摘要
滑坡是一种多发性的地质灾害,在全球范围内分布广泛,危害极为严重。它不仅给人民生命安全带来了威胁,而且对财产、环境、资源等具有破坏性。我国是一个滑坡灾害多发的国家,因此加强滑坡灾害的研究和防治减灾工作迫在眉睫。青川县马鹿乡老鹰岩1#滑坡是基岩山区发育的土质滑坡,滑坡具有三级滑面。滑坡局部发生了变形滑移,威胁着附近居民安全和道路的畅通。本文在综合现场详细地质测绘、勘探和前人研究成果基础上,对老鹰岩1#滑坡堆积体特征、成因及机理作了详细分析。从其生成的地质环境和变形特征分析入手,论述了滑坡形成的内在因素。同时,利用极限平衡分析方法与计算机三维数值仿真模拟方法重点对滑坡第三级滑面变形滑动部分的稳定性进行了深入研究,并对滑坡的治理进行了优化设计。得到以下主要研究成果:
(1)通过对地质勘探资料和现场勘察结果分析,老鹰岩1#滑坡是老鹰岩滑坡堆积体局部复活并受降雨的影响发生蠕滑变形,滑面尚未完全贯通,并有三个蠕滑变形带(面);目前滑坡体第三级滑面处于复活蠕滑过程中,若遇强降雨或长期降雨过程,该滑坡第三级滑面会产生加速蠕滑,导致滑坡堆积体进一步的变形破坏。
(2)应用FLAC3D程序进行数值模拟分析,结果表明,天然状态下老鹰岩1#滑坡整体目前处于蠕滑状态,滑体内局部出现失稳现象,变形主要位于第三级滑面之中,第一、二级滑面未见变形。将计算成果对比老鹰岩1#滑坡实地考察和地质分析可知,其分析成果是基本一致的,表明老鹰岩1#滑坡的计算模型、参数取值是合理的。
(3)通过对滑坡区内滑面分析,特别是对三级滑面的研究,来评价由于滑坡侧缘被冲沟冲刷侵蚀产生泥石流的可能性分析以及在地震和暴雨工况下所形成的滑坡的稳定性,应用传递系数法进行稳定性计算,进而评定滑坡的稳定性。在此基础上,本文针对该滑坡特点提出了采用“设置排水系统+挡土墙+谷坊坝”治理的有效措施。该方案的实施,大大提高了第三级滑体的稳定性,同时对滑坡的整体稳定性也是有利的,能对滑坡整治达到一定的效果。
(4)将滑坡实际地质分析判断分析结果与数值模拟分析结果相对比,结果表明其分析成果是基本吻合的,且滑动面位置与采用地质资料分析章节中反映的位置也是完全一致,证明数值模拟分析与地质分析结果是可行的,比较符合工程实际。
Landslide is a major multiple geographical hazard, which spreads all over the world and does a great damage. It not only damages human’s life but also does destructiveness to people’s property、environment and resources. Landslide happens a lot in our country and will augment in a long time. So it is emergency to enhance the study of landslide hazard and work of prevention and cure. Malu of Qingchuan eagle rock 1# landslide is the earthiness landslide, which develops in the bedrock mountain area, with three-level slip plane. As for part of the landslide deformed and glided, it threats the safety of nearby inhabitants and blocks the way. The essay is based on the detailed geographical mapping、proving locus in quo and pre-research result and analysed the character of eagle rock 1# landslide accumulation、cause and mechanism in detail. It begins with the geographical environment-poietic and deformation character. We discussed the inner factors of slope formation. Meanwhile, the essay used the method of limit equilibrium assay and 3D numerical value simulation analogy procedure to do profound research to the stability of deformation and slide of the third grade slip plane. We make the optimized design to the management of the landslide and obtain the following major research result:
(1) Through the analysis of the geographical exploration data and locus in quo investigation result, we know that eagle rock 1# slide is part of the rejuvenation of eagle rock slide accumulation which creep and deform under the effect of the rainfall, and the slip plane is not completely holing-through, accompanying three creep and deformation belt(plane); Now the third grade slip plane of landslide mass is under the process of rejuvenation and creep, which will creep fast, leading to the futher deformation and failure of landslide accumulation when meet strong rainfall or long term rainfall.
(2) To utilize the FLAC3D progam to perform numerical simulation, it indicates that now the entirety of eagle rock 1# landslide is in the creep and slide state in natural condition, part of the sliding mass show destabilizing. The deformation is mainly located in the third grade slip plane while there is no deformation in latent the fist and the second slip plane. While calculate the result to compare the on the spot investigation with geographical analyses we know that the analysis result is primarily concordant,which indicates that the calculation model and parameter setting of eagle rock 1# landslide is reasonable.
(3) Through the analysis of slip plane in landslide zone, especially the study of three-level slip plane, to evaluate the possibility of producing debris flow by the gully erosion to the landslide lateral and the landslide stability under the condition of the earthquake and hard rain, taking stability calculation with transfer coefficient method, and assess stability of landslide. On this basis, the essay aim directly at the feature of the landslide and introduced effective measure of“Setup drainage system+ retaining wall + check dam”to cure the landslide. The enforcement of the scheme dramatically raises the stability of the third grade sliding mass, does benefits to the entire stability of landslide and cure landslide in a certain degree.
(4) To take comparison between actual geological analysis result and numerical simulation analysis result of the landslide, it indicates that the analysis result is primarily concordant, also the location of slip surface is completely concordant with the location that is reflected in the geographical data analysis chapter, which proves that numerical simulation analysis and geographical analysis is feasible and is basically fit for engineering practice.
引文
[1]张倬元,王士天,王兰生.工程地质分析原理(第二版)[M],北京:地质出版社,1994
[2]徐开礼.构造地质学.地质出版社.1987.4
[3] Tomio Ito,Tamotsu Matsui,Won Pyo Hong.Design method for stabilizing piles against Iandslide—one row of piles[J].Soils and Foundtions,1981,21(1):21-37
[4] Afshin Montaktiab and J. M.Cacison:Avalanches, transport, and local equilibrium in self-organized criticality[J].Physical Review E.1998,58(5):5608-5619
[5] DONALD I,CHEN Z Y. Slope stability analysis by the upper bound approach: Fundamentals and methods[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1977, 34(6): 853-862
[6]王恭先,徐峻龄,刘光代,李传珠.滑坡学与滑坡防治技术[M].中国铁道出版社,2004
[7] E,Eberhard ,K.Thurol,M.Luginbuehl.Slope instability mechanisms in dipping Interbedded conglomerates and weathered marls-the 1999 Rufi landslidded, Switzerland.Engineering Geology.2005,77:35~56
[8]张悼元.滑坡防治工程的现状与发展展望.地质灾害与环境保护.20002(11):89~97
[9]郑颖人,赵尚毅.用有限元强度折减法求滑(边)坡支挡结构的内力.岩石力学与工程学报.2004,23(20):3552~3558
[10]《滑坡文集》编辑委员会.《滑坡文集》(第十六集).中国铁道出版社.2003
[11]赵尚毅,郑颖人等,基于Drucker一Prager准则的边坡安全系数定义及其转换.岩土力学与工程学报.2006,25(增1):2730~2734
[12]孙常玉,宫必宁.基于ADINA接触算法的岩质边坡稳定分析.水利与建筑工程学报2006,4(4):26~27,63
[13]朱大勇,李悼芬等.对3种著名边坡稳定性计算方法的改进.岩石力学与工程学报2005,24(2):183~194
[14]崔政权,李宁.《边坡工程:理论与实践最新发展》.中国水利水电出版社.1999.12
[15]黄润秋,赵松江等.四川省宣汉县天台乡滑坡形成过程和机理分析.2005(l):13-15
[16]杨文东,谢全敏等.三峡库区童家坪滑坡机理与稳定性评价[J〕.土工基础.2006.2(20):21-23
[17]杨为民,吴树仁等.湖北秘归千将坪岩质滑坡形成机理研究〔J〕.煤炭工程.2006(4):57-59
[18]陈祖煌.《土质边坡稳定分析一原理方法程序》.中国水利水电出版社.2003
[19]许建聪,尚岳全.碎石土古滑坡稳定性分析.岩石力学与工程学报.2007,26(1):57~65
[20]徐卫亚.边坡及滑坡环境岩石力学与工程研究[M],中国环境科学出版社.2006
[21]翁其能,唐梅红,陈洪凯等.滑坡治理过程中岩土体变形场的演绎趋势分析.重庆交通学院学报.2001,20(1):69~73
[22]《工程地质手册编委会》.工程地质手册(第四版) [M],北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
[23]徐邦栋.《滑坡分析与防治》.中国铁道出版社.2001
[24]傣锦福,尹光志等.向家山滑坡成因分析及其综合治理研究.土工基础.2006,20(4):12~15
[25] Kelly AJ,et al Deformation of the deeP ereek bridge by an aetive landslide in clay shale[J」.Canadian Geoteehnieal Journal,1995,32(4):701-724
[26]戴自航,彭振斌.地基系数法在岩体抗滑桩内力计算中的作用.湖南大学学报.2002,29(1):98~104
[27]国家防汛抗早总指挥部办公室.中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所《山洪泥石流滑坡灾害及防治》.科学出版社.1994.8
[28]郭飞.天台山烂槽子滑坡稳定性分析.四川大学硕士学位论文.2006.4
[29]朱永莉.四川美姑县城南滑坡及防治方案研究.西南交通大学硕士学位沦为.2008.3
[30]李传宝.云南新平芭蕉树滑坡工程地质特征及成因机理研究.西南交通大学研究生学位论文.2007.4
[31]张雪东.呷爬滑坡稳定性评价与防治方案设计.吉林大学硕士学位论文[D].2004.5
[32]李广信.《高等土力学》.清华大学出版社.2004.7
[33].阎超君.土质边坡滑坡机理及防治措施的研究[D].合肥工业大学硕士学位论文.2005.5
[34]邢绍坤.达州市某生活办公区滑坡稳定性分析与工程治理措施[D].重庆大学工程硕士学位论文.2006.11
[35]连镇营,韩国城,孔宪京.强度折减有限元研究开挖边坡的稳定性.岩土工程报.2001,23(4):406~411
[36]许建聪,尚岳全等.强降雨作用下的浅层滑坡稳定性分析.岩石力学与工程学报2005,24(18):3246~3251
[37]周翠英,刘柞秋.边坡变形破坏过程的大变形有限元分析.岩土力学.2003,24(4):644~652
[38]高雄鹰.南约沟隧道出口堆积层滑坡稳定性分析及防治.西南交通大学研究生硕士学位论文[D].2005.5
[39]王鸿.达州市青宁乡岩门村滑坡成因机制分析与治理工程措施研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文.2008.6
[40]寇晓东,周维恒,杨若琼等.FLAC30进行三峡船闸高边坡稳定分析.岩石力学与工程学报.200120(l):6~10
[41] Itasca consuliting group.Inc.FLAC3D(Fast lagrangian Analysis of continual in 3 dimensions).Itasca consuliting group.Inc.,1977
[42]殷坤龙等.国际滑坡研究的新进展.水文地质工程地质,2000(5)
[43] YAO Lingkan,FANG Duo. On the Self-organized criticality of non-uniform sands[J]. International Jouinal of Sediment Research,1998,13(3): 19-24
[44] Frette V, Malthe-Srbressen K C A. Jrssang J F T et al. Avalanche dynamics in a pile of rice[J].Nature, 1996,379(27):49-52.
[45] Bretz M,Cunningham J B,Kurczvnslci P L,etal. Imaging of avalanches in GranularMaterials[J].Physical Review Letters.1992,69(I}:2431~2434.
[46] Afshin Montaktiab and J. M.Cacison:Avalanches, transport, and local equilibrium in self-organized criticality[J].Physical Review E.1998,58(5):5608-5619.
[47]魏继红,吴继敏,孙少锐.FLAC3D在边坡稳定性分析中的应用.勘察科学技术.2005(2):27~30
[48]郑颖人,赵尚毅.有限元强度折减法在土坡与岩坡中的应用.岩石力学与工程学报2004,23(19):3381~3388
[49]艾志雄,罗先启,刘波等.FLAC3D基本原理及其在边坡稳定性分析中的应用.灾害与防治工程.2006,60(l):19~24
[50]方玉树,黄家愉.边坡稳定性若干问题.重庆建筑.2007,39(1):40~43
[51]谢立辉,欧名贤.工程边坡的稳定性分析及抗滑桩的应用研究.长沙大学学报.2003, 17(4):70~73
[52]沈君明.四川华鉴山溪口镇马鞍坪斜坡稳定性评价及加固处理措施研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2007
[53]赵明阶,何光春等.边坡工程处治技术北京:人民交通出版社,2004.
[54]堪壮丽,李妥德.钻性滑带土剪切过程中结构变化与抗剪强度的关系[J].水文地质工程质论丛.北京:地质出版社,1986
[55]王思敬,王效宁.大型高速滑坡的能量分析及其灾害预测.1987年全国滑坡学术讨论会论文选集.成都:四川科学技术出版社1989
[56]刘玉国.三峡库区云阳县杨家坝滑坡稳定性评价[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[57]秦凯旭.白鹤滩水电站坝址下游恩子坪2#滑坡成因机制分析及稳定性评价[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[58]袁丁.南阳骗滑坡稳定性分析及治理工程措施研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[59]黄润秋,赵松江,宋肖冰,等.四川省宣汉县天台乡滑坡形成过程和机理分析[J].水文地质工程,2005,32(l)
[60]乔建平.滑坡减灾理论与实践.北京:北京科学技术出版社,1997.8
[61]葛华.重庆市万州草街子双堰塘滑坡稳定性评价及治理工程优化设计[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文2003
[62]赵明阶,何光春等.边坡工程处治技术北京:人民交通出版社,2004
[53]王兰生,张淖元.斜坡岩体变形的动力学机制[A].水文地质工程地质论丛[C].北京:地质出版社,1986