医患交流中医生话语对病患注意力影响的实证研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
过去几十年间,有关医患交流的话题受到了人们的极大关注,大量系统性的研究被用于这一课题,取得了丰硕的成果。回顾以前的研究成果,不难发现这方面的研究大多从单纯的社会学、语言学或者心理学的角度来进行。要想取得更具有广泛意义上的研究成果,建立更和谐的医患关系,有必要综合这些研究成果,采用跨学科的研究方法。在这样的背景下,本文采取现场观察的方式,通过对仪陇医院门诊部门的医患对话样本以及对针对这一话题所设计的问卷调查的分析,对医患对话中医生的话语是否对病患的注意力有所影响,如何影响以及其对病人问诊时回答方式的影响进行了探索性的研究。
     结合心理学上“注意”研究方面的成果,本文主要探讨以下问题:(1)医生话语(本研究中指对话时间,医生所提出的问题以及医学术语的使用)是否会对病人问诊时的注意力有所影响?(2)医生话语对病人注意力的影响是如何进行的?(3)这种医生话语对病人注意力的影响如何进一步影响病人的回答方式?通过对现场录音所得到的医患对话的文本加以分析并对问卷调查的量化分析,本研究得到以下结论:
     (1)医生话语的三个方面,即对话时长、医生所提问题以及医学术语都对病患注意力分配有影响;
     (2)熟练的语言运用需要各种认知能力的相互配合才能实现,然而由于通常情况下医患对话时间相对较短,一些语言技能如对对话语言的注意,对语言环境中发生的一些变化的注意(语调的变换等)以及在对话过程中表达方式的抑制和选择等并不能顺利的进行;医生所提问题的不同类型会对病患注意力的程度有不同的影响,如一些医学问题会加剧病人的紧张感从而使病人的注意力主要集中在自身的身体状况方面而忽视医生的其他话语,相反一些会话问题和社会心理问题却能一定程度上使病人平静,因此病患能更好的将注意力集中在医生所提供的信息方面;医患对话中过多医学术语的应用会增加病患注意力的负担。
     (3)医生话语的三个方面对病患注意力产生的影响反过来会影响病患的回答方式。在这个过程中,由于注意力资源的保持和转移使得病患的回答方式通常伴有短暂的停顿、问题的重复以及一些肢体语言的运用等。也正因为这些回答方式的适当转变才使得整个问诊对话才得以完整的进行。
     全文共分五章:
     第一章阐述了论文的研究背景、目的、重要性以及文章的结构。
     第二章是对医患交流以及注意相关研究的批评性回顾。总结和概括了医患交流以及注意研究理论及实证方面研究的成果,提出了存在的问题。
     第三章阐述了医患对话中医生话语的三个重要方面即对话时间,医生提出的问题以及医学术语的相关内容。
     第四章阐述了研究问题,参与者,研究过程以及具体方法。对转录后的医患对话文本内容进行了定性分析并对问卷做了量化分析。
     第六章总结了前面的内容,并明确提出医生话语对病患注意力影响的实际性意义。指出了本研究的局限性以及可能为以后研究所提供的参考价值。
Over the last few decades, considerable attention has been paid to the study of doctor-patient communication and extensive systematic empirical research has been conducted, which has brought forth fruitful results. However, after a review of the literature, it is found that most studies were carried out from the sociological, linguistic or psychological perspective respectively. To make research on doctor-patient communication more meaningful, it is necessary to use multi-disciplinarily and interdisciplinary research approach so as to provide more clues about how to establish a good doctor-patient relationship. The present study, therefore, adopts real-life observation to investigate the doctor-patient conversations in outpatient department of Yilong Hospital. Linguistic material is obtained through tape-recording on the spot. And before the research is done, questionnaires concerning the study issue have been handed out to selected participants to collect data.
     The study, combining psychological studies on attention with linguistic studies on doctor-patient communication, addresses the following questions:(1) Does the discourse of doctor, namely, the length of conversation duration, questions in doctor-patient dialogue and the use of medical jargon have effects on patient's attention? (2) How does the discourse of doctor influence patient's allocating of attention? (3) How does such discourse affect patient's way of response?
     After analysis of the data by using both quantitative and qualitative methods, the thesis reached the following findings:
     (1) All of the three aspects of doctor's discourse have effects on patient's allocating of attention resources.
     (2) Skilled language use, requires the coordination of a number of cognitive abilities, while some language skills such as attending to a conversation, attending to changes in a linguistic environment (i.e., change in tone of voice; introduction of unexpected ideas), as well as inhibiting and selecting particular expressions cannot proceed smoothly as a result of the general short conversation duration. Different kinds of questions asked by doctor have different effects on the degree of patient's concentration of attention:some medical questions intensify the degree of patient's nervousness, which cause patient's attention to be mainly focused on his/her physical states; while conversational questions and psychosocial questions can calm down patient, thus he/she can better focus on the conversational information provided by doctor. And too many medical terminologies used by doctor increase attention load to patient.
     (3) Patient's way of responses may change due to the impact of doctor's discourse on patient's attention. In this process, the sustaining of attention on one object and shifting of attention from one object to another object make patient's response way often accompanied with "temporary stop", "repeat of questions" or even "body gestures". In this way, the whole medical conversation goes further.
     This dissertation consists of five chapters. The first chapter introduces the background to the study, purpose and significance of the study as well as organization of this thesis. Chapter Two critically reviews the development of the research on doctor-patient communication comprehensively and research on attention related. Chapter Three elaborates three important aspects of doctor's discourse in doctor-patient communication:namely, conversation duration, questions in doctor-patient dialogue and medical jargon. Chapter Four presents the research issue, participants, research procedure and methods, and analyses the results. Chapter Five makes a conclusion about the impact that doctor's discourse may have on patient as well as the influence it has on patient's way of response; then limitations and research implications of the study are presented and at last, it recommends further areas for future study.
引文
Al-Hejin, B. (2004). Attention and awareness:evidence from cognitive and second language acquisition research. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics,4, 1-22.
    Beckman, H. B., Kaplan, S. H.,& Frankel, R. M. (1989). Outcome-based research on doctor-patient communication:a review. In Stewart M. A. and Roter, D. L. (Eds.) Communicating with medical patients (pp.223-227). Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publication.
    Beisecker, A.,& Beisecker, T. D. (1990). Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors. Med. Care 28,19.
    Bennett, G. (1979). Patients and their doctors. London:Bailliere Tindall.
    Bertakis, K.D., Roter, D.,& Putman, S.M. (1991). The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction. Journal of Familv Practice.32(2),175-181.
    Betchart, N. S., Anderson, D. G, Thompson, T. L.,& Mumford, E. A. (1984). Tutorial approach to improving medical students'interviewing skills. J. Med. Educ.59,431.
    Bird, B. (1973). Talking with patients. Philadelphia:J. B. Lippincott Company.
    Bourhis, R. Y, Roth, S.,& MacQueen, G (1989). Communication in the hospital setting:a survey of medical and everyday language use amongst patients, nurses and doctors. Soc. Sci. Med.28(4),339-46
    Browne, G.,& Freeling, P. (1976). The doctor-patient relationship in diagnosis and treatment. In D. Pendleton,& Hasler, J. (Eds.), Doctor-patient communication. London. New York:Academic Press.
    Buchnan, I.C.,& Richardson, I.M. (1973). Time study of consultations in general practice. In:Scottish health services statistics, no 27. Edinburgh:Scottish Home and Health Department.
    Butler, J.,& Calnan, M. (1987). Too many patients? A study of the economy of time and standards of care in general practice. Aldershot:Avebury.
    Caiman, A. C. T.,& Davidson, M. (1998). The impact of gender and its interaction with role and status on the use of tag questions in meetings:women in management review [J]. Language in Society,4,289-94.
    Calman, K.C.,& Donaldson, M. (1991). The pre-registration house officer year:a critical incident study. Medical Education.25(1),51-59.
    Chaitchik, S., Kreitler, S., Shaked, S., Schwartz, I.,& Rosin, R. (1992). Doctor-patient communication in a cancer ward. J. Cancer Educ.7,41.
    Comstock, L. M., Hooper, E. M., Goodwin, J. M. et.al. (1982). Physician behaviors that correlate with patient satisfaction. J. Med. Educ.57,105.
    Doherty, E, O'Boyle C.A., Shannon, W., McGee, H.,& Bury, G. (1990). Communication skills training in undergraduate medicine. Ir MedJ.,83,54-56.
    Evans, B.J., Standley, R.O., Mestrovic, R.,& Rose L. (1991). Effects of communication skills training on students'diagnostic efficiency. Medical Education,25,517-526
    Eviatar, Z. (1998). Attention as a psychological entity and its effects on language and communication. In B. Stemmer & H.A. Whitaker (eds.), Handbook of Neurolinguisitcs (pp.275-287). New York:Academic Press.
    Fallowfield, L. J.,& Baum, M. (1989) Psychological welfare of patients with breast cancer. J. R. Soc. Med.82,4.
    Fisher, S. (1982). The decision-making context. How doctors and patients communicate. In R. J. Di Pietro, Linguistics and professions. Norwood, New Jersey:Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Fisher, S. (1984). Institutional authority and the structure of discourse. Discourse Processes.
    Fisher, S.,& Todd, A. (eds.) (1983). The social organization of doctor patient communication. Washington, D. C:Centre for Applied Linguistics.
    Frankel, R. M. (1984). Physicians and patients in social interaction:medical encounters as a discourse process. Discourse Process,7(2),103-224.
    Gass, S. M.,& Torres, A. (2005). ATTENTION WHEN? An investigation of the ordering effect of input and interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,27,1-31.
    Gopher, D., Armony, L.,& Greenshpan, Y. (2000). Switching tasks and attention policies. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,129,308-339.
    Gray, J. (1982). The effect of the doctor's sex on the doctor patient relationship. J R Coll Gen Pract,32,167-169.
    Greenfield, S., Kaplan, S.H.,& Ware, JE. Jr. (1985). Expanding patient involvement in care:effects on patients outcome. Annals of Internal Medicine,102(4),520-28.
    Gu, Yueguo (1996). Doctor-patient interaction as goal-oriented discourse. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication,7,156-176.
    Hadlow, J.,& Pitts, M. (1991). The understanding of common health terms by doctors, nurses and patients. Soc. Sci. Med.32,193.
    Hampton, J., Harrison, M., Mitchell J. Prichard, J.& Seymour, C. (1975). Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. British Medical Journal.2, 486-489.
    Hefler, R. E. (1970). An objective comparison of the pediatric interviewing skills of freshman and senior medical students. Pediatrics,45,623-627.
    Howie, J.G.R., Porter, A.M.D.& Forbes, J.F. (1989). Quality and the use of time in general practice:widening the discussion. BMJ,298,1008-1010.
    Hudson, R.A. (2000). Sociolinguistics. Foreign language teaching and research press
    Hughes, D. (1983). Consultation length and outcome in two group general practices. J R Coll Gen Pract,33,143-147
    Ibrahim, Y. (2001). Doctor and patient questions as a measure of doctor-centeredness in UAE hospitals. English for Specific Purposes,20(4),331-344.
    James, W. (1890). The principle of psychology. New York:Holt. Vol.1,403-404
    Jonas, A. P. (1995). A study of doctors'and patients'perceptions of information processing and communication competence during the medical interview. Health Communication,7(3),179-203.
    Kaplan, S. H., Greenfield, S.,& Ware, J. E. (1989). Impact of the doctor-patient relationship on the outcomes of chronic disease. In Communicating With Medical Patients (Edited by Stewart M. A. and Roter D. L.). Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
    Knight, R. (1987). The importance of list size and consultation length as factors in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract,37,19-22
    Korsh, B. M., Gozzi, E. K.,& Francis, V. (1968). Gaps in doctor-patient communications: doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics,42,855-870
    Kosslyn, S.M.,& Rosenberg, R.S. (2004). Fundamentals of psychology:the brain, the person, the world. Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
    Labov, W.& Fanshel D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse:psychotherapy as conversation. New York:Academic Press.
    Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume Ⅰ:Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA:Standford University Press.
    Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking:From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
    Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Language production:A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp.83-122). Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
    Ley, P. (1988). Communicating with patients. Chapman and Hall, London.
    Maguire, G. P.,& Rutter, D.R. (1976). History-taking for medical students:Deficiencies in performance. The lancet,556-558.
    Meuleman, J. R.,& Harvard, M. P. (1992). Assessing medical interview performance: effect of interns'gender and month of training. Archives of Internal Medicine.152(8), 1677-1680.
    Mishler, E. Cx (1984). The discourse of medicine:Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, N. J.:Ablex.
    Morell, D.C., Evans, M.E, Morris R.W,& Roland, M.O. (1986). The "five minute" consultation:effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction. BMJ,292,870-873.
    Morell, D.C, Roland, M.O. (1987). How can good GP care be achieved? BMJ,294, 161-162.
    Parsons, T. (1951).The social system. New Fork:Free Press.
    Raynes, N.V.,& Cairns, V. (1980). Factors contributing to the length of general practice consultation. JR Coll Gen Pract,30,496-498
    Richards, J. C, Platt, J.,& Platt, H. (1998). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (English Chinese edition). Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    Robinson, P. (1995). Review article:attention, memory, and the noticing hypothesis. Language Learning,45,283-331.
    Roter, D. L. (1989). Which facets of communication have strong effects on outcome—a meta analysis. In Stewart M. A.& Roter D. L (Eds.), Communicating with Medical Patients. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
    Roter, D. L.,& Stwart, M. (1989). Communicating with patients. Newbury Park CA: SAGE.
    Samovar, L.A. (2000). Communication between cultures foreign language. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press
    Sandler, G. (1980). The importance of the history in the medical clinic and the cost of unnecessary tests. Am Heart J,100,928-931.
    Shea, J. A., Frenkel, E. P.,& Webster, G. D. (1990). Training and practice activities of hematology and medical oncology diplomats. Archives of Internal Medicine,150(1), 145-148.
    Shuy, R. W. (1979). Three types of inferences to an effective exchange of information in the medical interview. Society of Computer Medicine, Atlanta, GA,
    Simpson, M., Buckman, R.,& Stewart M et al. (1991). Doctor-patient communication:the Toronto consensus statement. Br Med J,303,1385-1387.
    Slobin, D. (1996). From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking". In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp.70-96) Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
    Slobin, D. (1997). The origins of grammaticizable notions:beyond the individual mind. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volume 5: Expanding the contexts (pp.265—323). Mahwah; NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Slobin, D. (2003). Language and thought online:cognitive consequence of linguistic— relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind:advances in the study of thought and language (pp.157-191). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
    Spolsky, B. (2000). Sociolinguistics. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press
    Street, R. L. (1991) Information-giving in medical consultations:the influence of patients' communicative styles and personal characteristics. Soc. Sci. Med.32,541.
    Stuss, D. T., Shallice, T., Alexander, M. P.,& Picton, T. W. (1995). A multidisciplinary
    approach to anterior attentional functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,769,191-211.
    Ten Have, P. (1989). The consultation as a genre. December 12,2004, from www2.fmg.uva.nl/emca/paul.htm.
    Thomson, B., Collins, M.J.,& Hearn, G. (1990). Clinician interpersonal communication skills and contact lens wearers'motivation, satisfaction and compliance. Optometry and Vision Science,69 (9),673-678.
    Todd, A.,& Fisher, S. (Eds.) (1993). The social organization of doctor-patient communication (2nd, ed.) USA:Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Tomlin, R. S.,& Villa, V (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,16,183-203.
    Verderber, G.W. (1999). The colors of nature. Vermont Magazine.
    Vincent, C.A. (1992).Medical accidents, In Mann R., Ed Audit and Accountability (pp.219-228). London; Royal society of Medicine.
    West, C. (1984). Routine complications:trouble with talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
    Westcott, R. (1977). The length of consultations in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract, 27,552-555.
    Whitehous, C.R. (1987). A survey of the management of psychosocial illness in general practice in Manchester. J R Coll Gen Pract,37,112-115
    Williams, M.,& Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers:a social constructivist approach. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    Wilson, A. (1991). Consultation length in general practice:a review. Br J Gen Pract,41, 119-122.
    Wood, N. L.,& Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited:attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,124,243-262.
    冯鸿滔(Feng,H.-T.),(2006),普通心理学,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。
    李彦博(Li,Y .-B.)、法云智(Fa,Y.-Z.)、夏侠(Xia, X.),(2003),浅谈医生与病人的交流[J],《医患关系》第23期,11页。
    李新华(Li, X.-H.),孙琦(Sun, Q.),(2004),注重医患交流能力的培养[J],《国现代医学杂志》第11期18,页。
    梁宁建(Liang, N.-J.),(2006),《心理学导论上》,上海:上海教育出版社。
    Sternberg, R.J.(2002). Cognitive psychology. Wadsworth Publishing.中译本:杨炳钧、陈燕、邹芝玲译,(2006),《认知心理学》,北京:中国轻工业出版社。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700