松辽盆地树25-尚2区块构造演化与油气富集规律研究
|
摘要
树25-尚2区块位于松辽盆地中央坳陷区三肇凹陷东翼,处于西倾的单斜背景之上,区内发育了三个三级构造即北部的尚家鼻状构造,西南部的榆树林构造与和东南部的郝家粉房构造。扶余、杨大城子油层为本论文的主要研究层位。本文从构造精细解释、断裂系统划分、构造演化史研究、油水关系特征和石油富集规律五个方面进行了综合分析研究。取得主要成果如下:
1、研究区总体形态呈西南低东北高的构造格局,地层倾角变化相对较缓,扶余和杨大城子油层顶面构造具有良好的继承性。
2、区内断层发育且全部为正断层,平面上划分为四个断裂条带,剖面上表现为堑垒相间的发育特点。本区共划分四期断裂,其中以中、晚期断裂最为发育,同时与油气运移与聚集关系最为紧密。
3、通过平衡剖面研究,区内扶余油层自泉头组开始沉积,至嫩江组末期基本定型,期间共经历了四期演化阶段,即泉三段-泉四段沉积时期的稳定下沉阶段,青山口组-姚一段沉积时期的强烈伸展阶段,姚二、三段沉积时期的稳定下沉阶段和嫩一、二段沉积时期的快速沉降阶段。
4、由于断层发育,研究区内油气藏类型主要以断层油气藏为主,断层-岩性油气藏为辅,透镜状的岩性油气藏数量很少。油藏剖面及平面油水关系显示区内主要含油小层集中在扶一段和杨一段,不存在统一的油水界面。
5、区内主要的成藏方式有地垒式成藏、阶梯式成藏和地堑式成藏,其中地垒式好于阶梯式好于地堑式。研究区油气为三肇凹陷侧向运移成藏,油井主要分布在断裂带附近且西部多于东部,东部油井产油层位高于西部。
Shu 25-Shang 2 Blocks are located in the east of Sanzhao sag, central depression area, Songliao basin,characterized by westward monocline. There are developed three third-grade structure units in the area, such as nose-like, Yushulin and Haojiafenfang structures. Fuyu & Yangdachengzi (FuYang) Oil layers as main target strata are mainly studied by comprehensive analysis of seismic interpretation, fracture system, tectonic evolution, oil-water relationship and petroleum enrichment in this paper.
1. The structure in research area is characterized by low in southwest and high in northeast with few changes in stratums dip angles, in which FuYang reservoirs are characterized by good inheritance.
2. Faults in the study area are normal faults which are classified into four zones in plans and display a horst-graben developing mode. Faults are classified as four stages, among which medium and late faults are developed, closely connected with oil-gas migration and accumulation.
3. By using balanced cross-section technology, it is indicated that FuYang oil layers in Shu 25-Shang 2 Blocks began to deposit in Quantou period, and nearly formed in the end of Nenjiang period, experienced four tectonic evolution stages, such as steady subsidence stage of K1q3-K1q4, intensive extension stage of K2q- K2y1, steady subsidence stage of K2y2-K2y3 and reversion stage of late K2n.
4. As faults developed very well in the study area, there mainly exist fault-trap reservoirs, followed by fault-lithologic reservoirs, and lenticular-shape lithologic reservoirs are few. Reservoir profile and the relationships between the planar oil and water indicate that small oil layers mainly accumulated in F-I and Y-I members, no unified oil-water interface occurs.
5. The main reserving ways in select area are horst-reservoir, step-reservoir and graben–reservoir, among which the first one is best and the last one is worst. The hydrocarbon accumulation was migrated laterally from SanZhao depression. Oil Wells are mainly distributed along the fault zone nearby and more in west than the east, while the height of oil formation is on the contrary. Keywords: Fuyang reservoir; fault features; balancing cross-section; tectonic evolution; oil accumulation; Shu 25-Shang 2 Blocks
1、研究区总体形态呈西南低东北高的构造格局,地层倾角变化相对较缓,扶余和杨大城子油层顶面构造具有良好的继承性。
2、区内断层发育且全部为正断层,平面上划分为四个断裂条带,剖面上表现为堑垒相间的发育特点。本区共划分四期断裂,其中以中、晚期断裂最为发育,同时与油气运移与聚集关系最为紧密。
3、通过平衡剖面研究,区内扶余油层自泉头组开始沉积,至嫩江组末期基本定型,期间共经历了四期演化阶段,即泉三段-泉四段沉积时期的稳定下沉阶段,青山口组-姚一段沉积时期的强烈伸展阶段,姚二、三段沉积时期的稳定下沉阶段和嫩一、二段沉积时期的快速沉降阶段。
4、由于断层发育,研究区内油气藏类型主要以断层油气藏为主,断层-岩性油气藏为辅,透镜状的岩性油气藏数量很少。油藏剖面及平面油水关系显示区内主要含油小层集中在扶一段和杨一段,不存在统一的油水界面。
5、区内主要的成藏方式有地垒式成藏、阶梯式成藏和地堑式成藏,其中地垒式好于阶梯式好于地堑式。研究区油气为三肇凹陷侧向运移成藏,油井主要分布在断裂带附近且西部多于东部,东部油井产油层位高于西部。
Shu 25-Shang 2 Blocks are located in the east of Sanzhao sag, central depression area, Songliao basin,characterized by westward monocline. There are developed three third-grade structure units in the area, such as nose-like, Yushulin and Haojiafenfang structures. Fuyu & Yangdachengzi (FuYang) Oil layers as main target strata are mainly studied by comprehensive analysis of seismic interpretation, fracture system, tectonic evolution, oil-water relationship and petroleum enrichment in this paper.
1. The structure in research area is characterized by low in southwest and high in northeast with few changes in stratums dip angles, in which FuYang reservoirs are characterized by good inheritance.
2. Faults in the study area are normal faults which are classified into four zones in plans and display a horst-graben developing mode. Faults are classified as four stages, among which medium and late faults are developed, closely connected with oil-gas migration and accumulation.
3. By using balanced cross-section technology, it is indicated that FuYang oil layers in Shu 25-Shang 2 Blocks began to deposit in Quantou period, and nearly formed in the end of Nenjiang period, experienced four tectonic evolution stages, such as steady subsidence stage of K1q3-K1q4, intensive extension stage of K2q- K2y1, steady subsidence stage of K2y2-K2y3 and reversion stage of late K2n.
4. As faults developed very well in the study area, there mainly exist fault-trap reservoirs, followed by fault-lithologic reservoirs, and lenticular-shape lithologic reservoirs are few. Reservoir profile and the relationships between the planar oil and water indicate that small oil layers mainly accumulated in F-I and Y-I members, no unified oil-water interface occurs.
5. The main reserving ways in select area are horst-reservoir, step-reservoir and graben–reservoir, among which the first one is best and the last one is worst. The hydrocarbon accumulation was migrated laterally from SanZhao depression. Oil Wells are mainly distributed along the fault zone nearby and more in west than the east, while the height of oil formation is on the contrary. Keywords: Fuyang reservoir; fault features; balancing cross-section; tectonic evolution; oil accumulation; Shu 25-Shang 2 Blocks
引文
Allan U S. A Model for the Migration and Entrapment of Hydrocarbon within Faulted structures. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73, 803-811.
Allen P A, Allen J R. Basin Analysis: Principles and Applications. Oxford:Blackwell, 1990:28-48.
Bally A W, Gordy P L, Stewart G A. Structure seismicdata and orogenic evolution of southern Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 1966, 14(1):337-381.
Berg R R, Avery A H. Sealing properties of Teritary growth faults, Texas GulfCoast. AAPG Bulletin, 1995, 79:375-393.
Bouvier J D, Kaars-sijpesteijn C H, Onyejekwe C.C, et al. Three-dimensional seismic interetation and fault sealing investigation, Nun River Field, Nigerial. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73(11):1397-1414.
Chamberlin R T. The building of the Colorado Rockies. J.Geol., 1919, 27:225-251.
Dahlstrom C D. A balanced cross sections. Can. J. Geosci, 1969, 6(2):743-759.
Dow W.G. Application of oil-correlation and source rock data to exploration in Williston basin. AAPG Bulletin, 1974, 58(7):1253-1262.
Dow W.G. Kerogen studies and geological interpretation. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1977, 7(2):77-79.
Elliott, D. The construction of balanced cross-sections. Journal of Structural Geology, 1983, 5:100-103.
Hossack J R. The use of balanced cross-sections in the calculation of orogenic contraction. J. Geol. Soc., 1979, 136:705-711.
Lindsay N G, Murphy F C, Walsh J J, et al. Outcrop studies of shale mear on fault surface. International Association of Sedimentologists Special Pubulication, 1993, 15(4);113-123.
Magoon L B. Identified petroleum systems within the United States. USGS Bulletin, 1992, 27(2):2-11.
Magoon L B. The petroleum system-a classifications cheme for research, resourceassessment and exploration. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(5):587-596.
Perrodon and Masse P. Subsidence sedimentation and petroleum systems. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1984, 7(1):5-26.
Ramsay J G, Huber M I. The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology Folds and Fractures. London, Academic, 1987.
Sanderson D J. The determination of compaction strains using quasi-cylindrical objects. Tectonophysics, 1976, 30:25-32.
Wood D S. Current view of the development of slaty cleavage. Ann. Rev. Earth Sci., 1974,2:369-401.
陈发景,汪新文,陈昭年,等.伸展断陷盆地分析.北京:地质出版社,2004.
陈发景,汪新文,张光亚,等.中国中、新生代前陆盆地的构造特征和地球动力学.地球科学:中国地质大学学报,1996,21(4):366-372.
陈均亮,蔡希源,林春华,等.松辽盆地北部断陷盆地构造特征与幕式演化.石油学报,1999,20(4):15-20.
陈昭年,陈布科.松辽盆地反转构造与油气聚集.成都理工学院学报,1996,23(4):50-55.
陈昭年,陈发景.松辽盆地反转构造运动学特征.现代地质,1996,10(3):390-396.
陈昭年,王小敏,陈珊,等.松辽盆地朝长地区扶余油层的构造演化.现代地质,2008,22(4):512-519.
迟元林,萧德铭,殷进垠.松辽盆地三肇地区上生下储“注入式”成藏机制.地质学报,2000,74(4):371-377.
付广,王有功.源外鼻状构造区油运移输导通道及对成藏的作用.地质评论,2008,54(5):46-51.
付广,薛永超,张发强.欠压实泥质源岩异常含气浓度的研究方法.断块油气田,1999,6(6):13-16.
付晓飞,李兆影,卢双舫,等.利用声波时差资料恢复剥蚀量方法研究与应用.大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(1):9-11.
付晓飞,宋岩.松辽盆地三肇凹陷“T11”多边形断层非构造成因机制探讨.地质学报,2008,82(6):739-749.
高瑞琪,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律.北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
何将启,周祖翼,江兴歌.优化孔隙度法计算地层剥蚀厚度:原理及实例.石油实验地质,2002,24(6):561-565.
胡朝元,廖曦.成油系统概念在中国的提出及其应用.石油学报,1996,17(1):10-16.
胡朝元.生油区控制油气田分布-中国东部陆相盆地进行区域勘探的有效理论.石油学报,1982,13(2):9-14.
胡圣标,汪集晠,张容燕.利用镜质体反射率数据估算地层剥蚀厚度.石油勘探与开发,1999,26(4):42-45.
胡望水,吕炳全,张文军,等.松辽盆地构造演化及成盆动力学探讨.地质评论,2005,40(1):16-31.
胡望水.松辽盆地北部正反转构造与油气聚集.天然气工业,1996,16(5):20-24.
靳广兴,卓勤功.东濮凹陷东营组地层剥蚀厚度恢复.断块油气田,2006,13(6):18-20.
姜素华,查明,张善文.网毯式油气成藏体系的动态平衡研究[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,2004,28(4):16-20.
李德生,何登发.中国西北地区沉积盆地石油地质.海相油气地质,2002,7(1):2-6.
李景坤,宋兰斌,刘伟.松辽盆地北部石炭——二叠系古镜质体反射率恢复.大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(3):32-34.
刘宝柱,姜呈馥,杨亚娟.松辽盆地南部正反转构造与油气成藏关系.大庆石油地质与开发,1998,17(2):10-12.
刘景彦,林畅松,喻岳任,等.用声波测井资料计算剥蚀量的方法改进.石油实验地质,2000,22(4):302-306.
卢双舫,刘新颖,王振平,等.松辽盆地深层剥蚀量探讨及其意义.大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(1):20-22.
罗开平,周祖翼,何治亮.含油气系统理论在中国盆地研究中的应用与发展.石油实验地质,2007,29(2):143-148.
罗群,姜振学,庞雄奇.断裂控藏机理与模式.北京:石油工业出版社,2007.
马贡L B.含油气系统:研究现状和方法(杨瑞召,周庆凡,汪时成,译).北京:地质出版社,1992.
毛小平,吴冲龙,袁艳斌.三维构造模拟方法——体平衡技术研究.地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1999,12(5):32-34.
庞雄奇,李丕龙,张善文,等.陆相断陷盆地相-势耦合控藏作用及其基本模式[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(5):641-652.
彭清华,周江羽,揭异新.声波时差法对南堡凹陷东营组剥蚀量的恢复.断块油气田,2009,16(6):50-52.
漆家福,杨桥,陈发景,等.辽东湾—下辽河盆地新生代构造的运动学特征及其演化过程.现代地质,1994,8(1):1-9.
邱家骧,陶奎元,赵俊磊,等.火山岩.北京:地质出版社,1997.
尚可耘,贾健谊,周机翼,等.利用声波测井数据估算西湖凹陷地层剥蚀量.海洋石油,2001,109(3):12-51.
施立志,林铁峰,吴海波等.松辽盆地尚家—太平川地区石油地质条件及勘探方向分析. 地质科学,2008,43(3):558-568.
宋国奇.含油气盆地成藏组合理论初步探讨[J].油气地质与采收率,2002,9(5):4-7.
王璞珺,杜小弟,王俊,等.松辽盆地白垩系年代地层研究及地层时代划分[J].地质学报,1995,69(4):372-380.
伍松柏.东营凹陷“相-势”控藏作用原理分析及思索[J].海洋石油,2008,28(2):46-51.
向才富,冯志强,庞雄奇,等.松辽盆地晚期热历史及其构造意义:磷灰石裂变径迹(AFT)证据.中国科学(D辑),2007,37(8):1024-1031.
辛仁臣,李思田.大庆油田成藏条件及油气系统研究.现代地质,1999,13(1):1-10.
张功成,梁慧社,徐宏,等.平衡剖面正演模拟技术在松辽盆地构造分析中的应用.西安石油学院学报,1999,14(2):1-4.
张功成,朱德丰,周章保.松辽盆地伸展和反转构造样式.石油勘探与开发,1996,23(2):16-20.
张庆石,张吉,张庆晨.应用波动分析法研究三肇深层沉积剥蚀史.大庆石油地质与发,2001,20(6):23-24.
张荣强,吴时国,周雁,等.平衡剖面技术及其在济阳坳陷桩海地区的应用.海洋地质与第四纪地质,2008,28(6):135-141.
张善文,王永诗,石砥石,等.网毯式油气成藏体系—以济阳坳陷新近系为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(1):1-9.
张一伟,李京吕,金之钧,等.原型盆地剥蚀量计算的新方法一波动分析法.石油与大然气地质,2000,21(l):88-91.
赵力彬,黄志龙,李君,等.包裹体测温法在剥蚀厚度恢复中的应用.新疆石油地质,2005,26(5):580-583.
赵孟为.磷灰石裂变径迹分析在恢复盆地沉降抬升史中的应用──以鄂尔多斯盆地为例. 地球物理学报,1996,39(S1):239-244.
周祖翼,廖宗廷,杨凤丽,等.裂变径迹分析及其在沉积盆地研究中的应用.石油实验地质,2001,23(3):332-337.
朱夏.论中国含油气盆地构造.北京:石油工业出版社,1986.
Allen P A, Allen J R. Basin Analysis: Principles and Applications. Oxford:Blackwell, 1990:28-48.
Bally A W, Gordy P L, Stewart G A. Structure seismicdata and orogenic evolution of southern Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 1966, 14(1):337-381.
Berg R R, Avery A H. Sealing properties of Teritary growth faults, Texas GulfCoast. AAPG Bulletin, 1995, 79:375-393.
Bouvier J D, Kaars-sijpesteijn C H, Onyejekwe C.C, et al. Three-dimensional seismic interetation and fault sealing investigation, Nun River Field, Nigerial. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73(11):1397-1414.
Chamberlin R T. The building of the Colorado Rockies. J.Geol., 1919, 27:225-251.
Dahlstrom C D. A balanced cross sections. Can. J. Geosci, 1969, 6(2):743-759.
Dow W.G. Application of oil-correlation and source rock data to exploration in Williston basin. AAPG Bulletin, 1974, 58(7):1253-1262.
Dow W.G. Kerogen studies and geological interpretation. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1977, 7(2):77-79.
Elliott, D. The construction of balanced cross-sections. Journal of Structural Geology, 1983, 5:100-103.
Hossack J R. The use of balanced cross-sections in the calculation of orogenic contraction. J. Geol. Soc., 1979, 136:705-711.
Lindsay N G, Murphy F C, Walsh J J, et al. Outcrop studies of shale mear on fault surface. International Association of Sedimentologists Special Pubulication, 1993, 15(4);113-123.
Magoon L B. Identified petroleum systems within the United States. USGS Bulletin, 1992, 27(2):2-11.
Magoon L B. The petroleum system-a classifications cheme for research, resourceassessment and exploration. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(5):587-596.
Perrodon and Masse P. Subsidence sedimentation and petroleum systems. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1984, 7(1):5-26.
Ramsay J G, Huber M I. The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology Folds and Fractures. London, Academic, 1987.
Sanderson D J. The determination of compaction strains using quasi-cylindrical objects. Tectonophysics, 1976, 30:25-32.
Wood D S. Current view of the development of slaty cleavage. Ann. Rev. Earth Sci., 1974,2:369-401.
陈发景,汪新文,陈昭年,等.伸展断陷盆地分析.北京:地质出版社,2004.
陈发景,汪新文,张光亚,等.中国中、新生代前陆盆地的构造特征和地球动力学.地球科学:中国地质大学学报,1996,21(4):366-372.
陈均亮,蔡希源,林春华,等.松辽盆地北部断陷盆地构造特征与幕式演化.石油学报,1999,20(4):15-20.
陈昭年,陈布科.松辽盆地反转构造与油气聚集.成都理工学院学报,1996,23(4):50-55.
陈昭年,陈发景.松辽盆地反转构造运动学特征.现代地质,1996,10(3):390-396.
陈昭年,王小敏,陈珊,等.松辽盆地朝长地区扶余油层的构造演化.现代地质,2008,22(4):512-519.
迟元林,萧德铭,殷进垠.松辽盆地三肇地区上生下储“注入式”成藏机制.地质学报,2000,74(4):371-377.
付广,王有功.源外鼻状构造区油运移输导通道及对成藏的作用.地质评论,2008,54(5):46-51.
付广,薛永超,张发强.欠压实泥质源岩异常含气浓度的研究方法.断块油气田,1999,6(6):13-16.
付晓飞,李兆影,卢双舫,等.利用声波时差资料恢复剥蚀量方法研究与应用.大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(1):9-11.
付晓飞,宋岩.松辽盆地三肇凹陷“T11”多边形断层非构造成因机制探讨.地质学报,2008,82(6):739-749.
高瑞琪,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律.北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
何将启,周祖翼,江兴歌.优化孔隙度法计算地层剥蚀厚度:原理及实例.石油实验地质,2002,24(6):561-565.
胡朝元,廖曦.成油系统概念在中国的提出及其应用.石油学报,1996,17(1):10-16.
胡朝元.生油区控制油气田分布-中国东部陆相盆地进行区域勘探的有效理论.石油学报,1982,13(2):9-14.
胡圣标,汪集晠,张容燕.利用镜质体反射率数据估算地层剥蚀厚度.石油勘探与开发,1999,26(4):42-45.
胡望水,吕炳全,张文军,等.松辽盆地构造演化及成盆动力学探讨.地质评论,2005,40(1):16-31.
胡望水.松辽盆地北部正反转构造与油气聚集.天然气工业,1996,16(5):20-24.
靳广兴,卓勤功.东濮凹陷东营组地层剥蚀厚度恢复.断块油气田,2006,13(6):18-20.
姜素华,查明,张善文.网毯式油气成藏体系的动态平衡研究[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,2004,28(4):16-20.
李德生,何登发.中国西北地区沉积盆地石油地质.海相油气地质,2002,7(1):2-6.
李景坤,宋兰斌,刘伟.松辽盆地北部石炭——二叠系古镜质体反射率恢复.大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(3):32-34.
刘宝柱,姜呈馥,杨亚娟.松辽盆地南部正反转构造与油气成藏关系.大庆石油地质与开发,1998,17(2):10-12.
刘景彦,林畅松,喻岳任,等.用声波测井资料计算剥蚀量的方法改进.石油实验地质,2000,22(4):302-306.
卢双舫,刘新颖,王振平,等.松辽盆地深层剥蚀量探讨及其意义.大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(1):20-22.
罗开平,周祖翼,何治亮.含油气系统理论在中国盆地研究中的应用与发展.石油实验地质,2007,29(2):143-148.
罗群,姜振学,庞雄奇.断裂控藏机理与模式.北京:石油工业出版社,2007.
马贡L B.含油气系统:研究现状和方法(杨瑞召,周庆凡,汪时成,译).北京:地质出版社,1992.
毛小平,吴冲龙,袁艳斌.三维构造模拟方法——体平衡技术研究.地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1999,12(5):32-34.
庞雄奇,李丕龙,张善文,等.陆相断陷盆地相-势耦合控藏作用及其基本模式[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(5):641-652.
彭清华,周江羽,揭异新.声波时差法对南堡凹陷东营组剥蚀量的恢复.断块油气田,2009,16(6):50-52.
漆家福,杨桥,陈发景,等.辽东湾—下辽河盆地新生代构造的运动学特征及其演化过程.现代地质,1994,8(1):1-9.
邱家骧,陶奎元,赵俊磊,等.火山岩.北京:地质出版社,1997.
尚可耘,贾健谊,周机翼,等.利用声波测井数据估算西湖凹陷地层剥蚀量.海洋石油,2001,109(3):12-51.
施立志,林铁峰,吴海波等.松辽盆地尚家—太平川地区石油地质条件及勘探方向分析. 地质科学,2008,43(3):558-568.
宋国奇.含油气盆地成藏组合理论初步探讨[J].油气地质与采收率,2002,9(5):4-7.
王璞珺,杜小弟,王俊,等.松辽盆地白垩系年代地层研究及地层时代划分[J].地质学报,1995,69(4):372-380.
伍松柏.东营凹陷“相-势”控藏作用原理分析及思索[J].海洋石油,2008,28(2):46-51.
向才富,冯志强,庞雄奇,等.松辽盆地晚期热历史及其构造意义:磷灰石裂变径迹(AFT)证据.中国科学(D辑),2007,37(8):1024-1031.
辛仁臣,李思田.大庆油田成藏条件及油气系统研究.现代地质,1999,13(1):1-10.
张功成,梁慧社,徐宏,等.平衡剖面正演模拟技术在松辽盆地构造分析中的应用.西安石油学院学报,1999,14(2):1-4.
张功成,朱德丰,周章保.松辽盆地伸展和反转构造样式.石油勘探与开发,1996,23(2):16-20.
张庆石,张吉,张庆晨.应用波动分析法研究三肇深层沉积剥蚀史.大庆石油地质与发,2001,20(6):23-24.
张荣强,吴时国,周雁,等.平衡剖面技术及其在济阳坳陷桩海地区的应用.海洋地质与第四纪地质,2008,28(6):135-141.
张善文,王永诗,石砥石,等.网毯式油气成藏体系—以济阳坳陷新近系为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(1):1-9.
张一伟,李京吕,金之钧,等.原型盆地剥蚀量计算的新方法一波动分析法.石油与大然气地质,2000,21(l):88-91.
赵力彬,黄志龙,李君,等.包裹体测温法在剥蚀厚度恢复中的应用.新疆石油地质,2005,26(5):580-583.
赵孟为.磷灰石裂变径迹分析在恢复盆地沉降抬升史中的应用──以鄂尔多斯盆地为例. 地球物理学报,1996,39(S1):239-244.
周祖翼,廖宗廷,杨凤丽,等.裂变径迹分析及其在沉积盆地研究中的应用.石油实验地质,2001,23(3):332-337.
朱夏.论中国含油气盆地构造.北京:石油工业出版社,1986.