欠发达地区资源消耗、环境污染与经济发展耦合关系比较研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着经济发展水平的提高,经济活动对自然界的干扰强度也在不断加强,随之而来的是世界范围内的资源短缺、环境污染和生态破坏问题的不断加剧。在此背景之下,人类越来越关注经济发展过程中产生的各种资源与环境问题,经济发展与环境关系的研究也逐渐成为了学术界的研究热点。现有研究得出的一致结论是:传统的线性发展模式造成了今天环境资源问题不断加剧的形势,但对两者之间的关系曲线、曲线的演变趋势及其原因,学术界还存在很大争议。欠发达地区经济发展水平低下,目前正处于工业化和城市化的前期或者中期阶段,且经济发展方式粗放,生态环境较为脆弱,面临着经济发展与资源节约和环境保护的双重压力。因此,欠发达地区经济发展与环境关系的研究对于该地区转变经济发展模式、制定可持续发展政策具有一定的理论和实践意义。
     本研究以地处西北欠发达地区的甘肃中部(兰州、白银、临夏、定西和甘南)为研究区域,首先,对各研究区经济发展与资源消耗、环境污染之间在时间尺度上的耦合路径进行分析,阐释了前者与后两者之间的耦合机制;并通过对各地区耦合关系进行横向空间比较,揭示了耦合关系的空间分异特点。第二,通过比较各地区传统全要素生产率、仅考虑自然资源和综合考虑环境资源要素条件下的全要素生产率的变化情况,定量分析了资源投入和环境污染要素对经济产出效率的影响程度。第三,对影响研究区资源消耗和环境污染的重要社会经济驱动力因素进行辨识,并定量分析了这些因素的影响程度。最后,在以上实证分析的基础上,提出了研究区资源-环境-经济耦合系统实现可持续发展的政策建议。本研究的具体工作内容总结如下:
     (1)本研究利用Johansen协整检验模型,分别验证分析了各研究区能源消耗-空气污染-经济发展、水资源消耗-水污染-经济发展和环境负荷-环境污染-经济发展变量系统中各指标变量之间是否存在长期稳定的均衡关系。在此基础上,运用广义脉冲响应模型和广义预测方差分解模型,分析了经济发展与能源消耗和空气污染、经济发展与水资源消耗和水污染以及经济发展与环境总负荷和环境总污染之间的冲击响应关系轨迹,研究阐释了耦合作用机制。并通过对不同研究区的耦合作用关系进行空间横向比较,总结了耦合作用关系的空间分异特征。
     (2)基于DEA的Malmquist指数分析模型,通过比较全要素生产率在不同条件下(传统经济学分析框架、仅考虑自然资源投入条件下和综合考虑资源投入和环境污染条件下)的变化情况,定量分析自然资源(能源投入、水资源投入和总资源投入)投入和环境污染(空气污染、水污染和总环境污染)要素对经济系统产出效率的影响程度。
     (3)利用STIRPAT模型,采用偏最小二乘法,对各研究区资源消耗、环境污染变化的重要社会经济驱动力要素进行辨识,并分析了各驱动力要素对资源消耗和环境污染的影响程度。
     (4)基于以上实证分析结论,提出了研究区实现可持续发展的政策建议。
As the economy develops, the worldwide problems of resource shortage, environmental pollution and ecological degradation are getting worse due to the increasing disturbance of economic activities on natural system. In this context, human concerns about various environmental problems during the economic process. So the studies on the relationship between economic development and resource consumption, environmental pollution became the focus of related scientific fields. Current studies agree that the traditional "linear model of economic production" leads to the present situation of aggravating resource and environmental problems, but as to the relationship-curve, evolution of relationship and its driving factors, there are many controversial views. With a low level of economic development, an extensive economic development mode and fragile environment, under-developed area, which is at the early or medium stage of industrialization and urbanization, faces the dual pressure of economic development and environmental protection. Therefore, the studies on economic development and environment have profound practical and theoretical significance for under-developed area in switching the economic development model and making sustainable development policy.
     This thesis takes the Central Gansu province (includes Lanzhou City, Baiyin City, Linxai Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Dingxi City, and Ganan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture), an under-developed area in Northwest of China, as the research area. First, the thesis analyzed the temporal coupling path between resource consumption, environmental pollution and economic development, to elucidate the coupling mechanism. Then the characters of spatial distribution of the coupled relationship have been unveiled by comparing the coupled relationship in different research area. Secondly, the thesis evaluated the impacts of resource input and environmental pollution factors on the economic efficiency by comparing the variation of Total Factor Productivity (TFP) under the different conditions. Third, the main social-economic driving factors of resource consumption and environmental pollution have been identified, and the impacts of driving factors have been evaluated as well. At the end of the thesis, based on the previous analytical results, the policies for sustainable development of coupled resource-environmental-economic system have been proposed. The content of this thesis are summarized as following:
     (1) The thesis applied Johansen co-integration test model to verify if there is a stable long-term equilibrium relationship between the indicator of resource consumption, environmental pollution and economic development in various variable system which includes Energy-Environmental-Economic, Water-Environmental-Economic, and Environmental Load-Environmental Pollution-Economic variable system. Subsequently, by adopting Generalized Impulse Response and Variance Decomposition model, the thesis respectively analyzed the two-way impulse-response relationship between energy consumption, air pollution and economic development; water consumption, water pollution and economic development; total resource consumption, total pollution and economic development. Then the characters of spatial distribution of the coupled relationship have been unveiled by comparing the coupled relationship in various research areas.
     (2) Using the DEA-Malmquist index model, the thesis evaluated the impacts of natural resource input (energy, water and total inputs) on economic efficiency through comparing variation of Total Factor Productivity (TFP) under different conditions.
     (3) The thesis applied STIRPAT and partial Least Square (PLS) to indentify the main social-economic driving factors which influent resource consumption and environmental pollution significantly in research area. And the impacts of the driving factors on resource consumption and environmental pollution have been evaluated subsequently.
     (4) Based on the previous analytical results, the thesis proposed some policy suggestions for sustainable development of coupled resource, environmental, economic system in central Gansu Province.
引文
Acaravci, A. and I. Ozturk. On the relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Europe[J]. Energy.2010,35(12):5412-5420.
    A. Hussein. Principles of Environmental Economics [M], Rout ledge (UK),2003.
    Anson, S. and K. Turner. Rebound and disinvestment effects in refined oil consumption and supply resulting from an increase in energy efficiency in the Scottish commercial transport sector[J]. Energy Policy.2009:37(9):3608-3620.
    Azomahou, T., F. Laisney, et al. Economic development and CO2 emissions:A nonparametric panel approach[J]. Journal of Public Economics.2006:90(6-7):1347-1363.
    Barbier, E.B. Natural Resources and Economic Development[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005.
    World Bank. World Development Indicators[R]. Washington, DC:The World Bank,2008B.
    Barbier, E. B. Poverty, development, and environment[J]. Environment and Development Economics.2010,15:635-660.
    Barrett, C. B., T. Reardon, et al. Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa:concepts, dynamics, and policy implications[J]. Food Policy.2001, 26(4):315-331.
    Beckerman, W., Economic growth and the environment:whose growth? Whose environment?[J]. World Development,1992,20:481-496.
    Bhattarai, M. and M. Hammig. Institutions and the environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation:A crosscountry analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia[J]. World Development.2001,29(6):995-1010.
    Bimonte, S.. Information access, income distribution, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics.2002,41(1):145-156.
    B.Mcssili, M.Grosjean, et al. From Nature-dominated to Human-dominated Environmental Changes [A]. IGU Bulletin,2002,50(1):23-38.
    B.Newella, C.Crumleyb, N. Hassanc, et al. A Conceptual Template for Integrative Human-environment Research [J]. Global Environmental Change.2005,15:299-307.
    Bosch, C., Hommann, K., Rubio, G. M., Sadoff, C., & Travers, L. Water, sanitation and poverty chapter:Poverty reduction strategy papers' source book. Washington, DC:World Bank,2001.
    Brocklesby, M. A., & Hinshelwood, E.. Poverty and the environment:What the poor say:An assessment of poverty-environment linkages in participatory poverty assessments[M]. Swansea, UK:Centre for Development Studies, University of Wales,2001
    Brannlund, R., T. Ghalwash, et al.. Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect:Effects on consumption and emissions[J]. Energy Economics.2007,29(1):1-17.
    Bruyn SM, Opschoor JB. Developments in throughput-income relationship:theoretical and empirical observations[J]. Ecological Economics.1997,20(3):255-268.
    Buys, P., K. Chomitz, et al.. The economics of decentralized poverty-environment programs:An application for Lao PDR[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling.2006,28(7):811-824.
    Carter, M. R. and C. B. Barrett. The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty:An asset-based approach[J]. Journal of Development Studies.2006,42(2):178-199.
    Chichilinsky, G.. North-South trade and the global environment[J]. American Economic Review. 1994,84:851-874.
    Cleaver, K. M., & Schreiber, G. A.. Reversing the spiral:The population, agriculture, and environment nexus insub-Saharan Africa[R]. Washington, DC:World Bank,1994
    Commoner, B. The Closing Circle[M]. Knopf:New York,1971.
    Costanza, R.. Ecological Economics:The Science and Management of Sustainability [M]. Columbia University Press, New York,1991,525 pp.
    Costanza, R., C. Cleveland, and C. Perrings (eds.).1997. The Development of Ecological Economics [M]. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham,777 pp.
    Coxkr. American Geography:Social Science Emergent [J]. Social Science Quarterly.1976, 57:182-207.
    C. S. Holling. Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems [J]. Ecosystems.2001,4:390-405.
    Culas, R. J.. Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve:An institutional perspective[J]. Ecological Economics.2007,61(2-3):429-437.
    Daly H. Steady state economics:second edition with new essays[M]. Washington:Island Pressure,1991.
    Daly, H. E., Farley, J.,. Ecological Economics. Principles and Applications[M]. Island Press, Washington, DC.,2004
    Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Mamingi, N. Pollution and capital market in developing countries[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.2001a,42:310-335.
    Dasgupta, S., Mody, A., Roy, S., Wheeler, D. Environmental regulation and development:a cross-country empirical analysis[J]. Oxford Development Studies.2001b,29 (2):173-187.
    Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., Wheeler, D.. Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives.2002,16 (1):147-168.
    Dasgupta, P., & M'aler, K.-G.. Poverty, institutions and the environment-resource base[R]. World Bank Environment Paper, No.9. Washington, DC:World Bank,1994.
    Dasgupta, P.. An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1993
    Dasgupta, P.. Nutritional status, the capacity for work, and poverty traps[J]. Journal of Econometrics.1997,77:5-37.
    Dasgupta, P.. Population, poverty, and the natural environment', in K.-G. Maler and J.R. Vincent (eds), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Volumel:Environmental Degradation and Institutional Responses, Amsterdam:North Holland,2003, pp.191-247.
    Dercon, S.. Wealth, risk and activity choice:cattle in Western Tanzania[M]. Journal of Development Economics.1998,55(1):1-42.
    Dietz, S. and W. N. Adger. Economic growth, biodiversity loss and conservation effort. Journal of Environmental Management.2001,68(1):23-35.
    Dietz, T. and E. A. Rosa. Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology[J]. Human Ecology Review.1994,1:277-300.
    Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., E. M. Crenshaw, et al.. Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve:A cross-national investigation of intervening mechanisms[J]. Social Science Quarterly. 1994,83(1):226-243.
    Ehrlich, P. R., Holdren, J. P. Closing Circle-Commoner, B. Sci. Public Affairs-Bull. At. Sci. 1972,28 (5):16.
    Ekbom, A., & Boj"o, J. Poverty and environment:Evidence of links and integration in the country assistance strategy process (R). World Bank Africa Region Discussion Paper, No.4. Washington, DC:World Bank,1999
    E.Lambin. Conditions for Sustainability of Human-Environment Systems:Information, Motivation, and Capacity[J].Global Environmental Change.2005,15:177-180.
    Fisher, M. Household welfare and forest dependence in Southern Malawi[J]. Environment and Development Economics.2004,9:135-154.
    Greening, L. A., D. L. Greene, et al. Energy efficiency and consumption-the rebound effect-a survey." Energy Policy.2000,28(6-7):389-401.
    Greening, L. A., D. L. Greene, et al. Energy use, technical efficiency, and the rebound effect:A review of the literature[R]. Washington, DC:US Dept of Energy, Office of Policy Analysis and International Affairs; 1997.
    Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B.. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement [R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3914, NBER,1991, Cambridge MA.
    Guerra, A. I. and F. Sancho. Rethinking economy-wide rebound measures:An unbiased proposal[J]. Energy Policy.2010,38(11):6684-6694.
    Gergel, S. E., E. M. Bennett, et al. A test of the environmental Kuznets curve using long-term watershed inputs[J]. Ecological Applications.2004,14(2):555-570.
    Gurluk, S. Economic growth, industrial pollution and human development in the Mediterranean Region[J]. Ecological Economics.2009,68(8-9):2327-2335.
    Hardin, G. TRAGEDY OF COMMONS[J]. Science.1968,162(3859):1243-1244.
    Hens, H., W. Parijs, et al. Energy consumption for heating and rebound effects[J]. Energy and Buildings.2010,42(1):105-110.
    Herring, H. Energy efficiency-a critical view[J]. Energy.2006,31(1):10-20.
    Herring, H. and R. Roy. Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect[J]. Technovation.2007,27(4):194-203.
    Hertwich, E. G.. Consumption and the rebound effect-An industrial ecology perspective[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology.2005,9(1-2):85-98.
    Hettige, H., Martin, P., Singh, M., Wheeler, D.. The industrial pollution projection system[R]. World Bank Policy Research Department working paper no.1431,1995.
    Hettige, H., Dasgupta, S., Wheeler, D.. What improves environmental compliance? Evidence from Mexican industry[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.2000a,39 (1): 39-66.
    Holden S.T. (1996). Adjustment policies, peasant household resource allocation and deforestation in northern Zambia:an overview and some policy conclusions[R]. In O. Stokke (Ed.), Forum for Development Studies, No.1.1997. Flekkefjord:Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
    Jha, R. and K. V. B. Murthy. An inverse global environmental Kuznets curve[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics.2003,31(2):352-368.
    John, M. P. and R. Chandrasekara. Jevon's Paradox:The Case of India[J]. Disaster Advances 2008,1(2):29-36.
    K.Chaharbaghi, R.Willis. Study and Practice of Sustainable Development[J]. Engineering Management Journal.1999,9(1):41-48.
    Kijima, M., K. Nishide, et al. Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve:A survey[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control.2010,34(7):1187-1201.
    Lambin, E. F. and P. Meyfroidt. Land use transitions:Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change[J]. Land use policy.2010,27(2):108-118.
    Lanoie, P., Laplante, B., Roy, M.. Can capital markets create incentives for pollution control? [J]. Ecological Economics.1998,26 (1):31-41.
    Lotfalipour, M. R, M. A. Falahi, et al. Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuels consumption in Iran[J]. Energy.2010,35(12):5115-5120.
    Madlener, R. and B. Alcott. Energy rebound and economic growth:A review of the main issues and research needs[J]. Energy.2009,34(3):370-376.
    McConnell, K.E.. Income and the demand for environmental quality[J]. Environment and Development Economics.1997,2:383-399.
    Mills, J. H. and T. A. Waite. Economic prosperity, biodiversity conservation, and the environmental Kuznets curve[J]. Ecological Economics.2009,68(7):2087-2095.
    Nancy L. Stokey. Are there limits to growth? [J]. International Economic Review,1998,39(1):1-31.
    Odum, H.T., Odum, E.C..1987. Ecology and Economy;'Emergy' Analysis and Public Policy in Texas:the Office of Natural Resources and Texas Department of Agriculture[R], p 163-171.
    Odum H.T., Environmental Accounting. Emergy and environmental decision making[M]. New York:John Wiley,1996.1-14.
    Odum H.T. Self-organization, transformity, and information[J]. Science.1988,242:1132-1139.
    Panayotou, T.. Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development[R]. ILO, Technology and Employment Programme, Geneva. 1993.
    Pearce, D. W., & Warford, J. J.. World without end-economics, environment and sustainable development[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1993.
    Q.Zhanga, C.Zhub, CL.Liu, et al. Environmental Change and its Impacts on Human Settlement in the Yangtze Delta, P.R.China [J]. Catena.2005,60:267-277.
    Rees WE.. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity. What urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and Urbanization.1992,4(2):121-130.
    Reddy, S. R. C. and S. P. Chakravarty. Forest Dependence and Income Distribution in a Subsistence Economy:Evidence from India[J]. World Development.1999,27(7):1141-1149.
    R.Gimblett, T.Daniel, et al. The Simulation and Visualization of Human- Environment Interactions [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning.2001,54:63-78.
    Rodriguejp. Teaching Transport Geography:American Association of Geographers [J]. Journal Transport Geography.2003,11:73-75.
    Rupasingha, A., S. J. Goetz, et al. The environmental Kuznets curve for US counties:A spatial econometric analysis with extensions[J]. Papers in Regional Science.2004,83(2):407-424.
    Ruzzenenti, F. and R. Basosi. The rebound effect:An evolutionary perspective[J]. Ecological Economics.2008,67(4):526-537.
    Salvati, L. and M. Zitti. Natural resource depletion and the economic performance of local districts:suggestions from a within-country analysis[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology.2008,15(6):518-523.
    Schipper, L. and M. Grubb. On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries[J]. Energy Policy.2000,28(6-7):367-388.
    Schipper, L., Grubb, M.. On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy use in IEA countries[C]. Conference Proceedings, Vol. Ⅰ, Annual International Conference of IAEE, Quebec, Canada,1998, pp.341-350.
    Shafik, N.. Economic development and environmental quality:an econometric analysis[R]. Oxford Economic Papers 46,1994,757-773.
    Skonhoft, A. and H. Solem. Economic growth and land-use changes:the declining amount of wilderness land in Norway[J]. Ecological Economics.2001,37(2):289-301.
    Somanathan, E. Effects of Information on Environmental Quality in Developing Countries[J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.2010,4(2):275-292.
    Sorrell, S.. Jevons' Paradox revisited:The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency[J]. Energy Policy.2009,37(4):1456-1469.
    Sorrell, S. and J. Dimitropoulos. The rebound effect:Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions[J]. Ecological Economics.2008,65(3):636-649.
    Sorrell, S., J. Dimitropoulos, et al. Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect:A review[J]. Energy Policy.2009,37(4):1356-1371.
    Stagl S. Delinking economic growth from environmental degradation? A literature survey on the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis [R]. Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Working Paper No.6,1999.
    Stern, D. I.. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve[J]. World Development.2004, 32(8):1419-1439.
    Sun, J. W. and T. Meristo. Measurement of Dematerialization/Materialization:A Case Analysis of Energy Saving and Decarbonization in OECD Countries,1960-95[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.1999,60(3):275-294.
    Sun, J. W.. Dematerialization and sustainable development[J]. Sustainable Development.2000, 8(3):142-145.
    Sun, J. W.. Energy demand in the fifteen European Union countries by 2010-A forecasting model based on the decomposition approach[J]. Energy.2001,26(6):549-560.
    Torras, M., Boyce, J.K.. Income, inequality, and pollution:a reassessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve[J]. Ecological Economics.1998,25:147-160.
    Turner,K., Perrings.C., Folke,C.. Ecological Economics:paradigm or perspective. In:van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Van der Straaten, Jan (Eds.),Economy and Ecosystem in Change:Analytical and Historical Approaches. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham,1997, pp.25-49.
    Ulgiati S, Odum H T, Bastianoni S. Emergy use, environment loading and sustainability:An Emergy Analysis of Italy [J]. Ecological Modeling,1994,73:215-268.
    Unruh, G.C., Moomaw, W.R., An alternative analysis of apparent EKC-type transitions[J]. Ecological Economics.1998,25:221-229.
    Van den Bergh,C.J.M.J.. Ecological economics:themes, approaches, and differences with environmental economics. Regional Environmental Change.2001,2:13-23.
    Van, P. N. and T. Azomahou. Nonlinearities and heterogeneity in environmental quality:An empirical analysis of deforestation[J]. Journal of Development Economics.2007,84(1):291-309.
    Vukina, T., Beghin, J.C., Solakoglu, E.G. Transition to markets and the environment:effects of the change in the composition of manufacturing output [J]. Environment and Development Economics.1999,4 (4):582-598.
    Waggoner, P. E. and J. H. Ausubel. A framework for sustainability science:A renovated IPAT identity[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002,99(12):7860-7865.
    W.E.Grant, Paul B.Thompson. Integrated Ecological Models:Simulation of Social-cultural Constraints on Ecological Dynamics[J]. Ecological Modelling.1997,100:43-59.
    World Bank (2008b), World Development Indicators[R]. Washington, DC:The World Bank.
    York, R., E. A. Rosa, et al.. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT:analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts[J]. Ecological Economics.2003,46(3):351-365.
    陈国阶.可持续发展的人文机制—人地关系矛盾反思[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2000,(3):7-9.
    陈兴鹏,张子龙,薛冰等.加快少数民族地区经济发展与环境友好型社会建设研究[R].兰州:兰州大学资源环境学院,2006.
    陈禹.复杂适应系统(CAS)理论及其应用—由来、内容与启示[J].系统辩证学学报.2001,9(4):35-39.
    陈治谏,倪华勇等.基于能值分析的四川省生态经济系统可持续性评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2006,15(3):303-309.
    方创琳,鲍超等.水资源约束下西北干旱区城市扩张特征与变动趋势分析.自然资源学报.2004,19(2):248-256.
    方创琳.中国人地关系的新进展与展望[J].地理学报.2004,10(59):21-32.
    樊杰,吕听.简论人地关系地域系统研究的核心领域——土地利用变化[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京).2002,9(4).
    郭熙保,习明明.发展经济学研究的最新进展[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2010,3:1-10.
    葛永林,徐正春.论霍兰的CAS理论—复杂系统研究新视野.系统辩证学学报[J].2002,10(3):65-68.
    古扎拉蒂(美).计量经济学(第4版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
    重新发现地理学委员会.黄润华(译).重新发现地理学—与科学和社会的新关联[M].北京:学苑出版社,2002.
    理查德·皮特.现代地理学思想[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007.
    陆大道.中国人文地理学发展的机遇和任务.[J].地理学报,2003,59:3-7.
    陆大道.中国地理学发展若干值得思考的问题[J].地理学报,2003,58(1):1-8.
    陆大道.关于地理学的“人-地系统”理论研究[J].地理研究,2002,(2):133-145.
    李海涛,廖迎春,严茂超,等.新疆生态经济系统的能值分析及可持续性评估[J].地理学报,2003,58(5):765-772.
    李加林,许继琴,张正龙.基于能值分析的江苏生态经济系统发展态势及持续发展对策[J].经济地理,2003,23(5):615-620.
    刘继生,陈彦光.基于GIS的细胞自动机模型与人地关系的复杂性探讨[J].地理研究.2002,21(2):155-162.
    吕拉昌.人地关系与我国西部民族地区的可持续发展[J].经济地理.1997,3:100-104.
    蓝盛芳,钦佩,陆宏芳.生态经济系统能值分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.
    毛汉英.人地系统与区域可持续发展研究[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社.1995.48-60.
    毛曦.可持续发展理论与历史时期人地关系的研究[J].中国历史地理论丛,2000(2):1-7.
    马颖(2001).”发展经济学60年的演进.”国外社会科学:04.
    Odum H.T(蒋有绪等译).系统生态学[M].科学出版社,1993.8-63.
    潘玉君.地理学基础[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
    乔家君,李小建.村域人地系统状态及其变化的定量研究—以河南省三个不同类型村为例[J].2006,26(2):192-198.
    秦宪文.发展经济学与可持续发展[J].理论学刊.2000,100(6):75-76.
    RJ.约翰斯顿.哲学与人文地理学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.
    隋春花,蓝盛芳.城市生态系统能值分析原理与步骤[J].重庆环境科学,1999,(2):20-22.
    宋长青,冷疏影.当代地理学特征、发展趋势及中国地理学研究进展[J].地球科学进展.2005,20(6):595-600.
    孙才志,王言鑫.辽宁省用水效率动态变化的Malmquist指数分析[J].统计与决策.2008,14:108-110.
    史培军,王静爱,陈婧,叶涛,周洪建.当代地理学之人地相互作用研究的趋向—全球变化人类行为计划(IHDP)第六届开放会议透视[J].地理学报.2006,61(2):115-126.
    宋元梁,肖卫东.中国城镇化发展与农民收入增长关系的动态计量经济分析.数量经济技术经济研究.2005,22(9):30-39.
    吴传钧.人地关系与经济布局[M].北京:学苑出版社.1998.28-33.
    王恩涌等.人文地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
    王惠文,吴载斌,孟洁.偏最小二乘法的线性与非线性方法[M].国防工业出版社,北京:2006,
    王黎明.区域可持续发展-基于人地关系地域系统的视角[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1998.3.
    王磊,宋乃平.宁夏盐池县人地关系的演变及调适对策[J].资源科学.2007,29(6):138-145.
    魏权龄.数据包络分析(DEA)[J].科学通报.2000,45(17):1793-1808.
    魏权龄.数据包络分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
    许世元,王铮等.可持续发展的理论建设问题[J].科学对社会的影响.1995(4):60-63.
    杨德伟,陈治谏,倪华勇,等.基于能值分析的四川省生态经济系统可持续性评估[J].长江流域资源与环境.2006,15(3):303-309.
    约翰·H·霍兰.隐秩序[M].周晓牧,韩晖译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000.序言,31,137,78,60.
    阎小培,林初升,许学强.地理·区域·城市—永无止境的探索[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,1994.
    郑度,陈述彭.地理学研究进展与前沿领域[J].地球科学进展,2001,16(5):599-606.
    赵明华,韩荣青.地理学人地关系与人地系统研究现状评述[J].地域研究与开发.2004,23(5):6-10.
    周民良.贫困、环境与可持续发展[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版).
    詹姆斯.地理学思想史[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982.
    张晓峒.Eviews使用指南与案例[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007.
    张彦虎,靳乐山.西北内陆干旱区环境与贫困关系个案研究[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版).2006,62(1):8-13.
    赵跃龙,刘燕华.中国脆弱生态环境分布及其与贫困的关系[J].人文地理.1996,11(2):1-8.
    张妍,杨志峰.北京城市物质代谢的能值分析与生态效率评估[J],环境科学学报,2007,27(11):1892-1899.
    张子龙,陈兴鹏等.甘肃省经济增长与环境压力关系动态变化的结构分解分析.应用生态学报.2010,21(2):429-433.
    张子龙,陈兴鹏,焦文婷,逯承鹏.庆阳市环境-经济耦合系统动态演变趋势分析:基于能值理论与计量经济分析模型.环境科学学报.2010,30(10):2125-2135.
    张子龙,陈兴鹏,.逯承鹏,郭晓佳.宁夏回族自治区城市化与经济增长和环境压力互动关系的动态计量分析.自然资源学报,2011,26(1):22-33.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700