呼和浩特市旗县区征地补偿标准研究
摘要
征地制度是农村土地制度的重要组成部分,十七届三中全会对农用地流转提出新的要求之后,征地制度的改革受到社会各界更广泛的关注。征地补偿标准作为征地制度的核心内容,成为农村土地制度改革的焦点问题。在这种背景条件下,笔者对目前呼和浩特市旗县区执行的征地补偿标准进行了深入的研究,认为呼和浩特市征地补偿标准低,与当地的经济发展不相适应,不能保证失地农民原有的生活水平不降低的需要。呼和浩特市应建立一个科学、合理、有效的征地补偿标准体系,以促进呼和浩特市农用地市场持续、健康、稳定的发展。
在理论研究方面,本文借鉴国内外关于农用地价值研究的成果,确定农用地价值应由农用地的自然经济价值和农用地的外部性价值组成。其中在论述农用地自然经济价值时,认为要建立合理的征地补偿标准,需要科学地消除工农业“剪刀差”对农用地价格的影响;农用地外部性价值包括农用地的社会保障价值和生态价值。由于农用地生态价值是对整体社会成员而言的,因此利用农用地生态价值来主要区分公益性和非公益性征地补偿标准的不同。
在实证方面,论文主要进行了两部分的研究。一是征地补偿价格的计算:本文从呼和浩特市旗县区的实际出发,以农用地价值为基础,计算呼和浩特市旗县区征地补偿价格。呼和浩特市旗县区征地补偿价格包括农用地自然经济价格、农用地社会保障价格和农用地生态价格。农用地自然经济价格和农用地社会保障价格之和为公益性征地的补偿价格,农用地自然经济价格、农用地社会保障价格和农用地生态价格三者之和为非公益事业征地补偿价格。其中农用地自然经济价格的确定运用了收益还原法和指标体系测算法,并在收益还原法中进行了工农业劳动力折算系数为5:1的“剪刀差”修正;指标体系测算法共选择了3个因素11因子,运用层次分析法确定其权重;二是对呼和浩特市旗县区征地统一年产值和征地区片综合地价成果进行分析,采用价格推算法将呼和浩特市旗县区征地区片等别和价格进行了平衡,有效地解决了呼和浩特市旗县区征地补偿标准的区域衔接的问题。
通过以上研究,得出呼和浩特市旗县区公益性征地补偿标准与非公益性征地补偿标准,且两个标准地域排序相同,排序从大到小依次为:市区、托克托县、土默特左旗、和林格尔县、清水河县、武川县。根据呼和浩特市旗县区公益性征地补偿标准,运用面积加权平均法,将呼和浩特市征地区片划分为十二个等别,高等别主要分布在市区,旗县中最高等别为Ⅳ等别,分布在托克托县,最低等别分布在武川县和清水河县。总结以上研究,形成呼和浩特市征地补偿标准体系。
The requisition land system is one of the important components of land system in the countryside. The requisition land system reform receives more widespread attention from the community after the requirements about agricultural land transferring brought by the third Plenum of the 17th Communist Party of China Central Committee. The standard of the requisition land compensation being as the core content of the requisition land system has become the focus of reform on the requisition land system in rural area. As is shown above, the author has conducted the deep research about standard of requisition land compensation carried in county area of Huhhot at present, with the conclusion that the requisition land compensation standard of Huhhot is low, not adapted to the local economy development and can not guarantee 0f do not be reducted the original living need of loses farmers and a science, reasonable and the effective requisition land compensation system should be established in Huhhot in order to promote continual, healthy and the stable development of the agricultural land market in Huhhot
In the fundamental theory research aspect, the achievement of research about agricultural land value at home and abroad is taken as the reference to establish the agricultural land value should be composed of natural and economy value and the exterior value of agricultural land. And when elaborating the natural and economy value of agricultural land, the reasonable standard on the requisition land compensation is needed establish to eliminate the influence of“the difference in price of agricultural and industrial”to agricultural land price scientifically. And the exterior value of agricultural land includes social security value of agricultural land and ecological value of agricultural land. The ecological value of agricultural land should be used to differentiate commonweal welfare and the non-commonweal welfare standard of requisition land compensation, as the ecological value of agricultural land is mainly to the overall members.
In the demonstration aspect, two main parts have been conducted. On one hand, the requisition land compensation price computation, that is requisition land compensation price in county area of Huhhot is computed on the basis of agricultural land value. The result indicates that the requisition land compensation price in county area of Huhhot includes natural and economy price, social security price and ecological price of agricultural land. The compensation price of commonweal requisition land is composed of natural and economy price and social security price of agricultural land. And the compensation price of non-commonweal welfare requisition land is composed of natural and economy price, social security price and ecological price of agricultural land. The income reducing process and the indicator system are adopted to establish the natural and economy price of the agricultural land and forficiform difference revision of the industry and agriculture labor force conversion coefficient of 5:1 in the income reducing process has been implemented. In the indicator system method, 3 factors and 11 elements have been selected and the analytic hierarchy process is used to establish the weight. On the other hand, annual requisition land unification production value and comprehensive requisition land area price established by the county area of Huhhot have been studied, adopting price reckon method to make the requisition land area in the counties of Huhhot balanced in order to solve the problems of lacking of the joining because the differences in requisition land compensation standard between the areas.
Through the studies mentioned above, average standard of commonweal requisition land compensation and non-commonweal requisition land compensation have been got and those sort the same order, with the decrease order of the cantonal area, Tuoketuo county, Tumd zuoqi, Horinger County, Qingshuihe County and Wuchuan County. According to the average standard of commonweal requisition land compensation in the county area of Huhhot and taking the method of average weight to acreage as reference, requisition land area in the whole city has been plotted out 12 grades, with high grade distributing in the cantonal area and the highest grade of grade in the counties of Huhhot appearing in Tuoketuo county and the highest grade of grade in the counties of Huhhot appearing in Helinger county and Wuchuan county. As concluded above, requisition land compensation standard system has been formed in Huhhot.
在理论研究方面,本文借鉴国内外关于农用地价值研究的成果,确定农用地价值应由农用地的自然经济价值和农用地的外部性价值组成。其中在论述农用地自然经济价值时,认为要建立合理的征地补偿标准,需要科学地消除工农业“剪刀差”对农用地价格的影响;农用地外部性价值包括农用地的社会保障价值和生态价值。由于农用地生态价值是对整体社会成员而言的,因此利用农用地生态价值来主要区分公益性和非公益性征地补偿标准的不同。
在实证方面,论文主要进行了两部分的研究。一是征地补偿价格的计算:本文从呼和浩特市旗县区的实际出发,以农用地价值为基础,计算呼和浩特市旗县区征地补偿价格。呼和浩特市旗县区征地补偿价格包括农用地自然经济价格、农用地社会保障价格和农用地生态价格。农用地自然经济价格和农用地社会保障价格之和为公益性征地的补偿价格,农用地自然经济价格、农用地社会保障价格和农用地生态价格三者之和为非公益事业征地补偿价格。其中农用地自然经济价格的确定运用了收益还原法和指标体系测算法,并在收益还原法中进行了工农业劳动力折算系数为5:1的“剪刀差”修正;指标体系测算法共选择了3个因素11因子,运用层次分析法确定其权重;二是对呼和浩特市旗县区征地统一年产值和征地区片综合地价成果进行分析,采用价格推算法将呼和浩特市旗县区征地区片等别和价格进行了平衡,有效地解决了呼和浩特市旗县区征地补偿标准的区域衔接的问题。
通过以上研究,得出呼和浩特市旗县区公益性征地补偿标准与非公益性征地补偿标准,且两个标准地域排序相同,排序从大到小依次为:市区、托克托县、土默特左旗、和林格尔县、清水河县、武川县。根据呼和浩特市旗县区公益性征地补偿标准,运用面积加权平均法,将呼和浩特市征地区片划分为十二个等别,高等别主要分布在市区,旗县中最高等别为Ⅳ等别,分布在托克托县,最低等别分布在武川县和清水河县。总结以上研究,形成呼和浩特市征地补偿标准体系。
The requisition land system is one of the important components of land system in the countryside. The requisition land system reform receives more widespread attention from the community after the requirements about agricultural land transferring brought by the third Plenum of the 17th Communist Party of China Central Committee. The standard of the requisition land compensation being as the core content of the requisition land system has become the focus of reform on the requisition land system in rural area. As is shown above, the author has conducted the deep research about standard of requisition land compensation carried in county area of Huhhot at present, with the conclusion that the requisition land compensation standard of Huhhot is low, not adapted to the local economy development and can not guarantee 0f do not be reducted the original living need of loses farmers and a science, reasonable and the effective requisition land compensation system should be established in Huhhot in order to promote continual, healthy and the stable development of the agricultural land market in Huhhot
In the fundamental theory research aspect, the achievement of research about agricultural land value at home and abroad is taken as the reference to establish the agricultural land value should be composed of natural and economy value and the exterior value of agricultural land. And when elaborating the natural and economy value of agricultural land, the reasonable standard on the requisition land compensation is needed establish to eliminate the influence of“the difference in price of agricultural and industrial”to agricultural land price scientifically. And the exterior value of agricultural land includes social security value of agricultural land and ecological value of agricultural land. The ecological value of agricultural land should be used to differentiate commonweal welfare and the non-commonweal welfare standard of requisition land compensation, as the ecological value of agricultural land is mainly to the overall members.
In the demonstration aspect, two main parts have been conducted. On one hand, the requisition land compensation price computation, that is requisition land compensation price in county area of Huhhot is computed on the basis of agricultural land value. The result indicates that the requisition land compensation price in county area of Huhhot includes natural and economy price, social security price and ecological price of agricultural land. The compensation price of commonweal requisition land is composed of natural and economy price and social security price of agricultural land. And the compensation price of non-commonweal welfare requisition land is composed of natural and economy price, social security price and ecological price of agricultural land. The income reducing process and the indicator system are adopted to establish the natural and economy price of the agricultural land and forficiform difference revision of the industry and agriculture labor force conversion coefficient of 5:1 in the income reducing process has been implemented. In the indicator system method, 3 factors and 11 elements have been selected and the analytic hierarchy process is used to establish the weight. On the other hand, annual requisition land unification production value and comprehensive requisition land area price established by the county area of Huhhot have been studied, adopting price reckon method to make the requisition land area in the counties of Huhhot balanced in order to solve the problems of lacking of the joining because the differences in requisition land compensation standard between the areas.
Through the studies mentioned above, average standard of commonweal requisition land compensation and non-commonweal requisition land compensation have been got and those sort the same order, with the decrease order of the cantonal area, Tuoketuo county, Tumd zuoqi, Horinger County, Qingshuihe County and Wuchuan County. According to the average standard of commonweal requisition land compensation in the county area of Huhhot and taking the method of average weight to acreage as reference, requisition land area in the whole city has been plotted out 12 grades, with high grade distributing in the cantonal area and the highest grade of grade in the counties of Huhhot appearing in Tuoketuo county and the highest grade of grade in the counties of Huhhot appearing in Helinger county and Wuchuan county. As concluded above, requisition land compensation standard system has been formed in Huhhot.
引文
[1] R.科斯,A.阿尔钦,H.德姆塞茨,D.诺斯等.财产权利与制度变迁[M]上海:上海人民出版社,1994
[2]高延娜,朱道林.农地征收价格构成与土地增值的关系[J],中国土地科学, 2006,2(2):2-6
[3]中国土地学会土地经济分会第二次学术讨论会综述.征地价格的构成[J].中国土地科学,2002,16(4):46-47
[4]陈小君等.农村土地法律制度研究一田野调查解读[M].中国政法大学出版社,2004
[5]李明秋等.中国农村土地制度创新及农地使用权流转机制研究[M].中国大地出版社,2004
[6]沈守愚.论设立农地发展权的理论基础和重要意义[J].中国土地科学,1998,12(1):17-19
[7]孙弘.中国土地发展权研究-土地开发与资源保护的新视角[M].中国人民大学出版社,2004:45-49
[8]黄祖辉,汪晖.非公共利益性质的征地行为与土地发展权补偿[J].经济研究,2002,(5):66-71
[9]刘鹏凌,栾敬东.安徽省粮食补贴方式改革效果的调查与分析[J].农业经济问题,2004,(9):16-19
[10]杜业明.现行农村土地发展权制度的不均衡性及其变迁[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(1):4-8
[11]周诚.关于农地征用补偿问题-简答杜业明先生[J].中国土地,2005, (4):23-24
[12]季禾禾,周生路,冯昌中.试论我国农地发展权定位及农民分享实现[J].经济地理,2005,25(2):149-155
[13]刘慧芳.论我国农地地价的构成和量化[J].中国土地科学,2000, 14(3):15-17
[14]鲍海君,吴次芳.关于征地补偿问题的探讨[J],价格理论与实践,观察与思考:28-30
[15]张全景,王万茂.我国征地补偿制度改革探讨[J].国土与自然资源研究, 2003(4):22-24
[16]强真,朱道林等.农用地转用生态补偿价格评估理论初探[J].中国国土资源经济, 2005(2):36-40
[17]黄贤金.农地价格论[M].中国农业出版社,1996:14-110
[18]单胜道.成本逼近法及其在农地评估中的应用[J].资源科学,2002,24(6):18-21
[19]单胜道,尤建新.土地外部经济初步研究[J].资源科学. 2002,24(2):56-59
[20]王世忠,刘卫东,韦优.基于统一年产值标准的征地补偿测算方法研究—以广西壮族自治区都安县例[J].中国土地科学, 2006,20(5):13-19
[21]William A .Fischel and Perry Shapiro . Takings,insurance, and michelman:omments on economicinterpretations of just compensation law[J].Journal of Legal Studies,1988,17(2):269-293
[22]Kahneman D,Knetsch J L,Thaler R H. Anoma-lies--the endowment effect,loss aversion,and Status quo bias[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,1991,5(1):193-206
[23]周飞.土地征用制度改革的理论分析与实证研究.南京师范大学[D],2005.5
[24]王瑞雪,张安录等.近年国外农地价值评估方法研究进展述评[J].中国土地科学,2005,19(3):59-64
[25]Alston J. An Analysis of Growth of U. S. Farmland Pricing [J] .Amer. J. Agri. Econ.1986,(68):1-9
[26]Featherstone, A and Baker. An examination of Farmland Pricing [J] .Amer. J. Agri. Econ.1987,(69):532-546
[27]Alan Rendall.资源经济学-从经济角度对自然资源和环境政策的探讨[M],北京:商务印书馆,1989
[28]吕萍,孙琰华.国外农地转用价格的确定方法[J],中国土地科学2004,18(6):55-58
[29]毕宝德.土地经济学[M].中国人民大学出版社,2001:69-73
[30]陆大道.区位论及区域研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1987
[31]李小建.经济地理学[M].高等教育出版社,1999:52-110
[32]福田和晓.经济区位的理论与实践[M].东京:大名堂,1990:121-216
[33]黄朝奎.城乡地价一体化方法初步研究-以宜兴市为例[D].南京师范大学,2006.6
[34]王丹.征地补偿及其标准问题研究[D].南京师范大学,2007.5
[35]世界环境与发展委员会.我们共同的未来[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1997.
[36]王宝萍.论终身教育与人的可持续发展[J].中国成人教育,2002,6(12).
[37]国家计划委员会.中国21世纪议程[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1994.
[38]任浩.征地制度中地价补偿标准的研究[D].中国农业大学,2003.6
[39]谭仲春,曲福田,黄贤金.耕地资源可持续利用的经济分析与政策启示[J].农业环境与发展,1998,(4):4-6
[40]柳思维,唐红涛.经济转型中的新剪刀差与城乡消费差距的扩大[J].消费经济,2006,
[41]马洪,孙尚清.现代中国经济大事典[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1993:311-325
[42]肖国安.论市场经济条件下工农产品价格“剪刀差”[J].湘潭矿业学院学报,1997,12(3):77-82
[43]刘萍,付梅臣.收益还原法评估农用地价格有关问题探讨[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2007.2, 23(1):79-82
[44]李世涌、朱东恺、陈兆开.外部性理论及其内部化研究综述[J].学术研究,2007.8:117-119
[45]董德坤,朱道林,王霞.农用地非农化的外部性分析[J].经济问题,2004(4):55-57
[46]刘友芝.论负外部性内在化的一般途径[J].经济评论,2001(3):7-10
[47]田清旺,董政.关于庇古与科斯外部性校正理论初探[J].国家行政学院学报,2005(2):77-78
[48]孙海兵.农地外部效益研究[D].华中农业大学,2006.6
[49]张兰霞,王志文.外部性理论及其给予我们的几点启示[J].辽宁经济,1997(7):26-27
[50]向昀,任健.西方经济学界外部性理论研究介评[J].经济评论,2002,(3):58-62
[51]汪丁丁.哈耶克“扩展秩序”思想初论[EB].http//www.sinoliberal.com.2003
[52]胡静,陈银蓉.中国农地资源价值思考[J].商场现代化,2006(9):343-344
[53]汪峰.农地价值评估及其社会保障功能研究[D].浙江大学,2001.
[54]蔡银莺,李晓云,张安录.湖北省农地资源价值研究[J].自然资源学报,2007(1):121-130
[55]黄烈佳,张安录.农地价值与农地城市流转决策若干问题探讨[J].地理与地理信息科学,2006(3):88-91
[56]王舒曼,谭荣,吴丽梅.农地资源舒适性价值评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2005(11):720-724
[57]Bishop R C. Option value: an exposition and extension [J].Land Economics,1982(1):1-15
[58]梅昀,陈银蓉,胡伟艳.农用土地的价值观与农地转用价格[J].国土资源科技管理,2004(5):26-29
[59]王湃,张安录.农地价值构成及其评估方法研究[J].社会主义新农村建设理论月刊,2007(6):163-165
[60]刘劼莉.旅游环境价值经济评价法研究及其应用[D].四川大学,2005
[61]王顺祥.基于土地社会保障功能的征地补偿标准研究[J].国土资源,2004,(12):40-43
[62]张安录.城乡生态经济交错区农地城市流转机制与制度创新[J].中国农村经济,1999(7):43-49
[63]李风要.为失地农民解决长远生计—浙江省依法安置失地农民调查[J].国土资源报,2004.11
[64]杨红梅.征地补偿标准经济学研究[D].西南大学,2006.5
[65]呼和浩特市统计局.呼和浩特经济统计年鉴2007[M].中国统计出版社,2007.7
[66]国土资发[2005]144号.关于开展制订征地统一年产值标准和征地区片综合地价工作的通知
[67]梁鸿.农村居民生活风险与保障需求的研究[J].上海经济研究,2000(3)
[68]中华人民共和国土地管理法[M].北京:法律出版社, 2004.9
[69]恽建平.农用地土地还原利率的确定方法研究[J],安徽农业科学.2007,35(3):794-795
[70]殷仲民,张庭锋.耕地基准地价评估研究[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002.8
[71]王秋兵.土地资源学[M].中国农业出版社,2003.1(1):177—206
[72]杜丽娜.用层次分析法进行多属性决策[J].甘肃联合大学学报(自然科学版),2007.9,21(5):31-35
[73]戚黎蔚.AHP层次分析法在ITAT创业投资项目风险评估中的应用研究[D].上海交通大学,2008.6
[74]叶公强.地籍管理[M].中国农业出版社,2002.7:157-163
[75]王克强.经济发达地区地产对农户多重效用模型及实证研究—以浙江省海宁市为例[J].中国软科学,2000,4:6-8。
[76]刘远新.土地征用中失地农民社会保障问题研究—基于成都市六区一县的分析[D].四川农业大学,2005.5
[77]内蒙古自治区人民政府令.第102号
[78]《内蒙古自治区失业保险实施办法》
[79]《内蒙古自治区建立城镇职工基本医疗保险制度实施意见》
[80]卿尚华.从农用地价值功能和产权权益看征地补偿价格[D].西南师范大学
[2]高延娜,朱道林.农地征收价格构成与土地增值的关系[J],中国土地科学, 2006,2(2):2-6
[3]中国土地学会土地经济分会第二次学术讨论会综述.征地价格的构成[J].中国土地科学,2002,16(4):46-47
[4]陈小君等.农村土地法律制度研究一田野调查解读[M].中国政法大学出版社,2004
[5]李明秋等.中国农村土地制度创新及农地使用权流转机制研究[M].中国大地出版社,2004
[6]沈守愚.论设立农地发展权的理论基础和重要意义[J].中国土地科学,1998,12(1):17-19
[7]孙弘.中国土地发展权研究-土地开发与资源保护的新视角[M].中国人民大学出版社,2004:45-49
[8]黄祖辉,汪晖.非公共利益性质的征地行为与土地发展权补偿[J].经济研究,2002,(5):66-71
[9]刘鹏凌,栾敬东.安徽省粮食补贴方式改革效果的调查与分析[J].农业经济问题,2004,(9):16-19
[10]杜业明.现行农村土地发展权制度的不均衡性及其变迁[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(1):4-8
[11]周诚.关于农地征用补偿问题-简答杜业明先生[J].中国土地,2005, (4):23-24
[12]季禾禾,周生路,冯昌中.试论我国农地发展权定位及农民分享实现[J].经济地理,2005,25(2):149-155
[13]刘慧芳.论我国农地地价的构成和量化[J].中国土地科学,2000, 14(3):15-17
[14]鲍海君,吴次芳.关于征地补偿问题的探讨[J],价格理论与实践,观察与思考:28-30
[15]张全景,王万茂.我国征地补偿制度改革探讨[J].国土与自然资源研究, 2003(4):22-24
[16]强真,朱道林等.农用地转用生态补偿价格评估理论初探[J].中国国土资源经济, 2005(2):36-40
[17]黄贤金.农地价格论[M].中国农业出版社,1996:14-110
[18]单胜道.成本逼近法及其在农地评估中的应用[J].资源科学,2002,24(6):18-21
[19]单胜道,尤建新.土地外部经济初步研究[J].资源科学. 2002,24(2):56-59
[20]王世忠,刘卫东,韦优.基于统一年产值标准的征地补偿测算方法研究—以广西壮族自治区都安县例[J].中国土地科学, 2006,20(5):13-19
[21]William A .Fischel and Perry Shapiro . Takings,insurance, and michelman:omments on economicinterpretations of just compensation law[J].Journal of Legal Studies,1988,17(2):269-293
[22]Kahneman D,Knetsch J L,Thaler R H. Anoma-lies--the endowment effect,loss aversion,and Status quo bias[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,1991,5(1):193-206
[23]周飞.土地征用制度改革的理论分析与实证研究.南京师范大学[D],2005.5
[24]王瑞雪,张安录等.近年国外农地价值评估方法研究进展述评[J].中国土地科学,2005,19(3):59-64
[25]Alston J. An Analysis of Growth of U. S. Farmland Pricing [J] .Amer. J. Agri. Econ.1986,(68):1-9
[26]Featherstone, A and Baker. An examination of Farmland Pricing [J] .Amer. J. Agri. Econ.1987,(69):532-546
[27]Alan Rendall.资源经济学-从经济角度对自然资源和环境政策的探讨[M],北京:商务印书馆,1989
[28]吕萍,孙琰华.国外农地转用价格的确定方法[J],中国土地科学2004,18(6):55-58
[29]毕宝德.土地经济学[M].中国人民大学出版社,2001:69-73
[30]陆大道.区位论及区域研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1987
[31]李小建.经济地理学[M].高等教育出版社,1999:52-110
[32]福田和晓.经济区位的理论与实践[M].东京:大名堂,1990:121-216
[33]黄朝奎.城乡地价一体化方法初步研究-以宜兴市为例[D].南京师范大学,2006.6
[34]王丹.征地补偿及其标准问题研究[D].南京师范大学,2007.5
[35]世界环境与发展委员会.我们共同的未来[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1997.
[36]王宝萍.论终身教育与人的可持续发展[J].中国成人教育,2002,6(12).
[37]国家计划委员会.中国21世纪议程[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1994.
[38]任浩.征地制度中地价补偿标准的研究[D].中国农业大学,2003.6
[39]谭仲春,曲福田,黄贤金.耕地资源可持续利用的经济分析与政策启示[J].农业环境与发展,1998,(4):4-6
[40]柳思维,唐红涛.经济转型中的新剪刀差与城乡消费差距的扩大[J].消费经济,2006,
[41]马洪,孙尚清.现代中国经济大事典[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1993:311-325
[42]肖国安.论市场经济条件下工农产品价格“剪刀差”[J].湘潭矿业学院学报,1997,12(3):77-82
[43]刘萍,付梅臣.收益还原法评估农用地价格有关问题探讨[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2007.2, 23(1):79-82
[44]李世涌、朱东恺、陈兆开.外部性理论及其内部化研究综述[J].学术研究,2007.8:117-119
[45]董德坤,朱道林,王霞.农用地非农化的外部性分析[J].经济问题,2004(4):55-57
[46]刘友芝.论负外部性内在化的一般途径[J].经济评论,2001(3):7-10
[47]田清旺,董政.关于庇古与科斯外部性校正理论初探[J].国家行政学院学报,2005(2):77-78
[48]孙海兵.农地外部效益研究[D].华中农业大学,2006.6
[49]张兰霞,王志文.外部性理论及其给予我们的几点启示[J].辽宁经济,1997(7):26-27
[50]向昀,任健.西方经济学界外部性理论研究介评[J].经济评论,2002,(3):58-62
[51]汪丁丁.哈耶克“扩展秩序”思想初论[EB].http//www.sinoliberal.com.2003
[52]胡静,陈银蓉.中国农地资源价值思考[J].商场现代化,2006(9):343-344
[53]汪峰.农地价值评估及其社会保障功能研究[D].浙江大学,2001.
[54]蔡银莺,李晓云,张安录.湖北省农地资源价值研究[J].自然资源学报,2007(1):121-130
[55]黄烈佳,张安录.农地价值与农地城市流转决策若干问题探讨[J].地理与地理信息科学,2006(3):88-91
[56]王舒曼,谭荣,吴丽梅.农地资源舒适性价值评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2005(11):720-724
[57]Bishop R C. Option value: an exposition and extension [J].Land Economics,1982(1):1-15
[58]梅昀,陈银蓉,胡伟艳.农用土地的价值观与农地转用价格[J].国土资源科技管理,2004(5):26-29
[59]王湃,张安录.农地价值构成及其评估方法研究[J].社会主义新农村建设理论月刊,2007(6):163-165
[60]刘劼莉.旅游环境价值经济评价法研究及其应用[D].四川大学,2005
[61]王顺祥.基于土地社会保障功能的征地补偿标准研究[J].国土资源,2004,(12):40-43
[62]张安录.城乡生态经济交错区农地城市流转机制与制度创新[J].中国农村经济,1999(7):43-49
[63]李风要.为失地农民解决长远生计—浙江省依法安置失地农民调查[J].国土资源报,2004.11
[64]杨红梅.征地补偿标准经济学研究[D].西南大学,2006.5
[65]呼和浩特市统计局.呼和浩特经济统计年鉴2007[M].中国统计出版社,2007.7
[66]国土资发[2005]144号.关于开展制订征地统一年产值标准和征地区片综合地价工作的通知
[67]梁鸿.农村居民生活风险与保障需求的研究[J].上海经济研究,2000(3)
[68]中华人民共和国土地管理法[M].北京:法律出版社, 2004.9
[69]恽建平.农用地土地还原利率的确定方法研究[J],安徽农业科学.2007,35(3):794-795
[70]殷仲民,张庭锋.耕地基准地价评估研究[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002.8
[71]王秋兵.土地资源学[M].中国农业出版社,2003.1(1):177—206
[72]杜丽娜.用层次分析法进行多属性决策[J].甘肃联合大学学报(自然科学版),2007.9,21(5):31-35
[73]戚黎蔚.AHP层次分析法在ITAT创业投资项目风险评估中的应用研究[D].上海交通大学,2008.6
[74]叶公强.地籍管理[M].中国农业出版社,2002.7:157-163
[75]王克强.经济发达地区地产对农户多重效用模型及实证研究—以浙江省海宁市为例[J].中国软科学,2000,4:6-8。
[76]刘远新.土地征用中失地农民社会保障问题研究—基于成都市六区一县的分析[D].四川农业大学,2005.5
[77]内蒙古自治区人民政府令.第102号
[78]《内蒙古自治区失业保险实施办法》
[79]《内蒙古自治区建立城镇职工基本医疗保险制度实施意见》
[80]卿尚华.从农用地价值功能和产权权益看征地补偿价格[D].西南师范大学