摘要
本文以垂直专业化和产品内贸易为研究对象,运用国际经济学中的理论方法,并辅以计量分析工具,从工序层面的国际分工和国际贸易入手,建立一个以产品内分工和贸易为特征的理论分析框架,并利用上述理论来分析全球价值链、全球贸易失衡以及中国对外贸易等问题。主要观点有:(1)垂直专业化是国际分工的最新发展阶段,国际外包是垂直专业化的具体表现形式,产品内贸易是垂直专业化的必然结果;(2)产品内贸易是由垂直专业化引起的中间投入品贸易,加工贸易是产品内贸易主要的表现形式,产品内贸易有利于发达国家和发展中国家福利的提高,也是国际贸易发展的必然趋势;(3)产品内贸易理论从垂直专业化的视角对标准国际贸易理论体系进行了整合和补充,将国际贸易理论的分析框架延伸到产品生产的工序和区段层面;(4)全球价值链是垂直专业化所展现的动态价值创造活动,垂直专业化的分析框架可以较好地解释全球价值链的形成原因、动力机制、治理模式、产业升级等问题;(5)由垂直专业化导致的国际生产转移和由产品内贸易导致的区域贸易网络是造成全球贸易失衡和中美贸易失衡的主要原因;(6)以加工贸易为主的中国产品内贸易可以部分解释中国对外贸易的快速增长和贸易顺差的大量累积,但中国的加工贸易面临着转型升级的挑战。
One of the prominent features in the second upsurge of economic globalization, which appeared in second half of the 20th century, is the international vertical specialization and the prevalent intra-product trade. The intra-product trade taken the form of processing trade promoted the rapid development of global trade including the East Asian region. As the latest changes of international specialization, the intra-product trade caused by vertical specialization was the most important variable to explain the significant growth of global trade since 1960s. However, the standard trade theory mostly focused on the final product, but not the international specialization of working procedure, which made the international trade theory lag behind the practice. Therefore, the research on the theory of vertical specialization and intra-product trade is helpful to both the development of international trade theory and the in-depth study on the other specific international economic issues.
In order to better understand the economic globalization and the development of international trade, to explore the existing limitations of international trade theory and possible improvements, but also to analyze the existing international economic issues with the use of the new theoretical framework, this paper will carry out a study on the vertical specialization and trade issues on the basis of existed research results, mainly from the following aspects: (1)From the perspective of the causes, patterns and effects of vertical specialization, analyzing its effects on international trade. (2) Analyzing the contents, modes, effects and the relationship between the intra-product trade and the other forms from the perspective of vertical specialization. (3)With the use of the analysis methods and framework of traditional trade theory and new trade theory, establish a system of concepts and a theoretical framework about intra-product trade from the perspective of vertical specialization. (4)Explain the global value chains, global trade imbalance and other practical issues with the use of theoretical framework of vertical specialization and intra-product. (5)This paper will have an analysis on China's foreign trade issues on the basis of vertical specialization and intra-product trade.
This paper run in accordance with the discussing sequence of "specialization theory then trade theory then specific problems", collect and absorb the existing research results, establish an analyzing framework including both specialization theory characterized by vertical specialization and trade theory characterized by intra-product trade, explain the global value chain and global trade imbalances, then test the theoretical and practical significances of this theoretical framework with taking China's foreign trade for an example, consequently, come to some significant conclusions.
Vertical specialization is the latest stage of the development of international division of labour, its major features are the integration of trade and investment promoted by multinational corporations. Vertical specialization framework renew the system of international division from the perspective of production process, intra-product trade is the inevitable result of vertical specialization, which countries to improve the welfare of both developed and developing countries. Through intra-product trade, on one hand, a country could embedded in the global value chains and achieve industrial upgrading, on the other hand, it could also create a negative impact on the country such as trade imbalances, Nevertheless, intra-product trade has become the new trade development trend.
Intra-product trade theory summarizes and supplements the international trade theory including the classical trade theory, the new classical trade theory, the new trade theory and the theory of industrial organization from the aspect of vertical specialization, pointing out that as long as one country own the comparative advantage, economies of scale, technological advantages, market monopoly or beneficial ownership arrangements in some processes or sections, it is possible to achieve cost savings and improve the efficiency of resource distribution and embed in the global value chain, ultimately, improve the country's national welfare. Intra-product trade theory answered some questions about the terms of trade, the direction of trade, the interest’s distribution of trade and other issues.
Global value chains (GVC) are the dynamic value creation activities through vertical specialization, which is the result of the integration of vertical specialization and Intra-product trade promoted by the multinational corporations. The vertical specialization explained the reasons, the dynamic mechanism, the governance mode and the industrial upgrading of the GVC. Both the transfer of international production and the regional trade network led by vertical specialization are the important reasons for the global trade imbalances. China’s huge trade surplus with USA is one of the most important parts of the global trade imbalances, the most fundamental reason of Sino-US merchandise trade surplus is the industrial upgrading along the global value chain and the transfer of East Asia industrial structure, as well as the large number of FDI in China.
China’s intra-product trade has a rapid growth in accordance with the method of input-output measurements, mainly taking the form of processing trade in the East Asian regional production networks. The processing trade mainly invested by FDI promotes China's terms of trade, the interests of trade and industrial competitiveness. The rapid growth of China's foreign trade and the large number of accumulated trade surplus mainly attribute to the intra-product trade which is in form of processing trade to a large extent. China's intra-product trade has had a positive economic effect, but the processing trade faced with the challenges of transformation and upgrading.
This paper develops the standard trade theory from the point of view of vertical specialization and intra-product trade, put the focus of standard trade theory onto process level on the basis of the persisting on the theory of comparative advantage, re-examine the traditional trade theory from a new perspective. At the same time, this paper analyzes the global value chain and global trade imbalances by using the theory about vertical specialization and intra-product trade. However, this research method still used the standard trade theory analysis tools to explain vertical specialization and intra-product trade, but not fundamentally changed international trade analysis, just adjusted from the different aspects. About the vertical specialization and the intra-product trade related to FDI, regional economic integration, enterprise organization mode and so on, as well as the participation of developing countries in vertical specialization still need an in-depth study.
In a word, this paper has a research on the FDI, international outsourcing, processing trade, industry clusters and the other international economic activities together by establishing an analysis framework on vertical specialization and intra-product trade. The study on the vertical specialization and intra-product trade contributes to the analysis and explanation the processing trade, the global trade imbalances, the global value chain and other issues in recent years. From China's view, the in-depth study on intra-product trade theory is helpful to solve the rapid growth of China's trade surplus, to use foreign direct investment rationally, to develop effective tariff rate, to set and achieve reasonable exchange rate level, to upgrade processing trade and carry out other external economic activities.
引文
6 见卢锋(2004):《产品内分工:一个分析框架》,中国经济研究中心讨论稿,第 39 页。
12 见段吉勇:“世界项目外包市场方兴未艾”,《经济参考报》,2002 年 7 月 22 日。
21 见贝蒂尔·俄林(2001):《地区间贸易与国际贸易》,首都经济贸易大学出版社,第 5 页。
析》,上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,第 49 页图 1-3 和图 1-4。
27 该模型参考了田文(2006):《产品内贸易论》,经济科学出版社,第 176 页。
28 [英]多纳德·海、德理克·莫瑞斯,2001:《产业经济学与组织》,经济科学出版社。
33见袁奇(2006):《当代国际分工格局下中国产业发展战略研究》,西南财经大学出版社,第 69 页。
39 参见 Markusen, James. R. Factor Movements and Commodity (1984), “Trade as Complements, Journal of International Economics”, 1983, 14, pp341-356 和 Sveasson, Lars E. O. 1984), “Factor Trade and Goods Trade”, International Economic Review, Vol16, pp.365-378.
40 参见[美]克鲁格曼著(2001):《国际贸易新理论》(黄胜强译),中国社会科学出版社,第 93-95页,第 141-144 页。
41参见[日]小岛清著(1984):《对外贸易论》,天津南开出版社,第 437-442 页。
42 参考了姚枝仲、何帆(2004):《外国直接投资是否带来国际收支危机》,《经济研究》第 11 期,第 39-41 页。
[1] [美]克鲁格曼著(2001):《国际贸易新理论》(黄胜强译),中国社会科学出版社。
[2] [美]迈克尔·波特著(1997):《竞争优势》(孙小悦译),华夏出版社。
[3] [美]迈克尔·波特著(2003):《竞争论》(高登第、李明轩译),中信出版社。
[4] [美]威廉姆森著(2002):《资本主义经济制度:论企业契约与市场契约》,商务印书馆。
[5] [英]多纳德·海、德理克·莫瑞斯著(2001):《产业经济学与组织》,经济科学出版社。
[6] [瑞典]贝蒂尔·俄林著(2001):《地区间贸易与国际贸易》,首都经济贸易大学出版社。
[7] [日]小岛清著(1984):《对外贸易论》,天津南开出版社。
[8] 盛洪著(1994):《分工与交易:一个一般及其对中国非专业化问题的应用分析》,上海三联书店、上海人民出版社。
[9] 金碚著(2003):《中国企业竞争力报告》,社科文献出版社。
[10] 袁奇著(2006):《当代国际分工格局下中国产业发展战略研究》,西南财经大学出版社。
[11] 邵祥林、王玉梁、任晓微著(2001):《未来国际贸易的主流:加工贸易》,对外经贸大学出版社。
[12] 张二震、马野青、方勇等著(2004):《贸易投资一体化与中国的战略》,人民出版社。
[13] 张幼文、金芳著(2004):《世界经济学》,立信会计出版社。
[14] 田文著(2006):《产品内贸易论》,经济科学出版社。
[15] 王厚双等编(2002):《各国贸易政策比较》,经济日报出版社。
[16] 吴敬琏著(2003):《当代中国经济改革》,上海远东出版社。
[17] 北京大学中国经济研究中心课题组(2005):《垂直专门化、产业内贸易与中美贸易关系》,中国经济研究中心讨论稿(No.C2005005)。
[18] 北京大学中国经济研究中心课题组(2006):《中国出口贸易中的垂直专门化与中美贸易》,《世界经济》第 5 期。
[19] 曹明福、李树民(2005):《全球价值链分工的利益来源——比较优势、规模优势和价格倾斜优势》,《中国工业经济》第 10 期。
[20] 曹明福、李树民(2006):《全球价值链分工——从国家比较优势到世界比较优势》,《世界经济研究》第 11 期。
[21] 陈文敬(2006):《解开逆差之谜——如何正确看待和处理中美贸易不平衡问题》,《国际贸易》第 3 期。
[22] 顾书桂(2003):《垂直分工与发展中国家的经济全球化——兼评东亚模式的局限性》,《南京大学学报》(社科版)第 2 期。
[23] 高越、高峰(2006):《产品内贸易与外商直接投资的关系》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第 8 期。
[24] 高越、高峰(2005):《垂直专业化分工及我国的分工地位》,《国际贸易问题》第 3 期。
[25] 高越(2006):《产品内分工与我国加工贸易的结构升级》,《对外经贸实务》第 2 期。
[26] 黄满盈(2006):《中国贸易条件实证分析(1981~2004)》,对外经济贸易大学博士论文。
[27] 海闻(1995):《国际贸易理论的新发展》,《经济研究》第 7 期。
[28] 洪银兴(1997):《从比较优势到竞争优势——兼论国际贸易的比较利益理论的缺陷》,《经济研究》第 6 期。
[29] 胡国恒(2006):《直接投资、外包与跨国生产网络的空间组织》,《河南大学学报》第 3 期。
[30] 胡昭玲(2006):《国际垂直专业化分工与贸易:研究综述》,《南开经济研究》第 5 期。
[31] 胡昭玲(2006):《国际垂直专业化对发展中国家的影响与启示》,《经济经纬》第 5 期。
[32] 胡昭玲(2007):《国际垂直专业化对中国工业竞争力的影响分析》,《财经研究》第 4 期。
[33] 胡昭玲(2007):《国际垂直专业化与贸易理论的相关拓展》,《经济评论》第 2 期。
[34] 金芳(2006):《产品内国际分工及其三维分析》,《世界经济研究》第 6 期。
[35] 金碚(2003):《企业竞争力测评的理论与方法》,《中国工业经济》第 3 期。
[36] 亢梅玲(2006):《中美贸易不平衡原因分析》,《世界经济研究》第 4 期。
[37] 李稻葵、李丹宁(2006):《中美贸易顺差:根本原因在哪里》,《国际经济评论》第 9-10 期。
[38] 李晓华(2005):《产业组织的垂直解体与网络化》,《中国工业经济》第 7 期。
[39] 李俊(2000):《论产业内贸易与企业内贸易的关系》,《经济评论》第 5 期。
[40] 李文(2006):《东亚地区产业转移与中美贸易逆差实证分析》,《时代金融》第5 期。
[41] 卢锋(2006):《中国的双顺差、日本经验及失衡调整》,《国际经济评论》第9-10 期。
[42] 卢锋(2006):《中国国际收支双顺差现象研究:对中国外汇储备突破万亿美元的理论思考》,《世界经济》第 11 期。
[43] 卢锋(2004):《产品内分工:一个分析框架》,中国经济研究中心讨论稿(No.C2004005)。
[44] 李鸿飞(2004):《我国国际收支‘双顺差’现象思考》,《国际贸易问题》第 6 期。
[45] 柳剑平、孙云华(2006):《垂直专业化分工与中国对东亚经济体的贸易逆差—兼及中国对美国贸易顺差的比较分析》,《世界经济研究》第 7 期。
[46] 刘志彪、刘晓昶(2001):《垂直专业化:经济全球化的贸易与生产模式》,《经济理论与经济管理》第 10 期。
[47] 刘志彪、刘晓昶(2001):《论跨国公司的垂直专业化发展趋势》,《江海学刊》第 4 期。
[48] 刘志彪、吴福象(2005):《全球化经济中的生产非一体化——基于江苏投入产出表的实证研究》,《中国工业经济》第 7 期。
[49] 林孝文、张炳光(2000):《值链分析:跨国公司对发展中东道国经济影响的深层透视》,《福州大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)第 2 期。
[50] 林毅夫、蔡昉、李周(1999):《比较优势与发展战略——对东亚奇迹的再解释》,《中国社会科学》第 5 期。
[51] 林毅夫、鞠建东、王勇(2003):《要素禀赋、专业化分工、贸易的理论与实证》,中国经济研究中心讨论稿(No.C2003033)。
[52] 林毅夫、李永军(2003):《比较优势、竞争优势与发展中国家的经济发展》,《管理世界》第 7 期。
[53] 梅丽霞(2005):《基于全球价值链视角的制造业集群升级研究》,华中科技大学博士论文。
[54] 苗迎春(2004):《对中美贸易不平衡问题的重新审视》,《同济大学学报》(社会科学版)第 15 卷第 4 期。
[55] 蒲华林、张捷(2006):《产品内分工与产品内贸易》,《国际贸易问题》第 11 期。
[56] 蒲华林、张捷(2007):《产品内分工与中美结构性贸易顺差》,《世界经济研究》第 2 期。
[57] 平新乔(2005):《产业内贸易理论与中美贸易关系》,《国际经济评论》第 9-10 期。
[58] 沈国兵(2005):《贸易统计差异与中美贸易平衡问题》,《经济研究》第 6 期。
[59] 沈国兵(2004):《美中贸易逆差与人民币汇率:实证研究》,《南开经济研究》第 6 期。
[60] 宿景祥(2003):《储蓄不足——美国经常帐户赤字的根源》,《国际贸易》第 9 期。
[61] 史明珠、王建华(2006):《对我国垂直专业化贸易影响因素的实证研究》,《国际商务》第 5 期。
[62] 佘雪锋(2007):《产品内分工视野下国际贸易理论研究综述》,《重庆科技学院学报》第 1 期。
[63] 盛文军、廖晓燕(2002):《垂直专业化贸易、公司内贸易与产业内贸易》,《世界经济》第 2 期。
[64] 田文(2004):《垂直贸易论——以垂直专业化为基础的贸易研究》,南京大学博士论文。
[65] 田文(2005):《产品内贸易的定义、计量及比较分析》,《财贸经济》第 5 期。
[66] 田文(2005):《产品内贸易模式的决定与利益分配研究》,《国际商务》第 5 期。
[67] 田文、刘厚俊(2006):《产品内分工下西方贸易理论的新发展》,《经济学动态》第 5 期。
[68] 王斌(2006):《产业均衡下的垂直化联合生产与外包》,中国经济研究中心讨论稿(No.C2006010)。
[69] 吴解生(2004):《中国的“制造业吸纳”与区位优势提升》,《上海大学学报》第 3 期。
[70] 吴福象(2005):《经济全球化中制造业垂直分离的研究》,《财经科学》第 3 期。
[71] 徐春艳(2004):《国际外包业务与中国制造业的发展》,对外经济贸易大学博士论文。
[72] 夏平(2007):《中国中间产品贸易分析——给予产品内国际分工视角》,对外经济贸易大学博士学位论文。
[73] 于蕾、沈桂龙(2003):《“世界工厂”与经济全球化下中国国际分工地位》,《世界经济研究》第 4 期。
[74] 杨小凯、张永生(2001):《新贸易理论、比较利益理论及其经验研究的新成果:文献综述》,《经济学季刊》第 1 卷第 1 期。
[75] 尹翔硕、王领(2004):《中美贸易不平衡中的东亚因素》,《亚太经济》第 1 期。
[76] 尹翔硕(2007):《试论技术进步与贸易失衡》,《世界经济研究》第 2 期。
[77] 余永定(2006):《全球经济不平衡、中国汇率政策和双顺差》,《国际金融评论》第 1 期。
[78] 余永定、覃东海(2006):《中国的双顺差:性质、根源和解决办法》,《世界经济》第 3 期。
[79] 姚枝仲、何帆(2004):《外国直接投资是否带来国际收支危机》,《经济研究》第 11 期。
[80] 赵放、冯晓玲(2006):《从内部经济失衡和产业转移看中美贸易失衡》,《世界经济与政治论坛》第 3 期。
[81] 赵文丁(2003):《新型国际分工格局下中国制造业的比较优势》,《中国工业经济》第 8 期。
[82] 张二震、安礼伟(2002):《国际分工新特点与我国参与国际分工的新思路》,《经济理论与经济管理》第 12 期。
[83] 张辉(2004):《全球价值链理论与我国产业发展研究》,《中国工业经济》第 5 期。
[84] 张辉(2004):《全球价值链下地方产业集群——以浙江平湖光机电产业为例》,《产业经济研究》第 6 期。
[85] 张辉(2006):《全球价值链动力机制与产业发展策略》,《中国工业经济》第 1 期。
[86] 张薇、陈仲常(2004):《中国国际收支顺差的代价与风险分析》,《经济问题探索》第 12 期。
[87] 张小蒂、孙景蔚(2006):《基于垂直专业化分工的中国产业国际竞争力分析》,《世界经济》第 5 期。
[88] 张幼文(2006):《要素流动与全球经济失衡的历史影响》,《国际经济评论》第 2 期。
[89] 张莹(2006):《产品内分工:文献综述》,《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》第 3 期。
[90] 钟伟(2003):《持续的双顺差有喜也有优》,《中国外汇管理》第 7 期。
[91] 邹薇(2002):《竞争力的源泉:从外生比较优势到内生比较优势》,《武汉大学学报》(社会科学报)第 1 期。
[92] Amighini, Alessia (2004), “China in the International Fragmentation of Production: Evidence from the ICT Industry”, the European Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol.2, n.2, pp.203-219.
[93] Antweiler, Werner and Daniel Trefler (2002), “Increasing Returns and All That: A View from Trade”, American Economic Review, Vol.92, pp.93-119.
[94] Arndt, Sven W. (1997), “Globalization and the Open Economy”, North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol.1, pp.71-79.
[95] Arndt, Sven W. (1998), “Globalization and the Gains from Trade”, In K. Jaeger and K. J. Koch, eds., “Trade, Growth and Economic Policy in Open Economies”, Springer-Verlag: New York.
[96] Arndt, Sven W. (1998), “Super-specialization and the Gains from Trade”, Contemporary Economic Policy XVI, pp.480-485.
[97] Arndt, Sven W. (1999), “Globalization and Economic Development”, Journal of International Trade&Economy Development, Vol.8, p3.
[98] Arndt, Sven W. (2000), “Preference Areas and Intra-product Specialization”, Claremont Colleges Working Papers.
[99] Arndt, Sven W. (2001), “Preference Areas and Intra-Product Specialization”, in C. C. Paraskevopoulos(ed.), “Globalization and Political Economy of Trade Policy”(Toronto APF Press).
[100] Ashok Deo Bardhan and Cynthia A. Kroll (2003), “The New Wave of Outsourcing”, Research Report, Fall.
[101] Antràs P. (2003), “Firms, Contracts and Trade Structure”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.118, pp.1375-1418.
[102] Antràs P.&E. Helpman (2004), “Global Sourcing”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.112, pp552-580.
[103] Antràs P. (2005), “Incomplete Contracts and the Product Cycle”, AmericanEconomic Review, NBER working paper No.9945.
[104] Balassa, B. (1965), “Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage”, Manchester School, Vol.33, pp.99-123.
[105] Balassa Bela (1967), “Trade Liberalization among Industrial Countries”, New York: McGraw-Hill.
[106] Brander, J.A. (1981), “Intra-Industry Trade in Identical Commodities”, Journal of International Economics.
[107] Cairncross, Frances (1997), “The death of distance: How the communication revolution will change our lives”, Harvard Business School Press.
[108] Campa, Jose and Goldberg, Linda (1997), “The Evolving External Orientation of Manufacturing Industries: Evidence from Four Countries”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, pp.53-81.
[109] Campa, Jose and Goldberg, Linda (2005), “Outsourcing in a Global Economy”, Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), pp.135-159.
[110] Chen Yongmin, Jota Ishikawa and Yu Zhihao (2004), “Trade Liberalization and Strategic Outsourcing”, Journal of International Economics, pp.419-436.
[111] Cheng Leonard and Henryk Kierzkowski ed (2001), “Globalization of Trade and Production in South-East Asia”, New York: Kluwer Academic Press.
[112] Coombs, R. & Battaglia, P. (1998), “Outsourcing of Business Services and the Boundaries of the Firm”, CRIC Working Paper, The University of Manchester, No.5.
[113] Davis, D. R. (1995), “Intra-Industry Trade: A Hecksher-Olin-Ricardo Approach.” Journal of International Economics, 39, pp.201-226.
[114] Davis, D. R. and Weinstein, D. E. (2000), “International Trade as an ‘Integrated Equilibrium’:New Perspective”, American Economic Review, 90(2), pp.150-154.
[115] Davis, D. R. and Weinstein, D. E. (2001a), “An Account of Global Factor Trade”, American Economic Review, 91(5), pp.1423-1453.
[116] Davis, D. R. and Weinstein, D. E. (2001b), “The Factor Content of Trade”, NBER Working Paper, No. 8637.
[117] Deardorff, V. Alan (1998), “Fragmentation across Cones”, RISE Discussion Paper, No.427.
[118] Deardorff, V. Alan (2001), “Fragmentation in Simple Trade Models”, North American Journal of Economics and Finance, pp.121-137.
[119] Deardorff, V. Alan (2005), “Gains from Trade and Fragmentation”, Paper Prepared for CESifo Workshop Presentation.
[120] Dixit and Stiglitz (1977), “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity”, American Economic Review.
[121] Dixit, Avinash K. and Gene M. Grossman (1982), “Trade and Protection with Multistage Production”, Review of Economic Studies, pp.583-594.
[122] Dixit, Avinash K. and Gene M. Grossman (1999), “Productivity Measurement and the Impact of Trade and Technology on Wages: Estimates for the US 1972-1990”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp.907-940.
[123] Dixit, Avinash K. and Gene M. Grossman (2003), “Global Production Sharing and Rising Inequality: A Survey of Trade and Wages”, in Handbook of International Trade, Oxford Basil-Blackwell, pp.146-185.
[124] Dicken P. (1998), “Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy”(Third Edition), Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
[125] Dicken P. and Henderson (1999), “Making the Connections Global Production Networks in Britain, East Asia and Eastern Europe”, A research proposal to the Economic and Social Research Council.
[126] Dicken P., Kelly P. Olds K. and Yeung H. W. (2001), “Chains and Networks, Territories and Scales: Toward a Relational Framework for Analyzing the Global Economy”, Global Networks.
[127] Dolan C. and J. Humphrey (2000), “Value Chains and Upgrading: The Impact of UK Retailers on the Fresh Fruit and Vegetables Industry in Africa”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol.37, No.2, 147-176.
[128] Elhanan Helpman, Marc J. Melitz and Stephen R. Yeaple (2003), “Export versus FDI with Heterogenous Firms”, American Economic Review, Vol.94, No.1, pp.290-315.
[129] Ethier, Wilfred J. (1982), “National and International Return to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade”, The American Economic Review, 72, pp.389 -405.
[130] Ernst, D. (1999), “Globalization and the Changing Geography of Innovation Systems: A Policy Perspective on Global Production Networks”, Paper presented at the International Workshop: The Political Economy of Technology in Developing Countries Brighton, October 8-9.
[131] Ernst D. (2000), “Inter-Organization Knowledge Outsourcing: What Permits SmallTaiwanese Firms to Compete in the Computer Industry”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.
[132] Ernst, D. and Linsu Kim (2002), “Global Production Net-works, Knowledge Diffusion and Local Capability Formation”, Research Policy, p31.
[133] Feenstra, Robert C and Gordon H. Hanson (1996), “Globalization Outsourcing and Wage Inequality”, American Economic Review, pp.240-245.
[134] Feenstra, Robert C. and Gordon H. Hanson (1997), “Productivity Measurement and the Impact of Trade and Technology on Wages: Estimates for the US 1972-1990”, NBER Working Paper, No.6052, June.
[135] Feenstra, Robert C. (1998), “Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in Global Economy”, Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol.12, No 4, Fall, pp.31-50.
[136] Feenstra R.C. and G.H. Hanson (1999), “The Impact of Outsourcing and High-technology Capital on Wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979-1990”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.3, pp.907-940.
[137] Feenstra, Robert C. Gordon H. Hanson and Deborah L. Swenson (2000), “Offshore Assembly from the United States”, in Robert Feenstra ed, The Impact of International Trade on Wages, NBER and University of Chicago Press, pp.85-122.
[138] Feensta R.C.&G.H. Hanson (2003), “Ownership and Control in Outsourcing to China”, University of California and NBER, March.
[139] Feenstra R.C. (2003), “Ownership and Control in Outsourcing to China”, NBER Working Paper, No.10198.
[140] Feenstra R.C. and B.J. Spencer (2005), “Contractual versus Generic Outsourcing:The Role of Proximity”, University of British Columbia, mimeo.
[141] Findlay, Ronald (1978), “An Austrian Model of International Trade and Interest Rate Equalization”, Journal of Political Economy, pp.989-1008.
[142] Finger, J. M. (1975): “Tariff Provisions for Offshore Assembly and the Exports of Developing Countries”, The Economic Journal, Vol.85, Issue 338, pp.365-371.
[143] Finlay, R. and R.W. Jones (2001), “Input Trade and the Location of Production”, the American Economic Review, 91(2).
[144] Ng, F. and Alexander Yeats (1999), “Production Sharing in East Asia: Who Does What for Whom and Why?” World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper, No.2197.
[145] Francoise Lemoine, Denizunal-Kesenci (2002), “China in the InternationalSegmentation of Production Processes”, CEPII No.2002-02.
[146] Frobel, F., Heinrichs J., and Kreye, O. (1978), “The New International Division of Labour”, Social Science Information, 17(1), pp.123–42.
[147] Fung, K.C. and Lawrence Lau (1996), “The China-United States Bilateral Trade Balance: How Big Is It Really?” Asia/Pacific Research Center, Institute for International Studies, Stanford University.
[148] Fung, K.C. and L.J. Lau (2001), “New Estimates of U. S.-China Bilateral Trade Balances,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol.15, pp.102- 130.
[149] Fung, K.C. and L.J. Lau (2003), “Adjusted Estimates of United States-China Bilateral Trade Balances: 1995-2002”, Journal of Asian Economics, Vol.14, pp.489- 496.
[150] Galvin P., Morkel A. (2001), “The Effect of Product Modularity on Industry Structure: the Case of the World Bicycle Industry”, Industry and Innovation, 8(1):31-47.
[151] Ge, Wei (1999), “The Dynamics of Export-processing Zones”, UNCTAD Discussion Paper, p.144.
[152] Francoise Lemoine, Deniz Unal-Kesenci (2004), “Assembly Trade and Technology Transfer :the Case of China”, World Development.
[153] Gereffi, G. (1994), “The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How U.S. Retailers Shape Oversea Production Networks”, in G. Gereffi and M. Korzeniewicz ed: Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, London: Praeger.
[154] Gereffi G. (1995), “Global Production Systems and Third World Development”, B. Stallings(ed.), Global Change, Regional Response, New York: Cambridge University Press.
[155] Gereffi G., Lynn H. (1996), “Latin American in the Global Economy: Running Faster to Stay in Place”, NACLA’s Report on Americas.
[156] Gereffi G. (1999), “International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chains”, Journal of International Economics, Vol.48, pp.37-70.
[157] Gereffi G. (1999), “A Commodity Chains Framework for Analyzing Global Industries”, Working Paper for IDS.
[158] Gereffi G. (2001), “Beyond the Producer-driven/Buyer-driven Dichotomy: the Evolution of Global Value Chains in the-Internet Era”, IDS Bulletin.
[159] Gereffi G. (2001), “Shifting Governance Structures in Global Commodity Chains, with Special Reference to the Internet”, American Behavior Scientist.
[160] Gereffi G. (2003), “The Global Apparel Value Chain: What Prospects for Upgrading by Developing Countries”, Austria: UNIDO.
[161] Gereffi Gary (2003), “Humphrey John, Sturgeon Timothy. The Governance of Global Value Chains: An Analytic Framework”, Review of International Political Economy.
[162] Glass Amy and Kamal Saggi (2001), “Innovation and Wage Effects on International Outsourcing”, European Economic Review, Vol.45, pp.67-86.
[163] Grossman, Sanford J., and Hart, Oliver D. (1986), “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership:A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.94, p.691-719.
[164] Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E. (1995), “Technology and Trade”, in Handbook of International Economics, Vol.3, Grossman, G.M. and Rogoff, eds. Amsterdam: North Holland.
[165] Grossman G. M. and Helpman E. (2002), “Integration Versus Outsourcing in Industry Equilibrium”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.117, pp.85-120.
[166] Grossman G. M. and Helpman E. (2002), “Outsourcing versus FDI in Industry Equilibrium”, Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol.1, (2-3):317-327.
[167] Grossman G. M. and Helpman E. (2003): “Outsourcing versus FDI in Industry Equilibrium”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, pp.317-327.
[168] Grossman, G.M. and E.Helpman (2004), “Managerial Incentives and the International Organization of Production”, Journal of International Economics, 63:237-262.
[169] Grossman G.M. and E. Helpman (2005), “Outsourcing in A Global Economy”, Review of Economic Studies, 72, pp.135-160.
[170] Grubel, H.G. and Llyod, P.J. (1975), “Intra-industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products”, Macmillan.
[171] Hanson, G. H., Raymond J., Mataloni, J., Slaughter, M. J. (2002), “Vertical Specialization in Multinational Firms”, NBER working paper.
[172] Hanson G.H. and M.J. Slaughter (2004), “Vertical Production Networks in Multinational Firms”, NBER working paper, Feb.
[173] Helpman, P.R. (1981), “International Trade in the Presence of ProductDifferentiation, Economies of Scale and Monopolistic Competition: A Chamberlin- Hechscher- Ohlin Approach”, Journal of International Economics, 11, pp.305-340.
[174] Helleiner, G. K. (1973), “Manufactured Exports from Less-developed Countries and Multinational Firms” The Economic Journal, Vol. 83, Issue 329, pp.21-47.
[175] Henderson, J. (1998), “Danger and Opportunity in the Asia-Pacific”, in Thompson, G (eds), Economic dynamism in the Asia-Pacific, London: Routledge, pp.356-384.
[176] Head Keith, John Ries (2000), “Offshore Production and Skill Upgrading by Japanese Manufacturing Firms”, mimeo, University of British Columbia.
[177] Head Keith, John Ries and Barbara I Spencer (2004), “Vertical Network and U.S. Auto Parts Exports Is Japan Different?” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 13(1):37-67.
[178] Hsieh, Chang-Tai and Keong T. Woo (1999), “The Impact of Outsourcing to China on Hong Kong’s Labor Market”, mimeo, Princeton University.
[179] Hummels David, Dana Rapoport and Kei-Mu Yi (1998), “Vertical Specialization and the Changing Nature of World Trade”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, Vol.4, pp.79-99.
[180] Hummels D., Jun Ishii, Kei-Mu Yi (2001), “The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade”, Journal of International Economics, Vol.54, Issue 1, pp.75-96.
[181] Humphrey J. and H. Schmitz (2000), “Governance and Upgrading:Linking Industrial Cluster and Global Value Chain Research”, IDS Working Paper, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
[182] Humphrey J. and H. Schmitz (2001), “Governance in Global Value chains”, IDS Bulletin Vol.32, No.3.
[183] Humphrey J. and Schmitz H. (2003), “Governance in Global Value Chains”, In Hubert Schmitz(ed), Local Enterprises in the Global Economy: Issues of Governance and Upgrading, p.126.
[184] Ishii Jun and Kei-Mu Yi (1997), “The Growth of World Trade”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research Paper, No.9718.
[185] Ingo Geishecker and Holger Gorg (2004), “International Outsourcing and Wages: Winners and Losers”, http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/staff/ details/holger_gorg.html.
[186] Jabbour, Liza and Jean-LouisMucchiell (2004), “Technology Spillovers throughBackward Linkages: The Case of the Spanish Manufacturing Industry”, Cahiers de laMSE, 73.
[187] Jabbour, Liza (2005), “Determinants of International Vertical Specialization and Implications on Technology Spillovers”, presented at the 4th EUROPAEUM Economic Workshop, University of Bologna.
[188] Jarillo J. Carlos (1988), “On Strategic Networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.9, pp.31-41.
[189] Jones, Ronald W. and Kierzkowski, Henryk (1990), “The role of Services in Production and International Trade: A Theoretical Framework”, In Jones, Ronald W. and Krueger, Anne O. (ed.) The Political Economy of International Trade: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Baldwin, Basil Blackwell, pp.31-48.
[190] Jones R.W. (2000), “Globalization and the Theory of Input Trade”. MIT Press.
[191] Jones R.W. and H. Kierzkowski (2000), “Globalization and the Consequences of International Fragmentation”, In R. Dornbusch ed, Money, Factor and Trade, The MIT Press.
[192] Jones Ronald W. and Henryk Kierzkowski (2001), “Horizontal Aspects of Vertical Fragmentation”, in Leonard K. Cheng and Henryk Kierzkowski, (ed), Global Production and Trade in East Asia Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.33-51.
[193] Jones Ronald W. and Henryk Kierzkowski (2001), “A Framework for Fragmentation” in Arndt Sven W. and Henryk Kierkowski ed. Fragmentation New Production Patterns in the World Economy, Oxford University Press, pp.17-34.
[194] Jones Ronald, Henryk Kierzkowski (2003), “International Fragmentation and the New Geography”, EIAS Working Paper.
[195] Jones Ronald, Henryk Kierzkowski, Chen Lu-rong (2004), “What Does Evidence Tell Us about Fragmentation and Outsourcing”, HEI Working Paper, Vol.8.
[196] Kaplinsky R. (2000), “Spreading the Gains from Globalization: What can be Learned from Value Chain Analysis?” Journal of Development Studies, Vol.37, No.2, pp.117-146.
[197] Kaplinsky, R, Morris, M. A. (2002), “A Handbook for Value Chain Research”, Paper for IDRC.
[198] Katz, Lawrence F. and Kevin M. Murphy (1992), “Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.107,pp.35-78.
[199] Kogut.B. (1985), “Designing Global Strategies: Comparative and Competitive Value-added Chains”, Sloan Management Review, 26(4).
[200] Kohler, Willem (2002), “Aspects of International Fragmentation Economics”, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
[201] Kohler, Willem (2003), “The Distribution Effects of International Fragmentation”, American Economic Review, Vol.4, pp.89-120.
[202] Krugman P.R. (1979), “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade”, Journal of International Economics.
[203] Krugman, P.R. and Venables, A. (1990), “Integration and the Competitiveness of Peripheral Industry”, In C. Bliss and J. Braga de Macedo (eds.), Unity with Diversity in the European Community, Cambridge University Press.
[204] Krugman, P., (1995), “Development, Geography, and Economic Theory”, MIT press.
[205] Lancaster, K. (1980), “Intra-industry Trade Under Perfect Monopolistic Competition”; Journal of International Economics.
[206] Lara Rivero Arturo A. (2002), “Packard Electric/Delphi and the Birth of the Auto-part Cluster: The Case of Chihuahua Mexico”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol.26-4, pp.785-98.
[207] Lardy N.R. (1994), “China in the World Economy”, Institute for International Economies.
[208] Lee, J-R. and Chen, J.-S (2000), “Dynamic Synergy Creation with Multiple Business Activities: Toward a Competence-based Growth Model for Contract Manufacturers”, Theory Development for Competence-Based Management, Advances in Applied Business Strategy.
[209] Luiza Bazan, Lizbeth Navas-Aleman (2003), “Upgrading in Global and National Value Chains: Recent Challenges and Opportunities for the Sinos Valley Footwear Cluster, Brazil”, Novara.
[210] Luthje Boy (2002), “Electronics Contract Manufacturing: Global Production and the International Division of Labor in the Age of Internet”, Industry and Innovation, Vol.3.
[211] Levchenko A. (2004), “Institutional Quality and International Trade”, IMF workingpaper.
[212] Lynch, T. ( 1998), “Leaving Home: Three Decades of Internationalization by U.S.Automotive Firms”, IPC Working Paper, pp.98-107, Cambridge, MA: MIT Industrial Performance Center.
[213] Marc Melitz (2003), “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations on Aggregate Industry Productivity”, Econometrica, Vol.71, No.6, 1695-1725.
[214] Mahnke, V., (2002), “The Process of Vertical Disintegration: an Evolutionary Perspective on Outsourcing”, Journal of Management and Governance, No.1.
[215] Markusen, James. R. (1983), “Factor Movements and Commodity Trade as Complements”, Journal of International Economics, 14, pp341-356.
[216] Markusen, James R. and Anthony J. Venables, (1995), “Multinational Firms and The New Trade Theory”, NBER Working Paper, No.5036.
[217] Markusen, James R. and Anthony J. Venables, (1996a), “Multinational Production Skilled Labor and Real Wages”, NBER Working Paper, No.5483.
[218] Markusen,James R. and Anthony J. Venables (1996b), “The Theory of Endowment, Intra-industry and Multinational Trade”, NBER Working Paper , No.5529.
[219] Markusen, James R., and Anthony J. Venables (1998), “Multinational Firms and the New Trade Theory”, Journal of International Economics, 46, 183-203(998).
[220] Markusen, James R. (2002), “Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade”, Cambridge: MIT Press.
[221] Marin, D. and T. Verdier (2003), “Globalization and the Improvement of Talent”, Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No.4129.
[222] Marin, D. and T. Verdier (2005), “Corporate Hierarchies and International Trade”, University of Munich, mimeo.
[223] Mathews, John and Dong-Sung Cho (2000), “Tiger Technology: The Creation of a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia”, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.
[224] Melaren John (2000), “Globalization and Vertical Structure”, American Economic Review, Vol.90, pp.1239-1254.
[225] Messner D, Meyer-Stamer J. (2000), “Governance and Networks: Tools to Study the Dynamics of Clusters and Global Value Chains”, Paper for the IDS/INEF Project “The Impact of Global and Local Governance on Industrial Upgrading”, 25.
[226] Mundell (1957), “International Trade and Factor Mobility”. American Economic Review, 47(3): 321-335.
[227] Nadvi, K. (1999), “The Cutting Edge: Collective Efficiency and International Competitiveness in Pakistan”, Oxford Development Studies, 27(17), pp.81-107.
[228] Nadvi K, Halder G. (2005), “Local Clusters in Global Value Chains: Exploring Dynamic Linkage Between Germany and Pakistan”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17(5):339-363.
[229] Ng, Francis and Alexander Yeats (2003), “Major East Asian Trade Patterns: What Are the Implications for Regional Cooperation and Growth?” World Bank Policy Research Paper, No.3084, Washington D.C.
[230] Norman, Venables (1995), “International Trade, Factor Mobility, and Trade Costs”, the Economic Journal.
[231] Nunn, N. (2005), “Relationship—Specificity, Incomplete Contracts and the Pattern of Trade”, Department of Economics & Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto, mimeo.
[232] OECD (2000):“A Policy Brief:Science, Technology and Innovation in the new economy”, in OECD Observer, September.
[233] OECD (2002), “Intra-industry and Intra-firm Trade and the Internationalization of Production”, OECD Economic Outlook, Vol.71.
[234] Pack, Howard and Kamal Saggi (2001), “Vertical Technology Transfer via International Outsourcing”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol.65, pp. 389-415.
[235] Patrie A. (1994), “The Regional Clustering of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade”, Transnational Corperation, DEC.
[236] Porter, M.E. (1985), “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”, Free Press, New York.
[237] Porter, M. E. (1990), “Competitive Advantage of Nations”, New York, the Free Press.
[238] Powell, B. (1990), “Flaunting it, Japan style”, Newsweek, 116, pp.46-47.
[239] Puga, D. and D. Trefler (2002), “Knowledge Creation and Control in Organization”, NBER working paper, No.9121.
[240] Qiu, Larry D. and Barbara J. Spencer (2002), “Keiretsu and Relationship Specific Investments Implications for Market-Opening Policy”, Journal of International Economics, Vol.58, pp.49-79.
[241] Raikes P, Jensen M, Ponte S. (2000), “Global Commodity Chain Analysis and theFrench filière Approach: Comparison and Critique”, Economy & Society, August, 29(3):390-417.
[242] Sanyal Kalyan K. and Ronald W. Jones (1982), “The Theory of Trade in Middle Products”, American Economic Review, Vol.72, Issue.1, pp.16-31.
[243] Schmitz H. (1995), “Small Shoemakers and Fordist Giant: Tale of a Super Cluster”, World Development, Vol.23, No.1, pp.9- 28.
[244] Schmitz H. and Knorringa, P. (1999), “Learning from Global Buyers”, IDS Working Paper, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
[245] Sit, Victor F. S. (1988): “China’s Export-oriented Open Areas: The export Procession Zone Concept”, Asian Survey, Vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 661-675.
[246] Spencer, Barbara J. and Larry Qiu (2001), “Relationship Specific Investments: A Barrier to Trade?” International Economic Review, Vol.42, Issue 4, pp.871-901.
[247] Spencer B.J. (2005), “International Outsourcing and Incomplete Contracts”, NBER working paper, pp.11-18.
[248] Spence, (1976), “Product Selection, Fixed Costs, and Monopolistic Competition”, Review of Economic Studies.
[249] Sturgeon, Timothy J. (2002), “Modular Production Networks: A New American Model of Industrial Organization”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 451-496.
[250] Sveasson, Lars E. O.(1984), “Factor Trade and Goods Trade”, International Economic Review, Vol16, pp.365-378.
[251] USITC (1996), “Production sharing: Use of U.S. components and Materials in Foreign Assembly Operations, 1991-1994”, USITC Publication 2966, May.
[252] USITC (1999), “Production Sharing: Use of U.S. Components and Materials in Foreign Assembly Operations, 1995-1998”, USITC Publication 3256, December.
[253] UNCTAD (1999), “World Investment Report: Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Development”, p.1, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
[254] UNCTAD (2002a): “Trade and Development Report, 2002”, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
[255] UNCTAD (2002b): “World Investment Report 2002: Transnational Corporations and Export Competitiveness”, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
[256] UNCTAD (2002c), “NCTAD Handbook of Statistics 2002”, New York: United Nations.
[257] Yeats Alexander J. (2001), “Just How Big is Global Production Sharing”, in Sven W. Arndt and Henryk Kierzkowski ed, Fragmentation New Production Patterns in the World Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.108-143.
[258] Francis and Alexander Yeats (2003), “Major Trade Trends in East Asia: What are Their Regional Cooperation and Growth?” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3084.
[259] Yi, Kei-Mu (2003), “Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?” Journal of Political Economy, Vol.111, No.1.