糖尿病心肌病发病机制、早期诊断和治疗的实验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
背景
     心血管病变是糖尿病患者的主要死亡原因,约80%死于心血管病。糖尿病心肌病(diabetic cardiomyopathy,DCM)作为一种独立的糖尿病心脏并发症日益引起重视,诊断DCM的三个要素是:(1)明确的长期糖尿病病史可能引起的心脏损伤。(2)存在心脏收缩、舒张功能异常或其他结构功能损伤的证据。(3)可以排除其他已知的心脏疾病或其他有关疾病引起的心脏损害。DCM发生后,随着心功能的进行性恶化,死亡率很高。近20余年来,国内外学者在DCM方面进行了大量的基础和临床研究,虽然取得了阶段性成果,但DCM的发生机制、早期诊断和治疗措施,仍处在探索中,深入研究DCM的发生机制,探讨阻断DCM发病途径无疑对DCM的诊治具有重要意义。
     DCM的发生涉及多种影响因素。临床研究表明,DCM通常以舒张性心力衰竭为早期表现,即心肌松弛性减低和僵硬度增大,心肌间质纤维化在舒张性心力衰竭的发生发展中起重要作用。无高血压和冠心病的糖尿病患者心肌活检也证实有心肌间质纤维化,因此,心肌间质纤维化在DCM发病中的作用逐渐引起人们的重视,但其发生机制尚不明确。在糖尿病肾脏纤维化和细胞培养实验中证实,血糖可以刺激TSP-1表达升高,而TSP-1是非活性型TGFβ_1重要的激活因子,随后激活型的A-TGFβ_1可以通过其细胞膜上的受体,将促纤维化信号传递到细胞内,进一步激活Smads蛋白家族,Smads相关蛋白的激活可以调控纤维基质和相关因子的表达。以上这些信号分子与糖尿病肾病的关系,国外可见零散的研究报道,但这一系列因子与DCM心肌间质纤维化的关系,国内外均未见系统的研究报道。
BackgroundThe main death reason of patients with diabetes mellitus is cardiovasculardiseases and 80% of diabetic patients died for these complications. Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), as an independent diabetic cardiac complication, has been paid more attention to. The three gist of DCM diagnosis was brought forward: (1) A definitive long diabetic duration, which might result in cardiac impairment; (2) The evidence of systolic, diastolic dysfunction damages and structure changes in heart; (3) To exclude the cardiac damage of other known heart diseases and concerned diseases. The mortality of DCM is very high along with the progressed cardiac function deterioration. For recent two decades, a number of basical and clinical studies on DCM have been finished. The phasic achievements were obstained, but the machanism, early diagnosis and therapeutic measures of DCM were still explored. It is important for treatment of DCM to explore deeply the machanism and the methods to block the pathway of DCM development.The development of DCM is multifactorial. In clinical study, DCM was characterized by diastolic heart failure, decreased relaxation and increased stiffness at the early stage. The myocardial interstitial fibrosis is the main mechanism of DCM development and was observed in myocardial biopsy of diabetes mellitus without hypertension and coronary heart disease. The effects of myocardial interstitial fibrosis on DCM were gradually paid attention to, but the mechanism is still unclear. In a foreign study about interstitial fibrosis of diabetic nephropathy and cell culture, it was
    reported that high glucose levels could stimulate TSP-1 expression, which is an important activator of latent-TGFPj (L-TGFp,). Active-TGFpi (A-TGFp,) can propagate the fibrosis-inducing signal into cells by its cell-membrane receptor to activate intracellular Smads family members. Activatory Smads can regulate and control expression of collagenous fibers and related factors. There were a few of reports about the relationship of these molecules and diabetic nephropathy, but the relationship between these molecules and DCM was still not reported systematically. According to the comprehensive analysis on the studies of cell signal pathway on DCM, we supposed that "Glucose/TSP-l/TGFP)/Smads" signal transduction pathway (GTTS pathway) might exert important effects on DCM. We studied the effects of GTTS pathway on occurrence and progress of DCM by molecular biology, cytobiology and echocardiography. In addition, some studies reported that RAS was activated in hyperglycemic environment. As an important factor to stimulate TSP-1 expression, Angll can induce activation of GTTS fibrosis pathway by its ATI receptor. By using valsartan, the ATI receptor antagonist, to treat diabetic animals, we want to unravel the effect of valsartan and its molecular-biological mechanism. It is anticipated to establish new target point and method for early diagnosis and treatment of DCM. Objective(1) To establish a DCM animal model of type 2 diabetes mellitus.(2) To observe the damages of myocardial ultrastructure and cardiac function.(3) To prove the existence of GTTS pathway in the deterioration of DCM. To explore the effects of GTTS pathway in DCM by the molecular biological techniques.(4) To evaluate the effects of valsartan on GTTS pathway and the feasibility of clinical treatment on DCM. To offer new target molecules for DCM treatment. Methods40 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into 3 groups: a control group (n=8), a DCM group (n=16) and a valsartan group (n=16). The control group rats were fed a normal chow diet. The DCM group and valsartan group rats were fed a high-fat and high-calorie diet. After 5 weeks on either diet, the DCM and valsartan groups were
    given with STZ (30mg/kg) by intraperitoneal injection, but the control group animals were injected with equal citrate acid/sodium citrate buffer solution after 12 hours fast. The standards of diabetic animals are the concentrations of fasting blood glucose ^ ll.lmmol/1 by 2 consecutive analyses and the insulin sensitivity index (ISI) is lower than that of the control group. The animals, which did not reach the above standard, were excluded. After that, the valsartan group animals were dosed orally with valsartan (30mg/kg) and the other two groups animal were given with 0.9% saline every day for 16 weeks duration after glucose was heightened. The detection contents were listed below. (1) The animals were weighted every week and the contents of fast blood-glucose were detected every two weeks. (2) The contents of fast blood-glucose, insulin, triglyceride (TG), cholesterol (Choi) and ISI were analyzed before STZ injection, one week after STZ injection and at the end of the experiment. (3) The common echocardiographic indexes were detected before the experiment, the 12th week after hyperglycemia and at the end of the experiment. (4) Electrocardiograms of animals were recorded and hemodynamics indexes were measured by cardiac catheterization. (5) Myocardial ultrastructral and histopathological changes were observed. (6) The content of collagen were quantified by Masson-staining. (7) The mRNA expression of TSP-1, TGFpi, TGFpR II, Smad2, Smad3 and Smad7 of GTTS pathway were detected by quantification real-time RT-PCR. (8) The protein levels of TSP-1, A-TGFpj, L-TGFPi, TGFpR II, P-Smad2, P-Smad3 and Smad7 were detected by Western-blot and immunohistochemistry. Results1. Body weight and biochemical indices measurementBefore STZ injection, body weight values of the DCM and valsartan groups were significantly higher than that of the control group (PO.05). Fast blood-glucose was insignificantly different between the three groups (P>0.05). The content of fast insulin of the other two groups were significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05), but ISI of the other two groups were significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.01). Serum TG and Choi of the other two groups were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05).
    One week after STZ injection, body weight values of the three groups were insignificant (P>0.05). Fast blood-glucose of the other two groups was obviously increased, compared with that of the control group (P<0.01). The content of fast insulin was insignificantly different between the three groups (P>0.05). ISI of the other two groups were still significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.01). Serum TG and Choi of the other two groups were still significantly higher than those of the control group (PO.01).At the end of the experiment, body weight values of the DCM and valsartan groups were obviously decreased, compared with that of the control group (PO.01). Fast blood-glucose of the other two groups was still significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.01). The content of fast insulin was still insignificantly different between the three groups (P>0.05). ISI of the other two groups were still significantly lower than that of the control group (PO.01). Serum TG and Choi of the other two groups were still significantly higher than those of the control group (PO.01).2. Echocardiographic detectionMitral and tricuspid valvular regurgition detection: None of 8 animals in the control group showed mitral and tricuspid valvular regurgitation. In 11 animals of the DCM group, mild mitral valvular regurgitation was occurred in 3 rats; moderate mitral valvular regurgitation was occurred in one rat; severe mitral valvular regurgitation was occurred in one rat; mild tricuspid valvular regurgitation was occurred in one rat; moderate tricuspid valvular regurgitation was occurred in 2 rats; severe tricuspid valvular regurgitation was occurred in one rat; 2 rats of the DCM group showed both mitral and tricuspid valvular simultaneous regurgition; 4 rats of the DCM group did not show valvular regurgition. In 13 animals of the valsartan group, mild mitral valvular regurgitation was occurred in 2 rats; moderate mitral valvular regurgitation was occurred in one rat; mild tricuspid valvular regurgitation was occurred in 2 rats; moderate tricuspid valvular regurgitation was occurred in one rat; there was no rats, which showed severe mitral or tricuspid valvular regurgitation and the two valvular simultaneous regurgitation; 7 rats of the valsartan group did not
    show valvular regurgition. There were no rats with valvular regurgitation in the control group. The incidence of valvular regurgitation in the DCM group was 63.64% and 46.15% in the valsartan group. Fisher analysis: Compared with that of the control group, the incidence of valvular regurgitation in the DCM group and the valsartan group was significantly increased (PO.05). Compared with that of the DCM group, the incidence of valvular regurgitation in the valsartan group was decreased, but which was insignificant (P>0.05).The common echocardiographic indices: 12 weeks after hyperglycemia, Compared with the indices of the control group, left atrial dimension (LAD) of the DCM group enlarged obviously (P<0.01), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the DCM group was obviously decreased (P<0.05). LAD of the valsartan group was significantly smaller than that of the DCM group (PO.05).At the end of the experiment, compared with the indices of the control group, LAD, left ventricular dimension (LVD) and right ventricular dimension (RVD) of the DCM group enlarged obviously (P<0.05~0.01). LVEF of the DCM group was obviously decreased (P<0.05). LAD and LVD of the valsartan group were significantly smaller than those of the DCM group (P<0.05). LVEF of the valsartan group was significantly higher than that of the DCM group (PO.05). LAD of the valsartan group was significantly larger than that of the control group (P<0.05).3. Electrocardiogram recordationElectrocardiograms (ECG) of 8 animals in the control group were all normal and ECGs of 11 rats in the DCM group were all abnormal. 9 rats of the DCM group showed characteristic QRS wave interchanges and 2 rats of the DCM group showed complex arrhythmia. Change of the valsartan group ECG was mild. 6 rats of the valsartan group showed normal ECG, 7 rats showed QRS wave interchanges ECG, and none of the valsartan group showed complex arrhythmia. There were no rats with arrhythmia in the control group. The incidence of arrhythmia was 100% in the DCM group and 53.85% in the valsartan group. Fisher analysis: Compared with that of the control group, the incidence of arrhythmia in the DCM group and the valsartan group was significantly increased (PO.05~0.01). Compared with that of the DCM group,
    the incidence of arrhythmia in the valsartan group was significantly decreased (PO.05).4. Hemodynamic indices determinationAt the end of the experiment, compared with the indices of the control group, left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) of the DCM group decreased obviously (P<0.01), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) increased significantly (PO.01), the peak left ventricular pressure descending rate (-dp/dtmax) and the peak left ventricular pressure ascending rate (dp/dtmax) decreased significantly (PO.01), while the relaxation time constant (T) of the DCM group was longer than that of the control group (P<0.01). Compared with the indices of the DCM group, LVSP of the valsartan group increased obviously (P<0.05), LVEDP decreased significantly (P<0.05), -dp/dtmax was increased obviously (P<0.05). The T of the valsartan group was shorter than that of the DCM group (P<0.05). LVEDP of the valsartan group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The -dp/dtmax of the valsartan group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).5. Ultrastructural change observation by transmission electron microscopy The left ventricular myocytes from the control group arranged regularly. Thepericellular membrane was uninterrupted and intact. The thick and thin myofilament arranged regularly. The sarcomere and light dark band were clear. The uniformly sized mitochondrial was abundant and showed round or oval shape. The nuclear membrane was smooth and intact. A typical distribution of heterochromatin in the form of clusters at the nuclear membrane was present in all cardiomyocyte nuclei. Intercalated disk was clear, intact and normally structured. A little fibroblast and collagenous fibers distributed in extra-cellular matrix. The microvessel lumen was normal and the structure of endothelial cell was normal.The left ventricular myocytes from the DCM group arranged irregularly. The pericellular membrane was interrupted and unclear. The local myofibril was disintegrated. The myofilament was distorted and interrupted. The sarcomere was in a bad apposition. The swelling mitochondrial increased and accumulated. The finger print mitochondrial could be found. The nuclear shape was abnormal with deep notch.
    There was accumulative euchromatin. The unclear Intercalated disk was distorted and interrupted. A lot of collagenous fibers distributed in extra-cellular matrix. The microvessel lumen was narrow. The endothelial cell was swelling obviously and protruded to the lumen.Compared with the DCM group, the ultrastructural change of the valsartan group was obviously improved. The myocytes from the valsartan group arranged more regularly than the DCM group. The phenomenon that the local myofibril was disintegrated was decreased. The T tubule was moderately dilated. The mitochondrial was more regular than the DCM group and the finger print mitochondrial was not found. The nuclear shape was more regular than the DCM group. Intercalated disk was improved. The collagenous fibers in extra-cellular matrix decreased obviously and the swelling endothelial cell of microvessel was alleviated.6. Pathological detectionThe myocytes from the control group arranged regularly. The size of the nuclear was uniform. The staining cytoplasm was homogeneous. The myocytes from the DCM group arranged irregularly. The nuclear was irregular and the interrupted myofibril arranged irregularly. The valsartan group was obviously improved. The myocytes from the valsartan group arranged more regularly than the DCM group. The interrupted myofibril was not common. The nuclear shape was more regular than the DCM group.7. The content of collagen detection by Masson-stainingThe myocyte was red or yellow and the collagen was green or blue. The collagen tissue was appropriate arranged among cardiomyocytes in the control group. However, collagen tissue increased markedly, and disrupted in some area in the DCM group. The collagen tissue decreased and arranged regularly in the valsartan group, compared with the DCM group. Quantitative analysis results: The content of collagen in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (P<0.01). The content of collagen in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (P<0.05). There was a significantly positive correlation of the collagen content with the fast blood-glucose in the DCM group (r = 0.746, PO.01).
    8. Immunohistochemistry detectionThe positive reaction of TSP-1, A-TGFp, and TGFpRlI protein were stained brown and absent in myocardial cytoplasm. There was uniform distribution of weak brown granule in the control group. There was thick brown granule in the DCM group. The granule of the valsartan group was weaker than the DCM group.There was uniform distribution of weak brown granule on L-TGFpi in the control group. The granule of the DCM group and the valsartan group was thicker than the DCM group.It is a rare case to observe the expression of P-Smad2/3 in the control group. There was obvious brown granule of P-Smad2/3 in the DCM group. The granule of P-smad2/3 in the valsartan group was weaker than the DCM group.There was uniform distribution of weak brown granule on Smad7 in the control group. There was thick brown granule on Smad7 in the DCM group. The granule of the valsartan group was even thicker than the DCM group.9. The mRNA expression of several genes on GTTS pathwayThe expression of TSP-1 mRNA in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (PO.05). The expression of TSP-1 mRNA in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (P<0.05).The expression of TGFpi mRNA in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (PO.01). The expression of TGFPi mRNA in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (P<0.05) and higher than that of the control group (PO.05).The expression of TGFPIIR mRNA in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (PO.05). The expression of TGFp IIR mRNA in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (PO.05).The expression of Smad2 mRNA in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (PO.01). The expression of Smad2 mRNA in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (PO.05) and higher than that of the control group (PO.05).The expression of Smad3 mRNA in the DCM group was higher significantly
    than that of the control group (P<0.05). The expression of Smad3 mRNA in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (P<0.05).The expression of Smad7 mRNA in the valsartan group was higher significantly than those of the other two groups (PO.05). The expression of Smad7 mRNA in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (P<0.05).The Smad2/Smad7 in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (P<0.05). The smad2/smad7 in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (P<0.05).The Smad3/Smad7 in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (P<0.05). The Smad3/Smad7 in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (PO.05).In the DCM group, the fast blood-glucose showed a significantly positive correlation with the expression of TSP-1, TGFp), Smad2 mRNA (r=0.762, 0.714, 0.686, PO.05~0.01).In the DCM group, the collagen content showed a significantly positive correlation with TSP-1, TGFp,, TGFp IIR, Smad2 mRNA (r=0.717, 0.632, 0.675, 0.703, PO.05).In the DCM group, there was a significantly positive correlation of TSP-1 mRNA with LVEDP (r = 0.658, PO.05), in contrast, there was a significantly negative correlation of TSP-1 mRNA with LVSP and -dp/dtmax (r = -0.605,-0.694, PO.05). There was a significantly positive correlation of TGFPi mRNA with LVEDP (r = 0.689, PO.05), in contrast, there was a significantly negative correlation of TGFpi mRNA with -dp/dtmax and LVEF (r = -0.634, -0.647, PO.05). There was a significantly negative correlation of TGFP IIR mRNA with dp/dtmax and -dp/dtmax (r = -0.628, -0.729, PO.05).There was a significantly positive correlation of Smad2 mRNA with LVEDP (r = 0.669, PO.05), in contrast, there was a significantly negative correlation of Smad2 mRNA with -dp/dtmax (r = -0.738, PO.05). There was a significantly positive correlation of Smad3 mRNA with LVEDP (r = 0.746, PO.05), in contrast, there was a significantly negative correlation of Smad3 mRNA with
    -dp/dtmax (r = -0.639, PO.05). There was no insignificant correlation of Smad7 mRNA with the other indices.10. The protein expression of several factors on GTTS pathwayThe expression of TSP-1 protein in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (P<0.05). The expression of TSP-1 protein in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (P<0.05).The expression of A-TGFPi protein in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (PO.01). The expression of A-TGFPi protein in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (PO.05).The expression of L-TGFpi protein in the DCM group and the valsartan group were both higher significantly than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no difference of the expression of L-TGF|3i protein between the DCM group and the valsartan group (P>0.05).The expression of P-Smad2 protein in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (PO.01). The expression of P-Smad2 protein in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (P<0.01) and higher than that of the control group (P<0.01).The expression of P-Smad3 protein in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (P<0.01). The expression of P-Smad3 protein in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (PO.05) and higher than that of the control group (PO.05).The expression of Smad7 protein in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (PO.05). The expression of Smad7 protein in the valsartan group was higher significantly than those of the other two groups (PO.05~0.01).The P-Smad2/Smad7 in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (PO.05). The P-Smad2/Smad7 in the valsartan group was lower significantly than that of the DCM group (PO.05).The P-Smad3/Smad7 in the DCM group was higher significantly than that of the control group (PO.05). The P-Smad3/Smad7 in the valsartan group was lower
    significantly than that of the DCM group (PO.05).In the DCM group, the fast blood-glucose showed a significantly positive correlation with the expression of TSP-1, A-TGFp,, P-Smad2, P-Smad3 protein (r=0.735, 0.726, 0.807, 0.764, PO.05~0.01).In the DCM group, the collagen content showed a significantly positive correlation with the expression of TSP-1, A-TGFpi, P-Smad2, P-Smad3 protein (r=0.750, 0.820, 0.689, 0.744, PO.05~0.01).In the DCM group, there was a significantly positive correlation of TSP-1 protein with LVEDP (r = 0.716, PO.05), in contrast, there was a significantly negative correlation of TSP-1 protein with LVSP and -dp/dtmax (r = -0.633, -0.669, PO.05). There was a significantly positive correlation of A-TGFPi protein with LVEDP (r = 0.697, PO.05), in contrast, there was a significantly negative correlation of A- TGFpi protein with -dp/dtmax, dp/dtmax and LVEF (r = -0.717, -0.637, -0.683, PO.05). There was a significantly positive correlation of P-Smad2 protein with LVEDP (r = 0.776, PO.01), in contrast, there was a significantly negative correlation of P-Smad2 protein with -dp/dtmax and LVEF (r = -0.705, -0.637, PO.05). There was a significantly positive correlation of P-Smad3 protein with LVEDP (r = 0.656, PO.05), in contrast, there was a significantly negative correlation of P-Smad3 protein with -dp/dtmax (r = -0.696, PO.05). There was no insignificant correlation of L-TGFpi n Smad7 protein with the other indices. Conclusion(1) A DCM animal model of type 2 diabetes mellitus was established by high-calorie diet, STZ injection of small dose, detection of echocardiography and histopathology. The animal model was valuable for the study of the mechanism in DCM.(2) The main histopathologic changes were collagen deposition and myocardial interstitial fibrosis.(3) The early change was the diastolic dysfunction and the mixed dysfunction (diastolic and systolic dysfunction) ocurred at the late stage of disease.(4) The pathyway of Glucose/TSP-1/ TGFpVSmads was proved in type 2
    diabetes mellitus by quantification real-time RT-PCR and western blot. GTTS pathway showed obviously correlation with the changes of cardiac function and myocardial interstitial fibrosis. The main mechanism of DCM was GTTS pathway.(5) Valsartan can prevent cardiac from damage in DCM. Blocking the effects of Ang II on the factors of GTTS pathway was an important mechanism.
引文
1. Bell DS. Diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26: 2949-2951.
    2. Adeghate E. Molecular and cellular basis of the aetiology and management of diabetic cardiomyopathy: a short review. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004, 261: 187-191.
    3. Hayat SA, Patel B, Khattar RS, et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Sci (Lond). 2004, 107: 539-557.
    4. Codinach HP, Freixa PR. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: concept, heart function, and pathogenesis. An Med Interna. 2002, 19: 313-320.
    5. Cosson S, Kevorkian JP. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: an early sign of diabetic cardiomyopathy? Diabetes Metab. 2003, 29: 455-466.
    6. Daniel C, Wiede J, Krutzsch HC, et al. Thrombospondin-1 is a major activator of TGF-beta in fibrotic renal disease in the rat in vivo. Kidney Int. 2004, 65: 459-468.
    7. Daniel C, Takabatake Y, Mizui M, et al. Antisense oligonucleotides against thrombospondin-1 inhibit activation of tgf-beta in fibrotic renal disease in the rat invivo. Am J Pathol. 2003, 163: 1185-1192.
    8. Hugo C. The thrombospondin 1-TGF-{beta} axis in fibrotic renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003, 18: 1241-1245.
    9. Stenina OI, Krukovets I, Wang K, et al. Increased expression of thrombospondin-1 in vessel wall of diabetic Zucker rat. Circulation. 2003, 107: 3209-3215.
    10. Poczatek MH, Hugo C, Darley-Usmar V, et al. Glucose stimulation of transforming growth factor-beta bioactivity in mesangial cells is mediated by thrombospondin-1. Am J Pathol. 2000, 157: 1353-1363.
    11. Shi Y, Massague J. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003, 113: 685-700.
    12. Kim JH, Kim BK, Moon KC, et al. Activation of the TGF-beta/Smad signaling pathway in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int. 2003, 64: 1715-1721.
    13. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 1047-1053.
    14. Storlien LH, Oakes ND, Pan DA, et al. Syndromes of insulin resistance in the rat. Inducement by diet and amelioration with benfluorex. Diabetes. 1993, 42: 457-462.
    15. Shimoni Y, Ewart HS, Severson D. Type Ⅰ and Ⅱ models of diabetes produce different modifications of K+ currents in rat heart: role of insulin. J Physiol. 1998, 507: 485-496.
    16. Proietto J, Filippis A, Nakhla C, et al. Nutrient-induced insulin resistance. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1999, 151: 143-149.
    17. Reed MJ, Meszaros K, Entes LJ, et al. A new rat model of type 2 diabetes: the fat-fed, streptozotocin-treated rat. Metabolism. 2000, 49: 1390-1394.
    18. Reed MJ, Meszaros K, Entes LJ, et al. Effect of masoprocol on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in a rat model of Type Ⅱ diabetes. Diabetologia. 1999, 42: 102-106.
    19. Straczkowski M, Kowalska I, Gorski J, et al. The effect of a single bout of exhaustive exercise on muscle carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in a rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 2000, 37: 47-53.
    20.张芳林,李果,丁伟等.2型糖尿病性心脏病变早期相关基因的筛选和分析.中华内科杂志.2002,41:530-533.
    21. Kraegen EW, James DE, Bennett SP, et al. In vivo insulin sensitivity in the rat determined by euglycemic clamp. Am J Physiol. 1983, 245: E1-7.
    22. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol. 1979, 237: E214-223.
    23.李光伟,潘孝仁,Lillioja S,et al.检测人群胰岛素敏感性的一项新指数.中华内科杂志.1993,32:656-660.
    24.李晨钟,张素华,舒昌达等.Wistar大鼠的正常血糖—高血浆胰岛素钳夹技术.重庆医科大学学报.1998,23:149-152.
    25. Garg A, Grundy SM. Management of dyslipidemia in NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1990, 13: 153-169.
    26. Garg A. Dyslipoproteinemia and diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998, 27(3):613-25
    27. Schnell O, Muhr D, Weiss M, et al. Reduced myocardial 1231-metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake in newly diagnosed IDDM patients. Diabetes. 1996,45:801-805.
    28. Turpeinen AK, Vanninen E, Kuikka JT, et al. Demonstration of regional sympathetic denervation of the heart in diabetes. Comparison between patients with NIDDM and IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1996,19:1083-1090.
    29. Pacher P, Ungvari Z, Nanasi PP, et al. Electrophysiological changes in rat ventricular and atrial myocardium at different stages of experimental diabetes. Acta Physiol Scand. 1999,166:7-13.
    30. Shimoni Y, Firek L, Severson D, et al. Short-term diabetes alters K+ currents in rat ventricular myocytes. Circ Res. 1994, 74:620-628.
    31. Casis O, Gallego M, Iriarte M, et al. Effects of diabetic cardiomyopathy on regional electrophysiologic characteristics of rat ventricle. Diabetologia. 2000, 43:101-109.
    32. Mizushige K, Yao L, Noma T, et al. Alteration in left ventricular diastolic filling and accumulation of myocardial collagen at insulin-resistant prediabetic stage of a type II diabetic rat model. Circulation. 2000, 101:899-907.
    33. Thompson EW. Structural manifestations of diabetic cardiomyopathy in the rat and its reversal by insulin treatment. Am J Anat. 1988, 182:270-282.
    34. Regan TJ, Lyons MM, Ahmed SS, et al. Evidence for cardiomyopathy in familial diabetes mellitus . J Clin Invest 1977, 60:884-899.
    35. Nunoda S, Genda A, Sugihara N, et al. Quantitative approach to the histopathology of the biopsied right ventricular myocardium in patients with diabetes mellitus. Heart Vessels. 1985,1:43-47.
    36. Mihm MJ, Seifert JL, Coyle CM, et al. Diabetes related cardiomyopathy time dependent echocardiographic evaluation in an experimental rat model. Life Sci. 2001,69:527-542.
    37. Dillmann WH. Diabetes and thyroid-hormone-induced changes in cardiac
     function and their molecular basis. Annu Rev Med. 1989, 40:373-394.
    38. Wang X, Gerdes AM. Chronic pressure overload cardiac hypertrophy and failure in guinea pigs: III. Intercalated disc remodeling. J Mol Cell Cardiol.1999,31:333-343.
    39. Otonkoski T, Hayek A. Constitution of a biphasic insulin response to glucose in human fetal pancreatic beta-cells with glucagon-like peptide 1. J Clin EndocrinolMetab. 1995, 80:3779-3783.
    40. Linn T, Schneider K, Goke B, et al. Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (7-36) amide improves glucose sensitivity in beta-cells of NOD mice. Acta Diabetol. 1996, 33:19-24.
    41. Joffe II, Travers KE, Perreault-Micale CL, et al. Abnormal cardiac function in the streptozotocin-induced non-insulin-dependent diabetic rat: noninvasive assessment with Doppler echocardiography and contribution of the nitric oxide pathway. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999,34:2111-2119.
    42. Litwin SE, Raya TE, Anderson PG, et al. Abnormal cardiac function in the streptozotocin-diabetic rat. Changes in active and passive properties of the left ventricle. J Clin Invest. 1990, 86:481-488.
    43. Trost SU, Belke DD, Bluhm WF, et al. Overexpression of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2_)-ATPase improves myocardial contractility in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes. 2002, 51:1166-1171.
    44. Semeniuk LM, Kryski AJ, Severson DL, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function in diabetic db/db and transgenic db/db-hGLUT4 mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002,283:H976-H982.
    45. Friedman NE, Levitsky LL, Edidin DV, et al. Echocardiographic evidence for impaired myocardial performance in children with type I diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1982, 73:846-850.
    46. Mbanya JC, Sobngwi E, Mbanya DS, et al. Left ventricular mass and systolic function in African diabetic patients: association with microalbuminuria. Diabetes Metab. 2001,27:378-382.
    47. Vered A, Battler A, Segal P, et al. Exercise-induced left ventricular dysfunction
     in young men with asymptomatic diabetes mellitus (diabetic cardiomyopathy) . Am J Cardiol. 1984, 54:633-637.
    48. Baum VC, Levitsky LL, Englander RM, et al. Abnormal cardiac function after exercise in insulin-dependent diabetic children and adolescents. Diabetes Care. 1987, 10:319-323.
    49. Li SH, McNeill JH. In vivo effects of vanadium on GLUT4 translocation in cardiac tissue of STZ-diabetic rats. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001,217:121-129.
    50. Avogaro A, Vigili D, Kreutzenberg S, et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: a metabolic perspective. Am J Cardiol. 2004, 93:13A-16A.
    51. Petersen KF, Shulman GI. Pathogenesis of skeletal muscle insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2002,90:11G-18G.
    52. Petersen KF, Shulman GI. Cellular mechanism of insulin resistance in skeletal muscle. JRSocMed. 2002, 95:8-13.
    53. Trevisan R, Nosadini R, Avogaro A, et al. Type I diabetes is characterized by insulin resistance not only with regard to glucose, but also to lipid and amino acid metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986, 62:1155-1162.
    54. Stanley WC, Lopaschuk GD, McCormack JG. Regulation of energy substrate metabolism in the diabetic heart. Cardiovasc Res. 1997, 34:25-33.
    55. Mehrhof FB, Muller FU, Bergmann MW, et al. In cardiomyocyte hypoxia, insulin-like growth factor-I-induced antiapoptotic signaling requires phosphatidylinositol-3-OH-kinase-dependent and mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent activation of the transcription factor cAMP response element-binding protein. Circulation. 2001,104:2088-2094.
    56. Treasure CB, Vita JA, Cox DA, et al. Endothelium-dependent dilation of the coronary microvasculature is impaired in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1990,81:772-779.
    57. Nitenberg A, Valensi P, Sachs R, et al. Impairment of coronary vascular reserve and ACh-induced coronary vasodilation in diabetic patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries and normal left ventricular systolic function. Diabetes. 1993,42:1017-1025.
    58. Hasenfuss G. Alterations of calcium-regulatory proteins in heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 1998, 37:279-289.
    59. Smogorzewski M, Galfayan V, Massry SG. High glucose concentration causes a rise in [Ca2+]i of cardiac myocytes. Kidney Int. 1998, 53:1237-1243.
    60. Malhotra A, Sanghi V. Regulation of contractile proteins in diabetic heart. Cardiovasc Res. 1997, 34:34-40
    61. Hattori Y, Matsuda N, Kimura J, et al. Diminished function and expression of the cardiac Na+-Ca2+ exchanger in diabetic rats: implication in Ca2+ overload. J Physiol. 2000,527:85-94.
    62. Abe T, Ohga Y, Tabayashi N, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus model rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002, 282:H138-H148.
    63. Bidasee KR, Zhang Y, Shao CH, et al. Diabetes increases formation of advanced glycation end products on Sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase. Diabetes. 2004, 53:463-473.
    64. Singal PK, Bello-Klein A, Farahmand F, et al. Oxidative stress and functional deficit in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2001, 498:213-220.
    65. Cai L, Kang YJ. Oxidative stress and diabetic cardiomyopathy: a brief review. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2001, 1:181 -193.
    66. Liang Q, Carlson EC, Donthi RV, et al. Overexpression of metallothionein reduces diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes. 2002, 51:174-181.
    67. Ye G, Metreveli NS, Ren J, et al. Metallothionein prevents diabetes-induced deficits in cardiomyocytes by inhibiting reactive oxygen species production. Diabetes. 2003, 52:777-783.
    68. Ye G, Metreveli NS, Donthi RV, et al. Catalase protects cardiomyocyte function in models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004, 53:1336-1343.
    69. Cai L, Li W, Wang G, et al. Hyperglycemia-induced apoptosis in mouse myocardium: mitochondrial cytochrome C-mediated caspase-3 activation pathway. Diabetes. 2002, 51:1938-1948.
    70. Cai L, Kang YJ. Cell death and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc
     Toxicol. 2003, 3:219-228.
    71. Fiordaliso F, Leri A, Cesselli D, et al. Hyperglycemia activates p53 and p53-regulated genes leading to myocyte cell death. Diabetes. 2001,50:2363-2375.
    72. Fiordaliso F, Li B, Latini R, et al. Myocyte death in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats in angiotensin II- dependent. Lab Invest. 2000, 80:513-527.
    73. Tschope C, Walther T, Koniger J, et al. Prevention of cardiac fibrosis and left ventricular dysfunction in diabetic cardiomyopathy in rats by transgenic expression of the human tissue kallikrein gene. FASEB J. 2004, 18:828-835.
    74. Kawaguchi M, Techigawara M, Ishihata T, et al. A comparison of ultrastructural changes on endomyocardial biopsy specimens obtained from patients with diabetes mellitus with and without hypertension. Heart Vessels. 1997,12:267-274.
    75. Fang ZY, Prins JB, Marwick TH. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: evidence, mechanisms, and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev. 2004, 25:543-567.
    76. Chen S, Evans T, Mukherjee K, et al. Diabetes-induced myocardial structural changes: role of endothelin-1 and its receptors. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000,32:1621-1629.
    77. Hileeto D, Cukiernik M, Mukherjee S, et al. Contributions of endothelin-1 and sodium hydrogen exchanger-1 in the diabetic myocardium. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002,18:386-394.
    78. Janssen JA, Lamberts SW. The role of IGF-I in the development of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: is prevention possible? Eur J Endocrinol. 2002, 146:467-477.
    79. Kajstura J, Fiordaliso F, Andreoli AM, et al. IGF-1 overexpression inhibits the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy and angiotensin Il-mediated oxidative stress. Diabetes. 2001, 50:1414-1424.
    80. Norby FL, Aberle NS 2nd, Kajstura J, et al. Transgenic overexpression of insulin-like growth factor I prevents streptozotocin-induced cardiac contractile dysfunction and beta-adrenergic response in ventricular myocytes. J Endocrinol.
     2004, 180: 175-182.
    81. Danser AH, Chowdury S, de Lannoy LM, et al. Conversion and degradation of [125Ⅰ] labelled angiotensin I in isolated perfused porcine coronary and carotid arteries. Cardiovasc Res. 1995, 29: 789-795.
    82.龚兰生,施仲伟,于金德.充血性心力衰竭.2002,6:13.
    83.边延涛,王国宏,袁申元.氯沙坦对实验性糖尿病大鼠心肌的保护作用.中华心血管病杂志.2000,28:293-296.
    84. Chua CC, Hamdy RC, Chua BH. Regulation of thrombospondin-1 production by angiotensin Ⅱ in rat heart endothelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997, 1357: 209-214.
    85. McDonald KM, Garr M, Carlyle PF, et al. Relative effects of alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade, converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, and angiotensin Ⅱ subtype 1 receptor blockade on ventricular remodeling in the dog. Circulation. 1994, 90: 3034-3046.
    86. Sun Y, Zhang J, Zhang JQ, et al. Local angiotensin Ⅱ and transforming growth factor-betal in renal fibrosis of rats. Hypertension. 2000, 35: 1078-1084.
    87. Sun Y, Zhang JQ, Zhang J, et al. Angiotensin Ⅱ, transforming growth factor-betal and repair in the infracted heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998, 30: 1559-1569.
    88. Kawano H, Do YS, Kawano Y, et al. Angiotensin Ⅱ has multiple profibrotic effects in human cardiac fibroblasts. Circulation. 2000, 101: 1130-1137.
    89. Murphy-Ullrich JE, Poczatek M. Activation of latent TGF-beta by thrombospondin-1: mechanisms and physiology. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2000, 11: 59-69.
    90. Border WA, Noble NA. Transforming growth factor beta in tissue fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1994, 331: 1286-1292.
    91.雷红,熊世熙,曹萍.转化生长因子β1与糖尿病心肌病关系的研究.中国糖尿病杂志.2002,10:11-14.
    92. Lee AA, Dillmann WH, McCulloch AD, et al. Angiotensin Ⅱ stimulates the autocrine production of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in adult rat cardiac fibroblasts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995,27:2347-2357.
    93. Campbell SE, Katwa LC. Angiotensin II stimulated expression of transforming growth factor-betal in cardiac fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. J Mol Cell Cardiol.1997,29:1947-1958.
    94. Hoffman BB, Sharma K, Zhu Y, et al. Transcriptional activation of transforming growth factor-betal in mesangial cell culture by high glucose concentration. Kidney Int. 1998,54:1107-1116.
    95. Baenziger NL, Brodie GN, Majerus PW. A thrombin-sensitive protein of human platelet membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jan;68(1):240-3.
    96. Lawler J. The functions of thrombospondin-1 and-2. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000, 12:634-640.
    97. Asch AS, Silbiger S, Heimer E, et al. Thrombospondin sequence motif (CSVTCG) is responsible for CD36 binding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.1992, 182:1208-1217.
    98. Adams JC, Lawler J. Diverse mechanisms for cell attachment to platelet thrombospondin.J Cell Sci. 1993, 104:1061-1071.
    99. Gao AG, Frazier WA. Identification of a receptor candidate for the carboxyl-terminal cell binding domain of thrombospondins. J Biol Chem. 1994,269:29650-29657.
    100.Sid B, Sartelet H, Bellon G, et al. Thrombospondin 1: a multifunctional protein implicated in the regulation of tumor growth. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004,49:245-258.
    101.Hamano Y, Sugimoto H, Soubasakos MA, et al. Thrombospondin-1 associated with tumor microenvironment contributes to low-dose cyclophosphamide- mediated endothelial cell apoptosis and tumor growth suppression. Cancer Res.2004,64:1570-1574.
    102.Shimoni Y, Firek L, Severson D, et al. Short-term diabetes alters K+ currents in rat ventricular myocytes. Circ Res. 1994, 74:620-628.
    103.Volpert OV, Alani RM. Wiring the angiogenic switch: Ras, Myc, and Thrombospondin-1. Cancer Cell. 2003, 3:199-200.
    104.IrueIa-Arispe ML, Porter P, Bornstein P, et al. Thrombospondin-1, an inhibitor of angiogenesis, is regulated by progesterone in the human endometrium. J Clin Invest. 1996,97:403-412.
    105.Guo N, Templeton NS, A1-Barazi H, et al. Thrombospondin-1 promotes alpha3betal integrin-mediated adhesion and neurite-like outgrowth and inhibits proliferation of small cell lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2000, 60:457-466.
    106.Yevdokimova N, Wahab NA, Mason RM. Thrombospondin-1 is the key activator of TGF-betal in human mesangial cells exposed to high glucose. J Am Soc Nephrol.2001,12:703-712.
    107.Tada H, Isogai S. The fibronectin production is increased by thrombospondin via activation of TGF-beta in cultured human mesangial cells. Nephron. 1998, 79:38-43.
    108.Olson BA, Day JR, Laping NJ. Age-related expression of renal thrombospondin 1 mRNA in F344 rats: resemblance to diabetes-induced expression in obese Zucker rats. Pharmacology. 1999, 58:200-208.
    109.Yevdokimova NY. High glucose-induced alterations of extracellular matrix of human skin fibroblasts are not dependent on TSP-1-TGFbetal pathway. J Diabetes Complications. 2003, 17:355-364.
    110.Wang S, Shiva S, Poczatek MH, et al. Nitric oxide and cGMP-dependent protein kinase regulation of glucose-mediated thrombospondin 1-dependent transforming growth factor-beta activation in mesangial cells. J Biol Chem.2002,277:9880-9888.
    111.Wang S, Wu X, Lincoln TM, et al. Expression of constitutively active cGMP-dependent protein kinase prevents glucose stimulation of thrombospondin 1 expression and TGF-beta activity. Diabetes. 2003, 52:2144-2150.
    112.Naito T, Masaki T, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, et al. Angiotensin II induces thrombospondin-1 production in human mesangial cells via p38 MAPK and JNK: a mechanism for activation of latent TGF-betal. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004, 286:F278-287.
    113.Wrana JL, Attisano L, Wieser R, et al. Mechanism of activation of the TGF-beta
     receptor. Nature. 1994,370:341-347.
    114.Hong SW, Isono M, Chen S, et al. Increased glomerular and tubular expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1, its type II receptor, and activation of the Smad signaling pathway in the db/db mouse. Am J Pathol. 2001,158:1653-1663.
    115.Kim HW, Kim BC, Song CY, et al. Heterozygous mice for TGF-betallR gene are resistant to the progression of streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2004,66:1859-1865.
    116.Yang YL, Guh JY, Yang ML, et al. Interaction between high glucose and TGF-beta in cell cycle protein regulations in MDCK cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998,9:182-193.
    117.Chuang LY, Guh JY, Liu SF, et al. Regulation of type II transforming-growth-factor-beta receptors by protein kinase C iota. Biochem J. 2003, 375:385-393.
    118.Sekelsky JJ, Newfeld SJ, Raftery LA, et al. Genetic characterization and cloning of mothers against dpp, a gene required for decapentaplegic function in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995,139:1347-1358.
    119.Savage C, Das P, Finelli AL, et al. Caenorhabditis elegans genes sma-2, sma-3, and sma-4 define a conserved family of transforming growth factor beta pathway components. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan, 93:790-794.
    120.Derynck R, Gelbart WM, Harland RM, et al. Nomenclature: vertebrate mediators of TGFbeta family signals. Cell. 1996, 87:173.
    121.Heldin CH, Miyazono K, ten Dijke P. TGF-beta signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature. 1997, 390:465-471.
    122.Nakao A, Imamura T, Souchelnytskyi S, et al. TGF-beta receptor-mediated signalling through Smad2, Smad3 and Smad4. EMBO J. 1997,16:5353-5362.
    123.Miyazono K. TGF-beta signaling by Smad proteins. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2000,11:15-22.
    124.Flanders KC. Smad3 as a mediator of the fibrotic response. Int J Exp Pathol. 2004, 85:47-64.
    125.Guh JY, Chuang TD, Chen HC, et al. Beta-hydroxybutyrate-induced growth inhibition and collagen production in HK-2 cells are dependent on TGF-beta and Smad3. Kidney Int. 2003, 64:2041-2051.
    126.Fujimoto M, Maezawa Y, Yokote K, et al. Mice lacking Smad3 are protected against streptozotocin-induced diabetic glomerulopathy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 305:1002-1007.
    127.Li JH, Huang XR, Zhu HJ, et al. Advanced glycation end products activate Smad signaling via TGF-beta-dependent and independent mechanisms: implications for diabetic renal and vascular disease. FASEB J. 2004, 18:176-178.
    128.Isono M, Chen S, Hong SW, et al. Smad pathway is activated in the diabetic mouse kidney and Smad3 mediates TGF-beta-induced fibronectin in mesangial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002, 296:1356-1365.
    129.Martin J, Kelly DJ, Mifsud SA, et al. Tranilast attenuates cardiac matrix deposition in experimental diabetes: role of transforming growth factor-beta. Cardiovasc Res. 2005, 65:694-701.
    130.Lo RS, Massague J. Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of TGF-beta-activated smad2. Nat Cell Biol. 1999,1:472-478.
    131 .Schiffer M, Schiffer LE, Gupta A, et al. Inhibitory smads and tgf-Beta signaling in glomerular cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002,13:2657-2666.
    132.Venkatesan N, Pini L, Ludwig MS. Changes in Smad expression and subcellular localization in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004,287:L1342-1347.
    133.Chen R, Huang C, Morinelli TA, et al. Blockade of the effects of TGF-betal on mesangial cells by overexpression of Smad7. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002,13:887-893.
    134.Liao J, Kobayashi M, Kanamuru Y, et al. Effects of candesartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, on diabetic nephropathy in KK/Ta mice. J Nephrol. 2003, 16:841-849.
    135.Schnaper HW, Hayashida T, Poncelet AC. It's a Smad world: regulation of
     TGF-beta signaling in the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002, 13: 1126-1128.
    136. Wang W, Koka V, Lan HY. Transforming growth factor-beta and Smad signalling in kidney diseases. Nephrology (Carlton). 2005, 10: 48-56.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700