不同玉米种质苗期根系性状的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
试验于2009-2010年在河北农业大学培养室进行,采用了12个玉米杂交种与14个自交系为材料,系统研究了苗期(播种-7叶期)植株的生长发育动态,并对根系的生长发育及根系性状特征(根系质量、体积、根长密度、根系表面积和入土角度等)进行了重点研究。本研究对进一步明确不同种质的根系形状特征、地上地下关系以及根系性状与耐旱性的关系都具有重要的理论与实践意义。研究得到以下结果:
     1.针对盆栽法对根系研究的不便,首先研究创立了生长袋培养法。通过盆栽法和生长袋培养法比较试验,认为采用生长袋法研究玉米苗期地上部和地下部性状具有实际可行性和明显的优越性,为进一步研究不同种质的根系性状提供了技术支撑。采用生长袋法培养结合钉板固定洗根可以方便地研究根系性状,比如根系节根层数与数量,节根各层次的入土角度等。生长袋制作方便、价格低廉,占地空间小,可为大批量玉米种质根系性状筛选研究以及其他作物根系研究提供了便利的研究方法。
     2.研究了不同环境因素对苗期玉米生长发育的影响。研究认为,在本试验条件下,以每个生长袋施1.0g尿素较有利于幼苗的生长发育;供水量试验认为,以每个生长袋每次供水100ml较为合理;比较了壤土和沙质土玉米幼苗培养效果,以壤土更适合玉米地上和地下的发育。
     3.比较了郑单958和CN165两品种的生长发育动态,两个品种地上部与根系的各个指标之间具有显著的差异;郑单958的各个指标随着叶龄期的延长增加的幅度较大,而CN165的各个指标增幅度较小。CN165是抗旱品种,其植株矮小,节根数量较少可能与其节水抗旱有关。
     4.通过对12个玉米杂交种和14个自交系比较研究可见:杂交种在地上地下发育均比自交系有明显的优势,在7叶期株高、叶面积、地上和地下干重均达到显著差异,但根冠比差异未达显著水平。耐旱种质CN-165根系质量虽然不及其他杂交种,但根长、体积和吸收面积在0-20cm所占的比例较高。与自交系相比,杂交种的浅层根系性状所占的比例要高于自交系。
     5.比较不同种质各层节根的根系入土角度可见,不同种质根系的平均入土角度各不相同,不同种质随节根层数的上升,角度逐渐减小。比较不同种质第二层根系分布情况可见,耐旱种质CN165、中单8578、冀玉10、浚单20根系生长角度较大,造成浅层根系较多;而耗水较多的品种先玉335、郑单958、蠡玉18、永研4的根系的下扎角度较小,造成内围根系的质量要高于外围。不同种质具有特有的根系性状。根系的入土角度与耐旱性的关系有待进一步研究。
Experiment was conducted in cultivating room of college of Agronomy, AUH during 2009-2010 with 12 hybrids and 14 inbred lines of maize. The growth and development of seedling (from sowing to 7 leaf stage) were studied, and the focus were on the growth and development of root system and its characteristics including root mass, volume, root length density, surface area and root angle. This study was of great meaning in both theory and practices in further explicit the root characteristics of different maize germplasm, the relationship between shoot and root, and the relations between root character and drought tolerant. The results are showed as follows.
     1. Growing bag culture method was first set up based on the inconvenient of pot culture method in root character study. Compared with the 2 culture methods it could be found easily that growing bag method was more practicable and advantageous than pot culture method in studying the relationship between shoot and root of maize seedlings, and it was also a good culture method for the study of root characteristics of different germplasm. Using growing bag culture method combined with peg board fixing and root washing the root characteristics could be studied easily, such as the measurement of second root layers, root number, root angles of different root layers, and so on. The growing bag could be made easily and cheap, took little room. This method can be used in massive screening of root character of maize germplasm, even in the root study of other crops.
     2. Effect of environment factors on the growth and development of maize seedlings were studied. The results showed that maize seedling grew well at 1.0g urea per growing bag; irrigated 100ml water per bag every 3 days was reasonable for good seedling growing; compared with the sandy soil maize seedling grew well on loam soil.
     3. The growth and development of maize varieties Zhengdan 958 and CN165 was compared and a significant different was showed both in shoot and root characters. Every item of Zhengdan 958 increased at a big extent with the leaf stage, while for CN165 the scale was much lower. CN165 is a drought tolerant variety, the short plant and less second root number might have something to do with its water-saving and drought tolerant.
     4. It could be found from the comparison of 12 hybrids and 12 inbred lines that hybrids grew well than inbred lines both in shoot and root, and there were significant difference in plant height, leaf area, shoot and root dry weight at 7 leaf stage, but the difference was not significant in root and shoot ratio. Though the root mass of drought tolerant variety CN165 was lower than other varieties, its root length and volume and root surface area took a higher proportion at 0-20 cm soil layer. Compared with inbred lines the hybrids had a much more proportion of roots within the shallow soil layer.
     5. The root angle of every maize germplasm at root layers was measured, and the average angle was different. The root angles were decreased with the increase of root layers. Root distribution of the 2nd root layer was checked, the results showed that the root angles were a little bigger in drought tolerant germplasm, such as CN165, Zhongdan 8578, Jiyu 10, and Xundan 20, causing more roots distributed in the shallow soil layer; while for other germplasm like Xianyu 335, Zhengdan 958, Liyu 18, and Yongyan 4 need much water and the root angles were smaller, caused the root mass concentrated in the inner plant axis other than the out range. Different maize germplasm had there proper root characters. The relationships between root angle and the ability of drought tolerant need further study.
引文
[1]李济生,董淑琴.玉米根系的初步研究[J].北京农业科技,1981(6):18-22
    [2]戚廷香.玉米不同品种根系分布和干物质积累的动态变化研究[J].玉米科学,2003,11 (3):76-79
    [3]孙占祥,魏亚范.盆栽条件下玉米根系的研究[J].杂粮作物,1994(4):28-29
    [4]张海林,高旺盛,陈阜,朱文珊.保护性耕作研究现状、发展趋势及对策[J].中国农业大学学报.2005.10(1):16-20
    [5]刘武仁,边少锋,郑金玉,等.玉米秸秆还田方法试验研究初报[J].吉林农业科学,2002 (6):38-40
    [6]刘武仁,冯艳春,等.玉米宽窄行种植产量与效益分析[J].玉米科学,2003,11(3):63-65
    [7]刘胜群,宋凤斌,王燕.玉米根系性状与地上部性状的相关性研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,2007,29(1):1-6
    [8] Cater W A.A method of growing Plants in water vapor to facilitate examination of roots[J].Phytopathology,1942,32:623-625
    [9] Ahmadi N.Genetic variability and inheritance of drought mechanisms in rice [J].Agronomic Tropical,1983,38(2):188-122
    [10] Lehman V G.Engelke.Heritability estimates of creeping bent grass root system growth in flexible tubes[J].Corp Sci,1991,31:1680-1684
    [11] Turman P C,Wiebold,J A.Cultivar and Planting date effects on soybean root growth [J].Plant Soil,1995,176:235-241
    [12] Krisitian T K.Root growth of green Pea [J].Genotypes Corp Sci,1998,38:1445-1451
    [13] Steen E.Usefulness of the mesh bag method in quantitive root studies [A].Atkinson D,Plant root growth,an ecological perspective [C].Camridge:Cambrige University Press,1991,75-86
    [14] Kono Y A revised experimental system of root-soil interaction for laboratory work [J].Environ.Control in Boil,1998
    [15] Yarnauchi A Comparison of root system structure of 13 species of cereals [J].Japan Jour.Crop Sci,1987,56:618-621
    [16] Victor N B.Differenrial genotypic and root type penetration of compacted soil layers[J].Crop Sci,1998,38:776-781
    [17] Mayandi S.The diatal part of the transition zone is the most aluminum-sensitive apical root zone of maize[J].Plant Physiol,1998,161:155-163
    [18]陈子元.核农学[M].北京:农业出版社,1997
    [19]程建峰,潘晓云,刘宜柏.作物根系研究法最新进展[J].江西农业报,1999,11(4):55-59
    [20] Saini H S,Westgate M E1 Reproductive development in grain crops during drought [J].Advances in Agronomy,2000,68:59-96
    [21] Tuberosa R,Sanguineti M C,Landi P,Giuliani M M,Salvi S,Conti S.Identification of QTLs for root characteristics in maize grown in hydroponics and analysis of their overlap with QTLs for grain yield in the field at two regimes[J].Plant Molecular Biology,2002,48:697-712
    [22]高世斌,冯质雷,李晚忱,等.干旱胁迫下玉米根系性状和产量的QTLs分析[J].作物学报,2005,31(6):718-722
    [23]Edmeades GO,Bolanos J,Banziger M,Chapman SC,Ortega C,Lafitte HR,Fischer KS,Pandey S.Recurrent selection under managed drought stress improves grain yields in tropical maize.In Edmeades GO.Banziger M,Mickelson HR,Pena Valdivia CB eds.Developing drought and low N tolerance Maize[J].Mexico: CIMMYT, 1996.415-425
    [24] Ribaut JM.Hoisington DA,Deutsch JA,Jiang C,Gonzalezde Leon D.Identification of quantitative traitsloci under drought condition in tropical maize.I.Flowering parameters and the anthesis silking interval[J].The Applgenet,1996,92:905-914
    [25]鲍巨松,杨成书,薛吉全,郝引川.干旱胁迫对玉米生长发育及产量形成的影响[J].陕西农业科学,1990(3):7-9
    [26]李秧秧,刘文兆.土壤水分与氮肥对玉米根系生长的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(1):13-15
    [27] Sumcker A J,Aiken R M. Dynamic root responses to water deficits[J].Soil Science,1992,154(4):281-289 [28刘庆花.玉米根际微生态环境与磷素高效利用的研究[D].长春:吉林农业大学,2003
    [29] Pages L,Jordan MO,Picard D.Asimulation model of the three dimendion alarchitecture of the maize root system[J].Plant and Soil,1989,119:147-154
    [30] GeZY,GerardoR,LynchJP.The importance of root gravitropism for inter root competition and phosphorus acquisition efficiency:Results fro mageometric simulation model[J].Plant and Soil,2000,218:159-171
    [31]廖红,戈振扬,严小龙.水磷耦合胁迫下植物磷吸收的理想根构型:模拟与应用[J].科学通报,2001,46:641-646
    [32] Clausnitzer V,Hopmans JW.Simul taneous modeling of transientthree dimensional root growth and soil water flow[J].Plant and Soil,1994,164:299-314
    [33] CoelhoMB,VillalobosFJ,MateosL. Modeling root growth and the soil plant atmosphere continuum of cotton crops[J].Agricultural Water Management,2003,60:99-118
    [34]张立桢,曹卫星,张思平,等.棉花根系生长与空间分布特征[J].植物生态学报,2005,29:266 -273
    [35] Diggle AJ.Rootmap:A model in three dimensional coordinates of the growth and structure of fibrous root systems[J].Plant and Soil,1988,105:169-178
    [36] Lynch JP,Nielsen KL,Davis RD,et al.Sim Root:Modelling and visualization of rootsystems[J].Plant and Soil,1997,188:139-151
    [37] Pages L,Vercambre G,Drouet JL,et al.Root Typ:Ageneric model to depict and analyze the root system architecture[J].Plant and Soil,2004,258:103-119
    [38] Danjon F,Bert D,Godin C,etal.Structural root architecture of year old Pinusp in asterme asured by 3D digitizing and analysed with AMPA Mod[J]. Plant and Soil,1999,217:49-63
    [39] Jourdan C,Rey H. Modelling and simulation of the architecture and development of the oil palm root system[J].Plant and Soil,1997,190:235-246
    [40] Cai KZ,Shen H.Root:the mobile plat between plant and soil[J].Acta Ecologica sinica,2002,1:139-141
    [41] Lidia SAS,Rengel ZED,and Caixian TANG.The effect of Nitrogen nutrition on cluster root formation and proton extrusion by Lupin us albus[J]. Ann Bot,2002,89:435-442
    [42] Ligero F et al.Nitrate and inoculation enhanced ethylene biosynthesis in soybean roots as a possible mediator of nodulation control[J].Plant Physiol.1999,154:482-488
    [43] Lucas WJ.Application of microinjection techniques to plant nutrition[J].Plant Soil,1997,196:175-189
    [44] Lynch J and Brown KM. Ethylene and plant response to nutritional stress[J]. Plant Physiol,1997,100:613-619
    [45] Ma Y Xed.The root of sweat[J].Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press.2000
    [46] Mackay AD,Barber SA.Effect of soil moisture and phosphate level on root hair growth of corn roots[J].Plant Soil,1985,86:321-331
    [47] Maggio A,Joly RJ.Effects of mercuric chloride on the hydraulic conductivity of tomato root systems.Evidence for a channel-mediated pathway[J].Plant Physiol,1995,109:331-335
    [48] Schultze M and Kondorosi A.Regulation of symbiotic root nodule development[J]. Ann.Rev.Genet,1998,32:33-57
    [49] Shan L.Study of water relations and increase agricultural production in Chinese North-West area[J].Plant Physiol Commun,1983,5:7-10
    [50] Shan L,Sun J B et al.A study on production and water use of main crops in southern Ningxia Hilly Area[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,1988; 20:9-16
    [51] Forde B and Lorenzo H.The nutritional control of root development[J].Plant and Soil,2001,232:51-68
    [52] Forde B,Lorenzo H.The nutritional control of root development[J].Plant Soil,2001,232:51-68
    [53] Forde BG.The role of long-distance signaling in plant responses to nitrate and other nutrients[J].Exp Bot,2002,53:39-43
    [54] Yan X L,Zhang F S.Plant nutritional genetics[J] .Beijing:Chinese Agricultural Press.1997
    [55] Zhang H and Forde BG.An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture[J].Science,1998,279:407-409
    [56] Weaver J E,et al.Development of root and s hoot of winter wheat under field environment[J].Ecology,1924,5:26-50
    [57]马元喜.不同土壤小麦根系生长动态的研究[J].作物学报,1987,13(1):37-44
    [58]春亮,陈范骏,米国华,等.玉米苗期根系对氮胁迫反应的配合力分析[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(6):750-756
    [59] Friesl W, Friedl J,Platzer K,et al.Remediation of contaminated agricultural soils near a former Pb/Zn smelter in Austria: Batch,pot and field experiments [J].Environmental Pollution,2006,144(1):40-50
    [60] Baum C,Stetter U,Makesch in F.Growth response of populu strichocarpa to inoculation by the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria laccata in a pot and a field experiment [J].Forest Ecology and Management,2002,163(1-3):1-8
    [61] Xian WANG, Qing-Sheng CAI.Steel slag as an iron fertilier f or corn growth and soil improvement in a pot experiment [J].Pedosphere,2006,16(4):519-524
    [62] Anna Lenzi,Lam bros Pittas,Tommaso Martinelli,et al.Response to water stress of some oleander cultivars suit able for pot plant product ion [J].Scientia Horticulturae,2009,122(3):426-431
    [63] Shugeng Li, Kefang Zhang,Shaoqi Zhou,et al. Use of dewatered municipal sludge on Canna growth in pot experiments with a barren clay soil [J].Waste Management, 2009,29(6):1870-1876
    [64] Yong Zhang,Bo Han Liao,Qing Ru Zeng,et al.Surfactant linear alkyl benzene sulfonate effect on soil Cd fract ions and Cd distribution in soybean plants in a pot experiment [J].Pedosphere,2008,18(2):242-247
    [65] Zhongqiu Zhao,Yunlong Cai,Meichen Fu,et al.Response of the soils of different land use types to drought:Eco-physiological characteristics of pl ant s grow n on the soils by pot experiment[J].Ecological Engineering, 2008, 34 (3):215-222
    [66] Paul-Olivier Redon,Thierry Be guiristain,Corinne Leyval.Influence of glom us in traradices on Cd partitioning in a pot experiment with medicago truncatula in four contaminated soils [J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40 (10):2710-2712
    [67] LiJY,Liu X D,Zhou W,et al.Study on crop breeding new technology about efficiently utilizing nutrient in soil[J]. Chinese science,1995,25(1):41-48
    [68] Liao H,YanXL.Adaptive changes and genotypic variation for root architecture of common bean in response to phosphorus deficiency[J].Acta BotanicaSinica,2000,42(2):158-163
    [69] Liao H,Ge ZH Y,Yan X L.Ideal root architecture for phosphorus acquisition of plants under water and phosphorus coupled stresses:From simulation to application[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2001,46(8):641-646
    [70] Nass H G,Zuber MS.Correlation of corn(L) roots early in development to mature root development[J].Crop Society of America,1971,11:655-658
    [71]张卫萍,吴平,沈晓莹,等.不同供水条件下水稻幼苗根系形成的遗传分析[J].植物学报,2001,43(10):1024-1030
    [72] Hochholdinger F,Katrin W,Michaela S,et al.Genetic dissection of root formation in maize(L.)reveals root-type specific developmental programs[J].Annals of Botany,2004,93:359-368.
    [73]刘婷婷,樊明寿,李春俭.不同玉米氮效率自交系对氮素供应的反应[J].华北农学报,2005,20(3):83-86
    [74] ASP H,Bengtsson B,Jensen P.Growth and cation uptake in spruce(Picea abies Karst) grown in sand culture with various aluminium contents[J].Plant and Siol,1988,111:127-133
    [75]潘瑞炽,董得愚.植物生理学[M].第4版.北京:高等教育出版社,2001
    [76]陆景陵.植物营养学:上册[M].第2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003
    [77]牟金明,姜亦梅,王明辉,等.玉米根茬还田对玉米根系垂直分布的影响[J].吉林农业科学,1999,24(2):25-27
    [78]宋海星,李生秀.玉米生长空间对根系吸收特性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2003,36 (8):899-904
    [79] Lawlor D W.Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield :Mechanisms are the key to understanding production system[J].J.Exp.Bot,2002,53:773-787
    [80] Mackay A D,Barber S A.Effect of nitrogen on root growth of two corn genotypes in the field [J].Agron.J.1986,77:699-703
    [81] Wiesler F,Horst WJ.Root growth and nitrite utilization of maize cultivars under field conditions[J].Plant Soil,1994,163:267-277
    [82] Robins on D,Linehan D J,Caul S.What limits nitrate uptake from soil [J].Plant,Cell Environ.1991,14:77-85
    [83] Heuberger H.Nitrogen efficiency in tropical maize(Zea may L.) indirect selection criteria within special emphasis on morphological root characteristics[D].Germany:PhD.Dissertation,University of Hannover,1998
    [84]李燕婷,米国华,陈范骏,等.玉米幼苗地上部/根间氮的循环及其基因型差异[J].植物生理学报,2001,27(3):226-230
    [85]王艳,米国华,陈范骏,张福锁.玉米氮素吸收的基因型差异及其与根系形态的相关性[J].生态学报,2003,23(2):297-302
    [86] Paul W U,Thomas C K.Soil compaction and root growth:A Review[J].AgronomyJournal,1994,86:759-766
    [87] P L de Fraitas,Zobel R W,Snyder V A .Corn root growth in soil columns with artificially constructed aggregates[J].Crop Science,1999,39:725-730.
    [88] Barber S A.Effect of tillage practice on corn root distribution and morphology[J].Agronomy Journal,1971,63:724-726
    [89]宋海星,李生秀.玉米生长空间对根系吸收特性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(8):899-904
    [90]朱德峰,林贤青,曹卫星.水稻深层根系对生长和产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2001,34(4):429-432
    [91]马元喜.不同土壤小麦根系生长动态研究[J].作物学报,1987,13(1):37-44
    [92] Victor N, Bushamuka,Zobel R W.Differential genotypic and root type penetration of soil layers[J].Crop science,1998,38:776-781
    [93] Mackay A D,Barber S A.Effect of nitrogen on root growth of two corn genotypes in the field[J].Agronomy Journal,1986,78:699-703
    [94] Shierlaw J,Alston A M.Effect of soil compaction on root growth and uptake of phosphorous[J].Plant and Soil,1984,77:15-28
    [95] Bengough A G,Young I M.Root elongation of seeding peas through layered soil of different penetration resistances[J].Plant and Soil,1993,149:129-139
    [96] Materechera S A.Penetration of very strong soil by seeding roots of different species[J].Plant and Soil,1991,135:31-41
    [97]冯广龙,刘昌明.土壤水分对作物根系生长及分布的调控作用[J].生态农业研究,1996,4(3):5-9
    [98]刘殿英,黄炳茹,董庆裕.土壤水分对冬小麦根系的影响[J].山东农业大学学报,1991,22(20):103-110
    [99]郭相平,康绍忠,索丽生.苗期调亏处理对玉米根系生长影响的试验研究[J].灌溉排水,2001,20(1):25-27
    [100]王韶唐.植物抗旱的生理机理[J].植物生理生化进展,1983(2):120-133
    [101] Wilson J R,Ludlow M M.Time trend of solute accumulation and the influence of potassium fertilizer on osmotic adjustment of water stressed leaves of three tropical grasses[J].Aust Plant Physical,1983,110:523-527
    [102]康绍忠,张建华,梁宗锁,等.控制型交替灌溉一种新的农田节水调控思路[J].干旱地区农业研究,1997,(2):1-6
    [103]郭相平,康邵忠,索丽生.苗期调亏处理对玉米根系生影响的试验研究[J].灌溉排水,2001,(1):25-27
    [104]杨贵羽,罗远培,李保国,等.不同土壤水分处理对冬小麦根冠生长影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2003,21(3):104-109

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700