高速公路软基处理方案智能评价与优化方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着我国高速公路的大规模建设,工程中遇到的软土问题越来越突出,已成为影响工程质量、建设工期和工程造价的关键性因素之一。因此,加强高速公路软基处理技术的研究,已成为影响我国交通事业发展的一个重要课题。
     在高速公路软基处理的技术研究中,存在着大量的决策问题。在设计阶段,首先需要对是否进行处理做出决策,对需要处理的地段,则须对采取深层处理还是浅层处理做出决策;对于浅层处理或深层处理的具体方法也需要做出决策;对于某种具体的处理方法,需要对其技术参数做出决策。本文以系统工程、人工智能、模糊数学、灰色理论、神经网络、遗传算法和粒子群优化算法等为理论基础,结合岩土工程、土质学和土力学等学科的最新发展,对高速公路软基处理方案智能评价与优化方法进行了研究。
     按照研究的内容和论文的章节顺序,所取得的具体成果有:
     (1)简要地介绍了本课题研究的目的和意义,介绍了有关软基处理技术的国内外研究现状,系统地阐述了现有的软基处理方案评价方法,如评分优化法、模糊评判法、层次分析法以及地基处理智能辅助设计系统等,指出了它们存在的主要问题和不足,在此基础上,提出了本研究的工作思路和主要内容。
     (2)针对软基处理技术决策中是否需要进行处理,是深层处理还是浅层处理的问题,通过研究有关土工参数的相关性等,提出以软土厚度、软土压缩模量、路堤填土高度、地表硬壳层厚度作为决策参数,以人工智能中的范例推理为基础,并考虑到在不同的决策环境下相同的属性对决策输出会有不同的影响,提出了基于变权的高速公路软基处理方案范例推理评价方法。实例分析表明,该模型具有原理简单、直观,使用方便等特点;利用神经网络工具箱建立了BP神经网络评价模型,对所建的神经网络模型进行训练、回判和预测,得到了满意的结果,证明模型是有效的。
     (3)提出了基于AHP的模糊相似优先比的高速公路软基处理评价模型。在该模型中,定义了模糊相似比,构造了软基处理方案影响因素的模糊相似优先关系,利用层次分析法确定了各影响因素的权重,从整体上找出了与理想方案最为相似的软基处理方案。
     (4)鉴于软基处理方案评价中各指标的不相容性问题,以模糊物元分析理论为基础,为避免在权重分配问题上的主观性,用信息熵所反映数据本身的效用值计算指标的权重,将信息熵理论与模糊物元分析相结合,建立了基于信息熵的模糊物元分析决策模型。将该模型应用于高速公路软基处理方案的评价中,得到了合理的处理方案,为选择合理的软基处理方案提供了一条新的可行途径。
     (5)软基处理方案决策影响因素具有不完全性、未知性等特点,软基处理方案决策实质上是灰色系统问题。本文运用灰色系统理论,建立了一种新的软基处理方案评价方法,合理确定了方案评价指标及其权重,根据计算得出的灰色关联度来实现对软基处理方案的优选。实例分析表明,该模型使用方便、决策结果合理,具有实用价值。
     (6)将自适应共振理论用于高速公路软基处理的方案决策,建立了基于ART网络的高速公路软基处理方案评价方法。实例表明,模型具有易于实王见、效率高等特点。
     (7)论述了粉体搅拌桩的传统设计理论和方法,应用遗传算法、粒子群优化算法和非线性优化方法,建立了粉喷桩的三种优化设计模型,开发了粉喷桩设计与优化系统,最后运用工程实例验证了优化模型的可行性和有效性。
With the large-scale construction of expressway, the problem of soft ground is becoming more and more protrusive and has been one of key factors influencing project quality, project cycle and project cost. So it has become a very important task to strengthen the research on the improvement of expressway soft ground, which affects the development of traffic project in China.
     There are much decision problems in the study of expressway soft ground improvement. During the design phase, decision whether to improve the ground or not should be made firstly, then it should make clearly whether deep improvement or shallow improvement in the segment which needs improvement. And the detailed method on improvement should be made distinctly too. Finally, the technical parameters of the method should be decided. Based on system engineering, artificial intelligence, comprehensive evaluation, neural network, fuzzy mathematics, genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization, etc. and combing the latest developments of geo-technique and soil mechanics, the dissertation studies many aspects of problems to establish intelligent decision support system of expressway ground improvement.
     According to the research contents and sequences of chapters and sections, the main achievement of the dissertation are concisely mentioned as follows:
     1. It expresses briefly the purpose and significance of the article, and introduces comprehensively present research situation, existing problems and research prospect of ground improvement. Based on systems analysis of decision problems of expressway ground improvement, it puts forward research subject and chief contents of intelligent decision model of soft soil improvement methods.
     2. In view of the incompleteness and uncertainty of these effective factors, a new intelligent decision model of the soft ground improvement method of the highway using case-based reasoning is presented for the first time. Considering the sensitivity of attribute weights to the environment, the algorithm of attribute weights is set up on the basis of the concept of changeable weights. It is shown from example that results of the decision model is simple, visual, practical and convenient to use.
     3. In this dissertation, the decision model of the soft soil improvement methods based on fuzzy analogy preferred ratio is put forward. In this model, fuzzy analogy preferred relationship between feasible methods and the ideal one is determined, and the similar series in them in every affecting factor is given. Determining their factor weights by using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the comprehensive similar series in them is carried out, and the most similar soft ground improvement method to ideal one is found out. It is discussed how to choose the input parameters of the decision model. Using the MATLAB-NNT, a decision model of the soft soil improvement of the expressway with 4 parameters is established. After trained by input data and target data, recollected by same data and simulated by new input data, the result of the model is satisfied, and the model is effective.
     4. In view of the uncertainty of index for evaluating soft ground improvement programs, combining with fuzzy matter-element method and the entropy value theory, the fuzzy matter-element model is established based on entropy value theory. The weights are calculated according to the method of information entropy indicating the availing value of data, and the problem of weight allocation is solved. The model is applied for programs evaluation of improving expressway soft ground and a reasonable program is got which provides a new way to select programs for improving soft ground.
     5. The factors that affect the decision of soft ground improvement method have the features of incompleteness and uncertainty, making a decision of the soft soil improvement methods is a Grey System Theory problem essentially. By means of Grey system theory, the new decision model is established. In this model, the evaluation indexes of the schemes and their weights are reasonably decided; the optimal scheme is selected by calculating the relational grade to attain the selection and order arrangement for the schemes. The results of the actual examples indicated that the decision model is reasonable, valuable and it is convenient to use.
     6. Adaptive resonance theory is used in technical decision of expressway ground improvement. Decision model based on adaptive resonance theory is set up for the first time. The result proves that the model is valid and easy to realize.
     7. The basic design computational process theory of dry jet mixing pile is studied. Three optimization models are set up based on the genetic algorithm, particle swarm and nonlinear theory for dry jet mixing pile, and the optimization design system of dry jet mixing pile is programmed. Finally, the results of the actual examples indicated the validity and feasibility of the two optimization methods.
引文
[1]张诚厚,袁文明,戴济群.高速公路软基处理.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997
    [2]黄文熙.土的工程性质.北京:水利电力出版社,1983
    [3]何天牛.软土成因分析与高速公路软基路堤设计.公路勘察设计,1997(1):69-72
    [4]刘小敏,刘松玉,杜延军.我国高速公路建设的主要岩土工程问题.见:岩土工程青年专家学术论坛文集.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1998
    [5]雷华阳,肖树芳.软土结构性的试验研究及其工程特性的影响.吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(1):106-110
    [6]E.W.Brand L.R.P.Brenner.Soft clay engineering.Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company,Amsterdam,1981
    [7]Arai,K.,Oath,H.and Kojima.K.Estimation of soil parameters based on monitored movement of subsoil under consolidation.Soils and Foundations,1984,24(4):95-108
    [8]徐泽中,方涤华,姜朴,等.沪宁高速公路软土的工程特性研究.水利水电科技进展,1998(2):9-12
    [9]田洪水,肖俊华,赵淑慧,等.黄河三角洲软土的特征及地基处理方法.山东建筑工程学院学报,2003,1(4):24-27
    [10]侯树刚,陈静.软土的工程特性研究及地基处理-以连云港地区为例.岩土工程界,2003,6(10):35-36
    [11]邓超文.揭普高速公路软土特征与地基处理.广东交通职业技术学院学报,2003,2(2):27-29
    [12]周龙翔,童华炜,王梦恕,等.广州软土的工程特性及地基处理方法的对比研究.北京交通大学学报,2006,30(1):17-20
    [13]徐国文,刘多文.洞庭湖区高速公路软土特性及处理方法.中南公路工程,2003,28(2):65-67
    [14]刘俊洪,陈斌.滨海软土工程特性及其加固效果分析.西部探矿工程,2005(113):8-9
    [15]顾宝和.岩土工程勘察技术现状及发展问题述评.工程勘察,1998(4):3-8
    [16]沈珠江.原状取土还是室内试验.岩土工程学报,1996,18(5):90-91
    [17]张振.公路软土地基勘察与处理技术初探.四川建材,2007,6:122-123
    [18]陈新墨.软土地基勘察技术研究现状及若下问题的探讨.土工基础,2006,20(4):75-78
    [19]孟高头,姜珂,刘事莲,等.利用孔压静力触探快速划分土层与土类.见:山的呼唤-张咸恭教授八十华诞暨从事地质工作六十年庆贺文集.北京:地震出版社,1999,336-340
    [20]Gupta,R.C.,Davidson,J.L.Piezoprobe determination coefficient of consolidation.Soils and Foundations,1986,26(3):12-22
    [21]Janbu,I.and Senneset,K.Effective stress interpretation of in-situ static penetration tests.Proc.1st European Symposium on Penetration Testing,Vol.2.2,Stockholm,Sweden,1974,181-195
    [22]Schmertmann,J.H.Penetration pore pressure effects on qnasi-static cone bearing.Proc.1st European Symposium on Penetration Testing,Vol.2,1974,345-351
    [23]吴汉杰,陈耀蝉.瞬态面波勘探技术在高速公路软基勘察中的应用.西部探矿工程,2005(10):189-191
    [24]刘松玉.公路地基处理.南京:东南大学出版社,2001
    [25]杜永安.京秦高速公路(廊坊段)软基处理施工简介.北京公路,1998(6):31-33
    [26]杨学民,赵忠义,陈少平.软土地基处理技术在杭甬高速公路上的应用.黑龙江交通科技,1997(3)
    [27]徐勇夫,陈冠军.高速公路软土路基处理方法的研究.华东公路,1998(3):43-45
    [28]蔡家范,许道化.沪宁高速公路软土地基综合处理技术研究和实践.水利水电科技进展,1998(2):1-4
    [29]陈少锋.道路软基处理常用方法简介及评价.云南交通科技,1998(4):12-14
    [30]史焕湖.地基处理方法的复合应用.华东公路,1997(1):54-56
    [31]罗宇光,俞建立.洪湾大桥引道软基施工中的问题分析与处理.华东公路,1997(1):47-50
    [32]秦建庆,孟杰武,王文星.水泥土搅拌桩复合地基几个参数的探讨.华东公路,1997(5):7-10
    [33]洪均,李国维.固结法中塑料插板与袋装砂井施工工艺的比较.华东公路,1998(5):47-50
    [34]漆光荣.福建高速公路软基病害处治方案.公路工程地质,1997(4):1-8
    [35]张嘉翔.引道工程路基路面设计.公路勘察设计,1997(S1):18-25
    [36]王家强.南沙互通式立交段软土地基处理.公路勘察设计,1997(S):26-30
    [37]马永强.三种软基处理新技术在高速公路中的应用.西部探矿工程,2004,95(4):144-146
    [38]郭院成,张浩华,周同和.高速公路高填方软基处理方法的对比分析.郑州大学学报,2002,23(2):31-33
    [39]魏汝龙.软粘土的强度和变形.北京:人民交通出版社.1987
    [40]张忠坤,候学渊,刘国彬,等.路堤下复合地基沉降发展的计算方法探讨.公路,1998(10):31-36
    [41]赵成刚.土力学的现状及其数值分析方法中某些问题的讨论.岩土力学,2006,27(8):1361-1362
    [42]折学森.软土地基沉降计算.北京:人民交通出版社,1998
    [43]吴钰,徐泽中.不同方法估算路基最终沉降量的分析研究.水利水电科技进展,1998(2):17-21
    [44]殷宗泽,朱泓,吴钰.沪宁高速公路地基沉降有限元计算分析.水利水电科技进展,1998(2):22-26
    [45]Arai,K.,Ohta,H.and Yasui,T.,Simple optimization techniques for evaluating deformation module from field observations.Soils and Foundation,1983,23(1):107-113
    [46]Kabir,M.G.and Lutenegger,A.J.,In situ estimation of the coefficient of consolidation in clays.Clay Geotech,1990(27):58-67
    [47]Lambe,T.W.Methods of estimating settlement.Proc.ASCE.JSMFD,V01.90,No.SM5,1964
    [48]Simons.N.E,The stress path method of settlement analysis applied to London clay.Stress-strain behavior of soils[C].G.T.Foulis & Co.ltd,1971
    [49]Davis,E.H,and Poulos,H.G.The use of elastic theory for settlement prediction under three-dimensional condition.Geo-technique,Vol.18,No.1
    [50]Skempton,A.W,and Bjerum,L.A contribution to the settlement analysis of foundations on clay.Geo-technique,Vol.7,No.4
    [51]彭涛,梁杏,杨岸英,等 基于RBF神经网络的软基短期沉降预测研究.地质科技情报,2005,24(4):99-102
    [52]罗战友,龚晓南,杨晓军.全过程沉降量的灰色verhulst预测方法.水利学报,2003,(3):29-32
    [53]周建伟,周爱国,刘晓.软基沉降的BP神经网络和灰色系统联合预测.地质科技情报,2005,24(S1):109-111
    [54]高玮,郑颖人.岩土工程位移预测神经网络建模的几个问题.地下空间,2001,21(S1):369-367
    [55]邓英尔,谢和平.全过程沉降预测的新模型与方法.岩土力学,2005,26(01):1-4
    [56]LIU Yong-jian.Prediction of final settlement of soft ground for expressway by using artificial network.Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2000,17(16):15-18
    [57]雷学文,白世伟,孟庆山.灰色预测在软土地基沉降分析中的应用.岩土力学,2000,21(2):145-147
    [58]张慧梅,李云鹏,毛成.人工神经网络在软土地基路基沉降预测中的应用.长安大学学报(自然科学版),2002,22(4):20-22
    [59]夏元友,刘鹏,莫介臻.高速公路软基沉降预测系统及其应用研究.公路,2005(8):275-279
    [60]郭耿新.沪宁高速公路软基处理方法优选.地基处理,1996(1):23-28
    [61]宋应文,唐业绩.地基处理评价法.地基基础工程,1993,3(1):7-12
    [62]王建华,李夕兵.模糊数学优选理论评价和选择地基处理方案.西部探矿工程,2002,14(3):21-24
    [63]刘国.用模糊数学方法选择软土地基加固方案.水文地质工程地质,2000,(4):17-19
    [64]祝启坤,张小敏.地基处理方案的模糊优化.水文地质工程地质,2002(5):40-42
    [65]冯夏庭,林韵梅.岩石力学与工程专家系统.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1993
    [66]冯夏庭,林韵梅.岩石力学与工程专家系统研究新进展.岩石力学与工程学报,1995,14(1):85-91
    [67]王芝银,刘怀恒.地下工程支护方案的距离分析和模糊评价.岩石力学与工程学报,1993,12(4):296-303
    [68]夏元友,朱瑞赓.岩质边坡稳定性多人多层次模糊综合评价系统研究.工程地质学报,1997(1):46-53
    [69]Chen X.Y,Xia Y.Y,Yan H.Z.Multi-layer Fuzzy Decision for Improvement of Freeway Underground Proceedings of the 3rd Sino-Japan Geotechnical Symposium Chongqing,China,November,2007,9:118-123
    [70]冯仲仁,朱瑞赓等.高速公路软基处理方案的多层次模糊评价.岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(6):915-918
    [71]刘挺,蔡升华.层次分析法在地基处理方案优化中的应用.电力勘测,2002,35(3):31-35
    [72]徐立新.公路软基地处理-微机设计CAD系统的开发与应用,1998(2):24-26
    [73]徐泽中,殷宗泽,赵维炳.软土地基综合处理设计程序研制.水利水电科技进展,1998(2):46-48
    [74]宋应文.地基处理智能辅助设计系统.岩土工程学报,1996,18(1):54-59
    [75]胡春林,王茂丽,李坤.基于沉降控制的软土路基粉喷桩加固设计方法探讨.岩土力学,2006,27(6):969-972
    [76]师旭超,汪稔,王文科.水泥粉喷桩复合地基的优化设计探讨.土工基础,2002,16(4):37-39
    [77]甘先永.基于ANSYS的粉喷桩复合地基设计方案优化.铁道科学与工程学报,2006,3(2):58-61
    [78]刘涌.基于ANSYS的粉喷桩复合地基设计方案优化.中外公路,2006,26(2):10-13
    [79]张冬梅,黄宏伟,王箭明.以沉降控制的粉喷桩的优化设计.建筑技术,2000,31(3):156-158
    [80]李志远.粉喷桩软基处理的优化设计研究.广东土木与建筑,2007(6):28-30
    [81]史志植.高级人工智能.北京:科学出版社.1998
    [82]杜晓明,于永利.基于范例推理的多准则综合评价.系统工程理论和实践,1992(2):50-53
    [83]周继成.人工神经网络-第六代计算机的实玑.北京:科学普及出版社,1993
    [84]周开利,康耀红.神经网络模型及其MATLAB仿真程序设计.北京:清华大学出版社,1998
    [85]焦李成.神经网络系统理论.西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,1990
    [86]苏舍明.Matlab工具箱应用.北京:电子工业出版社,2004
    [87]陈贻源.模糊数学.武汉:华中科技大学出版社,1984
    [88]肖位枢.模糊数学基础与应用.北京:航空工业出版社,1992
    [89]王彩华,宋连天.模糊论方法学.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1987
    [90]蔡文.物元模型及其应用.北京:科学技术文献出版社,1994
    [91]张斌,雍岐东,肖芳淳.模糊物元分析.北京:石油工业出版社,1997
    [92]Sah N K,sheoery P R,Upadhyaya L N.Maximum likelihood estimation of solpe stability.Int.J.Rock Mech.Sci and Geomech,1994,31(1):47-53
    [93]Liu Muyu,Zhu Ruigeng.Case-based reasoning for slope stability evaluation and its application.Journal of Wuhan University of Technology,2001,16(6)
    [94]Ramon Lopez de Mantaras,case-based reasoning,Lecture Notes in Computer Science,2001:127-145
    [95]Nie-Jia Yan,Jyh-Bin Yang,Applying case-based reasoning technique to retaining wall selection,Automation in construction,1998(7):271-283
    [96]Petra Perner,Are case-based reasoning and dissimilarity-based classification two sides of the same coin,Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,2002(15):193-203
    [97]Barry Smyth,Mark T.Keane,Adaptation-guided retrieval questioning the similarity assumption in reasoning,Artificial Intelligence in Medicine,1998(02):249-293
    [98]Qijun Xia,Ming Rao,Dynamic case-based reasoning for process operation support systems,Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 1999(12):343-61
    [99]陈向阳,夏元友,鄢恒珍.高速公路软基处理方案智能决策模型研究.中外公路,2006,26(5):127-129
    [100]冯仲仁,陈向阳,鄢恒珍.基于范例推理的公路软基处理方案决策模型.岩土力学,2004,25(11):1779-1781
    [101]冯仲仁,朱瑞赓.基于MATLAB-NNT的高速公路软基处理方案评价模型.岩土力学,2002,23(4):225-227
    [102]Cai,Y.D.The Application of Artificial Neural- Network in Determining the Blasting Classification of Rocks,Proc.2nd Int.Conf.Engineering Blasting Technique,Kunming,P.R.China,Beijing:Peking Univ Press,P24-27
    [103]Cai,Y.Soil Classification by Neural-Network,Advances in Engineering Software,Vol.22,No.2,95-97
    [104]Jacobs R A.Increased Rate of Convergence through Learning Rate Adaptation.Neural Network,1998(1):295-307
    [105]Hecht Nielsen R Theory of the Back-propagation Neural Network,Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Network,1998(1):593-605
    [106]Goh,A.T.C.(1995b)Empirical Design in Geo-technique using Neural Networks,Geo-technique,Vol.45,No.4,P709-714
    [107]刘沐宇,朱瑞赓.基于模糊相似优先的边坡稳定性评价范例推理方法.岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(8):1188-1193
    [108]陈向阳,夏元友,鄢恒珍.基于模糊相似优先的软基处理决策模型.中外公路,2005,25(6):33-36
    [109]吴良刚.基于事例的模糊专家系统研究[博士学位论文].长沙:中南大学,2001
    [110]王广月,刘键,芮洪范.深基坑支护方案的模糊物元评价方法.山东大学学报,2004,34(2):84-88
    [111]辛若朋,范春梅,段元振.模糊熵值法在工程评标中的应用.交通科技与经济,2005(6):7-9
    [112]郭亚军.综合评价理论与方法.北京:科学出版社,002
    [113]郭显光.改进的熵值法及其在经济效益评价中的应用.系统工程理论与实践,1998(12):98-102
    [114]雍岐东,倪宏伟.用模糊信息熵物元评价法优选气田开发方案.天然气工业,2004,23(2):85-87
    [115]邓聚龙.灰色系统.北京:国防工业出版社,1985
    [116]邓聚龙.灰色系统基本方法.武汉:华中科技大学出版社,1988
    [117]邓聚龙.灰色预测与评价.武汉:华中科技大学出版社,1988
    [118]赵梦冬,赵学荣.灰色系统理论在深基坑支护方案中的应用.天津城市建设学院学报,1997,3(4):89-94
    [119]吴小萍,詹振炎.基于灰色和模糊集理论的铁路方案多目标综合评价方法及模型研究.铁道学报,2001,23(5):107-113
    [120]冯仲仁,陈向阳,鄢恒珍.基于灰色理论的软基处理方案决策模型.武汉理工大学学报,2004,26(10):38-41
    [121]陈向阳,夏元友,鄢恒珍.基于ART网络的高速公路软基处理决策模型.武汉理工大学学报,2007,29(2):104-106
    [122]郑束宁.优化设计理论在粉喷桩工程中的应用.工程地质学报,2003(11):280-284
    [123]王小平,曹立明.遗传算法-理论、应用与软件实现.西安:西安交通大学出版社,2002
    [124]玄光男,程润伟.遗传算法与工程设计.科学出版社,2000
    [125]Goh,A.T.C.(1996b)Pile Driving Records Reanalyzed using Neural Networks,Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-ASCE,Vol.122,No.6,492-495
    [126]Chun,W.T.,Chow,Y.K.& Liu,L.F.(1995)Neural-Network-an Alternative to Pile Driving Formulas,Computers and Geotechnical,Vol.17,No.2,135-156
    [127]Goh,A.T.C.(1995c)Modeling Soil Correlations using Neural Networks,Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering;Vol.121,No.4,275-278
    [128]杨维,李歧强.粒子群优化算法综述.中国工程科学,2004,6(5):87-94
    [129]李梅,夏元友,曹杉杉,等.粒子群算法在抗滑桩优化设计中的应用.武汉理工大学学报,2006,28(12):98-101
    [130]张惠,李立增,王成华.粒子群算法在确定边坡最小安全系数中的应用,石家庄铁道学院学报,2004(6):1-4
    [131]Jaroslaw S.S.Particle Swarm Optimization.AIAA,1002-1235
    [132]Goh,A.T.C.(1996a)Neural-Network Modeling of CPT Seismic Liquefaction Data,Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-ASCE,Vol.122,No.1,70-73
    [133]Kreinovich V,Quintana C and Fuentes O.Genetic algorithms-What Fitness Scaling is Optimal.Cybern and Systems,1993,24(1):9-26
    [134]Shi Y,Eberhart,R C.Parameters election in particle swarm optimization.Evolutionary Programming Ⅶ:Proceeding of the Seventh Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming[C],NewYork,1998
    [135]李炳宇.PSO算法在工程优化问题中的应用.计算机工程与应用,2004(18):74-76
    [136]曾建潮,介婧.微粒群算法.北京:科学出版社,2004

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700