坪床结构对北京地区高尔夫果岭草坪性能的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
高尔夫果岭是我国当前草坪科研和生产实践中相对薄弱的一个领域,对我国体育运动的发展和国际间的交流有着十分重要的影响。高尔夫果岭质量受坪床物理性状的影响。一个好的坪床建造体系将会形成一个高质量的高尔夫果岭,也能大大节省后期的管理成本,对草坪群落特征和草坪使用功能起着最基本的和长期的制约作用。试验设4个处理:土壤坪床(T1),纯沙坪床(T2),半改良沙基坪床(T3)和全改良沙基坪床(T4),小区面积2×3㎡。
     结果表明综合速率模型(IRM)能通过计算草坪的综合性能指数(CPI),综合的、定量的、客观的评价高尔夫果岭的质量。主要研究结论如下:
     1、坪床的物理性状受诸多因素的影响,新建草坪的土壤饱和导水率和入渗率并没有达到USGA标准。随土壤中的含沙量增加,土壤饱和导水率、土壤入渗率、气体孔隙度都增加。土壤坪床总孔隙度和水分孔隙度高于沙基坪床,容重值小于沙基坪床。四种坪床的pH值显碱性,灌溉水是主要的影响因子。
     2、土壤的物理性状影响高尔夫果岭的群落特征,特别是草坪的外观质量和根系生长。从各个坪床的草坪根系生长来看,75%-90%根量集中在0-50mm内,根系分布在地表30cm内,这与大多数研究者结论一致,沙基坪床的根量及根系分布都优于土壤坪床。
     3、利用综合速率模型公式能很好的对高尔夫果岭的性能进行综合、定量和客观地评价和动态监视,并可以用作高尔夫果岭季节性管理规划的决策工具。
     4、草炭常用于改良沙基坪床,其中半改良的沙基坪床(T3)能代替USGA推荐的全改良沙基坪床(T4)。四种坪床的CPI依次为:T3(0.89)>T4(0.71)>T2(0.68)>T1(0.56)。
Golf green is a relative week research field of turfgrass science in our country, which is crucial for the development and intercommunition of athletic sports. Rootzone physical properties have great effects on performance of sport turf. A good rootzone will produce a high quality of sport turf, and significantly save the cost of latter maintenance, which have the basic and long-term constraints to turf sward characteristics and turf playing quality. The experiment includes four treatments: soil-based rootzone(T1), pure sand rootzone(T2), partically amendes sand rootzone(T3), fully amended sand rootzone(T4). The plots were constructed within 2×3㎡.
     The results showed that performance of sport turf could be objectively, quantitatively and comprehencively assessed by using an Integrated Rate Methodology(IRM) model through computing the Comprehensive Performance Index(CPI). The main results are as follows:
     1. There were many factors effecting rootzone physical properties. Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and infiltration rate of new turf were not up to standards of USGA. With sand content increasing, soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, infiltration rate and air-filled porosity increased. Compared to sand-base rootzone, total porosity and water-filled porosity of soil rootzone were more, and bulk denstity was less. pH of four rootzones were alkaline that is mainly caused by irrigation water.
     2. Soil physical properties affected sward characteristics of sport turf, especially to performance and root growth of turf. The main percentage of root mass were 75%-90% in the 0-50mm depth, and root distribution was in the 30cm of surface, which agreed with the majority of researchers. Root mass and root distribution of sand-base rootzone were better than soil-based rootzone.
     3. By , IRM could comprehencively, quantitatively and objectively assess, dynamic monitor and appear a decision-making tool in seasonal management of sport turf.
     4. Peat offen was used to amend sand-base rootzone. T3 could be instead of T4 which was recommended by USGA. The CPI of four rootzones was: T3(0.89) > T4(0.71) > T2(0.68) > T1(0.56).
引文
1.戴其根,周兰胜,陈后庆,等.践踏强度对不同坪床结构狗牙根地上部分生长的影响[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2006,27(2):86-90.
    2.单秀枝,魏由庆,严慧竣等.土壤有机质含量对土壤水动力学参数的影响[J].土壤学报.1998,35(1):1~9.
    3.韩烈保.高尔夫球场草坪[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.
    4.韩烈保.高尔夫果岭[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.
    5.胡叔良,赖明洲.高尔夫球场及高尔夫果岭设计建植与管理[M].北京:北京林业出版, 1998:113.
    6.梁树友.高尔夫球场建造与草坪管理.北京:中国农业出版社,1999.
    7.宋桂龙.高尔夫果岭土壤配比及对草坪草生长影响研究.北京林业大学森林培育学科草坪管理博士论文[D].2006.
    8.孙吉雄.草坪学(第二版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003.
    9.唐国斌.泥炭对草坪生长综合作用的研究[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),1998,21(1):73.
    10.姚贤良,程云生等.土壤物理学[M].北京:农业出版社.1986.
    11.中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学出版社.1978
    12. Acista-Marinez V,Reucger Z, Turco R F, et al. The role of tree leaf mulch and aitrogen fertilizer on turfgrass soil quality[J].Biol.Fertil.Soils.,1999,29:55-61.
    13. Adams W A, Stewart V I,Thormton D J. The assessment of sands suitable for use in sports fields[J].J. Sports Turf Res.Inst.,1971,47:77-85.
    14. Adams W A. The effect of organic matter on the bulk and true densities of some uncultivated podzolic soils[J]. Journal of Soil Science, 1971, 24(1):11-17.
    15. Agnew,M.L. & Carrow,R..N.(1985). Soil compaction and moisture stress preconditioning in Kentucky bluegrass.Ⅰ.Soil aeration,water uses, and root responses.Agronomy Journal,77:872-878.
    16. Baker S W, Canaway P M. The cost-effectiveness of different construction methods for association football pitches .I. Soil pHysical properties[J]. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 1997,66:8-20.
    17. Baker S W, Mooney S J, Cook A. The effects of sand type and rootzone amendmends on golf green performance. I. Soil properties[J]. Journal of Turfgrass Science, 1999, 75:2-17.
    18. Baker S W, Mooney S J, Cook A. The effects of sand type and rootzone amendmends on golf green performance. II. Grass characteristics[J]. Journal of Turfgrass Science, 1999, 5:18-26.
    19. Baker S W, Mooney S J, Cook A. The effects of sand type and rootzone amendmendson golf green performance. III. Playing quality[J]. Journal of Turfgrass Science, 1999, 75:27-35.
    20. Baker S W, Richards C W. The effects of fibre reinforcement on the quality of sand rootzones used for winter games pitches[J].J. Sports Turf Res.Inst.,1995,71:107-117.
    21. Barrett F B. The soil foundation of a putting green[J]. Bulletin of Green Section, 1924, 4(3):61-66.
    22. Bingaman D E, Helmut Kohnke.Evaluating sands for athletic turf [J] Agron.J.,1970,62:464-467.
    23. Brown K W, Duble R L. PHysical characteristics of soil mixture used for golf green construction[J].Agron J.1975,67:647-652.
    24. Bunnell, B.T., McCarty, .L.B.(2001).Summer bentgrass cultivation: Risk or reward? Australia Turfgrass Management,3(6):34-40.
    25. Canaway,P.M. & Bennett,R.A. (1986). The effects of fertilizer nitrogen on the water infiltration rate of a sand rootzone for football.Journal Sports Turf Research Institude,62:204-206.
    26. Carrow R N. Managing turf for maximum root growth[J].Golf Course Management, 1989, 57(7):18-26.
    27. Carrow R N. Surface organic matter in creeping bentgrass greens[J]. Golf Course Management ,2004, 72(5):02-105.
    28. Couillard, A., Turgeon, A.J. & Rieke,P.E.(1997).New insights into thatch biodegradation.International Turfgrass Society Research Journal,8:1-6.
    29. Cunqi Liu. Effect of roorzone composition and cultivation/aeration treatment on the performance of golf greens under New Zealand conditions(pH.D. thesis).Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand,2004.
    30. Curtis, A. & Pulis, M. (2001). Evolution of a sand-based rootzone. Golf Course Management,69(3):53-57.
    31. Daniel W.H. Freebprg R.P, Robey M J. Prescription athletic turf system[A]. Proc.2nd Int.Turfgrass Rec.Conf.[C].Blackbury Va, June 1973,(ed, E.C.,Roberts).Madison, Wicsonsin,Am.Soc.Agron.1974,277-280.
    32. Davis R R. PHysical condition of putting-green soil and other environmental factors affecting the quality of greens[J].USGA J.Turf Mnagement,1952,6(1):25-27.
    33. Dixon Charles R. The application of sand technology for turf system[J]. Sports Turf Magazine,1994,6:12-15.
    34. Duble R L. The USGA green after 15 years[J]. USGA Green Section Record,1974,12(2):8-10.
    35. Ferguson M H. When you build a putting green make sure the soil mixture is a good one[J]. USGA Journal and Turf Management, 1955, 9(11):26-30.
    36. Ferguson G A. Pepper I L., Kneebone W R. Growth of creeping bentgrass on a new for turfgrass growth:Clinoptilolite zeolite-amended sand[J].Agron J., 1986,78:1095-1098.
    37. Garman W L.The permeability of various grades of sand and peat and mixtures of these with soil and vermiculite[J]. USGA J. Turf Management, 1952,6(1):27-28.
    38. Gibbs R J, Liu C, Yang M H, Wrigley M P. Effect of roorzone composition and cultivation/aeration treatment on surface characteristics of golf greens under New Zealand conditions[J]. Journal of Turfgrass Science , 2000, 76:37-52.
    39. Gibbs R J, Liu C, Yang M H, Wrigley M P. Effect of roorzone composition and cultivation/aeration treatment on the pHysical and root growth performance of golf greens under New Zealand conditions[J]. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 2001, (9):506-517.
    40. Glasgow A , Gibbs R, McAuliffe K W, Liu C. Aninvestigation of organic matter levels in New Zealand golf greens[J]. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 2005, (10):1078-1084.
    41. Gregg L D.Aand ans rice hull comparison for greens mixtures[J]. Texas Turfgrass.,1989,42(3):21,24,26-28.
    42. Habeck, J. & Christians, N. (2000). Time alters greens’key characteristics.Golf Course Management, 68(5):54-60.
    43. Hagan R M. Stockton J S. Effects of porous soil amendments on water retention characteristics of soil[J]. USGA J. Turf Management, 1952,6(1):29-31.
    44. Hakansson,Ⅰ.(1990). A method for characterizing the state of compactness of the plough layer.Soil and Tillage Research,16:105-120.
    45. Hannaford,J & Baker,S.W. (2000). The effect of rootzone compaction and compaction on root development in sand-dominated golf green profiles. Journal of Turfgrass Science,76:24-36.
    46. Hind P D, Baker S W, Lodge ,Hunt J A, Binns D J. A survey of golf greens in Great Britain. I. Soil properties[J]. Journal Sports Turf Research Institude, 1995, 71:9-21.
    47. Hhinesly T D.Soil amendments,IIIinois Turfgrass Conference Proceedings[R].1963,10-12.
    48. Huang Z T, Petrovic A M.PHysical properties of sand affected by clinoptilolite zeoliteparticle size and quality[J].Journal of Turfgrass Management, 1995,1:1-15.
    49. Humbert R P, Grau F V.A report on some studies of the pHysical properties of putting green soil as related to turf maintenance[J]. Part 1.USGA J. Turf Management,1949,2(2):25-32;2(3):28-29.
    50. Hummel, N. W. (1993). Rational for the revisions of the USGA green construction specifications. USGA Green Section Record,31(2):7-21.
    51. Hummel, N. W. (1994). Revisiting the USGA green recommendations. Golf Course Management,62(7):57-59.
    52. Janson L E.Adequste soil tupes for spoet turfgrasses[A].Proc.1stInt.Turfgrass Res.Conf.[C].Harrogate,England,July 1969(David R R).Bingley,England,Sports Turf Res. Ins., 1969,142-148.
    53. Joo Y K, Lee J P, Christians N E, Minner D D. Modification of sand-based soil media with organic and inorganic soil amendments[J].International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 2001, 9:525-531.
    54. Juncker, P.H. and J J.Madison.Soil moisture characterstics of sand-peat mixes[J].Soil Sci.Soc.Am.Pro.1967,31:5-8.
    55. Karcher,D.E.,Nikolai, T.A. &Rieke,P.E.(1996). The HydroJect: Not just an aerifier.66th Annual Michigan Turfgrass Conference Proceedings,25:119-121.
    56. Karcher,D.E., Rieke,P.E. & Make,J.F. (2001).Cultivation effects on surface qualities of an Agrostis Palustris putting green. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal,9:532-536.
    57. Karlsson, I. M. (1988). Soil construction, drainage and maintenace for Swedish grassed parks and sports fields.Uppsala: The Scandinavian Association of Agricultural Scientists and the Royal Swedish Academy of Agricultural and Forestry.
    58. Kunze R J.The reinforcement of different golf green soil mixture on plant growth[D].MSc.Thesis,Texas A.& M.College,1956.
    59. Leboucher,J.P.(1989). Observations on the influence of the nature and grain-size of the different layers making up the substrate for the root-system of golf-courses,green-turfs and sports-ground turfs.In:Proceedings 6th International Turfgrass Research Conference, Tokyo, Japan(Ed.Shokucho-kaikan),pp.267-268.
    60. Lemaire,F.& Bourgoin.B.(1981). Consequences of artificial wear on the root systems of five turfgrass species grown in three substrates for Purr Wick System. In:Proceedings 4th International Turfgrass Research Conference,(Ed. R.W.Sheard).Ontario Agtic.College/International Turfgrass Society,pp.241-249.
    61. Lodge T A,Baker S W. The construction, irrigation and fertilizer nutrition of golf greens. II. Playing quality during the first year of differential irrigation and nutrition treatments[J]. Journal Sports Turf Research Institute, 1993, 67:44-52.
    62. Loschinkohl C, Rimelspach J W, Boehm M J,Impact of compost amendments on turf establishment, quality, and disease severity[R].1999 Annual Meeting Abstracts(ASA/CSSA/SSSA)91:137,Salt Lake City,UT.Oct.31-Nov.4.,1999.
    63. McAuliffe,K.W., Rieke,P.E. & Horne,D.J.(1993). A study of three pHysical conditioning treatments on a fine sandy loam golf green. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 7:4444-450.
    64. McCoy, E. L. (1992). Quantitative pHysical assessment of organic materials used in sports turf rootzone mixes. Agronomy Journal, 84:375-381.
    65. Morgan W C, Letey J, Richards S J, et al. PHysical soil amendments, soil compaction, irrgation, and wetting agents in turfgrass management.Ⅰ.Effects on compactability, water infiltration rates, evapotransiration, and number of irrigations[J].Agron J.,1966,58:525-528.
    66. Murphy J A, Honig J A, Samarnyake H, Lawson T J, Murphy S L. Creeping bentgrass establishment on rootzones varying in sand sizes[J]. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 2001, (9):573-579.
    67. Murphy J W. Field T R, Hickey M J. Age development in sandbased turf[J] International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 1993, (7):164-468.
    68. Myer, S., Gibbs, R.J.,Liu,C.&Wrigley,M.(2003).Zeolity amendment– can it improve rootzone and turfgrass performance? New Zealand Turf Management Journal, 18(4):13-17.
    69. Neylan J, Robinson M. Sand amendments for turf construction[J]. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 1997, 8(1):133-147.
    70. Nus J L, Brauen S E. Clinoptilolitic zeolite as an amendment for establishment of creeping bentgrass on sandy media[J]. HortScience. 1991,26(2):117-119.
    71. O’Brien, P.M. & Hartwiger,C.(2003). Aeration and topdressing for the 21st century.USGA Green Section Record,41(2):1-7.
    72. O’Neil,K.J. & Carrow, R.N. (1983).Perennial ryegrass growth, water use, and soil aeration status under soil compaction. Agronomy Journal,75:177-180.
    73. Paul et al. The effects of organic and inorganic amendments on the hydraulic conductivity of three sands used for turfgrass soils[J]. J.Sports Turf Res.Inst.1970,46:22-32.
    74. Poul, J. L., Madison, J. H. & Waldron, L. (1970). Effects of organic and inorganic amendments on the hydraulic conductivity of three sands used for turfgrass soils. JournalSports Turf Research Institute,46:22-32.
    75. Petrovic, A. M., Wasiura, J. & Metler, C.(1997). PHysical stability of rootzone amendments for sports fields. In: Cornell Turfgrass: Annual Report 1996-1997,pp. 37-39.
    76. Petrovic, A. M.(1993). Potential for natural zeolite as a soil amendment. Golf Course Management,58(11):92-94.
    77. Radko A M. Refining green section specifications for putting green construction[A]. In Proc.2nd Int. Turfgrass Res, Conf.[C],Blacksburg Va., June 1973,(ed. E.C.Roberts).June 1973,(ed.E.C.Roberts). Madison,Wisconsin,Am.Soc.Agron.1974,287-297.
    78. Richer A C, White J W, Musser H B, et al. Comparison of various organic materials for used in construction and maintenance of golf greens[R].Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station, Progress Report,1949(16):1-6.
    79. Rieke,P.E. & Murphy,J.A. (1989). Advances in turf cultivation. In:Proceedings 6th International Turfgrass Research Conference, Tokyo, Japan(Ed.H.Takaton),pp.49-54.
    80. Rimmer D L.(1979). Effects of increasing compaction on grass growth in colliery spoil. Journal Sports Turf Research Institute,55:153-162.
    81. Schmidt, R. E. (1980). Bentgrass growth in relation to soil properties of typical hapludalfs soil variously modified for a golf green.In: Proceedings 3rd International turfgrass Research Conference, (Ed. J. B. Beard). Am. Soc. Of Agronomy,pp. 205-214.
    82. Shepard, D.P. Comparsion of pHysical and chemical properties of commercal and indigenous forms of organic matter in golf greeen soil mixtures[D]. M.S. thesis.The Univ.of Tennessee,Knoxville,1978.
    83. Sills,M.J.& Carrow, R.N.(1983). Turfgrass growth, N use ,and water use under soil compaction and N fertilization. Agronomy Journal,75:488-492.
    84. Snow,J.T. (1992).Why not pure sand greens? USGA Green Section Record,30(4):21.
    85. Stewart,V.L. Sports Turf: Science, construction and maintenance [M].London;New York:E&FN Spon.1994:11-12.
    86. Stomberg A L, HempHill D D, Volk V V, et al. Tall fescue response and soil properties following soil amendments with tannery wastes[J].Agron.J., 1984,76:719-723.
    87. Swartz W E,Kardos L T. Effects of compaction on pHysical properties of and sand-soil-peat mixtures of various moisture contents[J]. Agron.J.,1963,55:7-10.
    88. Taylor D H, Blake G R. Predicting sand content of modified soil mixtures from sand,soil, and peat properties[J]. Agron J.,1984,76:583-587.
    89. Taylor D H, Blake G R.Sand content of sand-soil-peat mixtures for turfgrass[J]. SoilSci.Soc.Am. J.,1979,43:94-398.
    90. Taylor D H, Willams C F.& Nelson S D.(1991).Measuring water infiltration rates of sports turf areas.Agronomy Journal,83:427-429.
    91. Thien S J. (1994). Compaction’s effect on soil biological processes. Golf Course Management,62(10):56-86.
    92. Tucker,K.A., Karnok,K. L., Radcliffe,D.E., Landry,G.,Roncadori,R. W. and Tan,K.H.(1990). Localized dry sports as caused by hydropHobic sands on bentgrass greens. Agronomy Journal,82:549-555.
    93. USGA Green Section Staff. 1993. USGA recommendations for a method of putting green constriction. USGA Green Section Record 31(2):1-3.
    94. USGA Green Section Staff. 2004. USGA recommendations for a method of putting green constriction.[Online].
    95. Van Wijk,A. L. M. (Ed.). (1980). A soil technological study on effectuating and maintaining adequate playing conditions of grass sports fields. Wageningen:Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.
    96. Vavrek, R.C. (1992). Aeration: Needed more today than ever before.USGA Green Section Record,30(2):1-5.
    97. Waddington et al. Soil modifying soils on turfgrass areas[J]. In:J.C.Harper(ed).PTC Turfgrass Comments,1976.1.(1):45-49.
    98. Waddington et al. Soil modification for tufrgrass areas.Ⅰ.PHysical properties of pHysical amended soils[M].Pennsylvania Agri. Exp. Stn. Prog. Rep.1974:337.
    99. Wilder A B. A rapid renovation of putting greens[J]. Bulletin of Green Section, 1923, 3(8):217-218.
    100. Wilkinson, F.(1994). Applying compost to the golf course. Golf Course Management.62(3):80-110.
    101. Williams,D.,Gibbs,R.J. & McAuliffe,K.W. (1992). Sand & Soil Rugby fields-how do they compare? PartⅠ:Soil pHysical properties.New Zealand Turf Management Journal, 6(1):21-25.
    102. Wallis,M.G. & McAuliffe,K.W.(1988). The use of wetting agent for water repellent soils.New Zealand Turf Management Journal,2(2):13-16.
    103. Wim J B, Lamers J G, Termorshuizen A J, et al. Control of soilborne plant pathogens by incorporation fresh organic amendments followed by tarping[J].PHytopathology,2000,90:253-259.
    104. Yang, M.H.,Gibbs,R. & Wrigley,M. (1998). Laboratory investigation of New Zealand produces zeolite as an inorganic amendment for sand-based root zones.Proceedings of 6th New Zealand Sports Turf Convention.Rotorua,New Zealand, pp.27-31.
    105. York,C.A.& Baldwin,N.A. (1992). Dry patch on golf greens: A review.Journal Sports Turf Research Institute,68:7-32.
    106. York,C.A.(1993). A questionnaire survey of dry patch on golf courses in the United Kingdom.Journal Sports Turf Research Institute,69:20-25.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700