不同调控措施对烟草香味基础物质及相关性状的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
为探索烟草品种间香味物质差异的原因以及最佳的调控措施,本文以高香气烤烟新品系8306、H892,栽培品种K326、中烟100为材料,采用不同氮用量和水杨酸处理两种调控措施,研究对致香物质含量及其组成等方面的影响,初步结论如下:
     1、烟草叶片的叶绿素和类胡萝卜素含量随叶龄增加上升,在20d或30d时达到最高值,而后逐步下降、各基因型表现一致。基因型间叶绿素含量、类胡萝卜素含量存在显著差异。相同叶龄的叶绿素含量H892、8306显著高于K326、中烟100。不同品种相同叶龄中的类胡萝卜素含量以H892最高,中烟100最低。氮用量间叶绿素、类胡萝卜素含量存在显著差异。氮用量的增加有利于提高叶绿素含量,四个基因型在各个叶龄的叶绿素含量表现为高氮>中氮>低氮,差异达到显著。氮素处理间类胡萝卜素含量差异显著,中氮最高,高氮次之,低氮最低,适宜的氮用量能提高类胡萝卜素的含量。
     外源SA(水杨酸)处理烟草的最佳浓度为1.5mmol·L~(-1)。喷施后及对照的叶绿素、类胡萝卜素含量变化随时间呈现先上升然后下降的单峰曲线,但变化趋势不同。喷施SA在3d-6d之间叶绿素、类胡萝卜素含量开始高于对照,喷施后第6d达到最高。到15d时,叶绿素含量是对照含量的1.13倍,类胡萝卜素含量是对照含量的1.10倍,均显著高于对照。
     2、腺毛密度随着叶龄的增加均表现为下降趋势,20d最高,60d最低。基因型之间表现差异显著,各叶龄均为8306的腺毛密度高于K326。氮素处理对腺毛密度的影响显著,腺毛密度表现为中氮处理>高氮处理>低氮处理,
     3、叶面分泌物含量随叶龄的增加各基因型总体呈现单峰曲线,20d-40d含量逐渐增加,40d达到顶峰后逐渐下降,50d-60d的含量下降缓慢。40d时基因型间含量差异显著,8306>H892>中烟100>K326。60d时基因型间含量差异显著,8306>H892> K326 >中烟100。8306的含量在各个叶龄期均高于其他三个基因型。中烟100的含量除了50d叶龄外,其他各个叶龄均最低。随着叶龄的增加,三个氮用量处理的叶面分泌物含量呈现单峰曲线,20d-40d增加,40d时达顶峰后下降,60d时降到最低。氮用量处理间叶面分泌物含量差异显著。中氮处理含量在各个叶龄期均高于低氮处理和高氮处理。低氮处理和高氮处理叶面分泌物含量在大部分叶龄差异不显著。
     喷施SA后,叶面分泌物含量三个基因型(8306、H892、中烟100)呈现相同单峰曲线,0d-6d含量上升,6d达到峰值,6d-15d含量下降。0d-3d喷施处理的叶面分泌物含量低于对照,第3d时各基因型喷施SA的叶面分泌物含量显著低于对照。第3d-6d,喷施处理的含量逐渐高于对照,第6d时,喷施SA处理的含量显著高于对照。但是到15d时,除8306外其他两个品种喷施处理的含量没有显著高于对照。
     4、8306基因型烟叶中性香气基础物质总量、苯丙氨酸类降解产物、茄酮、类胡萝卜素降解产物、美拉德反应产物、叶绿素降解产物等香气物质含量均高于K326,尤其是茄酮含量,比K326高41.16%。随氮用量的增加,8306的中性香气基础物质总含量增加,而K326的中性香气基础物质的总含量呈现下降趋势。
     5、不同氮用量间的石油醚提取物含量差异显著,高氮处理的含量显著高于低氮处理的含量;基因型间石油醚提取物含量差异也达到显著水平, 8306>H892>K326>中烟100。8306的含量极显著高于其他三个基因型,中烟100的含量显著低于其他三个基因型。各基因型喷施SA后比对照含量稍高,但差异不显著。
     6、总氮含量变化总体呈现单峰曲线变化,10d-30d含量增加,30d时达到最大值,30d-40d急剧下降,40d后缓慢下降, 60d时下降到最小值。随氮用量增加,烟叶中总氮含量上升,高氮处理的烟叶总氮含量显著高于低氮处理的含量。
     基因型间的总氮含量差异显著, 8306含量10d-30d上升期是四个基因型中幅度最小的, 30d高峰时总氮含量处于中等水平,30d后下降幅度最小,60d总氮含量显著高于其他三个基因型。H892的变化和8306相反。60d的总氮含量和叶片衰老期氮消耗关系较大。基因型不同氮素的代谢积累消耗特点不同,要根据氮素利用特点制定氮素调控措施。
Our research aimed to explore the reasons of the impact of tobacco flavor material produced for the differences among varieties and the best control measures ,we have studied the new variety of the flue-cured 8306 and H892, and conventional cultivars K326 and ZY 100. the impact was resear -ched on the content of aroma and composition by two control measures of nitrogen levels and the outer of the salicylaldehyde acid treatment, the preliminary conclusions are as follows:
     1 Chlorophyll and carotenoid content in the tobacco leaf increased with growing flue-cured tobacco leaf, it reached the highest value at 20d or 30d , then gradually decreased, all genotypes showed the same tendency. chlorophyll content and carotenoid content were significantly different among the genotypes. On the same leaf age Chlorophyll content of H892 and 8306 were significantly higher than K326 and ZY100 ,carotenoid content of H892 was significantly higher than the other three genotypes, carotenoid content of 100 lower than the other three genotypes. Among nitrogen levels content of chlorophyll and carotenoid content were significantly different. Increase of the amount of nitrogen will help improve the chlorophyll content, the chlorophyll content of the four genotypes in various ages showed: high nitrogen treatment > ordinary nitrogen treatment > low nitrogen treatment, differences were significant. Carotenoid content of nitrogen treatments was significantly different, ordinary nitrogen treatments > the highest nitrogen treatment > low nitrogen treatment, the appropriate amount of nitrogen can improve the content of carotenoids.
     The difference of the chlorophyll and carotenoid content among nitrogen treatments and genotypes showed that the control to the right of chlorophyll and carotenoid content is feasible by change of genotypes or nitrogen regulation.
     The results show that:On the tobacco leaf the best concentration of salicylic acid treatment was 1.5mmol·L~(-1). The change of spraying salicylic acid treatment and CK of chlorophyll content and carotenoid content was a single peak curve, but different variation between spraying salicylic acid treatment and CK . At the 3d-6d chlorophyll and carotenoid content of spraying SA treatment has been higher than CK, after spraying 6d chlorophyll and carotenoid content reached the top.At 15d, the chlorophyll content was 1.13 times than CK, carotenoid content was 1.10 times than CK.
     2 Glandular hairs density showed a downward trend with growing flue-cured tobacco leaf, it reached the highest at 20d, and lowest at 60d. A significant difference among genotypes, glandular hairs of 8306 are denser than K326’s. Nitrogen treatment on the glandular density was significantly difference, glandular hairs showed the density of ordinary nitrogen treatment> high nitrogen> low nitrogen treatment.
     3 The change of overall genotypes tobacco leaf surface trichome exudate showed single peak with growing flue-cured tobacco leaf, increased in 20d-40d, peaked at 40d and then decreased, decreased slowly in 50d-60d. At 40d content were significant differences among genotypes, 8306> H892> ZY100> K326. At 60d contents were significant differences among genotypes, 8306> H892> K326>ZY100. The content of 8306 was highest than the other three genotypes at every leaf stage. In addition to 50d leaf age , the content of ZY100 was lowest at other various ages. with growing flue-cured tobacco leaf, the three nitrogen treatment content showed a single peak discharge curve, 20d-40d increased, 40d then decreased and reached its peak, 60d reached the minimum. Among nitrogen treatments leaf surface trichome exudate content were significantly difference. Nitrogen treatment of content in each leaf stage were higher than the other two nitrogen treatmentce. Low-nitrogen treatment and high nitrogen content was not significant difference in most of the leaf age leaf secretion.
     After spraying SA, the overall content of leaf surface trichome exudate of three genotypes(8306、H892、中烟100) of secretion showed the same single peak, 0d-6d content increased, 6d peaked, 6d-15d decreased. 0d-3d spraying treatment were lower than CK, at 3d spraying treatment was significantly lower than CK,at 3d-6d, spraying treatment levels were higher than CK, at 6d, the spraying treatment was significantly higher than CK. But at 15d, in addition to 8306, the other two species of spraying treatment were not significant higher CK.
     4 In 8306 tobacco leaf total neutral aroma substances, degradation products of phenylalanine class, solanone, carotenoid degradation products, Maillard reaction products, neophytadiene were higher than K326, particularly solanone content was 41.16% higher than the K326. With the increase of the nitrogen level, 8306’s total neutra material aromatic content increased, while the K326 was contrary to 8306.
     5 Significant analysis of petroleum ether extracts of the changes showde that the same genotype of petroleum ether extract was significantly difference among different nitrogen content, high N treatment was significantly higher than the low N treatment; petroleum ether extract content were significant differences among genotypes ,in the level of the whole, from high N treatment to low N treatment for the 8306> H892> K326> ZY100. 8306’s content was significantly higher than the other three genotypes, ZY100 was significantly lower than the other three genotypes.
     All genotype’s spraying treatment content slightly higher than CK, but the difference was not significant. Petroleum ether extract was significantly different levels among genotypes, from high N treatment to low N treatment for the 8306> H892>ZY100.
     6 Total nitrogen content in general showed a single peak curve, 10d-30d increased, 30d reached the maximum, 30d-40d decreased sharply, after 40d the slow decline, 60d decreased to minimum. With the increased of nitrogen, total nitrogen content of leaves was increased, total nitrogen of high nitrogen treatment was significantly higher than the low nitrogen treatment.
     Total nitrogen content of different genotype was significantly differences, 10d-30d increased rate of the 8306 is the smallest in the four genotypes, 30d peak at a medium level of total nitrogen content, after 30d it was the smallest declined rate, at 60d total nitrogen content was significantly higher than the other three genotypes. H892 and 8306 changes in the opposite. At 60d the total nitrogen content and nitrogen consumption senescence had a greater correlation. The different genotypes had differect nitrogen metabolism and consumed characteristics, control measures was Formulated according to the characteristics of nitrogen utilization.
引文
[1] RALloyd, Miller CW,Robert DL,etal.Flue-cured tobacco flavoer I.Essence and essential oil components[J].Tob Sci,1976,54:40-48.
    [2]冼可法,沈朝智,戚万敏.云南烤烟中性香味物质分析研究[J].中国烟草学报,1992,(2):1-9.
    [3] Stedman RL.The chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke [J]. Chem Rev, 1968, 68:153-207.
    [4]刘百战,冼可法.不同部位、成熟度及颜色的云南烤烟中某些中性香味成分的分析研究[J].中国烟草学报,1993,(3):46-53.
    [5]李炎强,胡有持,冼可法,等.烤烟叶片与烟梗挥发性、半挥发性酸性成分研究[J].中国烟草学报,2001,7(3):1-5.
    [6]杨再波,彭黔荣,赖东辉,等.烤烟烟梗中挥发性中性香味成分的分析研究[J].贵州工业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,(2):31-39.
    [7]谢卫,刘江生,杨斌,等.不同部位烤烟中香味成分的分析研究[J].福建分析测试,2003,12(2):1740-1742.
    [8]金闻博,戴亚,横田拓,等.烟草化学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2000:45-46.
    [9]史宏志,韩锦峰,官春云.烟叶香气前体物在成熟和调制过程中的变化[ J ].作物研究,1996,10(2):22-25.
    [10]王瑞新.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:84-85.
    [11]杨虹琦,周冀衡,罗泽民,等.不同产区烤烟中质体色素嚣降解产物的研究[J].西南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2004.26 (5):640-644
    [12]姚益群,谢金轮,郭其菲,等.云南烟草香气研究[J].烟草科技,1998(4):24-27
    [13]李雪震,张希杰,李念胜,等.烤烟烟叶色素与烟叶品质的关系[J].中国烟草,1988(2):23-27 [14 ]左天觉.朱尊权,译.烟草的生产、生理和生物化学[M].上海:上海远东出版社,1993 :386-396.
    [15] WEYBREWJ A. Estimation of the plastid pigments in tobacco[J]. Tobacco Science ,1957(1) :1 - 5.
    [16]杨虹琦,周冀衡,罗泽民.烟叶质体色素代谢与香味物质形成关系的研究[C].中国烟叶学术论文集.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2004 :471- 475.
    [17]周冀衡,杨虹琦,林桂华,等.不同烤烟产区烟叶中主要挥发性香气物质的研究[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2004 ,30(1) :20 -23.
    [18] WEEKSWW. Chemistry of tobacco constituents influents flavor and aroma[J].Rec Adv Tob Sci ,1985 ,11 :175 - 200.
    [19]杨虹琦,周冀衡,杨述元,等.不同产区烤烟中主要潜香型物质对评吸质量的影响研究[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2005 ,31(1) :11- 14.
    [20]于建军,庞天河,任晓红,等.烤烟中性致香物质与评吸结果关系研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2006 ,40(4) :346 - 349.
    [21]上海烟草集团技术中心.国内外烤烟化学成分的初步分析.2007年青岛全国特色烟叶会议
    [22] Davis D L,Nielse n M T.烟草生产、化学和技术[ M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003
    [23]周冀衡,朱小平,王彦亭,等.烟草生理与生物化学[M].合肥:中国科学技术出版社,1996:463-465.
    [24]史宏志,刘国顺.烟草香味学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998:49.
    [25]李雪震,张希杰,李念胜,等.烤烟烟叶色素与烟叶品质的关系[J].中国烟草,1988,(2):23-27.
    [26] Roberts DL. Natural tobacco flavor. Rec . Adv. of Tob .Sci. ,1988,14:49-81
    [27]景延秋,宫长荣,张月华,等.烟草香味物质分析研究进展[J].中国烟草科学,2005,(2):44-48.
    [28] Wahlberg I, Karlson K, Austin DJ,etal, Effects of flue-curing and aging on the volatile neutral and acidic constituents of Virginia tobacco. Phytochem.,1997,16,1217-31.
    [29]赵铭钦,汪耀富,杜士彬,等.陈化期间烟叶香气成分消长规律的研究.中国农业大学学报.1997, 2 (3): 73-77
    [30] Keene C K, Wagner G J. Direct demonstration of duvatrienediol biosynthesis in glandular heads of tobacco trichomes .Plant Physiol,1985,79: 1026-1032
    [31] Wahlberg I, Karlson K, Austin DJ,etal, Effects of flue-curing and aging on the volatile neutral and acidicconstituents of Virginia tobacco. Phytochem.,1997,16,1217-31.
    [32]左天觉,朱尊权(译).烟草的生产、生理和生物化学[M].上海:上海远东出版社,1993.
    [33]周冀衡,朱小平,王彦亭,等烟草生理与生物化学[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,1996:475-478.
    [34]Severson R F,Arrendale R F, Chortyk O T, et al Quantitation of the maior cuticular components from green leaf of different tobacco type.J.Agric.Food Chem.,1985,32:566-570
    [35]杨铁钊.烟草育种学.北京:中国农业出版社.2003.207
    [36]王瑞新,马常力,韩锦峰,等.考验不同品种香气物质的定量分析.河南农业大学学报.1991,(2):152-157.
    [37]许自成,刘桂珍,马京民,等.烤烟叶片石油醚提取物含量的遗传变异及稳定性分析,郑州轻工业学院学报,2004,19(3):25-29.
    [38] Greenhagen B, Chappell J. PNAS, 2001, 98: 13479~13481.
    [39]陈大华,叶和春,等.植物类异戊二烯代谢途径的分子生物学研究进展[J] .植物学报, 2000, 42: 551- 558.
    [40] Chappell J, Nable R. Induction of sesquiterpenoid biosythesis in tobacco cell suspension cuttures by fungal elicite [J]. Plant Physical,1987,85:469- 473.
    [41] Chappell J. The biochemistry and molecular biology of isoprenoid metabolism[J]. Plant physical,1995,107:1- 6.
    [42] Sigrid G, Stephanie BM, et al. Isolation of the dxrgene of Zymomonas mobilis and characterization of the 1 - deoxy- D- xylulose 5– phosphate reducetoisomerse [J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2000,191:131- 137.
    [43] Littgen H, Rodich F, et al. Biosynthesis of terpenoids: Y ch B protein of Echerichia coli phosphoryates the 2- hydroxy group of 4-diphosphocytidy 1- 2C- methyl- D- erythritol [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2000,97:12062- 12067.
    [44] Zamir L. O., Nedea M. E., Belair S., Sauriol F., Mamer O., jacqmain E., Jean F. I., Garneau F. X. Biosynthetic building blocks of Taxus canadiensis taxanes.Tetrahedron Letters. 1992, 33, 5235-5236.
    [45] Eisenreich W., Menhard B., Hylands P. J., Zenk M. H., Bacher A. Studies on the biosynthesis of taxol: The taxane carbon skeleton is not of mevalonoid origin. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of American. 1996, 93, 6431-6436.
    [46] Palazón J., CusidóR. M., Bonfill M., Morales C., Pi?ol M. T. Inhibition of paclitaxel and baccatin III accumulation by mevinolin and fosmidomycin in suspension cultures of Taxus baccata. Journal of Biotechnology. 2003, 101, 157-163.
    [47] Wang Y. D., Yuan Y. J., Wu J. C. Translocation of isopentenyl pyrophosphate for Taxol biosynthesis in suspension cultures of Taxus chinensis var. mairei. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2003, 74, 283-288.
    [48]常爱霞,贾兴华,郝廷亮,等.特香型烤烟挥发性致香物质的测定与分析[J].中国烟草科学,2001,(1):1-5.
    [49]冼可法.烟草香味物质研究.烟草科技情报资料,1998,(6):13-21
    [50]韩锦峰,刘卫群,杨素琴,等。海拔高度对烤烟香气物质的影响,中国烟草,1993,(3)1-3
    [51] Gamou K. Studies on kaf Surface lipid of tobacco. Agric Biol Chem, 1980, 44 (9):2119-2124
    [52]张艳玲,尹启生,蔡宪杰,等.不同年份烤烟主要化学成分及中、微量元素比较[M].烟草科技,2007,12:42-45
    [53]韩锦峰,马常力等.烤烟香气物质及施肥种类施肥量对香气物质的影响.作物学报. 1993(2):15-20
    [54]史宏志,韩锦峰等.不同氮素营养的烟叶氨基酸含量与香吃味品质的关系.河南农业大学学报.1997(4):319-322
    [55]韩锦峰,王凌等.生物有机肥对烤烟生长发育及其产量和品质的影响.河南农业科学,1999(6):6-9
    [56] Court W A. Hendel J G. & Pocs, R. Influence of transplanting and harvesting date on the agronomic and chemical characteristics of flue-cured-tobacco. Tob. Sci 1993,37,59-64.
    [57] Williams P S. Hydrolytic flavor release in fruit and wines through hydrolysis of nonvolatile precursors.In:Flavor Science: Sensible Principals and Techniques.Am.Chem.Soc,1993, Washington DC.
    [58] Weeks W W, etal. Differences in aroma, chemistry, solubility, and smoking quality of cured flue-cured tobaccos with a glandular and glandular trichomes. J. Agric.Food Chem. 1992,40:1911-1917
    [59] Wahlberg JA, Hamann HK. Growth measurements under field conditions. In:Recent Advances in the Chemical Composition of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp.,New Orleans. 1997, 164-83
    [60]宫长荣,汪耀富,赵铭钦,等.烘烤过程中烟叶香气成分变化的研究[J ].烟草科技,1995(5) :31 - 33 ,27.
    [61] WRIGHT H E. Cartotenoids and related colorless polyenes of aged burley tobacco I The nondialyzable fraction[J ]. Arch Bioehem Biophys ,1960 ,86 :94 -101. [62于建军,李琳,任晓红,等.晒红烟陈化过程中中性致香物质含量的变化[J].郑州轻工业学院学报:自然科学版,2006 ,21(2) :108 - 112.
    [63]朱大恒,韩锦锋,张爱萍,等.自然醇化和人工发酵对烤烟化学成分变化的影响比较研究[J].烟草科技,1999(1) :3 - 5.
    [64]余永茂,高芳磬,张淑华,等.微生物酶发酵低次烟叶初试报告[J].烟草科技,1988(5):16-18
    [65]郭俊成,程晓蕾,肖厚荣,等.皖南烤烟陈化研究[J].中国烟草,1996(2):16-17
    [66]韩锦峰.烟草栽培生理[ M] .北京:中国农业出版社, 2003. 208- 222.
    [67]丁秀英,张军,苏宝林,等.水杨酸在植物抗病中的作用[J].植物学通报,2001,18(2):163-168.
    [68]原永兵,曹宗.水杨酸在植物体内的作用[J].植物学通讯,1994,11.
    [69] Mtraux J P,Singer H,Ryals J A,et al.Increase in salicylic acid at the onset of systemic acquried res istance in cucumber[J].Science,1990,250:1004-1006.
    [70]蔡新忠,郑重,宋凤鸣.水杨酸对水稻幼苗抗瘟性的诱导作用[J].植物病理学报,1996,26(1):7-12.
    [71]赵淑清,郭剑波.植物系统获得抗性及其信号转导途径[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(7):781-787.
    [72] Despres C,DeLong C,Glaze S,et al.The arabidopsis NPR1/MIM1 protein interacts with a subgroup of the TGA family of bZIP transcription factors[J].Plant Cell,2000,12:279-290.
    [73] Zhou J M,Trifa Y,Silva H,et al.NPR1 differentially interacts with members of the TGA/OBF family of transcription factors that bind an element of the PR-1 gene required for induction by salicylic acid [J]. MPMI,2000,13:191-202.
    [74] Schalk M,Cabellohurtado F,Pierrel M A,et al.Piperonylic acid,a selective,mech- anism-based inactivator of t rans-cinnamate 4-hydroxylase:A new tool to control the flux of metabolites in the phenylpropanoid pathway[J].Plant Physiol,1998,118:209-218.
    [75] Du H,Klessig D F.Identification of a soluble,high affinity salicylic acid- binding protein in tobacco[J].Plant Physiol,1997,113:1319-1327.
    [76]廖祥儒,陈敬,周艳芬,等.水杨酸对小麦愈伤组织CAT和POD同工酶的影响[J]麦类作物学报2000,20(2):66-68.
    [77]李淑菊,马德华,庞金安.水杨酸对黄瓜几种酶活性及抗病性的诱导作用[J].华北农学报, 2000,15(2) :118~122
    [78]师金鸽,李占杰,杨铁钊.水杨酸对烟草抗黄瓜花叶病毒的诱导效应[J].华北农学报,2008,23(6):108-111
    [79] Zhang S Q,Klessig D F.Salicylicacidactivatesa48kD MAP kinaseintobacco[J].Plant Cell,1997,9:809-824.
    [80]何水林,林文雄,陈如凯,等.外源水杨酸对辣椒倍半萜环化酶基因表达及抗氧化酶系的作用[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(5):569-572
    [81]苗志奇,未作君,元英进.水杨酸在紫杉醇生物合成中诱导作用的研究[J].生物工程学报,2000,16(4):509-513
    [82]师素云,练兴明,等.增香灵( ZXL)对薄荷生长及出油率的影响.[ J] .江苏农业科学, 1999,( 3) : 38- 39.
    [83] Ferrer A., Balcells L., Hegardt F. G., Boronat A. Isolation and structural characterization of a cDNA encoding Arabidopsis thaliana 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. Plant Molecular Biology.1989, 13: 627-638.
    [84] Maldonado-Mendoza I. E., Vincent R. M., Nessler C. L. Molecular characterization of three differentially expressed members of the Camptotheca acuminata 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase (HMGR) gene family. Plant Molecular Biology. 1997, 34, 781-790.
    [85] Maldenado-Mendoza I. E., Burnett R. J., Nessler C. L. Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase from Catharanthus roseus. Plant Physiology. 1992, 100: 1613-1614.
    [86] Kato-Emori S., Higashi K., Hosoya K., Kobayashi T., Ezura H. Cloning and characterization of the gene encoding 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase in melon (Cucumis melo L. reticulatus). Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2001, 265, 135-142.
    [87] Park H., Denbow C. J., Cramer C. L. Structure and nucleotide sequence of tomato HMG2 encoding 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase. Plant Molecular Biology. 1992, 20: 327-331.
    [88] Learned R. M., Fink G. R. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase from Arabidopsis thaliana is structurally distinct from the yeast and animal enzymes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of American. 1989, 86, 2779-2783.
    [89] Bach T. J. Some new aspects of isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants-a review.Lipids. 1995, 30: 191-202
    [90]刘智,余龙江.植物生理与分子生理学学报.2005,31(2):199-204
    [91] Chappell J. The biochemistry and molecular biology of isoprenoid metabolism[J].PlantPhysiol,1995,107:1-6
    [92] Oba K,Kondo K,Doke M,Uritani I.Induction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglursryl CoA reductase in potato tubers after slicing ,fungal infection or chemical treatment ,and some properties of the enzyme [J].Plant Cell Physiol, 1985,26:873-880
    [93] Chappell J. Biochemistry and molecular biology of the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway in plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1995,46:521~547
    [94] chtenthaler HK, Rohmer M, Schwender J. Two independent biochemical pathways for isopentenyl diphosphate and isoprenoid biosynthesis in higher plants. Physiol Plant, 1997,101:643~652
    [95] ita JO, Gruissem W. Tomato hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase is required early in fruit development but not during ripening. Plant Cell, 1989,1:181~190
    [96]李雪君,崔红,刘海礁,等. fps转基因烤烟类胡萝卜素及其降解产物的研究.中国烟草学, 2006( 03):25-27.
    [97]王瑞新.烟草化学品质分析法[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1990
    [98] Severson R F, Johnson A W,Jackson A W.烟草表面成分是影响其产量,抗虫病能力及烟气质量的因素.第三十九届烟草化学家研究讨论会论文选,烟草科技情报资料,1987(1):63-108.
    [99]Kaneto H. Tobacco leaf components and tobacco flavoring[J].Tob.Res.1980, 128:309-316.
    [100]Enzell C R and Wahlberg, I. Leaf composition in relation to smoking quality and aroma[J]. Rec. Adv. Tob. Sci. 1980,6:64-122.
    [101]Roeraade J and EnseII CR. Tobacco chemistry sampling. concentration and examination. of tobacco headspace vapors. Tob Sci.1972,31:281-288
    [102]王霞,翟争光,杨铁钊,等.烤烟基因型间香味物质的差异分析[J].中国烟草科学,2007,28(6):6-8.
    [103]时向东,刘国顺,韩锦峰等.不同类型肥料对烤烟叶片腺毛密度、种类及分布规律的影响[J].中国烟草学报,1999,2:19-22
    [104]韩锦峰,王广山,远彤,等.烤烟叶面分泌物的初步研究[J].中国烟草,1995,16(2):10-13
    [105]杨铁钊,李伟,李钦奎,等。烤烟叶面腺毛密度及其分泌物变化动态的相关分析[A].中国烟草科学,2005,(1):43-46
    [106]赵世杰,刘华山,董新纯.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998.68-72.
    [107] SHIGENAGA M K,HAGEN T M, AMES B N.Oxidative damage and mitochondrial decay in aging[J ]. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA , 1994 ,91 :10771- 10778
    [108]周冀衡,王勇,邵岩,等.产烟国部分烟区烤烟质体色素及主要挥发性香气物质含量的比较[J].湖南农业大学学报,2005(2):128-132.
    [109]云菲,刘国顺,史宏志,等.光氮互作对烤烟光合作用及叶绿素荧光特性的影响.中国农业科2010,43(5):932-941
    [110]张秋芳,刘奕平,刘波,等.烟草主要酚类物质研究进展.福建农业学报2006,21(2),158-163

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700