公司治理对我国上市公司自愿性信息披露影响的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
自愿性信息披露是在强制性信息披露的规范以外,上市公司主动向公众提供公司相关信息。自愿性信息披露是强制性信息披露的补充和扩展,能够提高公司的透明度,降低信息不对称性,保护投资者和利益相关者的利益,对于上市公司,投资者、利益相关者和整个证券市场都有重要意义。但是,我国上市公司最近几年才开始披露自愿性信息,虽然有逐年上升趋势,但是其水平还是很低下,还有很大的上升空间。因此,怎样提高上市公司自愿性信息披露水平成为了一个颇具现实意义的问题。除了外部经济环境以外,影响自愿性信息披露水平的关键性因素是上市公司的公司治理。因此,本文采用理论研究和实证研究相结合的研究方法来分析论证公司治理对我国上市公司自愿性信息披露的影响,以期从完善公司治理和信息披露制度的角度提出提高自愿性信息披露的水平建议,提高我国上市公司自愿性信息披露水平,从而提高上市公司信息质量。
     本文共分四个部分。第一部分为导论部分,提出了本文的研究背景、意义及内容。第二部分,归纳、比较和分析了中外学者在自愿性信息披露方面的研究成果,以此作为本文研究的基础。第三部分界定了公司治理和自愿性信息披露的定义,并从理论上分析公司治理对自愿性信息披露的影响。本文认为公司治理与自愿性信息披露存在着互补效应,即公司治理越完善,自愿性信息披露的水平就越高。第四部分实证研究了公司治理对我国上市公司自愿性信息披露的影响。依据理论研究,本文提出股权结构和董事会特征两方面的解释变量,包括股权集中度、控股股东性质、机构投资者持股比例、监事会持股人数比例、两职合一状态、独立董事比例以及独立董事参与度,同时将公司规模、盈利能力、上市地点作为控制变量。而后利用2007年只发行A股的机械行业156家上市公司作为研究对象,采用多元线性回归实证研究方法对假设进行验证。研究发现控股股东性质(国有股)以及独立董事参与度与自愿性信息披露水平显著正相关,监事会持股人数比例与自愿性信息披露水平有微弱的正相关关系,而股权集中度、机构投资者持股比例、两职合一状态以及独立董事比例与自愿性信息披露的相关性并不显著。第五部分,依据理论和实证分析,提出建设性的意见。本文主要提出了优化上市公司股权结构、完善董事会和监事会以及完善信息披露制度的意见,以期提高自愿性信息披露的水平。
Voluntary disclosure can be defined as disclosure providing the public with related information in the excess of requirements. Voluntary disclosure is the supplement and extension of mandatory disclosure, capable of improving the transparency of companies, eliminating the information asymmetry between the internal and the external, protecting investors and interest parties, and meaningful to investors, interest parties, security market as well as listed companies. However, listed companies in China only began to disclose information voluntarily very recently which is of low quality. Hence, it becomes a quite practical problem how to improve voluntary disclosure of listed companies in China. And the critical factor influencing the voluntary disclosure, besides the external economic environment, is corporate governance. So the paper examines the influence of corporate governance on voluntary disclosure empirically and theoretically in order to improve the voluntary disclosure and information quality of listed companies in China by making some suggestions about corporate governance and information disclosure.
     The paper is composed of mainly 5 sections. Firstly, the paper brings forward the background and significance of the subject. Secondly, I sum up, compare and analyze studies about voluntary disclosure by scholars abroad and at home which can be considered as the foundation of my research. Thirdly, the paper states definition of voluntary disclosure and corporate governance, and analyzes the influence of corporate governance on voluntary disclosure theoretically. There is complementary relationship between corporate governance and voluntary disclosure, which means more perfect the corporate governance is, the better voluntary disclosure will be. Furthermore, the paper makes an empirical study on influence to voluntary disclosure by corporate governance. Based on theoretical analysis, the attributes of ownership structure and features of the board of directors are set up, including ownership concentration, controlling ownership identity, the proportion of institutional investor ownership, the proportion of shareholding supervisors to the total number of supervisors on the board, CEO duality, the proportion of independent directors to the total number of directors on the board and participation of independent directors. Meanwhile, 3 controlling variables are set up, including company size, profitability and the market. The study is based on a sample of 156 listed companies in machinery industry which only have A-shares on either Shanghai or Shenzhen Stock Exchange. Then a linear multiple regression equation is established to test the conjecture. The result indicates that controlling ownership identity, participation of independent directors relate notably to voluntary disclosure positively, and the proportion of shareholding supervisors to the total number of supervisors on the board relate weakly to voluntary disclosure positively. The correlation between other independent variables and dependent variable is insignificant. Finally, based on theoretical and empirical research, some advises are provided mainly including the improvement of ownership structure, board of directors, board of supervisors and disclosure systems.
引文
[1] Botosan, C.A. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, 1997, 72(3) : 323-350
    [2] Chau, G. K., Gray, S. J. Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting,2002,37:247-265
    [3] Bens A.,Monahan.J. Disclosure quality and the excess value of diversification. Journal of Accounting Research, 2004,42(4):691-730
    [4] Healy. P.M., Palepu. K.G. The challenges of investor communications: the case of CUC International, Inc. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, 38: 111-141
    [5] Myers, S., Majluf, N. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 1984, 13:187-222
    [6] Lang, M., Lundholm, R. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review, 1996, 71:467-493
    [7] Warner, J., Watts, R., Wruck, K. Stock prices and top management changes. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20: 431-461
    [8] Bernnan, N. Voluntary Disclosure of Profit Forecasts by Target Companies in takeover Bids. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1999, 26: 883-917
    [9] Narayanan, R. Insider trading and the voluntary disclosure of information. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2000, 24(3), 395-425
    [10] Aboody, D. , Kasznik, R. CEO stock options awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2000, 29:73 100
    [11] Nagar et al. Discretionary disclosure and stock-based incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2003, 34, 283-309
    [12] Skinner, D. Why firms voluntarily disclose bad news. Journal of Accounting Research, 1994,32: 38-61
    [13] Trueman, B. Why do managers voluntarily release earnings forecasts? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1986, 8: 53-72
    [14] Forker. Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business, Research, 1992,22: 111-124
    [15] Meek, Roberts, Gray. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosure by U.S.,U.K. and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies,1995
    [16] Ruland, W., Tung, S. & George, N. Factors associated with the disclosure of managers' forecasts. The Accounting Review, 1990, 65: 710-21
    [17] ElGazzar, S. M. Predisclosure information and institutional ownership: A cross-sectional examination of market revaluations during earnings announcement periods [J]. The Accounting Review, 1998, 73(1): 119-129
    [18] Simon S.M.HO, Kar Shun Wong. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 2001, 10:139-156
    [19] Chau, G. K., Gray, S. J. Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting, 2002, 37:247-265
    [20] Eng, L. L., Mak, Y. T. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2003, 22: 325-345
    [21] Bernard Raffournier. The Determinants of Voluntary Financial Disclosure by Swiss Listed Companies. European Accounting Review, 1995, 4: 261-280
    [22] Bowman, E. H., Haire, M. A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 1975, 2: 49-58
    [23] Preston, L. E. Analyzing corporate social performance: Methods and results. Journal of Contemporary Business, 1978, 7: 135-149
    [24] Cowen, s., erreri, L. and Parker, L. The impart of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1987, 12:111-122
    [25] Mcnally, G., L.Eng, and R. Hasseldine. Corporate financial Reporting in New Zealand: An analysis information. Accounting and Business Research, 1982, 46: 11-20
    [26] Elibert, H., R. I. Parket. The Practice of Business: The Current Status of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Horizons, 1973, 16:5-14
    [27] Chow, C. W., Wong, B. Voluntary financial disclosure by Mexican corporations. The Accounting Review, 1987, 62(3): 533-536
    [28] Cooke, T. E. Disclosure in Japanese Corporate Annual Reports. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1993, 6: 11-20
    [29] J. L. Mckinnon, L. Dalimunthe. Voluntary disclosure of segment information by Australian diversified companies. Accounting and Finance, 1993,(33):33~50
    [30] McNichols, M. Evidence of information asymmetries from management earnings forecasts and stock returns. Accounting Review, 1989, 64, 1-27
    [31] Hassell, J., Jennings, R., Lasser, D. Management earnings forecasts: their usefulness as a source of firm-specific information to security analysts. The Journal of Financial Research, 1988, 11: 303–320
    [32] Trueman, B. Managerial disclosures and shareholder litigation. Review of Accounting Studies, 1997, 2: 181-199
    [33] Sengapta Partha. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review, 1998, 73: 459-474
    [34] Botosan, C. A., M. Plumlee. A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 2002, 40(1): 21-40
    [35] Pownall, G., Waymire, G. Voluntary disclosure credibility and securities prices: evidence from management earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 1989, 27: 227–246
    [36] Healy, P., Hutton, A., Palepu, K. Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increases in disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1999, 16: 485-520
    [37]李明辉,何海.对自愿性信息披露的若干思考.兰州大学学报,2002,04:38-44
    [38]何卫东.上市公司自愿性信息披露研究.深圳证券交易所综合研究所研究报告,2003
    [39]陈艳.会计信息披露方式的经济学思考.会计研究, 2004, 08: 51-56
    [40]赵从水.美中自愿性信息披露规制比较.中国审计, 2007, 04: 64-65
    [41]王雄元.自愿性信息披露:信息租金与管制.会计研究,2005, 04: 25-30
    [42]李正,向锐.中国企业社会责任信息披露的界定、计量方法和现状研究.会计研究, 2007, 07: 03-09
    [43]赵敏.上市公司自愿性信息披露中的映像管理行为分析.当代财经, 2007, 03: 117-119
    [44]乔旭东.上市公司年度报告自愿性信息披露行为的实证研究.当代经济科学, 2003, 03: 74-82
    [45]张宗新,郭来生和季雷等.上市公司自愿性信息披露的有效性研究.深圳证券交易所第六届会员单位、基金公司研究成果评选C产品制度类二等奖, 2003
    [46]崔学刚.公司治理机制对公司透明度的影响—来自中国上市公司的经验数据.会计研究, 2004, 08: 72-80
    [47]李豫湘,付秀明,彭聪等.中国公司治理与及自愿性信息披露的实证分析.重庆大学学报,2004.12:142-145
    [48]封思贤.公司业绩与自愿性信息披露的实证研究.经济问题探索,2005,06:89-93
    [49]李远勤,刘艳萍.股权结构与自愿性信息披露-来自深市国有上市公司的经验证据.统计与决策,2006,10:96-99
    [50]巫升柱.中国上市公司年度报告自愿披露影响因素的实证分析.当代财经,2007,08:121-124
    [51]马忠,无翔宇.金字塔结构对自愿性信息披露程度的影响:来自家族控股上市公司的经验验证.会计研究,2007,01:44-50
    [52]沈洪涛.公司特征与公司社会责任信息披露-来自我国上市公司的经营证据.会计研究,2007,03:9-16
    [53] Jensen, R. E., Meckling, W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360
    [54] Stephen Ross. Disclosure Regulation in Financial Markets: Implications of Modern Finance Theory and Signaling Theory. Financial Regulation, 1979, 177-201
    [55]柯林·梅耶.市场经济和过渡经济的企业治理机制.牛津大学出版社,1992
    [56]青木昌彦,钱颖一.转轨经济中的公司治理结构.北京:中国经济出版社,1995
    [57]张维迎.企业的本质、治理结构和国有企业改革—现代企业理论研究文集.天津:南开大学出版社,1998
    [58]吴敬琏.现代公司与企业改革.天津:天津人民出版社,.38-45
    [59]奥利弗·哈特.公司治理:理论与启示.经济学动态,1996,06
    [60]李维安等.公司治理.天津:中国南开大学出版社,2001.31-37
    [61] Fama, E., Jensen, M. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics,1983,26:301–326
    [62] Ruland, W., Tung, S. & George, N. Factors associated with the disclosure of managers' forecasts [J]. The Accounting Review, 1990, 65: 710-21
    [63] Hill, J. G. Deconstructing Sunbeam–Contemporary issues in corporate governance. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 1999,67:1099–1127
    [64] Haskins, M.E., Ferris, K. R., Selling, T. I. International financial reporting and analysis: a contextual emphasis, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2000
    [65] Wang, J. W. Governance role of different types of state-share holders: Evidence from China’s listed companies. http://paper. ssrn. com/sol3/papers/cfm? Abstract_id=477282,2004-03-07
    [66] Shirley, M., Walsh, P. Public vs. Private ownership: The Current State of the Debate. The World Bank, 2000
    [67]徐莉萍,辛宇,陈工孟.控股股东的性质与公司经营绩效.世界经济,2006,10:78-96
    [68] Gillan., Laura, T, Starks. Corporate Governance Proposals and Shareholder Activism: the Role of Institutional Investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 57:275-305
    [69]石良平,李洋.机构投资者介入公司治理的作用研究.上海经济研究,2007,07:83-89
    [70]崔学刚.公司治理机制对公司透明度的影响—来自中国上市公司的经验数据.会计研究, 2004, 08: 72-80
    [71] Dechow, P., R. Sloan., A, Sweeney. Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1996, 13(1):1–36
    [72] Forker. Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business, Research, 1992,22: 111-124
    [73] R·I·Tricker. Corporate Governance. Oxford, 1984
    [74]向荣.上市公司独立董事独立性的界定与公司治理结构的关系—美国、香港地区与中国大陆的对比分析.南开管理评论,2002(6):67-70
    [75]谭劲松.独立董事与公司治理—基于我国上市公司的研究.北京:中国财政经济出版,2003:10-25
    [76] Chen, C. J., Jaggi, B. Association between independent non-executive directors, family control and financial disclosure in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2000, 19:285-310
    [77]崔学刚.公司治理机制对公司透明度的影响—来自中国上市公司的经验数据.会计研究, 2004, 08: 72-80
    [78]乔旭东,孙美华,巫升柱.我国上市公司内部治理结构影响自愿披露水平的实证分析.财经经丛,2007,128(1):89-96
    [79]崔学刚.公司治理机制对公司透明度的影响—来自中国上市公司的经验数据.会计研究, 2004, 08: 72-80
    [80] Cooke, T. E. Disclosure in Japanese Corporate Annual Reports. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1993, 6: 11-20
    [81] Elibert, H., R. I. Parket. The Practice of Business: The Current Status of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Horizons, 1973, 16:5-14
    [82]崔学刚.公司治理机制对公司透明度的影响—来自中国上市公司的经验数据.会计研究, 2004, 08: 72-80
    [83] Bernard Raffournier. The Determinants of Voluntary Financial Disclosure by Swiss Listed Companies. European Accounting Review, 1995,4:261-280
    [84]赵宇龙.会计盈余披露的信息含量—来自上海股市的经验证据.经济研究,1998,7:10-34
    [85]谢志华,崔学刚.信息披露水平:市场推动与政府监管---基于中国上市公司数据的研究.审计研究,2005,4:39-45
    [86]上海证券交易所研究中心.中国公司治理报告(2005):民营上市公司治理.上海:复旦大学出版社,2006.9-140
    [87]李维安,姜涛,李晓义.中国上市公司治理评价与指数分析—基于2006年1249家公司.管理世界,2007,5:104-114
    [88]王雄元,管考磊.关于审计委员会特征与信息披露质量的实证研究.审计研究,2006,06:42-49
    [89]上海证券交易所研究中心.中国公司治理报告(2007):利益相关者与公司社会责任.上海:复旦大学出版社,2007.28-29
    [90]深圳证券交易所研究小组.独立董事:监督者还是咨询专家?----兼论治理型公司.深圳证券交易所综合研究所研究报告,2006
    [91]蒋义宏.会计失真成因与对策研究.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2002.325-330

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700