开放式证券投资基金业绩评价研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
自1999年3月我国第一批规范的证券投资基金上市以来,证券投资基金业在规模、产品的品种、法律法规和监管体系建设等方面都得到了迅速的发展,成为我国证券市场的重要组成部分。随着投资基金业的发展,其业绩表现便受到基金管理层、基金管理公司、基金投资者以及学者们的普遍关注。投资基金能否体现出专家理财的能力,是否具有超越市场的业绩等都成为人们关注的焦点,导致对投资基金业绩进行客观全面的评价成为当前研究的热点。相对而言,国内对投资基金业绩评价的理论研究与实践起步较晚,评价的理论和方法大多是借用国外成熟的理论,在实践的过程中多为直接借用国外的评价模型,较少考虑到国内的实际,在评价方法应用的深度、广度以及系统性等方面均存在着一些不足。
     本文根据证券投资基金业绩评价理论,综合运用多元统计学,计量经济学,非参数理论,采用理论分析和实证分析相结合的方法,对我国投资基金的业绩进行了较为全面、系统的综合性分析和评价。论文首先回顾了与基金业绩评价有关的经典理论和评价方法,对研究成果进行了归纳总结和相应的评价,在此基础上,对投资基金的未经风险调整业绩、经风险调整的业绩、经理人选股与择时能力、业绩持续性、业绩综合定量评价等进行了理论的阐述和实证分析。论文将基金指数收益率与市场指数收益率进行对比分析,利用协整理论、因果关系理论和状态方程模型分析了类型基金指数与市场指数的关系;利用非参数密度估计理论、分位数回归方法等计算出7种经风险调整的业绩指标,并以此指标对投资基金业绩的表现、指标评价结果的相关性进行了实证分析;利用面板数据模型中的似不相关参数估计方法对投资基金经理人的选股与择时能力进行了实证分析;利用横截面回归、列联表分析法、Spearman等级相关检验和游程检验法对投资基金业绩持续性进行了检验;利用全局主成分和全局熵权分析法和对应分析法对投资基金综合业绩进行了定量评价。实证结果表明,开放式基金的收益高于市场收益,但在特定的时间段表现各异;基金市场与证券市场之间的密切程度越来越高;投资基金具有较为显著的选股能力但市场时机把握能力不显著;基金在多种分析时期下不具有显著的业绩持续性。本论文的研究更具系统性、广泛性和综合性,对各个机构和投资者具有参考价值。
     该论文有图17幅,表77个,参考文献147篇。
Since China's first canonical listed securities investment fund in March 1999, securities investment fund industry has been developed rapidly in terms of scale, product variety, laws, regulations and regulatory system construction and other aspects, and has become an important group of China's securities market . With the development of investment fund industry, its performance will be general concerned by fund managers, fund management companies, fund investors and scholars. Whether investment funds could reflect the capacity of financial experts and whether they exceed the performance of the market have become the focus of attention. By contrast, theoretical research and practical application of performance evaluation have a late start in china, and the theories and methods of evaluation are borrowed mostly from abroad. In practice, the process often comes directly from foreign evaluation model without taking the domestic reality into account. There are some drawbacks in evaluation methods applied in the breadth, depth and systemic aspects.
     With the investment fund performance evaluation of existing theories, we have integrated existing multiple statistics, econometrics, non-parametric theory, used a combination of theoretical analysis and empirical analysis methods, and conducted a more comprehensive and systematic analysis and evaluation of the performance of investment funds in China. The paper firstly reviews the classical theory and evaluation methods related to the performance evaluation of the Fund, research results are summarized and the corresponding evaluation is done. On this basis, theoretical elaboration and empirical analysis are made about the investment funds without the risk-adjusted performance, risk-adjusted performance, managers stock picking and timing capabilities, Performance Persistence, performance of a comprehensive quantitative evaluation. The paper compares the fund index yield and the market index yield, and analyses the relationship between the type fund index and market index using cointegration theory, causal theory and equation of state model; we use non-parametric density estimation theory and quantile regression method to calculate the seven kinds of risk-adjusted performance indicators, and use the indicators of the performance of investment fund to analyse it empirically and evaluate the performance and relevance of the results; we use seemingly unrelated parameter estimation method of panel data model to empirically analyse the Investment Fund manager's stock selection and timing ability; Investment Fund Performance Persistence is tested by cross-sectional regression, contingency table analysis, Spearman rank correlation test and runs test method; a comprehensive performance of investment funds is evaluated by the global principal components and global entropy power analysis and correspondence analysis; the factors affecting the performance of investment funds are analysed with the help of hierarchical linear models and principal component analysis method. The empirical results show that open-ended ends income is higher than market returns, but the performance of a specific period of time varies; fund markets have increasingly close relationship with the stock market; Investment funds have a more significant stock-picking ability but the market timing capability is not significant; Funds do not have a significant performance sustainability when they are in a variety of analysis time. Study of this paper is more systematic, extensive and comprehensive, and gives various institutions and investors a reference value.
引文
[1]证券投资基金编写组.证券投资基金[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002,6.
    [2]刘振亚主编.美国共同基金[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003,12.
    [3]中国银河证券基金研究中心.中国证券投资基金2008年行业统计报告. http://www.chinastock.com.cn
    [4]中国证券监督管理委员会网站.http://www.csrc.gov.cn/n575458/index.html
    [5]陈灵著.我国开放式基金问题研究[M].北京:光明出版社,2003,9.
    [6]蒋英琨.我国证券投资基金评价研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文.2005.
    [7]张亦春,郑振龙主编.金融市场学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003,6.
    [8]吴重逢,倪苏云等.证券投资基金绩效评价研究述评[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002(10):128-133.
    [9] Friend I, F. E. Brown, E. S. Herman, D. Vickers. A study of mutual funds[M]. U.S government printing office. Washington D.C. 1962.
    [10] Treynor Jack. How to rate management of investment funds[J].Harvard Business Review, 1965(1):63-75.
    [11] William F. Sharp.Mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Bushiness ,1966(39):119-138.
    [12] Michael C.Jensen. The performance of Mutual Fund in the period 1945-1964[J].Journal of Finance,1968(23):389-419.
    [13] Modigliani F, Mordigliani L. Risk-adjusted performance [J]. Journal of Portfolio Management, 1997 23(2): 45-54.
    [14] Treynor Jack, Black F. How to use security analysis to improve selection[J]. Journal of Business, 1973(46): 66-86.
    [15] Sortino, F., R. van der Meer. Downside Risk[J]. Journal of Portfolio Management, 1991(4): 27-31.
    [16] Muralidhar,A. S. Risk-adjusted performance: the correlation correction. Financial Analysts Journal, 2000(56): 63-71.
    [17] Michael Stutzer. A portfolio performance index[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2000 (May / June): 52-61.
    [18] Lehman, B. N.,& Modest, D. M. Mutual fund performance evaluation: a comparison of benchmarks and benchmark comparisons[J]. Journal of Finance, 1987,42(2):233-265.
    [19] Fama Eugene, F. Kenneth, R. French. Common risk factors in the returns on bonds and stocks[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993(33): 3-53.
    [20] Fama Eugene F, Kenneth R. French. Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies[J]. Journal of Finance, 1996(51): 55-84.
    [21] Carhart M. Persistence in mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Finance,1997, 52 (1): 57-82.
    [22] Treynor D E, Mazuy K. Can mutual funds outguess the market[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1966, 17:33-36.
    [23] Henriksson, R. D., Merton, R. C. On market timing and investment performance. II. Statistical procedures for evaluating forecasting skills[J]. Journal of Business. 1981, 54(4): 513-533.
    [24] Chang E C, Lewellen W C. Market timing and mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Business, 1984, 57:57-72.
    [25] Fama Eugene F, Kenneth R. French. Common risk factors in the returns on bonds and stocks[J]. Journal of Financial Economics. 1993(33): 3-53.
    [26] Carlson R.S. Aggregate performance of mutual funds, 1948-1967[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1970(5): 1-32.
    [27] Grinblatt Mark, Sheridan Titman. The persistence of mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Finance, 1992, 47(5): 1977-1984.
    [28] Goetzmann, W., Roger, G. Ibbotoson. Do winners repeat? Patterns in mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Portfolio Management, 1994(20): 9-18.
    [29] Malkiel,B.G. Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971-1991[J]. Journal of Finance, 1995(50): 549-572.
    [30] Brown Stephen J, Goetzmann, W. N. Performance persistence[J]. Journal of Finance.1995, 50(2): 679-698.
    [31]石磊,王毅捷.新基金的绩效分析[J].预测,1999(5):38-42.
    [32]王茂斌.中国证券投资基金绩效评估[J].证券市场导报,1999(12).
    [33]徐涵江.证券投资基金经营绩效评价研究及其实证分析[J].统计研究,2000(4):76-82.
    [34]沈维涛,黄兴孪.我国证券投资基金绩效的实证分析与评价[J].经济研究,2001(9):59-64.
    [35]万朝领等.证券投资基金绩效评价基准研究[J].上证联合研究计划2001卷,上海证券交易所,2001(8).
    [36]刘霞.证券投资基金绩效评价方法及实证分析[J].商业研究,2005(5):76-79.
    [37]张婷,李凯.证券投资基金投资绩效分析[J].预测,2000(1):45-50.
    [38]刘红忠等.证券投资基金绩效评估与风险度量的卖证分析[J],上证联合研究计划2001卷,上海证券交易所,2001(8).
    [39]姚兴涛等.证券投资基金时机选择能力的实证研究[J],证券市场导报,2001(12):16-21.
    [40]吴世农,李培标.中国投资基金证券选择和时机选择能力的实证研究[J].经济管理,2002(4):P65-70.
    [41]于谨.我国证券投资基金绩效归因分析的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2004(9):34-40.
    [42]郑慧清,王尤.我国证券投资基金择时选股能力的实证分析[J].经济问题,2002(5):68-72.
    [43]王金田,陆旭先.证券投资基金选股和择机能力的实证分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2004(1): 25-29.
    [44]周泽炯,史本山.我国开放式基金选股能力和择时能力的实证研究[J].财贸研究,2004(06).
    [45]肖奎喜,杨义群.我国开放式基金的证券选择和市场时机把握能力研究[J].中央财经大学学报, 2005(1).
    [46]傅安里,马超群,杨晓光.证券投资基金波动择时能力研究[J].当代财经,2005(1):53-57.
    [47]胡畏,张明.基于持股数据的基金择股能力评价[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006(9):26-32.
    [48]刘建桥,陈方正,孙文全.基于时变的我国开放式基金选股和择时能力定量分析[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007(2)
    [49]杨湘豫,谭国威.开放式基金经理与热手的实证研究[j].系统工程,2007(6):46-48.
    [50]杨湘豫,吴许文,Gautam Mitra.开放式基金在上升市场与下降市场中选时与选股能力的实证研究[J].财经理论与实践. 2007(05):66-68.
    [51]刘红忠等.证券投资基金绩效评估与风险度量的实证分析[J].上证联合研究计划2001卷,上海证券交易所,2001年8月.
    [52]李博、吴世农.基金绩效评价的实证研究[J].证券市场导报,2001(8):P25-30.
    [53]张兆国,康自强,宁健武.中国证券投资基金盈利能力持续性实证研究[J].经济评论,2004(4):108-112.
    [54]赵旭,吴冲锋.证券投资基金绩效与持续性评价的实证研究——基于DEA模型与R/S模型的评价[J].管理科学,2004(8):47-52.
    [55]刘月珍,杨义群.我国证券投资基金业绩评价体系及综合评价方法研究[J].商业研究,2002(3):118-119.
    [56]刘芳,唐小我,马永开.对我国投资基金业绩进行评价的实证研究[J].运筹与管理,2003(2):54-60.
    [57]龙子泉,赵红艳.中国证券投资基金绩效实证研究[J].统计与决策2005(2).
    [58]王守法,我国证券投资基金绩效的研究与评价[J].经济研究,2005(3):107-109
    [59]赵中秋,陈倩,李金林.基于多元分析法的我国开放式基金绩效评价[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005(3).
    [60]赵承黎,康卫星,袁锋军.我国开放式基金业绩评价研究——基于因子分析和DEA模型的实证考察[J].新西部(下半月),2007(7):12-15.
    [61]李凯,史金艳.我国证券投资基金非系统性风险分析[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2003(5).
    [62]恢光平,褚艳辉.VaR模型与证券投资基金的风险管理[J].市场周刊,2003(9).
    [63]李继祥.VaR及对证券投资基金的VaR测算[J].重庆工商大学学报(西部经济论坛),2003(2).
    [64]孟海亮.VaR我国证券投资评价中的应用[J].北京工业大学学报,2004(12).
    [65]韩立岩.证券投资基金风险平衡能力评价管理研究.技术经济研究,2004(4).
    [66]黄福广.证券投资基金评级理论与方法[M],中国财经出版社,2005(11):25-75.
    [67]张晓峒.计量经济分析[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
    [68]王少平,曾庆龄.单整和协整的检验与再检验及其应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1999(11).
    [69]戴彬,崔宁.单位根检验的势和检验式的选择[J].统计与决策,2006(12).
    [70]赵松山,白雪梅.经济计量模型的选择[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2003(1).
    [71] ENGLE,ROBERT F, GRANGER C W J. Co-integration and Error Correction[J].Econometrica. 1987(55):76-251.
    [72]孙青华,张世英.长记忆向量时间序列的非线性协整关系研究[J].天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2002(3).
    [73]程细玉,张世英.向量分整序列的协整研究[J].系统工程学报,2000(3).
    [74]刘基良,徐全智.时间序列协整关系的存在性及检验方法[J].科技信息(学术研究),2008(9).
    [75]庞皓,陈述云.格兰杰因果检验的有效性及其应用[J].统计研究,1999(11).
    [76]周建,李子奈.Granger因果关系检验的适用性[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004(3).
    [77]陈雄兵,张宗成.再议Granger因果检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008(1).
    [78]曹永福.格兰杰因果性检验评述[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006(1).
    [79]高铁梅.计量经济分析方法与建模-Eviews应用及案例[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
    [80] Harvey,A,D.Forecasting,Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter[J]. Cambridge University Press,1989,Chapter3,4.
    [81]张志林.因果关系的状态空间模型.自然辩证法通讯,1996(1).
    [82]孟利锋,张世英,何信.SV模型参数估计的经验特征函数方法[J].系统工程,2004(12).
    [83]于艳萍,郭鹏辉,梁伟,钱争鸣.基于状态空间模型的经济分析[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2006(1).
    [84]邹健.含时变矩阵的状态空间模型估计与预测[J].南京信息工程大学,2006.
    [85]王婧,易丹辉.基于状态空间模型的股票市场的羊群行为[J].统计与决策,2006(18).
    [86]韩冬梅,刘兰娟,曹坤.基于状态空间模型的房地产价格泡沫问题研究[J].财经研究, 2008(1).
    [87]刘海燕,赵联文.非参数估计中核估计的构造及相合性[J].西南交通大学学报(自然科学版), 1999(3).
    [88]胡舒合,陈明华,方红.一般形式的密度估计[J].系统科学与数学,2005(2).
    [89]屈文建,熊国经.非参数密度估计法比较分析及应用[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2008(4).
    [90]刘向丽,成思危,汪寿阳,洪永淼.参数法、半参数法和非参数法计算我国铜期货市场VaR之比较[J].管理评论,2008(6).
    [91]龚金国,李竹渝.非参数核密度估计与Copula[J].数理统计与管理,2009(1).
    [92] KOENKER.R,BASSETT G J.Regression Quantiles[J].Econometrica,1978(46):33-50.
    [93] KOENKER R,OREY V.A Remark on Computing Regression Quantiles[J].Applied Statistics,1993(43):410-414.
    [94] PORTNOY S.KOENKER R.The Gaussian Hare and the Laplacian Tortoise:Computability of Squared-error Versus Absolute error Estimators[J].Statistical Science,1997(12):279-300.
    [95]陈建宝,丁军军.分位数回归技术综述[J].统计与信息论坛,2008(3).
    [96] Koenker R, Orey D. Computing regression quantiles[J]. Applied Statistics,1993(43):410-414.
    [97]李育安.分位数回归即应用简介[J].统计与信息论坛,2006(5):35-38.
    [98]李子奈.高等计量经济学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002:132-154.
    [99]朱平芳.现代计量经济学[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2004:194-200.
    [100] Hausman J A, Specification Tests in Econometrics 1978:1252-1272.
    [101] Zellner A. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias[J]. J.Am.Statist.Assoc,1962(57):348-368.
    [102] Zellner A. Estimators for seemingly unrelated regression equations: some exact finite sample results[J].J. Am.Statist. Assoc, 1963(58):977-982.
    [103] Goldberger A.A course in econometrics. Cambridge[J], MA:Harvard University Press,323
    [104]唐守正,李勇.生物数学模型的统计学基础[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.
    [105] Virendra SK.and David GEA.Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations Models: Eestimation and Inference[J]. Marcel Dekker, New York,1987.
    [106] Theil H. Principles of Econometrics. Wiley[J]. New York,1971:238-239.
    [107] Srivastava VK. and Maekawa K. Efficiency properties of feasible generalized least squares estimators in SURE models under non-normal disturbances[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1995(66):99-121。
    [108] Cameron AC. and Trivedi PK.Tests of independence in parametric models with applications and illustrations[J]. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1993(11):29-43.
    [109] Greene WH. Econometric Analysis, 4th edition[M]. Prentice Hall,Inc.,2000.
    [110] Breusch TS. and Pagan AR. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics[J]. Review of Economic Studies,1980(47):239-254.
    [111] Kariya T.Locally best invariant tests for independence between seemingly unrelated regression eauations[J]. Ann. Statist.1981(9):381-390.
    [112] Shiba T. and Tsurumi H. Bayesian and non-Bayesian tests of independence in seemingly unrelated regressions[J].Tnternational Economic Review 1988(29):377-389.
    [113] McElroy M. Goodness of fit for seemingly unrelated regressions: Glahn's R2 and Hooper's r-2[J].Journal of econometrics,1977(6):381-387.
    [114] Judge G.,Hill C.,Griffiths W.and Lee T. The theory and practice of econometrics[J]. NewYork: John Wiley and Sons, 1985.
    [115] Christopherson J A, Ferson W E. Conditioning manager alphas on economic informat ion: another look at the persistence of performance[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 1998(11):111-142.
    [116] Malkiel,B.G. Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971-199[J]1.Joumal of Finance,1995,50:549-572
    [117]何晓群.现代统计分析方法与应用[M].北京:人民大学出版社.1998.
    [118]徐国祥.管理统计学[M]。上海:上海财经大学出版社。
    [119]刘顺忠,荣丽敏,景丽芳.非参数统计和SPSS软件应用[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2008.
    [120] Goetzmann,W.N.,Ibbotson,R,G.D.winners repeat? Patterns in mutual fund performance[J].Journal of Portfolio Management,1994(20):9-17.
    [121] Grinblatt,M.,Titman,S.1994.The Persistence of mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Finance 47,1977-1984.
    [122]吴启芳,陈收,雷辉.基金业绩持续性的回归实证[J].系统工程,2003(1).
    [123]吴启芳,汪寿阳,黎建强.中国证券投资基金业绩的持续性检验[J].管理评论,2003(11).
    [124]胡畏,聂曙光,张明.中国证券投资基金业绩的中短期持续性[J].系统工程,2004(4).
    [125]李德辉,方兆本证券投资基金业绩持续性研究综述[J].证券市场导报,2005(8).
    [126]李宪立,吴光伟,唐衍伟.多期基金业绩持续性评价新模型及实证研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2007(10).
    [127]王向阳,袁定.开放式基金业绩持续性的实证研究[J].统计与决策,2006(1):137-138.
    [128]何晓群,郝燕梅.开放式基金业绩持续性检测的实证研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2008(5):46-50.
    [129]陈衍泰,陈国宏,李美娟.综合评价方法分类及研究进展[J].管理科学学报,2004(2):69-79.
    [130]任若恩,王惠文.多元统计数据分析—理论、方法、案例[M].北京:国防工业出版社,20004
    [131]郭存芝,陈红兵.证券投资风险的熵权系数评价方法研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002(5).
    [132]饶扬德.企业经营绩效的熵权系数评价方法及其应用[J].工业技术经济,2004(8).
    [133]周屏.基于多元统计分析的开放式基金业绩评价[J].湖南文理学院学报(自然科学版),2006(9):21-25.
    [134]熊婷燕.主成分分析与型因子分析的异同比较[J].统计与决策2006(1):129-232.
    [135]张东云,林秀梅.我国上市证券投资基金经营状况的因子分析[J].工业技术经济2004(6).
    [136]徐义田,王来生,崔文善,张好治.核主成分分析(KPCA)在企业经济效益评价中的应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2006(1):35-38.
    [137]薛觉民,韩春琏.对应分析应用中的量纲问题[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版),1997(4).
    [138]曾道明,纪宏金,高文,刘强.R-Q型因子分析与对应分析[J]物探化探计算技术,2008(1):78-81.
    [139]张彦,曹晓丽.对应分析在Eviews中的实现[J].计算机与现代化,2005(3):103-106.
    [140]童亚丽,张扬文.关于对应分析中量纲问题的处理[J].大众科技,2005(4):154-156.
    [141]郭存芝.股票投资价值的熵权系数评价方法研究[J].南开经济研究,2001(5).
    [142]陈孝新.熵权法在股票市场的应用[J].商业研究,2004(16):139-144.
    [143]陈爱学.建立本土化基金评价业刘传葵[J].资本市场, 2003(12):44-47.
    [144]胡晓薇,杨文超.关于发展证券投资基金的几点看法[J].现代管理科学, 2006(08):76-77.
    [145]贺京同,徐小兵.我国开放式基金发展面临的问题及对策[J].经济纵横, 2007(15):22-24.
    [146]崔惠芳中美开放式基金的发展现状对比与启示[J].生产力研究,2007(18):95-98.
    [147]邢雷.我国证券投资基金的现状及对策研究[J].四川经济管理学院学报,2007(02):42-44

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700