考虑消费者有限理性行为的动态定价研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年来,越来越多的厂商在运营中采用收益管理和动态定价,厂商要成功实施收益管理和动态定价的关键是正确地理解消费者行为。目前国内外学者对于动态定价的研究大都假设消费者是完全理性的(full rational),例如消费者有无限的认知和计算能力来对其购买决策进行完美的优化。然而,现实中面对复杂的市场环境,受心理偏差、认知偏差、计算能力和不完全信息等因素的影响,消费者无法进行完全理性的决策,相反他们通常是在有限理性的(bounded rational)框架下进行购买决策。
     决策偏差是一类典型的有限理性行为,它是指个人受自身认知能力限制、心理偏差、情感影响等因素作用而做出偏离完全理性最优决策时所产生的偏差。虽然,动态定价研究和应用中考虑对消费者有限理性行为的建模有着重要的理论意义和现实需求,但是,关于消费者决策偏差有限理性行为下的动态定价研究尚处于起步阶段。本论文提出了消费者决策偏差有限理性行为下的动态定价问题,特别针对消费者惰性(consumer inertia)行为和两阶段选择(two-stage choice)行为下的厂商动态定价问题进行具体深入的研究。
     以运筹学、经济学、营销学等多学科交叉理论为基础,采用动态规划、现代启发式算法、数值实验和仿真等方法研究了消费者惰性行为和两阶段选择行为下的动态定价与品类优化问题,分析消费者决策偏差有限理性行为对厂商动态定价的影响,探讨可行的干预策略来缓解消费者惰性行为和两阶段选择行为对厂商定价与品类优化决策的不利影响。综述了消费者行为理论和动态定价建模的研究进展。主要研究工作及成果总结如下:
     (1)研究了考虑消费者惰性行为的垄断厂商的单产品动态定价问题。消费者惰性行为是指消费者具有的固有的购买延迟倾向,这种倾向能够使消费者从目标角度看来立即购买是最优选择的情况下,仍然选择等待。构建了考虑消费者惰性行为的垄断厂商多阶段动态定价的动态规划模型,推导了厂商最优定价策略。研究表明:1)消费者惰性行为会损害厂商的预期利润;2)产品的最优价格随着惰性深度(惰性的程度)和惰性宽度(消费者表现出惰性行为的概率)的增加而单调递减;3)数值算例表明惰性深度对最优价格和预期利润的边际效应是递减的,而惰性深度的边际效应是递增的。针对消费者惰性行为的负面影响,给出了一些可行的干预策略。研究成果为厂商认识消费者惰性行为,了解消费者惰性深度和宽度对其预期利润以及最优动态价格的影响提供了理论基础,并为厂商开发和改进其营销策略提供了决策支持。
     (2)研究了考虑消费者惰性行为的可替代产品动态定价问题。消费者通常在众多竞争的替代产品之间进行选择。首先,构建了考虑消费者惰性行为的可替代产品动态定价决策模型,然后,在给定初始库存和消费者惰性水平下,推导了厂商最优动态定价策略。研究表明:1)在可替代产品情形下,消费者惰性行为同样对厂商的预期利润具有显著的负面效应;2)消费者惰性行为的惰性深度和惰性宽度两个维度都对每个产品的最优价格产生负面影响;3)消费者惰性行为的边际效应随着惰性深度的增加而降低,随着惰性宽度的增加而增加;4)探讨了不同库存水平下产品之间的最优价格演化模式,论证了在动态替代情形下,每一个产品变量的最优价格不一定随着销售时间的流逝而递减,而且,每一个产品变量的最优价格也不一定随着库存水平的减少而上升。研究成果为可替代产品情形下考虑消费者惰性行为的动态定价策略制定提供了理论依据。
     (3)研究了考虑消费者两阶段选择行为的垄断厂商的多阶段动态定价问题。消费者两阶段选择行为是指:由于决策偏差和能力的限制,在产品浏览阶段,消费者首先从可用的产品中挑选一部分产品,形成选择子集,然后在产品购买阶段,消费者从精简的选择子集中购买产品。在网络收益管理框架下,运用动态规划方法构建了考虑消费者两阶段选择行为的可替代产品动态定价决策模型,并且运用非线性规划方法对原问题进行了近似,运用增广的拉格朗日方法得出了静态的最优价格。通过数值算例表明:1)消费者两阶段选择行为损害垄断厂商的预期收益;2)随着初始资源容量水平不足的增加,平均预期收益首先保持稳定,然后显著下降;3)随着初始资源容量水平不足的增加,平均静态最优价格先逐渐上升,然后迅速提升;4)厂商的平均预期收益总是随消费者选择子集大小的增加而增加,且平均预期收益的增加速率单调下降。研究成果为厂商了解两阶段选择行为对厂商预期收益与静态最优价格的影响提供了理论基础,为厂商应对消费者两阶段选择行为产生的负面效应、优化和改进动态定价策略提供了决策支持。
     (4)研究了考虑消费者两阶段选择行为的垄断厂商的多阶段动态价格结构与品类优化问题。首先,在网络收益管理框架下,研究了固定价格情形下的考虑消费者两阶段选择行为的品类优化问题,建立了动态规划模型,设计了基于选择的确定性线性规划(choice-based deterministic linearprogramming,CDLP)的近似求解算法,推导了最优的品类组合。然后,进一步拓展模型,研究了考虑消费者两阶段选择行为的联合动态定价结构和品类优化问题,建立了问题的决策优化模型,并设计了有效的求解方法。在固定价格情形下,通过数值算例表明:1)消费者两阶段选择行为损害厂商的平均预期收益;2)厂商的平均预期收益随着选择子集大小的增加而增加;3)厂商提供的产品平均种数与平均总时间均随消费者选择子集大小的增加先增加后减小。研究成果为厂商理解消费者两阶段选择行为对品类优化的影响提供了初步的理论基础,为制定相应的营销策略提供了方向。
     本文的主要创新点及贡献可以归纳为以下几个方面:
     (1)放松了现有文献中关于考虑两个销售阶段的惰性行为动态定价的假设,分别针对垄断厂商销售单产品和可替代产品的情形,首次将考虑多个销售阶段的消费者惰性行为引入动态规划模型,提出了最优价格的求解方法与最优价格的结构,得出了一系列新的结论,如验证了消费者惰性深度和宽度对厂商预期利润的负面影响,系统地分析了不同库存水平下的最优定价策略、可替代产品的价格演变模式以及产品间最优价格的关系等。
     (2)首次在动态定价研究中引入了消费者两阶段选择行为,建立了考虑消费者两阶段选择行为的新的需求模型与动态定价决策模型,并在模型中加入了补偿性的线性启发式规则,考虑了产品属性、消费者偏好和厂商营销策略之间的关系。第一次较全面地分析了消费者两阶段选择行为对厂商预期收益和静态最优价格的影响。
     (3)首次把消费者两阶段选择行为引入动态定价结构与品类优化研究中,构建了一个新的考虑消费者两阶段选择行为的动态定价结构与品类优化决策模型,从厂商预期收益和品类优化的角度,第一次较具体地分析了消费者两阶段选择行为的影响。
     (4)基于对消费者惰性与两阶段选择行为动态定价及品类优化的分析,结合消费者惰性与两阶段选择行为产生的原因,分别提出了一些新的可操作的营销策略来消除或减缓消费者惰性与两阶段选择行为的不利影响。
Recent years, more and more firms adopt dynamic pricing and revenue management strategy inmarketing and operations management. The key of implementing revenue management and dynamicpricing strategy lies in correctly understanding the consumer behavior. Nowadays, most of the scholarsin the field of revenue management and dynamic pricing assume that consumers are full rational, forexample, consumers have unlimited knowledge and computational abilities to make perfect purchasingdecisions. However, when faced with complicated market environment, and affected by incompleteinformation factors such as, psychological biases, cognitive biases as well as computational abilities,consumers cannot make rational decisions, and they rather make decisions in the framework ofbounded rationality.
     Decision bias is a classical bounded rational behavior, and it means the deviations from theoptimal decisions made by full rational behavior due to the factors such as, psychological biases,cognitive biases as well as affection influences. Although it is very important both academically andpractically to investigate the dynamic pricing strategies and its application under consumers’ boundedrational behavior in revenue management, the research on dynamic pricing considering consumerdecision bias bounded rational behavior, is still in its infancy. This dissertation proposes the dynamicpricing problem in the presence of consumers’ decision bias bounded rational behavior, and especiallyfocuses on the dynamic pricing strategies problem faced by firms who consider consumer inertia andconsumer two-stage choice behavior.
     This dissertation applies multiple theories such as operations management, economics, marketingscience, and adopts various research methods such as dynamic programming, modern heuristicalgorithms, numerical experiments and simulation to examine the dynamic pricing and assortmentoptimization strategies in the presence of decision biases of bounded rational consumers. The effects ofconsumers’ decision bias bounded rational behavior on firms’ dynamic pricing strategies are analyzed.Some practical marketing strategies are also discussed to mitegate the negative effects generated byconsumer inertia and two-stage choice behavior. The main literatures on consumer behavior theory anddynamic pricing models are reviewed. The literature review covers the following topics, including theconcept and research areas of revenue management, the theory and research method of dynamic pricing,consumers’ behavior theory, consumers’ full rational behavior theory, consumers’ bounded rational behavior theory, the theory and application of consumer inertia and two-stage choice behavior, dynamicpricing of full rational consumers, and dynamic pricing and assortment optimization under consumer’sbounded rational behavior. Future research areas are also proposed regarding the aspects on dynamicpricing and revenue management of bounded rational consumer behavior.The main research work andresults are summarized as below:
     (1)A dynamic pricing problem for a monopolist selling single perishable good to consumerswho may be influenced by inertia is studied. Consumer inertia refers to consumers’ inherent tendencyof purchase procrastination and may induce consumers to wait even when immediate purchase isoptimal from an objective perspective. A multiperiod dynamic programming model of a monopolistwho dynamically pricing its products in the presence of consumer inertia is developed and the optimaldynamic pricing policy is also derived. The results show that1)consumer inertia hurts firm’s expectedrevenues;2)the optimal prices are monotonically decreasing in both inertia depth(the extent of inertia)and inertia breadth(the probability with which a consumer exhibits inertial bias);3)through numericalillustrations, it shows that the marginal effects of inertia depth on optimal prices and expected revenuesare decreasing, whereas the marginal effects of inertia breadth are increasing. Some marketingstrategies are provided to mitigate the negative effects of consumer inertia. This research provides thetheoretical foundation for firms to understand consumers’ inertia behavior, and the effects of consumerinertia depth as well as inertia breadth on its expected revenues and optimal prices. The research alsoprovides decision supports to develop and improve firms’ operational management.
     (2)A dynamic pricing problem for substitutable products in the presence of inertial consumers isstudied. Consumers typically choose among a variety of competing substitutes. First, a dynamic pricingdecision model of substitutable products considerting consumer inertia is developed. Then the firm’soptimal prices given initial inventory of substitutable products and consumer inertia are presented.Through numerical illustrations, it is demonstrated that1)under substitutable products’ situation,consumer inertia significantly produce negative effects on firm’s expected revenues;2)the negativeeffect is decreasing as inertia depth increases, and increasing as inertia breadth increases;3)the optimalprices’ evolvement patterns of substitutable products under different inventory levels are also examined,that is,the optimal price of each product variate does not necessarily decreases in time or inventorylevel.This research provides theoretical basis for firms to understand the effects of consumer inertia onthe dynamic pricing strategies of substitutable products.
     (3)A multiperiod dynamic pricing problem of a monopolist selling substitutable perishable products to consumers who have two-stage choice behavior is studied. Consumer’s two-stage choicebehavior refers to the phenomenon that due to decision bias and ability limitation, consumers usuallyform a choice set first during the products viewing stage, and then select a product from this simplifiedchoice set. In the framework of network revenue management, a decision model of substitutableproducts considering the two-stage choice behavior is formulated using the finite-horizon dynamicprogramming. It is then approximated as a constrained nonlinear programming problem, and the staticoptimal pricing policy is derived using augmented Lagrange method. Finally, through numericalexperiments, it finds that1)consumers’ two-stage choice behavior hurt retailers’ expected revenues;2)the expected revenues stay stable and then drop significantly as the intial resource capacity scarcitylevel increases;3)the static optimal prices increase gradually first and then pick up quickly as the intialresource capacity scarcity level increases.4)the average expected revenues increase as the size ofchoice set increases, and the increase rates of the average expected revenues are monotically decreasing.This research provides theoretical basis for firms to understand the effects of two-stage choice behavioron retailers’ expected revenues as well as static optimal prices. Furthermore, it provides decisionsupports for firms to cope with the negative effects generated by consumers’ two-stage choice behavior,and it helps firms to optimize as well as improve its’ dynamic pricing policies.
     (4)A multiple stage assortment optimization problem faced by a monopoly firm in the presenceof consumers’ two-stage choice behavior is studied. In the framework of revenue management, anassortment optimization model with fixed prices considering consumer’s two-stage choice behavior isfirst proposed, and the choice deterministic linear programming method(CDLP)is designed toapproximate the solution. Furthermore, the maximum expected revenues and the static optimal pricesare derived. Moreover, the above model is expanded to jointly optimize pricing structure andassortment optimization, and its solution is also derived. Through numerical examples, it shows that1)consumers’ two-stage choice behavior hurt firms’ average expected revenues;2)firms’ averageexpected revenues increase as the size of choice set increases;3)the average types of products offerand the average time of products offer first increase and then decrease as the size of choice setincreases. This research provides theoretical foundation for retailers to thoroughly understand theeffects of consumers’ two-stage choice behavior on its expected revenues and optimal productassortments. Also, the research provides directions for making corresponding marketing strategieswhen facing two-stage choice behavior.
     Based on the above analysis and discussion, the main innovations and contributions of thisdissertation are summarized as below:
     (1)Relax the assumptions of two stage consumer inertia dynamic pricing. Both situations wherea monopolist sells single product and substitutable products are considered, and consumer inertia isincorporated in the mutiperiod dynamic pricing programming models for the first time. Moreover, thestructure properties are analyzed and the optimal dynamic pricing strategies are derived. A series ofnew results are developed. For example, the negative effects of consumer inertia depth and inertiabreadth on firms’ expected profits are verified, as well as the relationship between optimal pricingpolicies under different inventoy levels, the price evolvement patterns of substitutable products and theoptimal prices of different products is systematically analyzed.
     (2)By incorporating consumers’ two-stage choice behavior in the context of dynamic pricing forthe first time, a new dynamic pricing model based on two-stage choice demand is constructed. Acompensate linear decision heuristics are incorporated in the model, and the relationship betweenproducts attributes, consumer preferences and marketing strategies are considered. The effects oftwo-stage choice behavior on firms’ expected revenues and static optimal prices are systematicallyinvestigated for the first time.
     (3)By incorporating consumers’ two-stage choice behavior in the context of dynamic pricingstructure and assortment optimization for the first time, a dynamic pricing structure and assortmentoptimization model considering two-stage choice behavior is constructed. The effects of two-stagechoice behavior on firms’ expected revenues and optimal assortment selections are systematicallyinvestigated for the first time.
     (4)Based on the above theoretical analysis and the causes of consumers’ inertia and two-stagechoice behavior, some new practical marketing strategies to eliminate or mitigate the negative effectsgenerated by these two behaviors are provided.
引文
[1] Adida, E., Perakis, G.(2007)."A nonlinear continuous time optimal control model of dynamicpricing and inventory control with no backorders." Naval Research Logistics54(7):767-795.
    [2] Ajay K. Manrai, Andrews, R. L.(1998)."Two-stage discrete choice models for scanner paneldata: An assessment of process and assumptions." European Journal of Operational Research111(2):193-215.
    [3] Amir, O., Ariely, D.(2005)."The Pain of Deciding: Indecision, Procrastination, and ConsumerChoice Online", Working paper, Yale University.
    [4] Anderson, S. P., Palma, A. D., Thisse, J-F.(1992)"Discrete Choice Theory of ProductDifferentiation." The MIT Press, Cambridge
    [5] Andrews, R. L., Srinivasan, T. C.(1995)."Studying Consideration Effects in Empirical ChoiceModels Using Scanner Panel Data." Journal of Marketing Research32(1):30-41.
    [6] Ariely, D.(2009)."The End of Rational Economics." Harvard Business Review July-August
    [7] Asdemir, K., Jacob, V. S., Krishnan, R.(2009)."Dynamic pricing of multiple home deliveryoptions." European Journal of Operational Research196(1):246-257.
    [8] Aviv, Y., Pazgal, A.(2008)."Optimal Pricing of Seasonal Products in the Presence ofForward-Looking Consumers." Manufacturing&Service Operations Management10(3):339-359.
    [9] Aydin, G., Porteus, E. L.(2008)."Joint Inventory and Pricing Decisions for an Assortment."Operations Research56(5):1247-1255.
    [10] Aydin, G., Ziya, S.(2009)."Technical Note--Personalized Dynamic Pricing of LimitedInventories." Operations Research57(6):1523-1531.
    [11] Baker, T. K., Collier, D. A.(2003)."The Benefit of Optimizing Prices to Manage Demand inHotel Revenue Management Systems." Production and Operations Management12(4):502-518.
    [12] Bart J. Bronnenberg, Vanhonacker, W. R.(1996)."Limited choice sets, local price response andimplied measures of price competition." Journal of Marketing Research33(2):163-173.
    [13] Bawa, K.(1990)."Modeling inertia and variety seeking tendencies in brand choice behavior."Marketing Science9(3):263-278.
    [14] Bearden, J. N., Murphy, R. O., Rapoport, A(.2008)."Decision Biases in Revenue Management:Some Behavioral Evidence." Manufacturing&Service Operations Management10(4):625-636.
    [15] Bellman R.E. Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey,1957.
    [16] Ben-Akiva, M., Boccara, B.(1995)."Discrete choice models with latent choice sets."International Journal of Research in Marketing.12(1):9-24.
    [17] Bendoly, E., Donohue, K., Schultz, K. L.(2006)."Behavior in operations management:Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions." Journal of Operations Management24(6):737-752.
    [18] Bernstein, F., Federgruen, A.(2004)."Dynamic inventory and pricing models for competingretailers." Naval Research Logistics51(2):258-274.
    [19] Bertsimas, D., Boer, S. de.(2005)."Simulation-Based Booking Limits for Airline RevenueManagement". Operations Research53(1):90-106.
    [20] Besbes, O., Zeevi, A.(2009)."Dynamic Pricing Without Knowing the Demand Function: RiskBounds and Near-Optimal Algorithms." Operaions Research opre.1080.0640.
    [21] Bettman, J., Luce, M., Payne, J(.1998)."Constructive Consumer Choice Processes." Journal ofConsumer Research25(3):187-217.
    [22] Bisi, A.,Dada, M(.2007)."Dynamic learning, pricing, and ordering by a censored newsvendor."Naval Research Logistics54(4):448-461.
    [23] Bitran, G., Caldentey, R., Vial, R(.2006)."Pricing policies for perishable products with demandsubstitution". Boston, MA., Sloan School of Management MIT.
    [24] Bj rn Vroomen, Philip Hans Fransesb, Nieropc, E. v.(2004)."Modeling consideration sets andbrand choice using artificial neural networks " European Journal of Operational Research154(1):206-217.
    [25] Boer, A. d., Zwart, B.(2011)."Dynamic Pricing and Learning with Finite Inventories".Amsterdam, Working paper, CentrumWiskunde&Informatica(CWI).
    [26] Botti, S., Iyengar, S. S(.2004)"The Psychological Pleasure and Pain of Choosing: When PeoplePrefer Choosing at the Cost of Subsequent Outcome Satisfaction." J Pers Soc Psychol87(3):312-326
    [27] Boudreau, J., Hopp, W., McClain, J. O., Thomas, L. J.(2003)."On the Interface BetweenOperations and Human Resources Management." Manufacturing&Service OperationsManagement5(3):179-202.
    [28] Broder, J., Rusmevichientong, P.(2010)."Dynamic Pricing under a General Parametric ChoiceModel", Working paper, Cornell University.
    [29] Bronnenberg, B. J., Vanhonacker, W. R(.1996)."Limited Choice Sets, Local Price Response andImplied Measures of Price Competition." Journal of Marketing Research33(2):163-173.
    [30] Bront, J. J. M., Mendez-Diaz, I., Vulcano, G.(2009)."A Column Generation Algorithm forChoice-Based Network Revenue Management." Operations Research57(3):769-784.
    [31] Brynjolfsson, E.,Smith, M. D.(2000)."Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet andConventional Retailers." Management Science46(3):563-585.
    [32] Cachon, G. P., K k, A.G.(2007)."Category management and coordination in retail assortmentoptimization in the presence of basket shopping consumers" Management Science54(6):934-951.
    [33] Cachon, G. P., Swinney, R(.2009)."Purchasing, Pricing, and Quick Response in the Presence ofStrategic Consumers." Management Science53(6):1132-1146.
    [34] Celik, S., Maglaras, C.(2008)."Dynamic Pricing and Lead-Time Quotation for a MulticlassMake-to-Order Queue." Management Science54(6):1132-1146.
    [35] Chase, V. M., Hertwig, R., Gigerenzer, G.(1998)."Visions of Rationality " Trends in CognitiveSciences2(6):206-214
    [36] Chatwin, R. E(.2000)."Optimal dynamic pricing of perishable products with stochastic demandand a finite set of prices." European Journal of Operational Research125(1):149-174.
    [37] Chen, L., Plambeck, E. L.(2008)."Dynamic Inventory Management with Learning About theDemand Distribution and Substitution Probability." Manufacturing&Service OperationsManagement10(2):236-256.
    [38] Chernev, A.,Hamilton, R.(2009)."Assortment Size and Option Attractiveness in ConsumerChoice Among Retailers." Journal of Marketing Research46(3):410-420.
    [39] Chintagunta, P., Rao, V.(1996)"Pricing strategies in a dynamic duopoly: A differential gamemodel."Management Science,42(11)1501-1514.
    [40] Chou, F.-S., Parlar, M(.2006)."Optimal control of a revenue management system with dynamicpricing facing linear demand." Optimal Control Applications and Methods27(6):323-347.
    [41] Conlisk, J.(1996)."Why Bounded Rationality?" J. Econom. Literature34(2):669-700
    [42] Cooper, W. H.(2011)."Misspecification and Parameter Estimation".2011INFORMS AnnualMeeting Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
    [43] Cope, E.(2007)."Bayesian strategies for dynamic pricing in e-commerce." Naval ResearchLogistics54(3):265-281.
    [44] Dan Zhang, Lu, Z.(2010)."Assessing the Value of Dynamic Pricing in Network RevenueManagement."Working paper, Cornell University:1-25.
    [45] Dana, J. J(2008)."New Directions in Revenue Management Research." Production andOperations Management17(4):399-401.
    [46] Darpy, D.(2000)."Consumer Procrastination and Purchase Delay." Ma tre de Conférences.Université Paris Dauphine.
    [47] Desaulniers, G., Desrosiers, J., Solomon, M. M.(2005)."Column Generation", Springer.
    [48] Dong, L., Kouvelis, P., Tian, Z.(2009)."Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Control of SubstituteProducts." Manufacturing&Service Operations Management11(2):317-339.
    [49] Draganska, M.,Klapper, D.(2010). Choice Set Heterogeneity and the Role of Advertising: AnAnalysis with Micro and Macro Data, Stanford Graduate School of Business Research PaperSeries No.2063
    [50] Drago, F., Kadar, D.(2007). Rebate or bait?"A model of regret and time inconsistency inconsumer behavior", C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers5757.
    [51] Elmaghraby, W., Gülcü, A., Keskinocak, P.(2008)."Designing Optimal PreannouncedMarkdowns in the Presence of Rational Customers with Multiunit Demands." Manufacturing&Service Operations Management10(1):126-148.
    [52] Elmaghraby, W., Keskinocak, P.(2003)."Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of InventoryConsiderations: Research Overview, Current Practices, and Future Directions." ManagementScience49(10):1287-1309.
    [53] Franses, P.H., Paap, R.(2001)."Quantitative Models in Marketing Research." CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge
    [54] Gallego, G., G.J. van Ryzin.(1994a)."Optimal dynamic pricing of inventories with stochasticdemand over finite horizons." Management Science40(8):999-1020.
    [55] Gallego, G., van Ryzin, G.(1994)."Optimal Dynamic Pricing of Inventories with StochasticDemand over Finite Horizons." Management Science40(8):999-1020.
    [56] Gallego, G., van Ryzin, G.(1997)."A Multiproduct Dynamic Pricing Problem and ItsApplications to Network Yield Management." Operations Research45(1):24-41.
    [57] Gensch, D. H(.1987)."A Two-Stage Disaggregate Attribute Choice Model." Marketing Science6(3):223-239.
    [58] Gigerenzer, G., Goldstein, D. G.(1996)."Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models ofBounded Rationality " Psychological Review103(4):650-669.
    [59] Gilbride, T. J., Allenby, G. M.(2004)."A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, andCompensatory Screening Rules." Marketing Science23(3):391-406.
    [60] Gino, F., Pisano, G.(2008)."Toward a Theory of Behavioral Operations." Manufacturing&Service Operations Management10(4):676-691.
    [61] Givon, M.(1984)."Variety seeking through brand switching." Marketing Science3(1):1-22.
    [62] Gourville, J. T.,Soman, D.(2005)."Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why VarietyBackfires." Marketing Science24(3):382-395.
    [63] Greenleaf, E., Lehmann, D.(1991)."Causes of Delay in Consumer Decision Making: AnExploratory Study." Advances in Consumer Research,18:470-475.
    [64] Greenleaf, E. A., Lehmann, D. R(.1995)."Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer DecisionMaking."Journal of Consumer Research22:186-199.
    [65] Hall, J. M., Kopalle, P. K., Pyke, D. F.(2009)."Static and Dynamic Pricing of Excess Capacityin a Make-to-Order Environment." Production and Operations Management18(4):411-425.
    [66] Hanson, W., Martin, K.(1996)."Optimizing multinomial logit profit functions." ManagementScience42(7):992-1003.
    [67] Hauser, J. R.(2011)."Consideration Set Heuristics." forthcoming, Judgment and DecisionMaking.
    [68] Hauser, J. R., Wernerfelt, B(.1990)."An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets." Journalof Consumer Research16(4):393-408.
    [69] Ho, T. H., Zhang, J.(2008)."Designing Pricing Contracts for Boundedly Rational Customers:Does the Framing of the Fixed Fee Matter?" Management Science54(4):686-700.
    [70] Hogarth, R. M., Karelaia, N.(2005)."Simple Models for Multiattribute Choice with ManyAlternatives: When It Does and Does Not Pay to Face Trade-offs with Binary Attributes."Management Science51(12):1860-1872.
    [71] Ho, T.H., N. Lim, C.F. Camerer.(2006)."Modeling the psychology of firm and consumerbehavior with behavioral economics." Journal of Marketing Research43:307-331.
    [72] Hopp, W. J., Xu, X.(2008)."A Static Approximation for Dynamic Demand Substitution withApplications in a Competitive Market." Operations Research56(3):630-645.
    [73] Hutchinson, J. W., Raman, K., Mantrala, M. K(.1994)."Finding Choice Alternatives in Memory:Probability Models of Brand Name Recall." Journal of Marketing Research31(4):441-461.
    [74] Iyengar, S., Lepper, M. R(.2000)."When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much ofa Good Thing?" J. Pers. Soc. Psych79:995-1006
    [75] Jeuland, A.P.(1979)."Brand choice inertia as one aspect of the notion of brand loyalty."Management Science25(7):671-682.
    [76] Kahn, B. E., Wansink, B.(2004)."The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Varietyand Consumption Quantities." J Consum Res30(4):519-533
    [77] Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.(1996)."On the Reality of Cognitive Illusions " PsychologicalReview103(3):582-591.
    [78] Katok, E., Thomas, D., Davis, A(.2008)."Inventory Service-Level Agreements as CoordinationMechanisms: The Effect of Review Periods." Manufacturing&Service Operations Management10(4):609-624.
    [79] Kimes, Sheryl E. and Paul E. Wagner.(2001).“Preserving your Revenue Management Systemas a Trade Secret,” Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly.42(5):8–15.
    [80] Klemperer, P.(1987a)."Markets with consumer switching costs." Quart. J. Econom102(1):375-394.
    [81] Klemperer, P(.1987b)."The competitiveness of markets with switching costs." Rand J. Econom.18(1):138-150.
    [82] K k, A. G., Fisher, M. L., Vaidyanathan, R., Agrawal, N.,Smith, S. A.(2009)."AssortmentPlanning: Review of Literature and Industry Practice". Retail Supply Chain Management. F. S.Hillier and C. C. Price, Springer US.122:99-153.
    [83] K k, A. G., Fisher, M. L.(2007)."Demand estimation and assortment optimization undersubstitution: methodology and application." Operations Research55(6):1001-1021.
    [84] Kumar, S., Sethi, S. P.(2009)."Dynamic pricing and advertising for web content providers."European Journal of Operational Research197(3):924-944.
    [85] Kwon, R. H., Anandalingam, G., Ungar, L. H.(2005)."Iterative Combinatorial Auctions withBidder-Determined Combinations." Management Science51(3):407-418.
    [86] Levin, Y., McGill, J., Nediak, M.(2009)."Optimal Dynamic Pricing of Perishable Items by aMonopolist Facing Strategic Consumers." Production and Operations Management.19(1):40-60.
    [87] Levin, Y., McGill, J., Nediak, M.(2009)."Dynamic pricing in the presence of strategicconsumers and oligopolistic competition." Management Science55(1)32-46.
    [88] Levina, T., Levin, Y., McGill, J., Nediak, M.(2009)."Dynamic Pricing with Online Learningand Strategic Consumers: An Application of the Aggregating Algorithm." Operations Research57(2):327-341.
    [89] Lew, A., Mauch, H.(2007). Dynamic Programming: A Computational Tool, Springer.
    [90] Lin, K. Y.(2006)."Dynamic pricing with real-time demand learning." European Journal ofOperational Research174(1):522-538.
    [91] Lin, K. Y., Sibdari, S. Y.(2009)."Dynamic price competition with discrete customer choices."European Journal of Operational Research197(3):969-980.
    [92] Liu, Q., van Ryzin, G.(2008)."On the Choice-Based Linear Programming Model for NetworkRevenue Management." Manufacturing&Service Operations Management10(2):288-310.
    [93] Liu, Q., van Ryzin, G. J. v.(2008)."Strategic Capacity Rationing to Induce Early Purchases."Management Science54(6):1115-1131.
    [94] Loch, C. H., Wu, Y.(2007)."Behavioral Operations Management." Foundations and Trends inTechnology, Information and Operations Management1(3):121-232.
    [95] Loch, C. H., Wu, Y.(2008)."Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance: AnExperimental Study." Management Science54(11):1835-1849.
    [96] Luce, R. D., Suppes, P(.1965)."Preference, utility and subjective probability." in: R. D. Luce, R.R. Bush, E. Galanter(Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Wiley, New York, pp.249-410.
    [97] Maglaras, C., Meissner, J.(2006)."Dynamic pricing strategies for multi-product revenuemanagement problem." Manufacturing&Service Operations Management8(2):136-148.
    [98] Mahajan, S., van Ryzin, G.(2001)."Stocking Retail Assortments Under Dynamic ConsumerSubstitution." Operations Research49(3):334-351.
    [99] Mantrala, M. K., Levy, M., Kahn, B. E., Fox, E. J., Gaidarev, P., Dankworth, B.,Shah, D(.2009)."Why is Assortment Planning so Difficult for Retailers? A Framework and Research Agenda."Journal of Retailing85(1):71-83.
    [100] Martignon, L., Hoffrage, U.(2002)."Fast, Frugal, and Fit: Simple Heuristics for PairedComparisons " Theory and Decision52:29-71.
    [101] Martignon, L., Schmitt, M.(1999)."Simplicity and Robustness of Fast and Frugal Heuristics "Minds and Machines9:565-593.
    [102] McAfee, R. P., Velde, V.(2008)."Dynamic Pricing with Constant Demand Elasticity."Production and Operations Management17(4):432-438.
    [103] Mehta, N., Rajiv, S., Srinivasan, K.(2003)."Price Uncertainty and Consumer Search: AStructural Model of Consideration Set Formation." Marketing Science22(1):58-84.
    [104] Meissner, J., Strauss, A. K.(2010)."Pricing structure optimization in mixedrestricted/unrestricted fare environments." Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management9:399-418.
    [105] Meissner, J., Strauss, A. K.(2010). Choice-Based Network Revenue Management under WeakMarket Segmentation, The Department of Management Science, Working paper, LancasterUniversity.1-27.
    [106] Min, D., Gaskin, S., Hauser, J. R.(2009). A Critical Review of Non-compensatory andCompensatory Models of Consideration-Set Decisions.(2009). Sawtooth Software ConferenceProceedings, Delray, FL, March23-27.
    [107] Miller, C. M., Smith, S. A., McIntyre, S. H., Achabal, D. D(.2010)."Optimizing and EvaluatingRetail Assortments for Infrequently Purchased Products." Journal of Retailing86(2):159-171.
    [108] Mitra, Anusree and John G. Lynch Jr.(1995),“Toward a Reconciliation of Market Power andInformation Theories of Advertising Effects on Price Elasticity,” Journal of Consumer Research,21(March),644–59.
    [109] Moe, W. W.(2006)."An Empirical Two-Stage Choice Model with Decision Rules Applied toInternet Clickstream Data." Journal of Marketing Research XLIII:680-692.
    [110] Moe, W. W., Fader, P. S.(2004)."Dynamic Conversion Behavior at E-Commerce Sites."Management Science50(3):326-335.
    [111] Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T.,Iyengar, S. S.(2008)."The Mere Categorization Effect: How thePresence of Categories Increases Choosers’ Perceptions of Assortment Variety and OutcomeSatisfaction." Journal of Consumer Research35(2):202-215.
    [112] Mookherjee, R., Friesz, T. L(.2008)."Pricing, Allocation, and Overbooking in Dynamic ServiceNetwork Competition When Demand Is Uncertain." Production and Operations Management17(4):455-474.
    [113] Morton, A(.2006)."Structural properties of network revenue management models: An economicperspective." Naval Research Logistics53(8):748-760.
    [114] Moshe Ben-Akiva, Boccara, B.(1995)."Discrete choice models with latent choice sets."International Journal of Research in Marketing12(1):9-24.
    [115] Mzoughi, N., Garrouch, K., Bouhlel, O., Negra, A(.2007)."Online Procrastination: A PredictiveModel." Journal of Internet Business(4):1-36.
    [116] Nedungadi, P.(1990)."Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice withoutAltering Brand Evaluations." Journal of Consumer Research17(3):263-276.
    [117] Netessine, S., Rudi, N.(2003)."Centralized and competitive inventory models with demandsubstitution." Operations Research51(2):329-335.
    [118] Netessine, S., Shumsky, R. A.(2005)."Revenue Management Games: Horizontal and VerticalCompetition." Management Science51(5):813-831.
    [119] Newell, B. R., Weston, N. J., Shanks, D. R.(2002)."Empirical Tests Of A Fast-And-FrugalHeuristic: Not Everyone "Takes-The-Best"." Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses91(82-96)
    [120] Newell, B. R., Weston, N. J., Shanks, D. R.(2003)."Take the Best or Look at the Rest? FactorsInfluencing "One-Reason" Decision Making " Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory and Cognition29(1):53-65.
    [121] Perakis, G., Roels, G.(2010)."Robust Controls for Network Revenue Management."Manufacturing&Service Operations Management12(1):56-76.
    [122] Petruzzi, N. C., Dada, M(.2002)."Dynamic pricing and inventory control with learning." NavalResearch Logistics49(3):303-325.
    [123] Plambeck, E. L., Wang, Q(.2011). Implications of Hyperbolic Discounting for Optimal Pricing,Scheduling and Information Management in Service Systems. Working paper. California,Stanford University.
    [124] Popescu, I., Wu, Y.(2007)."Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects." OperationsResearch55(3)413-429.
    [125] Rabin, M(.1998)."Psychology and economics." Journal of Economic Literature36(1):11-46.
    [126] Roberts, J. H., Lattin, J. M.(1991)."Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration SetComposition " Journal of Marketing Research28(4):429-440.
    [127] Roberts, J. H., Lattin, J. M.(1997)."Consideration: Review of Research and Prospects forFuture Insights " Journal of Marketing Research34(3):406-410.
    [128] Rubinstein, A.(1998). Modeling Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [129] Rusmevichientong, P., Shen, Z.-J. M., Shmoys, D. B.(2010)."Dynamic AssortmentOptimization with a Multinomial Logit Choice Model and Capacity Constraint." OperationsResearch58(6):1666-1680.
    [130] Rusmevichientong, P., Topaloglu, H.(2009). Technical Note: Robust Logit Assortments,Working paper, Cornell University.
    [131] Samu, S.,Shanker Krishnan, H.(2010)."Brand related information as context: the impact ofbrand name characteristics on memory and choice." Journal of the Academy of MarketingScience38(4):456-470.
    [132] Sarafidis, Y.(2004). Inter-temporal Price Discrimination with Time Inconsistent Consumers.Working paper, Yale University.
    [133] Schmitt, M., Martignon, L.(2006)."On the Complexity of Learning Lexicographic Strategies "Journal of Machine Learning Research7:55-83.
    [134] Seetharaman, P.B.(2009)."Dynamic pricing." in: V. R. Rao(Ed.), Handbook of PricingResearch In Marketing, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham,384-396.
    [135] Seetharaman, P. B., Che, H.(2009)."Price Competition in Markets with Consumer VarietySeeking." Marketing Science28(3):516-525.
    [136] Sela, A., Berger, J.,Liu, W.(2009)."Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size InfluencesOption Choice." Journal of Consumer Research35(6):941-951.
    [137] Shen, Z.-J., Su, X.(2007)."Customer behavior modeling in revenue management and auctions:A review and new research opportunities." Production and Operations Management16(6):713–728.
    [138] Shugan, S. M.(1980)."The Cost of Thinking." Journal of Consumer Research7(2):99-111.
    [139] Siddarth, S., Bucklin, R. E., Morrison, D. G(.1995)."Making the Cut: Modeling and AnalyzingChoice Set Restriction in Scanner Panel Data." Journal of Marketing Research32(3):255-266.
    [140] Simon, H.(1955)."A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice." Quarterly Journal of Economics69(1):99-118
    [141] Simon, H. A.(1982). Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [142] Smith, S. A., Agrawal, N.(2000)."Management of multi-item retail inventory systems withdemand substitution." Operations Research48(1):50-64.
    [143] Song, J.-S., Xue, Z.(2007)."Demand Management and Inventory Control for SubstitutableProducts". Durham, NC27708, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.
    [144] Song, Y., Ray, S., Boyaci, T(.2009)."Technical Note--Optimal Dynamic Joint Inventory-PricingControl for Multiplicative Demand with Fixed Order Costs and Lost Sales." OperationsResearch57(1):245-250.
    [145] Su, X.(2007)."Intertemporal Pricing with Strategic Customer Behavior." Management Science53(5):726-741.
    [146] Su, X.(2008)."Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models." Manufacturing&ServiceOperations Management10(4):566-589.
    [147] Su, X.(2009)."A Model of Consumer Inertia with Applications to Dynamic Pricing."Production and Operations Management18(4):365-380.
    [148] Talluri, K., van Ryzin, G.(2004)."Revenue Management Under a General Discrete ChoiceModel of Consumer Behavior." Management Science50(1):15-33.
    [149] Talluri, K. T., Ryzin, G. J. v., Eds.(2005)."The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management."Norwell, MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [150] Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.(1974)."Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases."Science185:1124-1131
    [151] Todd, P. M., Group, t. A. R.(1999)."Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart." Oxford, UK,Oxford University Press
    [152] Transchel, S., Minner, S.(2009)."The impact of dynamic pricing on the economic orderdecision." European Journal of Operational Research198(3):773-789.
    [153] Tsai, W.-H., Hung, S.-J.(2009)."Dynamic pricing and revenue management process in Internetretailing under uncertainty: An integrated real options approach." Omega37(2):471-481.
    [154] Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.(1974)."Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases."Science185(4157):1124-1131.
    [155] Vaidyanathan, R. Fisher, M.(2004). Assortment optimization. Working paper. The WhartonSchool. University of Pennsylvania.
    [156] van Eerde, W.(2003)."A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination."Personality and Individual Differences35:1401–1418.
    [157] van Hooft, E. A. J., Born, M. P., Blonk, R. W. B., Taris, T. W., van de Flier, H(.2005)."Bridgingthe gap between intentions and behavior: Implementation intentions, action control, andprocrastination." Journal of Vocational Behavior66:238-256.
    [158] van Ryzin, G., Mahajan, S.(1999)."On the relationship between inventory costs and varietybenefits in retail assortments." Management Science45(11)1496-1509.
    [159] van Ryzin, G., Vulcano, G(.2008)."Simulation-Based Optimization of Virtual Nesting Controlsfor Network Revenue Management." Operations Research56(4):865-880.
    [160] Vermeulen, I. E.,Seegers, D.(2009)."Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews onconsumer consideration." Tourism Management30(1):123-127.
    [161] Wang, X., Wang, F.(2007)."Dynamic network yield management." Transportation ResearchPart B: Methodological41(4):410-425.
    [162] Webster, S.(2002)."Dynamic Pricing and Lead-Time Policies for Make-to-Order Systems."Decision Sciences33(4):579-600.
    [163] Wernerfelt, B.(1991)."Brand loyalty and market equilibrium."Marketing Science10(3):229-245.
    [164] Wertenbroch, K.(2001). Self-Rationing: Self-Control in Consumer Choice. INSEAD.
    [165] Wertenbroch, K.(2003). Self-Rationing: Self-Control in Consumer Choice, in: G.Loewenstein,D. Read, R. Baumeister(Eds.), Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectiveson Intertemporal Choice, Russel Sage Foundation, New York,491-516.
    [166] Wu, J., Rangaswamy, A.(2003)."A Fuzzy Set Model of Search and Consideration with anApplication to an Online Market." Marketing Science22(3):411-434.
    [167] Wu, Y., Ramachandran, K., Krishnan, V(.2009). Managing Projects with Present-Biased Agents.Working paper, National University of Singapore.
    [168] Xia, C. H., Dube, P.(2007)."Dynamic Pricing in e-Services under Demand Uncertainty."Production and Operations Management16(6):701-712.
    [169] Xu, X., Hopp, W. J.(2004). Dynamic pricing and inventory control with demand substitution:The value of pricing flexibility. Evanston, IL, Department of Industrial Engineering,Northwestern University.
    [170] Yee, R. W. Y., Yeung, A. C. L., Cheng, T. C. E(.2008)."The impact of employee satisfaction onquality and profitability in high-contact service industries." Journal of Operations Management26(5):651-668.
    [171] Yoo, C. Y.(2008)."Unconscious processing of Web advertising: Effects on implicit memory,attitude toward the brand, and consideration set." Journal of Interactive Marketing22(2):2-18.
    [172] Zhang, Z.J., Krishna, A., Dhar, S. K.(2000)."The optimal choice of promotional vehicles:Front-loaded or rear-loaded incentives?"Management Science46(3):348-362.
    [173] Zhou, Z., Li, Y., Tang, K.(2009)."Dynamic pricing and warranty policies for products withfixed lifetime." European Journal of Operational Research196(3):940-948.
    [174]戴道明,杨善林(2009)."动态定价与允许需求延迟订货批量模型的联合决策."管理工程学报23(04):116-120.
    [175]杜荣,胡奇英,魏轶华(2003)."两方竞争情况下产品动态定价研究."管理工程学报1(701):20-24.
    [176]高峻峻,倪璐伊,刘悦.考虑品类规划与库存控制的促销规划仿真分析[J].统计与决策,2012,(1):40-45.
    [177]高峻峻,孟志青.品种选择、货架分配与库存控制的联合决策模型[J].系统工程学报,2009,24(5):614-620.
    [178]官振中,任建标(2011)."不确定性需求易逝性高科技产品收益管理定价策略."系统工程学报26(01):30-37.
    [179]官振中,陈旭,卜祥智,史本山(2006)."易逝性高科技产品收益管理资源分配及定价策略."系统工程24(01):23-29.
    [180]官振中,史本山(2007)."基于顾客选择模型易逝性产品收益管理订购和定价策略."系统工程理论与实践27(09):47-53.
    [181]官振中,史本山(2008)."易逝性高科技产品收益管理定价策略."管理科学学报11(05):102-109.
    [182]郭哲,汪定伟,吴俊新(2006)."电子商务中竞争环境下的耐用品动态定价模型."系统仿真学报18(11):3046-3049+3054.
    [183]李根道,熊中楷,聂佳佳(2009)."库存和价格影响需求的易逝品动态定价."系统管理学报18(04):402-409.
    [184]李豪,熊中楷,彭庆(2010)."基于乘客选择行为的双航班竞争动态定价模型."工业工程13(02):86-90+124.
    [185]李豪,熊中楷,彭志强(2011)."竞争环境下基于顾客策略行为的易逝品动态定价研究."中国管理科学19(2):88-98.
    [186]李晓花,萧柏春(2004)."航空公司收入管理价格与舱位控制的统一分析."管理科学学报7(06):63-69+93.
    [187]刘晓峰(2007)."易逝品的动态定价机制与消费者策略行为研究."博士论文,上海交通大学.
    [188]刘晓峰(2008)."策略型消费者的动态定价机制与返还合同设计."中南财经政法大学学报(03):128-133.
    [189]刘晓峰,徐贤浩(2011)."消费者策略行为视角下短生命周期产品的定价机制研究."中国管理科学19(4):152-158.
    [190]罗利,彭际华(2007)."竞争环境下的民航客运收益管理动态定价模型."系统工程理论与实践27(11):15-25.
    [191]罗利,俞言兵,刘德文(2006)."基于需求转移的易逝性产品最优动态定价策略."管理工程学报20(02):38-42.
    [192]彭志强,熊中楷,李根道(2010)."考虑策略性顾客的动态定价和差价返还机制."管理工程学报24(04):53-57.
    [193]申成霖,张新鑫(2011)."混合型消费者的短生命周期产品动态定价."工业工程14(1):38-52.
    [194]熊中楷,李豪,彭志强(2010)."竞争环境下季节性产品网上直销动态定价模型."系统工程理论与实践30(02):243-250.
    [195]熊中楷,李豪,向东(2007)."需求函数为非线性的按订单生产厂商动态定价的特性研究."科技管理研究27(05):128-131.
    [196]熊中楷,聂佳佳,李根道(2008)."考虑广告影响下的新产品垄断动态定价研究."管理学报5(06):849-855.
    [197]杨慧,周晶,宋华明(2010)."考虑消费者短视和策略行为的动态定价研究."管理工程学报24(04):133-137.
    [198]张勇,路应金,杨洪(2007)."基于电子化供应链管理的动态定价数学模型的研究."成都理工大学学报(自然科学版)34(06):634-638.
    [199]钟宁,田澎(2007)."基于动态定价理论的退票费率设计."上海交通大学学报41(12):1993-2000.
    [200] http://www.360buy.com/products/737-794-798-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-1-1-1-2-78-33.html

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700