchment versus efficiency, Working paper[J], Journal of Financial Economy,1995:
    [17]Jumg, Kim, Stulz. Managerial Entrenchment and Payout policy[J]. Journal of financial quantitative Analysis,1996,39(4):759-790
    [18]Abe de Jong, Chris Veld. M Empirical Analysis of Intremental Capital Structure Decisions Under Managerial Entrenchment [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance,2001,25(10):1857-1895
    [19]Cha-chung Chan, Victor W. Liu and Chun-shun Wu. Managerial Entrenchment and Financing Decision [J]. Journal of Management and Systems,1998,1:41-62
    [20]Berger., P.G., E.Ofek and D.L. Yewnack.. Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure Decisions [J]. Journal of Finance,1997,50:1411-1438
    [21]Stulz, R.. Managerial Control of Voting Rights:Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control [J]. Journal of Financial Economics.1988,20:25-54
    [22]Harris, M. and Raviv,A.. Corporate Control Contests and Capital Structure [J].lournal of Financial Economics,1988,20:55-86
    [23]Israel, R.. Capital Structure and the Market for Corporate Control, The Role of Debt Financing [J]. Journal of Finance,1991,46:1391-1409
    [24]Zwiebel, Jeff. Dynamic Capital Structure Under Managerial Entrenchment [J]. American Economic Review,1996,86:1197-1215
    [25]Nobuyuki Isegawa,N.. Callable Convertible Debt Under Managerial Entrenchment [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2002,8(3);255-270
    [26]Dann, L., and De Angelo. Standstill Agreements, Privately Negotiated Stock Repurchases, and the Market for Corpo rate Control [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1983,11:275-300
    [27]Bradley,Waleman. Managerial Enreenchment and the Managerial Discretion [J]. Journal of Business,1997,70:385-407
    [28]Jorge Farinha,Dividend policy. Corporate Governance and the managerial Entrenchment Hypothesis:AnEmpirical Analysis [J]. NBER,working paper,2002
    [29]Shleifer A. and R. Vishny, Management Entrenchment The case of Management-Specific Intrestment [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1989,25:125-139
    [30]Nagarajan N.K.stvaramakrishnan,Sridhar,S. Management Entrenchment, reputation and corporate investment myopia [J]. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance 1995,10(3):565-585
    [31]Noe,M.J.Rebelle,Renegotiation,Investment Horizons and Managerial Discretion [J].Journal of Business,1997,(70):385-407
    [32]黄国良,程芳.基于管理防御视角的中国上市公司股权融资偏好[J].管理现代化,2007,4:59-61
    [33]王冬年.基于经理管理防御假说的可转换债券融资[J].河北学刊,2007,5:190-193
    [34]李秉祥,王妍斐.经理管理防御对公司债权人与股东利益的影响[J].系统工程,2008,4:117-120
    [35]李秉祥,张明,武晓春.经理管理防御对现金股利支付影响的实证研究[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2007,6:134-140
    [36]刘星,魏锋,戴玉光.经理管理防御下的公司股利政策研究[J].中国会计评论,2004,12: 363-376
    [37]袁春生,杨淑娥.企业非效率投资:经理管理防御视角的分析[J].经济问题,2006,5:40-42
    [38]李秉祥,薛思珊.经理管理防御与企业投资行为研究:述评与展望[J].当代经济管理,2007,12:14-18
    [39]李秉祥,薛思珊.基于经理人管理防御的企业投资短视行为分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,11:55-61
    [40]Lang, L., and Litzenberger, R.. Dividend Announcements:Cash flow signaling vs. free cash flow hypothesis [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1989,24:181-191
    [41]Fazzari, Steven, R. Glenn Hubbard and Bruce Petersen. Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity,1988,2:141-195
    [42]Alti, Aydogan. How sensitive is investment to cash flow when financing is frictionless? [J]. Journal of Finance,2003,58:707-722
    [43]Hovakimian and Hovakimian. Cash flow sensitivity of investment:Firm-Level analysis [J]. Working paper. Baruch College, Fordham University,2003,6:458-479
    [44]潘敏,金岩.信息不对称、股权制度安排与上市企业过度投资[J].金融研究,2003,(1):36-45
    [45]秦朵,宋海岩.改革中的过度投资需求和效率损失[J].经济学(季刊),2003,4:807-832
    [46]北京大学中国经济研究中心宏观组.产权约束、投资低效与通货紧缩[R].经济研究,2004,9:26-35
    [47]刘怀珍,欧阳令南.经理私人收益与过度投资[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,10:44-48
    [48]刘星,曾宏.我国上市公司非理性投资行为:表现、成因及治理[J].中国软科学,2002,1:65-69
    [49]Jensen,M.C.,and W.H.Meckling, Theory of the firm:managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journa of Financial Economics,1976,2:269-286
    [50]Jensen M., Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and take-overs [J]. American Economisc Review,1986,52:589-704
    [51]Stulz,R.M.. Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1990,48:456-658
    [52]Hart,O.,and J.Moore. Debt and seniority:an analysis of the role of hard claims in constraining management [J]. American Econoic Review,1995,42:489-523
    [53]Zwiebel,J.. Dynamic capital structure under management entrenchment [J]. American Economic Review,1996,36:269-298
    [54]Bliss,R.T.,Rosen,R.J.. CEO compensation and bank mergers [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2001,56:326-347
    [55]Grinstein,Y.,Hribar,P.. CEO compensation and incentives-evidence from M&A bonuses [J].Journal of Financial Economics,2004,67:233-245
    [56]Harford,J.,Li,K.. Decoupling CEO wealth and firm performance:The case of acquiring CEOS [J]. Journal of Finance,Forthcoming,2005,45:256-278
    [57]Baker,G.P.,Hall,B.J.. CEO incentives and fir size [J]. Journal of Labor Economics,2004,34:223-235
    [58]Lucian Bebchuk,Yaniv Grinstein. October Firm expansion and CEO pay. NBER Working Paper,2006
    [59]Shleifet,A., and R. Vishny. A survey of Corporate Governance [J]. Journal of financial,1989,52(2): 737-783
    [60]Zingales L.. Corporate governance, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law[J], MacMillan, London,1998,21:189-210
    [61]Jostarndt P.. Financing growth in innovative industries:agency conflicts and the role of hybrid securities-empirical evidence from Nasdaq convertible debt offerings,Working Paper, Finsher Center for the Strategic Use of Information Techology[J]. Haas School of Business,2002,58:456-478
    [62]Roll,R.. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takevers[J]. Journal of Business,1986,78:498-509
    [63]Stein J. G.,Harris M.,Stulz R. Agency,information and corporate investment, in Constantinides,Handbookof the economics of finance [J], North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2001,68:456-478
    [64]Malmendier and Geoffrey Tate. Competencies for HR Professionals:An Interview with Richard E.Boyatzis [J]. Human Resource Management,2004,35(1):119-132
    [65]Urike Malmendier. eoffrey Tate.September CEO over-confidence and corporate in vestemtn [N]. NBER Working PaPer.http:/www.nber.org,2004
    [66]郝颖,刘星,林朝南.我国上市公司高管人员过度投资自信与投资决策的实证研究[J].中国管理科学,2005,10:32-35
    [67]谢海东.基于过度自信理论的公司购并行为分析[J].现代财经,2006,10:35-39
    [68]刘怀珍,欧阳令南.经理人私人利益与过度投资[J],系统工程理论与实践,2004,10:42-45
    [69]周杰.管理层股权结构对我国上市公司投资行为的影响[J].天津商学院学报,2005,10:28-31
    [70]高鸿祯.实验经济学导论[M].中国统计出版社,2003
    [71]王若颖,陈宏民.实验经济学的发展:仿真—实验[J].系统工程理论方法应用,1998,2:45-49
    [72]朱庆.实验经济学评述[J].经济学家,2003,1:105-107
    [73]李彬.行为与实验经济学的奠基人[J].经济学动态,2002,12:78-82
    [74]张耀辉.实验经济学教程[M].经济科学出版社,2006,3:
    [75]洪进,刘仲林,汤书昆.实验经济学,跨学科研究的新典范[[J].科技进步与对策,2004,7:23-27
    [76]高鸿祯.实验经济学理论与力法[J].厦门大学学报,2003,1:32-37
    [77]Denis,D.J., Denis,D.K.. Performance changes following top management dismissals [J]. Journal of Finance,1995,50:1029-1058
    [78]Gilson S C.. Management turnover and financial distress[J]. Journal of Financial Economy, 1989,25(2):241-262
    [79]Nagarajan N.J, Stvaramakrishnan K, Sridhar S S.. Managerial entrenchment, reputation and corporate investment myopia[J]. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance,199510 (3):565-585, 1995
    [80]袁春生,杨淑娥.经理管理防御动因、策略及其经济后果——基于人力资本专用性和专有性的分析[J].管理百科,2008,3:39-41
    [81]周其仁.控制权回报和企业家控制的企业[J].经济研究,1997,5:31-42
    [82]张维迎.控制权损失的不可弥补性和国有企业兼并中的产权障碍[J].经济研究,1998,8:3-14
    [83]张俊生,曾亚敏.董事会特征与总经理变更[J].南开管理评论,2005,1:16-20
    [84]David C.McClelland. Testing for competence rather than for intelligence[J]. American Psychologist, 1973,28:1-14
    [85]Spencer Jr L.M.& Spencer S.M.Competence at work:Models for superior performance[M].NewYork:John Wiley & Sons,Inc,1993:222-226.
    [86]Yeung A.K. Competencies for HR Professionals:An Interview with Richard E.Boyatzis [J]. Human Resource Management,1996,35(1):119-132
    [87]瞿群臻.基于胜任力模型的中国职业经理人市场研究[J].经济动态,2006,9:26-29
    [88]王学军.新兴委托代理下的侵占与治理[D].武汉大学,2007,4:
    [89]李四海.双重委托代理视角下公司治理研究[J].上海市经济管理干部学院学报,2008,1(6):50-54
    [90]白让让.接管壁垒缺失与国有经营者低效更替的发生[J].经济学季刊,2004,3:679-702
    [91]袁春生,杨淑娥.经理固守职位:基于人力资本专用性和专有性的分析[J].经济问题,2007,11:60-62
    [92]陈冬年,陈信元,万华林.国有企业中的薪酬管制与在职消费[J].经济研究,2005,2:92-101
    [93]Shleifer A.R. Vishny. Managerial Entrenchment:TheCase of Manager Specific Investment [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1988,25(1):256-284
    [94]Williamson.O.E.. The economicsofdiscretionarybehavior:managerial objectivesin a theory of the firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NewJersey:PrenticeHall,1964:
    [95]Murphy K.J. Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration:An Empirical Analysis [J] Journal of Accounting and Economics; 1985,7(1):234-256
    [96]Fama,E.F. and M.C.jensen., sparation of Ownership and Control[J]. Journal of Law and ecnomics, 1983,88(2):301-325
    [97]叶芬.风险决策行为的实验经济学研究与中外比较[D].江苏大学,2006,12:
    [98]Baumol. Corporate Investment Myopia:A Horseace of the Theories[J]. Journal of Corpaorate Finance,1959,8:353-371
    [99]Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling. Theory of the Firm:Mananerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1976,3:305-360
    [100]Hambric, D.C., Finkelstein, S. Mangagerial discretion:abridge between polar views of organizational outcomes [J]. Research in Organizational Bahaviro,1987,9:369-406
    [101]Cha-chung Chan, Victor W. Liu and Chun-shun Wu.. Managerial Entrenchment and Financing Decision[J]. Journal of Management and Systems,1998,1:41-62
    [102]李鑫.中国上市公司过度投资行为、程度与形成机理[J].山西大学学报,2007,6:107-111
    [103]Dyer, A.E.. the Economist as Engineer:Game Theory, Experimentation and Computation as Tools for Design Economics[J]. Fisher-Schults Lecture, Econometrics,2002,(7):423-468
    [104]Simth, V.L.. Bargaining and Market Behavior:Essays in Experimental Economics [M]. Cambridge University Press,2000
    [105]Mestlman, Feen. Comparison of Game Theory and Learning Theory[J]. Psychometrics, 1955,21:586-612
    [106]吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2000
    [107]任怡.职业经理人人力资本价值及其评定[D].福州大学硕士学位论文,2004

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700